|
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20214C4131986-11-12012 November 1986 Affidavit of DE Gilberts Re Enforcement Action 86-164 & NRC 861022 Order to Show Cause Concerning Use of Radios in Control Rooms ML20212K1821984-09-12012 September 1984 Partially Withheld Affidavit Re Nuclear Energy Svc 830531 Ut/T Insp at Facility.Related Documentation Encl ML20212P1861984-09-12012 September 1984 Partially Withheld Handwritten Affidavit in Monroe,Mi Re 830531 Ultrasonic Testing Insp.Related Documentation Encl ML20212P1581984-09-12012 September 1984 Partially Withheld Handwritten Affidavit Re 830531 Ultrasonic Test Insp ML20209D2461984-08-0101 August 1984 Joint Affidavit of Rl Rothman,Rb Mcmullen,L Reiter & Sj Brocoum Re Evaluation of Seismological & Geological Info Provided by Joint Intervenors Affecting Seismic Design Basis ML20205Q8011984-06-29029 June 1984 Affidavit of RG Tolson Re Records & Retrieval Rept.Related Info Encl ML20205Q7951984-06-29029 June 1984 Affidavit of Lm Richman Re Records & Records Retrieval Rept ML20098D1601983-12-13013 December 1983 Affidavit of E Rosolie Re CP Extension.No Need for Facility Exists & Requested Extension Until June 1991 Unreasonable ML20098D0921983-12-13013 December 1983 Affidavit of N Bell Re Discussion W/J Lazar,Research Director of Northwest Conservation Act Coalition,That Power from WPPSS Not Needed ML20133C6451983-11-16016 November 1983 Affidavit of Hs Nunn Re Quality of Const at Plant ML20133C6411983-11-16016 November 1983 Affidavit of WR Mcafee Re Concerns Over Quality of Const at Plant ML20098D0001983-11-11011 November 1983 Affidavit of MD Brincat Re Correctness of Listed Documents ML20133C6321983-11-0909 November 1983 Affidavit of JB Stearns Re Concerns Over Shoddy Workmanship & Retaliation Against Persons Challenging Poor Workmanship at Plant ML20078N7201983-06-20020 June 1983 Affidavit of Ee Kent Re Quality of Welding in Nuclear Power Plants & Inadequate Handling of Allegations by NRC ML20210E6521983-05-27027 May 1983 Affidavit of AD Johnson Re Joint Intervenors 830510 Motion to Reopen Record on Issue of Const Qa.No Items of Noncompliance Represented Major Breakdown of Const Qa/Qc Programs of Licensee & Contractors ML20028B9051982-11-0808 November 1982 Affidavit Re Westinghouse Application for Withholding Proprietary Info Encl in App C to FSAR in TR Tramm 820818 & 0902 Ltrs to NRC Concerning Turbine Missiles ML20023D0341982-07-26026 July 1982 Affidavit of SL Marello Re QC Breakdown & Criminal Falsification at Zack Co,Hvac Contractor at Facilities ML20023D0351982-07-26026 July 1982 Affidavit of at Howard Re QC Breakdown & Criminal Falsification at Zack Co,Hvac Contractor at Facilities ML20039G7411981-12-0707 December 1981 Affidavit Supporting NRC Motion to Dismiss Ucs & Ny Pirg Petitions for Review of NRC Decision Re Status of Offsite Radiological Emergency Response Plan.Emergency Planning Evaluation Process Incomplete.Related Correspondence ML20105D1201981-08-0404 August 1981 Affidavit of Bk Grimes Supplementing 810622 Affidavit Re Emergency Planning Earthquake Considerations.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098H1231977-12-0505 December 1977 Affidavit of Jd Perko Re Financial Qualifications Update ML20098H1221977-12-0202 December 1977 Affidavit of Dl Renberger Re Mgt Organization & QA ML20098H1241977-11-16016 November 1977 Affidavit of RB Gallup Re Need for Power Update ML20098C7661977-07-13013 July 1977 Affidavit of Jd Perko Re Corrections to Financial Qualifications Testimony ML20098C7591976-08-0202 August 1976 Affidavit of RB Gallup Re Need for Power Update ML20098C6911976-05-14014 May 1976 Affidavit of DW Connor Re Need for Proposed Units.Based on West Group Forecast Projection of Energy Loads & Capacities, Probable Need for Units 3 & 5 Greater than Yr Ago ML20235F0861970-08-0707 August 1970 Affidavit of Ej Walsh Supporting Util Request That Lloyd Harbor Study Group,Inc Motion Seeking Disqualification of Aec,Aslab & ASLB Members Be Denied.Incomplete Statement by Ej Walsh Requesting Motion Be Denied Encl ML20235F0451970-07-28028 July 1970 Affidavit of I Like in Support of Lloyd Harbor Study Group, Inc Motion for Order Seeking Relief Set Forth in Annexed Notice of Motion 1986-11-12
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARELV-01267, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 9002091990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 ML20011E4861990-02-0707 February 1990 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209 ML20248D2831989-09-28028 September 1989 Notice of Appearance.* Advises That Author Will Enter Appearance in Proceeding on Behalf of Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247Q2661989-09-26026 September 1989 Establishment of Aslb.* Board Will Comprise of Mb Margulies, Chairman & Oh Paris & Fj Shon,Members.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 890926 B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements1989-09-20020 September 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements ML20248C8751989-09-13013 September 1989 Response to Order Modifying Licenses & Order to Show Cause Why Licenses Should Not Be Revoked.* Requests Hearing on Issues,Including Funds for Equipment.Supporting Info Encl ML20246C7141989-08-18018 August 1989 Order to Show Cause Why CPs CPEP-1 & CPEP-2 Should Not Be Revoked & Requiring Licensee to Notify Commission at Least 30 Days Before Taking Possession of Any Classified Equipment ML20245G0721989-08-0303 August 1989 Comment on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. Recommends That NRC Recommendation on Trust Agreement Wording Be Deleted or NRC Should Grandfather Existing Trusts Such as for Plants ML20248B6201989-08-0202 August 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide, Assuring Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors. NRC Should Permit Use of Potential Tax Refund as Source of Decommissioning Funds ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement1989-07-0707 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 8906261989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626 ML20246K4801989-07-0505 July 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20246D8811989-06-30030 June 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components ML20245D2481989-06-16016 June 1989 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. NRC Must Consider Provision in Rule to Permit Indiscriminate Storage of Spent Fuel at Reactors ML20246Q2971989-05-15015 May 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20244B3241989-04-10010 April 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20247A2971989-04-0404 April 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20246M2771989-03-20020 March 1989 Decision.* Affirms Board Decision LBP-89-05 Granting CP & OL to Licensee.Certificate of Svc Encl.Served on 890321 B13113, Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility1989-03-0808 March 1989 Comments on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Reg Guide Does Not Provide Flexibility ML20246N9471989-03-0808 March 1989 Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9 Re Selection Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units Used as Onsite Electric Power Sys at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235V8541989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Util Committed to Goal of Achieving Improved Reliability & Safety Through Better Maint JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20235T3581989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Endorses Comments Filed by NUMARC & Nuclear Util Backfitting & Reform Group.Rule Fails to Provide Basis for Determining Effective Maint Program B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague1989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague ML20235T1861989-02-24024 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants, Extension of NRC Authority to BOP Portion of Plant & Misapplication of Adequate Protection Std of Backfit Rule ML20235T7391989-02-23023 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants ML20235N8531989-02-14014 February 1989 Comment Supporting Chapter 1 Re Policy Statement on Exemptions Below Regulatory Concern.Policy Development for Criteria for Release of Radioactive Matl Needed for Development of Consistent Waste Mgt Practices ML20235L5921989-02-0606 February 1989 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule on Chapter 1 Re Proposed Policy Statement Exemptions from Regulatory Control.Extreme Care Will Be Needed in Establishing State Role Both in Developing Rule & in Subsequent Implementation ML20247R4091988-12-31031 December 1988 Transcript of Commission 881221 Press Conference in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-31 ML20196F5981988-12-0101 December 1988 Notice of Hearing.* Notifies That Hearing to Be Held in CP Application Proceedings on 881221 Cancelled & Rescheduled to Commence on 890104.Served on 881202 ML20196F5831988-12-0101 December 1988 Memorandum Memoralizing 881129 Telcon.* Applicant & NRC Agreed to Submit Joint Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law.Served on 881202 ML20196A5991988-12-0101 December 1988 Transcript of 881201 Hearing in Bethesda,Md.Pp 143-152 ML20206M9181988-11-22022 November 1988 Memorandum Memorializing Telcon of 881121.* Discusses Board 881121 Telcon W/Counsel for Parties Re Prehearing & Scheduling Matters.Served on 881123 ML20206J3701988-11-21021 November 1988 Transcript of 881121 Telcon in Bethesda,Md Re Alchemie. Pp 70-100 ML20206M5321988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re fitness-for-duty Program ML20195H0331988-11-21021 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing.Util Strongly Favors 180- Day Period for Implementation of Rule & 360-day Implementation Period for Random Drug Testing JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments1988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments ML20195H0111988-11-18018 November 1988 Comment Supporting NUMARC Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re NRC Fitness for Duty Program Which Includes Random Drug Testing ML20206C6321988-11-14014 November 1988 Withdrawal of Request of State of Tn to Participate as Interested State,Per 10CFR2.715(c).* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C6131988-11-14014 November 1988 Withdrawal of Request of State of Tn to Participate as Interested State,Per 10CFR2.715(c).* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C3271988-11-10010 November 1988 Memorandum Memorializing Telcon of 881109.* Licensee Request to DOE to Extend Deadline for Receipt of CPs Until 890131 Not Officially Passed Upon.Further Prehearing Telcon Scheduled for 881121.Served on 881114 ML20206C0851988-11-0909 November 1988 Transcript of ASLB 881109 Telcon in Bethesda,Md.Pp 44-69 ML20205R7111988-11-0404 November 1988 NRC Staff Testimony of Jj Swift Addressing ASLB Inquiries Dtd 881018.* Supporting Info Encl.Related Correspondence ML20206C1081988-11-0404 November 1988 Requests for Renewal or Extension of Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(i) Re Property Insurance Regulations ML20205N2711988-11-0101 November 1988 Memorandum Memorializing Telcon of 881031.* Board Approved Prehearing Telcon on 881109 to Discuss Future Scheduling & Agreed to Start Hearing Prior to 881120 to Accomodate Alchemie.Served on 881102 ML20205Q2061988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM 50-52 Re Exemption of Financial Qualifications of Applicants from Review of OL Applications.Petition Presents No Compelling Reason to Amend Current Rules ML20205Q1501988-10-28028 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Safety Sys Functional Insps & Configuration Mgt Programs Support Renewal Basis as Opposed to Relicensing Process ML20205Q6661988-10-27027 October 1988 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear Plant License Renewal. Endorses NUMARC Nuplex Working Group Comments,Including Use of Licensing Basis at Facility When Renewal Application Submitted ML20205P9691988-10-26026 October 1988 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re NUREG-1317, Regulatory Options for Nuclear License Renewal. Supports Contents of NUREG-1317 & Endorses NUMARC Comments on Rulemaking & Position Paper by NUMARC Nuplex Working Group 1990-02-07
[Table view] |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,
t UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(
In the Matter of Washington Public Power
)
Docket No. 50-513 Supply System
)
(WPPSS Nuclear Project
)
No. 4)
)
' AFFIDAVIT OF DUANE L. RENBERGER t
REGARDING. MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION ANE QUALITY ASSURANCE In an effort to assure that the evidentiary record in this proceeding
(~
is complete and reflects the most current information, the Washington Public Power Supply System (" Applicant") herein provides a summary of a recent change in management organization. This change was prompted by the
(
perceived needs of the various nuclear projects being constructed by the Applicant for a broader top management organization.
In Chapter 13 and 17 of the Preliminary Safety Analysis Report (PSAR)
(
for WPPSS Nuclear Projects Nos.1 and 4, the management organization set forth includes several Division Managers (e.g., Finance, Operations, Tech-nical and Projects Divisions), all of whom reported to the Deputy Managing Director in the office of the Managing Director.
(
This organization was established at a time when Applicant was engaged in constructing a single nuclear project (WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 2). The Applicant is now in the process of constructing five nuclear projects, g
which are at various stages of construction.
In these circumstances, it was determined that a revision in top management organization was appro-priate to provide top management guidance and control for all nuclear l
projects.
8409g0516840824
_1_
PDR f
DHEN8 -603
(
Accordingly, the Applicant has revised the structure of its top manage-L ment organization. Attached hereto are organization charts which reflect these organization changes. Under the revised organization, the duties of the Deputy Managing Director have been assigned to three Assistant Directors f
who have responsibility for certain organizational divisions. The Assis-tant Director for Projects now has responsibility for each of the Projects Divisions and for construction activities. The Assistant Director for
,L Generation and Technology.has; responsibility for Technical, Engineering, Plant Operations, and Generation Services Divisions. The Assistant Director for Finance and Administration has responsibility for Finance, Admini-
- ('
stration, and Materials Management Divisions (Figure 1).
Significantly, the reorganization was effected in a manner which assures the continued separation of cost and schedule responsibility from
(
technical and quality assurance responsibility. As is noted on the attached organization charts, the WPPSS QA Department Manager reports to the Manager, Technical Division, and has direct access to the Assistant Director, Genera-(
tion and Technology, and other Assistant Directors and the Managing Director.
The Manager of QA is responsible for developing and administering the WPPSS QA Program which he performs through the Quality Services Supervisor,
(
Project QA Managers for each project and the Operational QA Manager as shown on Figure 2.
Development of the program and auditing of its implemen-tation is the function of Quality Services. The Project QA sections, each
~
(
headed by a Project QA Manager, are responsible for administering the implementation of the program at the project level including interfacing 1
with the AE/CM and the NSSS Contractor. Operational QA has no design-construction phase responsibilities.
g,
(
=
t The Project Manager does not exercise control over the activities of O
the Project Quality Assurance staff. The Project Manager provides coord4-nation of QA activities.with project activities (Figure 3). Administrative and technical direction regarding specific implementation of the QA Program
(
.come from the Manager Quality Assurance. The project management and project QA organizations are both audited by the Quality Services Section for the effectiveness of their implementation of the QA Program.
(
In accordance with the " Management Statement" (Attachment 1), which is
~
included in the preface to each WPPSS QA Program Manual, the Quality Assur-ance staff has complete authority, including stop work authority, to assure o
that design and construction activities confonn with quality requirements.
In the case of conflicts between the Project QA Organization and the Project Management Organization, the Project QA Manager has direct access
,t to the Manager, Quality Assurance, and thence to successively higher levels of WPPSS Management until the problem is resolved.
The NRC staff has reviewed the above described management reorgani-A zation in the context of the WNP-3/5 PSAR Review (Amendment 40). The staff
(
reported favorably on the reorganization as it relates to the Applicant's technical qualifications in an affidavit submitted by Mr. Frederick R. Allenspach (Staff Exhibit 20, WNP-3/5). The staff reported favorably on reorganization c
as it relates to the Applicant's Quality Assurance Program in an affidavit submitted by Mr. John R. Costello (Staff Exhibit 19, WNP-3/5).
Effective December 1,1977, the Engineering Division was reorganized
(
as shown on Figure 4.
This new organization basically represents a realign-ment of the Central Engineering, Engineering Programs, and Safety and Analysis Departments from the prior organization. This realignment is i '
1 E-
(
+
4 intended to strengthen the design engineering support for all WPPSS projects.
(
The Applicant commits, as a post construction permit item, to amend the PSAR to reflect the above described _ changes in Management Organization and Quality Assurance.
c0 M #2~ & toev D. L. Renberger Assistant Director Generation and Technology Subscribedandsworn[w,foreme be
(~
this dd day of /
da v, 1977 Yis $ tf h agu w Notary Public in and for the State i
of it/dLL
/
(
(
(
(
(
1 4-i.
I
.-,~n,-.
,,-nn..
7,,-.-,--
n..nw.
iu,.
i WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SY" TEM MANAGEMENT STATEMENT t
t Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS) is committed to the WPPSS Quality Assurance Program to assure that WPPSS Nuclear Projects are designed, constructed and operated safely, reliably and efficiently. Adherence to the
(
WPPSS Quality Assurance Program as defined in the (Design and Construction)
Quality Assurance' Program Manual, the Operational Quality Assurance Program Description and implementing procedures and instructions by all WPPSS personnel is mandatory.
The guidance and criteria presented in the Quality Assurance Program Manuals
(
are official WPPSS policiest as indicated by. approval signatures of the Assistant Director, Generatbn and Technology, the Manager, Technical Division and the Manager, Quality Assurance. The scope of activities controlled by the WF/SS Quality Assurance Program includes engineering, design, procurement, fabrication, manufacture, installation, erection, construction, maintenance modification, testing, and operation of applicable structures, systems and components of WPPSS Nuclear Projects.
3, In addit on, WPPSS personnel shall assure that specifications and contracts i
include requirements for implementation by consultants, vendors, fabricators, constructors and subcontractors of all applicable requ.irements of the WPPSS Quality Assurance Program.
Items required by design specification to meet
?
ASME Code Section III, Divisions 1 and/or 2, shall be designed, manufactured g
4 and assemoled by organizations holding the apolicable ASME Certificate of Authori zation. These items and systems shall be stamped and the required data reports issued in accordance with ASME Code, Section III requirements.
The Manager, Quality Assurance, assisted by members of the Quality Assurance Department, is responsible for developing, administering and assuring imple-(
mentation of the WPPSS Quality Assurance Program.
The WPoSS Cuality Assurance Department has the responsibility and authority, including Stop Work Authority to perfonn the actions necessary to accomplish their mandate as delineated in the Quality Assurance Program Manuals.
N. O. Stranc
(
Managing Director I
l l
{
l t May, 1977 l
a
+
a
._a A
(
N N
4 a
L.
U
(
.O E
e Q
3 2:
e i
i E
2 l
e O
T q
e W
M g
2 e
i j
O
=
w e-t
(.
2 z
as suu
==
g g
3 3
Z 4
3 3
2 m
a
=
a B:
I I
I O
2 8
a
(-
m 3
.E M
O p.
u a
.u, ae.
a.
e
=a
('
&n a.
O 3
o e
M e
O 2
m a
o o
O m
w 3
g
=
m g
Z w
a 4
0 e
,a 3
w e
-a i
'd
-5 as 3::
O
-.7 3
g
< v
=
==
g tg 2
y 3
a I
g g
w g U
3 =5 Z
Ed a
e' E
Z a
e w
I Y
t 3
e m
4 I
I I
J E
a e
tas as Y
S q
O O
(
Y
.a m
at fE a
o :- a.
I
<a 2 ** a
.e 4
E s
g
.e.
a as e
-{
t W
l e6 e=
5 E
=
=
==
-k
~ "*
e 44 eZ 4 5 a
v "E $
I
-c s
q 8
e e
g4 Z
a m
a g
e Z
g h
4 o
W E
o
(
es
}
4 Oj mw w
8 3
I I
I e
8 a.
een O
=
Pe em 9
4 1
1 1
,__....-_.x
l
, i i
r
~
'F F
9
~
3' 1
I R
t t
O T
C O
m L
L A
A G
I I
I L
NN N
S L
A 5
AI I
RI E 1 E
PG 5
ME MC I
N M NE N N CO E
N t
NL MA OI Oi I
N RI G R
Rl O R
C E
G I S PG O
V N V
O E
5 R
N J
I R t
E l
E VP 1
N 1
E V
=
5 V
t 1
8 51 E
4 P
5 Y
V 2
/
Y /
C P
E l
I P i3 N
l U
C t P l N l P A
l l
l L
A S
I AN AW A N N U V
R R
UW UI U
L OI OE O {W O5 R
E E
I S 2
E C
S m
W C
I A
V E
C A
l I
N I
I I C A
R N
l A IV C
N C N R
E I
l l
EC C
O N
R E A E
Y E
P A
l J A J
J A 1
U H
R Pe U U A
OR OU OR Ot G
C 5
I i
I Q5 u
R U R 5 R
t U
A E
t A
O P5 P 5 P
U 5
F 5
5 A
t 4
A Q
u
~
=
=
P k
0 1
S
(
E h
85 I
D e
L Y
5 u
l A
Y t
l P
l C
L l
A I
P h
A N
U l
S N
L W
Nl A
A Li t
C D
t a
I I
E N
I U u
R
&S O
H I
f C
C E
t t
I u
p
=
=
e Ygg i,~
j l:
- i 4
- ljg
.i ri j 1
1
}
1 lljl
!Ii im k
t m
,w 7
7 9
1 I.
R E
I S
N O
A I
L C
P a
O a
4
/
l -
P N
W e %'
P U
I R
A I
S y
=
M N
N E
O 5
N l
O T
B I
I V
O C
C 5
m t
U U
i R
R Y
C I
I L
U 5
S E
P R
N N
P I
O O
S U
I N
C C
S C
O E
R C
J E
O
=
3 W
R O
P E
P 4
R e
U K
B/,
G t
P I
B F
U N
P W
N E
O C
V I
I N C
l A
N TAR I
H U U 5
5 OS a
A A
W N
N 6
MI MI D
D A
A 5
I I
5 C
C A
E E
N J
R E
4 O
I 5
N U
R S
P O
C m
G N
I I
CRE E
l J E O N I
R G P
N
(
J.
+
(
e
$, i
- ji 4
4 l1!
l l4 l
!1
w t
~
n
~
Figure 4 December 1,1977
'd I
WPPSS Engineering (DivisionManager)
Engineering Design Proj. Engrg Proj. Engrg Proj. Engrg Proj. Engrg Services Engineering WNP-l/4 WNP-2 WNP-3/5 General Projects 4
Facilities Hechanical/
Design Design &
Design Engrg Nuclear Engrg Engrg Field Engrg Engrg i
Engrg Civil /
Field Field j
Admin.
Environ.
Engrg Engrg Electrical /
I&C Engrg l
l i
.}}