ML20107F528

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Inspectors Evaluation Re Insp Rept 50-219/75-08. Revealed Three Significant Items for Which Two Should Be Submitted to Headquarters for Review & Action
ML20107F528
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 04/08/1975
From: Bores R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18039A986 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-95-258 NUDOCS 9604220362
Download: ML20107F528 (6)


Text

_._.

7 s

APH 8 1975 l

J. P. Stohr, Chief. Environmental Protection and Special Programs Section, II I INSPECTOR'S ETALUATION OfSTER CEEEK i

s.

1 INSPECTION REroRT 50-219/75-08

~

This inspection revealed three significant items which are noted below.

j Items 1 and 2 should be submitted to HQ for review and action.

1.

The current envircuumental program is inadequate from many respects, beginning with sampling locations (radiological), sampling tech-niques, and required analyses. The 14ema=== bas no requirements at present with regard to the non-rsdiological aspects.

(Chemical and thermal limits were, however, recently imposed by the EP,A WPDES Discharge Permit.) Note: action was previously requested on the updating of the Environmental Technical Specifications by Track No. AIF14004H2.

2.

With regard to the removal of wood from the discharge canal, as a FES recommended condition for OC's conversion to a Full-Term 9

Operating License, several points should be clarified. Para-graph 7.(b) of the Summary and Conclusions in the FES indicates that the " discharge canal" be cleared of "trashwood, pilings, bulkheads, and other wood that now harbors a resident breeding j

population of marine borers,...."

WA a.

Does this intend that bulkheads be removed only if a j

resident population of marine borers is present? The i

licensee stated that current plans did not call for their removal because, as the licensee contended, bulkheads, if l

backfilled, did not harbor shipworms. He said that the shipworms were only found in wood submerged in water on both sides.

b.

What is intended by the words discharse canalt Clearly the intent must extend at least as far as the marinas that i

were recently purchased by the licensee. But just beyond 4

i these marinas, toward the bay, there are many privately owned slips and boat docks with a lot of exposed wood. Does the FES reca==endation include the removal and replacement I

of all these materials, as well? This should be clarified.

l A

t0 M

/

7s-3 -Q v/ &

g m

Q oc 9604220362 960213 PDR FOIA DEKOK95-258 PDR

~_. _.

d i

4' 3.

The 14-=== 's review of the radiological program is limited to the staff engineer in charge of the proscam. Management does not perform audits of the program at present, nor does it furnish

R any rwiew of the program results. On the other hand, the bio-

~

logical programs, the bank stabilisation and wood removal programs are left almost entirely to the JCPL corporate people (Environ-mental Affairs Department), such that the plant people have little knowledge as to what is going on.

I discussed the review and audit responsibilities with management during the exit inter-view.

4.

In talking with the marina operators, they indicated that they felt the State of New Jersey no longer had much interest in OC.

They said that the state people hadn't collected water-"

samples from Oyster Creek in same time, their water sampler had been inoperable for several months, and their temperature monitoring instrumentation was no longer functioning. I said I would look into this matter.

R. J. Bores Radiation Specialist ces Ed Greenman l

=_

p..OCT74*(REV)

'" ' OUTSTANDING TTEM LIST i

' Facility / Licensee: Od D' ## I Page f 8-v Incation: f5Fkt) _$5,8.5 Ucense No. bfR.~%

OIL OPENING CLOSING F'

f REFERENCE __ V U 0 TTEM P/S REFERENCE M-o.1 vces/p.st O Amines *# sdu whr-S K-02 75-of/D,q e. D Andy,,,,,+ yey w,%.

S l

H R'03 7908/D4,<

0 'fLD 1nonod.s%S..

m S R-0y 7561/pyd 0 % > w. }{.10, % E k. N Cf$

'f I

I.

I

~

R. R-o s 'ir os/pya o noc. An-3 e. <soMht/) S

?*

R-06 is-* T/o vs 0 S* ) s h/Fswhrneed.

S

@A.ad4

,6 S

g R s1 fr-*t/cs o

({

%e/y==hes f t**MS S

g.sg 75-st/p s o

$-09 Pr-et/p s semde c.14J.oa Ly HEs44 3 o

.ef t-lo prvpfp f o Envir.==ed/ 34,we 4ees s

' it-11 7S-or/pg o Nw M. w skt,S F

r l

Q R~l2.

959f/o y O G&s ead)J-hf..

0 6 e K S k ka*//2 S/r g-I) 7S-* f/p10

  • n 5 R-l*/ 75 08lD ll O w,,) ge g d h o c,

$/p

?.

V

)

R-IS 75'6flO 12 O Ee,/.o;hlt2:o to,;e</Shte, S V

)

s

~

O M

e Y*

e

' ' * ~ ^

p. Jette. s w y

- Q

,N *, fu da m-j q lJ

  • ft M

..........,.....u.....;

. j. i (Region 1 Work Fenn) ~.

fl.j 1

    • -(

3 Licensec:, b iL' M / A F/ M d-4 /

Licens'c No.; Df[{ */I

,j (f-f

' C7 Tr.ciitty. t")xA U AI. [

, Docket No'. :.Co.:tt 7

~

I.,

IDR;r1FIED RPT 9 m

o

.e.

e o CL m

(4..

On OTilER REFERENCE s

ITEM R

--w.

3

.Yl j Y Y Wal l1 Y h & s -E L' S$/W7f

  • f Og

'~r ;.

.4 y

/

q s

L,

~.

.,1 l.

{.

/D-t

.J s

j

(

4 l

f l

I i

l l

\\

s S4

,f y item; i;C-Nonco:apliance or noncenformance; UN-nresolved. item; IN-Inquiry itc~

t 11,,8-;cactor'Inr.pection and Enforcement tranch request; 0-Other source requested itc:3.

i j_{.

3,.

6

111SPECTIOU Otfre.TA'iDING ITEMS

.(Region 1 Work forin) j o

i

}J e).l b b'"*/ la'<>._

Licens e No. :

f( d.t ( 0tbil b)<<.d I

g.t Licensec:

i t dai V

4 a)

=

EY 7 ' '7 o

Facility:

8 fij[r t d u c h.

Docket No. :

4

~

(tb d!h 6tkt. *l' htu A ti W a'N CL;51-3DE;iTIFIED RPT i/

o x

~

e.a ITDi R?! =

o m %

D

~

OR OTilER REFERENCE

~

u.u-El Als.).et /7 a..M P

Y. k-LiAh Oc.u4teuil S.<///,u,1U' n9 w-s o

L;uht.5 4 ba}i a

'.I*

t2i M aa.....t....H 7s-ts h

\\\\

y

\\'

4 ll \\ 'o <t.dt ! c$t.1eu f.:Msi) ii hs [L t t' u 1[* *.

?'

s(

h i

$sE$.sb 0 A

/ u ~~uil. si l& I1 ~ $i Yf. ;<C

.1 b k i

'1503 0

X 0 en*l l'.A a $.w, iLWM l' L. I IL l.! *f Il N/.L s-

  • s=**

a y

b J a U e E'.ht. :t G,:tn, ( t L.s. g. ;

.a

~;p

  • ?,,,f (*

\\l x

b. */ IT/Jtsill. n i rktc k N O.

(n.G h.N ik.$i-ba lI'If*I5-0 t

y, t

~ {'t. 8 dM b 60

/

kad.Mb OOWM

'.A ei 70 IL i

0 s

1 dSJw s4 btYb >

[ C0-}f9/'77-lb f

(Iu.h QA) 0 v

/

4/b O A f av:cu.t c1 U

~

h 9 1t 4 f~6-IG

>: 0tt$} W k N h kd. a tY ' ltt 'li<.L v

LLCs ditcl e,,

.a

=

1.,

,~.

s

?

i

.r

~'

4" --g

.et y 1 t en; ':C-:;oncemp) i.ince or nonconformance ; (*:;-L'urer.olved i t,em;.1; - h. ;u; ry. :

v-e(tion and Enforcement Branch request; 0 Other source reque:.. J !; -

,.... eact or Inup/

'g.tJa L 7 6 (4's [f lik *% ket L J

al a

g

(No. /)

711SPECTION Pl.A!!

5 (Region 1 Work Form)

'\\.

Data )$kAC// h, ?b To :

r f/ 9 To lt-P (Senior)

Re : INSPECTION PLAN, [ I 6 TM A 61'/ M h on h4f CN T-h /974 3

i (Facility or License v)

(Dates)

.~

,{"'

The following areas / items are to be examined during the subject inspection:

1.

Outstanding Items: (Reference #s from outstanding items list, or briefly describc)

!IO - :4<1 / 7 8 -1

'/, 7 +/L /,<A-Cs A

/@e 719 'ly r-c 3 '

Mi&n M <r cw v *r u-6 Ps esL17" Yo l'l /7 7 -/ b 40ptr dhGcMis T 4

2 The areas / items checked on the attached enclosure.

3'. Additional areas / items:

h o PI U. E

  1. *) v l1 B hv&w.b.+E lUm..aq l

.N h?D N O ? !3 W &.'A f-W.al%u1lh4hwwla

~

r hW/

~I f _,g, vny

~

1 4.

The following inspectors vill ass'ist:

Jt) spec tor Aren/ Items D.

Y, NO TTA A).

/ L l-b, c,

( c(,

i (Senior)

V' (Pr/U 1

c t.o r) i T,nclosure:

,. Standard Insp. Arcas' 4

e

+v-