ML18355A747
| ML18355A747 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/2018 |
| From: | Hawkens E Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-250-SLR, 50-251-SLR, ASLBP 18-957-01-SLR-BD01, RAS 54718 | |
| Download: ML18355A747 (8) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Dr. Sue H. Abreu In the Matter of Docket Nos. 50-250-SLR and 50-251-SLR FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ASLBP No. 18-957-01-SLR-BD01 (Turkey Point Units 3 and 4) December 21, 2018 ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
Before this Board in the above captioned proceeding is a joint motion submitted by the oral argument participantsFlorida Power and Light Co.; Southern Alliance for Clean Energy; Friends of the Earth, Inc., Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Miami Waterkeeper, Inc.; and the NRC Staffrequesting that certain corrections be made to the transcript of the December 4, 2018 oral argument concerning contention admissibility. See Joint Motion for the Correction of the Transcript of the Oral Argument Held on December 4, 2018 (Dec. 20, 2018). Given that all parties agree on the proposed corrections, this Board adopts those corrections. The transcript of the oral argument held on December 4, 2018 is hereby revised per Appendix A to this Order.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD
/RA/
E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland December 21, 2018
APPENDIX A CORRECTIONS TO THE TRANSCRIPT OF THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON DECEMBER 4, 2018 (DOCKET NOS. 50-250-SLR AND 50-251-SLR)
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker December 4, 2018 12 11 202-739-5733 (O'Neill) 713-890-5710 (ONeill) N/A 13 9 Shwerwin.turk@nrc.gov Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov N/A JeremyWachutka@nrc.gov Esther.Houseman@nrc.gov 14 7 Ken Rumelt, ESQ. Kenneth Rumelt, ESQ. N/A 14 9 University of Vermont Law School Vermont Law School N/A Environmental and Natural Resources Law Clinic 14 10 164 Chelsea St. P.O. Box 96, 164 Chelsea St. N/A 20 20 Dr. --- Turk 24 20 say, you can says you can Curran 24 21 doesnt it use But doesnt use Curran 28 4 renewal GEIS, but renewal GEIS. But Curran 33 23 right now? right now. Curran 37 14 their mind their minds Turk 45 23 initial or subsequent initial or subsequent Turk 45 24 initial initial Turk 47 25 simply simple Turk 53 5 (c)(2) 51.53(c)(2) Turk 53 20 I would negate I would not negate Turk 59 5 51.53(c)(3) Table B-1 applies 51.53(c)(3) and Table B-1 apply ONeill 62 21 CLI-0110 CLI-01-10 ONeill 76 14 SRMSECY-14-0016 SRM-SECY-14-0016 Curran 80 12 no new Curran 81 2 SOR applications either SLR applications here Curran 81 24 crocodiles, third, crocodiles. Third, Curran 81 25 we are intended we intended Curran 83 6 purview that purview the Curran 84 7 here is here Curran 85 12 usually mutually Curran 94 12 CCIS CCS Curran 103 5 from for Curran 105 10 evidence by evidenced by ONeill 105 16 impacts impact ONeill 106 11 state EPA ability state EPA delegee ONeill 107 3 second guessing the terminations second guessing the determinations ONeill 107 19 discussed really discussed fully ONeill 107 22 current status under the CCS current status of the CCS ONeill 107 25 regulators have acquired of FPL regulators have required of FPL ONeill 108 4 mitigation ledgers mitigation measures ONeill
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 108 6-8 interaction between FPL, in the state interaction between FPL and the state ONeill and local county regulators have and local county regulators that has occurred occurred 108 10 even in even an ONeill 108 24 confides of the permit confines of the permit Judge Abreu 109 5 mitigation ledgers mitigation measures ONeill 111 14 the nuke well field the Newton well field ONeill 111 16 Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority as a Florida Keys Aqueduct Authority well ONeill well field field 112 21 containment discharges contaminant discharges Judge Abreu 115 12-13 not a water quality violation, that was not a water quality violation that was Hamrick caused caused 116 14 our par ONeill 116 19-20 really from the kind of the 2015 to really from the 2015 to 2017 ONeill 2017 standpoint. timeframe.
118 16 technics techniques ONeill 118 20 bolder formulation Boulder Formation ONeill 119 12-13 I think that's a Safe Drinking Water I think that's a Safe Drinking Water ONeill Act, if I recall. Act limit, if I recall.
120 25 could act commutatively could act cumulatively ONeill 121 12 mitigation ledgers mitigation measures ONeill 121 14 and some thoughts too at some expense too ONeill 122 5 litigation ledgers mitigation measures ONeill 122 8 litigation measures mitigation measures ONeill 122 14-15 I think the we be more for instance. I think the Levy Board, for instance. ONeill 122 24 available technical available technology ONeill 125 2 tritium levels nutrient levels ONeill 125 4 litigation ledgers mitigation measures ONeill 126 16 use views Houseman 126 20 1. The One, the Houseman 126 21 B1 B-1 Houseman 127 5 Commissions roles Commissions rules Houseman 127 7 51.53(c) (iii) 51.53(c)(3) Houseman 127 7 Table B1 Table B-1 Houseman 127 16 governments governments Houseman 127 18 licenses licensees Houseman 128 8 SACEs counsels SACE Counsels Houseman 129 5 operation, the operation of the Houseman 129 8 prospectively respectively Houseman 129 12 Notable Notably Houseman 129 13 Note 35 Note 38 Houseman 129 14-15 Footnote 35 Footnote 38 Houseman 130 16 what SACE does not SACE does not Houseman 130 25 FTPs the FDEPs Houseman 131 2 hyper-saline hypersaline Houseman 131 15 irregularity regularity Houseman 133 1 consent order a consent order Houseman 133 23 nearly merely Houseman
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 133 23 tritium and tritium in Houseman 134 12 tone tome Houseman 135 1 would like I would like Houseman 135 10 NRCs NRC Houseman 135 20 water use complex. water use conflicts. Houseman 136 2 Staffs Staffs Houseman 136 4 sometimes sometime Houseman 136 7 service surface Houseman 136 8 peer speculation on SACEs mere speculation on SACEs Houseman 136 9 SACEs SACEs Houseman 136 10 on the CCS of the CCS Houseman 137 3 effects affects Houseman 138 2 issues. Including issues, including Houseman 138 3 D sites DSEIS Houseman 138 15 DERMs DERMs Houseman 140 7 NEPAs permit NPDES permit Houseman 140 10 hyper-saline Hypersaline Houseman 141 14 NEPA permit NPDES permit Houseman 142 1 for moment for that moment Houseman 142 22 decline declines Houseman 145 14 D size simulator and F size (phonetic). DSEIS and similarly an FSEIS. Houseman 145 16 B.1 B-1 Houseman 145 18 B.1 B-1 Houseman 145 19 B.1 B-1 Houseman 145 22 F size (phonetic). FSEIS. Houseman 145 24 B.1 B-1 Judge Abreu 146 3 B.1 B-1 Judge Abreu 146 22 B.1 B-1 Houseman 147 5 underlining underlying Houseman 147 6 B.1 B-1 Houseman 147 13 Its Its Houseman 148 7 it is cited Vermont Yankee, Pilgrim it cited Vermont Yankee/Pilgrim Houseman 148 12 B.1 B-1 Houseman 150 5 B.1 B-1 Houseman 151 7 B.1 B-1 Turk 151 15 B.1 B-1 Turk 151 19 B.1 B-1 Turk 151 21 get passed get past Judge Abreu 152 6 B.1 B-1 Turk 152 17 Table 1 Table B-1 Judge Abreu 155 9 nuisance to GEIS new since the GEIS Judge Abreu 157 12 looking at, looking at it, Turk 157 15 to NEPA in NEPA Turk 158 10 litigation mitigation Turk 159 1 we look we looked Turk 160 15-16 here are the - but, for instance here are the impacts, for instance Turk the temperature, the gradients that the temperature gradients that exist Turk 160 16-17 exists
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 161 10 that they that Turk 161 16 as one is not one Turk 162 24 5195(c) or 5171(d) 51.95(c) or 51.71(d) Turk 166 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 3 Curran 172 6 between between us Curran 172 13 move off goof off Curran 172 21 agreement is agreement -- is Curran 185 6 standard is is the alternative standard is: Is the alternative Ayres 185 11-12 We pointed to two authorities on the We pointed to two authorities on the Ayers authorities pointIm sorryon the alternatives point.
alternatives point.
185 25 both sentences. both senses. Ayers 186 23 So we think that that is So we think that reasonableness is Ayers 187 2 those words were used, that word was used, Ayers 187 9 So one side, So on one side, Ayers 197 6 cooling tower. cooling canals. Rumelt 201 15 Mr. ONeill Mr. Bessette R. Lighty 206 8 positive dispositive R. Lighty 217 22 our contention their contention Turk 218 16 benefit to benefit compared to Turk 221 14 cooling system cooling canal system Turk 222 8-9 concluded the staff concluded, the staff Turk 222 15 with groundwater - with saltwater with saltwater Turk 222 16 in the GEIS in the GEIS. Turk 223 10 cooling ponds and salt marshes cooling ponds in salt marshes Turk 223 20 there is no impact on - or there is a there is a small impact on Turk small impact on 223 22 this is the same This is the same Turk 224 1 conclusion. conclusion. Turk 225 9 impacts of impacts on Wachutka 227 9 the third issue a material issue Wachutka 227 13 the affected environment, Chapter 3 the affected environment is in Wachutka Chapter 3 228 18 the alleged valor the alleged failure Wachutka 228 19 cooling tower cooling canal Wachutka 230 12 This argue, This argument, Wachutka 230 15 its licenses its permits Wachutka 232 6 this agency has these agencies have Houseman 232 17 The consent order, the consent The consent order and consent Houseman agreement agreement 233 3 SEIS SACE Houseman 234 14 Joint Petitioner has Joint Petitioners have Houseman 234 15 thermal thermal, Houseman 234 16 applied aquatic Houseman 234 17 applied aquatic Houseman 234 19 51.53(c) (3) i 51.53(c)(3)(ii) Houseman 235 5 mitigation Mitigation Houseman 235 6 effective affected Houseman
Page Line Now Reads Should Read Speaker 235 11-12 is expected. is extracted. Houseman 237 9 same analysis, SAMA analysis, Houseman Section 18 51.53(c)(3), Roman numeral Section 51.53(c)(3)(ii)(L). Houseman 238 8-9 IIL.
240 10 you are then referred up to you then refer it up to Turk 242 13 contention and contention Houseman 244 1 credible federal Houseman 246 15 In the hearing process, In the hearing process, Turk 246 15 In the hearing process In the hearing process Turk 246 18 a waiver of the rule. a waiver of the rule. Turk 247 3 Petitioners . . . petitioners Turk 247 4 its purpose. A its purpose as a Turk 247 9 page 77 page 377 Turk 247 13 theyre saying were saying Turk 247 22 the GEIS a GEIS Turk 248 2 contention contention Turk 251 16 at the plain. at the plant. Rumelt 256 15 SAS SEIS Turk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of )
)
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-250-SLR
) 50-251-SLR (Turkey Point Nuclear Generating )
Units 3 & 4)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange and by electronic mail as indicated by an asterisk (*).
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop: O-16B33 Mail Stop - O-14A44 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov Anita Ghosh, Esq.
Brian Harris, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Esther R. Houseman Office of the Secretary of the Commission David E. Roth, Esq.
Mail Stop: O-16B33 Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
Washington, DC 20555-0001 Jeremy L. Wachutka, Esq.
E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov Mitzi A. Young, Esq.
Krupskaya T. Castellon, Paralegal Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel E-mail: Anita.Ghosh@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Brian.Harris@nrc.gov Washington, DC 20555-0001 Esther.Houseman@nrc.gov E. Roy Hawkens, Chairman David.Roth@nrc.gov Sue Abrue, Administrative Judge Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov Michael F. Kennedy, Administrative Judge Jeremy.Wachutka@nrc.gov Sarah B. Ladin, Law Clerk Mitzi.Young@nrc.gov Joseph D. McManus, Law Clerk Krupskaya.Castellon@nrc.gov E-mail: Roy.Hawkens@nrc.gov Sue.Abrue@nrc.gov Florida Power & Light Company Michael.Kennedy@nrc.gov 801 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Suite 220 Sarah.Ladin@nrc.gov Washington, DC 20004 Joseph.McManus@nrc.gov Steven C. Hamrick, Esq.
E-mail: steven.hamrick@fpl.com
Turkey Point, Units 3 & 4, Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251-SLR ORDER (Adopting Transcript Corrections)
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Albert Gomez*
1111 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 3566 Vista Court Washington, DC 20004 Miami, FL 33133 Paul M. Bessette, Esq. E-mail: albert@icassemblies.com Stephen J. Burdick, Esq.
Ryan K. Lighty, Esq. Monroe County, Florida Martin J. ONeill Derek Howard, Esq.
E-mail: Paul.Bessette@morganlewis.com Assistant Monroe County Attorney Stephen.Burdick@morganlewis.com 1111 12th Street, Suite 408 Ryan.Lighty@morganlewis.com Key West, FL 33040 Martin.Oneill@mrganlewis.com E-mail: howard-derek@monroecounty-fl.gov Natural Resources Defense Council 1152 15th Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20005 Geoffrey H. Fettus E-mail: gfettus@nrdc.org Southern Alliance for Clean Energy 1725 DeSales Street N,W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 Diane Curran Harmon, Curran, Spielberg, & Eisenberg, LLP E-mail: dcurran@harmoncurran.com Counsel for Miami Waterkeeper, Inc.
The Super Law Group 180 Maiden Lane, Suite 601 New York, NY 10038 Edan Rotenberg, Esq.
Email: edan@superlawgroup.com
[Original signed by Clara Sola ]
Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of December, 2018 2