ML20035A878
| ML20035A878 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 02/22/1991 |
| From: | Hehl C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Mroczka E NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20035A875 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-92-162 NUDOCS 9303300121 | |
| Download: ML20035A878 (11) | |
Text
r-L H B 2 2 1991 Docket No. 50-336 File No. RI-90-A-232 Northeast Nuclear Energy Campany ATTN: Mr. Edward C. Mroczka Senior Vice President Nuclear Engineering and Operations P.O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141-0270
Dear Mr. Mroczka:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission recently became aware of certain activities at Millst'one Unit 2 which we have determined to require your review and followup. The details' of these activities are enclosed.
We request that the results of your review and disposition of this matter be subntitted to Region I within 30 days of the date of receipt of this letter. We request that your response-.
contain no personal privacy, proprietary, or safeguards information so it can be released to the public and placed in the NRC Public Document Room. If necessary, such information shall be contained in a separate attachment which will be withheld from public disclosure.
The affidavit required by 10 CFR 2.790(b) must' accompany your response if proprietary
[
information is included. Please refer to file number RI-90-A 232 when submitting your response.
The encio ure to this letter should be controlled and distribution limited to personnel with a "need to know" until your investigation of the matter has been completed and reviewed by NRC Region I. The enclosure to this letter is considered Exempt from Public Disclosure in accordance with Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2.790(a). However, a copy of this letter excluding the enclosure will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
l The response requested by this letter and the accompanying enclosure are not subject to the.
clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Papenvork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
9303300121 921104 PDR FOIA WBBARD92-162 PDR Q
\\k mcm acoan con
^b d
.a
9 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company 3
.i OFFICIAL RECORD COPY' Your cooperation with us is appreciated. We will gladly discuss any questions you may have concerning this information.
i Sincerely, riginal signed By J'T,r's (LQty %,rp C4 i
yCharles W. Hehl/ Direct,~
j Division of Reactor Projects I
Enclosure:
Details (10 CFR 2.790(a) INFORMATION) l cc w/o encl:
S. E. Scace, Station Director, Millstone Public Document Room (PDR)'
[
Iecal Public Document Room (LPDR) f State of Connecticut bec w/ encl:
}
- W. Raymond, SRI Millstone M. Perkins, RI-90-A-23' l
J. Stewart, DRP h
RI:DRP Rl:DRP RI DRP RI:DRP A
P ph k amp Venz nger Hehl 2/f/91 2#1/91 2,f/91.
2/JV91 Eb*k OFFICIAL RECORD COPY olk y Tiv/w l
4b'PJ.H.
9 I
1
~
~
m
.p i
h
{/
~
g
\\LIMITEIFDISTRIBUTIONWOTJOR PGBidC41SCLOSURV t
ENCLOSURE-The following problems have been identified concerning biennial procedure review and work -
)
on a main feedwater pump coupling.
1.
A potential confusion exists in the 1&C department concerning the biennial review of department procedures, specifically with the requirements of a new I&C department
~!
instruction 3.02 which deals in part with technical specification applicability. An individual was recently tasked with biennial review of IC 2417C, which was to be used in the replacement of excore nuclear instrumentation. During the review, a I
question arose concerning technical specification applicability. A memo to department-supervision was generated addressing the question to the I&C department head.
i Has there been adequate training on the performance of biennial reviews so that the individuals tasked with this responsibility can properly fulfill their responsibilities? Is the generation of a memo to the department head appropriate means of communication' for questions dealing with the completion of biennial reviews? Please discuss.
j
~ i t
2..
Maintenance work was completed on a main feedwater pump coupling without appropriate tagout controls. This work was accomplished during restoration from the recent outage. The shift supervisors invo'.ved were (*). A decision was made not to-i remove the feed pump from service during the coupling replacement.
Please discuss the validity of the above assertions. - Please discuss if any procedural--
non-compliances were involved in the feed pump coupling replacement and if the tagout control was adequate. Please include any generic deficiencies which may have been identified in your review.
l The identity of (*) may be obtained from the senior resident inspector.
I 1g n3 n-.3 b
erreo opmaupo6EeraxwrsirewsC+o uRE j
i I
s.
v
APPENDIK 4.0 l
SMPLE RECORD OF A'LLEMTION PANEL DECI$10N$
l N,l-TO "k"" 07.3 D PANEL ATTENDEES:
SITE:
k[oqd5 878 ~c1 Chairman -
ALLEGATION NO.:
/22o[40 (Mtg.h2.345)
Branch Chief -~ k /Mefthm
- es l
DATE:
PRIORITY:
High Medium @
5ection Chief (AOC) - N Mad
<3 - O/r_
SAFETY $1GNIFICANCE: Yes @ Unknewn Others -
CONCURRENCE TO CLOSEOUT: 00 @ SC CONFIDENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes No l
j (Sce Allegation Receipt Report /
i 15 THEIR A COL FINDING:
No IS CHILLING EFFECT LETTEVVARRANTED:
Yes No
/
MAS CHILLING EFFECT t,ETTER BEEN SENT:
Yes No i
/
Yes No HAS LICENSEE RESPpHDED TO CHILLING EFFECT LETTER:
ACT10N:
1) bn1cA ) [*to 'm SMS Yo I< esS CC.
[G) eu ala$
kt.3) {t 2 e'e k - Gb 4 o k 2) o ti Tsda i is nc4
/4 CE'.
kh louDbre, odh a b400b h N n.
rat Cm 3)
\\ '
/
/
/
4) 5)
NOTES:
l A4-1 t
I 1
1
.~.
i ALLEGAT ION M A NAGEMENT SYSTEM
~ ALLEG ATION NUMBER - RI A-0232 RUN DATE: 91011 6 DOCKET / F ACILITY / UNIT : 05000336 / MILLSTONE 2
/2 I
/
'30CKET/ FACILITY / UNIT:
/
DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:
/
/
/
00CKET/ FACILITY / UNIT:
/
ACTIVITY TYPES - REACTOR i
MATERIAL LICENSES -
OPERATIONS FUNCTIONAL ARE AS DESCRIPTION - 1) BIENNI AL REVIEW TR AINING 2) M AINT ENANCE ON MFP COUPLING WITHOUT A TAGOUT.
CONCERNS -
l 2
CONFIDENT - NO SOURCE - LICENSEE EMPLOYEE RECEIVED - 901213 BY - PJ HABIGHORST
/ RI (FTS)346-5120 ACTION OFFICE CONTACT - DR HAVERKAMD SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE - NO BOARC tt0TIFICATION - 40 010331 DATE CLOSED -
STATUS - OPEN SCHED COMPLETION ALLEGATION SU3ST ANTI ATED -
ALLEGEP NOT!FIE0 -
O! ACTION -
OI PEPORT NUM3ER -
REM ARKS - AOC T O TUPNOVFR TO LICENSEE.
t i
SUPPORT OFFICE:
RPS-4A, RESIDENTS ACTION PENDING: TURNOVER TO LICENSEE DOCUMENTATION:
ALLEGER L AST CONT ACTED: 901213(RECEIPT)
REFERENCE:
KEYWORD: PROCECUREr TAGOUT I
ENTERED SYSTEM'- 910116 CLOSED SYSTEM -
RECORD CHANGED - 910116 1/
/(
t
.c I
APPENDIX 4.0 SAMPLE RECORD OF ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS SITE:
tA M s h e und 'L PANEL ATTENDEES-ALLEGATION NO.: R.I-M-A -ooo Chairman - I tJ. M I
uu DATE:
t/23/N (Mtg.[D2 3 4 5)
Branch Chief - E. mz m,k l
-u PRIORITY:
High Medium Low Section Chief (AOC) -
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE: Yes No Unknown Others -
d i
1.
wA CONCURRENCE TO CLOSEOUT: 00 BC SC o
k, M e,4c_ ku s (See Allegation Receipt Report) @
CONFIDENTIALITY GRANTED: Yes g
)
h g
jg
(
IS THEIR A DOL FINDING:
Yes IS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER WARRANTED:
Yes h
3, No3)Ie e
HAS CHILLING EFFECT LETTER BEEN SENT:
Yes
@g) l HAS LICENSEE RESPONDED TD CHILLING EFFECT LETTER:
Yes ACTION:
{
1) 0
%&w Mm 6 Jud & sn,u 1/24/9/
P&mC/ se~
- & W Am Eco
- 2) _ B& cha- :>/ DRP 14 nGx, --_-
~Ja.
Ak &..lb w i
- 3) %,z.vodw c AM aLn. n /s n.
K_ sdJgc c7' w?T6 ad im/ maw /.w w % W w~ La m/ms, f~s e
i i
f f/ N n W s &l A49de,%=Sah m dwAf 2A d f).
/
i r/
5) i NOTES:
A4-1
/
)
y t
i j
A L L E G'A T ION MA NAGEMENT SYSTEM e
ALLEGATION NUMBER - RI-91-A-0012 RUN DATE: 910123 DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT: 05000336 / MILLSTONE 2 00CKET/ FACILITY / UNIT:
/
DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:
/
DOCKET / FACILITY / UNIT:
/
ACTIVITY TYPES - REACTOR MATERIAL LICENSES -
ONSITE HEALTH AND SAFETY FUNCTIONAL A RE A S i
i DESCRIPTION - INDIVIDUAL W AS ALLOWED T O LE AVE SITE AFTER SETTING OFF RADIATION MONITORS WITHOUT PERMISSION OR CLEARANCE FROM MILLSTONE HEALTH PHYSICS.
CONCERNS -
1 SOURCE
. LICENSEE EMPLOYEE CONFIDENT N0; RECEIVED - 910122 BT - KS KOLACZYK
/ RI ACTION OFFICE CONTACT - DR HAVERKAMP
- (FT S) 346-5120 SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE - UNKNOWN BOARD NOTIFICATION -
STATUS
.0 PEN SCHED COMPLETION
.910331 DATE CLOSED -
ALLEGATION SUBSTANTIATED -
ALLEGER NOTIFIED -
OI ACTION -
OI REPORT NUMBER -
REMARKS - RESIDENT INSPECTOR TO DISCUSS W/ LICENSEE REF POTENTIAL WEAKNESSES. ACK LTR TO ALLEGER. SRI CONTACT W/ ALLEGER REF ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN.
S' PPORT OFFICE:
RPS-4A, RESIDENTS J
ACTION PENDING: RESIDENT /LIC CONTACTrACK LTR TO ALLEGER D3CUMENTATION:
ALLEGER LAST CONTACTED: 910122 (R EC EIPT)
REFERENCE:
KETWORO: HEALTH PHYSICS RECOPD CHANGED - 910123 ENTERED SYSTEM - 910123 CLOSED SYSTEM
'O nl'
.uty.
kg : iks, t du kW,iny %&& as" issue JJ\\g is,\\90
- Q,4A s
\\\\' \\%
C~V k aAe7m i
RE'- bassm%t 6pW4 (o T q cke s 6 4 cah as gswout. (4;d kod lxecqgo /ef, 7
-fo Seniw rmnajusd).
- h k
}ca s
<d i a os wasce 6 6cce scd/cd " 4 Y4s.44d d au p<hes' " He sku v&+ le was phub :n v4 4 J ruelvlim.
0M44 sa/f cmece:
(2) T regel d cdhp 4 Fcb//y on 7
t AA, hp du 44p Neua _cs httbu0 Nic3u 4ked vnc En N Ac -feb7 ca.
emaAf 1[/5[9/
L LL: /W, at Aa. !?i i,n
[rga o
g
/(/- 7/-pg 2 y l
grU J 5,199/
09 </o - Smio/u Cd%*Me)u(hIffSb'VL
( 0 Repuu %.4 pice <c Go Kct 4-ru sm3 %a-Q Mc leu Kis yetd,61 ku cm me kad.bg4 (4e iAh l
-w -ut W4 4pfc.i W 4t M rI A /u 3 - v a cc 43 A e 4<..
i (25 k)wkh Atp " %
sr kskD M, A Ma&a %My 30 6au Byns capac 6 7.,-< M na d a uc
Aile p c q u h,f(4 s e A :
- 64 h ru pnhiq'
% eqb snh
-l gen / eagaue. A ru.he "
we>J.A of 4;c um Je ro o kic 4 e
" % as us wb.maqu3 L. gc"3 ud s " Art b) ett (d'I(unswbsfch".
H<.rtJ hves % to~ k, lows ao 6" <J Ac au w " N)ny,s eupq "
o\\<&empt.yc.
- NekA m 31.e o pou uce in MdMob QC/QA E
ps e, E4Me,a=w4-yee ng
.o i
+
b9(-A-oo27 04<bc0 a$ejer :
I
- n st s, y%/u s:cy
-ain
-Lcxa S 3//Sj4/
3: Isym s wt &n i
s-
,,,a, R<hLssusgre w ~e p ec L. a 7.s,w/ m l a96 q routhe us w
he. b.s er,cv% keid-peedy c Se:uaulise S 61.
4 Ok sce/n nwspwea4 lh I.s c wolf;~7 v4 Ac;ft cat a ut.w<-
s,6. C /Wh x appms 4 4c t<hi4ed 7
Ar 4 5 qviwuce pee,> ts certzig,
M Ac. 6 aaa:
p
. find c)e cis scm I.
Sea Sbf-S/v
\\
Nurhk:
Re pane 9 t
l
/
210 00 r' ' 006;-;
W 03 M N : '_3 IFC FI IO3.ET PCC1 g), g g p
^
Phxd:
$m 4: /A
~
sy sae u p Auey ensz
/0 Tf2&[9'Nk
\\.
OHW6
% 46-oema,am.r..,
9 hoob,Mkbb,OoO
}&
as Topak E
E. 6 es. buQ Df h
g