ML20107F903
Text
- - -.
. - ~ _..
~
~
.k y' g,W ' \\
J461 s 1975 Peter J. Knapp, Chief, Radiation Support Section b i
DISFECTOR's ETALUATION
+
G
- A DIgFECTION BD. 50-219/75-24
)
Inspection of radiation protection activities during operation at j
Oyster Creek en October 30 and 31, and November 5 indicated e number of problems. Nevertheless most of the items inspected were in better than average condittom. h problems were as follows:
l 1.
Method of estimating the rad.*oactive contents of radweste drums.
4 h present method is non-professional and the liem==== should a
determine what errors are involved. I believe that the cdntents it' of drums are being significantly underestimated (based on the limited information available). N licensee will look into this matter. It has been carried as an unresolved item and will be 4
reviewed at a subsequent inspection.
i 2.
Failure to keep doors to high radiation area locked.
l Apparently the control of keys, and instructions to the bearer, i
were in=d*quate to keep these doors locked while an inspection was in progress. N individual involved was a member of the
- g operating crew. This was an item of noncompliance.
i 3.
Retraining records.
i f
Judging by the difficulty I had with arrangement to inspect the i
retraining records, I believe that a retraining problem may exist 1
and we should make a point of inspecting these records on the
)
I next inspection. I ha*9 therefore added it to the outstanding i
l items list.
i 4.
Posting pursuant to 10 CFR 19.11.
j h licensee's referenced material is all available in the Radiation j
Protection Supervisor's office which is not classed as a vital area.
I h posted sign referred to the control room and the shift operating J
foremen's office which are parts of a vital area and are only accessible through locked doors. On this inspection I made it part way - the new sign refers to the Radiation Protection Super-visor's office as maintaining 10 CFR 19 and 10 CFR 20 information.
/
/
D 2.h6n*
O r u n n r. r i
@g 9604230036 960213 PDR FOIA-DEKOK95-258 PDR
1 i ).[x
- .. This should be followed up to get that location referenced for all the posted requirements if that can be achieved. I have therefore 4,.?,;
added it to the outstanding itens list.
5.
Licensee's tagging of eqcipment needing servicing.
The licensee's failure to tag equipment that might otherwise be inadvertently used, and failure to label or markup the covers after finding them inadvertently removed is an indication of a lack of alertness within the operations and maintenance organisations.
I have discussed this with the Project inspector.
r1 E. Pitanlee Reactor Inspector Iddiiu 2
O i
s
i *.
. /
. ',..EMI r0101 #6 j', j g../
,, f (~
oct 74 (REV) ~
l[tfpl ?$ <2 'l l
)
OUTSTAtmT!:0 TTEM T.TST
/
6 cd R P+L 3
Facility /Licensec:
Page #
wk!
,o Yh ccuseNo._h_lk'h
. ;;h Location:
- y..,:
OIL OPE!I!:G CLOSING REFERENCE V U 0 TTEM P/S REFERE';CE 7S~- 2. 'f V
M4A tb./A,w MX d
731 24 I
/cef,4fp,f7 py g 7 v
7T-2-1 V
Radarut nu~t6 Ta4
' 7 5~-2 'f
' %!z Gu TauTu2(w I 75^ s'l LJat (&wuIsMar)
V 75:- 2_'/
P E<&, n &< d 7T-2 1' 5 %-A,S %+
~
724, RfA 16J'ha57
)
7 T-z cf V
rs
(/
O e
\\
.s '
- ~ -
.i
_ =...
e J
- ems, mum
/
e 0
e