ML20107F076
Text
y-;r d,'i
[s
" UNITED ST/.TES fg b
~
.j',
NUCLEAR REGULAiORY COM7.11SSION WASHING ton. D. C. 20555 APR 21 1975
' Docket No.~50-219
.j.
J c%;
g' y Jersey Central Power E Light Company ATTN: Mr.
I.,
R. Finfrock, Jr.
~
Vice President - Generation
-Madison Avenue at Punch Bowl Road Morristown, New Jersey 07960 4
Gentlemen:
On April 15 and April 16, 1975, we discussed via telecon your submittals of March 29, 1975.and April 4, 1975 with representatires of General Public IJtilitics Service Corporation (GPUSC). These submittals present
.; s ki,
/
the results of your reanalysis of ECCS cooling performance.
-4' d-Based.on_our review, we have determined that the above cited subnittals
')
do not-contain sufficierit information to enabic us to conclude that your-j analysis of ECCS cooling performance-is wholly in confornance with the
. requirements of 10 CFR S 50.46(a).
In this regard, we have. identified i
~
additional individual break si:es that should be analy:cd and also additional breat locations that should be studied.
We have: stated that these additional analyses should be performed for both GE and Exxon fuel.
We telecopied a statement of our concern to Mr. N. Trikouros, GPUSC, on April 17, 1975 and also stated our concerns to representatives of GE.
In' order for us to maintain our licensing schedule consistent with your proposed Core Cycle 5 startup date of May 10, 1975, we will need the results of the additional CE analyses cited above by April 28, 1975.
For the same-reason, the results of the additional Exxon analyses, cited above, are needed by April 30, 1975.
Other concerns identified during our review of your ECCS' reanalycis and i
during our review of your Cycle 5 reload submittal (Amendment.'o.
76) have all been discussed via tcJecon with representatives of GPUSC.
Statements of our concerns have also been telecopied to GPUSC.
Our concerns are further documented in the enclosures to our letters of April 2, 1975 and April 21, 1975.
In order to maintain our licensing schedule consistent with your proposed startup ddte of May 10, 1975, we will need responses to our letters of April 2 and April 21, 1975 no later than April 24, 1975.
.If you cannot meet the above review-schedule, it is likely that we will not be aMe to complete our review consistent with your proposed startup-
~
schedule.
r
~
WT80+
pr k
l$~k f
_f
TQ) m l
R R
-1 ir,,./
Q
~
6 4
~ 9604220212 960213 3
I-A v
a.
~~
jf-Mr, I R. Finfr:ck
--2 APR 2 1 '. g75' s
I Please inform us within seven days of the receipt of this letter if you cannot meet this schedule.
Sincerely,
..,,*a.-
y e..,
l E
GeorgeLcTI, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Reactor Licensing cc:
G. F. Trowbridge,_ Esquire Burtis W. Horner, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts, Trowbridge G Madden Stryker, Tams and Dill Barr Building 55 Madison Avenue 910 17th Street, N. N.
Morrist'own, New Jersey
}
'c~'
- Washington, D. C.
2'0006 07960 Jersey Central Power h I.ight Company George F. Kugler, Jr.
ATTN:
Mr. Thomas M. Crimmins, Jr.
Attorney General Safety and Licensing Manager State of New Jersey GPU Service Corporation State llouse* Annex 260 Cherry Hill Road
' Trenton, New Jersey OS625 Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Ocean County Library Anthony Z. Roisman, Esquire 15 Hooper Avenue iF454 Berlin,=Roisman 6 Kessler Toms River, New Jersey 0873 1712 N Street, N. K.
Washington, D. C.
20036
-Paul Rosenberg, Esquire Daniel Rappoport, Esquire 2323 S. Broad Street Honorabic Joseph W. Ferraro, Jr.
Deputy Attorney General State of New Jersey 101 Com.merce Street - Room 208 Newark, New Jersey 07102
. 2 - ~. -
_ _._ ~ _.7.*
Z~ ~l'
- _i t
.-...-- _.I
.