ML20107D608
Text
.. -.
}.
g
.a y,y e
- UNITdD STATES
,)
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,WAStilNGToN D..C. 20055
.DCT. 2.119.75 f
TO: - G$ry Snyder
, Enforcement Coordinator, Region I
SUBJECT:
CHANCE IN ENFORCEMENT SANCTION' LICENSEE: JE2SEY CEITPRiL F0ER /dQ LIGHT COMPldPI The sanction prop (osed by the Region for the subject licensee was
( x) NoticeofViolation) changed from a '< (x ) Civil Penalty 1
to a
<(
) Civil Penalty 4
( ) Order
( ')
Order for the following-reasons:
1.
(' ) The case does not involve an imediate-health, safety, public interest, or comon defense and security consideration.
2.
( ) The case does not meet the folloying criteria for the proposed sanc:-fon:
3.
( ) *fhe case does meet the following criteria for the sanction imposed:
4.
(x )' The case does not have sufficient' action points to support the proposed sanction.
^
5.
( ) The case has sufficient
' action. points to support the sanction selected.
6.
( ) Adequate Regional action (Enforcement conferences, Im ediate Action Letters, etc.) was (was not) initiated to warrant the sanction (taken, proposed).
l 7.
( )
Items of noncompliance were not supported by facts.
1
( x). A 'QA^ breakdown xtss (vas notl)liance appear to.the following 8.
)
established for Most of the iter.c of. noncoup ce procedural an:
.not subatantive in nhture. Fct exsupo, sc: e of.no proce ure-s i
w ere not properly reviewed nr.a apprcyca cut :nera 10 nc innc_ :g;n that the procedures were ceficient or contricatea to an incluent s
with health and safety consideraticns.
Ae tio9%,
u h
At$)).
be.s16 l
-DEKOK95-258 PDR J
o:
4
^
2 f
()
o oct z iM
- 9.. () Other reasons as follows:
y5%) f&2,'
W. P. Ellis, Enforcement Specialist Field Coordination and Enforcement r.
Office of Inspection and Enforcemens cc: DF0 Chief, FS&EB Regional Director
'S e
0 0
l 1
1 3
1 e
4 3
l
\\
f i
O I
e.
e t
- 4 s
=**m,
.i.
...... * +,..
w
-~ ~. j l
,