ML20107B690
Text
-
/
e
-, ~
4 -
. n-s
,)Ci"'.-u@,. W W.,c,
0 g f Q',. >t (
.n_,
o-n O
}
- g; y.p{
'f
,31 <,'
. UNjTED S TATES,,
' ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION '
g
~.,
- g1 87 [
.4 WASHit4GTON. D.C.
20545 Dg
- A FEB 11 M
,,g f1 w
P. A. Morris, Director, Division of Reactor Licensing
/
,f g
JERSEY CENTRAL Poller AND LIGHT COMPANY (0YSTER CREEK)
-7 DOCKET No. 50-219 j
Enclosed for your information la a report of an experimental inspection of the management systems used by the Jersey Central PoNer and Light Company to assure safe operation of the Oyster Creek reactor and to assure. compliance with their operating license.
During this effort, we employed some different techniques which are over and above those which we normally use during our routine inspections.
We plan to experiment further with these techniques and may develop others with a view toward improving our inspection program.
This particular effort, at Oyster Creek, was conducted be-tween October 13 and November 6, 1970, and involved 11 man-days at the site plus 5 man-days at the licensee's management engineering officcs in Farsjppany, New Jersey.
Since this particular inspection was an effort t'o develop new idcas and techniques, the format of the enclosed report in a j
departure frem the one we normally use.
There are many opin-1ons, subjective Judgments, conclusions and related statements
)
in the report,'and the report does not contain the detailed factual information which is usually included to support them.
A similar, second inspection'is now in progress at the Commonuealth Edison Company with respect to the Dresden 2 facility.
A similar report will be prepared in thct case.
You will be provided a copy.
The significant renults of the Oyster Creek inspection are as follows:
1.
The management reorganization, which took effect in April 1970, has resulted in active and knowledgeable participation by management in plant problems, and 2.
Whereas increased management attention was being directed toward improving the safety of operations and the noncdepliance record, additional efforts
~
are needed to stabilize the onsite operating organization and to improve the effectiveness of the reactor safety committees.
.- ~ l e>
=
DEKOK95-258 PDR m
o
% ~~ ~ +. s -~~ w -
- ^ ~
- e ', _J 4.'?
v u
9 fLA) 11 M.
j.
+.
'g" 2P. A.. Morris 2-
]
7 o.
l During future inspections, C.ompliance will, review the corrective measures taken by management with respect to_the. weaknesses or deficiencies identified in the ericlosed report.
+
t,'
0Aw+xbuse-
,, eg.,
t Lawrence D. Low,' Dire 6 tor
-Division of Compliance 9
Enclosure:
- CO Rpt No. 219/70-8 cc w/ enclosure
C. K.-Beck, DR M. M. Mann, DR S. H. Hanauer, DR E. G. Case, DRS (3)
R. S. Boyd, DRL (2)
R.
C. DeYoung, DHL (2)
D. - J. Skovholt, DRL (3)
P. W. Howe, DRL'(2)
A. Giambusso, CO L. Kornblith, Jr., CO
- R. H. Engelken, CO
.#egional Directors, CO REG Files-S e
f i
1
)
\\
- \\
1
'I T-c.
.,.,1
~
,n
+