ML20126B016
Text
,
.. _ ~
~
W ps neo k,
UNITED ST ATEs f
f
,3 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
f-REGION I p'# '
476 ALLENDAtt ACAD IONO OF PMUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 1 Hoe JUN 111990 t
MEMORANDUM FOR:
David C. Williams, inspector General FROM:
Thomas T. Martin, Regional Administrator
SUBJECT:
ALLEGATION REGARDING INTEGRITY On June 5,1990, the senior resident inspector at the Millstone Nuclear Power Station received a phone call, documented in the enclosed record, which sug-gests NRC impropriety. Specifically, it states that "the NRC is covering up
~
crimes by NU" (Northeast Utilities). An allegation panel met on June 6 to review the document and has made a dete ation on t,he required NRC followup.
Based on that review, we will respond t I
~~jin writing on the tech-nical issue and we are referring the alleged impropriety to you.
This memorandum does not request any action, but is forwarded to you for infor-mation and what further action you deem necessary. If you have any questions, please call me or William Kane of my staff.
/
^:
Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator
Enclosure:
As Stated IR!C:tas....,
In 0:CordaRCe w i
~ ' ^ ' * ' ' ' " '..
f0lA fplia,2s S{, ff' "[IInformation N CM 1
I i
j w 9212210344 920608 PDR FOIA QUILD91-162 PDR
-K D APPENDIX 4.0 SAMPLE RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS SITE:
MS Y #3& A/-4_
PANEL ATTENDEES:
ALLEGATION NO,:
96 - A -COV E Chairman -
A/. f4A/4 6dbD (Mtc. Ih3 4 5)
Bra nch Chie f - 6. /A)cA e tng e r' DATE:
a t i Section Chief (AOC)
~T~ $(edlc>s(cy PRIORITY:
High Medium SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: Yes h Unknown Others -
w[
CONCURRENCE TO CLOSE0VT: 00 h SC CONF 10ENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes h
(See Allegation Receipt Report)
IS THEIR A 00L FIN 0!NG:
Yes h
IS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED:
Yes HAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT:
Yes h
HAS LICENSEE RESPONDED TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER:
Yes ACTION:
tt& h NM% 7bCE c4 L,
st. J den. k so.7+,@
UW mM 3) 4)
5)
NOTES:
(
A4-1
l ALLEMTION RECEIPT REPORT Date/ Time Received: Tm 5, sqq o Allegation No.
90 - A -coy z.
llog %
(leave blank)
Name:
Address:\\
Phone:
City / State / Zip:
Confidentiality:
Was it requested?
Yes No X Was it initially granted?
Yes No x Was it finally granted by the allegation panel Yes No A Does a ecnfidentiality agreement need to be sent to alleger?
Ye(
No X Has a confidentiality agreement been signed?
Yes No g Memo documenting why it was granted is attached?
Yes No 4 03, Corp.
Position /
Title:
Facility:
-MS-3-NoJ M W A, Docket No.:
50-42,3 (Allegation Sumary (brief description of concern (s):
D y
Oll M C.Y & A' t L3SAur em.21,,. ?
i v
i Number of Concerns:
b Employee Receiving Allegation:
W. MM OM D (first two initials and last name)
Type of Regulated Activity (a) _X Reactor (d) _ Other: Safeguards (b) _ Yender (e) _
(c) _ Materials (Specify)
Materials License No. (if applicable):
Functional Area (s): _ (a) Operations
~ (b) Construction Z(c) Safeguards
- ((g)) Offsite Health and Safety f Onsite Health and Safety (d) Transportation K(h) Other:
(NRC Region I Fonn 207 Revised 10/89)
Information in this record was deleted in a:cordance with,the Frtpcm of Information Act, exern;tions lf b IL
/
FOI A 4 / ~ ! Q T
/ j'j m;
/
- s W
RECORD OF ALLEGATION FANEL DECISIONS
$1TE:
MW NA Mul--
PANEL ATTENDEES:
ALLEGATION NO.:
9C C0'/ 7-Chairman -
N.O/
OATE: f//6/90 (Mtg.h2345)
Branch Chief -
6.cd n
u
%m v
h Section Chief (AOC) -
i PRIORITY: -
High Medium SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: Yes h Unknown others - D. f4M CONCURRENCE TO CLOSE0VT: 00 @ SC Kb (See Allegation Receipt Report) h k. Mcddy g CONF 10ENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes h
15 THEIR A 00L FINDING:
Yes 15 CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED:
Yes No HAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT:
Yes No HAS LICENSEE RESPONDED TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER: Yes No ACTION:,. -
1)
_j
.e.
2) informatica in this record was deleted
((3 k of Infoden n at or nc 3)
F01A-I ' ' l' A
. c.=... =.
4)
- 5),
NOTES:
l l
t
n l
APPENDIX 3.1 ALLEGATION RECEIPT REPORT S*c',(v) 3/2.3 /9 O Aiiegation No A.2-9o-4 W2_
(leave blank) tt n
Confidentiality:
Yes No d Vas it reauested?
Yes No X Was it initially granted?
Yes No g Was it finally granted by the allegation panel Ooes a confidentiality acreement need to be sent Yes No j to alleger?
Yes No 2 Has a confidentiality agreement been signed?
Yes No y
Memo documenting why i+. was granted is attached?
Alleger's Employer:
k)O NE Position /
Title:
Mo u t-W WY' of
\\
G,3 h f ( o nt ed /
Facility:
M Y
om M:ch Docket No.:
SC
'/2 3
-U3
( Allegation Summary (brief description of concern (s): f M /ws do/ d l-a AlnDbm2 Uf,Ida k (dAu?2/k><$-:
bem, aMe A es lwm h, SmlodIkr hL oibego O Le im(
^
x2
~
D. T.
ff* Lc/ P Employee Receiving Allegation: (first two initials.nd last name) l Safeguards i
Type of Regulated Activity (a) & Reactor (d) _ Other:
(b) _ Ver. dor (e) _
I f
(c) _ Materials (Specify)
Materials License No. (if applicable):
a) Operations e) Emergency Preparedness
_ ((b) Construction__((f) Onsite Health and Safety Functional Area (s):
_ (c) Safeguards
_ (g) Offsite Health and Safety I
__(h) Other: /dat ma
~ (d) Transportation V
~
M{D fnformation in uns record was de!cted (NRC Region I Form 207 Revised 10/89) in mordance with the freedepl of bformation A3.1M!, exerglicas if L '~7 L F01A W /b i 3, j -l Vler
- - -