ML20107A292

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-219/73-04.Insp Rept Points Out Two Matters at Oyster Creek
ML20107A292
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/23/1973
From: Cantrell F
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Caphton D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML18039A986 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-95-258 NUDOCS 9604120223
Download: ML20107A292 (1)


See also: IR 05000219/1973004

Text

.

-

_-

.

.

.

e

UNITC3 CTATES

C** l*

oeRECTORATE Ogr agGULATORY OPERATIONS

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

<

RsGeon t

I *

970 SROAD STREET

NEWARK, NEW JERSEY 07102

March 23, 1973

-

,W

.,

!.

D. L. Caphton, Senic'; Reactor Inspector

Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region 1

RO INSPECTION REPORT No. 50-219/73-04

JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY

OYSTER CREEK

This report points out two matters at Oyster Creek that cause me a great deal

-of concern, the first E 'ng the attitude toward procedures.

In my discussions

with the Operations Supervisor, he stated that he would not have shut the

plant down to recover a cold loop, despite the fact that the Operating-

,,

Procedure required shutting the plant down to recover a cold loop. The

' t

,

. reply that the Station Superintendent gave concerning this matter during

our discussion was the proper course of action; however, I am not sure in

my own mind that Jersey would have followed A course of action had they

realized the requirement to shut the plant

Aen this event occurred. I

believe that the -supervision there would ha,

considered the requirement to

shut down as being inserted in the procedure via a temporary procedure change

and as such it could be removed from the procedure in the same manner. The

other matter that causes me a great deal of concern is the matter of what is

recorded in the log books and the fact that this event was not noted in either

a+g

the control room log or the shift foreman's log. The matter of information

^

in these log books has been discussed previously in exit interviews and at

the time the licensee's representative agreed to take action to assure that

more complete information was put in these logs. From my findings, it

. appears that this action has not been effective. This is my basis for re'

questing Jersey Central to address this matter in their reply to our en-

forcement letter. We can not discharge our rest onsibility to the public

when we permit plant records to be only " success records", not true his-

<

tories of plant operation.

.

'

An inspection was not made in the area of corrective actions to violations

identified in the previous inspection; however, this matter was discussed

during the exit interview. From statements made there,it appears the

licensee has corrected the violations that he can correct immediately,

and it appears that other action is underway to reduce the inventory of waste

at the plant and to obtain help in cleaning up the plant. There is no doubt

in my mind that the licensee took our meeting with management seriously.

[kkYf

F. S. Cantrell

Reactor Inspector

,

f

9604120223 960213

PDR

FOIA

DEKOK95-258

PDR