ML20107B305

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept of Insp Performed at Gpusc on 730410 & 11.GPUSC Performed Effective & Well Documented Audits of Fuel Supplier & Major Suppliers.Insp Details Involve Proprietary Data & Being Forwarded as Field Notes.W/O Encl
ML20107B305
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 04/26/1973
From: Reinmuth G
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Robert Carlson
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18039A986 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-95-258 NUDOCS 9604160203
Download: ML20107B305 (2)


Text

_

F UNITED OTATES

' ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION-

' 'I hh '-I WASHINGTON, D.C. 20545 APR 2 6 ~bia R.'T.

Carlson, Chief Reactor Operations Branch, Region-I SPECIAL INSPECTION - JERSEY CENTRAL (0YSTER CREEK) DOCKET No. 50-219 The attached report of the inspectfon performed at the General Public Utility Service Company (GPUSC) on A2ril 10.and 11,192Lis forwarded for issuance'by your office. The inspection, performed by.Mr. Pomeroy and Mr. Potapova, consisted of a review of the results of nudits made by GPUSC of their Oyster Creek reload fuel supplier EXXON Nuclear Co.

(ENC).

During this inspection it was determined that GPUSC, with their consultants, performed effective and well documented audits of the fuel supplier and his major suppliers. A weakness in their documentation of follow-up actions was identified by the licensee and has been corrected.

An outline of the Q/A program for the Oyster Creek reload fuel has been submitted by the applicantl. The submittal also includes a summary of the Q/A activities of GPUSC relative to this fuel. This inspection report references this submittal rather than repeating much of it.

Many of the details of this inspection involve the proprietary data and processes of the fuel manufacturer (ENC), and are therefore transmitted as field notes and not as a part of this report. We therefore, believe that the licensee will find this report acceptable for release to the PDR.

1 Attachment No. 1 to Fac311ty Change Request No. 4, dated

~ January 18, 1973.

4

[

b f

D 9604160203 960213 PDR FOIA DEKOK95-258 PDR

(

APA 16 1373 R. T. Carlson

-2 Although this inspection report does not follow the precise outline suggested in the RO manual, we believe it may.be issued as is, with the addition of the standard cover sheet.

The paragraphs omitted from the standard format are not applicable to this special inspection.

G:. nlk

))f t G. W. Reinmuth, Chief Technical Assistance Branch Directorate of Regulatory Operations

Attachment:

1.

Inspection Report 2.

Field Notes - D. L. Pomeroy 3.

Field Notes - U. Potapovs cc: D. F. Knuth R. H. Engelken, w/o Field Notes J. G. Keppler J. B. Henderson

..