|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20217N7201998-03-31031 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.55a,inservice Inspection & Inservice Testing of Nuclear Power Plant Components ML20203J9661998-02-27027 February 1998 Comment on GL 98-XX, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps ML18067A6301997-07-0707 July 1997 Comment Supporting NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Charges,Tests or Experiments). DD-97-15, Director'S Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request1997-06-18018 June 1997 Director'S Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request ML20115H7061996-06-0404 June 1996 Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR ML18065A0761995-09-13013 September 1995 Comment on Draft Rg DG-1043 Re Proposed Rev 2 to Rg 1.149. New Malfunction Tests Required by Revised Rg Can Be Tested at Required 25% Per Year & Reported in Next 4-yr Testing Rept W/O Rev to Test Plan ML20086D9031995-06-29029 June 1995 Comments on Proposed Generic Ltr Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Proposed GL Also Avoids Unnecessary Expense for Requirements That Provide No Benefit ML18064A8201995-06-27027 June 1995 Comment on Proposed GL Re Relocation of Pressure Temperature Limit Curves & Low Temperature Overpressure Protection Sys Limits.Supports Issuance of Ltr ML20085E6541995-06-13013 June 1995 Comment Re Draft NUREG/BR-0199, Responsiveness to Public. Expresses Concern on Dry Cask Storage W/Exemption Given to VSC-24 Cask & Procedures for Unloading & Transport at Plant ML18064A7681995-05-26026 May 1995 Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power Operated Gate Valves. ML20073M0621994-09-29029 September 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of NUHOMS 52B Dry Casks to List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks. Objects to Proposed Rule Because of Substantial Differences Between Fuel Rods & Assemblies at Different Plant ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning ML20012G5301993-02-26026 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Suggests That NRC Conduct Formal Hearing ML20012G5311993-02-24024 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20012G5331993-02-23023 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20012G5341993-02-23023 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20012G5321993-02-23023 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20012G5231993-02-20020 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20012G5251993-02-15015 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20128L9531993-02-10010 February 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127E8851993-01-15015 January 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127E8631993-01-14014 January 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127F0561993-01-0808 January 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116N9171992-11-12012 November 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116K9591992-11-0909 November 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted ML20116L4651992-11-0606 November 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116L0501992-11-0303 November 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted ML20116K7851992-11-0303 November 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116L1811992-11-0202 November 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116L2051992-11-0202 November 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116L3341992-10-30030 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998 ML20116L2881992-10-26026 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116L1311992-10-22022 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998 ML20116L2841992-10-22022 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20116L2681992-10-22022 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998 ML20116K9861992-10-22022 October 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Deadly Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Stated Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998 ML20127E1371992-09-16016 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A4721992-09-14014 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A4081992-09-14014 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A4011992-09-14014 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A3981992-09-11011 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127D6611992-09-0909 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A3831992-09-0909 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A4521992-09-0909 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127D6241992-09-0909 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127D9421992-09-0909 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127D6331992-09-0909 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A4111992-09-0808 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20106A3671992-09-0808 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule ML20127D7191992-09-0606 September 1992 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule 1998-03-31
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20071N4031982-10-0505 October 1982 Motion for Indefinite Continuance of Proceeding.Need for Steam Generator Replacement Alleviated Due to Better than Expected Corrosion Performance of Steam Generator Tubes. Future Rate of Corrosion Unpredictable.W/Certificate of Svc ML20038C1621981-12-0808 December 1981 Response Opposing Christa-Maria 811204 Motion for Indefinite Extension of Time to Respond to Licensee & NRC Motions for Summary Dispostion.Time to Respond Already Extended & Contentions Insubstantial.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140B4781981-08-31031 August 1981 Response to Aslab 810824 Order to Show Cause Why Appeal Should Not Be Dismissed as Untimely.Untimely Filing Due to Misunderstanding Re Computation of Commission Time Limits for Appeal Filings ML20010D1381981-08-17017 August 1981 Brief,In Form of Pleading,On Appeal from ASLB 810721 Order Denying Petition for Hearing Re 810309 Order Confirming Licensee Actions to Upgrade Facility Performance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18046A7511981-05-28028 May 1981 Reply Supporting Util Workers' Union of America & Mi Util Workers Council 810331 Request for Hearing on Overtime Restrictions Imposed by NRC 810309 Order.Requested Hearing Would Not Involve Labor/Mgt Dispute.Proof of Svc Encl ML19343D1661981-03-31031 March 1981 Requests Hearing on Commission 810309 Order.Restrictions on Overtime Were Imposed W/O Consulting Union Which Is Collective Bargaining Agent for Operating,Maint & Const Employees.Commission Stds Are Not as Restrictive ML18046A2561980-12-0101 December 1980 Response to NRC 801107 Requests for Admissions.Admits That Two Manual Containment Isolation Valves in Containment Bldg Penetration 4a Were Found Locked Open on 790911.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18045A7771980-10-0606 October 1980 Motion to Compel More Specific Answers from NRC to Second Round of Interrogatories 1 Through 4.Requested Info Needed in Detail in Order to Determine If Discretion Abused. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML18045A3831980-07-18018 July 1980 Response in Opposition to NRC 800703 Motion for Protective Order Re CPC 800221 Interrogatories & Requests for Production of Documents.Relief Not Warranted Per ALAB-594. W/Certificate of Svc ML18045A2531980-06-13013 June 1980 Supplemental Motion to Compel NRC Response to 800225 Interrogatories 2 Through 5,13 Through 15 & 17.Matl Not Privileged,Relevant or Necessary to Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML18045A2241980-05-14014 May 1980 Motion to Compel NRC to Produce Documents Requested in Util Interrogatories 2,3,4,5,12,13,14,15 & 17.Util Will Review NRC Objections Re Other Matls.Certificate of Svc Encl. Related Correspondence ML19290D5851980-01-29029 January 1980 Answers to 800117 Notice of Hearing.Noncompliance Item 1 of 791109 Notice of Violation Miscategorized.Civil Penalties Imposed Per 791220 Order Abused Discretion Entrusted to NRC Per Atomic Energy Act ML18043A8131979-05-30030 May 1979 Consumers Power Opposition to Great Lakes Energy Alliance 790509 Prehearing Conference Statement,Amended Contentions & Request for Financial Assistance.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19263E8691979-05-0707 May 1979 States Key Issues for Consideration at 790509 Prehearing Conference.Nrc Should Provide Funds to Intervenor So Latter May Exercise Legal Rights & Assist ASLB in Finding of Facts. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19269D9241979-05-0404 May 1979 Applicant Answer Opposing Great Lakes Energy Alliance 790420 Response.Response Does Not Cure Defects Found in Earlier Submission.Alliance Petition to Intervene Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19289E9631979-04-20020 April 1979 Responds to Nrc,Consumers Power Co & ASLB Re Intervention in Hearings on Steam Generator Replacement.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19282C3811979-02-27027 February 1979 Great Lakes Energy Alliance Petition to Intervene & Statement of Contentions.W/Attached Article on Pipe Corrosion ML19331A3741974-11-0101 November 1974 Response to Saginaw Intervenors' Motion for Discovery in Aid of Oral Argument.Discusses Saginaw Intervenors' Procedural Deficiencies.Requests That Motion Be Denied.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19331A3791974-10-0909 October 1974 Memorandum Opposing Saginaw Intervenors' 740930 Petition to Reopen Record &/Or for Reconsideration of Initial Decision. Petition Untimely & Issues Raised Are Insignificant to Plant Safety & Should Be Denied.Proof of Svc Encl 1982-10-05
[Table view] |
Text
e
., 10/5/82 UOLKETED T UNITED STATES OF AMERICA "C NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ..
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD M -7 P2 :40 CFFICE OF SECRETARY Before Administrative Judges 00CHETt g SERvfCC James A. Laurenson, Chairman Dr. George C. Anderson Dr. M. Stanley Livingstca In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-255-OLA
)
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY )
)
(Palisades Nuclear Power Facility) )
LICENSEE'S MOTION FOR AN INDEFINITE CONTINUANCE In 1978, Consumers Power Company (" Licensee")
filed an application with the NRC seeking permission to remove and replace the plant's steam generators. On July 23, 1979 the Licensing Board issued a Special Pre-hearing Conference Order in this matter which admitted Great Lakes Energy Alliance ("GLEA") as a party.
On June 23, 1982, this Board issued an Order requiring each party to the proceeding to file a statement
! on or before July 12, 1982 concerning the status of this proceeding. Licensee and NRC Staff filed such state-ments; GLEA did not respond to the Order.
On September 21, 1982 the Board held a prehearing l conference in St. Joseph, Michigan to inquire further into the status of the steam generator replacement proposal and
( B210000082 B21005 I PDR ADOCK 05000255 2 -
_ __ DSB
the future course of this proceeding. Licensee and the NRC Staff attended but no representative of GLEA appeared.
The Staff moved to dismiss GLEA for its failure to appear.
(Tr. 206-208).
At the close of the September 21, 1982 prehearing conference the Board indicated that it would issue an Order to GLEA to Show Cause why this proceeding should not be dis-missed for want of prosecution by GLEA. Such an Order was in fact issued on September 23, 1982. In addition, at the prehearing conference the Board directed Licensee to file within two weeks this motion formally setting forth Licensee's request for an indefinite deferral of this proceeding. The Board indicated that it would rule first on whether this proceeding should be dismissed due to GLEA's lack of prosecution; if the proceeding is not to be dismissed on this ground, the Board will consider whether to grant or deny Licensee's motion for an indefinite deferral. (Tr. 212-213).
The considerations underlying Licensee's request for an indefinite deferral of this proceeding have been set forth in Licensee's response to this Board's Order dated l June 23, 1982 and were thoroughly explored by the Board in
! the September 21, 1982 prehearing conference. They need not i be extensively rehearsed here. The need for steam generator l replacement has been alleviated due to the better than l expected corrosion performance of the steam generator tubes in recent years. (Tr. 179-180). Unfortunately, there are substantial' uncertainties in predicting the future rate of I
l
O i corrosion in the Palisados steam generators. These un-certainties are compounded by the failure of two tubes in March, 1982 due to a kind of corrosion never before observed at Palisades. OTr. 180-82) The first time Licensee is likely to have substantially more information concerning the corrosion mechanism which caused these steam generator tube failures will 4
be in 1984, after the results of steam generator tube inspections made during the next refueling outage become available. Licensee is making every effort to prolong the life of the steam generators at Palisades. OTr. 179) Licensee does not want 4 to commit to the substantial expense and occupational exposure associated with replacing the steam generators until such time as it becomes necessary. (Tr. 185, 189).
Under the circumstances, Licensee is unable to predict with confidence the probable future date of replacement of the Palisades steam generators. The Company respectfully requests that this proceeding be deferred indefinitely, if it is not dis-missed due to GLEA's lack of prosecution. Such a deferral, rather than withdrawal of the application, would appear to be of some advantage to Licensee in the event that the rate of corrosion damage accelerates in the future, rcquiring
. speedy processing of its application. The primary advantage lies in the fact that the initial stages of an NRC ad-judicatory proceeding have already been accomplished and would not need to be repeated, thus avoiding unnecessary delay.
1' It should be clear from this motion, and from Licensee's statements at.the prehearing conference, that the delay in this docket has been and continues to be the res-ponsibility of the Licensee. It is not attributable to any lack of diligence on the part of the NRC.
Respectfully submitted, b4 P . _M'.colo1 Philip 5P. Steptoe\ h Agg One of the Attorneys for Consumers Power Company Isham, Lincoln & Beale 3 First National Plaza Chicago, Illinois 60602 (312) 558-7500 Dated: October 5, 1982 1
\
(
5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges James A. Laurenson, Chairman Dr. George C. Anderson Dr. M. Stanley Livingston In the Matter of ) Docket No. 50-255-OLA
)
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY )
)
(Palisades Nuclear Power Facility) )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Philip P. Steptoe, one of the attorneys for Consumers Power Company, hereby certify that a copy of
" Licensee's Motion For an Indefinite Continuance" was served upon all persons shown in the attached service list by deposit in the United States mail, first class, this 5th day of October, 1982. n fi .
1
\ J A u PhiI'ip P. Steptoe
. AfW
!j '
SUBSCRIBED ND SWORN be fore me this day of October, 1982. .
auAV x' a w a ,a w v Notary Public Ey Commission Expires January Ig isoJ
. . _ . . . .- = . -. - . -
SERVICE LIST
, l' James A. Laurenson, Esq., Chairman
- . Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Dr. M. Stanley Livingston Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board _
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
, Washington, D. C. 20555 Dr. George C. Anderson Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing. Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal l Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Judd L. Bacor_, Esq.
Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 i
Great Lakes Energy Alliance c/o Ms. Mary Sinclair 5711 Summerset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 Docketing and' Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 l
l . _ - . . - . - . . - . - . . . , , - _ , - . . . . - - - . - ~ . .- ... - , - . , , , , ,,,