ML20126A986

Responds to & Ack Receipt of 900605 Telcon Re Proposed Settlement Agreement & Potential Violation of Rights.Complaint of Violation of Rights Per Insp Repts Unsubstantiated

ML20126A986
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	06/14/1990
From:	Wenzinger E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:	AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20126A943	List: A09318, Responds to Allegation RI-90-A-0225 Re Disposition of Ncr 290-063 B13559, Responds to NRC 900606 Request for Investigation of Employee Concerns Re Adequacy of Computer Software Testing Methods at Unit.Revised Quality Software Manual Procedures,Effective Oct 1989,fully Incorporate Applicable Industry Stds IA-91-162, Forwards Details of Allegation RI-90-A-225 for Review & Followup within 30 Days of Ltr Receipt ML20126A940 ML20126A950 ML20126A958 ML20126A970 ML20126A972 ML20126A986 ML20126B001 ML20126B004 ML20126B010 ML20126B016 ML20126B029 ML20126B034 ML20126B047 ML20126B068 ML20126B118 ML20126B123 ML20126B132 ML20126B233 ML20126B240 ML20126B246 ML20126B272 ML20126B278 ML20126B289 ML20126B299 ML20126B304 ML20126B307 ML20126B313 ML20126B324 ML20126B327 ML20126B356 ML20126B361 ML20126B378
References
FOIA-91-162 NUDOCS 9212210327
Download: ML20126A986 (3)

Text

,

\ p* *ec *

g. ,.., UMTED ST ATE $

, j j NUCtEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ,f REQlON I a78 ALLENDALE ROAD

% ' * * * * ,e*

KINO OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 1Ho4 g

$N1iim Docket No. 50-336 Fi1e No. RI-90-0042 AS= W A ~etit InI0Hnation in this record "35 in accordance witp g '

Act e p I l0tu ofInfonnation

- 2 -

Dear This letter is in response to your letter dated October 27,

1989, and in acknowledgement of your telephone conversation with William Raymond, Senior Resident inspector, Millstone Nuclear Power Station, on June 5,1990, in your letter of October 27, 1989, you requested NRC action with respect to a croposed settlement agreement and the potential violation of your rights under 10 CFR 50. We addressed your concerns about the proposed settlement agreement in our letter dated June 14, 1990. Concerning your complaint that your rights were violated under 10 CFR Part 50 and 29 CFR Part 24 based on findings in Inspection Reports 50-336/88-13 and 50-336/89-13, we found your concern un-substantiated. First, in your letter dated October 27, 1989, you did not specify inspection Report 50-336/89-13, but based on our understanding of your concerns we surmised that you were referring to that report vice Inspection Report 50-336/88-13 which you reference later. We reviewed the above stated inspection reports and found no violations of your rights with respect to 10 CFR Part 50 and 29 CFR Part 24. As we stated in our previous correspondence with you in the enclosed letters dated July 12, 1989, and Septerter 26, 1989, ,

we have evtluated your technical allegations as being unsubstar,siated and do '

not intend any further dedicated inspection followup specific to those con-cerns. But, as we stated before, the NRC is continuing to monitor licensee perfornance in the areas of work control and tagouts of plant systems important to nuclear safety through routine resident inspector coverage.

Concerning your telephone conversation with William Raymond on June 5,1990, you expressed the concern that Connecticut Yankee Atomic power Company does not operate their reactor properly; specifically you stated "they don't follow pro-cedures over there." Your concern does not express sufficient detail to war-rant additional NRC followup. If you have specific details of procedural non-compliance we would appreciate your submitting them to this office in writing, in detail, as soon as possible for our consideration.

Thank ycv for your concern.

5 erely,n ,

1 -

ki ward C. Anzin er, C Projects Branch 4 Divisi n of actor hojec 9212210327 920600 PDR- FOIA \/

CUILD91-162 PDR y;

5 w

Enclosures:

1. Copy of July 12,198 lett.er from E.C. Wenzinger to J.

2. Copy of Sep 26, 1989, etter from "

Samuel J. Collins to l A

g me .aoa g

n.cs P M e

--t _ _. ._ __ . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ - _ _ . - . _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . --- _._--_---___--______._ -.__- - - - _ _ _ _ _

I JUN 10 582

' P

( 12.5 Pl. ANT PROCE.DURES s

In accordance with the Appendia A and Appendix B of DPR-65, as well as 10CPR50 Appendix B written procedures are required. To meet these =

requirements, many different levels of procedures and instructions have been estabitsbed. ,

Administrative Control Procedures (ACP) exist,which have established a system for control of the perioreance of all auditable activities conducted at Hillstone Nuclear Power Station. These procedures are issued by-the Station this program.

Superintendent. Administrative Control Procedure 1.01 describes

-Station Procedures are those procedures written on a Unit and Service -

. Group level _ which control the specifies of station operations including maintenance.and modifications, test, inspection, calibration, special processes and plant operating procedures. Station procedures consist of Unit procedures applicable to individual units as well as common site procedures applicable to the-entire station. ACP #QA-3.02 establishes the requirements for controlling the Station Procedures.

( .

t 12.5-1'

-