ML20035A884

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Assistance in Resolving Concern,Identified by Util SSFI Re Compliance W/Gdc 17 Whereby Single Fault on Onsite Bus Could Cause Simultaneous Disruption of Power to Both Redundant 4 Kv Class 1E Divs
ML20035A884
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/1991
From: Hehl C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Calvo J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20035A875 List:
References
FOIA-92-162 NUDOCS 9303300130
Download: ML20035A884 (8)


Text

-

NUCLEAR At00LATORf CDMWsscN :

(( }

i

' REQ 4oNl; g

  1. 8 ALLENDAta noAs

,c

);

.)

109e or enuestA. PENNSYLVANIA 16400 1

MAY t o est MEMORANDUN FOR:

Jose Calvo,-Assistant Director.for Region I; Reactors Divi'sion of Reactor Projects - I/II l

Office of-Nuclear. Reactor-Regulation-f Charles W. Hehl, Director FROM:

D hision of Reactor Projects-j Region I-

I PROPOSED TASK It TERFACE REGARDING

SUBJECT:

COMPLIANCE OF MILLSTONE UNIT 2 WITH r

GENERAL DESIGN CRITERION 17 Your assistance is requested in resolving'a concern originally.

l identifled.by an SSFI conducted by the licensee approximately two 1

years ago and subsequently classified as.an allegation by the NRC.

l The technical concern involves the compliance of:M111 stone' Unit 2 with-General Design Criterion Number 17; specifically, a scenario j

wherein a single fault on an onsite bus and eventual loss of the j

f. t

- (-

Reserve Station Service Transformer (RSST).could'cause the simultaneous disruption of power to both Unit 2l redundant.4ky l!i class IE divisions.- Our preliminary assessment has identified one involving a protective relaying question ~of 1

two issues:

1 breaker coordination; and, the other a licensing question regarding GDC17 acceptability.

The implications -- if true - -

1 are of-such significance that. an. independent. assessment by' the-Enclosed is an' internal Northeast Utilities

.i NRC is warranted.

Li document dated May 2,1991,- containing an independent, third-party analysis of GDC-17 compliance for M111 stone. Unit' 2.

j We would appreciate your prompt attention'to this satter-andial l

preliminary assessment by July f i991: so that, if a significant-i veakness is identified, action can be taken'to ensure that^the.

~

station can mitigate the effects:of alblackout. -The Region I:

l point of contact-is Edward Wenzinger, Chief, Reactor Projects-

.l Branch 4 (FTS 346-5225).- This TIA proposal has been discussed with John Stolt of NRR.

'i j

h N1{

i Char s W. Heh [ Directok

'l Division of Reactor Projects j

Enclosure:

As stated l

9303300130 921104

}

l FOIA PDR PDR HUBBARD92-162 9//

i

i st*.nD c,..LL......, AN,EL.- C.e.,d,5 er -

.ui wa e c2w SIT.:

dc 5 e1 FANEL AT~ENCEEE:

t ALLEGATICN NO.

3-3I-S- 007 9 Chair-an - 7. k)c4 g,M

[

6v CATE: INw91 (MtE.162 s) star.cn chief -

t

i!CRI~Y-Hign (Vec h L:w Sectien Chief ( AOC) - 8. d/f, f

M k a, m m e/

SAF Ff SIGNIFICANCE: fes h Untnewn Others -

CCNC'.'ERENCE TO C' CIECUT:

CD @ SC E. b = e r-

k. Cecit e_ _

CONFICENTIALITY GRANTED:

Yes b bemeisder-l (See Allegat :n Rece1:: 0.e: r )

't t

v,. :. n.aD.t 'G Yes m

-. :. :. :.. n.

t is

_. __.. n iA~ RANT.~..-

Yes

'40

,w n

........,o

..........q. e:NT.

v e c.

't o L

_v.

u. t...... -....a..

I M S '..' *.rN..( :.:. ::t :rN. D '. TO Cu.H. u'..'.NG 'c. :. :_P.T L ~iTn.-

Yes No e

t s

.e...

  • L4..N' ff bl48 O

.)

Oh#OM.

]d 9 b 4

i i

5 Li

-I 4

)

t r

I i

1 oe I

a b

i e

l

~r

l APPENDIX 4.0 7

SAMPLE RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS l

h'"OCl3 PANEL ATTENDEES:

SITE:

I It f k] iG C [rt.5 f

lb.Ednt 1 Chairman -

ALLEGATION NO.:

i DATE:

/H 9/

(Mtg.1/1345)

Branch Chief -

PRIORITY:

High Medium Section Chief (AOC) - ke09 l

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: Yes NV$nkNn Others -

TELdAR r

v

( (d{dC wco bne$t $3 ST6* M

  • I l

CONCURRENCE TO CLOSE0VT: DD BC SC t

/

Ho CONFIDENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes f

(SeeAllegationReceiptReport)/

IS THEIR A 00L FINDING:

Yes' No IS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER VARRANTED:

Yes No i

HAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT:

Yes No 1

HAS LICENSEE RESPONDED TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER:

Yes No l

i ACTION:

I

1) Om kn< I wba t I )COM l%ckISn C r 2) t itR r i

Y nbf n

3) riv s A

L f u J <1 e 'If c 4 /,s'/m bt41 4) 5)

[

h NOTES:

i A4-1

APPENDIX 4.0 i

,, 50 I

SAMPLE RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECl$10NS

'.i t

$1TE: Ib it\\ 66 /, L 3 PANEL ATTENDEES:

e ALLEGATION NO.: SI-7/- A-ggh.T Cha1re.an -

i d 6m p f

DATE: *d. d ' t

(

J2 3 4 5)

Branch Chief -

I' W t rn ' '

hedium L

Section Chief (AOC) -

bad'Ay High ( u

.'{.o

~

PRIORITY:

r ya SAFETY $1GNIFICANCE: Yes No. Unknown Others

'n' O

l s.

CONCURRENCE TO CLOSEOUT: DD '56 $C E.

".J '/._

~

m CONFIDENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes No;

}

(See Allegation Receipt Report) "

j 5

15 THEIR A 00L FINDING:

Yes No j

15 CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED:

Yes No j

HAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT:

Yes No j

KAS LICENSEE RESPONDED TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER:

Yes No ACT!ON-5 ,, Arc * ,\\ Ar ~ ^..' :

  • G ll'I

^ ? .:ce m *, f r SNCtGi, J e

r. CG l

~ .- J c ~s. o.~ ~ d [ g) %,.Z. 3 erl. _. ~ ' s. 3 i .. t.:: i .;.n + n c/. 1 -( w A ( ~~ : ',~," r ~3 Or*t t r.~_ r 1 s? )) l4*f, b g.N ~- s ,a. h, ,-k u b l,- h & Q;b, ul OC % m. l< e ec:P \\ i <) 5) f N01ES: i -( 1 A4-1 t \\ +

?. i s i A.L L E G A T I O N

M A N-A G E.M E N T S Y $1 M

l p RUN DAT 10212 i ALLEGATION NUMBER - RI A-0029 i'. DOCKET /FACILITT/ UNIT: 05000245 / MILLSTONE 1 'r /f1 ! f" / ' 2 DOCKET /FACILITT/ UNIT: 05000336 /- MILLSTONE 2 /3 DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT: 05000423 / MILLSTONE 3 g" / j DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT: / g l ACTIVITY TYPES - RE ACTOR I [ l MATERIAL LICENSES - N OTHER ] ] FUNCTIONAL AREAS ,r 6 HCID g CONCERNS TO INDIVIDU AL IS BEING H AR ASSED FOR BRINGING DESCRIPT~l0N - THE NUCLEAR CONCERNS PROCRAM. 4 i* f CONCERNS - 1 1 1I C0kFIDENT - N0 f SOURCE LICENSEE EMPLOYEE F RECEIVED - 910123 BT - KS KOLACZYK / RI F l } ACTION OFFICE CONTACT - DR HAVERKAMP

  • (FTS)346-5120 L

l SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE - UNKNOWN BOARD NOTIFICATION - i I i STATUS ~10 PEN SCHED COMPLETION . 910415 DATE CLOSED - l,. l ALLEG ATION SUBST ANTI ATED - ALLEGER NOTIFIED - 1 j j OI ACTION - OI REPORT NUMBER - 6 [ REMARKS - L' -j l, 1: l k-- i ) r i SUPPORT OFFICE: RPS-4Ar RESIDENTS '3 l l ACTION PENDING: CONVENE PANEL I 1 g DOCUMENTATION: 'l All.EGER LAST CONTACTED: 910123 (RECEIPT) j;~ .l

REFERENCE:

KEYWORD: HARASSMENT, HEID ENTERED SYSTEM - 910212 CLOSED STSTEM - RECORD CHANGE '910212 1 /0 l y $6: i k* 5

APPENDIX 4.0 SAMPLE RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECIS10NS i' 51TE: b PANEL ATTENDEES: ALLEGATION NO.: Al-4I oO V3 Chairman - M9 9 mi t+ (Mtg.(I234S) Branch Chief - E C L&W.,.o DATE: Y19I C s PRIORITY: High h Low Section Chief ( AOC) - Nowh. o _ b'tw# f SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: Yes N Others - bud % l CONCURRENCE TO CLOSEOUT: DD BC SC Nkik(ick+wd 4 Widtb 9 CONFIDENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes No (See Allegation Receipt Report) 4 L IS THEIR A DOL FINDING: Yes No 1 IS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED: Yes No j HAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT: Yes No KAS LICENSEE RESPONDED TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER: Yes No t ACTION: 1) Cho c aMe94 b [o kl-77-/r Tc:CS a nc[ 8/- fFf-dO/O f R $ 96 -A N2ct %lim {tML.! ble l i 2 O ?!b dew k h0L, d cud niwJ kPJ11,l,4nt 1/21h, 3) r4 40,1 asa a n tel sexc% em.3L b ew,tib. klo (Ok r j 4 i r o et v;td t MveJ I A byr) t[ _ w o k '. a lIet.te e u d % s A M n. m bo kef3 \\ l 4) ek-kL G n L\\ m.,I is dll,, <kd (%e.TR90-19 h Y ./ 5) j 5mr[ar /h1 /f[- W-kd)39 NOTES: t I A4-1 e [Y

f A L L E 3A T I C t;

  • A % &. E M EN T
5. Y 5T ~ f 'i ALLEGATION 4UMLER - RI-91-t-37;3 RUf: 3 ATE: 21:22?

3OCKET/ FACILITY / UNIT: 05:COI3e /-MILLSTONF Z / l 30CKETIFACILITY/UMIT: / /. l 30CKET/ FACILITY / UNIT: / 3OCKET/ FACILITY / UNIT: / /; t ACTIVITY TYPES - REACTOR E MATtRIAL LICEU555 L OPEPATIONS OTHEP FUNCTIONAL ARE A 5 f t Hs! DESCRIDTION - 1) HiI PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL 2) 09ESTION CONCERNING LICENSEE MET HOD F0; HAN3LIN3 35UE3 3) GENERAL A;35RTION THAT. v!0LATION EXI5T *) WORK W I T M C-U T A FIPE WATCH 5) GENERAL 2 CONCERN 5 - I1;!?ENTS 6) R: CCW REdORK. 6 l L::ENEEE LMPLGYE! C]NIDENT - NT l SOURCE OJ Has:C*0R3i '/ ?I RECEIVED - 210 ?7 SY (?15)337-5120-0? Hay?PKaan ACTION 3:FI;E CONTACT O'1KNewW 5019; t@T;;;CATIDH - 5AFETY SIGyIFICANCI f 0106:1 9AT: CLOSE 3 ~ 0?Pg SCHED 09MDL5T!3N STATUI ALLEGAT!Of. SUL5T ANTI AT ED - ALLfGET N3T:FIED - 3 !a0F* NJ5EIR JI ACTION t REMARKS - r k i SJPPORT OFFICE:_RPS-AA, RE5!OEt4T5 ACTION DENDING: CD'1V E NE PANEL DOCUMENTATION: ALL EG E R LAST CONTACTED: 010227(RECEIPT) RiFEPENCE: l AE YWGR3:H AR ASSME1T, INTIMIDATION,H'.20r APPR AIS AL,VIDL AT 005 j RiCORD C-ANGED - 91022' ENTERED SYSTEM - 010227 CLOSED SYSTEM u hh b'\\Ni

i RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS l! i Ch 6 PANEL ATTENDEES: SITE: s N-9 d-f - CO Chairman - Wi49-th h - l ALLEGATION NO.: DATE: O@ (Panel No. I 2 3 4 h E. ranch Chief - PRIORITY: High Hedium Section Chief (AOC) - [c] SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: Yes Unkn Sr. Allecation Coord (SAC) MTtt s-CONCURRENCE TO CLOSECUT: DD BC OI Fepresentative - b& ( % nmte CONFIDENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes (Other) 45eh (See Allegation Receipt Report) g (T) Q Q h IS THERE A HARASSMENT / DISCRIMINATION ISSUE: Yes IF YES, I) has the individual been informed of the DOL process and the need to f21e a complaint within 30 days Yes No 2) has the individual filed a complaint with DOL Yes No l 3) has a letter been sent to the con:pla:nant seeking Yes No l any safety concerns Yes do [ IS A CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED: Yes i IF YES, HAS !T BEEN SENT HAS THE LICENSEE RESPCNCED TO THE CHILLING ETTECT LETTER: Yes No j RESP ECD ACT!CN: mc A r, A l, i 2) y N 3) l 5) NOTES: 1 f l 'f 'J 1 t}}