05000272/LER-1979-056-01, /01T-0:on 790831,tests on RHR Sys Indicated Pump Flow Exceeded Design Runout Flow.Design Change Will Increase RHR Flow Resistance by Resizing Orifices in Flow Elements Upstream & Downstream of Heat Exchanger

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML19208B010)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/01T-0:on 790831,tests on RHR Sys Indicated Pump Flow Exceeded Design Runout Flow.Design Change Will Increase RHR Flow Resistance by Resizing Orifices in Flow Elements Upstream & Downstream of Heat Exchanger
ML19208B010
Person / Time
Site: Salem 
Issue date: 09/14/1979
From: Kapple A
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19208B008 List:
References
LER-79-056-01T, LER-79-56-1T, NUDOCS 7909180417
Download: ML19208B010 (2)


LER-1979-056, /01T-0:on 790831,tests on RHR Sys Indicated Pump Flow Exceeded Design Runout Flow.Design Change Will Increase RHR Flow Resistance by Resizing Orifices in Flow Elements Upstream & Downstream of Heat Exchanger
Event date:
Report date:
2721979056R01 - NRC Website

text

~

Report Number:

79-56/0lT Report Date:

9/14/79 Occurrence Date:

8/31/79 Facility:

Salem Generating Station Public Service Electric & Gas Company Hancock's Bridge, New Jersey 08038 IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE:

RHR Pump Exceeds Design Runout Flow CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE:

Operational Mode 5 DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE:

In response to a NRC question on Salem Unit 2 regarding RHR Pump NPSH during post-LOCA recirculation mode, a Unit 2 RHR Pump was tested for This the highest runout flow for the worst hydraulic configuration.

two configuration is when one RHR Pump is feeding two charging pumps, safety injections pumps and also directly into two cold legs.

Test results indicated that the RHR Pump flow exceeded the design runout flow.

Since the RHR Pump is required to operate under LOCA conditions, the RHR piping configuration existing on Salem Unit 1, which is iden-tical to Unit 2, is unacceptable.

DESIGNATION OF APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE:

As indicated by the Unit 2 test results, it would appear that the Unit 1 RHR System flow resistance is low and the pump would runcut under the accident mode of operation.

AMALYSIS OF OCCURRENCE:

The Engineering Department evaluation of this condition will be sub-mitted in a supplemental report.

CORRECTIVE ACTION

A Design Change is in preparation by the Engineering Department which would increase the system flow resistance by resizing the orifices on the flow elements upstream and downstream of the RHR heat exchangers.

The Design Change has been accepted by Westinghouse.

The estimated time to make this change is approximately three weexs and should be completed during the present outage.

FAILURE DATA:

Not Applicable g gg],jg Prepared by A.W.

Kapple

/

Manager - Saldm Generating Station SORC Meeting No.

70-79 7 0 09180 6't:7

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATURT GUMMiniure NRC FO'HM 366 ~

(7 77)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CCNTRCL SLCCX: l l

I I

l

\\

lh (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

l N IJ I S l G l 5 l 1 l@l 0 l Ol I O I O I OI O I O I - 10 l 0 l@l 4 I 1 l 1 l 1 l 1 l@l l

l@

0 l1 F

$ 9 UCENSEE ;;01 14 16 LICENSE NwueER

5 26 uCENSE ivet a 51 ;ar sd Cit lL l ol 5 l 01010121712 @l 018 } 3 l 11719 @l0 i 911 I 4 l7 l 9 l@

CON"'

aE CR 74 75 mE*0a7 34 1 da g nc 64 es eve %T ca:E 60 si coCxET NLusta 7

8 EVENT DESCRIPTION ANQ PRC8 ABLE CCNSECUENCES h

}In response to a NRC cuestion on Salem Unit 2 regarding PER Pump NPSH during post-l Ai:

io 3 ILCCA operation, tests performed on Unit 2 RHR System indicated the F R Pump flow I

ola lexceeded the desian runout flow.

Since Unit I has an identical conficuration as I

oi5 l Unit 2, this unacceptable condition exists on Unit 1.

Engineering Department is l

'tted.

This is the

(

Ievaluatina this condition and a supolemental recort will be sube c i6 l

it i first occurrence of this tvee.

I 3.e f

43 7

.9 COvP vatvE SYSTEM

CAUSE

CALSE COCE COOE SLOC00E COM*CNENT OOCE SL8COCE SLa000E Ic ir l@ U@ I A l@ Iz Iz I z I zlz I zl@ Iz l@ 12 l@

assi 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 la 19

.0 R EV'5IO N SE OUE NTI AL CC;ymmENCE REPORT

, ENTYEAA REPORT NO.

COOE TYPE NC.

@ y*gr a gg17 l 91 l-l 10 l 516 l l/l i O l 11 l Tl l-l W

EV EQ'; _;'

22

J
a.
6 27 IS 29 JJ 31 J;

AT* aCwM E NT N8 m DJ

  1. A YE COUP 00V80NEN?

TAKEN ACT:CN CNFLANT WET *=CO MCL83 h

SL8v:T*ED FCAM WB SL Pe'.:E" VANysAcT;mga ACTION suTumE E8KE0'

$wuTDCwN irl@lzl@

l zl@

lzl@

I 0101010 I lY l@

l N l@

lL ]@

l zl 919l9l@

c.:

Ja as

6 2,

'O di 42 AJ

't 47 cat SE CESCRI' TION AND CCA AECTtvE ACTICNS h i

i,4 l It is evident by test results that the PRR S / stem flow resistance is 10w.

A Design

[

flow eierents I

l Chance to increase ficw resistance by resi:ine the orifices in the i-

} upstream and downstream of the heat exchanger is in preparation. Estimated time to

{

r,>

l

t ] corplete this change is three weeks.

1 isi {

a3 a 9 M

VE? WOO O8 sTarus secaEa OTHEm starts v'y Cis::v E a

  • ciscov Env :Escoe:N
  1. aO:vW I Gj@ l 010 I Ol@l N/A l

lCl@l Test to respond to NRC cuestion l

' !5 A C*iV I TY CONTENT LOCAT!CN 08 85LE A31 agtgAsg OpmE' EASE AMOUNT 05 AO*1vtTV

' m i z l @ tz_J@i m

i Na i

4 6J as 45 S 9 1C 11

'E 8 50NN E t. E li'OSLDES NLusta TY8E OES mipT1cN.

l010l0l@lzl@l N/A j

I1 1' 4 9 11

'2 13

  • E850NNE. '%;m ES N.vsta Ots;miPvCN l

!*I O!OIO N/A g guas -

1 a.

il q.,,

4 g, y y [ ay L:ti ts ca cavAct T: saciu v

,3

'**E O E S:n.* *.ON l

t il l 21@l N/A N

LEE 2*

33,g Ogs i

i iiiiiiiiiiii n m us :m p* 0N NeA 63 69 7

4 2

C W-3 W.

Kapple PwCNE NAME Cp PnEP A AE A C10