ML20035A885
| ML20035A885 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 08/27/1991 |
| From: | Wenzinger E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20035A875 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-92-162 NUDOCS 9303300133 | |
| Download: ML20035A885 (5) | |
See also: IR 05000336/1991018
Text
p+ ":*g*
.
,
[
A
e-
u ntro starts
-
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.
g p h '~ b-
,
%,
ma,
475 AtttNDALE ROAD
-
KING of PRUS$1A. PINNsYLVANIA 194:llL1418
,
h
g/) dp ~ , '
m u mt
, _ p2
_
Dear
This lener responds to your questions posed to the Region
,
our conclusions on the issue of reactor protection system (RPS)
Unit 2 on September 22,1989.
,
dated June 13, 1990.
We had previously addressed this issue withs ng conducte
Repon 50-336/89-22 issued in Februarf 1990.Our inspection
.
you in our letter
mented in NRCInspection
by all involved personnel, including yourse
'
.
a en and their bases
Unit 2 Inspection 91-18 which ended on August 10 1991.
ocumented as pan of
findings relative to the RPS tedg. Our assessraen,t remains
Enclosed with this memorandum are
you in June 1990.
rom that presented to
I hope that I have satisfactorily explair,ed our psik m e %
Sincerely,
9
\\
o
P 425 733 53b
7
Edward C. Wenzinger, Chief
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIEo Mall
(.
- yg?.g;ggy:
Projects Branch No. 4
i
1
rsee n ee m
.
w io -
^
1
i
_
_-
g
se
- -
-
.
I
~
g
po s
~ww
r
--
d
$
E
Y
p yp
cqw re,
s.A oe.~e, r
!
Dnc /)
ce
i
nestecco Denve3 Fee
==ne,
m
I
$EIaYlSe's*svlEe~3
'
l
tohl Povrp ana Fees
5
,
.
(
l
rouma w case
t
qn
9303300133 921104
) (f
4
-
g
FDIA
/
,HUBBARD92-162
- ,g.q
g
.
E
yp
k'
a
'
_
_ _ _ -
. _ _
. . . . . . _
. . _ _ _ _ .
.
,
.
' !27L'91 15: 19-
HRC MILLSTONE OPFICE
P01:
j
'
.__
1
.
.
.
.
l
. . *
,
-
.
,
.. ;
.
.
-
7b.-
L . ,,
Se m ~ ,, flPB
A4 y'
\\
i
rn m
/m
.) u e,ec we ./
-
,
-
,
,
Sce)
il
)?nax
. w o - o ~-s
n< r
>
..
-
-
,
L
Rarr,
-
.
- ? We~
/?u sasnan.s
.Y
a
'
19/ C.0 $
fdM O W
&!b
TO
,
f 8 MAlWv
terrrn.
s?s7w
. 1 /11/9i
i
1:an /1Z .-30 - A - A '3 L
l
..
-.
)
i
-
I
-
- . . .
.
9.0 .-
'
.
.
.
_
..
--
-
-
.
o
- oe
e
5:l
. . .
__
N
9
y,
.,
5
g
'*l
, kI, ,'
a o,
!? ME b'A)dC: a
e
Aa. ccm_gx2c .
F0lA.,_fz3)j_
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.
.
. _ .
..
_
1
,
i
t
. --
..
- f
'
,
.
.,
!
,
JUtf.f( 'V1 1di20
t4NU .111LLb i Utt UP F IUt:.
FUZ
.
ALLEGATION RI-A-232-01
I
performed
a
review of the
I
& C Department
Instructions
referenced in the licensees April 26, 1991 letter to W. Hehl.
The
instructions referenced do provide adequate guidance to enable a
qualified individual to perform a satisfactory biennial procedure
review.
One minor deficiency was noted during the
review.
Instruction 3.01 addresees the biennial review in Section 5.2 which .
addresses procedure format, but it does not refer to Instruction
3.02 Form 3 which addresses the specific items to be evaluated
during a biennial review.
This could lead to confusion - if an
individual was not aware of the form in Instruction 3.02.
xang
ngs -b45
f
.
, - _ -
,
t
.
"
'
ALLECATION RECEIPT REPORT
j
5
(2ff'$f?O'
Allegation No. N7"74-4=0 M
.
c
(leave blank)_
l
'
'
g
l
Address:
i
Name:,
,
. . .
,
Phone:
City / State / Zip:
Confidentiality:
'
'
Was it requested?
Yes
No A-
l
Vas it initia11y' granted?
Yes
No
Was it finally granted by the allegation panel
Yes
No-
Does a confidentiality agreement need to be sent
to alleger?
Yes
No.
Has a confidentiality agreement been signed?
Yes-
No
.l
Memo documenting why it was granted is attached?
Yes
No
!
fe
a 0M,4<3
position /Titie:
-
_
Facility:
MS -b
Docket No.:
50 4 %
/'
(Allegation Summary (brief description of concern (s): (h kunid bWW j
[miwks
IN MkIb wut
MF9 Cttrple'ks o7idw/ g Ntu,ed-
!
cw
'
i
J
t
l
k
[
,
Number of Concerns:
Ertployee Receiving Allegation: T. bidwd
b bxi- -
(first two thitials and last name)
l
Type of Regulated Activity (a) _A Reactor
(d) _ Other: Safeguards
Vendor
(e) -
(b) [ Materials
(c)
(Specify)
c
Materials License No. (if applicable):
-
a) Opesstions
i
Functional Area (s): 2(b) Construction
(f) Onsite Health and Safety
_((c) Safeguards
(g) Offsite Health and Safety
>
(d) Transportation
(h) Other:
.
'
!
P
(NRC Region I Fem 207
'
l
, '
Revised 10/89)
!
!
~
r
.
i
-,
-
.
. . _ ,
. .
,
TME 13 '90 12:06
11RC MILLST0ffE OFFICE
P02
e
-=e-
- _ _ _
_.
_
_ __ __
_
- . . _ - - - - ' ~ _ _ _
__
.
.
HEE 11NS WITHf
11hE
2:45 - 3:15F'.N.
PATE:
IECEMEER 10. 19V0
10FICs
CON EFsN3 DM FIENUI AL F ROCELUfsAL REVIEW
1.
lwas tasted with a biennial review of
procecure IC 2417t.
1he procedure e ppli ca t a c,n was t o
replace excore nuclear 2 n s t rumen t a t t ori .
During the process of the biennial review!
hed geestsens sogroundino technic +1 specificatsen
appl 3 c a ba li ty. I
was using a ecrently 3stucd
- L dr-periment snetruction 3.02 in2 tasted en 11/26/90.
T he d e p e r in,en t 2nstrectien provides f ur' er detasis
then the essociated edministrative contial pro
Jurt.
.-
7 errecceched the ruinor of the departnent
- nstruction (Ecb Erlen) with the questions on the
rev2ew process.
nr. Selen referredi ~
7 to the
IC deperiment head v2e a a,emo en questions stirround 2 r.g
the tit nnual
r+ v2 ew process.
-
believe
that Mr. Selen's attaens were
- rpropriate, anc
6 not a free open cennenication
n vi r on e,en t .
The insgector toldI"
'f he
i
or * cses he was unfairly being treated, or heressed
iould suttait his complaint with the Departrent
r
.c ror . I '
~7echnowledged the inspector's
t.
connent, and will not send his comp)sint to the DDL.
The reeson statedl
~7was that he espot
h&ve confidence in tne DOL to review his cese. I
' also poted no dc partnental training was
.*ftorced in the biennual review pre ess, and questioneo
- 1 technicians were the er,ropriate personne) for the
barnnual review.
2.
. 50 stated curing restorat3on from the
eetuel eutege, that eaintenince wort: on the nazn
16edwt
pump coupling was e tcon4p12thed withtpit
a
teg-cu
T he s hi f t supe 2sgrsinvolyggkere-
.
)
'saated a
pre-thought decision was esce not to take out the
feedpump curing coupling replacenent.
I n s ttr_t o r F e r_en n end a tlpn
1.
110 further action.
\\
?.
N) inmediate safety issue.
To process this issue need
3
c c r e t r e c 512 c s n t c t r,e t t on , utility.