ML18227B022

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reporting Unusual Event No. 251-75-1 of Revised ECCS Analysis, for Value for Peak Clad Temperature Is in Error
ML18227B022
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/07/1975
From: Schmidt A
Florida Power & Light Co
To: Rusche B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LER 1975-001-00
Download: ML18227B022 (6)


Text

NRC DISTRIBUTION FOR PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL (TEViPORARY FORM)

CONTROL NO:

FILE.

F ROM. P lorida . Power & Light Co, DATE OF DOC DATE 'R EC'D LTR TWX RPT OTHER Miami, Fla A D Schiilidt TO: ORIG CC OTHER SENTNRC PDR Mr Benard C. Rusche 1-signed SENT LOCAL PDR ~zx CLASS UNCLASS PROPINFO INPUT NO CYS REC'D DO.CKET NO:

50-251 DESCRIPTION: ENCLOSURES:

Ltr, furn-info concerning revised ECCS Anaiysis concerning Turkey Point Unit 84 unusuali event 875-1 PLANT NAME:

Turkey iPoint 8'4 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION 7-16-75 JGB BUTLER (L) SCHWENCER (L) Zl EViANN (L) REGAN (E)

'N/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies CLARK (L) STOLZ (L) DICKER (E) MA/ (L)

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies WkCopies PARR (L) VASSALLO (L) KNIGHTON (E) SPIES '/

W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copies Copies KNI EL (L) PURPLE (L) YOUNGBLOOD (E) LPM W/ Copies - W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ opies INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION TECH REVIEW DENTON LIC ASST A/T I ND ~

RC PDR SCHROEDER G R IMES R. DIGGS {L) BRAITMAN

~gC, ROOM P-506A MACCARY GAMMILL I-I. GEARIN (L) SALTZMAN

~OSSI CK/STAF F KNIGHT KASTNER E. GOULBOURNE (L) ME LTZ

~USE PAW LI CK I BALLARD P. KREUTZER (E)

~ulAMBUSSO SHAO SPANGLER J. LEE (L) PLANS

~OYD a&ELLO-( M.RU3HBROOZ{L) MCDONALD MOORE(L) HOUSTON ENVI RO S. REED(E) CHAPMAN

~VAK DEYOUNG (I ) 'ULLER SERVICE (L) DUBE (Ltr)

SKOVHOLT (L) MOSS DICKER . S. SHFPPARD (L) E. COUPE GOLI ER (L) (Ltr) IPPO LITO KNIGHTON M:SLATER (E) PE1 ERSON P. COLLINS WEDESCO YOUNGBLOOD H. SMITH (L) HARTFIELD {2)

DE ISE S.COLLINS S. TEETS (L) KLECKER R~AN'OJECT G OPR ~INAS LDR G. Wl L LIAMS (E) EISENHUT FILF. 5 REGION (2) BENAROYA DW<+ V. WILSON (L) Wl GG I N TON 8

~HAtdr'AR MIPC VOLLMER LESS vfi. (NGRAM (L) rr Irr'rtir' M. DUNCAN EXTERNAL DISTRIBUTION LOCAL PDR~ami, Pla P D R-SAN/LA/NY TIC (ABERNATHY) (1)(2)(10) NATIONALLABS 1 BROOKHAVEN NAT LAB iNSIC (BUCHANAN) 1 W. PENNINGTON, Rm I'='-201 GT 1 ASLB 1 1 G. ULRIKSON ORNL NEWMARK/8 LUME/AGBAR I AN CONSULTANTS'ewtoll Alldersoll ACRS /%IIII~/SENT

+rr i jr

lt

~ I 1I n

I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...g~gr~

P. O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FLORIDA 33101

/Itive%

FLORIDA POWER 5 LIGHT COMPANY 12 July 7, 1975 C@P Mr. Benard C. Rusche, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Rusche:

UNUSUAL EVENT NO. 251-75-1 TURKEY POINT UNXT NO. 4 REVISED ECCS ANALYSXS A. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT An audit by Westinghouse of the calculations of the ECCS analysis for the large break spectrum for Turkey Point Unit No. 4, Cycle 2 has shown that the value for peak clad temperature is in error. Using the NRC approved 10 CFR 50.46, Appendix K Westinghouse ECCS evaluation model, an analysis was submitted by Florida Power a Light Company to the Regulatory Staff on March 10, 1975, indicating a peak clad temperature of 2150' for a loss-of-coolant accident under the worst break condition when operating the plant at 2300 MWT with a peaking factor of 2.32. The correct peak clad temperature for Unit No. 4, Cycle 2, operating at 2300 MWT is 2233' which is above the 2200' limit imposed by the Final Acceptance Criteria, 10 CFR 50.46.

B. A arent Cause and Anal sis of Event In performing the analysis for Turkey Point Unit No. 4, Westinghouse used the fuel design data 'for Unit No. 3. It was determined that due to a lower fuel pellet sintering temperature limit and a higher rod internal gas pressure this fuel design data is not applicable for Cycle 2 of Unit No. 4.

A re-calculation with the correct input resulted in a net increase in peak clad temperature of approximately 83',

i. e., PCT = 2150 + 83. In order to limit this increase to

<50', which would, result in a peak clad temperature of

<2200', a reduction of approximately 2% in peak linear power would be necessary.

C. 'CORRECTXVE 'ACTXON The reported analysis is based on plant operation at 2300 MWT, while the licensed power is 2200 MWT. A corrected LOCA 740O HELPING BUILD FLORIDA

l 0 'I J

'J j I

Mr. Benard C. Rusche, Director Page Two July 7, 1975 calculation of the worst break for Unit 4, Cycle 2 operation at 2200 MWT with a peaking factor of 2.32 shows a peak clad temperature of 2158', well below the 2200 F limit. Nuclear physics calculations and in-core flux measurements indicate that the actual peaking factor will be well below 2.32 throughout Cycle 2 when operating with constant axial offset control at 2200 MWT thus providing the required safety margin.

Westinghouse is continuing their investigation and re-analysis and you will be apprised of the results.

The margin that is available when operating Turkey Point Unit.

No. 4 in accordance with present Technical Specifications, which limit the maximum power to 2200 MWT, is sufficient to assure that there are no significant hazards considerations and there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered.

Very truly yours, A. D. Schmidt, Vice President.

Power Resources PJW/cpc cc: Mr. Norman C. Moseley Jack R. Newman, Esquire

1