ML20023C924

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Importance of ASLAP Decision Re Protection of Confidentiality of Informers & Allegers.Dissenting Opinion Points Out Cautions That Should Be Observed in Informing Allegers or Informants
ML20023C924
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, South Texas
Issue date: 05/14/1981
From: Thompson D
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Engelken R, Grier B, James Keppler, James O'Reilly, Seyfrit K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III), NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20023A411 List:
References
FOIA-82-603 NUDOCS 8305180337
Download: ML20023C924 (1)


Text

NAY 14 1991

( {Q m

MEMORANDUM FOR:

B. -H. Grier, Director, Region I J.> P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II J. G. Keppler, Director, Region III K. V. Seyfrit Director, Region IV R. H. Engelken Director, Region V FROM:

Dudley Thompson, Director Enforcement and Investigations, IE PROTECTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANTS - APPEALS BOARD

SUBJECT:

DECISION, SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT The enclosed Appeal Board Decision in the South Texas Project case is an important one with regard to protection of confidentiality of informants and allegers.

Although the decision supports the staff position, the dissenting opinion points out some of the cautions we should observe in informing allegers or informants of the limitations i

in our ability to protect their anonymity (See Section 2, pp 23-24).

.'. s o n,

u ey Enforce ent and Investigations Office of Inspection and Enforcement Enc 1:

ASLAB Decision dtd 5/8/81 L

cc:

V. Stello R. DeYoung J. Sniezek

?

N. Moseley H. Thornburg W. Ward R. Carlson C. Alderson J. Streeter J. Gagliardo A. Johnson 0305100337 830309 4

D A82-603 PDR

-,~.

.