Text

Forwards Description of Changes in Amend 86 to FSAR, Transmitted to NRC Under Separate Cover Ltr
	ML20104A315
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	09/04/1992
From:	William Cahill; TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:	; NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
	TXX-92391, NUDOCS 9209110142
	Download: ML20104A315 (119)
	v • d • e

yg -

v b- i A

m ,

h 1'

_M

-- m Lug # TXX-92391 File # 10010

.-. . Ref.~#10CFR50.34(b)

_ /

TUEi ECTRIC -

1 September 1, 1992 wmiam J. Cahm. Jr. .

omp vkr rmuru -

D - U. S; Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Attn: Document Control Desk 4 Washington, DC. 20555'

..SUBJEC1 : COMANCHE PEAK STEAM P ECTRIC STA110N (CP3ES)

DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 FSAR AMENDMENT 86 OESCRIPTION

' Gentlemen:

Amendment 86.to the~CPSES FSAR, effective August 31, 1992, was transmitted to you underLa separate cover letter TXX-923tD, dated September 4, 1992. The 4 attachment to this-letter provides line-by-line descriptions of the changes in

-Amendment.86.; FSAR pages:which do'not have technical changes but are included in:the. amen 6 ment:(because they are the opposite side of the sheet from'a page that wastchanged, because the change shifted the existing material to another 1

=page or because only~ editorial changes were'made on these pages) are not discussed in the attachment.

TAs?has been the TU Electric practice in past FSAR amendments, all changes

. described in.the ettachment have been evaluated .'or relative significance

-(i.e., the group number 1, 2, 3 or 4 following each change justification as

, discussed-in TV Electric letter TXX-88467 dated June 1, 1988). In addition, ial.1. changes applicable to_CPSES' Unit I have been reviewed under the TU

' Electric 10CFR50;59_ process and?found not to include.any "unreviewed' safety s cquestions."

Amendment 86' includes the following changes previously> transmitted to-the NRC S ;astadvance FSAR submittals or_resulted from NRC Requests for Additional' Informt. tion ~ (RAI):

-1) Revision to the Unit'2-Startup Testing Program, as transmitted in TXX-92146, aated Parch 31, 1992, and as modified by TXX-92318, dated-

Julyi10,11992, in response to_NRC'RAI-dated June 22,.1992.

2) Revisions to FSAR Chapters _4_and 15, as-transmitted in TXX-92397,

,"; dated _ August'19, 1992, in response.to_NRC RAI dated July 20, 1992.

{ ' "

-' -3) Update to GDC 54 applicability as discussed in TXX-92249, dated May 22,fl992,-in response to an oral-NRC RAI.

? 7f- - ,

[ ..

904- 7 P- :05

-92$0044g--- .gf

$ Obd.t..t+ PDR 400 N. Olive Street LB. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201

W%&IC::, pew , 'O % * '

%c2-"

W -

. > p ,p

% , > m^ v-

, . g I, 5

- [Mh w 'r - I r 4

i8 1 e c,,. . ,

(.39 ...

dl-fe ;,$:

pg,q_ , <

. \

- . . . - s-

.y' c Gl"3 1TXX-923911:-

4 'a

- Page 2 of.21 ;

f ' ' , ,L .,

I-

.s I

t

" s

& ^:u =AlsoP as,describ'ed--lin'TXX-92286' dated May 31,:1992, Amendment 86 continued the

$c< '

. process of incorporating into the.FSAR text the responses to NRC questions'

'. icontained in'ESARLvolumes XV,1XVI and: XVII.

s -

fp --

~l-;. ,

Sincerely, i

h. -

- William J. C ill,-Jr.

e. , ,

T _,' ,4, :.-

BSO/bsd.

3V' -3Attschment m ,_

L c . -' Mr. R. D. Martin,l Region IV-

y' J l Resident 1 Inspectors,CPSES_(2) zMrkT?AcBergman,NRRi +

4, Hr? B. E..'Holian,-NRR:(10 copies)

L

.f 4

.f'I t /

Ki s s-.

g , ,

. ,'; .e, T

t. - -

ft: ..

5

,e E, @ +-re .

,. . q u; :s 1:

t3 n

{ s i

y c4 , :;t t t t

[

r k-I('fh/f' -

y;' j i ,

, ::p :

y.; ;

Id a

.I'

,c

.r'3 L 7 k s 4

, .. k?. ..

ppl t

[2-.).y.-

.g.. -1 1 sg.-

f 4;; '[ ,

~

e LAftach2ent to TXX-92391.

Septesber 4, 1992 Page 1 of 117 CPSES FSAR AMENDHENT 86 DETAILED DESCRIPTION FSAR Page

-(M Am_90did) D21Gr_ipllen

-Table 1.6-1 See Sheet No(s):17

Description:

(Update)

Inserts topical report WCAP-8966, " Evaluation of His-positioned ECCS Valves" into the table.

Justification:

This change reflects the update to Section 6.3.3 which references WCAP-8966. See the justification to Page 6.3-3.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-745.1 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-43

Description:

(Revision) ,

Revises description of low power testing for Unit 2 to. '

allow the low power flux distribution to be.done anytime prior to exceeding 30% reactor power.

Justification:

Adds Unit 2 specific information to 1+em 20 that one flux map will be taken prior to exceeding 30% RTP as a fulfillment of RG-1.68, Appendix A, subparagraph 4.e.

Taking the cycle's first flux map near 30% power has become a cummon practice of Westinghouse PWR's during reload testing and is explicitly allowed in ANSI /ANS- ,

19.6.1-1985 (for reloads). It is implicitly allowed in R.G. 1.68, App A, subparagraph 4.e. because many reactor designs are unable to take flux maps at lower power levels. Indeed, at-power maps are historically more repeatable because el higber detector signal strength and the inherently more stable power characteristics with doppler and moderator temperature feedback mechanisms. In the past, larger than expected deviations in "zero power" flux maps from prediction invariably result in the decision to continue power ascension to approximately 30% RTP for another flux map.

The-low power flux map is intended to detect potential errors in:

- Design predictions

- Loading or enrichment of fuel elements

- Manufacture or placement of poison elements

- Positioning or coupling of control rods The standard reload allowance of obtaining this map prior to 30% RTP is acceptat e since multiple quality and procedural controls in fuel manufacture, transport, transfer and loading are in place and have been proven through use.

In addition, verification and video taping of the loaded core is required by procedure. -Any gross, undetected errors should be discovered by rod worth l--

Attach tnt-to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 2 of'117 j i

FSAR Page (Ali Am_qnjad) ReicriDtio0 or boron endpoint measurements during low power ,

physics testing. l Group: 2 l FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.2 l Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No l

1A(B)-43

Description:

(Revision)

Adds description that the 0% power transient testing will not be performed on Unit 2.

Justification:

Adds Unit 2 specific information to Item 20 that no 30% power transient will be performed on Unit 2.

i See Description provided for ,*.0% load swing transient testing on Sheet 23 of Table 14.2-3.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.3 Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-43

Description:

(Clarification)

In response to Item 1 from the NRC RAI concerning the Startup Testing Program Appendix 1A(B) has been clarified to indicate at which power the Automatic Reactor Control System ISU test will be conducted.

(Ref: NRC RAI cated 6/22/92; TXX-92318 dated 7/10/92)

Justification:

RG 1.68, Item 20 Section C.8, Appenidix A (Various) has been clarified to indicate that the Automatic Reactor Control System test "is performed at 50% RTP and intended as a precursor to the first Unit Load Transient test.

I Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622,729 Related SER Section: 14.C; -SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No E

l 1A(B)-43

Description:

(Clarification)

In response to Item 4 from the NRC RAI concerning the Startup Testing program, Appendix 1A(B) has been updated to indicate that an alternate method will be used for ensuring the proper operation of the radiation monitors for Unit 2.

Justification:

Item 21 has been added to Appendix 1A(B) for RG 1.68 l

to indicate the exception to Appendix A, subparagraph 5.z. for ensuring the proper operation of the radiation monitors. In Amendment 81, FSAR sections R423.16.2b, T14.2.2 Sheet 24A and T14.2-3 Sheet 13A were revised to reflect an alternate method for Preop and ISU testing of the Unit 2 Process Effluent Monitoring System.

During the CPSES Unit 1 ISU testing, it was found that

l l

'Attachaont to TXX-92391

September 4, 1992 i Page 3 of 117 FSAR Page (Al A#in_did) D_gigdp_tign the testing of the plant monitors during low power and power ascension testing did not provide any additional data other than that achieved during the Preop testing.

The majority of the systems remain at such low radiation concentrations that the monitors are only responding to background levels. Therefore, for CPSES Unit 2, an alternate method will be used for ensuring the proper operation of the radiation monitors. Each monitor and detector (s) will be calibrated (see FSAR section 11.5.2.11) in lieu of only performing a radiation source check. The expanded Preop testing will be performe1 in lieu of the Process and Effluent Radiation Monitoring System ISU test. The calibration of the process radiation monitors will meet the intent of RG 1.68, Revision 2 Sections 1.k.1, 4.g and 5.z, requirements and will provide a more accurate method for demonstrating the proper operation of the radiation monitors. This update will make Appendix 1A(B) consistent with the previous revised FSAR sections.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622,729 Related SER Section: 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No 1A(B)-70. 71

Description:

(Clarification)

In response to Item 2 from the NRC RAI concerning the Startup Testing Program, Appendix 1A(B) has been updated to-recatorgized the clarifications and exceptions to RG 1.108.

Justification:

Regulatory Position C.2.a.3 has been clarified to state that "During preoperational testing, testing will be conducted at the full-load-carrying capability for an interval of not less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , of which 22 hours2.546296e-4 days 0.00611 hours 3.637566e-5 weeks 8.371e-6 months will be at the continuous rating capability of the diesel-generator and.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months at a load equivalent to the two hour rating of the diesel generator.

Regulatory Position C.2.a.5 has been clarified to state that during preoperational testing the proper operation for the design-accident-loading sequence to design-load requirements will be demonstrated.

Regulatory Position C.2.a.9 has been clarified to state that the number of-valid tests with no failure for each emergency diesel generators will be from " consecutive" tests.

Regulatory Position C.2.d has been clarified to correct t':e typographical error from "10" to "100" for the

! number of valid tests, j Group: 4 l FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622,729 Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No

1 Attachmont to TXX-92391 Septembor 4, 1992 Page 4 of-117 1

FSAR Page (M Amtmig_d) lbltscriDtion 1A(N)-53

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a reference to Section 5.3.2.1, in Section 1A(N),

Discussion of Regula,ory Guide 1.99.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The information contained in the response to 0121.3 is contained in both Section IA(N) and 5.3.2.1. This change merely cross-references FSAR Section 5.3.2.1 to Section IA(N) Discussion of Reg. Guide 1.99.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-304.1 Related SER Section: 5.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.5-8

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Add new description to 3.5.1 describing why the valve stem cannot be ejected from 0212.088.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-054.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.5-13

Description:

(0&R Incorporatiun)

Add new paragraph to 3.5.1.2.3 and incorporate the information from the response to 0212.87.

Justification:

This is.an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-053.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.5-13

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds new FSAR Section 3.5.1.2.5 titled " Secondary Missiles" and inserts the text of the response to Q&R 212.10.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the update FSAR is prepared.

Group: '4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-370.2 Related SER Section: 3.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 1'

l l

Attachment to TXX-92391 Septeober 4, 1992 Page 5 of 117 FSAR Page (n gagndgd) Description 3.5 26

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a reference to a new FSAR paragraph 3.8.4.1.7 for additional information concerning the properties of the concrete and typical reinforcement details as it per-tains to Section 3.5.3.1.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to rer' the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAL ('J S AR ) is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-332.2 Related SER Section: 3.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-54

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.6-100 through 3.68-103 in Section 3.6B.2.5.2.

Justification:

The FSAR currently does not contain the Unit 2 Pipe Break Location and Restraint location Figures which need to be added. This change adds the referenced figures to the FSAR.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.1 Related SER Section: 3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No

.s 3.6B 55

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.6B-104 through 3.68-107 and 3.6B-119 through 3.6B-122 in FSAR Section _

3.6B.2.5.2.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.68-54.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.2 Related SER Section: 3.6B SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-58

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.6B-108 through 3.68-111 in FSAR Section 3.6B.2.5.2.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.6B-54.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.3 Related SER Section: 3.68 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-59

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference t3 new FSAR Figures 3.6B 112 through 3.6B-118 in F3AR Section 3.68.2.5.2.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.68-54.

. Attachment to TXX-92391 Septenbor 4, 1992 Page 6 of 117 FSAR Page (A1 Amandad) D#Jiti.pl.AD i

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.4 Related SER Section: 3.6B SER/SSEP Impact: No 3.6B-62

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.6B 124 through 3.6B-130 in FSAR Section 3.6B.2.5.2.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page J.6B-54.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.5 Related SER Section: 3.6B SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-63

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to isolating check valves 2AF-093, 2AF-101, 2AF-083 and 2AF-075 in FSAR Section 3.6B.2.5.2 Subsection 3.D.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.6B-54. These Unit 2 valves are discussed in the Auxiliary feedwater System Environmmental Analysis in Section 3.6B.2.5.2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.6 Related SER Section: 3.6B SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B-67

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.6B .36 through 3.6B-144 in FSAR Section 3.6B.2.5.2.

. Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.60-54.

Group: 3 FSAR Changa Request Number: 92-722.7 Related SER Section: 3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.68-70

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.6B-183 through 3.6B-206 in FSAR Section 3.6B.2.5.2.

l Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.68-54.

Group: 3

! FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.8 Related SER Section: 3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 1

1 l.

Attachnent to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 7-of 117 FSAR Page (n Aman _dgd) Description

-3.6B-72

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.68-172 and 3.6B-173 i' FSAR Section 3.6B.2.5.2.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.68-54.

Group: 3- ,

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.9 !

Related SER Section: 3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.6B 74

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a reference to new FSAR Figures 3.6B-147 through 3.68-169 in FSAR Section 3.68.2.5.2.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.6B-54.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-722.10 Related SER Section: 3.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 3.6B-1 See Sheet No(s):01 through 55

Description:

(Addition)

Add Unit 2 high energy lines, add descriptions to the the table, make editorial-and typographical corrections to the table. correct and clarify the " Notes" at the end of the table. Remove moderate energy lines in the table.-

Justification:

The addition of the Unit 2 high energy lines is to reflect the as-designed components. The descriptions were added to the lines-identified in the table without descriptions to aid in iaentifying the high energy line

. The edittorial and typographical corrections have been added to make the table correct. The notes were revised to-remove redundant notes and to make the notes clear.

Moderate energy lines were removed from the table since this table identifies high energy lines.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: SA-92-617 Related SSER Section: SSER23 3.6

l. SER/SSER Impact: No l

Figure 3.6B-100 , 206

Description:

(Revision) r Inserts new Unit 2 figures. F3.6B-100 thru F3.6B-206 except for figures F3.6B-124 -131. -145, -146, 170 l -171, -174, -186. -187, -190 & 191 which are j intentionally unused. These figures provide the Unit 2 l pipe break locations.

Justification:

Refer to the justification for Page 3.68-54.

! Group: 3 l

~, ,, . . . . - - .-

Attachmont to T1X-92391 September 4. 1992 i Page 8 of 117 i

FSAR Page

.(At Aman _dgd) DescrIDtiqn FSAR Change Request Nueber: 92-722.12 Related SER Section: 3.C SER/SSER Impact: N-3.78

Description:

(0&R Incorporatien)

Insert the information contained in the response to Q&R 130.13 into FSAR Section 3.7B.3.12.3 Justificatien:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-337.2 Related 3ER Section: 3.7 SER/SSER Impact: No J

3.8-71

Description:

_ (Revision)

Revises discussion in Section 3.8.1.7.1 to reflect the new predicted displacement values that 3re used to validate the Unit 2 Structural Integrity Test (SIT) results.

Justification:

The displacement values given in Figure 3.8-19 for Unit 1 are being revised and will be updated in a later FSAR amendment. These values will be identical to the Unit 2 values given in Figure 3.8-19a.

hhe original dispiacement values used for the Unit 1 SIT were obtained from a calculation which was subsequently voided during the design validation program for Unit 1. New values were calculated to establish predicted displacements for Unit 1.

, A discussion addresting Unit I will be included in the later amendment. The same new values used for Unit 1 are also used for Unit 2 (Figure 3.0 19a). These new Unit 2 values are in all cases smaller (more restrictive) than the original Unit I values.

The new displacement values are to be used as acceptance criteria for the displacements measured during the-Unit 2-Structural Acceptance Test.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-0676.1 Related SER Section: 3.8.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l_ 3.8-72

Description:

(Revision)

The discussion of Freoperational Containment test has l been updated to indicate that Unit 2 will only perform L a Peak pressure test. The reduced pressure test will l not be performed for Unit 2 because it is not required by Appendix J.

Justification:

Attachment to TXX-92391 S2ptember 4, 1992

.Page 9 of 117 FSAR Page (31 amendsd)- Description 10CFR 50 Appendix J Section Ill. A 4.a allows a Type A Containment Integrated Lakage Rate Test (ILRT) to be performed at a reduced pressure Pt not less than 0.50 Pa, if a correlation between the reduced pressure ILRT test and the Peak Pressure ILRT can be made to ensure that the total containment leakage volume will not exceed the value assumed in the-Safety Analyses at the peak accident pressure. -This reduced pressure test is initially performed during preoperational Startup tests in order to apply this correlation for future periodic ILRTs. Using the Unit 1 Containment reduced pressure test results, a correlation could not be made.

The proposed revision to Appendix J does not allow reduced pressure tests to be used for periodic ILRT because it has not been demonstrated that one can extrapolate a leakage rate from a reduced pressure test to a leakage rate under full presssure. Conducting this additional reduced pressure test on Unit 2 will add an approximated 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months of critical path time to the Startup schedule without any-expected benefit.

During the conduct of this test, all other construction activities in the Containment and with the systems associated with ILRT (i.e. Reactor Coolant, Safety Systems, CVCS system etc.) will cei e. This time is very valuable just prior to fuel load and low power testing. Also. TU Electric has a commitment to ANI to not do reduced pressure tests. Also, see description provided for page 6.2-142.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-733 Related SER Section: 6.2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No

.3.8-113

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Inserts the information contained in the response to 0&R 130.4 into the FSAR text _as paragraph 3.6.4.1.7.

Justification:

This is an editorial change the ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR (USAR) is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-332.3 Related SER Section: 3.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 3.8-19

Description:

(Addition)

Revises the title block of Figure 3.8-19 to indicate that the containment structural integrity test predicted values are for Unit 1.

Justification:

See justificaton for LDCR-SA-92-0676.1 (page 3.8-71)

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-0676.2

Attachnent to TXX-92391 S:pte bor 4, 1992 Page 10 of 117 FSAR.Page (11 AAgnded) Description Related SER Section: 3.8.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 3.8-19a

Description:

(Addition)

Adds Figure 3.8-19a to reflect the predicted displacement values for the containment structural integrity test for Unit 2.

Justification:

See justificaton for LDCR-SA-92-0676.1 (page 3.8-71)

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 0676.3 Related SER Section: 3.8.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 3.8-22 See Sheet No(s):1

Description:

(Addition)

This figure is updated to clarify that it is for Unit 1 only-and to be consistent with the details provided for Unit 2 on sheet 2.

Justification:

This updated figure provides the specific details for the Unit 1 airlock only.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 3.8-22. See Sheet No(s):2

Description:

(Addition)

Adds sheet 2 to show the Unit 2 mechanical & electrical penetrations for the personnel airlock.

Justification:

This new-sheet provides the specific details for the Unit 2 airlock.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 3.8-23

Description:

(Addition)

The figure is updated to include the Containment. isola-tion valve numbers.

Justification:

This detail is required for this figure and should not have-been removed in amendment 83 during the figure clean-up.

Group: 3 FSAR. Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3

'SER/SSER Impacti No

Atthchment to TXX 92391 September 4 -1992 Page 11 of 117-FSAR Page

( n s tadtd)- Rescription 3.11N-2

Description:

(Editorial)

Adds reference 3, Supplement I to WCAP-8587 into the FSAR text.

Justification:

This change provides additional reference to document l accepted by CPSES and NRC. l Group: 4 i FSAR Change Request Number: 92-81.2 ;

Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11 l SER/SSER Impact: No i 3.11N-3

Description:

(Editorial)

Adds reference 3 . Supplement I to WCAP-8587 into the FSAR text.

Justification:

This change provides additional reference to document accepted by CPSES and NRC.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number:-92-78.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No 3;11B-1

Description:

(Editorial)

Relocates information from 0&R 040.042 response to the FSAR text.

Justification:

0&R response is revised to reference the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-154.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No 3.118-9

Description:

(Editorial)

Adds equipment qualification information on class 1E splices, cable connectors, termination cabinets and-terminal blocks inside the containment into the-FSAR text.

Justification:

This-information is relocated from the 0&R 032.6 response to the FSAR text.

-Group: 4

~

FSAR Change. Request Number: 92-81.3 Related SSER Section: SSER2P 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No APP 3A-2 4

Description:

(Revision)

Changes the fourth paragraph of Apoendix 3A. 2.4 to describe the CPSES maintenance and surveillance program and list provisions for preventing or detecting age-related degradation in safety grade equipment.

Justification:

The revised paragraph clarifies the maintenance and

Attachsent to TXX 92391- l September 4, 1992 i Page 12 of.117_

FSAR Page (11 Amended) Description surveillance program in place and is consistent with SSER-6 and design requirements which contain provisions for preventing or detecting age-related degradation in safety-grade equipment. Commitment to the provisions are addressed by existing maintenance, surveillance, inspection and testing programs.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-644 Related SER Section: 3.11: SSER6 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No 4.2-21

Description:

(Correction)

Correct description of Moderator Temperature Coefficient.

Justification:

l Cycle specific safety analyses for CPSES Units 1 and 2 can allow a positive moderator temperature coefficient below 100% power consistent with Technical Speciffcat-ion Section 3.1.1.3 . Further this change clarifies the use of burnable absorbers and describes their effect on the MTC.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-710 SER/SSER Impact: Nc 4.2-22

Description:

(Update)

Designate Silver-Indium-Cadmium Control Rods as the Primary Design to be Consistent with other Sections of the FSAR Justification:

Other sections of the FSAR indicate that the-control rods for both Units I and 2 will be Ag-In-Cd instead of hafnium. In addition, the NRC approved the use of Ag-In-Cd control rods for both units in SSER 23.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-757.01 Related SSER Section: SSER23 4.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 4.3-70 _74

Description:

(Clarification)

Add a Refe-ence Which was Inadvertently Omitted in FSAR Amendment 84 Justification:

L Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-757.02 SER/SSER Impact: No 4.3-70. 74

Description:

(Addition)

Addition of NRC Safety Evaluation Report to Reference List for FSAR Chapter 4

Justification

! FSAR amendment 84 incorporated a description of Opti-l

~l Attach 2ent to.TXX-92391 September 4,-1992 Page 13 of 117 FSAR Page j (31 amendgd) Op.scriDtioB j i

mized Fuel Assemblies for Unit 2. The N'.C Safety Eval-uation Report was discussed in the text, but was inad-vertently not included in the reference list.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-156.99 SER/SSER Impact: No 4.4-66

Description:

(Correction)

Revise method of recording data from the Loose Parts Honitor for Unit 2.

Justification:

Unit 2 data is recorded on a system hard disk instead on tepe. The Unit 2 data can be downloaded to a floppy disk or can be printed in hard copy.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-681 L SER/SSER Impact: No 5.1-9

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0032.038 and adds the information and reference to the question in the FSAR text.

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-99.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 5.2-20

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocate and insert the information contained in the response to Q&R 123.9 in FSAR Section 5.2.3.3.1.

I Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-328.2 Related SER Section: 5.2' SER/SSER Impact: No 5.4-14

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Revises Section 5,4.1.5.3 to reference the new FSAR Tables 5.4-19 and 5.4-19A.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-326.3 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

,Attachmont to-TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 14 of 117-FSAR Page (Al Auf!Ldtd) EMGdP1 lod

~ Table 5.4-19

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Creates new FSAR Table 5.4-19 by relocating the information contained in O&R 123.7 Table 123.7 1.

Justification:

This is-an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-326.4 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 5.4-19A

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Creates new FSAR Table 5.4-19A by relocating the information contained in O&R 123.7 Table 123.7-2.

Justification:

JThis is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-326.4 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 5.4 6

Description:

(Revision)

Shows the installation of tubing on the discharge of various vent valves to minimize the potential for radiation contamination.

Justification:

This change adds 1/2 inch stainless steel tubing to existing valves that are utilized to vent various systems (e.g., RHR, CT, CVCS A SI). The v:lves were previously vented to the atmosphere and whenever they are opened to confirm flor, there is tygon tubing connected to the valve (s) routed to a local radioactive drain. This operation requires direct contact with radioactive fluids and-a high probability of unnecessa-ry contamination. By installing the permanent tubing, the operator will only have to open the valve (s) and confirm flow into 4,he floor drain. This modification will minimize the potential for operator contamination.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-698 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER-Impact: No 6.2 68

Description:

(0&R Incorporation; Inserts the text of the response to Q&R 022.16 into FSAR Section 6.2.2.2.1. item 7.

uustification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the FSAR is updated.

l Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-71.1 l

' Attachment to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 LPage 15 of 117 FSAR Page (A1 Amtndad) DescriptLqD Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-77

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Inserts the information contained ia the response to 0&R 022.11 into FSAR Section 6.2.2.3.4.

Justification:

This is an editorial change the ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the update FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-47.2 Related SER Section: 6,2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-81

Description:

(Clarification)

Adds references which show the instrumentation provided for indicating the Containment sump level for clarity, Justification:

This indication of Cortainment sump level is provided by wide range Level Trasmitter, LT-4779 and LT 4781, as shown in FSAR Figures 6.2.2-1 Sht 2 and 7.1-3 Sht 3 and Table 032.110-1 Sht 3. This clarification will avoid any confusion for the narrow range level transmitters provided for leakage detection as shown in FSAR Figure 9.3-5 and discussed in FSAR Section 5.2.5. This clari-fication is consistent with SSER'23 section 7.5.2 page 7-7.

Group:'4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-654 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-81

Description:

(Correction)

The description and the reference to the instrumenta-tion provided for the CSS parameters has been corrected to be consistent with FSAR section 7.5. Table 7.5-7 and Table 032.110-1 Sht 3, 7 and 11.

l. Justification:

FSAR Section 7.5 was previously tittled " Safety Related Display Instrumentation." Also, Table 7.5-1 previously-listed the Control Room indicators and/or recorders available to the operators due to Condition II, III. or IV event. This Table indicated that the purpose for monitoring Containment Spray pump pressure and flow was for essential accident functiens. FSAR section 7.5 has been updated to the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.97. The revised section does not list the pump l

pressure to be a parameter to be monitored and has-

, therefore been remu>ed. Also, the description of the l' Containment parameter for measuring' level has been corrected by substituting the word " water" for " sump" to be consistent. This revision is consistent with SSER 23 section 7.5.2.

Attachsent to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page-16 of 117 FSAR Page -

(a1 amended) Description Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 654 )

SER/SSER-Impact: Yes ;

SER.section 7.5.1 page 7-24 is not consistent with this ;j correction, j 6.2 83

Description:

(Correction)

The sentence has been revised to clarify which sections of the FSAR describe the Containment leakage test pro-gram and the RCS leak dete: tion systems.

Justification:

This clarification is consistent with the referenced FSAR sections.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-84

Description:

(Clarification)

A sentence has been added to cross reference the FSAR-section which describes accident monitoring instrumen-tation for detecting leakage outside Containment.

Justification:

This clarification will reference the applicable FSAR section which describes the leak detection system out-side Containment.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-84

Description:

(Clarification)

A paragraph has been added to cross-reference the FSAR section which describes post-accident leakage detection capabilv=outside contairment.

Justificatica:

This clarification is consistent with the information to be provided for SRP 6.2.4 (II.6.q).

Group: 4

-FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-86 .

Description:

(Ciarification)

A cross-reference has been added io indicate that FSAR section 7.5 describes the accident monitoring instru-mentation provided for RCS leak detection.

Justification:

This clarification is consistent with the information to be provided for SRP 6.2.4 (II.6.q).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211

. . ~_

l Attadhaent to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 ;

Page 17-of-117 !

, FSAR Page i (Al amended) Description l Related SER Saction: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

'6.2 91. 92

Description:

(Revision)

Inserts the following discussion in Section 6.2.4/10:

" Power to the hydraulic pump for tnete ... valves is tripped by a "SI" signal to ensure that no failure in the non-class 1E control circuits or a spurious signal can cause the valves to open coincident with a LOCA".

Justification:

Review of BTP ICSB-18 compliance for valves identified the need to document the acceptability of non-environ-mentally or seismically qualified power to the person-nel airlock. Train A to 1EB1-2 shows the trip on SI signal (see Figure 8.3-8. Sh. 1). This iarifies the safety significance of this trip with respect to 10CFR 50.49 and BTP ICSB-18.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Rcquest Number: 92 746 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-91,

Description:

(Revision)

Item 10 is updated to describe the Unit 2 Personnel Airlock equalization valves design.

Justification:

This new description provides details not previously discussed for the airlock.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 -

SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2 92, 93

Description:

(Revision)

Item 11 ie updated to describe the Unit 7. Personnel Airlock n/draulic system valves design.

Justification:

This new description provides details not previously ,

discussed for the airlock.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-99

Description:

(Clarification)

A sentence has been added to indicate the provisions for post accident leak detection.

Justification:

This sentence indicates the systems provided for cot.tpliance with GDC-54.

Group: 4 l FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211

Altachmont to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 18 of 117 FSAR Page (11 amended) Description Related SER Section: 6.2,'3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-102. 103

Description:

(Addition)

Adds exception 4 to describe the test direction justification for the Unit 2 manual spring closed equalization valves.

Justification:

TNis description indicates that the orientation of the equalization valves will results in increased seating force applied under DBA pressure loads.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-139

Description:

(Revision)

The discussion of Preoperational Containment test has been updated to indicate that Unit 2 will only perform a Peak pressure test. The reduced pressure test will not be performed for Unit 2 because it is not required by Appendix J.

Justification:

See discussion provided for Section 3.8.1.7.2 on page 3.8 72.

Group: 3 FS AR Change Request Number: 92-733 Related SER Section: 6.2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.2-144

Description:

(Clarification)

A clarification is made to indicate that Unit 1 Personnel airlock hydraulic system is not required to perform additional testing.

Justification:

Unit 2 Personnel airlock is required to perform Type C testing as described in Section 6.2.6 and Table 6.2.4-2 item 133 based on the modifications made.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Correction)

Corrects the total number of spray nozzles for Unit 2 from 764 to 754 to be consistent with Table 6.5-5 and Figure-6.2.2-1. sheet 1.

Justification:

The overall reduction of 10 spray nozzles will not impact the Containment Spray System coverage. The results of a walkdown indicated tisat a number of spray

n 1 l !

Attachrent to TXX-92391

.Stptonbor 4. 1992 ;

Page 19 of 117 !

1 i

FSAR Page

( Al Amfdidad)- QAltLIAt19!1 nozzles had varying degrees of blockage; therefore, six (6) spray nozzles on Train A-and four-(4) spray nozzles on Train B have been removed and capped. The associ -

ated stress analysis has been qualified for spray nozzles which are heavier and longer than a stub with a threaded cap: therefore, this change will yield con-servative stress analysis results.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-712 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Correction)

Corrects the total number of spray nozzles for Unit 2 to be consistent with FSAR Section 6.5.2.2.3 and Table 6.5-5.

Justification:

The overall reduction of 10 spray nozzles will not impact the Containment Spra/ System coverage. Refer to the justification for Table 6.2.2-1 for additional information.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-712 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2 1 See Sheet No(s):1 and 2

Description:

(Revision)

L Shows the installation of tubing on the discharge of various vent valves to minimize the potential for radiation contamination, Justification:

This change adds 1/2 inch stainless steel tubing to

-existing valves that are utilized to vent various systems (e.g., RHR, CT, CVCS & SI), See justification provided for Figure 5.4-6, E Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-698 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.2-1 See Sheet No(s):2

Description:

(Addition)-

Revise figure to reflect plant design modification that installed sample sinks and associated flush and drain lines, r Justification:

Plant enhancement to improve the ability to provide adequate sampling and minimize the potential for spills and contamination due to sampling.

L Groep: 3 L

i Attachment to TXX-92391 j Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 20 of 117 FSAR Page

-(3d amended) Epscription FSAR Change Request Number: 91-131.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6,2,4-1 See Sheet No(s):12

Description:

(Clarification)

Items 130, 131 and 131a are clarified to indicate that they are for Unit 1 only, Justification:

The Unit 2 design is indicated in items 133, 134 and 134a.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-1 See Sheet No(s):12

Description:

(Revision)

Adds the Unit 2 personnel airlock mechanical penetrations (item #133, 134 and 134a).

Justification:

Updates the Table to reflect the Unit 2 mechanical penetrations associated with the personnel airlock.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

~ Table 6.2,4-2 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost *

' isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 _~

dimensions. Also, the Unit I designator is removed for the valves in items Sa, Sb, 9a and 9b.

Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor _are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

L -Group: 3

-FSAR Change Request _ Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 l SER/SSER Impact: No l

l Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost L isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. Also, the unit 1 designator is remoyed for l the valves in items 13a, 13b, 18a and 18b.

l Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment : solation System. The removal of the valve designa tor is consistent with Note 6 of this Table.

l

'Attachmsnt to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 21 of 117 I

FSAR Page

.(A1 ARtadtd) Rejtr. int 193 Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):03

Description:

(Update)

The -column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation volve is updated to include the Unit 2 dirensions. Also, the Unit I designator is removed for the valves in items 20,20a,20b,20c,20d: 22,22a,22b,22c, 22d: 24a,24b,24c 24d: 26,and 26a.

Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):04

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. Also, the Unit I designator is removed for the valves in items 26b,26c,26d: 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36 Justification:

This updata incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Shtet No(s):05

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. Also, the Unit I designator is removed for the valves in items 41,41a: 42, 43, 44, 45, 46 and 47.

Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-merit Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 f FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 l- Related SER Section: 6.2.3 L SER/SSER Impact: No l

1 Attachment to TXX-92391 l Septembor 4, 1992- 'l Page 22 of 117

..FSAR Page-(M ARtDdid) Etiff.iDL19.0 Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):06

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 ,

dimensions. Also, the Unit I designator is removed for the valves in items 48, 49, 50, 51, 52,52a; 53, 54, 55 and 56.

Justification:

This update incor porates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SEP Sec' 6.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact-Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):07

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost

. isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. Also, the Unit I designator is removed for the valves in items 60a, 61a, 62 and 67. Unit 2 valve numbers have been added for items 61a, and 71.

Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Icolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Rcquest Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):08

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost l isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. The Unit'l designator is removed for valves i in items 74a,77a,78a,80a,81.83. The location-of HV-4166 l

l has been changed and item 83a updated for U2 valve No.

Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 FSAR Change _ Request Number: 92-718

! Related SER-Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach: nt to TXX-92391

+

Septenbor 4, 1992 Page 23 of 117 FSAR Page

(.aj ngnded) Descripilpa Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):09

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions.

Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):10

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. The Unit 1 designator is removed for valves in items 104, 105, 113 and item 114a has been updated to include the Unit 2 valve number.

Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contcin-ment Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):11

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. The Unit 1 designator is removed for valves in items 116.117.118,119,120.124.125.126 and item 120a, 121a, have been updated to include the U2 valves Justification:

This update it.corporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System. The changes in the valve designa tor are consistent with Note 6 on this table.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):12

Description:

(Update)

The column indicating the length of pipe to outermost isolation valve is updated to include the Unit 2 dimensions. Itemt 125, 126, 127 and 128 have been updated to include the bonnet overpressure relief valve installed for 8811A&B, HV-4782 and HV-4783.

AttachCent to TXX-92391 Septeober 4.-1992 Page 24 of 117

-FSAR Page

-(AE'ARCDdfd)l DAlcrIDtIoD Justification:

This update incorporates the Unit 2 design for Contain-ment Isolation System. Pressure relief valves and lines have been added to relieve pressure buildup in the bonnet chamber of gate valves which are potentially affected by pressure locking based on information provided by INP0 SER8-88. This change is scheduled to be implemented fo Unit 1.

Group: 3-FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-2 See Sheet No(s):12

Description:

(Correction)

Corrects item 132 by removing the Unit I designator.

Justification:

The valve :, umbers for the emergency airlock are the same for both units and therefore note 6 applies.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2,4-2 See Sheet No(s):12, 13

Description:

(Revision)

Adds the Unit 2 personnel airlock Containment isolation valves. (item #133, 134 and 134a).

Justification:

, Updates the Table to reflect the Unit 2 mechanical penetrations associated with the personnel airlock.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request dumber: 91-039 Related SER Section 6.2.3

'SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-3 See Sheet No(s):17

Description:

(Update)

Items 125,126,127 and 128 have been updated to include the bonnet overpressure relief valve installed for 8811A&B, HV-4782 and HV-4783.

Justification:

This change is consistent with the changes on Table 5.2.4-2 sheet 11 and 12.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-718 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: o

Attachnant to TXX 92391 Septcsber:4.'1992 Page 25 of 117 FSAR Page ,

(Al-Amendsd) DescrIDtion Table 6.2.4-? See Sheet No(s):18

Description:

(Revision)

Adds the Unit 2 personnel airlock mechanical penetra-trations (item #133,-134 and 134a).

Justification:

Updates the Table to reflect the Unit 2 mechanical penetrations associated with the personnel airlock, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 '

Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No i Table 6.2.4 See Sheet No(s):17 ,

Description:

(Clarification)

Items 130, 131 and 131a are clarified to indicate that they are for Unit 1 only, Justification:

The Unit 2 design is indicated in items 133, 134 and 134a.

Group: 3 '

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 6.2.4-6 See Sheet No(s):18

Description:

(Revision)

Adds the Unit 2 personnel airlock mechanical penetra-trations (item #133, 134 bnd 134a).

Justification:

Updates the Table te reflect the Unit 2 mechanical penetrations associattd with the personnel airlock, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Numve ,91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.4-1 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Revision)

Justification:

Revises title block to indicate this figure now has 12 sheets (it previously had 11).

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 t- Related SER Section; 6.2,3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.4-1 See Sheet No(s):12 Des:ription: (Revision) i Adds Containment Isolation Valve arrangement 44 for the Unit 2 personnel airlock hydraulic system.

Justification:

See description for item 11 on page 6.2-92.

.Attachoent to TXX-92391' l September 4 1992 l Page.26 of 117

.FSAR Page (31 amended) Dassrintion Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.'

SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 6.2.4-1 See Sheet No(s):12

Description:

(Revision)

Aods containment Isolation Valve arrangement 45 for the Unit 2 personnel airlock equalization.

Justification:

See description for Unit 2 on page 6.2-91 and 92.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-039 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/ SEER Impact: No 6.3-3

Description:

(Update)

Inserts a discussion related to the motor operated valves in the ECCS that re-quire power lockout in order-to meet BTP-ICSB-18, and includes references to the related FSAR section where additional detailed informa-tion is located.

Justification:

This change reflects the update to Section 6.3 which indicates the commitment in TXX-88777 is completed and closed. The commitment was to determine if there were any NSSS or BOP valves, in addition to those currently included in Technical Specifications, which require power lockout in order to meet BTP-ICSB-18. This change relocates information contained in 0&Rs 040.8, 212.50, and 212.51.

Group: 4

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-745.2 Related SER Section: 6.3; SSER22 8.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.3-3

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Inserts the text of the second item contained in the response to e 4R 212.51 into FSAR Section 6.3.1.

Justification ,

This is an e 'ial change to-ready the Q&R Section for deletiir noen the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 L FSAR Change' Request Number: 92-138.6 Related SER Section: 6.3 l- SER/SSER Impact: No 6.3-15. 16

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Inserts the information contained in the responses to 0&Rs 212.53 and 212.55 into FSAR Section 6.3.2.2.12.

I Justification:

L This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section

Attachment to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 27 of 117 FS/.R Page

( Al AMAdtd) D1KE.iPil0B for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. '

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 138.7 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.3 16 Description (Update)

Inserts a discussion related to the motor operated valves in the ECCS that require power lockout in order to meet RTP-!CSB-18, and includes a reference to FSAR Chapter 15 where soditional dotailed information can be found.

Justification:

This change reflects the update to Section 6.3 which indicatas the commitment in TXX-88777 is completed and closed. The commitment was to determine if there were any NSSS or BOP valves, in addition to those currently included in the Technical Specifications, which require power lockout in order to meet BTP-ICSB-18.- This change relocates information from the response to 0212.51 to Section v.3.2.2.12.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92+745.3 Related SER Section: 6.3: SSER22 8.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 6.3 17 Description (0&R Incorporation)

Relocates the first paragraph from this page to page

-6.3-16 and inserts the information into the first para-graph of Section 6.3.t.2.12.

Justifications This is a relocet on of text which is referenced by the responses to 0040.8, 212.51. 212.53, and 212.55. This is an .ditorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change R* quest-Number: 92-138.1 Related SER St tion: 6.3 SER/SSER Impcet: No 6.3-18

Description:

(0$R Incorporation)

Inserts the information contained in the response to O&R 212.50 inte FSAR Section 6.3.2.5.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change RequSst Number: 92-138.8 Related SER Section: 6.3

.SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachaent to VXX 92391 Septeober 4, 1992 Page 28 of 117 FSAR Page

( Aft AEndid) ECKtiD119A 6.3-22

Description:

(Editorial)

A sentence has been added to reference the FSAR section which provides the details on leak detection.

Justification:

This change is only a cross reference.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 211 Related SER Section: 6.2.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 6.3 48

Description:

(0&R Incorporation) inserts the informatin contained in the response to O&Rs 212.51 and 212.55 into FSAR Section 6.3.5.5.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-138.9 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 6.3 3 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds the " Power lockout" requirement to the first ' tem, Accumulator isolation valves, in the third column.

Justification:

This is en editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. This is a relocation of information from 0&R 040.8. _

Group: 4 FSAR Chance Request Number: 92-138.10 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 6.3-1 See Sheet No(s):1, 2 and 4

Description:

(Revision)

Shows the installation of tubing on the discharge of various vent valves to minirize the potential for radiation contamination.

Justification:

This change adds 1/2 inch stainless steel tubing to existing valves that are utilized to vent various systems (e.g., RHR, CT, CVCS & SI). See justification provided for Figure 5.4-6.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 698 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 29 of 117

-FSAR Page (11 Agggdtd) Enscription 6.5 11, 12

Description:

(Revision) ;

The discussion of the number of spray nozzles in Region B, C and D has been updated to reflect the the amount of nozzles provided for Unit 2. :

Justification: ]

The overall reduction of 10 spray nozzles will not i impact the Containment Sprey System coverage. Refer to )

the justification for Table 6.2.2-1 for additional l information. !

Group: 3 j FSAR Change Request Number: 92 712 l Related SER Section: 6.5.2 i SER/SSER impact: No '

Table 6.5-5

Description:

(Revision)

The discussion of the number of spray nozzles in Region B. C and 0 and the total number of nozzles provided for Unit 2 has been updated to reflect as built conditions.

Justification:

The overall reductio:1 of 10 spray nozzles will not imnact the Containment Spray System coverage. Refer to the justification for Table 6.2.2-1 for additional information.

Group: 3 FSAR. Change Request Number: 92-712 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No figure'6.5 2 Descriptions (Revision)

Notes 4, 5 and 6 have been added to clarify the number of spray nozzles in Region B. C and D for Unit 2.

Justification:

The overall reduction of 10 spray nozzles will not impact the Containment Spray System coverage. Refer to the justification for Table 6.2.2-1 for additional i nf ormati or. .

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-712 Related SER Section: 6.5.2 SER/SSEP Impact: No

'7.1-10

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces reference to Table 7.5-7 with Tables 7.5-7A.B&C.

Justification:

Table 7.5-7 and 0&R Table 032.110-1,2&3 are deleted and information in these tables are incorporated in the new tables.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.33 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 3D of 117 FSAR Page (Al ARandtd) ERIStiption i 7.1 21, 22

Description:

(Editorial)

Adds applicable O&R response to FSAR text.

Justification:

O&R response is revised to reference the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 106.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 7.8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.1 2.3 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Correction)

The table is revised to re-instate the GDC 54 applica-bility to the Auxiliary Feedwater System instrumenta-tion.

Justification:

GDC 54 is applicable to the design / functional requirements of the auxiliary feedwater system instru-mentation. This change is made in accordance with TU Electric letter logged TXX 92249 dated May 21, 1992.

Group: 3 FSAR Change ReqLest Number: 90-211 '

Related SSER Section: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.1-2.4 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Correction) ,

The taDie is revised to re-instate the GDC 54 applica-bility to the Auxiliary Feedwater Systcm (AFW) instru- ;

mentation and also removes GDC 57 for the AFW, Relief.

Justification:

GDC 54 is applicable to the design / functional requiremerits of the Auxiliary feedwater system instru-mentation as desc 1 bed in TV Electric letter logged TXX-92249. dated tay 21, 1992. Because the AFW system is not a closed system GDC 57 is not applicable. Tnis change is consistent with SSER 22 section 7.1.2 Table 7.1-2 Sheet 1.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211 Related SSER Section: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 7.1-4

Description:

(Clarific? tion)

Revise SSPS logic drawing.

Justification:

I Provides schematic representation to clarify that the safety system inoperable indication logic circuitry is.such that the Drimary (Red Light) overrides the l Secondary (Amber Light) indication.

l Group: 3 L

1 R:

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 Septeaber 4, 1992 Page 31 of 117 FSAR Page (11 AI!!tRdid) ERLcription FSAR Change Request Number: 92-649 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.2 25

Description:

(Editorial)

Relocates correct information from O&R 040.046 response and revises old information to identify the response in the appropriate FSAR text.

Justi'ication:

O&R response is revised to reference the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-155.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.2-26

Description:

(Correction)

Remove Reference to the NIS detectors in section 7.2.1.2.2 Justification:

This change removes reference to the NIS detectors.

The N25 detectors are shown in Fig 7.1-3 sh 4,5. This change will achieve consistency with Figure 7.1-3 in the FSAR.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 546.01 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 7.2-1 See Sheet No(s):10-

Description:

(Update)

Change logic for circ water pumps from 3/4 to 2/4.

Justification:

Allows two circ water pumps in operation. During winter months the 3/4 cire water pump requirement excessively cools down the condensate thus two pumps will maintain condensate without excessive cooling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-717 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-1

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds the response to NRC question 032.82 to the FSAR texs section and references 0032.82 at the appropriate text containing the response.

Justification:

The response is relocated to the FSAR text section.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-115.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

-g

. ikg N himnt to EX 7391

, ,c;we A 1@g n two 1: a gt?

3 ' ' $p ,9 g j (11 Kiitutd) EtLGripllRQ 7.3 11, 28 See Page No(s):33, 37 & 42 Dt:scripti on: (0&R Incorporation)

Replaces reference to Table 7.5-7 with Tables 7.5-7A,B&C.

Justification:

Table 7.5 7 and Q&R Table 032.110 1.2&3 are deleted and information in these tables are incorporated in the new tables.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 197.34 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-18

Description:

(Editorial' Adds the appropriate text from 0032.042 response in the FSAR text.

Justification:

Q&R response is revised to reference the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-103.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3 19

Description:

(Update)

Adds phrase that indicates that SI sequence or 80 seg. !

will start the CR AC system.

Justificatior- 3 CR AC system is a common system and will actuate on l receipt of SI or BOS signal from either Unit.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-634.01 Related SER Section: 7.3: SSER22 7.3.1.9 i SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-21

Description:

(Update)

Adds phrase that indicates that SI sequence or 80 seq.

will start the CR AC system.

Justification:

CR AC system is a common system and will. actuate on receipt of SI or BOS signal from'either Unit.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 634.02 Related SER Section: 7.3: SSER22 7.3.1.9 l SER/SSER 1mpact: No 7.3-21 .

Description:

(Update)-

Adds phrase that indicates that SI sequence or B0 seq.

will initiate the CR Emergency Recirculation Mode Justification:

l CR AC system is a common system and will actuate on receipt of SI or BOS signal from either Unit.

Group 3 L

Attach;;nt to TXX 92391

'eptc bor 4, 1992 Page 33 of 117 FSAR Page (Al ARLnAgd) RcJgtjp1190 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-634.03 Related SER Section: 7.3: SSER22 7.3.1.9 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-23

Description:

(Update)

Adds phrase that indicates that SI sequence or B0 seq.

will initiate the CR Emergency Recirculation Mode Justification:

CR AC system is a common system and will switch to ER mode on receipt of 51 or 805 signal from either Unit.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-634.04 Related SER Section: 7.3: SSER22 7.3.1.9 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3-31

Description:

(Update)

Adds phrase that indicates that SI sequence will start the inlet dampers, exhaust fans, and filter assembly heaters associated with the primary plant ESF exhaust filters.

Justification:

the primary plant emergency filtratuon system is a common system that actuates on receipt of signal from either unit SI seq.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-634.05 Releted SER Section: 7.3: SSER22 7.3.1.9 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.3 58

Description:

(Update)

Adds phrase that indicates that SI sequence or 80 seq.

will start the Uninterruptable Power Supply Ventilation System Justification:

The UPS ver.tilation system is a common system that can be started by a SI or Blackout Sequence signal from either unit.

Group: 3 }

FSAR Chrlhge Request Number: 92-634.06 SER/SSE' Impact: No 7.3-59

Description:

(Update) ,

Adds phrase that indicates that SI sequence or B0 seq.

will start the Uninterruptable Power Supply Ventilation ac units and fans.

Justification:

The UPS ventilation system is a common system that can be started by a SI or Blackout Sequence signal from

, either unit.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-634.07 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach ent to TXX 92391 ,

S ptc ber 4, 1992 Page 34 of 117 FSAR Page (M Merittd) DUIrlRLiDD 7.3 69

Description:

(Editorial)

Revises the FSAR text section to contain the response to NRC question 0032.95.

Justification:

The response section is revised to refer to the FSAR text section.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 122.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 7.3.1-3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.3-4 See Sheet No(s):01 through 16

Description:

(Editorial)

Remove the Gibbs and Hill and/or the pre fuel load dwg drawing designators from the drawing prefixes (ie. "2323" and "ECE").

Justification:

Post fuel load there is no reason to differentiate between the G&H drawings and the TUE generated drawings Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 650.01 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.3-4 See Sheet No(s):04, 06 & 07

Description:

(Clarification)

Add Unit 2 drawing numbers to various valves.

Justification:

Adds U2 drawing numbers to valves that are actuated by ,

safety injection signal.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-650.U2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 7.3 4 See Sheet No(s):11

Description:

(Clarification) add unit 1 only designator to the HDAFW pump supply and exhaust dampers and valves.

Justification:

Based on engineering analysis, dampers for Unit 2 have been deleted from the Primary Plant Ventilation System on the supply and exhaust side of the system. Deletion of the dampers will reduce.the pressure drop through the. PPVS, and enhance the operability of the system to meet the requirement of the design air flows for the air borne contamination of the various areas of the plant.

l The corresponding dampers in Unit I were installed but l are abandoned in-place (no instrumentation or actuators remain) or do not serve any safety related function and l bave not been removed or locked open, l The deletion of the PPVS dampers will not idversely

Att6cnnent to TXX-92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 3F of 117 FSAR Page (M Astadtd) DRiCElPllRD affect the safe operation of the PPVS and the plant. I The deletion of dampers f rom the primary plant i ventilation system in Unit 2 was documented in j amendment 82 via FSAR change 91 045. j Group: 4 '

FSAR Change Request Number: 92 650.03 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 7.3 4 See Sheet No(s):14

Description:

(Correction) i Change the diesel generator referenced drawing from the M1 drawing to the El drawing.

Justification:

The Electrical El drawing is the drawing that has the SIS signal.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-650.04 SER/SSER impact: No Table 7.3 4 See Sheet No(s):16

Description:

(Addition)

Adds note to end of table.

Justification:

The note explains the similarity between the U1 and U2 drawing numbering schemes.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 650.05 SER/SSER Inpact: No Table 7.3-5 See Sheet No(s);01

Description:

(correction) corrects the containment spray pump- equip,nent ic.

Justification:

Corrects previous incorrect tag number for the containment spray pump. The pump itself is not changed Group: - 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-650.08 SER/SSER Impact: No

' Table 7.3-5 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 04 Descriptions (Editorial)

Remove the Gibbs and Hill and/or the pre fuel load drawing designators from the drawing prefixes (ie. "2323" and "ECE")

Justification:

Post fuel load there is no reason to differentiate between the G&H drawings and the TUE generated drawings

_ Group: 4 FSAR Chance Request Number: 92 650.06 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach ent to TXA 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 36 of 117 FSAR Page (11 A#t04td) Ef1FJr_iplig11 Table 7.3 5 See Sheet No(s):04

Description:

.sddition)

Adds note to end of table.

Justification:

The note explains the similarity between the U1 and U2 drawing numbering scheme.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-650.07 SER/SSER lupact: No Table 7.3 6

Description:

(Addition)

Adds note to end of table.

Justification:

The note explains the similarity between the U1 and U2 drawing numbering scheme.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-650.09 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.3 6

Description:

(Clarification)

Remove the Gibbs and Hill and/or the pre fuel load drawing designators from the drawing prefixes (ie. "2323" and "ECE").

Justification:

Post fuel. load there is no reason to differentiate between the G&H drawings and the TUE generated drawings Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-650.13 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.3-6 Description (Correction)

Delete HSIV bypass valve entries for Generatorc 1,2,3,4 Justification:

These valves are manually operated and normally closed.

This change is consistent w/ FSAR 10,3.2.4 and FSAR Fig.10.3-1. The valves were changed f rom auto to manual in A56 but the change was omitted from this tabl Group 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-650.11 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-18 See Page No(s):26 and 27

Description:

(Update)

Adds the Control Room HVAC Mechanical Equipment room to the list of rooms where, in the event of a fire, access may not be available back into the control room prior to initialization of cold shutdown.

Justification:

A loss of the HVAC Hechanical Equipment room would make the control room uninhabitable and would necessitate shutdown from outside the control room. This change is consistent with FSAR sect 7.4.1.3.1 (2).

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 37 of 117 FSAR Page

( A1 A'etnded) PS EI.1D.llqu Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-672.01 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 7.4-19 See Page No(s):18 and 20 through 28

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed in both the units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-672.0S SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-20 See Page No(s):18, JA, 23, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,27,28

Description:

(Clar.rication) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed for both units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 672.06 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-21 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26,27,28

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed for both units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-672.07 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-22 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26,27,28

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed for both units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-672.08 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach 3cnt to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 38 of 117-FSAR Page (31 amended) Description 7.4-23 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26,27,28

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed for bith units.

Group: 4 FSAR Chenge Request Number: 92-672.09 SErs/SSER Impact: No 7.4-24 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26,27,28

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed for both units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-672.10 SER/SSER Impact: No 7,4-25 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26,27,28

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire

. safe shutdown is addressed for both units. ,

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 672.11 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 7.4-26 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,27,28

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed for bath units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-672.12 SER/SSER Impact: No w

Attach ent to TXX-92391 Sspte:ber 4, 1992 Page 39 of 117 FSAR Page (A1 amended) Regrjplista 7.4 26. See Page No(s):18, and 27 '

Description:

(Update)

Adds the control Room HVAC Hechanieri Equipment room to the list of rooms where, in the event of a fire, access may not be available back into the control room prior '

to the initiation of cold shutdown.

Justification:

A loss of the HVAC Hechanical Equipment room would make the control room uninhabitable and would necessitate shutdown from outside the control room. This change is consistent with FSAR sect 7,4.1.3.1 (2).

Group 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 672.03 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-27

Description:

(Editorial)

Adds applicable portions of the response to NRC question to the FSAR text.

Justification.

The response is revised to refer to the FSAR text sections.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-87.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-27 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23. 24, 25,26,28 Descriptions (Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation, The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed-to reflect the f act that fire safe shutdown is addressed for both units.

Gr up: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 s/2.13 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.4-27 bee Page No(s):18 and 26

Description:

(Update)

Adds the Control Room HVAC Hechanical Equipment room to the list of rooms where, in the event of a fire, access may not be tvailable back into the control room prior to the initiation of cold shutdown.

Justification:

A loss of the HVAC Hechanical Equipment room would make the control room uninhabitable and would necessitate shutdown from outside the control room. This change is consistent with FSAR sect 7.4.1 1.1 (2).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 672.04 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 40 of.117 FSAR Page (11 Aginded) Description 7.4-28 See Page No(s):18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25,26,27

Description:

(Clarification) various changes to reflect two unit operation. The change includes changes to make the text grammatically correct.

Justification:

These changes are needed to reflect the fact that fire safe shutdown is addressed for both units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-672.14 SER/SSER impact: No Table 7.4-1 See Sheet No(s):1

Description:

(Addition)

Adds note 3 at footer of page 1 of table.

Justification:

This note explains the Unit tagging scheme for CPSES and how Unit designators are used.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-646.01 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4 1~ See Sheet No(s):1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Description:

(Addition)

Adds reference-to note 3 at column heading of where a unit designator is used in equipment.

Justification:

This reference to note 3 explains that for equipment having a unit designator in its tag number the labling scheme is similar between units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-646.04 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-2 See Sheet No(s):1

Description:

(Addition)

Adds note (*) at footer of page 1 of table.

Justification:

This note explains the Unit tagging scheme for CPSES and how Unit designators are used, Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-646.02 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.4-2 See Sheet No(s):1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7

Description:

(Addition)

Adds reference to note

at column heading of where a unit designator is used in equipment.

Justification:

This reference to note.* explains that for equipment having a unit designator in its tag number the labling scheme is similar between units.

Attachmtnt to TXX 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 41 of 117 FSAR Page (Al AEnd.ed) DescriptioD Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-646.05 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

-Table 7.4 2 See Sheet No(s):7

Description:

(Correction)

Corrects the tag number of the RHR discharge control valve controller.

Ji's ti fi c ati on:

The controller was incorrectly listed in Table 7.4-3 as HC 606, the correct designation is HC 606A. HC-606A is '

located at the HSP. HC-606 1s on the main control board.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-646.07 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7,4-3 See Sheet No(s):1

Description:

(Addition)

Adds note (*) at footer of page 1 ef table.

Justification:

This note explains the Unit tagging scheme for CPSES and how Unit designators are used.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 646.03 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 7.4-3 See Sheet No(s):1, 2, and 3

Description:

(Addition)

Adds reference to note

at col'un heading of where a unit cesignator is used in equipment.

Justification:

This reference to note

explains that-for equipment having a unit designator in its tag number the labling scheme is similar between units.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-646.06 SER/SSER Impact. No 7.5-2, 23

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces reference to Table 7.5-7 with Tables 7.5-7A,B&C, Justification:

Table 7.5 7 and Q&R Table 032.110 1,2&3 are deleted and information in these tables are incorporated in the new tables.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.35 i Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No

I Attachmont to TXX 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 42 of 117 I l

FSAR Page (Ai ARfRdtd) Descrintian !

7.5-23, 24

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds description on tables 7.5-7A D.C.D.E&F under FSAR section 7.5.3.6.

Justification:

These are new tables replacing Table 7.5 7 and O&R Tables 032.110-1,2,3,4,5&6.

L Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 197.36 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER impact: No Table 7.5 7 See Sheet No(s): 1 through 22

Description:

(Editorial)

Deletes the Table 7.5-7.

Justification:

Table 7.5-7 is replaced by 7.5 7A through F which correspond to O&P Tables 032.110 1 through 6 and Table 7.5-7.

Group: 4 FSAR Charge Request Number: 91-197.2 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7A See Sheet No(s):1 through 19

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the O&R Tabic 032.110 1.

Corrects lower instruments range for Dissolved Oxygen to 0.1 ppm on page 18 correcting typo.

Deletes column on Schedule being no longer applicable.

Adds column for R.G 1.97 type / category.

Justification:

0&R Table 032.110*1 is deleted.

R.G 1.97 type / category column is added because Table 7.5-7 is being deleted.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.27 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-7B See Sheet No(s):1 through 14

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the Q&R Table 032.110 2.

Corrects typo to identify the correct Steam Generator Sampling Isolation Valve Tag number HV-2406 on page 12.

Deletes the column on Schedule since no longer applies.

Justification:

0&R Table 032.110-2 is deleted.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.28 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 l

SER/SSER Impact: No

i Atta':hment to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 43 of 117 FSAR Page (AJ ##Anded) Reittigtlpa Table 7.5 /C See Sheet No(s):1 through 5 l

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the O&R Table 032.110-3.

Deletes INST from abbreviation since schedule of insta- ;

11ation is no longer applicable.

Justification:

O&R Table 032.110-3 is deleted.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 197.29 Related !:R Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5-70 See Sheet No(s):1 through 6

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the Q&R Table 032.110 4.

Adds column for Justification for clarity.

Justification:

O&R Table 032.1:0 4 is deleted.

Group: 4 FSAR Ch*nge Request Number: 91 197.30 Relate: SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSLR 1mpact: No Table 7.5 7E See Sheet No(s):1 through 6

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the Q&R Table 032.110 5.

Identifies title of the table for clarity.

Justification:

O&R Table 032.110-5 is deleted.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.31 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 7.5 7F See Sheet No(s):1 through 3

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the Q&R Table 032.110 6.

Deletes column CPSES Design and Justification being obsolete after Unit 1 fuel load.

Justification:

O&R Table 032.110 6 is deleted.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.32 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.6 4

Description:

(Editorial)

Identifies schematic wiring diagrams corresponding to the RHR Isolation Valve logic diagrams, Justification:

This information is relocated fron the Q&R 032.28 response to the FSAR text.

Attachnent to TXX-92391 Septenbor 4, 1992 Page 44 of 117 TSAR Page (M AMBdid) DMit.ipil9D Group: 4 .

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-93.2 l Related SER Section: 7.6: SSER22 7.6 JER/SSER Impact: No 7.6 14

Description:

(Editorial)

Identifies the schematic wiring diagrams corresponding to the Accumulator Isolation Valve functional block diagrams.

Justification:

This information is relocated from the O&R 032.28 response to the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR f'ange Request Number: 92-93.3 Related SER-Section: 7.6: SSER22 7.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 7.6-17

Description:

(Editorial)

Identifies the schematic wiring diagrams corresponding to the Safety Injection System Recirculation Sump Isolation' Valve logic diagrams.

Justification:

This informatiun is relocated from the O&R 032.28 response to the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 93.4 Relatec SER Section: 7.6; SSER22 7.6 SER/SSER Imp.ct: No Figure 7.7-14A

Description:

(Update) ~,

Revise Figure to include Unit 2 control room arrang(. men

.t Justification:

This change revises :he figure to reflect the panel arrangment for a dual unit.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-653 SER/SSER Impact: No 8,2-16

Description:

(Editorial)

Relocates the applicable information frem 0&R G40.049 ,

to the FSAR text-Justification:

O&R response is revised te reference the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-156.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach::nt to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 45 of 117 FSAR Page (M Amf114Cd) RCHIIPl19D 8.2 18,19

Description:

(Editorial)

Relocates information from O&R 040.52 response to the FSAR text and references 0040.52 at applicable areas of FSAR text only.

Justification:

O&R response is revised to reference the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-158.2 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.2-1 See Sheet No(s): sheets and 2

Description:

(Editorial)

Relocates table 040.49 1 sheets J and 2 from O&R section to FSAR section 8.2.

Justification:

GiR table 040.49-1 is deleted.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 156.3 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 8.3 8

Description:

(Correction)

Equipment capacities for safety related 480V motor control centers.

Justification:

Corrects the FSA1 text to reflect that interrupting current for certain common safety related motor control centers (HCC's). These MCC's can be electrically powered f rom Unit 1 or Unit 2 and have an interrupting g

, current rating of 24,000 amps. The other 480VAC HCC's have inte N}'pting current ratings of 25,000 amps.

Group: 3 b FSAR Change Fequest Number: 92-709.1 Related SSER Scction: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mptct: No Table 8.3-1A See Sheet No:s):02, 07

Description:

(Addition)

Fire s;te shutdown lighting requirements.

Justification:

The change to the diesel loading table reflects the additicr of new battery packs to the emergency lighting panels in the auxiliary and control buildings. The ad-ditional battery packs are required to meet Unit 2 fire safe shutdown requirements as described in APCSB 9 5,1, Appendix A, for 8-hour lighting provisions for egress and access routes. The load increase due to the addition of the new battery packs is 1.4kW, which result in a total diesel load of 5962.5kW.

t G.oup: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-635.1

Attach ent tn TXF y2391 SeptonLer 4, 1992 Page 46 6f 117 (SAR Pe00 (Ali Mtadr)) DMSClD119B Related SSER Section: SSER23 9.5.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1A See 5.hset No(s):02. 07

Description:

(Update)

Rerises Table 8.3-1A to reflect the deletion of non.

s4?ety related lord from safety-related common distri-betion panel XEC2.

Justification:

Figure 8.3 15A, Sh I was revised to delete the Unit 2 Ann-Logic cabinet (2-CR-09) load from common distribu-tion panel XEC2. This change is required to prevent transmission of a short circuit fault on Unit 2 to pro-pagate to Unit 1 or the common panel, in addition.

Since the load is non safety related, removal of the loa 5 results in the load not fron being fed from a safety related source during accident conditions. /.s a result, this load reduced the total diesel generatar load by approximately 6.6kVA/5.6kW.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 683.3 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1B See Sheet No(s):02, 07

Description:

(Update)

Revises Table 8.3-18 to reflect the deletion of non-safety related load from safety related common distri-bution panel XEC2.

JJstifiCation:

Figure 8.3 15A. Sh I was revised to delete the Unit 2 Ann Logic cabinet (2 CR 09) load from common distribu-tion panel XEC2. This change is required to prevent transmission of a short circuit fault on Unit 2 to pro-pagate to Unit 1 or the commone panel. In addition, since the load is non safety related. removal of the load results in the load not from being fed f rom a safety related source during accident conditions. As a result, this load reduced the total diesel generator load by approximately 6.6kVA/S.6kW.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 683.4 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact:-No Table 8.3-1B See Sheet No(s):02, 07 Description (Addition)

Fire safe shutdown lighting requirements.

Justification:

The change to the diesel loading table reflects the L addition of new battery packs to the emergency lighting L panels in_the auxiliary and control buildings. The ad-

l l

Attach:Ont to TXX 92391 Septc ber 4, 1992 Page 47 of 117 F$AR Page (41 DetnjtO RingdpM9D ditional battery packs are required to meet Unit 2 fire safe shutdown requirements as descrit:ed in APCSB 9.5.1, Appendix A, for 8 hour9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months lighting provisions for egress and access routes. The load increase due to the addition of the new battery packs is 1.4kW, which result in a total diesel load of 6045.3kW.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 635.2 Related SSER Section: SSER23 9.5.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 8.3-1B hoe Sheet No(s):07 DescripMon (Editorial)

Correction to the "as required load demand" Justification:

Corrects the Table to reflect the correct the "as required load demand" for the diesel generator. In a previous amendment, a typographical error was made in which the "as required load demand" 6048.4kW. The correct value is 7.3kW, os indicated in other diesel loading tables and the design basis document for the diesel generator.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 683.6 Related SSER tection: SSER22 8.3.1 )

SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 8.3 2 See Sheet No(s):02, 09

Description:

(Addition) _

Fire safe shutdown lighting requirements.

Justification:

The change *.o the diesel loading table reflects the addition of new battery packs to the emergency lighting panels in the auxiliary and control buildings. The ad-ditional battery packs are required to meet Unit 2 fire safe shutdown requirements as described in APCSB 9.5.1.

Appendix A, for 8-hour lighting provisions for egress ano access routes. The load increase due to the addition of the new battery packs is 1.4kW, which result in a total diesel load of 6237.9kW. '

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-635.3 Related SSER Section: SSER23 9.5.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):03, 09

Description:

(Update)

Revises Table 8.3-2 to reflect the deletion of non-safety related load from safety-related common distri-bution panel XEC2.

Justification:

Figure 8.3 15A, Sh I was revised to delete the Unit 2

Attach snt to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 48 of 117 FSAR Page (11 ARtadtd) Et1Etjptio_0 Ann Logic cabinet (2-CR 09) load from common distribu-tion panel XEC2. This change is required to prevent j transmission of a short circuit fault on Unit 2 to pro- j pagate to Unit I or the common panel. In addition, since the load is non safety related, removal of the load results in the load not from being fed from a safety related source during accident conditions. As a j result, removal of this load reduced the total diesel ,

generator load by approximately 6.6kVA/5.6kW. J Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-683.5 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table-8.3-2 See Sheet No(s):06, 11 Descriptions (Correction)

Start times for the primary plant vent exhaust fan and primary plant ESF heater loads.

Justification:

This change revises the " BLACK 0UT" loading table for primary plant vent exhaust fan and primary plant ESF heater. When one Unit has a BLACK 0UT coincident with a LOCA in the other Unit, these loads will start at 40 seconds instead of 120 seconds,.since the unit loads assoc 1Gted with the Unit receiving the safety injection signal due to a LOCA, will load onto the diesel at 40 seconds. The diese' 4ep transient (i.e.,

running load plus inrush of lutds being added) at 40 seconds is well-below the acceptable tested limit of 8560kW. This transient is present only during the load start period. The continuous load of the diesel is still less than 6300kW, which is consistent with-the CPSES 3/4.8.1 Technical Specification requirements.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 635.4 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER impact: No

~ Figure B.3-11 See SFeet No(s);01. 02, 03 Description (Update)

Changes to plant drawings which do not affect FSAR figures.

Justification:-

In an effort to minimize the number of drawings required to be .pdated when a modification is implemented. TV Electric has elected to establish criteria for when FSAR figures require updating.

Specifically, site procedures state that when the FSAR L figure is not a reproduction of a plant drawing, a l figure update is not required provided that the F3AR l figure remains functionally ccrrect and the information

!=

on the figure remains correct. Figure 8.3 11 is not

Attachacnt to TXX 92391 Septc;bor 4, 1992 Page 49 of 117 FSAR Page (n . net 04ed) Duniption a reproduction of its associated plant drawing. To eliminate the need to reproduce the FSAR figure, the associated plant drawing is being provided to reflect a substantative change to the facility as described in the FSAR. Based on the above criteria. 9ther changes are included on the plant drawings, such as renumbering of the figure notes, etc., which meet the above criteria, but do not have specific change descriptions.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-709.3 Related $$ER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-11 See Sheet No(s):01, 02, 03

Description:

(Revision)

Design of automatic transfer circuits for common motor control centers.

Justification:

The design for safety related common MCC transfer switches has been revised since the original design involved a potential personnel hazard. In the original design the door selector switch for the transfer switch was powered directly from an 480VAC supply without any protection. In the new design, the selector switch is powered from 120VAC with fuse protection. The modification was internal to the existing transfer switches and therefore, previcas evaluations, such as electrical separation and fire safe shutdown combus-tible loading remains valid. Note that these MCC's can be electrically powered from either Urit 1 or Unit 2.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number:-92-709.2 Related 3SER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3 14A See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Addition)

Revised DC_ emergency seal oil pump horsepower rating.

Justification:

The main generator seal oil system pumps have been replaced with similar rotary, screw type positive

' displacement pumps. The seal oil system is non-safety and includes three AC driven and one DC driven pumps.

The existing pumps are no longer manufactured and spare and replacement parts are not readily avcilable. Where possible, t<isting cable, conduit, piping, etc., will be used. The horsepower rating for the new DC pump has increased from 11.4 to 15 hp. With the increase in horsepower rating, cable ampacity, voltage drop and battery loading remains acceptable.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-590

I Attachrent to TXX 92391 Scpte:ber 4, 1992 ,

Page 50 of 117 l FSAR Page (A1 A93nded) D11GIlP1Lg.D Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3 j SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3 15A See Sheet No(s):01 l

Description:

(Update)

Retermination of Unit 2 equipment on Figure 8.3-15A.

Justification:

The Figure update reflects retermination of Unit 2 wires in panel XEC2. Since the existing cable was not long enough the existing cable (NK006666) was spliced with another cable (NK006666A) to make the termination.

Panel XEC2 is fed from a common motor control center which can be powered from either Unit 1 or Unit 2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-683.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3 15A See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Update)

Revises Figure 8.3-15A to reflect the deletion of non-safety-related load from safety-related common distibu-tion panel XEC2.

Justification:

Figure revised to delete the Unit 2 Ann Logic cebinet (2-CR-09) load from common distribution panel XEC2.

This change is required to prevent transmission of a short circuit faul+. on Unit 2 to propagate to Unit 1 or the common panel. In addition, since the load is non safety related, removal of the load results in the load not from being fed from a safety-related source during accident conditions. As a result, removal of-this load reduced the total diesel generator load by approximately 6.6kVA/5.6kW.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 683.2 Related SSER Sectirn: SSER22 8.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 8.3-15A See Sheet No(s):02 Dest'iption: (Revisicn)

Update FSAR Figure 8.3-15A. Sheet 2 to reflect the retermination of cables which interface between Units 1 and 2, Justification:

This change will make the FSAR Figure agree with the respective plant drawing. Refer to the justification for Pages 8.3-17 and 18 for additional information.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-704 Related SER Section: 8.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

Attach ent to TXX 92391 S pte bsr 4. 1992 Page 51 of 117 FSAR Page (n .aMDdtd) Description 9.1-1 See Page No(s):1 through 65

Description:

(Clarification)

Incorporates the latest methodologies for refueling and removes unnecessary detailed descriptions on the equipment and procedure.

Justification:

Implementation of this change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a suberitical array. The FSAR will remain in conformance with the requirements for fuel storage and handling.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682 Related SER Section: 9.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.1-2 Descriptions (Clarification)

Deletes the discussion (from Section 9.1.1, New Fuel Storage) of the movement of new fuel assemblies for inspection and the removal of " protective covers to ,

allow visual inspection in order to confirm that the assembly has not been damaged during shipment".

Justification:

This change removes unnecessary detailed information that does not describe the subject facilities. New Fuel Storage. The deleted information does not address the design of the facilities or fuel handling requirements.

implementation of this change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to main-tain a subcritical array. The FSAR will remain in conformance with the requirements for fuel storage as d handling.

Group 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682.1 Related SER Section: 9.1.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.1-7

Description:

(Clarification)

Deletes the discussion (from Section 9.1.2. Spent Fuel Storage) of the movement of spent fuel assemblies from Containment to the Fuel Building for storage or inspection prior to storage in the spent fuel storage rack.

Justification:

This change removes unnecessary detailed information that does not describe the subject facilities. Spent Fuel Storage. The deleted information does not address the design of the facilities or fuel handling equip-ment, This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a suberitical array. The FSAR will remain in conformance

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 Septc1 er 4, 1992 Page 52 of 117 FSAR Page (Al Aetndsd) Dgser1Dt[pD ,

I with the requirements for fuel storage and handling. l Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 682.2 Related SER Section: 9.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.1 8

Description:

(Q&R Incorporation)

Relocates the response to 0312.13 to FSAR Section 9.1.

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 270.2 Related SER Se: tion: 9.1.2.2: SSER22 9.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.1 9

Description:

(Clarification)

Deletes the discussion (from Section 9.1.2, Spent Fuel Storage) of the movement of spent fuel assemblies from the spent fuel storage to a spent fuel shipping cack and deletes the discussion of the receipt, cleaning, and loading of a spent fuel shipping cask.

Justification:

> This change removes unnecessary detailed information that does not describe the subject facilities, Spent Fuel Storage. The deleted information does not address the design of the facilities or fuel handling equip-ment. This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a subcritical array. The-FSAR will remain in conformance with the requirements for fuel storage and handling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682.3 Related SER Section: 9.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.1-15 Description (Clarification)

Deletes the discussion (from Section 9.1.3 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling anf Cleanup Systcm) of pumping water from the RWST to the refueling cavity and back to the RWST using the RNR pump and the reactor coolant drain tank pump.

l Justification:

l This change removes unnecessary detailed information that does not describe the subject facilities. Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System. The deleted

, information does not address the design and use of the L the subject facilities. This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a subtritical array. The FSAR will remain in conformance with the requirements for fuel storage and handling.

Attach::nt to TXX 92391

.5:pte:ber 4, 1992 Page 53 of 117 FSAR Page (al spended) Descriotion i I

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 682.4 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.1-15

Description:

(Clarification)

Changes Section 9.1.3.2 to indicate that the spent fuel pools are filled with water of "approximately" the same boron concentration as that of the RWSTs and deletes the statements describing the source of borated water, i.e., the bks or the RWSTs.

Justification:

This change removes unnecessary detailed information that does not describe the subject facilities Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System. The deleted text was not relevant to this section of the-the FSAR.

This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to amintain a subcritical array. The FSAR will remain in conformance with the

,aquirements for fuel storage and handling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682.5 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.1 16

Description:

(Clarification)

Deletes the statement. "Normally only one pool is loaded and one half of the installed cooling equipment is in service" from Section 9.1.3:3, Justification:

This change removes unnecessary detailed information that does not contribute to discussion in this section This statement was not relevant to the FSAR section which discussed the safety evaluation analysis of the Spent Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System. This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions-necessary to maintain a subcriticl array.

The FSAR will remain in conformance with the require-ments for fuel storage and handling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682.7 Related DER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No l 9.1-16 See Page No(s):23 and 24.

Description:

(Clarification)

Deletes Items 1 through 20 from Section 9.1.3.2.1 and retains the references to related FSAR sections where information on these components and systems is found.

Justification:

This change removes unnecessary detailed information that does not describe the subject facilities. Spent

Attach::nt to TXX-92391 Septc;btr 4. 1992 Page 54 of 117 ,

FSAR Page (AS AsJndtd) DMttifl1911 Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System. The deleted text did not contribute to the description of the subject system. This text change will not chance the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a suberitical array. The FSAR will remain in confor-mance with the r:quiremer.. for fuel storage and .

handling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 682.6 Related SER Section: 9.1.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.1-22, 23

Description:

(Clarification)

Changes the discussion in Section 9.1.4.2.1 to make editorial changes to the description of fuel movements using the equipment located in the refueling canal and deletes a discussion of fuel movements through the fuel tranfer tube and in the Fuel Building.

Justification:

This change updates the discussion information related to the fuel handling equipment. This change also deletes statements which were not relevant to the FSAR discussion of the Fuel Handlino equipment. The deleted information was only specific to the smaller tools used in fuel handling. This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a subcritical array. The FSAR will remain in conform-ance with the requirements for fuel storage and hand-ling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682.8 Related SER Section: 9.1.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 9.1 23, 24

Description:

(Clarification)

Changes the discussion in Section 9.1.4.2,2 to make editorial changes to the discussion of criticality protection and shielding for refueling operations ad includes use of references to the specific requirements located in the Technical Specifications.

Justification:

This change updates the discussion information related to refueling operations. The requirements remain unchanged and are either referenced to the Technical Specifications or clarified in the discussion. The information which was deleted was not relevant to this discussion and is referenced to the Technical Specifi-cations. This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a suberitical array. The FSAR will remain in conformance with the requirements for fuel storage and handling.

Group: 4 4

l l

Attachment to TXX-92391 Septenber 4.-1992 Page 55.of 117

-FSAR Page

~ (M Amt0.dsd) Discription J

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682.9 Related SER Section: 9.1.4 SER/SSEh Impact: No 9.1-25

Description:

(Edito al)

Changes the discussion in Section 9.1.4.2.2 to make editorial changes to the discussion of " fuel and insert components".

Justification:

This change updates the discussion information related to refueling operations. The requirements remain unchanged and are clarified in the discussion, ibi s text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintain a subtritical array.

The FSAR will remain in ccnformance with the require -

ments for fuel storage and handling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request. Number: 92-682.10 Related SER Stction: 9.1.4 SER/SSER Impact: Ne 9.1-26

Description:

(Editorial)

Changes the s3cond paragraph of Section 9.1.4.2.3. sub-section 1 to delete the specific model reference to the

" Westinghouse 500 Line Thyristor Control".

Justification:

This is an editorial change to remove the specific model -name of the AC static control device used in the refueling machine from the discussion.

Group: 4

-FSAR Change-Request Mumber: 92-682.11 Related SER Section: 9.1.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.1-32

Description:

(Editorial)-

Deletes the last sentence of Section 9.1'.4.2.3. sub-section 13. "The Container Sealing Tool is usually stored on a nearby rack on the spent fuel pool wall".

Justification:

This is an editorial change to remove the' unnecessary detail of information from the discussion of the

" Damaged Fuel Containers". This text change will not change the design criteria or the provisions necessary to maintian a subcritical array. The FSAR will remain in conformance with the requirements for fuel storage and handling.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-682.12 Related SER Section: 9.1.4.

SER/SSER Impact: No

L Attach:ent to TXX-92391 Septenbar 4, 1992 Page 56 of 117 FSAR Page (n Ampndqd) RescriAtlp_rt 9.2-19

Description:

(Addition)

Add filter /demineralizer skid to Component Cooling Water System (CCWS) for Unit 2 chemistry control.

Justification:

The filter /demineralizer skid is needed for Unit 2 chemistry control and will be located in the non-safeguard loop of CCWS. It will not affect the safe-guard function and operability of CCWS.

Group: 3 FSAR Ch,79e Request Number: 92-618.1 Related SER Section: 9.2.2: SSER22 9.2.2 SER/5SER 1mpar' No Figure 9.2-1 See Sheet No(s):01 '

Description:

(Addition)

Add second sparger for the Chlorination Injection System in the Service Water Intake Strucyure (SWIS),

Justification:

Addition of the sparger will allow for a more equitable distribution of chemicals to each of the four Station Service Water System Trains.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-715 Related SER Section: 9.2.1: SSER22 9.2.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-3 See Sheet No(s):06.06A

Description:

(Addition)

Add filter /demineralizer skid to Component Cooling _

Water System (CCWS) for Unit 2 chemistry control.

Justification:

The filter /demineralizer skid is needed for Unit 2 chemistry control and will be located in the non-safeguard loop of CCWS It will not affect the safe-guard function and operability of CCWS.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-618.2 Related SER Section: 9.2.2: SSER22 9.2.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.2-4A 3ee Sheet No(s):04,06

Description:

(Addition)

Replace the existing Surface Water Hypochlorite System injection pumps and its piping.

Justification:

The existing puinps are too large to effectively control the current chlorination demands. The new pumps will provide the estimated normal flow rate of 2 gph of sodium hypochlorite with surer control. The new chemical injection lines are routed to two new injection points in the Surface Water Pump's discharge j line. The injection points are designed to minimize the '

, - , , :s p<v j

Q,, -

H

' Attach 3entLto? TXX-92391f 1 September 4, 199_P.~ j

iPageL57 offl17 i l k i LFSAR Page '

1(Al ALetHAR51): P_tieriotion occurance.and consequence of. clogging. The new pumps and piping are located in the Circulating Water ,

Chlorination Building and pipe trench.

Group : - 3_. . . ,

~

FSAR Change-Request Number: 92-692.1 j

_Related SER Section: 9.2 '

SER/SSER Impact!'No Figure 9.2-5l .See' Sheet No(s):5

Description:

. (Addition)

' Revise _ figure-to reflect plant design modification that

. installed sample sinks and associated flush and drain 2 lines.

Justification:

Plant enhancement -to improve the ability to provide--

adequate sampling and minimize the potential for spills and contamination due to sampling.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-131.2

!SER/SSER Impact: No

. Figure; 9.'2-5 See~ Sheet No(s):6

Description:

(Addition): ,

Revise figure to reflect plant design modification that1 ,

-installed: sample sinks and_ associated flush and drain- .

lines.

Justification:

-Plant enhancement-to improve the ability to provide-adequate _ sampling-and: minimize ~the potential for spills

-and contamination due-to sampling.

Group: 3 _

FSAR Change Request Number:= 91 - 131~. 3.

SER/SSER . Impact: No

9.3-2 See=Page No(s):03'

-Description:-(Revision)-

Revise the instrument air. supply quality as follows:

'1) A.t_the outlet of_ dryer: oil free and cleaned to remove particulate using one micron filters'which are 98% or greater efficient.L2) ~ At the components: Air

_ _ quality as per-the manufacturer *s tecommendations.

LJustification.

The: current requirement of instrument air quality,- t

' cleaned free of particulate greater than one micron *,

can be interpreted to mean that at any point in the.

system, any particulate that may be present will be

, of one micron or smaller. Given the extensive layout of the Instrument Air System and the presence of'small 4

amounts of corrosion products.. air of that quality cannot be consistently attained and is, in fact, not.

necessary. Manufacturers of downstream instrument air components. typical 1y recommend a particulate criteria k

t4 5 w -

y

W<

t Attach ent to TXX 92391 September 4. 1992 Page [8-of 117 FSAR Page (11 amended) agscription of approximately 40 micron with a few specifying smaller values in the 10 micron range. If required, <

additional filtration is available for those components having more restrictive air quality requirements. This change proposes that instrument air supplied to the system (i.e., at the outlet of the dryers) will nominally meet the one micron criteria by utilizing currently installed one micron filters having 98%

efficiency or greater. Also the quality of air supplied at the component instruments will meet the air quality criteria as per the components manufacturer recommendations.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-673 Related SER Section: 9.3.1: SSER23 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-8

Description:

(Update)

Add ' return pressure contro11er' in lieu of ' supply to' to the Componen* Cooling Water (CCW) safety chillers.

Justification:

Update the FSAR to be consistent with Section 9.2.2.5.3

. Figure 9.2-3 and SDAR CP-86-18.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-616.1 Related SER Section: 9.3.1: SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3 11

Description:

(Clarification)

Add 'for active valves' to the sesimic qualification of the valve actuator mechanisms in the Instrument Air System.

Justification:

Clarify the seismic qualification of the active valves of the Instrument Air System, which is consistent with Section 3.9B and Table 17A-1.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-616.2 Related SER Section: 9.3.1: SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3 11 Descrip':on: (Update)

Delete response to 0212.83 and adds reference and revised the section where the information contained in

the response is located.

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-051.2 Related SER Section 9.3.1: SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachtsnt to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 59 of 117 FSAR Page (As Amended) Descriptio3 9.3 27

Description:

(Addition)

Addition of drains to the new chemistry instrument laboratory equipments.

Justification:

New lab _ requires drain service to meeet the design conditions.

Group: 3 !

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-608.5 Related SER Section: 9.3: SSER22 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.3-67

Description:

(Revision)

Adds relief valves to the suction side of the Unit 2 centrifugal and positive displacement charging pumps.

Justification:

The relief valves are a new ASHE III Code requirement for overpressure protection of pump suction piping in the event check valve leakage. The C ' cht e went into effect after Unit I licensing.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-652 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 9.3-3 See Sheet No(s):01.02,03

Description:

(Correction)

1) Reviso the FHEA for power-operated relief valves to delete the safety valves provided and misc. changes.

2) Add the failure mode for Hain Steam Isolation Valve.

3) Hisc.. editorial changes to Aux. Feedwater System.

4) Delete SSWS recirc and screen wash valve FMEA.

Justification:

1) Revision to HSSS PORV remark is required to be consistent with Section 5.4.7.2.3 (includes pressure and temperature), Section 15.6.2 and Figure 15.0-24

2) Air supply is required to keep hydraulic pump running. This change is consistent with Section 10.3.2.3.

3) Update to change from ' manual control to manual isolation' for the Motor and Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater pumps discharge valves, and isolation valve for HSSS to AFS pump turbine.

The safety function is faulted Steam Generator isolat-ion as per Section 6.2, SSER 17 (Appendix A, item F-12, page 112), Sections 10.4.9.2 (page 10.4-85), and Section 10.3.2.6.

4) Delete the FHEA for SSWS recirculation line control valve and screen wash header control valve, as they are declassified to non-safety and abondened in-place. This change is consistent with Section 9.2.1.

Group: 3

Attachment to TXX 92391 l Scptte,bar 4, 1992

=Page-60 of 117 FSAR Page (al Amendsd)- Description FSAR Change Request Number: 92-616.3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1: SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):05

Description:

(Revision)

Revises normal valve position cf air supply to level control valve for the TDAFWP steam supply drain pot from normally open to normally closed.

Justification:

See description provided fo- Figure 10.3-1 (Sheet 2).

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-678 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-1 See Sheet No(s):16

Description:

(Addition)

Additica of instrument air to new chemistry instrument laboratory equipments.

Justification:

New lab requires IA air services to meet the design conditions.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-608.3 Related SER Section: 9.3.1: SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-4 See Sheet No(s):3A

Description:

(Addition)

-Add' level probe and speed ( -ntroller to sample reclaim pump in Process Sampling System.

Justification:

The existing sample reclaim pump does not have suffici-

-ent capacity to drain the sample reclaim tank. The excess flow ove; flows into floor drain tank #1 which is processed as radioactive waste. In order to accommodate the additional flow a pump, motor, and speed controller has been provided. This change will not affect the sample flow into the tank or the function of the Process Sampling System. This change is implemented on Unit 2 and'is being reviewed for Unit 1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-599 Related SER Section: 9.3.2: SSER22 9.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-5 See Sheet No(s):01.02

Description:

(Addition)

Add level switches 1-LS-5142-3 and 1-LS-5152-3 to i

Containment Sumps No. 1 and 2 respectively.

Justification:

i I'

i

Attach:ent to TXX-92391 Septc:ber 4, 1992 Page 61-of 117.

FSAR Page f n Amt.n_ded) DescriDtion Addition of-the new level switches will use three probe instead of existing two probes. This enhancement will improve the Containment Drain System reliability and will reduce frequency of calibration maintenance. This change is implemented on Unit 2 and the impact of this change on Unit 1 is being reviewed.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-700 Related SER Section: 9.3.3: SSER06 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-6 See Sheet No(s):2

Description:

(Addition)

Revise figure to reflect plant design modification that installed sample sinks and associated flush and drain lines.

Justification:

Plant enhancement to improve the ability to provide adequate sampling and minimize the potential for spills and contamination due to sampling.

Group: _3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-131.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Addition)

Adds sodium analyzer sampling line.

Justification:

See description provided for page 10.4-41.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-640 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01.02

Description:

(Addition)

Cap the existing floor drains under lab sink and add vent lines from new instrument lab sinks.

Justification:

The three drains for lab sinks are located under the new cabinet / sink funiture and are. capped to preclude materials being used in the lab entering the floor drain system. The new lab is an extension of the existing Hot / Cold lab facility. It will be used to perform activities previously performed in the existing labs. The vents and drains have been routed to the same locations as the other labs and therefore will not have no affect on the Vents and Drains System or any system with which it interacts.

Group: 3 l FSAR Change Request Number: 92-643

! Related SER Section: 9.3.3: SSER6 9.3.3 l

~ Attach 3ent to TXX-92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 62 of 117--

FSAR Page-(11 amended)- Desctlption SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-8 See Sheet No(s):01,02 Descr1ption: (Addition)

Addition of Drains to the new chemistry instrument laboratory.

Justification:

New lab requires drains services to meet the design conditions.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-608.2 Related SER Section: 9.3: SSER22 9.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 9.3-8 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Correction)

Revised the following for new chemistry laboratory:

1) Drain tie-in rerouted to the cold lab drains.

2) Drain line size has been changed from 2" to a 1-1/2" 3i Vent lines have been changed from 3/4" to 1-1/2".

Justification:

1) Drain branches are easily accessible and empty dire-ctly into the drain header. Therefore, the drains will continue to be routed to the same location as the Hot and Cold labs as originally designed.

2) The reduction in size of the drain line from 2" to 1-1/2" will not affect system design or operation. the trap connections are 1-1/2" and one of the two sinks is a cup sink and has limited drainage. Therfore, the 1/2*. drain line is sufficient.

3) Vents for drainage systems are required to be a minimum of 1-1/2". The 1-1/2" vents will maintain the-water seals (traps) full of water and will render the design consistent with the vents in the other labs.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-703 Related SER Section: 9.3.3: SSER06 9.3.3

~SER/SSER Impact: No

' Figure-9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):03

Description:

(Revision)

Adds relief valves to the suction side of the Unit 2 -

L centrifugal and positive displacement charging pumps.

Justification:

The relief valves are a new ASHE III Code requirement for overpressure protection of pump suction piping in the event check valve leakage. The Code change went into effect after Uni #. I licensing.

L Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-652 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

AttachnentLto TXX-92391-

Scptembor 4, 1992 j Page 63 of 117.

__FSAR Page' (11 Amended)- Qgscription Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):03

Description:

(Correction)

Replace the existing solenoid operated globe valves (1-HV-8220,8221) with solenoid operated gate valves.

These valves are installed on the high point vent-line from'the suction piping of the centrifugal charging pump and positive displacement pump to-gas space of VCT Justification:

The design requirement of the solenoid operated valves, if closed, are to isolate the flow in the forward and reverse flow diections. The existing globe valves are not designed to isolate against flow in the reverse flow direction. This could lead to the possible gas entrainment into the centrifugal charging pump suction'

! during safety injection, thereby gas binding the pump.

L -The replacement solenoid operated gate valves, when closed, isolate against flow in both the forward and

-reverse directions, thus gas entrainment into the centrifugal charging pump suction will not occur. This change is implemented on Unit 2 and the impact of this change on Unit 1 is being reviewed.

Group: 3 FSAR-Change Request Number: 92-626 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):03

Description:

(Revision)

Shows the-installation of tubing on the discharge of

'various vent-valves to minimize the potential for radiation-contamination.

Justification:

This change adds-1/2_ inch stainless steel tubing-to existing valves that are utilized to vent various systems (e.g. , RPR, CT, CVCS & - 51) . See justification provided for Figure 5.4-6.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request _ Number: 92-698 Related SER Section: 9.3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

_ Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s?: 06

Description:

(Addition)

Add sample sink, piping and valve to provide for sampling of the Boric Acid Blender.

Justification:

At present sampling of the Boric Acid Blender is done by a-drain valve not int 6nded for sampling. Addition of an adequate set-up for sampling including isolation valves, sansple sink, and drain line will enhance

sampling capabilities of the Boric Acid Blender, while l

'AttachInt to TXX-92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992

-Page 64 of 117 FSAR Page

-(ai nmended) Descriptjan containing any resultant spills or contamination. This chango is being reviewed for implementation on Unit 1 and will be reviewed for Unit 2 after Unit 2 fuel load.

Group: 3-FSAR Change Request Number: 92-684 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-10 See Sheet No(s):08

Description:

(Correction)

Replace 1) The existing ' diaphragm' valves with the

' globe

valves located between boric acid transfer pumps. 2) the existing ' globe' valves with the

' diaphragm' valvos located between boric acid tank and boric acid pumps.

Justification:

To mitigate potential pump to pump interactions (Boric Acid Transfer Pumps) a globe valve _will be placed in each pump's miniflow line. The valve will be throttled to establish the_ required mini-flow for each pump, mitigating pump to pump interactions.

In addition, the currently installed globe valves are replaced with the diaphargm valves, located between_the.

transfer pumps and boric' acid tank. This replacement' has minimal effect on the system performance, while continuing to provide the current degree of system flexibility. This modofications to the system will improve the subsystem flow characteristics and correct a potential-pump to pump interaction mechanism.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number:-92-630 Related SER Section: 9.3.4 SER/SSER Impact: No-Figure 9.3 See Sheet'No(s):01

Description:

(Addition)

Revise figure to reflect plant design modification that installed sample sinks and associated flush and drain lines.

Justification:

Plant enhancement to improve the ability to provide adequate sampling and minimize the potential for spills and contamination dce to sampling.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-131.5

~

SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.3-11 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Revision)

Adds relief valves to the suction side of the Unit 2 centrifugal and positive displacement charging pumps.

Justification:

Attachment to TXX-92391 Septenber 4, 1992 Page 65 of 117 FSAR Page ,

(M AmCRdid) . D21ET_iEt1911 l T*.c relief valves.are a new ASME III Code require:.ient for overpressure protection of pump suction piping in the event check valve-leakage. The Code change went into effect after Unit I licensing.

Group: 2

-FSAR Change Request Number: 92-652 Related SER Section: 9.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-10

Description:

(Update)

Add phrase to indicate that tFe CR AC system switches to Emergency recirc on actuation from either unit by a SI signal.

Justification:

The CR AC is a common system and can thus be actuated by a signal from unit 1 or unit 2 Group: 3 FSAR Change Requett Number: 92 634.08 SER/SSER Impact. No 9.4-23

Description:

(Update)

Adds phrase to indicate that the on a LOCA the aux bldg ventilation supply and exhaust fans will trip-automaticelly on receipt of a SI signal.

Justification:

Aux b1dg ventilation is a common system and thus will actuate on receipt of SI signal from either unit.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-634.09 Related SER Section: 9.4.3: SSER22 9.4.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4-30

Description:

(Update)

Adds phrase to indicate that the sfgds bldg ESF exhaust fans will actuate on receipt of a LOCA from either unit.

Justification:

Sfgds ventilation is a common system and thus will actuate on receipt of SI signal from either unit.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-634.10 Related SER Section: 9.4.4: SSER22 9.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-2 See Sheet No(s):04

Description:

(Correction)

Restoration of Unit 2 Safeguaros Building Primary Plant Ventilation and Auxiliary Building HVAC supply and exhaust for Unit 2 Rooms 100 and 107. Remove the blank off plates and restore flex connections from Unit I ductwork to Unit 2 Safeguards Building ductwork.

Justification:

I

~

Attachmen9.'to.TXX-92391- )

Septombor 4, 1992 l Page 66 o'-117,

.FSAR Page

'( A1 AeJlto. dad) D31Cr_!l!ti on Restoration of flex connections and/or registers and removal of blank off plates in rooms 100 and 107 is required for the completion and~ future operation of the Primary Plant Ventilation System ventilation from the Auxilliary Building. Implementation of this change will not 2ffect the capability of the Primary Plant Ventil-ation to maintain the negative pressure boundary in Unit 1. HVAC equipments in Room 100 for Unit 2 is identical to the existing HVAC equipment in Room 100 for Unit 1. Figure 9,4-2, sheet 4 is modified to reflect this and removal of the blank-off plates.

This change is applicable to Unit 2 and the impact.of this change on unit 1 is being reviewed.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-167 Related SER Section: 9.4.4: SSER22 9.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-3

Description:

(Correction)

Deleted backdraft dampers.at discharge of turbine building supply fans (CP2-VAFNAF-41 & 42).

Justification:

Removal of damper blades from the downstream backdraft dampers will reduces the system iesistance and increase-the system flow for the Turbine Building Basement Area-Ventilation System. The upstream backdraft dampers to the fan adequately prevent backflow during single fan operation. Based on' the as-built configuration for

' Unit 2 ductwork, this modification is required to achieve the acceptable flow, This change does not apply to Unit 1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-754 Related SER Section: 9.4:- SSER22 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact:-No Figure 9.4 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Revision)

Replaces-1 of the Unit 2 Diesel Generator room heaters with a higher capacity air curtain heater.

Justification:

This change was made to resolve low temperature problems encountered during winter.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-584 Related SER Section: 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No l

i.

l L

Attachment to TXX-92391 September 4. 1992 Page 67 of 117 FSAR Page (n amended) Eng.rlption Figure 9.4-4 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Correction)

. Add a note to the figure 9.4-4. sh. I to indicate that the gravity damper is provided for Unit 1 only.

Justification:

Deleted the gravity damper in the main duct as it is redundant to the fan dicharge dampers and is not provided for Unit 2 system.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-689 Related SER Section: 9.4.4: SSER22 9.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-4 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Correction)

Reclassifiy the Safeguard Building Pump Room Exhaust Da mpers from Safety class 3. Seismic Class I to non -

safety Seismic Category none ( Seismic Category II mounting).

Justification:

The dampers are located in the NNS seismic Category II duct. The dampers do not perform any safety function nor are they required for safe operation of the plant.

The reclassification of these dampers to NNS does not affect the safe operation of the Safeguard Building HVAC System. This change is applicable to Unit 2 and the impact of this change on Unit 1 is being under review.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-91 Related SER Section: 9.4.5: SSER22 9.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-4 See Sheet No(s):03

Description:

(Addition)

A temperature monitor and annuniciator is installed in the forced ventillation system for the rod control cabinets.

Justification:

A temperature monitor and astrociated annunciator is installed in the forced air ventilation system for the Rod Control Cabinets, to preclude equipment damage to the rod control circuitry. In case of loss of forced ventilation, operator action is required. This change is implemented on Unit 2 and is being reviewed for Unit 1.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-133 Related SER Section: 9.4.4: SSER22 9.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

l AttachGent to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 68 of 117 FSAR Page

.(g1 amended) Description Figure 9.4-8 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

.(Addition)

Add two isolation dampers in the electrical and control building room 113 for the non-safety portion of the Uncontrolled Access Area Ventilation System.

Justification:

Installation of two high energy line break (HELB) isolation dampers in Electrical and Control Building Room 113-is required to prevent propagation of room 113 HELB environment to Unit 2 safety related battery rooms 2-1 through 2-3.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-178 Related SER Section: 9.4.4: SSER22 9.4.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-11 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Addition)

Addition of HVAC system to the new chemistry instrument laboratory.

Justifiuation:

New lab requires HVAC services to meet the design conditions.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-608.1 Related SER Section: 9.4: SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.4-14 St 'heet No(s):03 cr.s c ri pti on : (Addition)

Addition of HVAC system to the cold laboratory and abondened the existing laundry room makeup air unit.

Add fume hood supply and exhaust.

Justification:

New lab requires HVAC services to meet the design conditions.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-608.6 Related SER Section: 9.4: SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.4E-1 See Page No(s):04

Description:

(Addition)

Addition of chilled water to new chemistry instrument laboratory equipments.

Justificction:

New lab requires chilled water to meet the design conditions.

Group: 3 FSAR_ Change Request Number: 92-608.4 Related SER Section: 9.4: SSER22 9.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach 2ent to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992 Page 69-of.117 FSAR Page

.(Al amended) Description 9.5 65

Description:

(Update)

This change establishes the basis for internal conduit fire seals in Unit 2 whereby automatic or manually actuated suppression (in addition to detection)-is provided on both sides of the barrier. Additionally, this change adds reference to the FPR for evaluations.

Justification:

manually actuated fire suppression systems are installed in both Unit I and Unit 2 electrical switchgear rooms. These are the only plant areas where the primary fixed fire suppression systems required for separation of redundant safe shutdown cables and components are manually actuated In Unit 2 switchgear rooms, the suppression systems are designed and installed to provide area-wide coverage. Therefore in conjunction with the fire detection system coverage,-

the manually actuated suppression systems installed in the Unit 2 provide an acceptable level.of protection.

Based on the level of protection afforded by the Unit 2 design, conduits penetrating fire barriers associated with the Unit 2 switchgear rooms can be sealed on one side of the barrier with no adverse affect on fire safe shutdown capability.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-112 Related SSER Section: SSER21 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-152

Description:

(Correction)

Revise the operation of the Diesel Generator Engine Starting System to delete the drip-trap on the air receiver, Justification:

The drip-traps are not used to automatically blow down the receivers as the feed valves to them are class break valves and are required to be normally closed.

The valves are manually opened to remove any liquid which may have accumulated. This change is being reviewed for Unit I and Unit 2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-721.2 Related SER Section: 9.5.6: SSER22 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 9.5-162

Description:

(Update)

Update the section to indicate that the diesel angine lube oil sump tank and crankcase vents are seismically l" analyzed and missile protected to maintain functional l and structural integrity.

[ Justification:

The vent lines were originally designed non-ASHE III.

i Attachment to TXX-92391 l Septcnber 4, 1992- l

-Page 70 of 117 l I

FSAR Page (Al Amended) Description class 5. non-sesimic with no tornado / missile protection

. These vent lines perform safety related function and blockage of the vent lines will impact the safe operation of the plant. The vent lines are missile protected and are seismically analyzed to assure the structural and functional integrity durino a seismic event.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-065 Related SER Section: 9.5.8; SSER22 9.5.8 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-47 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Addition)

Revises FSAR figure to reflect addition of " water curtain" spray coverage.

Justification:

Installation of " water curtain" type spray coverage provides adequate level of fire separation and satisf-ies the 10CFR50 Appendix R separation criteria.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-688.0 Related SER Section: 9.5.1: SSER21 9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-47 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Addition)

Revises FSAR figure to reflect addition of " water curtain" spray coverage.

Justification:

Installation of " water curtain" type spray coverage provides adequate level of fire separation'and satisf-ies the 10CFR50 Appendix R separation criteria.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-747.0 Related SER Section: 9.5.1: SSER21-9.5.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-52 See Sheet No(s):01,02

Description:

(Correction)

Delete Relief valve in return line of diesel generator fuel oil line.

Justification:

The fuel oil line relief valve was provided by Diesel Generator manufacturer to regulate and maintain minimum back pressure in the fuel line headers by not knowing the as-built piping configuration. The fuel oil piping friction losset and the head pressure of the Fuel Oil System maintair.s the required back pressure in the Fuel Oil System. Hence, deletion of this relief valve will not impact the regulation of the back pressure in the Fuel Oil System. This change applies to Unit 2

rr.

Attach;ent to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992

'Page 71 of 117.

FSAR Page (31 amended) Discription Diesel Generators, and the impact of this change on Unit 1 is being evaluated.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-670 Related SER Section: 9.5.4; SSER22 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-52 See Sheet No(s):1 and 2

Description:

(Revision)

Addition of bypass line on Unit 2 (only).

Justification:

This change allows excess flow from Booster pump to go to Day Tank thereby maintaining proper discharge press-ure from pump. As a result the relief valve won't lift excessively and instruments operate in proper range.

This change is being evaluated for implementation on Unit 1 EDG, Group: 3 FSAR_ Change Request Number: 92-702.0 Related SER Section: 9.5.4.2: SSER24-9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-55 See Sheet No(s):01 and 02

Description:

(Revision)

-Revises sheets to be Unit I only due to addition of a Unit 2 figure (sheet 3).

Justification:

See description provided for F9.5-55 sheet 3.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-130 Related SER Section: 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No-Figure 9.5-55 'See Sheet No(s):01,02

Description:

(Correction)

Remove the_ drip-traps from the Diesel Generator Engine Starting System Air Receiver.

Justification:

The drip-traps are not used to automatically blow down the receivers as the feed valves to them are class break valves and are required to be normally closed.

The valves are manually' opened to remove any liquid which may have accumulated. This change is being reviewed for Unit 1 and Unit 2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-721.1 Related SER Section: 9.5.6; SSER22 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach:ent to TXX-92391 Septenb r 4, 1992 Page 72 of 117 FSiR Page (Al pecnded) Description Figure.9.5-55 See Sheet No(s):03 Description (Revision)

Adds'new sheet 3 to show Unit 2 Starting Air piping due to minor differences between the Unit 1 and Unit 2 diesel generators.

Justification:

The differences include:

1. . Adds crossover purge line from each intake air mainifold assembly to the respective starting air header.

2. Relocates the drain on the starting air header.

3. Adds a low point drain to the air start distributors

4. Revises the flow of the purge line on the air dryer skids.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-180 Related SER Section: 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5-56 See Sheet No(s):01.02

Description:

(Correction)

1) Reroute the turbo prelube oil suction from engine header to the inlet of prelube strainer. 2) Delete class breaks. 3) Add isolation valves, and 4) Depict existing drip (check) valves as needle valves, Justification:

1) Rerouting of turbo prelube oil suction and increase in suction line size from 1/2" to 3/4" will provides the increase in system pressure by eliminating pressure drop through the prelube filter. It also overcomes the head pressure due to turbocharger location, pressure loss due to futrue wear-of the components, and will provide adquate; supply of prelube oil to'the turbo-charger. This change is applicable to Unit 2 and the impact of this change on Unit 1 is being reviwed.

2) Deletion of class breaks is consistent with system classification (class-3). This change is applicable to Unit 2 and the impact on Unit 1.is being reviewed.

3) Addition of isolation valves in the instrumentation lines is required to isolate the instruments during maintenance / repair and also reflect the plant as-built.

This change is applicable to Unit 2 and the impact of this change on Unit 1 is being reviewed.

4).The' check valve is not. requires as reverse flow through the metering valve is minimal and will not affect the enigine operation. Installation of the metering valves will provide an adequate supple of rrelube oil to the turbochargers to assure safe diesel engine starts. This change is applicable to Unit 2 and was completed for Unit 1 before Unit 1 fuel load.

l Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-186

l l

Attachment to TXX 92392 Soptember 4, 1992.

Page 73 of 117 l FSAR Page (31 amendgd) Description s

Related SER Section: 9.5.7: SSER22 9.5.7 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 9.5 57 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Revision)

Revises figur u to be Unit 1 only due to addition of a Unit 2 figure (sheet 02).

Jus tifi cati on':

See description provided for F9.5-57 sheet 2.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-180 Related SER Section: 9.5.8 SER/SSER Impact: No

' Figure 9.5-57 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Revision)

Adds new sheet 2 ' show Unit 2 Air Intake and Exhaust due to minor differences between the Unit 1 and Unit 2 diesel generators.

-Justification:

The differences include:

J. Adds crossover purge line from each intake air mainifold assembly to the respective starting air header.

2. Revises the air intake manifolds and the locations of the drains to the low points on the manifold assemblies.

3. Adds tag numbers for instruments.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-180 Related SER Section: 9.5.6 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.-3-24

Description:

(Clarification)

Revise the section to clarify the existing Feed Water Isolation Valves (FWIVs) requiremer?s and replacement criteria for the FWIVs.

Justification:

Clarify the present section which applies to the ,

originally purchased FWIVs and are not impact tested as per the ASME-code. Also added the criteria for new FWIV or repacement of the pressure boundary components procured for the originally installed valves which should be impact tested as per the original committment Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-686 Related SER Section: 10.3.3: SSER24 10.3.3 l SER/SSER Impact: No

Atthchment to TX 92392

'SQptember 4, 1992

Page 74_of'117 FSAR Page

( Al .4_stD11gd) Descri ptl_p_q Figure 10.3-1 See Sheet No(s):02 Descriptions (Revision)

Adds note to figure indicating that the level switch and level valve to the TDAFP steam supply drain pot are electrically disconnected and abandoned in place.

Justification:

The function of the drain pot was to prevent steam condensate from entering the TDAFP turbine. As a result of unreliability of the drain pot level indicatina and level valve operation, the TDAFP turbine was tested from a coldstart with the drain pot isolated. The test demonstrated that the TDAFP could operate satisf actorily without the drain pot.

E Group: 2 L -FSAR Change Request Number: 92-678 Related SER Section: 10.4.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.3-1 See Sheet No(s):03, 03A and 05

Description:

(Update)

Adds reference to Unit 2 valve tags which correspond to the existing Unit i valve tag numbers.

Justification:

Updates FSAR figures to address both Unit I and Unit 2 valve tag numbers where previously only Unit 1 valve tags were included.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-661 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No

'10.4-32, 33

Description:

(Revision)

Adds five non-safety ventilation chiller conoensers to the-systems _ cooled by the Circulating Water System.

Justification:

These non-safety chiller condensers were inadvertantly ommitted from the cooling requirements of the Circulating Water System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-515 Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: Yes The SER lists the cooling loads for the Circulating Water System. This change adds another load.

10.4-41. 47 See Page No(s):133 & 134

Description:

(Addition)

Added instrumentation to monitor sodium ion concentration at the effluent of the Condensat.

Cleanup System pol' sher vessels and at the condenser i hotwells.

!L Justification:

Attachment to TXX-91391 I September 4. 1992 Page 75 of 117 FSAR Page (11 _GM Qdd ) Descriolipjl The addition of the sodium analyzers allows more reliable momitoring of condensate chemistry.

Group: 3 FSAP Change Request Number: 92-640 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 10.4 s3

Description:

(Correction)

GDC 54 and its corresponding reference has been added for the Auxiliary Feedwater System.

Justification:

GDC 54 is applicable to the design /functicnal requirements of the auxiliary feedwater system instru-mentation. This change is made in accordance with TV Electric letter logged TXX-92249 dated May 21, 1992.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211 Related SER Section: 7.1.2: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-98, 99

Description:

(Revision)

Deletes the autoclosure of extraction steam isolation valves on drain pnt level high-high for Unit 1. This change is also intended for Unit 2, however, implementation is not expected untill after Unit 2 licensing.

Justification:

ASME Code for the prevention of water induction into steam turbines does not require isolation of the turbine on drain pot high levels. Removal of the autoclosure feature reduces the potential for secondary side transients.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-630 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 10.4-119, 120

Description:

(Revision)

Adds description of the Unit 2 Turbine Oil Purification skid and filtration unit and its operation. The Unit 2 system has one less centrifuge skid than Unit 1.

Justification:

For Unit 2. the oil conditioner is primarily used with the centrifuge unit as a backup. For Unit 1 the centrifuge units are primarily used with the oil conditioner as backup.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-663

!ER/SSER Impcct: No

= 0h IAttSchment to TXX-92391.

Sep3QQber.4, 1992' Page-76.of 117 o

FSAR Page

.(11 Amended) pescription 10.4-138

Description:

(Editorial)

Reference 28 has been added.

Justification:

This' editorial change is consistent with the correction made on page 10.4-83.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211 Related SER Section: 7.1.2: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/"SER Impact: No Table 10.4-20 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Addition)

Adds number of locations that hotwell samples are taken from.

Justification:

See description provided for Page 10.4-41.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-640 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 10.4-20 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 03

Description:

(Addition)

Deletes the range for secondary sample instrumentation.

Justification:

This information is contained in the CPSES Design Basis Documents (DBDs) and is too detailed for the FSAR, necessitating frequent update whenever instrumentation is upgraded or replaced with different models.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-640 Related SER Section:-10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-3 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Revision)

Adds a loop-seal drain line between the steam side of the Unit 2 condensers and the condenser exhaust vacuum pumps.

Justification:

Unit 2 condenser exhaust piping is physically different from Unit 1 and this line in-Unit 2 can fill with

' water creating a loop seal and additional head for the condenser exhaust vacuum pumps. The~ drain line allows the loop seal to be continously drained during Unit 2 operation.

Group: 3 o FSAR Change Request Number: 92 0 l Related SER Section 10.4.2 SER/SSER Impact: No l_

! Attach:2ntLto'TXX-92391

September 4, 1992 Page-77-of 117

<FSAR Page (11 AstILdad) ECJLcfjption

. Figure 10.4-4 See Sheet No(s):01

Description:

(Update)

Adds re $rence to Unit 2 valve tags which correspond l to the existing Unit 1 valve tag numbers.

Justification:

Updates FSAR figures to address both Unit 1 and Unit 2 valve tag numbers where previously only Unit 1 valve tags were included. l Group: 4 l FSAR Charge Request Number: 92-661 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-5 See Sheet No(s):04

Description:

(Revision)

Adds five non-safety ventilation chiller condensers to the systems cooled by the Circulating Water System.

Justification:

These non-safety chiller condensers were inadve,'tantly ommitted from the cooling requirements of the Circulating Water System.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-515 Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-6

Description:

(Addition)

Revise the figure to show the Surface Water Hypochlor-ite pumps relief piping to the Circulating Water Chlorination System.

Justification:

The Surface water hypochlorite System is part-of the Circulation Water Chlorination System, connections to and from is required for the completion of the system interface.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-692.2 Related SER Section: 10.4.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4 See Sheet No(s):03 Description; (Addition)

Adds sodium analyzer instrumentation and sampling lines.

Justification:

See description provided for page 10.4-41.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number 92-640 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No

m. '

, .-n e i ..

'LAttachu nt to TXX-92391- *

-SeptemberJ4. 19925

.Page,78 of 117- -

FSAR:Page

(Al magnded) AgJerlotion Fi gu re -- 10'.4 -8 ! See ShM t No(s):01- t 1 Descr ;. tion: .(Addition)

,3

2 Adds sodium analyzer instrumentation and sampling '

lines.

h[

Qc Justification:

Y -See= description provided for page 10.4-41.

Group:'3 m, FSAR Change Request Number: 92-640 1

Related SER Section: 10.4.6 >

--SER/SSER Impact: No Figure =10.4-11 See Sheet No(s):01 '

Description:

(Revision) _

Adds note'.to figure indicating that for Unit-2. the -

internals of the AFW pump recirculation line check-valves have been removed. This change is also scheduled for Unit 1 but has not yet been implemented.

Justification:

The function of'the check' valves was to prevent normal AFW flow.from:short circuiting via the recirc-line.-

Analysis: of. the- pipi.ng configuration with installed:

orifice indicates that flow is limited sufficiently. t without the check valve. To eliminate unnecessary maintenance and testing of these valves.the. internals wereJremoved.

Group: 2'

-FSAR Change Request Number: 92-719

' Related SER.Section: .10.4.9 SER/SSIR Impact:;No-IFigure'10.4-12' :

Description:

. (Revision) ._ _ _ _

l Adds = note to figure. indicating =that for Unit:2. the:

internals _ of the1 AFW pump recirculation line check

. valves have'been removed. This change-is.also scheduled for-Unit'1"but has not yet:been implemented.

Justification:

See description provided for Figure 10.4-11-(Sheet 1).

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request-Number: 92-719 Related SER Section: 10.4.9.

SER/SSER; Impact: JNo >

C' cFigurezl0.4-14 See Sheet No(s):04'and 05 b

_ Ce:,cri pti on : (Update)

-Addstreference to Unit'2 valve tags which correspond to the existing _ Unit 1 valve tag numbers.

Justification:

Updates FSAR figures to address both Unit 1 and Unit 2 valve tag numbers where previously only Unit I valve i, tags were included.

' Group: -4 h .FSAR Change Request Number: 92-661

Attachnent to TXX-92391 September 4. 1992 Page 79 of 117 FSAR Page i(A1 3minjiq_d) RC5CriDJ.iRD Related SER Section: 10.4 I SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-16 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Update)

Updates figure to delete note 7.

Justification:

Note 7 indicated a blind flange was to be installed in the crosstie between Unit 1 and 2 during-construction of Unit 2. U2 construction is complete.

The figure is being restored to a normal 2 unit configuration.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-174 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-17 See Sheet No(s):02

Description:

(Revision)

Adds note to figure indicating that Turbine Lube Oil centrifuge skid 2 is applicable to Unit 1 only.

Justification:

See description provided for Page 10.4-119.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-663 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 10.4-20 See Sheet No(s):01 thru 04

Description:

_ (Addition)

Adds sodium analyzer instrumentation and sampling lines.

Justification:

See description.provided for page 10.4-41.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-640 Related SER Section: 10.4.6 SER/SSER Impact: No See Sheet No(s):1 Figure 11.2-3

Description:

(Addition)

Revise figure to reflect plant design modification that installed sample sinks and associated flush and drain lines.

Justification:

Plant enhancement to improv? the ability to provide adequate sampling and minimize the potential for spills and contamination due to sampling.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-131.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

}l PAttachment'to-TXX 92391-L Septemberl4'. 19924 1Page'801of_117:

1 FSAR'Page-l(31 Agg.nJgd) . Description

-- Fi gure T 11. 2-4 See-Sheet No(s):1-

Description:

(Addition)-

LRevise. figure to reflect plant design modification that-ir. stalled samole sinks and associated flush and drain lines.

Justification:

Plant enhancement to improve the ability to provide

^y adequate sampling and mintmize the potential for spills ,

and contamination due to sampling.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-131.7

. SER/SSER Impact: No-Figure 11.2-5~

Description:

'(Addition)

Revise figure to reflect plant ' design modification that

-installed sample sinks and associated flush and drain lines.

Justification:

Plant enhancement to improve the ability to provide adequate sampling and minimize the potential for spills-and contamination due to sampling.

-Group: 3

.FSAR Change Request Number: 91-131.8 SER/SSER Impact:LNo.

.n

/ Figure '11.2

Description:

(Addition) .

Revise figure to reflect plant design modification that insta11ed' sample sinks and associated flush and-drain

-lines. *

Justification:

Plant enhancement to, improve the ability to provide

. ~a dequate: sampling and minimize the potential for spills

~and contamination.due to sampling.

Group:~3 FSAR Ch;nge Request Number: 91-131.9 SER/SSER' Impact:-No

11 4-1

Description:

(Revision)

Delete the reference to radioactive waste balers in each-Containment Building: add the sentence " An

~

additional waste baler was abandoned.in place in the l Unit 1 Containment-Building."

Justification:

h Description revised to more accurately reflect the

-plant waste baling- subsystem-after:the Unit 2 baler was removed.from-the Unit 2 Containment' Building.

Group: 3.

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-708.1 SER/SSER Impact: No e

~./

lI * -.

, _ . _ __ . . ~ , <

- - -. . . --- ~ . . . - - . ~ . . .

p ,

~

TAttachCent to.LTXX-92391"

_'Septeober'4,.1992 Page:811of 117 :

.FSAR Page-

(n antDAgd): DescriDtiOn 11'. 4 L 1,101 '

Description:

(Revision) -

Delete the reference ~to multiple waste balers in the-discussion of design objectives and_ safety evaluation -

of the plant Radioactive Waste Solidification: System-(RWSS).

Justification:

Description revised to more accurately-reflect the waste baling subsystem after the Unit 2 baler was-removed from the Unit 2 Containment Building.

-Group: 3

' FSAR Change Request Number: 92-708.2 SER/SSER Impact: No f

Description:

(Revision)

~

. 11.4-4,5 Delete the description of Containment balers and the related exhaust air filtratir a systen: and location /

elevation.

'Just'fication.

Description-revised to more accurately reflect the waste baling subsystem'after the Unit 2 baler was removed from the Unit 2-Containment _ Building. Also.-

_ __ The Unit 1 baler had earlier been abandoned in place.

Group:.3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-708.3 SER/SSERilmpact: No

~

Figure 11.4 2

Description:

' (Revi si on_)

Reviselfigure depicting the general flow process for-

-compressing / baling--solid radioactive wastes.

. Justification:

_. Figure _ revised to more accurately reflect the.

waste baling- subsystem _after the Unit ~2-baler was removed -f rom the Unit- 2 Containment Building.

Group: 3 FSAR Change elequest Number: 92-708.4

'SER/SSER~ Impact: No e 111;5-1.

Description:

(Clarification) s A sentence has been edded to indicate that the PRHS:

performs _a post-accident function to satisfy GDC 13 and 54'as described in-Section-6.2.4:and 7.5.

p Astification:

p This clarification is consistent with Section-6.2.4 and

[v ' 7.5 changes, p Group: -3

p. FSAR Change' Request Number: 90-211 u,

Related SER Section: 7.1.2: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No L

I

.-Qg-- y + = . -

e--e

. y r.-gm- p ,

Attach 2ent to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 82 of 117

.FSAR Page (A1 amended) Description 12.2

Description:

(Clarification)

Change the words "the plant" to "each reactor unit" in the discussion of the final design to ensure that expected airborne isotopic concentrations in the normally accessible areas remain below maximum

-permissible concentrations.

Justification:

Change clarifies the description to reflect that the design of each operable unit has been considered in the evaluation of expected airborne concentrations, Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-660,1 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.2-25 See Sheet No(s):1 (Item #4) l

Description:

(Clarification)

Change the words " Containment Building" to " Containment Buildings".

Justification:

Change clarifies that the assumption applies to both unit containment buildings.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-660.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.2-25 See Sheet No(s):1 (Item #5)

Description:

(Revision)

Revise paragraph. description to reflect that release is considered from each reactor unit: delete reference to quantity of tritium released via liquid pathway and replace with the estimated quantity released via the gaseous pathway.

Justification:

Change clarifies that release is considered from each reactor unit and provides the total estimated Curies of tritium released via the gaseour pathway.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-660.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 12.2-25 See Sheet No(s):2,3,4.6,7,8

Description:

(Clarification)

Add the words "for each unit","each unit" or "per unit" as appropiate, to the listed assumptions and parameters.

Justification:

Change clarifies that the appt assumptions and parameters apply to each unit , respect to evaluations in determining expected airborne activity concenstrations.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-660.4

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 83 of 117 r$AR Page

( Al A!!!tDAid) Descriotion SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 12.2 26 See Sheet No(s):1,2,3

Description:

(Revision)

Revise listed radioactive airborne concentration values for the Auxiliary and fuel Buildings; add the word "Each" in the headings for the Safeguards and Reactor Buildings and for the Turbine Mezzanine and Turbine Basement.

Justification:

Airborne concentration values for the common Auxiliary and Fuel Buildings are revised to reflect operation of Unit 2; the word "Each" is added to clarify that these headings reflect values expected in the associated buildings or areas of each unit.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 660.5 SER/SSER impact: No Table 12.2-26 See Sheet No(s):4.5.6,7,8.9 Descriptions (Addition)

Add expected radioactive airborne concentration values for plant buildings / areas wher one unit is in normal operation and one unit is in shutdown or refueling.

Justification:

Values added to reflect the expac+ed radioactive airborne concentrations during the on'-ation mode when one unit is operational and enc unit at shutdown or in refueling.

Groups 3 t FSAR Change Request Number: 92 660 f SER/SSER Impact: No 12.3 29, 30 See Page No(s):33

Description:

(Update)

Update the reference to figures to 1. eie the new figures added thru 12.3 23.8.

Justification:

l Update description to provide radiatian zone

, designations for Unit 2.

Group: 3 FSA' Change Request Number: 91-202.2 SER/ST.ER Impact: No 12.3-47

Description:

(Cl a ri fi. c ati on )

l_

A sentence has been added to indicate that the PRHS performs a post-accident function to satisfy GDC 13 a.1d 54 as described in Section 6.2.4 and 7.5.

Justification:

This clarification is consistent with Section 6.2.4 and 7.5 changes.

Group: 3

1 Attach ent to TXX 92391 Septenber 4, 1992 Page 84 of 117 FSAR Page (11 AmEldid) Rcscriptiof)

FSAR Change Request Number: 90 211 l Related SER Section: 7.1.2: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 12.3 51

Description:

(Clarification)

Item 7 for the primary functions of the Area Radiation Honitor System (ARHS) has been clarified to state that it monitors the radiation level rather than the building and adds reference to section 7.5 of the FSAR.

Items 8 and 9 have been added.

Justification:

This clarification is consistent with FSAR section 7.5.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 00 211 Related SER Section: 7.1.2: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER L act: No 12.3 62

Description:

(Clarification)

Items 5 and 6 have been added.

Justification:

This clarification is consistent with FSAR section 7.5. '

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 90 211 Related SER Section: 7.1.2: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 12.3 23.1

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit 2 areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-202.3 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 12.3-23.2

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit 2 areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 202.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 12.3 23.3

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit 2 areas.

Group: 3 i

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-202.5 SER/SSER Impact: No l

l Attach:2nt to TXX 92391 )

Septenber 4. 1992 Page 85 of 117 FSAR Page (R1.itfRdfd) I!!Lscription Figure 12.3-23.4

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit 2 areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-202.6 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 12.3-23.5

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit ? areas.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-202.7 SER/SSER 1mpact: No

-Figure 12.3-23.6

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit 2 areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Raquest Number: 91 202.8 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Figure 12.3-23.7

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds. designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit 2 areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-202.9 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 12.3 23.8

Description:

(Addition)

Add figure.

Justification:

Adds designation of radiaton zones and shield thicknesses for primary plant Unit 2 areas.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-202.10 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 14.2-34

Description:

(Revision)

Revises description of low power testing for Unit 2 to allow the low power flux distribution to be done anytime prior to exceeding 30% reactor power.

Justification:

See Description for page IA(B)-43 (Item 20) concerning

i Attachoent to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 ]

Page 86 of 117 FSAR Page ]

(Al Attuded) Description 1

)

flux distribution measurements. I Group: 2 !

FSAR Change Request Number: 92 622.2 Related SER Section: 14.0: SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2 2 See Sheet No(s):03 i

Description:

(Update)

Updates the Station Service Water System Preoperational Test Summary to delete the Unit 2 testing of the Station Service Water pump recirculation line pressure controllers to provide consistency with a previously revised FSAR figure.

Justification:

FSAR Figure 9.2 1, Sheet 1, was updated in Amendment 78 to indicate that the Station Service Water pump recirculation line has been abandoned in-place (after performing the Unit 1 preoperational test). FSAR Table <

14.2-2, Sheet 2, Test Method #2 was inadvertantly not ,

updated at that time to indicate that the verification i of the proper operation of the recirculation line pressure controllers was not required for CPSES Unit 2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 705 '

Related SER Section: 9.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: Yes SER section 9.2.1 indicates that the recirculation loop is provided for testing SSW components.

Table 14.2-2 See Sheet No(s):56a

Description:

(Revision)

Relocates the pressurizer heater effectiveness test from the ISU program (Table 14.2-3 Sheet 2) to the Pre operational Test program (Table 14.2-2 Sheet 56a).

Justification:

Amendment 78 relocated the pressurizer spray effectiveness test from the Preoperational Test program to the ISU program because pressurizer spray requires an in place core to provide sufficient differential pressure for adequate spray performance.

That test as well as the pressurizer heater test were originally both part of item 12 Table 14.2-2 Sheet 56a.

When the relocation of the spray test was performed the pressurizor heater test was inadvertantly moved also.

The heater test is now relocated to correct this error.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.1 Related SER Section: 14.0: SSER23 14.0 l SER/SSER Impact: No p -- + - ,

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 S pte:ber 4, 1992 Page 87 of 117 FSAR Page (Al Mt!!did) DMGIlP11911 Table 14.2 3 See Sheet No(s):02 and 02a Descriptions (Revision)

Revises Reactor Coolant System Flow ISU Test Summary Test Method Item " to add Unit 2 specific criteria that the N 16 Transit Time Flow Meter (TTFH) and secondary '

calorimetric will be used at 75% and 100% power in lieu of 50% and 75% power as specified for Unit 1.

Justification:

The TTFM RCS ineasuring systen is unique to CPSES. CPSES specific analysis based on Westinghouse input has determined that reactor power must be greater than 65%

in order to meet the accuracy requirements for a valid surveillance of RCS flow. Power escalation prior to 50% power was justified by a flow calculation based on RCS elbow tap delta P measurements. Westinghouse has analyzed power escalation to 75% and found the delta-p measurement to be adequa e to support this.

Westinghouse also recommends executing the flow measurements at higher power levels. Therefore, these flow measurements are planned for 75% and 100% to comply with the vendor recommendations.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.1 Related SER Section: 14.0: $5ER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2 3 See Sheet.No(s):20

Description:

(Revision)

Revises definition of All Rods Out (AR0) by deleting the number-of steps specified for banks A, B and C and replacing it with the statement " fully withdrawn".

Justification: -

For Unit I the ARO definition for banks A, B and C was 228 steps withdrawn. Subsequently, to prevent fretting of the control rods, a program was initiated to periodically change the fully withdrawn position of those banks by a few steps. Thus it is no longer appropriate-to specify the exact number of steps for those banks to be fully withdrewn.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.2 Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER23 14.0 l SER/SSER Impact: No l.

Table 14.2-3 -See Sheet No(s):20

Description:

(Revision)

Revises description of low power testing for Duit 2 to allow the low power flux distribution to be done

[.

anytime prior to exceeding 30% reactor power.

Justification:

See Descriotion for page 1A(B)-43 (Item 20) concerning flux distribution measurements.

-4 , . ~, ..m

, _ - . . . . . , r-, ,,-.-_..mm..-, . . . , - -. _

i Attachasnt to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 l

Pege BB of 117 FSAR Page (n meended) D m r1Rt19n Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 622.2 Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 14.2 3 See Shtet No(s):23

Description:

(Revision)

Adds description that no 30% power transient testing will be performed on Unit 2. Also changes plateaus for 10% load swings to 50% and 75% RTP.

Justification:

The basis for executing 10% load swings, in conjuction with the large load reduction test, is to demonstrate that the dynamic response of the plant is in accordance with design. The proposed testing at 50% and 75%, in addition to successful testing on Unit I at 50%, ?5%

and 100%, and the Unit I and 2 large load reduction tests is adequate to meet this intent for the following reasons:

-The 10% load swing from 50% power would adequately represent lower power levels, where only one Main Feed-water Pump will be in service. The 10% losd swing from 75% power would adequately represent higher power levels, where both Main Feedwater Pumps will be in service. Test performances at other power levels, such as 35% and 100%, would not provide any additional use-ful data, in addition, the 50% load reduction from 100%

power envelops any transient response due to a 10%

load reduction at 100% power.

-No setpoint changes were required on Unit I based on the performance of these load swing tests.

-This change reduces the number of planned plant tran-sients at power. The change therefore represents an associated reduction in approaches to trip setpoints, potential plant trips & challenges to plant equipment.

Deletion of the 10% load swing _from 1C0% power elimin-ates an additional concern of overshooting 100% reactor power (ie, the licensed power level) on the upswing.

-Recent industry precedence exists for performing load swing tests st a wide variety of power levels. Examples of similar transient testing at PWR's vary from San Onofre Units 2 & 3 (load swings at 50%) to Diablo Canyon (load swings at 30%, 50%, 75% & only a down load swing at 100%). Numerous intermediate variations exist, which allow a plant specific determination of the testing required to meet the test's intent.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.3 Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER24 14.0

Attach:ent to TXX 92391-Septc;ber 4, 1992 Page 89 of 117 l l

FSAR Page ;

(11 Attadtd) Egscription l 1

- SER/SSER Impact: Yes 10% load swing will not be performed at 30% power as described in the SSER 24.

Table 14.2 3 Ste Sheet No(s):23 '

Description (Revision)

Adds Unit 2 specific information that the 50% load reduction test will not be performed at 75% power, Justification:

The large load reduction (50% load change) at 75% power need not be performed for the following reasons:

The large load reduction test from 75% power is essentially identical to the test performed from 200%

power in terms of expected plant response.

No setpoint changes were required from either large lead r duction test performed on Unit 1.

~This change reduces the number of planned plant transients at power. The change therefore represents an associated reduction in approaches to trip setpoints, potential plant trips and potential challenges to plant equipment.

Industry precedence exists. Vogtle Units 1 and 2 performed this test only at 75% power, while South Texas Unit 2, Bryon Unit 2 and Braidwood Units 1 and 2 performed this test only from 100% power.

Group: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.4 Related SER Section: 14.0: SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact. No Figure 14.2-3, 4 A&B Description (Clarification)

In response to Item 3 from the NRC RAI concerning the Startup Testing Program, F14.2-3 and F14.2 4 have been updated to relocate the testing of the "Incore Nuclear Instrumentation" and Auxiliary Startup Instrumentation" from preoperational to the Initial Startup program.

Justification:

l The testing of "Incore Nuclear Instrumentation" and L

~

" Auxiliary Startup Instrumentation" (also known as temporary core loading instrumentation) were relocated under the Initial Startup program and included.in Table 14.2-3 in a previous FSAR amendment. Figures l 14.2-3 and 14.2-4 were inadvertantly not updated to

! reflect these changes at that time.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622,729 Related SER Section: 14.0: SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachmont to TXX 92391 September 4. 1992 Page 90 of 117 FSAR Page (M AMCRAtd) EntriD11CB Figure 14.2-4A, 4B

Description:

(Clarification)

In response to item 1 from the NRC RAI concerning the Startup Testing Program, Figure 14.2 4 has been updated to indicate at which power the Automatic Reactor Contrel System ISU test will be conducted.

(Ref: HRC RAI dated 6/22/92: TXX-92318 dated 7/10/92)

Justification:

Figure 14.2 4, Initial Startup Schedule, has been updated to be consistent FSAR Sections IA(B) and 14.2.

See Description for 1A(B)-43, Item 20. _

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 622,729 Related SER Section: 14.0 SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Figure 14.2 40

Description:

(Revision)

Revises Unit 2 Initial Startup Test schedule to reflect changes proposed to the Reactor Coolant flow Test (T14.2-3 Sheet 2) and Flux Distribution Measurements (T14.2 3 Sheet 20).

Justification:

See Descriptions providad for the above changes to Table 14.2-3.

Also editorially combines the Flux Distribution Measurements and the Core Performance Evaluation due to the overlap and similarity of the testing performed.

Gr.up: 2 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622.5 Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER23 14.0 _

SER/SSER Impact: No 15.1 29. 31

Description:

(Clarification) ,

Specify That The Radiological Consequences of a Hain Steam Line Rupture are Conservative due to the Assumption of Failed Fuel Justification:

This clarification is being made to convey the conserv-ative assumptions used in the analysis. No change to the analysis has been made.

Group: 3

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-664.01 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 15.1 1 See Sheet No(s):2

Description:

(Correction)

Correction to the Time Sequence of Events for the Excessive Increase in Steam flow Event Justification:

TV Electric performed o QA surveillance at Westinghouse in March 1992 which identified minor discrepancies be-tween the .,ialysis and the FSAR. The time sequence of events table in th eFSAR has been changed to be con-l

AttachDont to TXX 92391 Soptember 4, 1992 Page 91 of 117 FSAR Page (11 AmtHdid) PMIFJPl19E sistnet with the analysis results.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Numbert 92-725.11 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.1-3 See Sheet No(s):1, 2 and 3

Description:

(Clarification)

Specify That The Radiological Consequences of a Main Steam Line Rupture are Conservative due to the Assumption of Failed Fuel and That The Entire Secondary Side Liquid Inventory In The Affected Steam Generator is Released in the First Thirty Minutes Justification:

This clarification is being made to convey the conserv-ative assumptions used in the analysis. No change to the analysis has been made.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-664.02 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.2-1 See Sheet No(s):1

Description:

(Correction)

Correction to the Turbine Trip Time Sequence of Events Justification:

TV Electric performed a OA surveillance at Westinghouse in March 1992 which identified minor discrepancies be-tween the analysis and the FSAR. The time sequence of events table in the FSAR has been changed to be con-sistent with the analysis results.

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-725.11 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.4-12

Description:

(Clarification)

Clarify the Moderator Temperature Coef ficient (HTC)

Used in the Rod Withdrawal at Power Event Justification:

The wording has been changed from "The most positive

[HTC)..." to "A least negative or positive [HTC) ...

because the most positive HTC was not always the worst case. A zero or slightly positive HTC was more limit-ing for some of the cases presented in the FSAR.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-725.10 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.4-37. 38

Description:

(Correction)

Correct Unit 2 Time Sequence for the Boron Dilution Event During Startup and Full Power Operation Justification:

The correct time values were submitted to the NRC in a letter dated March 17, 1992. When FSAR amendment 85

Attach 22nt to TXX 92391

.Septe:ber 4. 1992 Page 92 of 117 FSAR Page (n annied) PJiltistinilon was issued in May 1992, an administrative error allowed I incorrect values or "TBD" to be issued in place of the i correct values. The values placed this amendment are l the same as those submitted in the earlier letter. ;

Group 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 758.01 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 15.4 53

Description:

(Correction)

Correction to tne Control Rod Insertion Time for the Rod Ejection Event Justi:ication:

TU Electric performed a OA s9rveillance at Westinghouse in March 1992 which identified that a rod insertion time of 3.3 second* was used for the Unit 2 Rod Ejec-tion Event analysis. The FSAR was changed to reflect the value used in the analysis.

Group: 3 e FSAR Change r equest Number: 92-725.04 SER/SSER Impact: No 15.4 56

Description:

(Correction)

Correction to the Fuel Enthalpies Calrulated by the Rod Ejection Event Justification:

TV Electric performed a OA surveillance at Westinghousc in March 1992 which identified minor errore in the Rod Ejection Event analysis for Unit 2. The ana11s was corrected and the new results for the fuel enthalpy siculation are presented in the change.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-725.05 SER/SSER Impact: No Table 15.4-1 See Sheet No(s):2 and 3

Description:

(Correction)

Corrections to the Rod Withdrawal at Power (RWAP) Time Sequence of Events

! Justification:

TU Electric performed a 0A surveillance at Westinghouse in March 1992 which identified minor errors in the RWAP 1 analysis. Correction of the errors resulted in minor changes to the time sequence for the event.

Group: 3 FSAR Change' Request Number: 92-725.02 l SER/SSER Impact: No L

Table 15.4-1 See Sheet No(s):6

Description:

(Correction)

Correction to the Time Sequence of Events for the Rod Ejection Event Justification:

. Attach ent to TXX 92391 Septcabsr 4, 1992 Page 93 of 117 FSAR Page (n asW) Description TU Electric performed a 0A surveillance at Westinghouse in March 1992 which identified minor errors in the Rod Ejection Event. Correction of the errors resulted in a minor change to the time sequence for the event.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-725.06 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Table 15.4-3

Description:

(Correction)

Correction to the Fuel Temperature and Enthalpies Calculated for the Rod Ejection Event Justification:

TV Electric performed a OA surveillance at Westinghouse in March 1992 which identified minor errors in the Rod Ejection Event analysis for Unit 2. .The analysis has been corrected and the new fuel temperatures and en-thalpies are presented in this change.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Numbet 92-725.07 SER/SSER 1mpact: No THI 1.C-7

Description:

(Correction)

Change in Organizational Titles and Responsibilities for Industry Operating Experience Review

. Justification:

The organization which reviews Industry Operating Ex-perience has changed names from " Plant Evaluation" to

" Plant Analysis." In addition, the review / distribution process for vendor technical correspondence and speci-fic types of NRC correspondence is being performed by other organizations.. The description has been changed-to include these other organizations.

Groups 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-699.01 Related SSER Section: SSER23 22.2 SER/SSER Impact: No THI 1.C-8

Description:

(Update)

Change in Organizational Responsibilities for Industry Operating Experience Review (10ER)

Justification:

The manager within Operations who screens the 10ER for Operations personnel is now the Shift Operations Mana-ger instead of the Operations Support Manager.

Group: 3 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-699.02 Related SSER Section: SSER23 22.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach ent to TXX 92391 Septenbsr 4. 1992 Page 94 of 117 FSAR Page (A1 Amended) Descr.jplign 0&R 010-55 Dascription: (0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to 0&R 010.26 stating the information contained in the reponse will not be incorporated into the FSAR text (USAR) and includes a reference to the related sections in the FSAR and Fire Protection Report.

Justification:

This is an edito*ial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The fire Safe Shutdown Analysis contains the associated circuit analysis. The Fire Protection Repfrt contains a summary description of the analysis. Any changes to to the calculation which affect the analysis would be reflected in revisions to the Fire Protection Report.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-34 Related SER Section: 9.5 SER/SSER impact: No O&R 010-60

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to O&R 010,29 stating that the information contained in the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text (USAR) and includes references to the related sections in the FSAR and Fire Protection Report where the information can be found.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The design requirements for associated circuits by common enclosure is discussed d 9 Fire Protection Report.

Group: 4 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 92 37 l Related SER Section: 9.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 010-61

Description:

(0&R Incorporation) l Adds a note to 0&R 010.30 stating that the information l contained in the response will not be incorporated into l the FSAR text (USAR) and includes references to the

related sections in the FSAR and Fire Protection Report l where the information is contained.

I Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The FSSA described in the FPR ensured that all plant design changes were evaluated / incorporated into the analysis.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-38 Related SER Section: 9.5 SER/SSER Impact: No

i Attach 2ent to TXX-92391 Scptc bar 4, 1992 Page 95 of 117 r$AR Page !

(Al Antended) Descriptign O&R 010 62

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to 0&R 010.31 stating that the information contained in the response will not be incteporated into the FSAR text (USAR) and includes references to the related sections in the FSAR and Fire Protection Report (FPR) where the information is contained. ,

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section fcr deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The Fire Safe Shutdown Analysis described in the FPR did not take credit for repair procedures to achieve hot standby conditions.

Group: 4 FSAR Cher.ge Request Number: 92 39 Related SEP Section: 9.5 FD iSER 1mpact: No O&R 010 64 Description (0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to Q&R 010.32 stating that the information contained in the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text (USAR) and includes references to the related sections in the FSAR and Fire Protection Report (FPR) where the information is already contained.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for delacion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The Fire Safe Shetdown Analysis report in the FPR describes the operater actions and includes references to specific CPSES procedures where additional detailed operator actions are discussed.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 40 Related SER ??.ction: 9.5 SER/SSER Impact; No O&R 010-65

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to 0&R 010.33 stating that the information l- contained in the response will not be incorporated into the updated FSAR text (USAR) and includes references to the related sections in the FSAR and Fire Protection Report (FPR) where the additional information is found.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The information provided in this response vias a point-in-time description of the results of a breaker / fuse study which was transmitted to the NRC by TXX-4527 and is not appropriate for inclusion into the FSAR text. The Safe l Shutdown Analysis report prov;ced in the FPR contains

. additional information related to the coordination and l selective tripping of breaker / fuses for safe shutdown.

Group: 4 l

L

1 l

l Attechment to TXX-92391 l Septcmber 4 '4992 i Page 96 of 117 FSAR Page (11 Amended) Description FSAR Change Request Number: 92-41 Related SER Section: 9.5 SER/SSER Impact: No

-Q&R 022 36

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates the information contained in the response to 0022.11 to FSAR text and adds a reference to the related FSAR section.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-47.1 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 022 41

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates the response to 0022.16 to the FSAR text and adds a reference to the related FSAR Section 6.2.2.2.1.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the FSAR is updated.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-71.2 Related SER Section: 6.2 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 022 43

Description:

(Editorial)

The response has been updated by referencing the FSAR sections which contain the requested information.

Justification:

This update prepares the FSAR in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e).

Grcup: 4' FSAR Change Request Number: 90-211 Related SEr< Section: 7.1.2: SSER22 7.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032-2

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces Q&R response to NRC question 032.2 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the O&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR' Change Request Number: 92-78.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach 2ent to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 97 of 117 FSAR Page (Al AE ndud) Rescrintion O&R 032-4

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the Q&R response to NRC question 032.4 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the 0&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-79.0 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 032 5

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces Q&R respense to NRC question 032.5 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This charge is made to ready the O&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 80.0 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032-6

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces Q&R response to NRC question 032.6 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the Q&R section for deletion when USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-81.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3,11 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032-13

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the 0&R response to NRC question 032.13 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

l This change is made to ready the 0&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-84.0 SER/SSER Impact: No i

0&R 032 23 Peicriotion: (0&R Incorporation) l Deletes response to 0032.022 and adds reference to the FSAR sections where the information contained in the l response is located, i Justification:

Q&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

. ' Group: 4 L FSAR Change Request Number: 92-90.1

Attachoent to TXX 92391 SQptembQr 4. 1992 Page 98 of.117 FSAR Page (as Amended) I)escription SER/SSER 1mpact: No Q&R 032-26

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0032.025 and adds reference to the FSAR sections where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Chattge Request Number: 92 91.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 032 28

Description:

-(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the response to 0032.27 and adds references to the related FSAR text in Sections 5.4.7. 7.6.2.1, and Appendix SA whqre the information requested is already '

contained.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The information contained in the response is already dis-cussed in FSAR Sections 5.4.7 and Appendix SA.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-92 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032-29 Descriptions (0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the Q&R response to NRC question 032.28 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the 0&R section for deletion'when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-93.1 Related SER Section: 7.6; SSER22 7.6 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 032-35

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces the O&R response.to NRC question 032.31 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the O&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 95.0 Related SER Section: 3.11: SSER22 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No l

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 99 of 117 FSAR Page ;

(B1 ARindgd) DescrlDtion !

O&R 032-37

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes response to 0032.033 and adds reference to the FSAR sections where the information contained in the response is located. ,

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR),

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-96.1 SER/SSER Impact: No l O&R 032-42

Description:

(0&R Incorpo'ation)

Deletes response to 0032.038 and adds reference to the FSAR sections where the information contained in the response is located.

Justification:

O&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-99.1 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 0&R 032-47 Descriptions (Editorial)

Replaces the Q&R response to NRC question 032.42 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text and tables.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the 0&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-103.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 6.2.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 032-60

Description:

-(Editorial)

Replaces the O&R response to NRC question 032.55 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the Q&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-106.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 7.8.2

-SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 032-72

Description:

(Editorial)

References the appropriate FSAR text section as the response to 0032.63.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the 0&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-110.0

Attachaent to TdX-92391 September 4. 1992 tage 100 of 117 FSAR Page (M MRndtID ER.E d Pil0D SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032 75

Description:

(Editorial)

Revises response to NRC question to refer to the FSAR text sections containing the response.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the 0&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 87.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032-79

Description:

(Editorial)

Adds note to the effect that part (a) of the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text.

Justification:

The concerned instrument does not exist per design at CPSES and therefore the response does not impact '

FSAR.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 111.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032 79

Description:

(Editorial)

Revises part (b) of the response to indicate FSAR section containing the response.

Justification:

The response is already in the FSAR text.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-111.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 032-85

Description:

(Editorial)

Revises the response to identify the FSAR text only.

Justification:

The FSAR already contains the response to the NRC question'.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-113.0 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 032-93

Description:

(Editorial)

Revises the response to NRC question 032.82 to identify the FSAR text section containing the response.

Justification:

The response is being relocated to FSAR text section.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-115.1 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attachment to TXX-92391 Septe:ber 4, 1992 Page 101 of 117 FSAR Page (Aa Assadtd) Ecicription O&R 032-101 Descriptinn: (Editoriel)

Adds a note to the response indicating that the response will not be incorporated as part of O&R relocation f or the USAR. '

Justification:

The response indicates that the FSAR as described is correct.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-119.0 )

SER/SSER Impact: No l Q&R 032 102

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to 0&R 032.89 which indicates that the i response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text as part of the updated FSAR (USAR).

Justification:

The information in the response is dated and was-help-ful to the reviewer; however, it is not pertinent to the FSAR text. This editorial change will help prepare the O&R Section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 120,1 Related SER Section: 6.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 032 103

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to 0&R 032.90 which indicates that the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text as part of the updated FSAR (USAR).

Justification:

The information in the response is dated and wt - help-ful to the reviewer; however, it is not pertinent to the FSAR text. This editorial change will help prepare the O&R Section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-120.2 Related SER Section: 10.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 032-107

Description:

(Editorial)

Revises the response to NRC question 0032.94 to identify the FSAR text sections containing the response.

Justification:

The response is contained in the FSAR text sections.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-121.0 SER/SSER Imp "t: No l

Attach:ent to TXX-92391 Septc;ber 4, 1992 Page 102 of 117 TSAR Page (n implidad) Das_criDtion Q&R 032 108

Description:

(Editorial)

Revises the response to NRC question 0032.95 to identify FSAR text section.

Justification:

The FSAR text is revised to contain the response.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-122.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 7.3.1-3 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 032 172, 1/3

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates 0&R response to NRC question 032.110 into FSAR text / tables and adds 0032.110 to the relevant FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the 0&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.1 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R Table 032 110-1 See Sheet No(s):1

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the O&R Table 032.110-1.

Justification:

O&R Table 032.110-1 is replaced by Table 7.5-7A.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.3 Related SER Section: 7.5; SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No LO&R Table 032 110 2 See Sheet No(s):1 through 14

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes O&R Table 032.110-2.

Justification:

0&R Table 032.110-2 is relocated to Table 7.5-7B.

[ Group: 4 l FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.10 Related SER Section: 7.5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R Table 032 110-3

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the O&R Table 032.110-3.

Justification:

0&R Table 032.110-3 is relocated to Table 7.5-7C.

l Group: 4 l

FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.14 Related SER Section: 7.5; SSER22 1.5 SER/SSER Impact: No-

Attach 2ent to TXX 92391 September 4. 1992 Page 103 of 117 FSAR Page (A1 art!1did) Dgtcf_iption O&R Table 032-110 4

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the 0&R Table 032.110 4. !

Justification: 1 0&R Table 032.110 4 is reloccted to Table 7.5 70. l Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91 197.19 Related SER Section: 7.5 S$ER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R Table 032-110-5

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the O&R Table 032.110-5.

Justification:

0&R Table 032.110-5 is relocated to Table 7.5-7E.

Group 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.22 Related SER Section: 7.51 SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R Table 032-110 6

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the O&R Table 032.110-6.

Justification:

0&R Table 032.110-6 is releccted to Table 7.5 7F.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 91-197.25 Related SER Section: 7,5: SSER22 7.5 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 040-15

Description:

(Editorial)

Deletes and relocates information to FSAR Section 6.3 related to motor operated valves in the ECCS that require power lockout in order to meet BTP-ICSB-18.

Adds references to the related FSAR sections where the information is found.

Justification:

This change reflects the update to Section 6.3 which indicates the commitment in TXX 88777 is completed and closed. The commitment was to determine if there were any NSSS or BOP valves, in addition to those currently included in the Technical Specifications, which require power lockout in order to meet BTP-ICSD-18.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-745.4 Related SER Section: 6.3: SSER22-8.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 040-20

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Add note indicating the response to this question is not to be incorporated into the USAR.

Justification:

The Question requests a list of equipment meeting certain criteria. The response answers in the negative in that there is no such equipment and no list. Incor-

Attach:ent to TXX 92391 Septe;ber 4,1992 Page 104 of 117 FSAR Page (Al ARttidtd) EtLECriR11911 poration of the response into the USAR would provide no information. The response will not be incorporated into the USAR Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-140 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 040-65

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces 0&R response to NRC question 040.42 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the O&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-154.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 3.11 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 040-69

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces 0&R response to NRC question 040.046 by referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the O&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared. '

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-155.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER Impact:-No O&R 040 72

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Replaces 0&R response to NRC question 040.049 response L

to the FSAR text.

Justification:

This change is made to ready the O&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

Group: 4 L- FSAR Change Request Number: 92-156.1 L Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER 'mpact: No 0&R 040- ,

Description:

_(Editorial)

Replaces 0&R response to NRC question 040.52 by E referencing the appropriate FSAR text.

Justification:.

This change is made to ready the O&R section for deletion when the USAR is prepared.

I Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-158.1 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 1,

7.

Attach 3ent to TXX-92391 Sept::ber 4 1992 Page 105 of 117 FSAR Page (n .iialpJdid) Description Q&R 040 87

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes editorially correct information from 0&R discussion and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information is already located.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-160 Related SER Section: 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 040 163

Description:

(Editorial)

Adds note to the effect that the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text.

Justification:

The 0&R response is consistent with FSAR text. The response indicated that the suggested modification in 0040.120 is not required at CPSES.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-184.0 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.3.2 SER/SSER Impact: No-0&R Table 040.49-1 See Sheet No(s): sheets 1 and 2

Description:

(Editorial)

Deletes 0&R table 040.49 1 sheets 1 and 2.

Justification:

The O&R table is replaced with FSAR table 8.2-1 sheets 1 and2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-156.4 Related SSER Section: SSER22 8.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 121-1, 2

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the previous response to 0121.1 and references the related FSAR section where the updated information requested by this Q&R can be found.

Justification:

FSAR Section 5.2.4, as described in the previous res- j ponse to 0121.1 was revised in a previous FSAR Amend-ment but was inadvertantly not incorporated into this 0&R. The FSAR text location or the updated informa-tion is now referenced in the revised response to 0121.1 and includes the 0121.1 margin notation in FSAR Section 5.2.4.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-302 Related SER Section: 5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach: nt to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 106 of 117 FSAR Page (g ntaded) Description 0&R-121-3

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes and relocates the response to 0121.2 and adds a reference to the related FSAR Section 5.3.1.6 where the

-information is already contained.

Justificationt This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The information contained in the response to O&R 121.2 is already contained in the FSAR text, Section 5.3.1.6.

ihe specific edition of ASTM E-185 (1973) was provided as a point-in time response to 0121.2. FSAR Section 5.3.1.6 indicates compliance with ASTM E 185, in a general sense, pursuant to 10CFR50, Appendxi H. The vendor's material specification (WCAP) for a specified surveillance capsule indicates the appropriate edition of ASTM E-185 and will be in compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix H.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-303.1 Related SER Section: 5.3: SSER1 5.3 SER/5SER Impact: No O&R 121-4

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Changes the second reference in the response to 0121.3 from FSAR Section "5.3.2.7" to "S.3.2.1". Adds a note stating that the information contained in the response will not be incorporated into the updated FSAR (USAR) and includes references to the related FSAR sections.

Justification:

This .is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR (USAR) is prepared.

This change corrects a typographical error in the referenced sections where the information contained in the response'is already located. -The balance of the information in the response merely referenced a Generic Letter which required a later revision of the subject Regulatory Guide to used. The referenced FSAR sections contain the information requested in the current FSAR amendment.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-304.2 Related SER Section: 5.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R.123-1

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds a note to O&R 123.1 which states that the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text (USAR).

Justificction:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The information contained in the response only provides the '

basis for not providing the information asked by the

1 Attach snt to TXX 92391 l Septc:bar 4, 1992 -

Page 107 of 117 l FSAR Page (n Anttu.ded) DescriottoD question.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 322 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 123 9 Descriptions (0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the response to O&R 123.7 and add references to revised FSAR Section 5.4.1.5.3 and new FSAR Tables 5.4-19 and 5.4-19A.

Justification: 1 This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-326.1 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No O&R 123 11

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete the current response to 0&R 123.9 and relocate the information to FSAR Section 5.2.3.3.1. Replace the response with a reference to the related FSAR section.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-328.1 Related SER Section: 5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R Table 123.7-1, 2

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates the information contained in Q&R Tables 4 123.7-1 and 123.7 2 to new FSAR Tables 5.4 19 and 5.4-19A.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-326.2 Related SER Section: 5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 130 4

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Revises the response to FSAR 0130.A to state. "See revised FSAR Section 3.8,4.1.7": and relocates the information contained in the current response to a new FSAR Paragraph 3.8.4.1.7.

Justification:

-This chanta is made to rea/, the O&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-332.1

Attach:2nt to TXX-92391 Scptc bar 4. 1992 Page 108 of 117 FSAR Page (11 Attadid) Description Related SER Section: 3.5 I SER/SSER Impact: No j l

O&R 13013

Description:

(0&a Incorporation) '

Relocate the information contained in the response to Q&R '10.13 to FSAR Section 3.78.3.12.1 and add a refer qce to the related FSAR sections.

Justific tion:

Thi. s an editorial change to ready the O&R Section i fu. a-letion when the update FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 337.1 Related SER Section: 3.7 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 130 20

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete the current aesponse to O&R 130.20 and add a reference to the related FSAR Section 3.3.2.2.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the O&R Section for Jeletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The information is already contained in FSAR Section 3.3.2.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 341 i Related SER Section: 3.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 130-21 Description (0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the information in the response to 0130.21 and revises the current response to 0130.21 to ieference FSAR Section 3.5.3.2 where the information is found.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR (USAR) is prepared.

The information requested by 0130.21 had previously been added to FSAR Section 3.S.3.2 in a prior FSAR amendment.-

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 342 Related SER Section: 3.5 SER/SSER Impact: No

Q&R 212 't IS

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

L Delete the response to 0212.8 and change the response to reference revised FSAR Section 3.S.1.

Justification:

Thit is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section

! for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

I Group: 4 i

FSAR Change Request Number: 92-368.1 SER/SSER Impact: No

Attach 2ent to TXX 92391 Scptsrbor 4, 1992 Page 109 of 117 FSAR Page (As Amended) Description O&R 212-18

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete the response to 0212.11 and change the response to reference revised FSAR Section 3.5.1.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 371.1 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 212 93, 94

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the information contained in the response to 0&R 212.50 and adds references to the FSAR sections where the information is already contained. The last three sentences in the response are not relocated to the FSAR text.

Justification:

This is an e itorial change to ready the O&R Section for deletion whs ' .'he updated FSAR is prepared. The information not included in the relocation f the text only responde6 to an example and provided

3rmation to aid the NRC reviewer in his or her asi .a t .

Group: 4 FSAR Change Reque. Number: 92-138.2 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 212 93, 94

Description:

(Editerial)

Deletes and relocates information to FSAR Section 6.3 related to motor operated valves in t' e ECCS that require power lockcut in order to meet BTP-ICSB 18.

Adds references to *Se related FSAR sections where the information is founo, ,

Justification:

This change reflects the update to Section 6.3 which indicates the commitment in TXX-88777 is completed and closed. The commitment was to determine if there were any NSSS or BOP valves, in addition to those currently included in the Technical Specifications, which require power lockout in order to meet BTP-ICSB-18.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 745.S Related SER Section: 6.3: SSER22 8.4 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 212 95, 96 Descriptions (Editorial)

Deletes and relocates information to FSAR Section 6.3 related to motor operated valves in the ECCS that require power lockout in order to meet BTP-ICSB-18.-

Adds references to the related FSAR sections where the information is found.

Justification:

{

Attachment to TXX 92391 September 4, 1992 Page 110 of 117 FSAR Page (11 Attaded) DCLEription This change reflects the update to Section 6.3 which indicates the commitment in TXX-88777 is completed and closed. The commitment was to determine if there were any NSSS or BOP valves, in addition to those currently included in the Technical Specifications, which require power lockout in order to meet BTP-!CSB-18.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 745.6 Related SER Section: 6.3: SSFR22 8.4 SER/SSER 1mpact: No Q&R 212-95, 96

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the information contained in the response to 0&R 212.El and adds references to the FSAR sections where the information is already contained.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-138.3 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 212-99, 100

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the information contained in the response to O&R 212.53 and adds a reference to the FSAR section where the information is already contained or relocated.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Grovo: 4 FSAP. Change Request Number: 92-138.4 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 212-102. 103

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates the information contained in the response to O&R 212.55 to the FSAR text. Adds references to the related FSAR section where the information is contained.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 138.5 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No

- .. - . . . - - - -. -. -. .- . . - - .~ -. -

Attachasnt,to TXX-92391:

September 4._'1992_~

"h.: , _ ;Page(111 ofi117-9 r 9p

^

FSAR Page

?(At Aggnded) iDescription g

=0&R'212 145- :

Description:

- (0&R Incorporation)

Delete the response to 0212.81 and change N response to reference FSAR Section 5~4.1. '

Justification: _ _

This is an editorial change to ready the Q&R-Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is-prepared._ There isino change necestsry for F3AR 5.4.1 as theitext responds to the qusestion as. written.

Group: 4

.FSAR Change Request Number: 92-_049.1 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 212 14E-

Description:

.(0&R Incorporation)

Delete. response to 0212.83 and adds reference and revised'the section where-the infermation contained in:

L .

the. response is-located.-

l- Justification:

20&R' relocation is being performed to prepare the.FSAR-ifo_r the Updated ~ Safety' Analysis Report (USAR),

Group:-4

-FSAR Ch'ange Request Number:.92LO51.1'

.Related'SER Section: 9.3.1; SSER22 9.3.1 SER/SSER Impact: -No'

~

Q&R 212-152

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Delete-the-response'to'0212.87 and change.the rest.,nse

_ t o reference. revised FSAR Section 3.5.1.

Justification:-

r This .is: an-editorial change to ready the 0&R Section

, for deletion: when the.- updated FSAR is prepared.

Group:: 4

'N Sange Request: Number: 92-063.'l-4R/" ~R Impact: No-

~

-Q&R P.12-153

Description:

-(0&R Incorporation) . _

Delete the-response to 0212.88 and change the response-to seference revised FSAR Section'3.5.1.

Justifi ca t.i on:

, 'ihis is' an editorial change to ready the Q&R Section

. for delet,on when the updated FSAR is' prepared.

s Group: 4

FSAR Change Request-Number: 92-054.1 p SER/SSER Impact: No:

C*R si2i164- . E,a c cripti on: (0&R-Incorporation)

Revises the present response.to 0212.98 toTreference 7

.~ those sections of FSAR Chapter 5 which contain'.the p requested information.

H Justification:

L _

This respor..e is being revised and incorporated into

) the FSAR text in preparation for the USAR. FSAR L. __

_Section 5.2.5.2.1 specifically describes the CPSES h' .

, ._, .a .-. . - - - - -~ - --.. - - _ - . . .

,,ttachtent:to TXX-92391 Et*pt.sber 4, 1992-Page 112 of 117

-FSAR Page (11 Agggggd) Dqitdpilga design for monitoring leakage paths and for computing both identified and unidentified leakage rates, FSAR Section 5.2.5.5 describes the control room indications and alares associated with the reactor head flange leakoff line and the pressurizer safety and relief valve leakoff lines. These sections of the FSAR are fully responsive to the Question 212.98 and the revision of the present response to reference these FSAR sections is editorial in nature.

Group: 4

'SAR Change Request Number: 92-59

'ER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 212-168

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Revises the present response to 0212.102 to reference those sections of FSAR Chapter 5 which contain the requested information.

Justification:

This response is being revised and incorporated into the FSAR text in preparation for the USAR FSAR Table 5.4-16 1s presently referenced by the response and contains liquid flow rates for the Pressurizer relief and safety valves at a specific pressure. FSAR Section 5.2.2.11, in it's. entirety, describes the CPSES design and design basis for Low Temperature Over-Pressurization Protection (LTOP). This reference, which replaces the generic reference to the WOG report, is directly resporsive to the staff's requested information for CPSES. Since the entire Section 5.2.2.11 is identified as being responsive no cross reference is being added in the text. The revision of the present response to reference this section of the FSAR is editorial in nature.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-62 Related SER Section: 5.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 212-176 Descriptio': (0&R Incorporation)

Deletes the information in the response to 0212.109 which is already contained in the FSAR text and adds references to the related FSAR sections. Adds a note which states that the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs of the response will not be incorporated into the USAR.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion when the updated FSAR is prepared. The information contained in the second and third paragraphs of the 0&R response only provided the basis for excluding the referenced valves from the requestea list of valves, the malposition of which could degrade ECCS performance.

Attach:ent to TXX-92391 September 4, 1992

'Page 113 of 117 i

FSAR Page (M Aetnded) EncripMpa Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-190 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 212-178

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Revises present response to reference those sections of the FSAR which are responsive to Question 212.111.

Justification:

This respo..se is being revised and incorporated into the FSAR text in preparetion for the USAR. That section of the FSAR which states that the Boron Injection Surge Tank is no longer part of the CPETC ESF oes'gn is being referenced in place of the piesent response. This change is editorial in nature.

l Group: 4 i FSAR Change Request Number: 92 192.2 Related SER Section: 6.3 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 311-1

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes editorially correct information from 0&R discussion and adds reference to the FSAR text where the information is already located.

Justification:

This change ;s being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-260 Related SER Section: 2.1.2 SER/SSEP Impact: No Q&R 311-9

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes editorially correct information from Q&R discussion and adds reference to the FSAR text where the information is already located.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR),

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-263 Related SER Section: 2.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No Q&R 311-10

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes editorially correct information from O&R discussion and adds reference to the FSAR section where the information is already located.

Justification:

I This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4

Attachoent to'TXX-92391 SepteQber 4, 1992

-Page 114 of 117 FSAR Page (Al Asgnded) Description FSAR Change Recuest Number: 92-264 Related SER Section: 2.2, 9.5: SSER24 9.5.4 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 312-1, 2

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes editorially correct ir. formation from Q&R discussion and adds reference to the FSAR text where the information is already located.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-265,266 Related SER Section: 2.1.2 SER/SSER 1mpact: No 0&R 312-14

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Relocates the response to 0312.13 to FSAR Section 9.1.

Justification:

0&R relocation is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-270.1 Related SER Section: 9.1.2.2: SSER22 9.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 3 0-3

Description:

(0&R Incorporction)

Removes dated information from Q&R discussion and adds reference to the FSAR section where the correct information is already. located.

Justification:

The information described in the Q&R discussion is dated information and is no longer correct. The testing activites conducted as part of the Initial Test Program as described in Section 14.2, and the startup program comply with the intent of Regulatory Guide 1.68 Revision 2, dated August 1978 as described in Appenoix 1A(B) in lieu of the previously committed 1973 version of the Regulatory Guide. This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR),

-Grou , o FS/ Change Request Number: 92-277 Related SER Section: 14.0: SSER24 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 361-4

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Adds note to 0&R discussion indicating that the response will not be incorporated into the FSAR text as part of the O&R relocation for the USAR.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for

i Attachmont to TXX-92391 SeptembQr 4,=1992 Page 115 of 117 FSAR Page (n Aman _5Ltd) Description the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-419 Related SER Section: 2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 361 22

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes editorially correct information from Q&R discussion. FSAR Section 2.1.2 already includes the correct 0&R reference.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis-rteport (USAR).

Group 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 433 Related SER Section: 2.1.2 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 361-29

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes editorially correct information from 0&R discussion. FSAR F2.5.1-11 has already been updated to include appropriate information.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report (USAR).

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-437 Related SER Section: 2.5 SER/SSER Impact: No 0&R 421-70

Description:

(0&R Incorporatior.)

Adds'a note to Q&R 421.67 stating that the information contained in the response will not be incorporated into the updated FSAR (USAR) text: includes a reference to the re?ated FSAR Section 17.2 for additional informa-tion; and adds the 0421.67 margin notation to the text.

Justification:

This is an editorial change to ready the 0&R Section for deletion whent the updated FSAR (USAR) is prepared.

The information requested by 0421.67 is already con-tained in FSAR Section 17.2 an6 tha current response merely' refers the reader to the related FSAR sections where the information is found.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number 92-525 Related SER Section: 17.2 SER/SSER Impact: No

~

-Attachacnt to TXX-92391 Septembar 4, 1992 Page 116 of 117 FSAR Page (n gagn.ded) Description Q&R 423-1

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes superseded information from R423.01 which was inadvertantly not updated in previous amendments and adds the correct reference for the FSAR text where the correct information is already located.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-530 1 Related SSER Section: SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No O&R 423-2. 3 See Page No(s):04 and 19

Description:

(Clarification)

In response to item 3 from the NRC RAI concerning the Startup Testing Program, R423.2 and R423.10 has been updated to identify that portions of the preoperational test phase will be deferred until after fuel load.

(Ref: NRC RAI dated 6/22/92; TXX-92318 dated 7/10/92)

Justification:

R423.2 was updated to indicate that the Operational Vibration Test will be performed at most major test plateaus during preoperational and initial startup testing with final completion during transient testing for 100% RTP. Additional data collection and evaluatio must be made periodically during power ascension and during the turbine trip test at 100% RTP.

R423.10 was updated to indicate that the Incore Nuclear Instrumentation and the Auxiliary Startup Instrumetation tests have been moved to the initial startup test phase. See Description for Figure 14.2-3, 4A & B.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-622,729 Related SER Section: 14.0; SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No 057 423-10, 11

Description:

(0&R Incorporation)

Removes discussion from R423.07 and adds the correct reference to the FSAR text where the information is already located.

Justification:

This change is being performed to prepare the FSAR for the Updated Safety Analysis Report.

l Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92-532 Related SSER Section: SSER23 14.0 SER/SSER Impact: No li

^ ~

[

JAttachment to TXX-92391

.Septembsr 4, 1992-

-Page 117 of 117 FSAR Page (A1 Amended) Description 0&R 423-41 Description (Editorial)

Updates reference to the Remote Shutdown Test Summary to indicate the correct sheet numbers.

Justification:

Updates R423.16. Item 8. to indicate the correct sheet numbers for the Remote Shutdown Test Summary.

Group: 4 FSAR Change Request Number: 92 622 Related SER Section: 14.0 SER/SSER impact: No L

l

ML20104A315

Text

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description:

Description: