Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, ... further results|Request]]
- Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: ML19112A318, ML20006E044, ML20024F053, ML20024F063, ML20026A002, ML20091J918, ML20091J919, ML20091L448, ML20092G718, ML20297A321, ML20297A325, ML20297A360, ML20309A853, ML20316A008, ML20318A379, ML21126A008, ML21126A013, ML21147A553
|
MONTHYEARML18066A0442018-03-0202 March 2018
March 2, 2018 Vermont Yankee Settlement Agreement
Project stage: Request
ML18066A7352018-03-0202 March 2018
Settlement Agreement Between Entergy, Northstar, State of Vermont Agencies, and Others Related to the Proposed Purchase and Sale of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Station (License DPR-28, Docket No. 50-271)
Project stage: Request
3F0618-02, Site Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate2018-06-27027 June 2018
Site Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Project stage: Request
ML18156A1792018-08-15015 August 2018
Issuance of Amendment to Change the Permanently Defueled
Project stage: Request
BVY 18-033, Registration of Spent Fuel Cask Use and Notification of Permanent Removal of All Spent Fuel Assemblies from the Spent Fuel Pool2018-08-16016 August 2018
Registration of Spent Fuel Cask Use and Notification of Permanent Removal of All Spent Fuel Assemblies from the Spent Fuel Pool
Project stage: Request
ML18242A6392018-10-11011 October 2018
Safety Evaluation of License Transfer Request (License DPR-28, Docket Nos. 50-271 and 72-59
Project stage: Request
ML19077A2322019-03-18018 March 2019
Applicants Answer Opposing the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request
Project stage: Request
ML19091A1892019-04-0101 April 2019
Watch Reply to Applicants Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Petition for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request
Project stage: Request
ML19116A1622019-04-26026 April 2019
Watch Motion to Supplement Its Motion to Intervene and Request for Hearing. New Information
Project stage: Request
ML19112A3182019-06-20020 June 2019
FRN - Exemption for HDI to Use Oyster Creek Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund Re Request for License Transfer from Exelon
Project stage: Other
ML19177A0802019-06-26026 June 2019
Nuclear Generating Plant (CR-3) - Notification of Revised Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (Revised PSDAR)
Project stage: Request
ML19210E4702019-07-29029 July 2019
Transmittal of Response to NRC Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Direct and Indirect License Transfers, RAI-PFPB-1 and - 2
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML19247B4312019-09-0303 September 2019
Application of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for a Stay of the Effectiveness of the NRC Staff Actions Approving the License Transfer Application and Request for an Exemption to Use the Decommissioning Trust Fund for Non-Decommissioning
Project stage: Request
ML19329C9922019-11-21021 November 2019
LTR-19-0459 Senator Charles Schumer, Et Al., Letter to Holtec Regarding Oversight of the Decommissioning Process and the Potential Transfer of Indian Points Nuclear Regulatory Commission License from Entergy Corporation to Holtec Internatio
Project stage: Request
NL-19-084, Application for Order Consenting to Transfers of Control of Licenses and Approving Conforming License Amendments2019-11-21021 November 2019
Application for Order Consenting to Transfers of Control of Licenses and Approving Conforming License Amendments
Project stage: Request
ML19329B3242019-11-25025 November 2019
Watch Motion to Supplement Its February 20, 2019 Motion to Intervene and Request for Hearing, Its April 1, 2019 Reply to Petitioners, and Its May 3, 2019 Motion to Supplement
Project stage: Request
DCL-19-082, Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate2019-12-0404 December 2019
Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Project stage: Request
ML19343C6922019-12-0909 December 2019
Applicants Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watchs Third Motion to Supplement Its Motion to Intervene and Request for Hearing
Project stage: Request
ML19347D4152019-12-13013 December 2019
Motion of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to Amend Its Petition with New Information
Project stage: Request
ML19354A6982019-12-19019 December 2019
Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Including Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 1, 2, and 3
Project stage: Request
ML20003E1522020-01-0303 January 2020
Acceptance Review Determination (E-mail Dated 1/3/19) Entergy-Holtec License Transfer Application
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML20007E9182020-01-0707 January 2020
Applicants Answer Opposing the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Second Motion to Supplement Its Petition with New Information
Project stage: Request
ML20006E0442020-01-14014 January 2020
Notice of Consideration of Approval of Transfers of Renewed Facility Operating Licenses and Conforming Amendments, and Opportunity for a Hearing
Project stage: Other
ML20006E1222020-01-15015 January 2020
Individual Federal Register Notice for Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
Project stage: Request
ML20017A2902020-01-17017 January 2020
Supplement to Application for Order Consenting to Transfers of Control of Licenses and Approving Conforming License Amendments
Project stage: Supplement
ML20023B3292020-01-21021 January 2020
LTR-20-0019 Senator Charles Schumer, Et Al., Letter Request for NRC to Extend the Public Comment Period for the License Transfer for Indian Point
Project stage: Request
ML20043F2732020-02-0505 February 2020, 10 February 2020, 12 February 2020
New York State Petition for Leave to Intervene and for Hearing with Supporting Declarations
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1232020-02-0505 February 2020
Declaration of George W. Heitzman in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20026A0022020-02-10010 February 2020
Proposed Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report and Site-Specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Project stage: Other
ML20043E1252020-02-10010 February 2020
Declaration of Alyse L. Peterson in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20024F0632020-02-11011 February 2020
Extension of Comment Period for Notice of Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments and Opportunity for a Hearing
Project stage: Other
ML20026A0012020-02-11011 February 2020
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML20043E1212020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Warren K. Brewer in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1222020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Daniel J. Evans in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20043F5302020-02-12012 February 2020
Petition of Riverkeeper, Inc. to Intervene and for a Hearing
Project stage: Request
ML20043F0542020-02-12012 February 2020
Petition by the Town of Cortlandt, Village of Buchanan, and Hendrick Hudson School Districts for Leave to Intervene and Hearing Request
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1282020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Chiara Trabucchi in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20043E1262020-02-12012 February 2020
Declaration of Timothy B. Rice in Support of New York Petition
Project stage: Request
ML20024F0532020-02-13013 February 2020
Extension of Comment Period Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments
Project stage: Other
ML20056F0952020-02-13013 February 2020
Concerns Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1192020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Janelle Peotter on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1112020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Sarah Eggleston on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1172020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Daniel Lucas on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20055G1182020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Dolores Jones on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3662020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Deborah Dougherty on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3762020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Mark Bierman on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3742020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Leigh Hill on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3702020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Jeanne Casatelli on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3672020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Dennis Phayre on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
ML20066H3562020-02-23023 February 2020
Comment from Vincent Ferri on the Indian Point Consideration of Approval of Transfer of Control of Licenses and Conforming Amendments (NRC-2020-0021)
Project stage: Request
2019-06-20
[Table View] |
Text
From:
Riverkeeper on behalf of Caryl Kottmann To:
Docket, Hearing
Subject:
[External_Sender] Docket ID NRC-2020-0021 - Reject Holtec"s PSDAR Date:
Sunday, February 23, 2020 1:45:15 PM Feb 23, 2020 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff
Dear:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff, I grew up in Peekskill and frequently visited many of the surrounding towns, especially Verplanck/Montrose/Buchanan. A love of the river and the river towns was deeply instilled in me by my parents. I have many wonderful childhood memories of sitting at the docks and banks of the majestic Hudson River with my family. Places like Steamboat dock, George's Island, and the Peekskill waterfront elicit happy and peaceful memories. I have family members who still live in Peekskill, and we continue to enjoy the river and surrounding towns to this day.
Everything possible should be done to ensure that the decommissioning of Indian Point is done with no impact to the environment, the river, and the residents. Safety and environmental integrity should be the prime focus. I am counting on you to reject Holtec's decommissioning plan.
The NRC should reject Holtec's PSDAR for Indian Point since a cursory overview shows that the Report fails to fulfill its basic objectives. A few of its main flaws are:
- 1. A full site characterization has not been completed, which immediately casts a doubt on the entire report. The site characterization provides the foundational information about the site's current situation, including the extent of any contamination, needed to determine what needs to be done to decommission the site. It is highly doubtful that Holtec can accurately gauge the cost of its activities when it does not know what needs to be done.
- 2. The PSDAR does not even mention the Algonquin Pipeline, a giant high-pressured gas pipeline only 105 feet from critical safety infrastructure at the Indian Point nuclear plant and next to two major earthquake fault lines. Without properly considering the pipeline, Holtec cannot begin to take the necessary precautions to minimize the risk of potential pipeline explosions during the decommissioning process.
- 3. Similarly, the activities that are included within the PSDAR are vague to the point of meaninglessness. For example, the Report mentions the possibility that large components will be removed by barge and then loaded on rail. However, there is no discussion of possible routes, when barging would be needed, safety precautions to prevent the release of radioactive materials or accidents during the barging process, or the environmental impacts of barging. The lack of information makes it impossible to figure out what Holtec intends, and as such, it is
unfathomable that accurate safety considerations and cost estimate was provided for this option.
- 4. Holtec's minimal effort is further highlighted by its method of choice to address the known radioactive groundwater contamination on-site, monitored natural attenuation -- essentially doing nothing.
Doing nothing about radioactive groundwater could lead to it flowing into the Hudson. To cut costs, Holtec also only proposes removing above ground structures to a depth of 3 feet and proposes abandoning the circulating water intake structures and discharge structure in place as one option. Simply leaving all the radioactive contamination and structures in place, Holtec is not proposing to fully restore the site for future uses.
- 5. Finally, the PSDAR cannot be clearer in showing Holtec's true intentions of draining the decommissioning trust fund. Though Indian Point Units 2 and 3 are functionally similar other than the size of their decommissioning fund, the PSDAR projects that decommissioning Unit 3 will cost almost $200 million more. The PSDAR also notes that Holtec anticipates that it will get exemptions to use the decommissioning fund for non-decommissioning purposes, such as spent fuel management and site restoration. This not only diverts funds away from its intended purpose, but also allows Holtec to pocket any reimbursement for spent fuel management it recovers later from the Department of Energy. In conjunction to draining the funds, Holtec limits its own risk if funding runs out through the use of limited liability subsidiaries with no assets, which would make it nearly impossible to collect shortfalls from Holtec.
Therefore, as outlined in the PSDAR, Holtec has everything to gain and nothing to lose, by shifting all risk onto the public.
Don't let this plan become reality. I urge you to reject this unacceptable PSDAR.
Sincerely, Caryl Kottmann 119 School House Ln Hopewell Junction, NY 12533-7446 kotts4@frontiernet.net
