ML20050B683

Evaluation of Ja Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant.

ML20050B683
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	12/31/1981
From:	INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS
To:
Shared Package
ML20050B682	List: ML20050B683
References
NUDOCS 8204070191
Download: ML20050B683 (36)

Text

8 f= ' - - - .

Evaluation Report

' December 1981

.E L FitzPatric< Nuclear Power Plant 3ower Aunoriy, S:a:e o" \ew York 0

l l-L 4

IN9,,

h$3 fb00DOCKO PDR ,

f 1.

'n a

)i L

m i

7 j EVALUATION n

,Lj f

] JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT i_

t 4 Power Authority of the State of New York

& 4 LJ e

to-4 J

d December 1981 bee l

1" w

9 L

M

j -

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 1 4

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

..)

-) The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) conducted its first evaluation of Power Authority of the State of New York's (PASNY) James A. FitzPatrick

] Nuclear Power Plant during the weeks of June 15 and June 22, 1981. FitzPatrick j consists of one 821-megawatt (electrical) General Electric boiling water reactor plant. It is located on the shore of Lake Ontario near Oswyc, New York. The

plant was placed in commercial operation in July 1975.

. PURPOSE AND SCOPE INPO conducted an evaluation of site activities to make an overall determination of plant operating safety, to evaluate management systems and controls, and to Identify areas needing improvement. Information was assembled from discus-sions, interviews, observations, and review of plant documents.

The INPO evaluation team examined station organization, training, gerations, maintenance, radiological and chemistry activities, and site technical support.

Corporate activities, except as an incidental part of the station evaluation, were not included in the scope of the evaluation. As a basis for the evaluation, INPO

. used its own experience on best practices within the industry and written evaluation criteria, which were furnished to the plant in advance. The evaluation standerds are high, and the findings and recommendations are not limited to minimt m safety concerns.

DETERMINATION Within the scope of this evaluation the team determined that the plant is being operated safely. The following favorable practices and accomplishments were noted:

The control room environment was quiet and businesslike, access control was effective, and shif t turnover was executed in a professional manner.

The execution of plant performance monitoring is resulting in improved efficiency in plant operations.

' The plant staff is enthusiastic and dedicated. Individuals at the supervisory level are highly qualified.

A good set of procedures has been developed to serve as a basis for the safe operation and administration of the plant.

The training facilities provide a good environment for trainee instruction.

66

- w

a j . .

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 2 Improvements were recommended for the following conditions:

~

There is a low level of experience and a low quality training program in the non-licensed operator area.

m l

Plant management needs to be more involved in inspection and evaluation of plant activities.

~

Administrative controls should be implemented to ensure tasks are per-formed in accordance with existing procedures.

The material conditions and cleanliness in several areas of the plant require significant upgrading.

Interdepartmental communications should be improved.

The program for industry operating experience review requires improve-ment.

Radiation exposure and contamination control practices require upgrading.

Specific evaluation findings and recommendations are contained in the accom-panying DETAILS, and information of an administrative nature is included in the ADMINISTRATIVE APPENDIX. These findings were presented at an exit meeting at the plant on June 26,1981.

Recommendations are intended to augment PASNY's efforts to achieve the highest possible standards in its nucler.r operations. Certain findings may reflect multiple deficiencies within a particular area. Therefore, in addressing these findings and recommendations. PASNY should look beyond correct'on of the specific deficiencies and address its corrective actions toward the underlying issues.

~

The findings and PASNY's responses were reviewed with PASNY management on November 19, 1981. PASNY responses are considered satisfactory. To follow the timely completion of these responses, INPO requests written notification

- when improvements are achieved on or before key target dates.

The evaluation team appreciates the excellent cooperation it received from all levels of the Power Authority of the State of New York. FitzPatrick station personnel were prompt and courteous in responding to requests.

.J

" E. P. Wilkinson i

.; President 4

~1 FITZPATRICK (1981)

- Paga 3 POWER AUTHORITY OF TIIE STATE OF NEW YORK ,

l

] Response Summary  !

n The Power Authority of the State of New York is firmly committed to the safe,

., reliable operation of its nuclear power plants. We are pleased to note that INPO's review of our operation found that that goal was being met.

INPO's recommendations form a valuable contribution to PASNY's long-term J effort to achieve a higher standard of excellence in nuclear plant operations.

Several of the recommended actions in the detailed report have already been implemented. The evaluation was most helpful to focus attention and priorities

. In the many areas of nuclear plant operations and in several cases confirmed courses of action previously planned by the Authority.

The Power Authority agrees with INPO's determination that increased attention must be paid to the issues of non-licensed operator training, implementation of certain administrative controls, and the increased involvement of plant manage-

! ment in the evaluation of certain plant evolutions. The planned addition to site

- support facilities similar to that accomplished at Indian Point 3 will significantly

~ ~

contribute to the staff's ability to efficiently run the plant. This will alleviate problems noted in the detailed report in such areas as storage, work facilities, equipment segregation, and contamination control.

The body of the report contains detailed responses to all recommendations made by INPO. The Authority intends in its response to provide remedial action which takes into account the underlying issues behind the recommendation. INPO will be provided with reports which document completion of the recommendalons by the dates specified in our response.

2 i

~.

9 ed s-1 ..

i

- FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 4 DETAILS

] This portion of the report includes the detailed findings- It is composed of six sections, one for each of the major evaluation areas. Each section is headed by 1 a summary describing the scope of the evaluation and the overall finding in that area. The summary is fc!! owed by the specific findings, recommendations, and utility responses related to each of INPO's evaluation procedures. Items relating to criteria that have not been included in INPO procedures but are generally j recognized as desirable, accepted techniques of industry and management are a listed as General Ctiteria. De evaluation procedures that were used are listed in the ADMINISTRATIVE APPENDIX.

ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION The overall management of the plant was evaluated from an administrative viewpoint. This encompassed an assessment of the existing directives and procedures, as well as their effectiveness. The administrative system is

> comprehensive, and a noteworthy set of procedures has been promulgated to guide plant personnel. In particular, the surveillance test procedures are well-

'~

written and effective in accomplishing necessary plant testing. The staff organization is functioning well, and a high level of dedication was evident throughout the evaluation. Ilowever, it was noted that management needs to be

, more involved in the details of day-to-day activities in the plant.

i OBJECTIVES (INPO Procedure OA-101, Revision 2)

The method of promulgating management objectives within the plant was examined, along with methods of promoting progress toward objectives and periodic assessment of progress. The objectives in use were examined to determine if they provide substantive guidance tc plant personnel and support higher level objectives.

Finding (Criterion E)

Periodic checks are not performed to determine timely attainment of goals and objectives.

- Recommendation j Develop a system to provide a periodic assessment of progress.

Response

Progress in meeting the plant mission statement and departmental objectives will be reviewed on a quartet ' basis.

' l.

,a 4

.. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE (INPO Procedure OA-102, Revision 2)

The administrative organization was exarr.ined to determine if it supports safe and efficient operation of the plant. Key areas examined included the reporting

=

__ -----a - _ - - _ - _ - - - - - - _ - - -

~

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Pga5 relationships for plant and on-site support personnel, position descriptions,

- performance evaluations, and workload distribution.

I Finding (Criterion B)

Although written position descriptions exist for most staff positions,

many do not reflect current position requirements.

.; Recommendation Update the position descriptions so they reflect requirements of each position.

Response

All existing exempt position descriptions have been reviewed and up-dated where so required to reflect the requirements for those positions.

New positions being established for exempt personnel are having the associated position descriptions written with the aid of headquarters personnel department specialists. Thirty new bargaining unit position descriptions are being negotiated with the respresentatives of the bargaining unit.

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS (INPO Procedure OA-103, Revision 2)

The station administrative procedures and controls were examined to determine

, if clearly defined controls are in effect and if adherence to these controls is maintained.

Finding (Criterion D)

Some administrative requirements, which would benefit plant operations, are not being executed. The personnel assigned these responsibilities are not being held accountable.

Recommendation Implement controls to ensure written requirements are being executed by the individuals assigned the responsibility.

Response

Emphasis on personal responsibility has been and is being increased. The plant staff has been directed to enforce administrative procedures.

a QUALITY PROGRAMS (INPO Procedure OA-104, Revision 5)

On-site quality programs were evaluated to determine if sufficient monitoring 3 and auditing capabilities exist to ensure safe and efficient accomplishment of j the plant mission.

Finding (Criterion A)

! Inspections and tours by management are infrequent. This has resulted

.; in degraded housekceping and material conditions in some areas of the

1 ..

.]

FITZPATRICK (1981)

- Pga6 i

plant. Further, a methodology has not been established to require

=

regular observations of the plant.

q Recommendation

'u; A system should be developed to ensure the regular involvement of management in all areas and aspects of plant operations.

Response

!, Management personnel are being required to increase the frequency of their inspections and to view important evolutions. The Fire Protection Specialist, a new staff member, is having a significant impact on

' ,I housekeeping deficiencies with his frequent inspections.

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY (INPO Procedure OA-106, Revision 3)

- The on-site industrial safety program was evaluated to determine if plant policies and practices provide a safe working environment for all personnel at the plant.

1. Finding (Criteria A and B)

Although an industrial safety program has been established, violations of accepted safety practices were apparent in several areas of the plant.

Recommendation Appropriate actions should be initiated to ensure approved industrial safety practices are being observed throughout the plant. This should include an improved technique for ensuring adherence to industrial safety practices.

> Response Increased emphasis is being placed on identifying safety problems by both departmental management and the plant safety insepetor. The j degree of adherence to industrial safety practices will be monitored closely by plant management.

i 2. Finding (Criterion D) l Work practices and safety considerations relating to caustic substance

and acid handling have not been promulgated formally.

1- Recommendation Procedures for the handling of caustic substances and acid should be

[ ; changed to include guidance for worker safety.

IL, Response The Operations Department procedure has been revised to include r- special emphasis on caustic acid safety precaution.

m 3

s-6, v-

FITZPATRICK (1981)

~

Pqe7 SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

- (INPO Procedure OA-107, Revision 3)

The surveillance program was evaluated to determine if appropriate surveillance inspection and testing are accomplished to ensure reliable system and equipment performance.

Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

I 1

PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS (INPO Procedure OA-108, Revision 2)

The team e" .?:mted the qualification requirements for job positions at the plant and the m a .s used to ensure all positions are filled with qualified personnel.

1. Finding (Criterion A)

Written qualification requirements, based on job analysis, do not exist for some staff positions. The existing qualification requirements are limited to the minimum NRC requirements for education and experience.

Recommendation Position descriptions should be revised to identify all appropriate qualifi-cation requirements for incumbents. Specific attributes, which should be delineated where appropriate, include educational level; technical skills; hands-on, supervisory or management experience; licenses; and skill certifications. The revised qualification requirements should then be used for selection and promotion of candidates and to guide training of individuals desiring promotion.

Response

Position descriptions are being reviewed and updated, where appropriate, in order to clearly specify qualification requirements. The elements of the above recommendation will be included in this action. The initial effort is scheduled for completion in July 1982. Subsequently, the qualification requirements will be used in the selection, training, and promotion of individuals.

2. Finding (Criterion B)

Some individuals are being assigned to plant staff positions prior to being

,' qualified to assume the associated responsibilities.

! Recommendation Establish controls to enforce qualification requirements.

i Response All departments will be required to document by memorandum that a

- person is qualified for upgrading to specific tasks.

L 1

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Pega 8

~

TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION 7

- Evaluations were conducted to determine the effectiveness of the training organization and administration, the sufficiency of training resources, and the t effectiveness of non-licensed operator, licensed operator, and shift technical J advisor training.

1 Areas of strength were found in the enthusiasm and dedication of the training staff and the excellent training environment. Weaknesses were noted in the area of non-licensed operator training.

TRAINING ORGANIZATION (INPO Procedure TQ-201, Revision 0)

An evaluation was performed to determine if a clearly defined training organi-zation exists that is staffed with qualified personnel and is capable of accom-plishing all assigned training tasks.

1. Finding (Criterion B)

The size of the training staff, the program scheduling, and the magnitude of instructor workload do not facilitate training program material

! development and modification. Instructor preparation is also inhibited

! by this situation.

Recommendation The period between training programs should be sufficient to enable the development and improvement of lesson plans and visual aids. Time should be set aside on a daily basis during program execution for instructor preparation for the following day. Additionally, time should be designated by the instructor for exam correction, or the function should be delegated to other staff members.

Response

- The training function will be critically examined to determine the human resources required to support necessary tasks. These resources will then be provided through a combination of purchased training services and additions to the training staff as appropriate. This will be completed by July 1982.

~

2. Finding (Criterion D)

A program does not exist to develop and maintain an optimum level of

.I instructor effectiveness.

Recommendation Utilize the needs analysis technique to identify instructional training p program content and, thereafter, provide the appropriate training.

Response

Needs of the training department are being established in instructor

. loading and instructor effectiveness. A program based on these surveys will be in effect by July 1982. The effectiveness of instructors will be assessed by headquarters and site training management personnel.

Instructvc skills will be developed and maintained by a combination of on-the-job training and off-site workshops.

l u

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Pags 9 TRAINING ADMINISTRN1' ION (INPO Procedure TQ-202, Revision 0)

! An evaluation was performed to determine if organization functions necessary to initiate and control personnel qualification programs are accomplished in a well- l 1 defined, coordinated, and effective manner. I I

1. Finding (Criterion C)

, instructor performance is not evaluated to measure the accomplishment of training program objectives and overall effectiveness of training programs.

Recommendation Instructor performance should be evaluated periodically to determine their effectiveness in meeting program objectives. Such evaluations should assess technical and instructional competence, student / instructor relationship and interaction, and post-training student performance.

Response

Criteria are under development for systematic evaluation of these attributes at the site and headquarters levels. Procedures for eval-uations have been developed.

2. Finding (Criterion E) l Trainee aptitudes, knowledge, and skills are not identified for use in developing training programs.

Recommendation Trainee prerequisites for program entry should be established and implemented. In conjunction, program content should be modified for the background, aptitudes, knowledge, and skills of the trainees.

Response

The Authority and bargaining unit representatives have opened nego-tlations in 1981 to install a system of selection testing to determine aptitudes for advancement to key positions by assignment to training programs. Program contents will be modified based on the abilities of the tested trainees.

l

3. Finding (General Criterion) i Training programs are not assessed periodically for the purpose of improvement. Consequently, program effectiveness is affected ad-

- versely.

Recommendation Implement training program evaluations that determine the appropriate-ness of material, quality and quantity of training aids, and effectiveness I of content. Such evaluations should include input from trainees, w functional supervisors, instructors, and the training supervisor. Conclu-sions should be incorporated as changes to the appropriate program areas.

M W

o FITZPATRICK (1981) r- Paga 10 l

tJ

Response

Beginning in 1982, a system for assessing the effectiveness of training j programs will be implemented. It will include pretesting and post-t- testing, evaluations initiated by trainees, and interviews with cognizant department heads or supervisors.

r.

T=J r

f i

TRAINING RESOURCES (INPO Procedure TQ-205, Revision 0)

An evaluation was performed to determine the adequacy of training facilities, equipment, and materials used for the delivery of high quality training for nuclear plant personnel.

~

Finding

, All criteria in this procedure were met.

t, y~

l LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-223, Revision 0)

An evaluation was performed to determine if an effective program exists to maintain a high level of knowledge and skill in individuals licensed as reactor or senior reactor operators.

Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

l SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-224, Revision 0)

An evaluation was performed to determine if the shift technical advisor (STA) has the qualifications necessary to enhance operational safety by providing effective technical assistance to the operating shift personnel during normal, abnormal, and emergency operating conditions.

Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

t ,

<y

FITZPATRICK (1981)

~ Paga 11 NON-LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-242, Revision 2)

L An evaluation was performed to determine if initial and continuing training for non-licensed operators is sufficient to ensure they are capable of performing fl their jobs safely and efficiently.

U Finding (Criterion A)

C Although a written non-licensed operator training program exists, the

$ program is neither consistently implemented nor effective in developing trainee knowledge and skills. An instructor has recently been added for

, the specific purpose of designing and implementing a new non-licensed operator training program.

Recommendation The non-licensed operator initial and continuing training programs should j

be established and implemented. The INPO " Nuclear Power Plant Non-Licensed Operators-Guidelines for Qualification Programs" (GPG-04) could be used for assistance in developing the program.

~

Response

One new-hire training specialist has been assigned principal responsibi-

'~

lity for the development and implementation of an effective training

., program for non-licensed operators. The program was implemented in July 1981.

The operations staff will more closely monitor the non-licensed program.

j The staff will make monthly reviews of qualification hours and give oral quizzes.

s i LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING (INPO Procedure TQ-243, Revision 2)

An evaluation was performed to determine if the training for licensed operator 3 candidates is adequate to permit them to operate the plant reliably and safely.

Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

b d

- - ~ ~ ~ -

^ '

FITZPATRICK (1981)

~

Paga 12 OPERATIONS

' I Operations activities were evaluated in the areas of organization and adminis-tration, tagout practices, conduct of shift operations, procedures, plant status controls, facilities and equipment, and shift turnover.

J The control room was operated in a professional and businesslike manner, the

' operating procedures were easy to read and understand, and the knowledge level of the licensed personnel was impressive. It was equally evident that a lack of knowledge and experience existed at the non-licensed operator level.

OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION (INPO Procedure OP-301, Revision 3)

, s An evaluation was performed to determine the existence of a clearly defined operations organization that provides for the assignment of responsibilities and the delegation of adequate authority for accomplishment of required tasks.

Areas reviewed included organization structure, job descriptions, shift adminis-trative assignments, written and oral instructions and orders, and miscellaneous administrative programs.

Finding (Criterion E)

Informal drawings, sketches, instructions, and information are posted throughout the plant.

Recommendation Develop and implement a policy to prevent the use of informal drawings, sketches, instructions, and information. This policy should include a mechanism to ensure a review for updating or removing temporary instructions.

Response

A memo has been written that prohibits posting of non-approved

- material. Informal material has been removed by the Operations Superintendent. A plant standing order will be issued by December 1981 implementing the above recommendation.

TAGOUT PRACTICES (INPO Procedure OP-302, Revision 2)

, .. J An evaluation was performed to determine if established tagout practices ensure l

protection for personnel and station equipment. Areas reviewed included senior reactor operator (SRO) approval of safety-related tagouts, double verification of tagged equipment for personnel safety, double verification of important manual i valves that are repositioned during testing, tag coloring and numbering, and review of clearance logs.

Finding (Criterion G)

No periodic review and audit of plant clearances is conducted.

I 6.

O FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 13 Recommendation A system to periodically audit all active clearances should be estab-

lished. This system should include verification of tag attachments and the component lineup status to ensure that desired safety conditions are maintained.

I Response

A semi-annual audit of tags has been established in Work Activity Control Procedure 10.1.2.

CONDUCT OF SHIFT OPERATIONS (INPO Procedure OP-303, Revision 3)

An evalutation was performed to determine how effectively the conduct of shift operations maintains quality shift performance. Areas reviewed included oper-ator activities, station cleanliness and order, response to abnormal conditions, logkeeping practices, reliability of control room instrumentation, and operator awareness of plant conditions.

Finding (Criterion C)

Numerous alarms and indicators throughout the plant have missing or burned-out lights, thus reducing the reliability of the alarm system.

Recommendation

, Operators should be instructed to identify and replace missing or burned-out lights and indicators when they are tested. Sup rvisors should periodically ensure this practice is continued.

Response

Operators and technicians have been instructed to identify and replace missing or burned-out lights and indicators. Supervisors will monitor the condition of alarms and indicators on a periodic basis.

USE OF PROCEDURES (INPO Procedure OP-304, Revision 2)

An evalundon was performed to determine proper use of procedures to conduct plant operations safely and reliably. Areas reviewed included management i policy for use of and change of procedures (short-term and long-term). In addition, procedures were reviewed for clarity, continuity, identification of

" sequence-required" actions, and suitable advisory information.

l ~" Finding (Criterion B) l_ As recognized by the plant, an excessive number of emergency proce-dures exist, thereby overburdening the operator's requirement to memo-rize the immediate actions.

Recommendation l Continue with the present review and revision program to ensure emergency procedures contain only industry-recognized emergencies.

FITZPATRICK (1981)

~ Paga 14 II Verify that emergency response procedure immediate action steps in- l clude only those actions that must be taken to adequately control the ,

P. emergency until written procedures can be obtained. '

<! Response ,

Rev;sions for this program have been completed, are being approved by q management, and are expected to be completed about March 1982.

d 9%

PLANT STATUS CONTROIE

'f (INPO Procedure OP-305, Revision 2)

't An evaluation was performed to determine that plant status controls are

.p provided to ensure adequate equipment and system availability. Areas reviewed

[~; included management programs and policies that provide guidance for status control; actual practices in status control; responsibilities of senior licensed operators assigned to monitor and review status control; and provisions for status

! control under special conditions such as outages, accident recovery, or refueling.

a Finding All criteria of this procedure were met.

L OPERATIONS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT (INPO Procedure OP-300, Revision 2)

L.

An evaluation was performed to determine if plant facilities and equipment are

i ~ operable and if they are maintained in a manner that ensures safe and efficient

,a operation. Areas reviewed included equipment operability, equipment avail-ability programs, effect of the working environment on safe and efficient station operation, adequacy of communication equipment, and shift station assignments.

Finding (Criterion B)

Non-licensed operators are not conducting comprehensive tours of the plant. They are not provided with a log sheet or similar guidance to assist in the efficient and effective monitoring of plant status.

Recommendation Establish a program to provide specific guidance to operating personnel making rounds and checking equipment.

Response

-, A comprehensive shift tour and turnover sheet will be in place by December 1981.

• ^

FITZPA'n' RICK (1981)

Page 15 l '

SHIFT TURNOVER (INPO Procedure OP-307, Revision 1)

.; An evaluation was performed to determine if continuous and correct under-standing of station conditions is maintained at all shift positions. Areas reviewed included programs and policies controlling shift turnover practices for

~

shift stations, checklists, operating panel reviews, and station activities in progress or planned.

Finding (Criterion B)

Each operating shift station is not provided with an independent check-sheet to guide the turnover process. There is no turnover checksheet for the non-licensed operators. A common turnover checksheet is used by the shift supervisors and the control room operators.

Recommendation -

Develop and implement a turnover checksheet for individual shift stations.

Response

A comprehensive shift tour and turnover sheet was incorporated in October 1981.

e E

.a w

FITZPATRICK (1981) o Paga 16 MAINTENANCE I The evaluation encompassed the maintenance organization, preventive mainte-nance program, wo6k control system, maintenance history, control and cali-

! bration of testing equipment, procedures, and facilities and equipment.

The Maintenance and Instrumentation and Control (I&C) departments are staffed a with enthusiastic personnel who take pride in their work and their plant. An area of weakness in the Maintenance Department is the need for improved procedures to ensure proper execution of maintenance activities.

i MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION (INPO Procedure MA-401, Revision 2)

The maintenance organization and administrative programs were evaluated.

Areas reviewed included the organization structure, staff size, assignment of authorities and responsibilities, training, and certain administrative programs.

Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (INPO Procedure MA-402, Revision 2) l The team evaluated the effectiveness of maintenance in optimizing equipment reliability and performance. The preventive maintenance (PM) program was assessed to determine if it was well-defined and effectively implemented. Other areas of review included criteria used to determine the equipment to be included in the program, frequency of maintenance, effectiveness of program control, and coordination and adequacy of individual procedures.

1. Finding (Criterion B)

Some plant equipment evidences a need for preventive maintenance.

Although FitzPatrick procedure 10.2 assigns specific responsibilities for the execution of the PM program, many of these requirements are not being followed.

, Recommendation u Ensure the proper and effective implementation of the PM program.

l Response n Safety-related equipment has been given the highest preventive mainte-nance priority. Assets presently limit the staff from conducting a complete preventive maintenance program. Additional personnel have

, been and are being hired. It is expected that a substantial increase in preventive maintenance will occur by July 1982.

, 2. Finding (Criterion C) l _.

A number of major plant components, such as the condensate pumps and the booster pumps, are not listed in the PM program. The procedure for

.s

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 17 the PM program does not include specific criteria for determining the plant equipment and instrumentation that should be included in the program.

Recommendation Upgrade the PM program to include the specific criteria for determining the plant equipment that should be placed in the program.

Response

The administrative procedure for preventive maintenance is being re-vised. It will consider several finite factors in the site's evaluation of utilizing a routine maintenance program for plant equipment and components. These parameters include, but are not limited to, the following:

effect on overall operation (including safe shutdown capability) radiation exposure due to added maintenance industrial safety potential total man-hour complement ability to monitor performance with installed instrumentation frequency and types of previous failures and maintenances

3. Finding (Criterion H)

Some plant equipment shows a need for lubrication; a definitive program for equipment lubrication does not exist.

Recommendation Define and implement a plant lubrication program.

Response

A plant lubrication program will be implemented prior to startup from the fall 1981 refueling and maintenance outage.

MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES (INPO Procedure MA-403, Revision 3)

The team evaluated the degree to which procedures enhance the quality and effectiveness of maintenance activities. Procedures and manuals were examined to determine the types of maintenance covered, scope, level of detail, review and approval process, document control requirements, and methods of revision.

Finding

. All criteria in this procedure were met.

l WORK CONTROL SYSTEM (INPO Procedure MA-404, Revision 3)

The effectiveness of the work control system was evaluated. The system functions were checked to see if they promote adequate identification of i

FITZPATRICK (1981) 7 Page 18 potential work; define and authorize work to be performed by the maintenance

,, groups; provide for planning, scheduling, and control of actual work; and have a

! mechanism to input the maintenance results into an equipment history file for J future evaluation.

n Finding (Criterion A) a An evaluation of plant material conditions identified deficiencies that had yet to be documented by a maintenance request. In addition, some identified plant deficiencies are not being repaired or corrected in a timely manner.

Recommendation Upgrade the techniques by which management identifies deficiencies throughout the plant. Provide an improved system of maintenance request management that will ensure timely completion of pending

maintenance..

Response

Personnel have been made aware of the importance of using Occurrence Reports to initiate work requests. Work requests have been and are now g being actively reviewed for priority. Every effort will be made to issue l work requests on deficiencies found during the present outage and reduce the backlog of maintenance to a minimum number prior to startup.

l:

! MAINTENANCE HISTORY (INPO Procedure MA-405, Revision 3)

The ability of maintenance history records to support maintenance evaluations J was reviewed. Areas covered included the equipment included in maintenance i

history, content and accessibility of records, history review and evaluation L methods, implementation of an equipment performance program, and procedures for program implementation.

Finding (Criterion A)

Although a considerable data bank has been accumulated for mainte-nance history, desired information cannot be extracted readily. This situation results, in part, from the lack of a definitive procedure for maintenance history management.

- Recommendation Implement a procedure or guideline defining the purpose, method, and responsibility for a maintenance history program. The result of this action should be a maintenance history that allows information to be extracted readily for analysis in upgrading plant material conditions.

l i Response A more definite program will be established. It is expected that, because of tne large data bank, it will take until December 1982 to fully establish the program.

4 M

FITZPATRICK (1981)

' Paga 19

]

CONTROL AND CALIBRATION OF TEST EQUPMENT AND

- INSTRUMENTATION (INPO Procedure MA-406, Revision 1)

The team evaluated the adequacy and effectiveness of methods used for calibration and control of test equipment and instrumentation. Specifically, 2 methods used for identifying, calibrating, storing, issuing, transporting, and using measuring and test equipment were examined. Procedures establishing and governing the calibration program and existing calibration records were also reviewed.

1. Finding (Criterion D)

Measuring and test equipment that fails to meet applicable specifi-cations is not always affixed with a tag showing rejection information such as date and reason for rejection.

Recommendation Equipment that fails to meet specifications should be tagged imme-diately with a rejection tag. This tag should contain information such as date and reason for rejection. m

Response

Action has been taken to reinforce and familiarize employees with these procedures.

2. Finding (Criterion E)

Controlled measuring and test equipment (M&TE) is not separated from non-controlled equipment in the I&C shops.

Recommendation Provide segregated storage.

Response

The Instrumentation and Control Department has secured additional plant storage space for controlled and non-controlled M&TE. This problem will not be fully corrected, however, until the new support facility is built. It is expected that this facility will be complete sometime in 1983.

MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT (INPO Procedure MA-408, Revision 2) i The location, size, and condition of offices, work, and storage spaces were examined. In addition, the number, type, condition, and location of maintenance r tools and equipment were reviewed.

1. Finding (Criterion A)

Several aspects of the plant facilities do not promote efficient execution of ongoing work. Plans have been initiated to alleviate this situation by constructing additional buildings. Two areas presented obvious problems:

f a. Both the warehouse and storeroom evidence a need for increased

- space in which to properly store material.

!M

J FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 20

b. Office conditions for supervisors are crowded, and space for

-, meetings and instructional sessions is limited.  !

Recommendation l 4

Efforts should continue to complete the facility expansion on a priority )

basis.

Response

,J The problem will be resolved when the new support facility is completed in 1983.

. .)

2. Finding (Criterion C)

- - The main maintenance shop, main instrument shop, and hot I&C shop are

not maintained in a clean and organized manner.

Recommendation Upgrade the storage and housekeeping in the maintenance shops.

~'

Response

- In order to improve the organization and cleanliness, weekly assignments are being made for daily cleanup, and space is being secured for components awaiting repair.

9 4

• 4

• 4

-4

-4,e 4

-d WM L

w

. m l-l l

1 FITZPATRICK (1981) 1 Paga 21 I

RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY

~~

The evaluation of Radiation Protection and Chemistry included radiological protection training, personnel dosimetry, external and internal radiation expo-sure, radioactive contamination control, and chemistry. The magnitude of plant

]

.; modifications during this evaluation resulted in work conditions other than routine.

On a positive note, there are some experienced personnel on the Radiation Protection and Chemistry staff. In addition, several of the contract health physics technicians also have considerable experience at the plant.

- A number af significant problem areas were identified including inadequate personnel monitoring for radioactive contamination, inadequate monitoring of 9 normally uncontaminated systems, and the lack of a program to reduce radiation exposures.

RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION (INPO Procedure RC-501, Revision 1)

An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the management of the radiation protectin program and to determine if plant staff members have the knowledge and practical abilities necessary to effectively implement radiation protection practices associated with their work.

Finding (Criterion D)

The majority of the radiological and environmental services technician training is on-the-job training with no control features, such as check-lists or guidelines, and a minimum of classroom training. During the evaluation, discussions with personnel and observations identified weak-nesses in technician level of knowledge and job performance. Some training weaknesses have been identified, and a training program revision

~

is under development.

Recommendation A formal training program should be established and implemented. In addition, the majority of the present technicians should receive refresher training in such basic areas as frisking, controlling contamination, and evaluating plant conditions and jobs for potential exposure reduction.

Response

'l The following implementations have been or will be made to enhance the

,. technical training program.

, a. The position of Radiological and Environmental Training and Quality Control Supervisor has now been filled.

b. The training program for Radiological and Environmental Services Technicians has been written.

c. The program is being implemented and implementation should be completed by March 1982.

W

FITZPATRICK (1981)

--- Paga 22 PERSONNEL DOSIMETRY (INPO Procedure RC-503, Revision 1) 1 An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the plant's dosimetry program in measuring, evaluating, and recording occupational radiation exposures.

]

~

Finding

- All criteria in this procedure were met.

~

RADIATION SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL (INPO Procedure RC-504, Revision 2)

An evaluation was performed to determine if the plant was minimizing the

~

- contamination of equipment, areas of the plant, and personnel.

1. Finding (Criterion C)

Contamination is not being controlled at the source in several areas of the plant. The following are examples:

~

a. leaking instruments, pumps, and valves

b. highly contaminated areas not always segregated from areas of lower contamination

c. poor housekeeping

• Recommendation Identify and eliminate the sources of contamination by training personnel to be attentive to causes such as leaks and poor work practices.

Encourage people to turn in work requests, requests for decontamination, and reports of poor work practices. These actions should then be reviewed to determine where emphasis is needed. FitzPatrick Standing Order Number 8, Routine Plant Patrols, could provide one vehicle for

~

identifying such problems. Contamination can be partially controlled througn the selected use of drip pans or cofferdams; however, these methods should not be substituted for corrective maintenance.

- Response The plant is giving additional attention to repairing leaks promptly.

llousekeeping is being emphasized in contaminated areas, with excessive debris and dispersed articles of protective clothing being eliminated.

Glove boxes, tents, and small portable air equipment with filters will be used more frequently.

2. Finding (General Criterion)

Personnel contamination monitoring practices need upgrading.

W

_____m._.

FITZPATRICK (1981)

] Page 23 Recommendation It is recognized that the plant is considering purchasing state-of-the-art

! portal monitors, and this action should be continued. The frisking

~

program should be improved by requiring workers to frisk properly and by providing strict controls at the exits from the plant, particularly at those D exits that are essentially uncontrolled such as the screen house and

J diesel generator building.

Response

q Personnel are now periodically stationed at frisking areas to monitor i>

~'

compliance and instruct workers in frisking procedures. Frisking in-structions are posted. Portal monitors are being purchased.

'i ,

i

.. WASTE A.wD DISCHARGE CONTROL (INPO Procedure RC-505, Revision 2)

An evaluation was performed to determine if radioactive effluents and solid radioactive waste volumes were being minimized.

1. Finding (Criterion D)

Normally uncontaminated systems are inadequately monitored. Below are several examples of systems where contamination problems or potential problems were identified:

a. The heat exchanger used to heat water for regeneration of the make-up demineralizer was found to be contaminated. This equipment was outside the radiation controiled areas.

b. The auxiliary steam system, which was known to be extensively contaminated, was not adequately posted.

c. The demineralized water system was recognized as having a high

, potential for cross contamination, yet only one header in this i,

system is monitored routinely.

Recommendation The plant should institute a program to identify those systems that have I

the potential for becoming contaminated. These systems should be H periodically checked by surveying and/or sampling at indicator points

!, (such as traps and heat exchangers) where contamination would be l' expected. If those indicator points show contamination, more surveys or

[' samples should be performed. Examples of systems that are suspect i

include service air if used to blow filter precoats, steam and condensate associated with the auxiliary boilers, and systems that may be isolated l: from contaminated systems by r. single check valve such as the deminer-

[~ alized water system when it is in service to the condensate storage tank.

1- Response A program is being implemented to routinely sample systems that have been designated as clean and to analyze for evidence of contamination.

Clean area surveys are being conducted to monitor equipment in uncontrolled areas which are normally expected to be clean.

F i

~

FITZPATRICK (1981)

-. Paga 24

2. Finding (General Criterion)

Large volumes of certain types of solid radioactive waste are accumu-

~1 lating because the development of a satisfactory procedure for proces-sing the waste has not been completed. Specific examples include oily wastes, control rod drive (CRD) suction filters, and used condenser

- tubes, which are stored outside in detericrating boxes.

Recommendation The program for radwaste management should classify waste materials; provide a mechanism for minimizing waste generation; ar,d specify how different waste is to be treated, packaged, and shipped. Because of stringent burial ground requirements, particular attention should be given to oily, unsolidified, and certain chemical wastes. Further, policies and procedures should be established for the reclaiming and disposition of material that has been decontaminated. In particular, this applies to metal decontaminated by electropolishing.

Response

The majority of oily contaminated waste containers and the CRD filters have been processed and shipped from the site. Radwaste management is being enhanced by establishing a separate operational group to specifically handle this problem area. Formal training for this section commenced in November 1981.

i

3. Finding (General Criterion)

The generation of liquid radioactive waste is not being minimized.

Examples are as follows:

a. leaking valves in the radwaste area

b. numerous steam leaks

c. general discussions indicating that overflowing of tanks and sumps is a common problem l d. semi-annual effluent discharge reports for 1980 indicating a high

! generation of liquid waste Recommendation The plant should establish an effective program to monitor and control liquid radioactive waste generation. Guidelines should be established that, through trend analysis, will result in a significant reduction in liquid waste. Frequent tank level readings could aid in this effort.

Response

,; The Radwaste foreman is monitoring the sump inputs weekly to deter-

, mine if input is increasing. Causes ate being researched and repair requests initiated. Steam leaks are required when systems are made l., avrilable for shutdown or are temporarily repaired, using a propristary compound, if possible. A new section dedicated to radwaste manage-w ment has been hired and will be placed on shift when trained.

m .

6,e W

~

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 25 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEY EQUIPMENT CONTROL AND CALIBRATION

- (INPO Procedure RC-506, Revision 2)

An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of tr.e plant's radiological survey equipment calibration and control program.

,j Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

PERSONNEL HEALTH PHYSICS INDOCTRINATION (INPO Procedure RC-507, Revision 2)

An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the plant's health physics (HP) indoctrination program. This area was evaluated by observing the training for personnel who do not enter radiologically controlled areas and by

reviewing plans and records for training of personnel who work in radiologically controlled areas.

Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

PROCESS WATER CONTROLS (INPO Procedure RC-508, Revision 2)

An evaluation was performed to determine if the plant was performing accurate 2

chemistry measurements and aggressively controlling chemistry parameters.

Finding All criteria in this procedure were met.

HEALTH PHYSICS FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT (INPO Procedure RC-509, Revision 2) i' The chemistry and health physics facilities were evaluated to determine if they

[, are adequate to support safe and efficient plant operation.

.'inding All criteria in this procedure were met.

6 5

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 26 RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM (INPO Procedure RC-511, Revision 2) i

"- An evaluation was performed to determine the effectiveness of the plant's respiratory protection program in protecting personnel from airborne radio-C activity. Areas reviewed included policy and procedures, control of airborne

,; radioactivity, respirator fit testing for personnel, and respiratory maintenance.

Finding i

All criteria in this procedure were met.

T11 a

RADIATION EXPOSURE REDUCTION GOALS (INPO Procedure RC-538, Revision 0)

- An evaluation was performed to determine if the plant was minimizing personnel radiation exposure.

t Finding (Criteria B and C)

Radiation exposure reduction goals are not established for the total collective personnel exposure or for specific jobs. Evaluations are not routinely performed to identify areas, outage and non-outage, where radiation exposures could be reduced. The following are situations that contribute to exposure accumulation:

l- a. the long-term storage of radioactive waste drums reading several hundred millirem / hour l'

( b. the high containination levels and general area radiation levels in the radioactive waste building m

Recommendation Develop a system to minimize exposures that includes preplanning jobs, establishing goals, trending exposures, monitoring program effectiveness, i and initiating corrective action before exposures become excessive. In addition, the feasibility of chemical or other cleaning should be consid-ered for the systems that are generating high exposure rates.

- Response PASNY maintains that NRC regulations and TMI modifications have L' impacted the task of establishing annual external radiation goals for the j total collective personnel, and that every attempt was made to maintain

the total ALARA. The following ALARA tools are presently or soon will p be employed at FitzPatrick

a. ALARA review forms are completed by the Radiological Eval-l,, uation Department.

l.

b. Informational planning meetings are held to update workers on radiation levels in their work areas.

'~,

i!

. . , FITZPATRICK (1981)

Page 27

c. Dn!!y Dose Summary reports are made available to department f

heads and most workers.

i

d. TLD versus self-reader dose explanatfori forms are s'Umitted to workers who do not report their daily doses over the TLD period within the prescribed limits, u

e Tbt 10CFR20.407 and Regulatory Guide 1.16 dose summary data l are printed out frequently and distributed to department heads.

f. Glove boxes, tents, and small portable air filtration equipment will be used more frequently. Utilization of this equipmant will reduce I

the use of respiratory equipment.

g. A program of corporate level review of estimated exposures for high exposure jobs has begun,

h. A Dosimetry and ALARA Supervisor will be added to the Radio-logical Evaluation Department staff.

1. The man-rem computer system will be updated providing a larger data storage area. This will provide a historical (man-rem) basis for future job planning.

.J sm g

f l+

l

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Paga 28 d TECHNICAL SUPPORT j An evaluation was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the on-site technical support activities. Specific items of interest included organization

, structure and size, performance monitoring, record keeping, communications,

.j adequacy of facilities, assessment of operating experiences, coordination of plant modifications, and reactor engineering activities.

l The overall operation of the Technical Services group appears to be good. Of J particular note was the effective monitoring of plant thermal performance and efficiency. One area of weakness was in the execution of the operating experience review program.

]

J

, TECHNICAL SUPPORT ORGANIZATION AND ADMINETRATION (INPO Procedure TS-701, Revision 1)

The team evaluated on-site engineering support to determine if its organization

. and administration promotes the accomplishment of required technical tasks.

O Particular attention was given to checking for an adequately staffed department with thoroughly knowledgeable individuals. Other areas of interest included the training program for this group and the administrative and clerical workload.

Finding (Criterion D)

. Although there has been attendance at selected vendor seminars, no commitment has been made to an ongoing training program to keep personnel knowledgeable of the state-of-the-art changes and specific plant systems.

Recommendation

, A formal training program should be developed and implemented to ensure all department personnel receive training in appropriate areas of station operation.

Response

The site is currently involved with a vendor in the establishment of a comprehensive engineering training program for newly hired personnel.

Establishment is targeted for March 1982. A formalized ongoing training program for all personnel will be developed and implemented by July 1982.

- m ENGINEERING SUPPORT

~

(INPO Procedure TS-702, Revision 2)

- ; A review was conducted to determine the staff's effectiveness in resolving problems and concerns of a technical nature. This included plant pc.rformance monitoring, communications with on- and off-site groups, document control

,, systems, and engineering support facilities.

m___.___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Pags 29

}

Finding (Criterion C)

., An effective system does not exist to control all plant documents. As a i result, the potential exists for uncontrolled documents to be used in

!J plant operations. Im documents, such as the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR)portantand Main Turbine Manual, are not up-to-date.

1 Recommendation j Expand the existing document control system to ensure that all docu-ments used by plant personnel are controlled and maintained up-to-date.

-, Response

The Technical Services Superintendent is making an extensive review of this area. The FSAR has been contracted for updating. Facilities for an

, improved temporary technical library are being surveyed. Drawing

, control systems are being investigated for required improvements by a 4 contractor for implementation in 1982.

~

s NUCLEAR OPERATING EXPERIENCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (INPO Procedure TS-703, Revision 1)

The effectiveness of operating expenence evaluation and follow-up was ex-amined. Areas reviewed included the program for handling in-house and industry operating experiences, utilization of experienced technical personnel, periodic review of progam effectiveness, and periodic and independent evaluation of industry experiences to verify proper classification.

1. Finding (Criteria C, E, F-2, F-6 and G-4)

The following deficiencies were identified in the management of the operating experience assessment program:

a. A periodic review is not conducted to ensure effectiveness and to identify areas where the program could be improved.

b. No provision is made to ensure information provided to operators does not conflict or contradict other sources.

c. No policy is in place for notifying other utilities promptly of significant in-house events that may have generic implications.

~

d. A multi-disciplined group independent from plant management does

] not conduct a second review of in-house events.

t

e. A periodic independent evaluation does not verify that pertinent information has been properly classified.

i Recommendation

a. A system should be developed to periodically determine if plant

. personnel receive and understand applicable information generated by the operating experience review program.

b. The operating experience program should ensure information dis-seminated to plant personnel does not contradict information received from other training programs.

- 1

, 1

/

FITZPATRICK (1981)

I' Page 30 i

') .

c. A mechanism should be developed and implemented for notifying i

l i, other utilities of significant occurrences that may have generic (

implications.

d. A second review of in-house occurrences should be done by a multi-disciplined group independent from plant management, e.g., a t

ij safety review committee or group that reports to off-site manage-ment.

,1

~,

e. The operating experiance program should provide for an indepen-dent evaluation to verify that information received is applicable and properly classified.

Response

- The formalized method and procedure to evaluate the sources of nuclear operating experience has been instituted and will be revised by July 1982, to include the following:

a. provisions for a periodic review

b. provisions for classifying and notifying other utilities of significant in-house events with generic implications

c. better guidance to ensure that information provided to operators

' does not conflict

d. formation of an on-site Safety Review Committee to perform independent evaluations of in-house events and to independently evaluate on a periodic basis the proper classifications of industry operating experience

2. Finding (General Criterion)

INPO/NSAC Significant Operating Event Reports (SOERs) are not being

- processed in a timely manner.

SOERs 81-1 through 81-3 have been reviewed and actions recommended.

However, it is not evident that action is complete.

SOERs 81-4 through 81-11 have yet to be reviewed.

Recommendation Conduct a timely review of SOERs and determine appropriate courses of action.

Response

Since the INPO review, SOERs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 11 have been analyzed and recommendations made. SOERs will be logged as open-action items with assigned due dates, when received. SOERs will be resolved in a timely manner. An update on SOER status will be provided in PASNY's follow on responses six months from the date of this report.

a 1

• J

~

~

FITZPAl' RICK (1981)

Page 31 PLANT MODIFICATIONS

- (INPO Procedure TS-704, ReviP%n 1)

Methods and programs for plant modifications were evaluated to determine if modifications are implemented in a safe and timely manner and if the proper

. . ,! quality of plant systems and components is maintained.

.J

1. Finding (Criteria A and C) 1 A backlog of uncompleted plant modification requests exists. The current status of modification packages, except NRC-mandated changes, is not well defined for the plant staff.

Recommendatio' A method of .tontul should be implemented to effectively determine the

-> status of all uncomJud plant modification requests. Plant manage-ment should develop an action plan to complete all modification requests

, in a timely manner.

Response

A dedicated task force of four engineers was established to review modification status. Additional resources are being requested to com-plete open modifications. It is expected that the majority of un-completed modification requests will be processed by March 1982.

9

2. Finding (Criterion I)

Plant drawings affected by completed plant modifications have not been updated to a marked-up status, and efforts to include modified hardware into the preventive maintenance program do not exist.

Recommendation Plant management should authorize necessary resources to update af-

, fected plant drawings to an as-built status. A program should be l developed to establish coordination between Technical Services and Maintenance to ensure applicable data is included in the preventive maintenance program.

, Response A new modification procedure has been implemented that clarifies responsibilities and will establish better control of drawings and overall modification status. The Authority is committed to having drawings updated by 1984.

s 9

w

+e.8 I

-, __v _-

• ~

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Appendix Page1 i'

ADMINISTRATIVE APPENDIX

'1 I

1. LISTING OF AREAS EVALUATED

'l ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION l OA-101 Objectives OA-102 Organization Structure OA-103 Administrative Controls

', OA-104 Quality Programs ,

OA-106 Industrial Safety OA-107 Surveillance Program OA-108 Personnel Qualifications TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION TQ-201 Training Organization TQ-202 Training Administration TQ-205 Training Resources TQ-223 Licensed Operator Requalification Training TQ-224 Shift Technical Advisor Training i

TQ-242 Non-Licensed Operator Training TQ-243 Licensed Operator Training OPERATIONS A

OP-301 Operations Organization and Administration OP-302 Tagout Practices

OP-303 Conduct of Shift Operations OP-304 Use of Procedures OP-305 Plant Status Controls OP-306 Operations Facilities and Equipment OP-307 Shia't Turnover MAWTENANCE MA-401 Maintenance Organization and Administration

., MA-402 Preventive Maintensnce MA-403 Maintenance Procedures MA-404 Work Control System MA-405 Maintenance History

'J M A-406 Control and Calibration of Test Equipment and Instrumentation MA-408 Maintenance Facilities and Equipment 4

A.4

- - , e -- - - . - - - _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Appendix Page 2 RADIATION PROTECTION AND CHEMISTRY

RC-501 Radiation Protection and Chemistry Organization and Administration

!' RC-503 Personnel Dosimetry 1' RC-504 Radiation Surveillance and Control RC-505 Waste and Discharge Control RC-506 Radiological Survey Equipment Control and Calibration RC-507 Personnel Health Physics Indoctrination RC-508 Process Water Controls

, RC-509 Health Physics Facilities and Equipment RC-511 Respiratory Protection Program 4

RC-538 Radiation Exposure Reduction Goals TECHNICAL SUPPORT TS-701 Technical Support Organization and Administration TS-702 Engineering Support TS-703 Nuclear Operating Experience Evaluation Program TS-704 Plant Modifications d

b 9

.+

i r a m

.__. _ _ _ . . . _,m ._. . __ - . .

. ~,

~

FITZPATRICK (1981)

Appendix Page 3

, II. JAMES A. FITZPATRICK POWER PLANT PERSONNEL CONTACTED Radiation and Environmental Services Senior Technicians

! Sub Foreman - Electrical j Superintendent of Power Quality Control Inspector

! Maintenance Superintendent Assistant Outage Coordinator Quality Assurance Engineer Assistant to the Resident Manager Operations Superintendent Quality Assurance Superintendent Welding /ISI Supervisor Auxiliary Operator B Radiation and Environmental Technician B Technical Services Superintendent Maintenance Supervisor Assistant Instrument and Control Superintendent Sub Foreman - Mechanical Radiation and Environmental Services Technician C Auxiliary Operator A Plant Engineer Instrument and Control Superintendent Quality Control Supervisor Shift Supervisor Auxiliary Operator A Instrument and Control Supervisoe Water Systems Supervisor Modification Coordinator Assistant to Superintendent of Radiation and Environmental Services Safety Supervisor Nuclear Training Specialist Technical Training Specialists (Consultant)

Radiation and Environmental Services Superintendent Resident Manager Electrical Maintenance Engineer Electronic and Relay Technician -I&C Computer liardware and Communications Specialist Technical Services Engineer Warehouse Manager Senior Nuclear Operator Radiological Waste Supervisor Nuclear Control Operator Clerk - Radiation and Environmental Services Department Shift Technical Advisor Training Coordinator Assistant Plant Engineer Senior Plant Engineer Operating Documents Coordinator Requalification Students Hot License Students

General Employee Training Students

= e t +

,w.

I c-1 i

~

d I

i f

l, .J i

I l.

.a l

l e sao e series, masonas av esensures tw= se b==amme vens, W f7W4 e sears essev (mer tes vt a se oss agma aa m tens we - Twa .- _. no ownsa wet on se peces a resa eser er nemens em as

• a se emesa en eeneau m e to eewwee meenes meeuwenssen enes we prayam. E pas %e you here been ensudes ewe - . m. esseed te beneAt W. e emmees adgemed a empuwesen pay peg esm.ameowe._ _

psywe en De yeems W esce enen e nemens em vee a yea _ _ . here Penyeetoe - . _ . _ _ em FVAaprtuermee missys somfeesyWre . _. _

The esmgaaet areWs to sore to Tereusene veney neares omie a tem t. _ . . assawsu eco casenwie w Ere n scenem feesseee *w The essacas Tva -- . esom e Part vaar of Time se a se came e pensre magumenna a empy er sw _ me, ne j- senews en w s, ernme run a se asesse puen ene e Pnrgednu SA i-

__ , . . . - . . ._ _ _ . . , _ _ ._. . - - ... _ . - _ , . - _ . _ .