Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, ... further results|Request]]
- Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: ML19112A318, ML20006E044, ML20024F053, ML20024F063, ML20026A002, ML20091J918, ML20091J919, ML20091L448, ML20092G718, ML20297A321, ML20297A325, ML20297A360, ML20309A853, ML20316A008, ML20318A379, ML21126A008, ML21126A013, ML21147A553
|
MONTHYEARML18066A0442018-03-0202 March 2018
March 2, 2018 Vermont Yankee Settlement Agreement
Project stage: Request
ML18066A7352018-03-0202 March 2018
Settlement Agreement Between Entergy, Northstar, State of Vermont Agencies, and Others Related to the Proposed Purchase and Sale of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Station (License DPR-28, Docket No. 50-271)
Project stage: Request
3F0618-02, Site Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate2018-06-27027 June 2018
Site Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Project stage: Request
ML18156A1792018-08-15015 August 2018
Issuance of Amendment to Change the Permanently Defueled
Project stage: Request
BVY 18-033, Registration of Spent Fuel Cask Use and Notification of Permanent Removal of All Spent Fuel Assemblies from the Spent Fuel Pool2018-08-16016 August 2018
Registration of Spent Fuel Cask Use and Notification of Permanent Removal of All Spent Fuel Assemblies from the Spent Fuel Pool
Project stage: Request
ML18242A6392018-10-11011 October 2018
Safety Evaluation of License Transfer Request (License DPR-28, Docket Nos. 50-271 and 72-59
Project stage: Request
ML19077A2322019-03-18018 March 2019
Applicants Answer Opposing the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request
Project stage: Request
ML19091A1892019-04-0101 April 2019
Watch Reply to Applicants Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request
Project stage: Request
ML19116A1622019-04-26026 April 2019
Watch Motion to Supplement Its Motion to Intervene and Request for Hearing. New Information
Project stage: Request
ML19112A3182019-06-20020 June 2019
FRN - Exemption for HDI to Use Oyster Creek Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund Re Request for License Transfer from Exelon
Project stage: Other
ML19177A0802019-06-26026 June 2019
Nuclear Generating Plant (CR-3) - Notification of Revised Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (Revised PSDAR)
Project stage: Request
ML19210E4702019-07-29029 July 2019
Transmittal of Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Direct and Indirect License Transfers, RAI-PFPB-1 and - 2
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML19247B4312019-09-0303 September 2019
Application of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for a Stay of the Effectiveness of the NRC Staff Actions Approving the License Transfer Application and Request for an Exemption to Use the Decommissioning Trust Fund for Non-Decommissioning
Project stage: Request
ML19329C9922019-11-21021 November 2019
LTR-19-0459 Senator Charles Schumer, Et Al., Letter to Holtec Regarding Oversight of the Decommissioning Process and the Potential Transfer of Indian Points Nuclear Regulatory Commission License from Entergy Corporation to Holtec Internatio
Project stage: Request
NL-19-084, Application for Order Consenting to Transfers of Control of Licenses and Approving Conforming License Amendments2019-11-21021 November 2019
Application for Order Consenting to Transfers of Control of Licenses and Approving Conforming License Amendments
Project stage: Request
ML19329B3242019-11-25025 November 2019
Watch Motion to Supplement Its February 20, 2019 Motion to Intervene and Request for Hearing, Its April 1, 2019 Reply to Petitioners, and Its May 3, 2019 Motion to Supplement
Project stage: Request
DCL-19-082, Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate2019-12-0404 December 2019
Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Project stage: Request
ML19343C6922019-12-0909 December 2019
Applicants Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watchs Third Motion to Supplement Its Motion to Intervene and Request for Hearing
Project stage: Request
ML19347D4152019-12-13013 December 2019
Motion of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to Amend Its Petition with New Information
Project stage: Request
ML19354A6982019-12-19019 December 2019
Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Including Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2, and 3
Project stage: Request
ML20003E1522020-01-0303 January 2020
Acceptance Review Determination (E-mail Dated 1/3/19) Entergy-Holtec License Transfer Application
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML20007E9182020-01-0707 January 2020
Applicants Answer Opposing the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Second Motion to Supplement Its Petition with New Information
Project stage: Request
ML20006E0442020-01-14014 January 2020
Notice of Consideration of Approval of Transfers of Renewed Facility Operating Licenses and Conforming Amendments, and Opportunity for a Hearing
Project stage: Other
ML20006E1222020-01-15015 January 2020
Individual Federal Register Notice for Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
Project stage: Request
ML20017A2902020-01-17017 January 2020
Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfers of Control of Licenses and Approving Conforming License Amendments
Project stage: Supplement
ML20023B3292020-01-21021 January 2020
LTR-20-0019 Senator Charles Schumer, Et Al., Letter Request for NRC to Extend the Public Comment Period for the License Transfer for Indian Point
Project stage: Request
ML20043F2732020-02-0505 February 2020, 10 February 2020, 12 February 2020
New York State Petition for Leave to Intervene and for Hearing with Supporting Declarations
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1232020-02-0505 February 2020
Declaration of George W. Heitzman in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20026A0022020-02-10010 February 2020
Proposed Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report and Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Project stage: Other
ML20043E1252020-02-10010 February 2020
Declaration of Alyse L. Peterson in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20024F0632020-02-11011 February 2020
Extension of Comment Period for Notice of Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments and Opportunity for a Hearing
Project stage: Other
ML20026A0012020-02-11011 February 2020
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML20043E1212020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Warren K. Brewer in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1222020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Daniel J. Evans in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20043F5302020-02-12012 February 2020
Petition of Riverkeeper, Inc. to Intervene and for a Hearing
Project stage: Request
ML20043F0542020-02-12012 February 2020
Petition by the Town of Cortlandt, Village of Buchanan, and Hendrick Hudson School Districts for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1282020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Chiara Trabucchi in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1262020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Timothy B. Rice in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20024F0532020-02-13013 February 2020
Extension of Comment Period Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
Project stage: Other
ML20056F0952020-02-13013 February 2020
Concerns Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1192020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Janelle Peotter on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1112020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Sarah Eggleston on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1172020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Daniel Lucas on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1182020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Dolores Jones on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3662020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Deborah Dougherty on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3762020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Mark Bierman on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3742020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Leigh Hill on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3702020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Jeanne Casatelli on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3672020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Dennis Phayre on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3562020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Vincent Ferri on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
2019-06-20
[Table View] |
Text
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: 3/6/20 8:50 AM Received: February 29, 2020 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No. 1k4-9fag-pu2f Comments Due: March 25, 2020 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2020-0021 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Transfer of Control of Licenses and Approval of Conforming License Amendments Comment On: NRC-2020-0021-0002 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 1, 2, and 3; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments Document: NRC-2020-0021-DRAFT-0191 Comment on FR Doc # 2020-03258 Submitter Information Name: Michael Green Address:
139 W 19 St New York, 10011 Email: green4141@gmail.com General Comment Hearing.Docket@nrc.gov Docket ID NRC-2020-0021 - opposing Indian Point license transfer to Holtec To the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff:
I begin by noting that over 20 million people live in the New York metropolitan area. In case of any accident, there is no way to evacuate or protect these people. If there is news of an accident, even a minor accident, the result could be mass panic, with the consequences that entails. The decommissioning of Indian Point requires critical care and maximum competence. Even minor errors are likely to create casualties, and cost in the billions of dollars. With this as background, Holtec as licensee for the decommissioning of Indian Point is likely to be catastrophic, for the following reasons:
Holtec and its subsidiaries are not qualified to hold the licenses of the Indian Point Energy Center. Given its record, area residents have no confidence in Holtec and do not accept it as the licensee. The Commission must not approve the license transfer, for the same reasons. Holtec's multiple problems disqualify it from decommissioning Indian Point.
Holtec lacks the experience needed to decommission Indian Point safely. Its entire nuclear "fleet" was acquired less than a year ago. It has never decommissioned a nuclear plant before; its first decommissioning job is Oyster Creek, which it acquired in July 2019. It is in effect learning on the job. The bulk of its Page 1 of 2 03/06/2020 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064843cac9a&format=xml&showorig=false
experience is in spent fuel handling, where its performance has been poor.
Holtec and its subsidiaries are privately held and their finances are opaque. Their business model is based on maximally leveraging the decommissioning trust fund and taxpayer moneys for their profit. But they haven't demonstrated sufficient capitalization to complete decommissioning, especially if decommissioning costs exceed their unreliably low estimates.
New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a petition to challenge license transfer to Holtec, stating "Putting the decommissioning of Indian Point in the hands of a company with no experience and uncertain financial resources is very risky." Many elected officials in New York support the AG's filing and share her objections to Holtec.
In its premature Post-Shutdown Activities Report (PSDAR), improperly filed with the NRC as if it were already the licensee, Holtec significantly underestimated the cost to decommission Indian Point. In fact, there is no site characterization assessing current conditions on which to base an estimate. The PSDAR ignored the Algonquin Pipeline passing near Indian Point's critical components, even though its presence greatly complicates decommissioning and raises risks of ruptures and fires. Holtec acknowledged in the PSDAR that there was radioactive contamination of groundwater at the site, which is also leaking into the Hudson River.
But it stated it planned to do nothing to remediate it, and will only monitor it. Nor does it plan to remediate contaminated soil any deeper than three feet. The PSDAR also stated Holtec is considering shipping large radioactive components by barge down the Hudson, which raises a host of additional unacceptable risks.
If Holtec ships radioactive waste to its own (via corporate linkage) sites (e.g., in New Mexico), it will cause major public protest concerning the shipping.
Holtec and SNC-Lavalin, the two companies behind the proposed Indian Point decommissioning contractors, are embroiled in numerous scandals and controversies that tell against their claims of high standards in ethics, compliance, financially sustainable business practices and trusted stewardship of nuclear materials. Their actual record is full of corruption, bribery, fraud, pleading guilty to and paying fines for malfeasance, getting barred from doing business with the TVA and the World Bank, and misleading and lying to officials and the public.
Holtec has demonstrated dangerous incompetence in its spent fuel handling at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. It put costs ahead of safety when it hired unqualified, low-skilled workers at Oyster Creek and has repeatedly exhibited a pattern of disregard for public concern or input.
It's vital that Indian Point's licensee be competent and trustworthy, free of the kind of serial malfeasance Holtec has committed, with a solid track record demonstrating it is well equipped to decommission Indian Point safely and responsibly. The Commission therefore has an obligation, statutory and otherwise, to clear the way for such a qualified candidate and reject Holtec as the licensee entrusted to decommission Indian Point. The considerations in the first paragraph above suggest that any risk is dangerous; taking the unnecessary risk of allowing a company with a poor record is tempting fate, and much too likely to have catastrophic consequences.
Sincerely, Michael E Green New York NY 10011 Page 2 of 2 03/06/2020 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=09000064843cac9a&format=xml&showorig=false
