ML20035A897
| ML20035A897 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 05/13/1991 |
| From: | Eugene Kelly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20035A875 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-92-162 NUDOCS 9303300177 | |
| Download: ML20035A897 (6) | |
Text
}#"%
[c,k f
j NUCHAM REGULATORY COMMISSION c/g,pp f
[P 3-meOloN I
[ ' *Sg*****/
g40 us AueNoitz Roxo KING OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 19406 h
MAY 131991
/
d r
u
'.l Dear Mr.[
SUBJECT:
CONCERNS YOU RAISED TO THE NRC REGARDING ACTIVITIES AT -
l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 i
This refers to your memorandum to Peter Habinghorst dated February 25,1991, in.which you provided us a copy of the response that you made to your supervisor regarding your performance appraisal.
L in your memo you requested that we take no action on the issues discussed in your evaluation response. We reviewed the response and have found that the issues are not specific enough and we therefore intend no action in these matters at this time. We note that the licensee has.
in place a program to track and disposition employee safety concerns at the Millstone site Regarding your claims of harassment, the Department of Labor (DOL) has the authority to.
investigate this issue. In order to protect your rights, you must file a written complaint with DOL within 30 days of the occurrence of the discrimination. Any such complaint can be filed with your local DOL office or:
The Office of Administration Wage and Hour Division Employment Standards Administration U.S. Department of Labor, Room 53502 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210 Your complaint must describe the firing or discrimination you feel occurred. A copy of the DOL's " Procedures for Handling of Discrimination Complaints Under Federal Employee.
Protection Status" is also enclosed for your attention. As you requested in your referral of these issues to us, we intend'no action in these matters at the present time; We note that Pete
.Habighorst provided these details to you verbally on Febnsary 28,1991.
D
,g 9303300177 921104 I'dott ahen g g.,
3 Uffed y"gemu,w y.
BA
-162 PDR CC'dWe wit, f, aa gi(=um g~~
s I
t
y L.
W t
t.
I Should you have any additional questions, or if I can be of funher assistance in this matter, plese call me collect at (215) 337-5120.
Sincerely, l
Eugene M. K
, Chief
+
. 4A Projects S i
i
)
t i
1
- 60 325 b23 F
1 RECElPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL ec msuum covtum reto not f ce etahanosat wait 4se, ne.erse; bec:
sn J. Stewart 5"
W. Raymond Q[
c,y/3 g
Allegation File No. RI-pA-Q202* /
R PcOh Cert fed Fee
! becal Debwery f ee Reptracted Dehvery fee Rebm Rece# showng to ecm ano Dale Dewerea Acturn Rece@ Fowba 40 wtom.
m Date, and Ascress 016ebwery TOT AL Postage an5 Fees 5
Postmark or Date lE
- 5 s.
ALLECN IONS AND COMPLAINTS - GENERAL RI 1210.1/1 APPENDIX 3.1 ALLEGATION RECEIPT REPORT cil kb
/
/'Co m Allegation No.
7kd 'O c
(leave blank) l Name:_'
Address:
i I
Phone: '
City / State / Zip:
Confidentiality:
Was it requested?
Yes Wo Was it initially granted?
Yes No Vas it finally granted by the allegation panel _
Yes No Does a confidentiality agreement need to be sent to alleger?
Yes No Has a confidentiality agreement been signed?
Yes No t
Memo documenting why it v.as granted is attached?
Yes N o _, _
r Position /
Title:
[
)
Alleger's Employe r:
k Q
Facility:
[0. : t s 2
Docket No.:
60 -3 b b
( Allegation Su. mary (brief description of concern (s): C N AI /9dnm.src ohk @ Data.s wtv e;.q l r ey e me 4L) [.., ha <s {; lug5 Q Q f a%L-& vAb e,6si @ A k MLi - @,( %M @hJ.
k ruhe.M5 kbCC(d rtuv k
$l 3&f' Number of Concerns:
5 Employee Receiving Allegation: ) WL 64 / 2 $dcw r (first two-initials and last nace) j%!,
SN: A u
Type of Regulated Activity (a) ~(Reactor (d)
Safeguards f-j C %.
yg\\\\
22 (b) _ Vendor (e) _ Other:
,Specify)
(
(c) _ Materials
,ag Materials License No. (if applicable):
- ~ U f S6 k; Functional Area (s)
Y(a) Operations (e) Emergency Preparedness Fl 5 e (b) Construction (f) Onsite Health and Safety !! M.5 5
__(c) Safeguards
__(g) Offsite Health and Safety '? S # 2 Other:
(d) Transportation 1 (h) M =4 T.
i n
(NRC Region I Form 207 r
l Revised 10/89)
/
J !
A3.1-1 i
s
)
ALLEGAT I ON MANA G EME NT SY STEM RUN D ATE: 910311 ALLEGATION NUMBER - RI-91-A-0046 g
/
DO CK E T / F AC ILIT Y / UNIT: 05000336 / MILLSTONE 2
/
/
DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:
/
3 DOCKET /FACILITT/ UNIT:
/,
/
/
DOCKET / F ACILITY / UNIT :
'l ACTIVITY TYPES - REACTOR MAT ERI AL LICEhS ES FUNCTIONAL ARE AS OPER ATIONS
)
i 13 2 IEC TECHN WORKED EXCESSIVE OT 2/16-2/17 & WERE TOO
)
DESCRIPTION - TO 00 WORK ON S AFTT STSTEMS 2) A T ECHN W AS NOT ADEQUAT T R AINED ON A CHANGE TO A CALIBRATION PROC. 3) THE NNECO C O NC E R N S -
O R-C ALL AND PAGER POLICY CAUSES WORKERS EXCESSIVE OT 4) 5
) IDENTIFIED PAGER ISSUE BEFORE WITH NRC AND NRC
'FAILE0 TO ADRESS PROBLEM. 5) INCIDENT OF H&I BY PEERS AND NU MANAGEMENT FAILED TO ADDRESS. NU NOT GIVING HIM FE
~
CONFIDENT - NO SOURCE
. LICENSEE EMPLOYEE s.
.e RECEIVED - 710302 BY - E KELLY
/ RI
.(FTS)346-5234 ACT ION OFFICE CONTACT
.E KELLY SAFETY SIGNIFIC ANCE - UNKNOWN BO ARD NOTIFIC ATION - YES STA TUS. OPE N SCHED COMPLETION. 910430 D AT E CLOSE0 -
ALLEGER NOTIFIED -
ALLEG ATION SUBST ANTI AT ED -
DI ACTION -
OI REPORT NUMBER -
REMARKS - ADP MET 3 /6/ 91 AND RECOMMENDED RESIDENT FOLLOWUP.
TURHOVER TO LICENSEE.
WORKER ADVISED OF HIS RIGHTS TD FILE A COMPLAINT WITH DOL ABOUT ALL EGED H ARR ASSMENT s
'J ISSUE.
- )
O SUPPORT OFFICE:
PB4r RESIDENTSr DRS ACTION PENDING: RESIDENT FOLLOWUP
}
(;
03CUMENT ATION:
ALLEGER LAST CONTACTED: 910302 (RECEIPT)
REFERENCE:
33 KEYWORD:SAFETT, H&I ENT ERED SYST 5M - 910311 CLOSED SYSTEM RECORD CHANGED - 910311 idormatica sa as re. rj g3 gg g
g
- 2 - zo
\\
Cl C n
rea
~
.n,.
1.
4 s
OC11,04 '91 08:43 NRC 111LLSTONE OFFICE P02
.c
?
i Qgdales oS AttECATION RECEIPT REPORT ggf.4. o.[fg [ ope c'GtST L l%I T6 DAM A11egation No.
$~WbWW I
ce d
(leave blank) 1 1
Name:
Address:
l phone:
City / State / Zip:
Conftdentiallty:
Yas it requested?
Yes No t/
Vas it initially granted?
Yes No v l
Vas it finally granted by the allegation panel Yes No Does a confidentiality agreement need to be sent
.l Yes No to alleger?
Has a confidentiality agreement been signed?
Yes No Memo docunenting why it was granted is attached?
Yes No _
Ep
/N6% ~'
ib c$.
Position /
Title:
[di M one L Occket No.:
9-33f, j
Factitty:
(Allegatten Sumary (brief description of concern (s): Ch h6af/Wgf4f l
(4i UW B00'?M b PYEv'10US @n(('r()f, l
e,
1
_o v;
a w 23 -
$, G zg l RNj I
D Number of Concer.ns:
dbt
@Sf Ch d
Employee Receiving Allegation: (firsttwointrialsandlastname)
/
E.3 l
s.a Type of Regulated Activity (a) _/eactor (d) _ Other: Safeguards Kn L!
R (b) _ Vendor (e) _
- Nf l
(c) _ Materials
.(Specify) jgg e 8 t;.
Materials License No. (if applicable):
3 M.2 F
.5 s M L FunctionalArt:(s):
h) Operations (e)EnergencyPreparedness-l i
(b) Construction
_ (f) Onsite Health and 5afety (c)$afeguards (g)OffsiteHealthandSafety h
(d) Transportation (h)Other:
.f t
(NRC Region I Fom 207 l
Fevised10/B9) l t'
w.
r p
i OCT,C4 '91 08:43 HRC MILLSTONE OFFICE P03
~
o
~
s Ue nt1pison of s,tteg.:iffun:
- 1. tiemordottum 1% ted Augus t IS, I??l: Alle<.ter hw becorte aurr-. of t iii s tt fiand ihat tivs ilt3 sa f aty coor din M or t.1 I 011:3Lt) t c. td 4 tJn i t 1 ] t?
4, r. h in reht one y, 1991 if "he was'pullituj a[
]
Ftie,pt c t.or recti ons: the inspector informed the a l lc<je=r o a' hiv tighe r otIh tIv D. par i men t o f Labor on Augor:4-36. 11 le f c.11 8 fis I l e.e h sr1 b i.e.,..
I h.ar.=ened. or di.acrimitte led agains t.
(nlieuer etc.ted th_*t he !*as novot..
iT be would ~ file 03th DOL.
1he ml1.Ger** f.. r 4_ h u r s i 4. t ;'d ih 4 t th.. the) t 1 iU 4 a: i ho i :i..o e..
disa t.i s fied ifi th the Conc <rrns T ask br oup e enpouru* io bin 2 9 e'. a.sn f t it l1i J in tr.t.e IJoi t 3 Sa 1 ei y injection l ent Leve1 es11eq..iiion.
In s perr: t er f.snessmen4.s I t ev i ei.t of pani a j ? :tj a t i on.; in.1) c atrut ti.a f.
I b.--
s,e t s i i :I so f e ty injection f a n l:. l e v e l cor> <:es n was docomuni.ed in
- a. t I c o.4 11 9 tu] y 9 JY't RI-Y1-A-114.
HIPC Regico I documenied ai. letter t o N') on 4
.requent mg a 30 day response.
f:ur the r. the te clin i c c i k uipw w.i s in spec t.ed in rout.ine inspection re po r t 'M-42~'e r'Y 1 -12 u n d e r 9 <r c t i.1o 5.8 the intpection concluded Hf fECD ecidon were adequa f e to corrut t.
4 fie.
level indicalot-i n a c cu re r.i e s.
P.
f1ra m'* d.4 4 e d o n An'.it t ti t ih 1991.
n ilecer d im p l esisu r n isi t h lit t r e - pe o r..
of du1y
- 1. 1W] concter niog a t loge t ion F 1 --Y1 w-vode.
41.1 e e disitssfied witit July 10 1W1 NRC t et.pon st.-
to p t *v i e. u.,
centein 44 com -).4 2 n '.
Speci fi cs were riot provided.
The alleges ele.o previded about the assignment of Job Leader.
Enclosed are act.ocia ted meinorandums *nd supporting information.
t i
b h
t