|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20196G4021999-06-18018 June 1999 Comment on FRN Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy NUREG-1600, Rev 1 & Amend of 10CFR55.49.Concurs with Need to Provide Examples That May Be Used as Guidance in Determining Appropriate Severity Level for Violations as Listed ML20206H1881999-05-0606 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App K Re ECCS Evaluation Models. Commission Grants Licensee Exemption ML20206H2221999-05-0404 May 1999 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 That Would Allow STP Nuclear Operating Co to Apply ASME Code Case N-514 for Determining Plant Cold Overpressurization Mitigation Sys Pressure Setpoint.Commission Grants Exemption ML20206M5111999-04-30030 April 1999 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1083 Re Content of UFSAR IAW 10CFR50.71(e). Recommends That Listed Approach Be Adopted for Changes to Documents Incorporated by Ref CY-99-007, Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-0071999-02-22022 February 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Changes to Improve Insp & Assessment Processes for Overseeing Commercial Nuclear Industry That Were Published in Fr on 990122 & in SECY-99-007 TXX-9825, Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps1998-12-14014 December 1998 Comment Endorsing NEI Comments on Proposed Rulemaking to 10CFR50.65, Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness at Npps ML20195C7541998-11-0505 November 1998 Order Approving Application Re Proposed Corporate Merger of Central & South West Corp & American Electric Power Co,Inc.Commission Approves Application Re Merger Agreement Between Csw & Aep ML20155H5511998-11-0202 November 1998 Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.71(e)(4) Re Submission of Revs to UFSAR ML20154C4101998-09-30030 September 1998 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Comanche Peak Electric Station Endorses NEI Comment Ltr & Agrees with NEI Recommendations & Rationale ML20248K5051998-06-0909 June 1998 Confirmatory Order Modifying License (Effective Immediately).Answer for Request for Hearing Shall Not Stay Immediate Effectiveness of Order ML20216E1051998-04-0707 April 1998 Comment Supporting Draft RG DG-1029 Titled Guidelines for Evaluating Electromagnetic & Radio-Frequency Interference in Safety-related Instrumentation & Control Sys NOC-AE-000109, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI1998-03-30030 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev to 10CFR50.55a, Industry Codes & Standards.South Texas Project Fully Endorses Comments to Be Provided by NEI ML20217H3611998-03-26026 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft GL 97-XX, Lab Testing of Nuclear Grade Charcoal, Issued on 980225.Advises That There Will Be Addl Implementation Costs ML20198Q4851998-01-16016 January 1998 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63A by P Crane That Requests NRC Amend Regulations Re Emergency Planning to Require Consideration of Sheltering,Evacuation & Prophylactic Use of Potassium Iodide for General Public ML20211A4871997-09-12012 September 1997 Changes Submittal Date of Response to NRC RAI Re Proposed CPSES risk-informed Inservice Testing Program & Comments on NRC Draft PRA Documents ML20149L0311997-07-21021 July 1997 Comment on Draft Guides DG-1048,DG-1049 & DG-1050.Error Identified in Last Line of DG-1050,item 1.3 of Section Value/Impact Statement.Rev 30 Should Be Rev 11 ML20140A4871997-05-27027 May 1997 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Safety Conscious Work Environ.Util Agrees W/Nuclear Energy Inst Comment Ltr ML20137U3531997-04-0808 April 1997 Order Approving Application Re Formation of Operating Company & Transfer of Operating Authority ML20133G5411996-12-0505 December 1996 Transcript of 961205 Meeting in Arlington,Tx Re Comanche Peak Thermo-Lag Fire Barriers. Pp 1-111 ML20135B7881996-11-29029 November 1996 Order Approving Corporate Restructuring of TU to Facilitate Acquistion of Enserch Corp ML20128M8011996-10-0303 October 1996 Comment Opposing Proposed NRC Generic Communication, Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism & Other Vessel Head Penetrations ML20116B8871996-07-19019 July 1996 Transcript of 960719 Predecisional Enforcement Conference Re Apparent Violations of NRC Requirements at Plant ML20097D7321996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re CPSES Request for Amend to Its Regulations Dealing W/Emergency Planning to Include Requirement That Emergency Planning Protective Actions for General Public Include Listed Info ML20094Q6421995-11-28028 November 1995 Comment Supporting Petition for RM PRM-50-62 Re Amend to Regulation Re QAPs Permitting NPP Licensees to Change Quality Program Described in SAR W/O NRC Prior Approval If Changes Do Not Potentially Degrade Safety or Change TSs ML20094H4801995-11-0808 November 1995 Comment Supporting Nuclear Energy Inst Comments on Proposed Rules 10CFR60,72,73 & 75 Re Safeguards for Spent Nuclear Fuel or high-level Radwaste TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20091M6441995-08-25025 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule Re Review of Revised NRC SALP Program.Believes That NRC Should Reconsider Need for Ipap or SALP in Light of Redundancy ML20086M7921995-07-0707 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed GL Process for Changes to Security Plan Without Prior NRC Approval ML20084A0181995-05-19019 May 1995 Comment Suporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Containment Leakage Testing.Supports NEI Comments ML20077M7311994-12-30030 December 1994 Comments Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20077L8711994-12-22022 December 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50,55 & 73 Re Reduction of Reporting Requirements Imposed on NRC Licensees ML20073B6951994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Authorizing Signing & Filing W/Nrc OL Amend Request 94-016 ML20073B6731994-09-19019 September 1994 Affidavit of Cl Terry Re License Amend Request 94-015 ML20072P5441994-07-13013 July 1994 Testimony of Rl Stright Re Results of Liberty Consulting Groups Independent Review of Prudence of Mgt of STP ML20092C3911993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Rl Balcom to Demand for Info ML20092C4031993-11-15015 November 1993 Partially Deleted Response of Hl&P to Demand for Info ML20058E0561993-11-10010 November 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule Re Staff Meetings Open to Public. Believes That NRC Has Done Well in Commitment to Provide Public W/Fullest Practical Access to Its Activities ML20056G3351993-08-27027 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Review of 10CFR2.206 Process ML20045D8321993-06-11011 June 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 54, FSAR Update Submittals. ML20044F3271993-05-21021 May 1993 Comments on Draft NRC Insp Procedure 38703, Commercial Grade Procurement Insp, Fr Vol 58,Number 52.NRC Should Use EPRI Definitions for Critical Characteristics ML20044D3311993-05-0404 May 1993 Comment Supporting Proposed Generic Communication Re Mod of TS Administrative Control Requirements for Emergency & Security Plans ML20056C0831993-03-19019 March 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Petitioners Motion to Stay Issuance of Full Power License.* Licensee Urges NRC to Reject Petitioners Motion & to Deny Petitioners Appeal of 921215 Order.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20056C1881993-03-17017 March 1993 Order.* Directs Util to Respond to Motion by COB 930319 & NRC to Respond by COB 930322.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930317 ML20128F6221993-02-0303 February 1993 Transcript of 930203 Affirmation/Discussion & Vote Public Meeting in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-2.Related Info Encl ML20128D9651993-02-0303 February 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Stay Request Filed by Petitioners Denied.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930203 ML20128D4651993-02-0202 February 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Meet Heavy Burden Imposed on Party.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D3391993-02-0202 February 1993 Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioners Specific Requests Listed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D6321993-01-29029 January 1993 Memorandum & Order.* Denies Citizens for Fair Util Regulation for Fr Notice Hearing on Proposed Issuance of OL for Facility.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930129 ML20128D3461993-01-29029 January 1993 NRC Staff Notification of Issuance of OL for Facility.* Low Power License May Be Issued by 930201.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D6111993-01-26026 January 1993 Joint Affidavit of I Barnes & Ft Grubelich Re Borg-Warner Check Valves.* Discusses Issues Re Borg-Warner Check Valves Raised by Cfur & Adequacy of Actions Taken by TU Electric 1999-06-18
[Table view] Category:PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20056C0831993-03-19019 March 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Petitioners Motion to Stay Issuance of Full Power License.* Licensee Urges NRC to Reject Petitioners Motion & to Deny Petitioners Appeal of 921215 Order.Motion Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D4651993-02-0202 February 1993 Texas Utils Electric Co Response to Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioner Request Should Be Denied Based on Failure to Meet Heavy Burden Imposed on Party.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128D3391993-02-0202 February 1993 Emergency Motion to Stay Issuance of low-power Ol.* Petitioners Specific Requests Listed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127L9091993-01-25025 January 1993 Tx Util Electric Response to Citizens for Fair Util Regulation Request of 930113.* Request Fails to Raise Worthy Issue & Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G9441993-01-19019 January 1993 TU Electric Brief in Opposition to Petitioners Appeal of ASLB Memorandum & Order.* Requests That Petitioners Appeal Be Denied & Licensing Board 921215 Memorandum & Order Be Affirmed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G7451993-01-14014 January 1993 NRC Staff Response to Motion of Petitioners RM Dow & SL Dow, (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station),For Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127G7941993-01-12012 January 1993 Opposition of TU Electric to Motion for Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow (Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station) & RM Dow.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A6131993-01-0707 January 1993 Motion for Leave to File Out of Time & Request for Extension of Time to File Brief.* Petitioners Did Not Receive Order in Time to Appeal & Requests 15 Day Extension from Motion Filing Date to Respond.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A7911992-12-31031 December 1992 Petitioner Amended Motion for Continuance to File Appeal Brief.* Petitioners Requests Until C.O.B. on 930108 to File Appeal Brief.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127A7641992-12-30030 December 1992 Petitioner Motion for Continuance to File Appeal Brief.* Counsel Requests That Petitioners Be Granted Until 930109 to File Brief in Support of Notice of Appeal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128C9751992-12-0303 December 1992 NRC Staff Response to Motion to Compel Disclosure of Info Secreted by Restrictive Agreements & Notification of Addl Evidence Supporting Petition to Intervene by B Orr,D Orr, J Macktal & Hasan.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20128B8721992-11-27027 November 1992 NRC Staff Response to Motion for Rehearing by RM Dow, Petitioner.* Motion for Rehearing Should Be Denied for Reasons Explained in Encl.W/Certificate of Svc ML20128A0271992-11-25025 November 1992 Texas Utilities Electric Co Answer to Motion to Compel Disclosure of Info Secreted by Restrictive Agreements.* Util Requests That Petitioners 921118 Motion to Compel Be Denied in Entirety.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20127P8181992-11-25025 November 1992 Texas Utilities Electric Co Answer to Notification of Addl Evidence Supporting Petition to Intervene.* Petitioners Notification Procedurally Improper & Substantively Improper & Should Be Rejected by Board.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116M4591992-11-19019 November 1992 TU Electric Opposition to Motion for Rehearing by RM Dow.* RM Dow 921110 Motion for Rehearing Should Be Denied.W/ Certificate of Svc ML20127M4271992-11-15015 November 1992 Motion to Compel Disclosure of Info Secreted by Restrictive Agreements.* Petitioners Bi Orr,Di Orr,Jj Macktal & SMA Hasan Requests That Board Declare Null & Void Any & All Provisions in Settlement Agreements.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116M3181992-11-10010 November 1992 Motion for Prehearing by RM Dow,Petitioner.* Requests Period of Ten Days to File Supplemental Pleading to Original Petition.Certificate of Svc & Statement Encl ML20106D8881992-10-0808 October 1992 Opposition of Util to Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow Doing Business as Disposbale Workers of Plant & RM Dow.* Request for Extension of Time & to Become Party to Proceeding Should Be Rejected.W/Certificate of Svc ML20106D2821992-10-0505 October 1992 Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief by SL Dow Doing Business as Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station & RM Dow.* Petitioner Requests 30-day Extension.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101P5891992-06-30030 June 1992 Response of Texas Utils Electric to Comments of Cap Rock Electric Cooperative,Inc. Dispute Strictly Contractual Issue Involving Cap Rock Efforts to Annul Reasonable Notice Provisions of 1990 Power Supply Agreement ML20101K1131992-06-29029 June 1992 Motion for Leave to Suppl Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas & Supplemental Info.* OI Policy Unfair & Violative of Subpoenaed Individuals Statutory Rights & Goes Beyond Investigatory Authority.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101G2041992-06-18018 June 1992 Motion to Modify or Quash Subpoenas.* Requests Mod of Subpoenas Due to Manner in Which Ofc of Investigations Seeks to Enforce Is Unreasonable & Fails to Protect Statutory Rights of Subpoenaed Individuals.W/Certificate of Svc ML20127K8141992-05-19019 May 1992 Request to Institute Proceeding to Modify,Suspend or Revoke License Held by Util for Unit 1 & for Cause Would Show Commission That Primary Place of Registration for Organization Is Fort Worth,Tarrant County,Tx ML20096A6281992-05-0707 May 1992 Applicants Reply to Opposition cross-motions for Summary Disposition & Responses to Applicants Motion for Summary Disposition.* Applicants Conclude NRC Has No Authority to Retain Antitrust Licensing Conditions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20095C4691992-04-17017 April 1992 TU Electric Answer to Application for Hearings & Oral Argument by M Dow & SL Dow.* Concludes That NRC Should Deny Application for Oral Argument & Hearings on Petition to Intervene & Motion to Reopen.W/Certificate of Svc ML20091E2561992-04-0606 April 1992 Application to Secretary for Hearings & Oral Argument in Support of Motion for Leave to Intervene out-of-time & Motion to Reopen Record Submitted by SL Dow Dba Disposable Workers of Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station & RM Dow.* ML20094K4161992-03-16016 March 1992 TU Electric Answer to Petition to Intervene & Motion & Supplemental Motion to Reopen by M Dow & SL Dow & TU Electric Request for Admonition of Dows.* Concludes That Motion Should Be Dismissed.W/Certificate of Svc ML20091A0461992-03-13013 March 1992 Suppl to Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests That NRC Reopen Record & Suspend License Pending New Hearings on Issue. W/Certificate of Svc ML20090C4241992-02-24024 February 1992 Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests That NRC Reopen Record & Suspend OL for Unit 1 & CP for Unit 2,pending Reopening & Final Decision.W/Certificate of Svc ML20090C4431992-02-21021 February 1992 Petition for Leave to Intervene Out of Time.* Requests That Petition for Leave to Intervene Out of Time Be Granted for Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc ML20116F2671992-02-19019 February 1992 Requests NRC to Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility ML20094E9511992-02-10010 February 1992 Requests That NRC Initiate Swift & Effective Actions to Cause Licensee to Immediately Revoke All Escorted Access to Facility & to Adequately Train All Util Employees in Use of Rev 3 to Work Process Program ML20086Q3121991-12-26026 December 1991 Case Motion for Leave to File Response to Portions of Motion of R Micky & Dow to Reopen Record.* Requests That NRC Recognize J Ellis as Case Representative for Filing & Pleading Purposes.W/Limited Notice of Appearance ML20086Q3811991-12-26026 December 1991 Case Response to Portions of Motion of R Micky & Dow to Reopen Record.* Submits Responses to Motions to Reopen Record ML20091G2511991-12-0202 December 1991 Licensee Answer to Motion to Reopen Record by M Dow & SL Dow.* Requests That Petitioners Motion Be Denied for Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc & Notices of Appearance ML20086G7381991-11-22022 November 1991 Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests That Licensing Board Reopen Record & Grant Leave to File Motion to Intervene. W/Certificate of Svc ML20006C4811990-02-0101 February 1990 Applicant Answer to Request for Stay by Citizens for Fair Util Regulation (Cfur).* Cfur Failed to Satisfy Burden to Demonstrate Necessity for Stay & Request Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20006B1691990-01-27027 January 1990 Second Request for Stay Citizens for Fail Util Regulation.* Requests That NRC Stay Fuel Loading & Low Power Operation of Unit 1 Until 900209.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20006A0281990-01-0808 January 1990 J Corder Response to NRC Staff Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Requests Protective Order Until NRC Makes Documents Available to Corder by FOIA or Directly.W/Certificate of Svc ML20005G1431989-12-11011 December 1989 Motion to Modify Subpoena & Motion for Protective Order.* Protective Order Requested on Basis That Subpoena Will Impose Undue Financial Hardship on J Corder ML20248J3601989-10-15015 October 1989 Request for Stay Citizens for Fair Util Regulation.* Requests That Commission Retain Authority to Order That Fuel Loading & Low Power License Not Be Immediately Effective,Per Util Intent to Request License.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20246B8671989-08-17017 August 1989 Motion for Reconsideration of NRC Memorandum & Order CLI-89-14.* NRC Should Excuse Itself from Consideration on Matters Re Jj Macktal & Should Refer All Issues on NRC Requested Subpoena to Independent Adjudicatory Body ML20248D6291989-08-0202 August 1989 Jj Macktal Statement Re Motion for Recusation.* Macktal Motion Considered Moot Due to Commission No Longer Having Jurisdiction to Consider Motion Since Macktal Not Party to Proceeding Before Nrc.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247Q3851989-07-26026 July 1989 Withdrawal of Motion to Reopen Record.* Withdraws 890714 Motion to Reopen Record.W/Certificate of Svc ML20245J7331989-07-26026 July 1989 Request of Cap Rock for Reevaluation of Director'S Determination That No Significant Changes in Licensee Activity Warrant Antitrust Review at OL Stage.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20247B5901989-07-19019 July 1989 Motion to Reopen Record.* Requests Board to Reopen Record & Grant Leave to Renew Earlier Motion for Intervention Status. W/Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc ML20248D5541989-07-0303 July 1989 Motion for Recusation.* Requests That NRC Recuse from Deciding on Macktal Cases on Basis That NRC Will Not Be Fair & Impartial Tribunal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20248D5731989-07-0303 July 1989 Motion for Reconsideration.* Requests Reconsideration of NRC 890122 Order on Basis That NRC Subpoena Filed for Improper Purposes & NRC Lacks Jurisdiction Over Matters Presently Before Dept of Labor ML20245J9411989-06-30030 June 1989 Response of Texas Utils Electric Co to Request of Cap Rock Electric Cooperative,Inc,For Order Enforcing & Modifying Antitrust License Conditions ML20248D4891989-06-13013 June 1989 Motion for Protective Order.* Requests That Jj Macktal Deposition Be Taken at Stated Address in Washington,Dc & That Testimony Remain Confidential.W/Certificate of Svc 1993-03-19
[Table view] |
Text
-
pac PUBLIC DOCIBEM IQd y , 'b g A,
-i#
!b 4%?
- & .r /f :- i UNIT"D STATES OF AMERICA ~
% 8 NUCLEAh REGULATORY COMMISSION h **
//
S BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD 0 0 In the Matter of: )
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, ) NRC DOCKET NOS. 50-498A THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, THE CITY ) 50-499A OF AUSTIN, and CENTRAL POWER AND )
LIGHT COMPANY )
(South Texas Project, Unit Nos. )
1 and 2) )
)
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY,)
ET AL. ) NRC DOCKET NOS. 50-445A IComanche Peak Steam Electric ) 50-446A Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2) )
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Central and South West Corporation, Central and South West Services, Inc., Central Power and Light Company
(" CPL"), West Texas Utilities Company, Public Service Com-pany of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company (collectively "the Movants"), pursuant to 10 C.F.R., Sections 2.740(c) and 2.790(b)(6), move for the issuance of a Protec-tive Order (attached hereto) concerning the public disclosure of certain documents and information which Movants have been requested to produce or disclose by the Public Utilities Board of Brownsville, Texas (" PUB").
1347 177 s, t 7911160 _ D
^
On or about February 28, 1979, CPL moved for the issuance of a Protective Order 1 with respect to certain documents and information requested by PUB on January 3, 1979.
In addition, on March 14, 1979, PUB applied for the issuance of subpoenas requesting the production of documents by Movants (with the exception of CPL). The application was denied, but the Board directed that Movants (other than CPL) comply with PUB's reasonable discovery requests. Since that time Movants have produced a number of documents to PUB and are prepared to produce the remainder.
CPL has produced for inspection all of the documents requested of it and has copied a number of those documents for the PUB.
The documents which have been produced by Movants to date have been produced under informal agreement with counsel for the PUB as to the treatment to be accorded those documents considered by Movants as " confidential". This production was also made during the period of time negotia-tiens were being , sued with counsel for the PUB concerning
-1/ Central Power and Light Company's Objections and Motion for Protective Order Regarding Certain of the Inter-rogatories and Requests for Production of Documents from the Public Utilities Board of the City of Browns-ville, filed with this Board on or about February 28, 1979. The Board has not ruled on this Motion.
134/ l/8
the terms of an appropriate protective order.1/ These nego-tiations have been extensive and time-consuming and, ulti-mately, unproductive. Only last week, counsel for Movants, in a final effort to resolve the impasse, advised counsel for the PUB that Movants would be willing to enter into a Protective Order providing for confidential treatment identical to that previously ordered by this Board on April 9, 1979 with respect to production of documents by Houston Lighting & Power Company to the PUB. See Attachment "A". Counsel for PUB has refused that offer. Movants now request that this Board enter a Protective Order identical in substance to that entered on April 9, 1979. A copy of the Protective Order which Movants now request this Board to enter is attached hereto.
Movants allege that the following categories of documents or information requested by PUB relate to or contain information of a confidential or proprietary natured
-2/ The Movants and PUB have agreed on the classes of documents to be accorded confidential treatment.
The only issues relate to the nature of the con-fidential treatment.
3/
~ See the Affidavit of W. C. Price, Vice-President of CPL, which accompanied CPL's Objections and Motion for Protective Order Regarding Certain of the Inter-rogatories and Requests for Production of Documents from PUB.
f[h
which, if disclosed, could seriously. impair Movants' indi-vidual and respective relationships with existing or potential customers and suppliers of fuel, and adversely and substan-tially affect Movants' respective competitive positions, and which should therefore be subject to the attached Pro-tective Order:
(a) All documents and information referring or relating to or setting forth (i) current efforts or activities by any Movant to encourage any indus-trial concern to locate, expand or retain a plant or other facility in the service territory of any Movant, and (ii) the particular industrial concern's response to such efforts or activities; (b) All documents and information referring or relating to or setting forth the rates or other terms and conditions which any Movant has offered to any industrial concern within the past 5 years, or under which any Movant now supplies electric service to any industrial concern; (c) All documents and information referring or relating to or setting forth the current or future terms and conditions of gas or other fuel supply to any Movant, including entitlements, ownership inter-ests or any other form of control of or access to gas or other fuel.
I347 180
WHEREFORE, Movants respectfully request that this S
Board enter the Protective Order attached hereto.
Respectfully submitted, ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE By , Z;dd Attorneys for Central and South West Corporation, et al.
Isham, Lincoln & Beale 1050 17th Street, N.W.
Suite 701 '
Washington, D.C. 20036 '
Dated: October 16, 1979 134/ 18I
na %
N 1, a
me ep)<?<0 -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA b c NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
% T GM BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of: )
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, ) NRC DOCKET NOS. 50-498A THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, THE CITY ) 50-499A OF AUSTIN, and CENTRAL POWER AND )
LIGHT COMPANY )
(South Texas Project, Unit Nos. )
1 and 2) )
)
TEXAS UTILITIES GENERATING COMPANY,)
ET AL. ) NRC DOCKET NOS. 50-445A (Comanche Peak Steam Electric ) 50-446A Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2) )
PROTECTIVE ORDER On January 3, 1979, the Public Utilities Board of Brownsville, Texas (" PUB") filed its Initial Interrogatories to and First Request for Production of Documents by Central Power & Light Company (" CPL"). In response, CPL filed Objections to and Motion for Protective Order alleging, inter ala, that certain matters inquired into by the PUB Interrogatories and certain documents requested by the PUB Request for Production relate to or contain information which is of a confidential or proprietary nature, the re-lease or disclosure of which to third parties could seri-ously impair CPL's respective relationships with existing or potential customers or jeopardize CPL's competitive.
position.
134/ l82
Further, this Board has directed CPL's affiliated companies to comply with reasonable discovery requests of PUB. PUB, accordingly, has requested the production of documents by Central and South West Corporation, Central and South West Services, Inc., West Texas Utilities Company, Public Service Company of Oklahoma and Southwestern Electric Power Company (collectively, with CPL, "the Movants"). The Movants have filed contemporaneously herewith a Motion for Protective Order concerning the public disclosure of certain documents and information which the Movants have been re-quested to produce or disclose by PUB. Some of the documents and information requested by PUB may relate to or contain information which is of a confidential or proprietary nature, the release or disclosure of which to third parties could seriously impair the Movants' respective relationships with existing or potential customers or jeopardize the Movants' competitive position.
WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the following cate-gories of documents 1I and information may be confidential and shall be subjcet to the restrictions contained in para-graphs one throusn eight following:
-1/ As used in this Protective Order the term " documents" shall have the same meaning as ascribed to it in PUB's Initial Interrogatories to and First Request for Produc-tion of Documents by CPL.
lh3
(a) All documents and information referring or relating to or setting forth (i) current efforts or activities by any Movant to encourage any industrial con-cern to locate, expand or retain a plant or other facil-ity in the service territory of any Movant, and (ii) the particular industrial concern's response to such efforts or activities; (b) All documents and information referring or relating to or setting forth the rates or other terms and conditions which any Movant has offered to ,any industrial concern within the past 5 years, or under which any Movant now supplies electric service to any industrial concern; (c) All documents and information referring or relating to or setting forth the current or future terms and conditions of gas or other fuel supply to any Movant, including entitlements, ownership interests or any other form of control of or access to gas or other fuel.
- 1. Confidential documents and information therein shall not be disclosed to any person other than (a) counsel for parties to this proceeding, including necessary secre-tarial, paralegal and clerical personnel assisting such counsel; (b) independent consultants and technical experts and their staff who are engaged directly in this litigation; (c) qualified court reporters involved in reporting matters in this litigation; and (d) the Commission, the Board, the presiding of ficer or Commission's Staf f.
1347 i84
- 2. Confidential documents and information con-tained therein shall not be made available to any person designated in 1(b) unless they shall have first read this order and shall have agreed, in writing (a) to be bound by the terms thereof, (b) not to reveal such confidential docu-ment or information to anyone other than another person designated in paragraph 1, and (c) to utilize such con-fidential documents and information solely for the purposes of this proceeding.
- 3. If the Commission or the Board orders that access to or dissemination of confidential documents and information contained therein as defined above shall be made to persons not included in paragraph 1 above, such matter shall be accessible to, or disseminated to, such persons based upon the conditions pertaining to, and the cbligations arising from this order, and such persons shall be considered subhecttoit.
- 4. Any portion of a transcript in connection with this proceeding containing any confidential documents or in-formation contained therein shall be bound separately and filed under seal. When any confidential documents or infor-mation contained therein are included in an authorized tran-script of a deposition or exhibits thereto, arrangements shall be made with the court reporter taking the deposition to bind such confidential portions and separately label them 134/ I85
"(MOVANT) CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION, SUBJECT TO PROTEC-TIVE ORDER." Before a court reporter receives any such document or information, he or she shall have first read this Order and shall have agreed in writing to be bound by the terms thereof.
- 5. Any confidential document or information defined above is to be treated as such within the meaning of 5 U.S.C.
S 552(b)(4) and 18 U.S.C. S 1905, subject to a final ruling, after notice, by the Commission, Board, the presiding officer, or the Commission's Freedom of Information Act Officer to the contrary, or by appeal of such a ruling, interlocutory or otherwise.
- 6. If confidential documents or information are
, disclosed to any person other than in the manner authorized by this Protective Order, the person responsible for the dis-closure must immediately bring all pertinent facts relating to such disclosure to the attention of counsel for MOVANTS and the presiding officer and, without prejudice to other rights and remedies of MOVANTS, make every effort to prevent further disclosure by counsel or by the person to whom the document or information was communicated.
- 7. Nothing in this Order shall affect the admis-sibility into evidence of confidential documents or informa-tion defined above, or abridge the right of any person to seek judicial review or to pursue other appropriate judicial 1347 186
action with respect to any ruling made by the Commission, its Freedom of Information Act Officer, the Board or the presiding officer concerning the issue of the status of confidential business information.
- 8. Upon final termination of this proceeding, each person that is subject to this Order shall assemble and return to counsel for MOVANTS all confidential documents and information contained therein, including all copies of such matter which may have been made, but not including copies containing notes or other attorney's work-product that may have been placed thereon by counsel for the receiving party. All copies containing notes or other attorney's work-product shall be destroyed. This paragraph shall not apply to the Commission, the Board, the presiding officer or the Commis-sion's Staff, which shall retain such material pursuant to statutory requirements and for other record keeping purposes, but may destroy those additional copies in its possession which it regards as surplusage.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Dated at Bethesda, Maryland this day of l34[ }8[
____