ML20087N793

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Affidavit of Rl Marks,Providing Accurate Definition of Pullman Power Products Quality Intentions
ML20087N793
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 03/19/1984
From: Marks R
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML16340E243 List:
References
NUDOCS 8404040410
Download: ML20087N793 (7)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _

EXHIBIT NO. 7

(, '

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARD

)

In the Matter of )

) Docket Nos. 50-275 PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC ) 50-323 COMPANY )

(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power

) (Construction Quality Assurance) k

)

Plant, Units 1 and 2) )

)

AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD L. MARKS STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

) ss.

COUNTY OF )

SAN LUIS OBISPD )

I, Richard L. Marks, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

I am currently employed by PGandE as a member of the onsite Diablo Canyon PGandE Corporation QA/QC Organization. From April 1974 to January 1984 I was employed in the Pullman Power Products Quality Control Group.

1.

Because of the recent allegations and media coverage and concerns, I am submitting this affidavit for the purpose of more accurately defining Pullman Power Products quality intentions than the ideas and opinions expressed by those with enly brief encounters with the firm. Al though no longer with the Pullman Company, I feel a personal obligation to

([)' stand up for what is true, t

S404040410 840319

,: PDR ADOCK 05000275 0

PDR _

2. 1. nas been recently stated that individuals would be chastised or even fired if he/she were to bring up too many problems; and that the Q.C.

hierarchy would smother or ignore quality problems for the sake of time schedules and job completions. This is absolutely untrue and inaccurate. In ten years with the Company I saw only a handful of inspectors fired and in each case it was deserved. Not one person was ever fired because of, or relating to, problem finding or even chastised for such activities. The only chastisement an individual ever received was for an inability to function in the job he/she was hired to do.

3. One would only have to look at the vast amount of documented discrepant condition notices and discrepancy reports that exist from other inspectors' findings to realize that no chastisement or firing was ever done because of problem finding. As for Pullman's quality intent, I I

personally watched one document used for erecting and inspecting pipe supports grow from approximately 20 pages in 1974 to 131 pages at present. A large portion of those additions came about because of concerns that inspectors and Q.C. management had. A vast amount of other documents and procedures also grew in the same fasnion.

4. The evidence against the inference that Pullman Q.C. management suppressed problems brought to their attention, is. overwhelming. I believe the motives of each person making such allegations should be examined thoroughly. My personal belief is that some of these individuals had ulterior motives when the.y hired on (i.e., anti-nuclear sympathizers); some had personal problems with management and. devised a way to retaliate; and those that were fired just jumped on the l

1 bureaucratic bandwagon seeking retaliation and re-employment. In each case, I believe their underlying motive outweighs the reality of their statements and is in fact, the reason for their fabricatio.ns. As far as each ' objective allegation goes, I'm glad that the NRC does exist for the safety of everyone; but is the NRC possibly being used unfairly and deviously in a stall tactic?

DATED: March 19,1984

(-

fY NW Richard L. Marks Subscribed and sworn to before me this 19th day of March,1984 tadn5 m L Wendy Sproul u i Notary Public in and for the County of San Luis Obispo, p ____

State of California. j OFFicrAL SEAL

^^

My comission expires wsNoy 3ppogt June 30, 1986 i "07* austic . cat,,o 3,4

_ _ _3 "* 'eSEx7[us, ,

O i

i EXtIIBIT NO. 8 o.E

, ca.,, 4 .n MINOR VARIATION REPORT j re4s4 nie ioanneicanoN : T'aSlo Canyon E' 2 '"E*'E*4R-5680A s 1 .e 1 Jg.no a.seoa ci s%ncE P G and E - G.C. Instrumentation la. sere.ency N. N/A uva No E-231R j s e m i. c. air i. O v. gu. yfa ossCnienom or oisCREPANCY 2LT-943 Containment wide range pressure #2 ITT Barton Model 764 differential pressure electronic transmitter j S/N 1626 does not meet the static pressure effect specification of 10.2%

of input span Der 1000 osio (see attached data). i l

in.. a av gg o*'* 1-21-82 '

I ciscosinow /hr$ect. Return'to vendor for repair or replacement. _

V 9

w """'

4 ma =asa M , . ,_ N/A

s , si. a === g Q R__/F

~

1-22-82

, n m ,v.n n in ' % i. m'., n ,= .: a % n. n ,, . to, nei. iocea r.re 21:

n.

V i, (i. . N a, -

- 'v ~' ' x WM y *"

/-z c-gr a s , si. a =a=== g g ggg/f/

' -~

1-22-82 otSPOSITION ACCOMPi.!SHEo

, bornar.s

. in_. . m,.

, Ceehty Contr.8 04 .

I k ^"^*""'" 1) Test Report PRIORITY _

G. * .A e _m o 9 $a. .,

DISCREPANCY REPORT "nr.e. !!o. 9800 tarc i c 1

  • r.t./Cupp. Westinghouse Can'. . /?'r" . I . D . !!o . N4 MS.: : o. E-1811 INSFECTION SECTION
icererant Iten: Unit II, POS-242 and POS-243, Position Switches for Valve 8149C.

Exnl.cnation of Discrennney: Position Switches POS-242 and P05 243 are nissing.

We are unable to locate them.

- [^.,

Lei.t Ener./Irfc;e tor _ .Z-28-77 Date CLASSIFICATION 8 DISPOSITION ttinor variatien g reviation Disresitica: Reject. . Repair in the field as follows:

Replace with spare Class I Position Switches from 1 HCV-142. H.P. Foley to mount position switches on Valve 8149C and terminate according to Dwg. #502666. Proper operation of POS-242 and POS-243 to be verified by performance of Loop Test 8-63C.

The folicwing eembers of the l'aterial Review Board cor.citr with the above Dispositicn:

(For "inor Varictions , cnly Res ident En>31neer's cirnatarc rs.1,uired. )

1 1 L _ 1 Resident [;ineer ,

Date

Iame Date :tanc DCL*

ilace Datc ?n=c Datc l __

l Responsi' ole Engineer Dato Suuerv!:ine Seineer Date OlSPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED "e: arks: Class I spare position switches from 1HCV-142 were installed by H. P. Foley as 2POS-242 and 2POS-243. . Their operation was ve ified by performance of Loop Test 8-63C. g ge#Fi 8-19-77 ST/:1d En-! .cc rf'nenactor Onte STEPS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE (3,y;3eic33 ony,[)

~

~ ~~a . : : . . e-p.>e.

-:or.l en

Attachment:

.4:nset Cx r.let-d

,'onr.0.C.Cn. r Dt e.-C. A* QA-24 (orig. only) .

ro.l . ."im e r Ilen n. Pne r

. n '., ant En:*r. Pro.t .Drr. *

  • ' k / 7 7-

. A . ':1?e T,. 7.' 7 T ,7 i r..o r Dupv.Insp.Ener.(0.0.) .9 * .t e;

~ ~

e n .. . . : s . t .* m.

a'

  • I
  • _

' ^

'/ #101941-2 Sht. 56 9800 DISCREPANC'/ REPORT Cnec. !!o. Pace 1 or 1 Cen t . /C*.r:p . N/A Cen t . / Cur.p . I . D . I!o . _ _ N/A_ , _ _ PCfl *Io. _E-1786 Rev. 1 INSPECTION SECTION Dicerer, ant Iten: Drawing #101941-2 sheet 56 (Bill of Materials - Controle consoles and vertical boards).

Explanation of Discrenancy: MVR E-1786 was written in error. Drawing #101941-2, sheet 56 was correct in its original configunation.

M // , [e " 11/1/77 ield Br:r./nsncetor Date CLASSIFICATION & DISPOSITION Deviation ftinor Varintien Q Disposition: Accept #101941-2 as is. Cancel drawing #101941-2 sheet 56 AS-rBUILT sketch #3e.

The following members of the !faterial Review Board concur with the above Disnositicn: '

(For !!inor Variations, only Resident Engineer's sicnature required.)

AS BUILT 11/ A3fjst2l ~

11/nI77 Residedt Engineer Date Na:::e Date  ! Tame . Date Came Date lla=e Dutc l

Responsible Engineer Date Sutervising &gineer Date l

DISPOSITION ACCOMPLISHED Rc= arks: Drawing #101941-2 sketch Rev. 3e was cancelled.

_.11/11/77 Fif/d e Fn-ineer#*nsnector D'te STEPSTO PREVENT RECURRENCE (reviations onl:

'~n cen. cet- neer [ cc.te Copies Attachments Rerort Comrleted Ocor.0.C.h nr Dir.-C.A. 1) QA-24 (orig. only) . /

Pro.1.Duc er Resn.r:.r-Pesicient Scr. Pro.1.~nir.

' A . ", i t e q;.1 (Rev. 12-16-76)

Supv.Insp. Engr.(G.O.)

g,, y__f 8

.,. $.,, Y.g,.9 ,,A[f //.Ja/pr page m*. m . e. .

! w-L.

I <

8802 DISCREPANCY REPORT

, Cnec. No. Page 1 of 1

'ont./Supp.

. Cont./Sunp.I.D. No. PG&E No. E-1751 INSPECTION SECTION Discrepant Item: Diagrams of connection 452607-1 and 452615-1.

Explanation of Discrenancy: Diagrams are not functionally correct. The polarity of the wirine to 2FI-113B is reversed (CKT #113R$03):

M M - [e #

5-20-77

+

{<FieldEngr.(Inspector Date CLASSIFICATION & DISPOSITION Deviation

, Minor Variation Q Disposition: Reject. Repair in the field in accordance with the following procedure:

Modify installation drawings 452607-1 and 452615-1 by addition of the attached sketches. Modification meets original design intent.

i  %

The following members of the Material

/

av e

conc'

/viththe above Disposition:

(For !iinor Variations, only Residen neer' s na e re red.)

AS BUILT g y- ,

9

/ % _ f -23.77

% sid @ Engineer Date Name gV Name Date

g. ) A ,f N 7 Name Date Responsible' / Sutervising Engineer Date DISPOSITION ACCOM 4

Remarks: Insta11at dra i s 452 607-1 and 452615-1 modified by addition of j attached sketches.

_F)ffd1+k R' M Eneineer/Insnector G-4-77 Date STEPSTO PREVENT RECORRENCE (reviations Onik Me= < ten t. <cr i n.. r Unt.c Copica Attachments Report Completed coor.0.C. Engr Dir.-Q.A. As Built 452607-1 Proj.0uner Resn.Ihrr As Built 452615-1 Perident Ener. Pro 1.Entr.

0.A.-Gite Supv.Insp. Engr.(G.O.)

_L?Y\ a.v' 6 b ')

en n ,.,99 ., t n, CO/nrineer /D6te

. ,