ML20107B569

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to to Rh Sims Re Insp of Plant Operations Conducted by Cantrell on 721109,10,12,13,17 & 20 & 1207 & 08.Util Will Be Taking Steps to Insure Surveys as May Be Required to Comply w/10CFR20.201(b)
ML20107B569
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/27/1973
From: Ross D
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18039A986 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-95-258 NUDOCS 9604160428
Download: ML20107B569 (2)


Text

Q Jersey Central Powkr & Light Company M ADi$oN AVENUE AT PUNCH SoWL Ro Ao 9 MoRRISToWN, N.J. 07960 e 539 6111 h! arch 27, 4973'

>tr. Janes P. O'Reilly, Director Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region 1 United States Atomic Energy Commission 970 Broad Street Newark, New Jersey 07102

Dear.5!r. O'Reilly:

This letter is in reply to your letter of blarch 6,1973 to

>!r. R. H. Sims regarding the inspection of Oyster Creek operations.

conducted by >1r. Cantrell on. November 9, 10, 12, 13, 17 and 20 and.

on December 7 and 8, 1972.

In connection with item No. 1 of the enclosure.to your letter, we will be taking those steps necessary to insure surveys as mag be required to comply with 10CFR20,201(b) through changes in plant procedures and special instructions to radiation protection Controls will be established during those times when personnel.

surveys indicate the requirements of 10CFR20.105(b) may be violated such as those which could occur during radwaste drum shipments.

These steps should insure full compliance being achieved on this In addition, to prevent a reoccurrence of this type of item.

violation, we intend to investigate the extension of the plant perimeter fencing to a greater distance from the facility than that which presently exists.

In connection with Item No. 2 (a) of the enclosure to your letter, new shielding glass has been purchased and installed on the radwaste drum handling truck. This action brings us into full Further, we intend to conduct an evaluation to deter-compliance.

mine the effectiveness of this glass shield window.

We would expect to have these results availabla for your inspector's review during his next site visit.

With reference to item No. 2 (b) of the enclosure, we are 31, 1973, in receipt of a letter from hir. F. E. Kruesi, dated January requesting certain supplemental information which we intend to supply his office by the end of this week.

9604160428 960213 PDR FatA.

DEKOK95-258 PDR

\\

)fr. J. P. O'Reilly Page 11 March 27, 1973 In response to item So 4 of your attachment, the concentrated waste tank alarm set point has been returned to 95'..

Standing orders, as applicable to the radwaste f acility, will be issued to cover this specific situation and any others that may be necessary. Operating personnel have also been advised of the specific procedures relating to the alarm set point limit for the concentrated waste tank.

Full compilance has been achieved.

Very truly yours, X( ~,:ce U v/',

Mr Donald A. Ross

>!anager, Nuclear Generating Stations pk 1

..