ML20008F619

Forwards Schedule & Resources Estimate for Nuclear Safety Task Force Recommendations.Detailed Schedule Provided Re Completion of Engineering Studies Identified in Util

ML20008F619
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	04/16/1981
From:	Baynard P FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
3-041-21, 3-41-21, TAC-12961, NUDOCS 8104210391
Download: ML20008F619 (2)

Text

'r Florida Power C C A P '1 % A Y 8 0 N Apri1 16 1981

1. 3-041 -2i File:

3-0-3-a-3 Qp(A' Mr. Harold R. Denton s

j Director

(

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

\\-

"/\\

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.

20555 9

%\\..s.T/$'g' e$ ~

n E

IJ

~

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 6

Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72

<?s

,/

Nuclear Safety Task Force Follow Up 4 N _,,: g \\' f

/ %igis

Dear Mr. Denton:

In our letter of March 6,1981, Florida Power Corporation stated we woulo provide you with a schedule and resources estimate for all Nuclear Safety Task Force recommendations which will result in engineering studies to be completed in 1981.

By this letter, Florida Power Corporation fulfills that comitment. is a detailed schedule for completion of the engineering studies identified in oe ciarch 6,1981, letter. We anticipate that com-pletion of the engineering work identified in Attachment I will involve the expenditure of approximately $70,000.

We will advise you of the re-sults of these studies and our plans for further pursuit of these items early in 1982.

We will also advise you promptly of any significant safety concerns resulting from these studies.

Very truly yours, 4

4 P. Y aynard Manager

/l Nuclear Support Services 00/

Friend (T-07)D1-3 3

/ /

81042103%

f General Office 320s inat -tcurtn street scu:n. P o sex 14c42, st Petersburg. Fcnca 33733 813-566-5151 f

Nuclear Safety Task Force Tollow Up In our March 6, 1981 response, FPC identified 23 Muclear Safety Task Force recreendations which will require addditional evaluation.

Cf these 26 items, 7 have been identified as known problems which will require a formal engi-neering study ta determine the best alternative salution.

These are safety Task Force recomendations 1.21, 3 13, 3 22, 3.23, 5.82, 6.1, and 6.8.

A schedule for the expletion of the studies for these items is shown below. Tne remaining 19 items are in FPC's opinion patential problems that require addi-tianal investigative research before it is determined that a problem exists.

The schedules for this investigative work for each of these items is shown below.

The remaining 19 items are in FFC's opinion patential proble.s that require additional investigative research before it is determined that a pro-blem exists.

The schedules for this investigative work for each of these itets is shown below. Following cocpletion of our additional review of each of these items, we will provide you with our conclusions and justification for these con-clusions as to whether or not a problem exists. In the cases where actual pro-blems are identified, we will provide you with our schedule to resolve each item.

Safety Task Force Recomendtion #

Schedule for Study or Review 1.21 7-3-81 3 13 8-14-81 3 22 8-14-81 3 23 8-28-81 5.82 6-12-81 6.1 10-16-81 6.8 12-31-81 1.19 5-22-81 5.65 5-29-81 5.105 5-29-81 5.106 6-12-81 3 21 6-12-81 5.75 6-26-81 5.76 6-26-81 5.113 7-3-81 5.95 7-13-81 3.6 7-13-81 39 8-7-81 3 10 8-14-81 5 35 8-21-81 3.12 8-28-81 3 11 9-3-81 3 24 9-3-81 5.49 9-25-81 5.54 10-9-81 5 36 10-30-81