ML18228A481
| ML18228A481 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/04/1978 |
| From: | Robert E. Uhrig Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| Download: ML18228A481 (74) | |
Text
DISTRIBUTION &TER ISSUANCE OF PERATING LICENSE iVRC Fcf~~ 195 (2-7S)
U.S. NUCI EAA REGVI ATORVCob'ION QQC ER
- o-2s-2w/
35 NRC DISTRIBUTION FoR PART 50 DOCKET MATERIAL BLETTER
~OA IG INAI.
QCOPV QNQTOAI2EQ PCl4C I.ASSI F I E Q Mr. A Schwencer FROM:
FPL Miami, FL 33101 PROP INPUT FORM GATE OF OOCUMENT 04 04 OATE AECEIVFQ 04/06/78 NUMBEA OF COPIES RECEIVEQ sr@>eG OESCRIPTION ENCI.OSU RE
Response
to NRC ltr dtd 03/16/78 ~ ~ ~
Furnishing addi info re the FPL system distrubance which occurred on May 16~
1977 '
~
w/ a'tt o ~ ~
1p 1/4li PLANT NAME. TURKEY POINT UNITS 3 & 4 ST LUCIE UNIT 1 jcm 04/08/78 Z~~ g~pRO MOIi 4'5 Q Q.lad &5 SAFETY BRANCH CHIEF:
7 FOR ACTION/INFORMATION LL OrffE,e. SSQCil/
-wCL
~
EGI'NTERNAL 0
Rl BUTION C
I NC 0'C SIC CRS 1
CYS SENT CATE EXTERNAL OISTRIBUTION CONTROL NUMBER 780970001
7 4
k
'II 0 F
1 pl
.O. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 MIUIliidi; FLORIDAPOWER 8( LIGHT COMPANY April 4, 1978 L-78-118 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Mr. A. Schwencer, Chief Operating Reactors Branch Nl Division of Operating Reactors U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.
C.
20555
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
Re:
Florida Power I('ight Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Information C9 C/ ~
~, 1 CXI PcD
>>4 g) g CPM rcl(
CA Your letter of March 16, 1978 requested additional infor-mation regarding the FPL system distrubance which occurred on May 16, 1977-Our responses to your additional questions are attached.
Very ly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President REU/MAS/mb Attachment cc:
Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
ATTACHMENT Re:.
Florida Power
& Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.,50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Information QUESTION 1 The response to request 1.3 gives limitations on the line based on long-term operation.
Please provide any opera-tional guidance that may exist'uch as "The line may be operated at above x amperes but not. exceeding y amperes for a time not to exceed z minutes,"
where z is a number small enough to provide operational guidance.
Line sag is computed for two different temperatures, but no indication is given as to what the temperature of the line was when't relayed open.
Please provide any recorded data on the line current over this 16-minute period (10:08-10:24) from which a temperature profile could be deter-mined.
RESPONSE
1 There is no guide for overloading conductors in the form of X < Y for 2 minutes.
There is no recording of the load on the Fort Myers-Ranch lines.
The loading was computed from other charts.
The sag figures were included to show that even under extreme conditions of ambient temperature and light wind that, it is highly improbable that the conductor would have sagged enough to contact some object to cause the phase to ground fault.
,I
Page 2
Re:
Florida Power 6 Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Information QUESTION 2
The power estimates given in response to request 1.6 are not supported by the'ata on which they were based.
Please provide the 16-minute (10:08-10:24) record of each variable that was used in making this power calculation and a sample of how the calculation was made.
A reference is made in this response to past histroy of division of the load (between the two Ft. Myers-Ranch lines).
Please provide any records of such a division of transmis-sion on these lines at approximately 500-600 MW total power.
In a dynamic situation such as the system was then exper-iencing would the relative loading of the two li'nes be expected to oscillate so that an average relative loading would not reflect peak conditions on one? If so please discuss the details.
In the response to 1.6, oscillogram records from Ringling are included; oscillogram records from Broward and Midway are cited but not included.
- Please, furnish copies of the Broward and Midway oscillogram reco'rds.
Since oscillogram records at locations remote from'a fault cannot be interpreted without some knowledge of the inter-vening circuitry, particularly transformer coupling, please furnish the indicated intervening circuitry description for Ringling, Broward, and Midway.
RESPONSE
2
'The line flows from Fort Myers to Ranch were computed
'as follows:
a)
Power available to the Western Division is the sum of the output of the plants in the Western Division minus the tie flows to Tampa Electric Company (flows into Florida Power Light are negative numbers).
These values are obtained from the various strip charts for the time period under consideration.
(Charts were previously transmitted.)
An additional chart "Area Loads" is attached to verify the
'before'oad.
(Appendix C) b)
Load in. the Western Division:
Load prior to the disturbance is obtained from the strip chart showing the area loads.
.'fter the initial disturbance, the area load chart, showed
C>
0 Page Re:
Florida Power
& -Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Information a load in the Western Division which, if true, would have indicated a reduction in line flows from Ft, Myers to Ranch.
The known deficit of generation in the south, the observation by plant personnel at Fort Myers and the alarm signal from the West Palm computer, all indicate'that the power flows from Fort Myers to Ranch did indeed increase.
There was no interruption of feeders in the Western Division but during this period the area substation load would increase; any other change in area load is due to.a change in the trans-mission line losses in the Western Division.
An estimate of'he total load in the Western Division was made.
c)
The total power flow from Fort Myers to Ranch is the power available to the Western Division
( a) above) minus the load in the Western Division
( b) above).
d)
'The division of power flow on the Fort Myers-Ranch 240kV line and on the Fort Myers-Ranch 138kV line, for analysis
- purposes, may be treated in two steps-..
(1)
The division of power flow to satisfy the load requirement of the sub-,
stations served between Fort Myers and Ranch (all such substations are connected to the 138kV line).
This total power flow equals the sum of the load at the served sub-,
stations.
(2)
The division of all other power flow in excess of (1).
, Both of these divisions must obey Kirchhoff's laws and can be combined using the superposition theorem to
, give an estimate of the individual line flows.
As the total flow from-Fort Myers to Ranch increases, the division will more nearly be that, of (2).
Using a D.
C. analog calculating board set up to represent the reactances of the transmission lines and transformers, the (2) division was determined to be 75% on the Fort Myers-Ranch 240kV line and 25% on the Fort, Myers-Ranch 138kV line.
The attached-table (Appendix C) shows the values of the Fort Myers-Ranch 240kV line flows for significant times during the disturbance on Florida Power 6 Light Company's system of May 16, 1977.
There are no records showing the division of load on these two lines at approximately 500 600 MW total power.
In a dynamic situation, the relative loading of the two Fort Myers-Ranch lines would be expected to vary together according to Kirch-hoff's laws with no oscillation between the two circuits.
Page 4
~
, Re:
Florida Power 6 Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos. 50-250,.50-251, and 50-335
. Re uest for Additional Information The,oscillograms for Broward and Midway are attached (Appendix C).
Please note that all traces on the Broward oscillogram are from the 138kV side of the station.
The 138kV and 240 kV sections are connected through Wye connected autotransformers, solidly grounded.
A diagram-of the transmission system is attached (Appendix C).
Generator transformers have been omitted to reduce clutter.
All generators are connected to the system through delta wye trans-formers.
The high side is wye, solidly grounded.
A schematic drawing is also included.
Page 5
Re:
Florida Power 6 Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Information QUESTION 3
The response to request 2
"We have concluded that, the Turkey Point trip could not by itself, have caused the line to relay" is not supported.
Please furnish any supporting analyses with a full description.
RESPONSE
3 The conclusion that the system was stable at 10:24 a.m.,
May 16,
- 1977, was based on the following:
1)
The system continued to operate for 16 minutes follow-ing the loss of Turkey Point No. 3.
2)
Oscillograms from Ringling show no sign of instability before loss of Fort Myers-Ranch circuit.
3)
Oscillograms from Midway show no sign of instability before the loss. of Fort Myers-Ranch circuit.
4)
Oscillograms from Broward show no sign of instability before the loss of the Fort Myers-Ranch circuit.
5)
Total generation was increasing.
Copy of total genera-tion chart attached (Appendix D).
6)
There were no reports from operators that voltage, watts or vars were oscillating.
7)
The Fort Myers-Ringling 240kV circuit tripped at both ends.
Since the relays are directional, only one end would trip for an overload condition.
Only an internal fault could cause 'infeed from both ends.
There were=
ground targets at Ranch and at Fort Myers.
Circuits tripping from an unstable condition will trip with phase targets.
Since all three phases must swing together, the swing is balanced and therefore there is no ground current to operate ground relays.
8)
From ratings furnished by conductor manufacturers, we have obtained conductor temperatures for various con-ditions of loading and ambient temperature.
From the
Page 6
Re:
Florida Power a Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Xnformation SCADA alarm 'log from Nest Palm Beach, we can determine that the watt loading was near or slightly above the alarm'setpoint of 418MW, and that the VAR loading was
- below the setpoint of 147MVAR.
This loading is such that it is highly unlikely that the conductor would sag enough to contact some object and cause a phase-to-ground fault.
The loadings are reasonably confirmed by taking the change in ties, change in-generation, and change in'west coast load to determine the total power flow at the time of loss.
9)
The line loading of the Fort Myers-Ranch line was well under the tripping value.
Setting sheets are attached (Appendix D) with a plot of the. relay characteristic in terms of R
& X and a plot in terms, of watts and vars.'
Page 7
Re:
Florida Power 6 Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Information QUESTION 4
The response to request 3 appears to suggest that the cal-culation involving the loss of Turkey Point 4 in the FCG study is to be considered to bound the events which occurred around 10:08 on 5/16/77.
If this suggestion is intended, please furnish a detailed description of this calculation showing relevant detail which causes it to be regarded as bounding.
RESPONSE
4 The Stone
& Webster report to the Public Service Commission dated May 10,
- 1973, recommended system studies relating to items such as load shedding and line relaying.
Stone Webster was retained to perform such studies and prepare recommendations.
From these, modifications in operating and design practices have been implemented.
An additional stability study, performed by an FCG task force, involved an off-peak load level case study of the loss of one Turkey Point unit with the cross-state 500 kV line out of service.
In response to your request for a detailed description of this "calculation", those por-tions of the FCG study that relate to this specific case are attached as Appendix A.
The computer program used is the PECO stability program which was run on the Florida Power Corporation IBM 370/168 system at St. Petersburg, Florida.
The study is considered reasonable as a bounding case for the first event of May 16, 1977.
The study case assumes the 500 kV cross-state line out for maintenance, assumes an FPL load level of 4634 MW, and assumes the loss of a large unit at Turkey Point (700 MW).
On May 16, the 500 kV line was out, the FPL load at 10:07 a.m.
was 4710 MW (net),
and the unit dropped at Turkey Point was carrying 684 MW (net).
The study case indicated that such a syst: em was stable.
In fact, on May 16, the system remained stable (e.g.,
no cascading load loss, no line relay action, frequency decay arrested and returned to normal) following the disturbance at 10:08 a.m. involving the trip of the Turkey Point unit.
You may also wish to refer to the Federal Power Commission report for the first quarter of 1977 (partial copy attached as Appendix B)-
Page 8
Re:
Florida Power
& Light Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest-for Additional Information QUESTION 5
The response to request 6 is not clear in some respects.-
Is our understanding that Southern Co.
and Florida Power and Light Company have not yet entered an agreement for.a
,500 kV Georgia-Florida tie correct?
Is our understanding that 800 MN interchange capability from Georgia to Florida (which was, according to referenced FPGL reports, to be ready in 1976) is not yet available correct?
RESPONSE
5 The load growth and the generation/transmission expansion plans of both Florida and Georgia were revised to reflect the slower economic growth of the nation.
The need for additional transmission tie 1ines between Florida and Georgia was altered accordingly.
Thus, the in-service date for the 500 kV tie is now conceived by both Florida and Georgia to fall into the late 1980's (possibly as late as 1990).
Therefore, no agreement with Georgia has been reached.
This will be monitored closely by the Federal Energy Re-gulatory Commission,
- SERC, FCG, Florida Public Service Commission, Georgia Power Company, and Flo'rida Power 6 Light Company.
A January 1980 in-service date for a 240 kV line from Yulee (Florida) to Kingsland (Georgia) has been agreed to by Georgia Power Company and Florida Power 6 Light Company with additional supportive facilities to establish a transmission interconnection.
Page 9
Re:
Florida Power S'ight Company (FPL)
Docket Nos.
50-250, 50-251, and 50-335 Re uest for Additional Information QUESTION 6
The reply to request 7.3 is not fully responsive.
Please provide the discussion requested.
RESPONSE
6 Turkey Point, Unit 4 was removed from service to perform scheduled refueling, maintenance, and inspections of nuclear and non-nuclear systems on May 9, 1977.
Maintenance and refueling are occurrences which are normal and anticipated.
Generating capacity available was sufficient to meet anticipa-ted loads with adequate reserve margins.
Because periodic maintenance of generating facilities is a routine procedure, and had begun seven days prior to the disturbance on May 16, there was no need for a specific discussion of this event within the referenced report.
A status of all installed capacity at 10:08 a.m.,
May 16,
- 1977, was included in the report as Figure 5.
The Andytown-Orange River 500 kV line had been operating at 230 kV since 1974.
Conversion to 500 kV was scheduled for 1977 and construction had begun in 1976 to accomplish this.
On May 9, 1977, the line was removed from service on a continuous clearance for final line work.
The line was temporarily energized at 500 kV on May 14.
On Sunday night, May 15, the line was removed from service in accordance with a clearance scheduled on May 16; to permit final calibration of protective systems.
Removal of transmission facilities from service from time to time to facilitate construction or maintenance is a normal practice.
For these reasons it was not necessary to discuss this within the referenced report.
The status of the Andytown-Orange River 500 kV line on May 16, 1977, is clearly indicated on 'Figures 2 and 4.
The "Report on System Disturbance, May 16, 1977" was prepared to address the disturbance and provide an analysis of those events directly related to it.
The Report and Exhibits taken as a whole, clearly establish the initial condition of:the system on May 17, 1977.
A discussion of events, prior to that time, was not intended since the system was operating within limits on the morning of May 16.
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX A FLORIDA ELECTRIC POWER COORDI~ING GROUP (FCG) 402 REO NCREET, SUITE 214
~ TAMPA, FLORI~33609
~ (813) 877.5301 July 27, 1977 SYSTEM PLANNING COMMITTEE:
Mr. J.
S. Bell, Florida Power 6 Light Company Mr. R. T. Bowles, Florida Power Corporation Mr. Larry Gawlik,,Gainesville/Alachua County Regional Utilities Board Mr. M.
W. Howell, Gulf'ower Company Mr. R. T. Dyer, Jacksonville Electric Authority Mr. R. E. Arnold, Lake North Utilities Authority Mr. R.
W. Cochran, Lakeland Department of Electric Water Utilities Mr. D. E. Moore, Orlando Utilities Commission Mr. R.
W. Claussen, Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Nr.
G. T.'Lawrence, City of Tallahassee Electric Department Mr. R. E. Proctor, Tampa Electric Company
SUBJECT:
OFF-PEAK TRANSIENT STABILITY STUDY FOR 1977 The 1977 Transient Stability Task Force was assigned to investigate the transient response of the State Bulk Power System for various contingencies which may occur during off-peak operating conditions.
These contingencies are set forth in SERC Guidelines, Number 3, "Criteria for Reliability in System Planning."
The recommendations of this study will assure that cascading outages will not result from any foreseeable contingencies.
This study was the combined effort of individuals in every member company of the System Planning Committee.
During the months of January and February, the Task Force spent two weeks in St. Petersburg, Florida, in order to expedite this study.
Respectfully submitted, GLH/ds 1977 Transient Stability Task Force:
G. L. Hofacker, Chairman (FPL)
A. N. Darlington (TEC)
G. F. Erickson (OUC)
C.
N. Hansen,(FPC)
H.
D. Powell (JEA)
INTRODUCTION The System Planning Committee commissioned the 1977 Off Peak Transient Stab@la,ty Task Force to analyze certain transient stability phenomena of the Interconnected Generation/
Transmission System proposed to be in service during l977.
System planning person'nel from the following utilities either worked on the Task Force or provided data to produce the results stated in this report:
Florida Power Corporation Florida Power 6 Light Company Gainesville-Alachua County Regional Utilities Board Jacksonville Electric Authority.
h Lakeland Department of Electric
& Water Utiliities Orlando Utilities Commission City of Tallahassee Tampa Electric Company The general study categories are listed below:
l.
Generation Losses
, A three-part analysis associated with:
- a. 'he transient effects associated with single nuclear generator contingency outages.
b.
The transient effects associated with multiple c
~
generator contingency outages.
The transient effects associated with single nuclear generator contingency outages on a fragmented transmission system.
, A-2
2.
Transmission Losses An analysis of the transient effects on the, system resulting from a three-phase, delayed-clearing fault.
These studies were run on Florida Power Corporation's IBM System 370 Computer, utilizing the Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO)
Load Flow and Transient Stability programs--
the latter modified by Florida Power Corporation.
The Task Force met during the last week of January 1977 and, the last two days of February 1977 in St. Petersburg,
,Florida, to run and analyze cases.
All case studies were completed on the computer by the end of April 1977.
The features incorporated in the modified version of the Transient Stability program include:
1.
Provision to model underfrequency relays allowing three independent set points and intentional relay time delay settings at each bus with separate and independent breaker time.
2.
Provision to model most transmission line relays which may operate due to positive sequence transients.
3-Relay representations included the following types:
a.
Impedance b.
Reactance c.
Underfrequency d.
Directional Comparison Carrier Blocking
'Each distance relay could be modeled with three separate distance and time settings and independent breaker trip and reclose time specification.
A-3
4.
.Summary Reports for:
a.
Load damping for selected areas.
b." Turbine response for selected areas.
c.. Line flow change for selected lines.
d.
Line flow for selected lines.
e.
Machine frequency and angle for all units.
A-4
PURPOSE The purpose of these studies was to analyze the 1977 State system to provide an understanding of the transient response during off-peak conditions.
The primary interests were to:
Simulate selected single unit generation outages under two circumstances; with complete trans-mission system and fragmented transmission system.
2.
Determine if emergency reactor coolant pump operation would be initiated on nuclear generating units.
3-Determine the underfreguency relay response in the State for the 1977 time period such that no
~ firm load would be shed for the loss of the largest unit.
4 ~
Determine if the response of the Florida bulk power system to the'contingencies studied would result in any cascading from the Peninsular Florida Subregion into the Southern Company Subregion.
Provide a,report to be used as a guide for future
'I studies on the subject.
, A-5
PERIOD OF STUDY This study was done considering certain significant generation and transmission facilities to be in service.
These facilities were (1) the Andytown Orange River 500 kV line, and (2) Crystal River Unit 3, St. Lucie Unit 1, and Port Manatee Unit l.
The task force used the published Florida Load Duration Curves for 1974 to determine the value for the off-peak load level.
The load value was plotted as a function of the duration of that particular load level during the year 1974.
The peak of this curve was selected as a starting point and the duration of each load point above and below the center point was summed to determine the percent load range that represented 50 percent of the time.
The recommended load level is that load level which falls mid-way in this range.
This value compares very closely with the composite load duration curves published in the subject report.
The load vel chosen was 5
ercent of the 1977 estimate of summer o d of eac utilit.
Adjustments to this figure were made by Florida Power Corporation and Tampa Electric Company, reflecting industrial load. It was assumed that. a high power factor would be in effect at this load level; hence, no transmission compensation was required.
A-6
The load. level and spinning reserve used in the Base Case Load Flow is tabulated below:
Utilit Florida Power Corporation Florida Power
& Light Company Gainesville-Alachua County RUB Jacksonville Electric Authority City of Lakeland Orlando Utilities Commission City of Tallahassee, Tampa Electric Company (FPC)
(FPL)
(GVL)
(JEA)
(LAK)
(OUC)
(TAL)
(TEC)
Load and Losses (MN) 2,417 4,634 101 709 131 259 139 1,125 Spinning Reserve (m) 340 486 21 181 37 101
. 68 207 State of Florida Total Southern Company Equivalent 9,515 11,414 1,441 0
TOTAL 20,929 1,441 A-7
CASE TSS-77-4A2 LOSS OF TURKEY POINT UNIT 4 (700 MW)
WITH FRAGMENTED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM This case simulation was chosen in order to observe the transient response of the system for the loss of a large generating unit in extreme southern Florida during a time period when certain transmission circuits considered vital to maintain system integrity have been removed.
This condition is analogous'to having these circuits removed for maintenance.
The transmission lines selected for removal were the Andytown Orange River 500 kV circuit, the Midway Indiantown 230 kV circuit; and the Central Florida Clermont East 230 kV circuit.
Specific items of interest are:
1)
The transient response of the state for the loss of a significant percentage of dispatched system generation during off-peak conditions.
2)
The resulting frequency and voltage response which may cause the operation of emergency reactor coolant pumps.
'I 3)
To determine if underfrequency load shedding
,will occur.
4)
To observe any tendency toward cascading.
A-8
RESULTS AND OBSERVATIONS The loss of this unit resulted in the frequency'decline of the other units in the state.
Turkey Point Unit 3 reached a minimum frequency of 59.58 Hz at approximately T = 0.35 second.
This frequency represented the lowest that occurred on any State of Florida generating unit.
Frequency deviations from 60.00 Hz on those units'progressively removed from Turkey Point were smaller and occurred later in simulation time (see Figure 4A2-2).
System response recovered the 700 MW loss by T = 0.7 second.
The largest initial -contribution was from load damping, followed respectively by tie line flows and turbine response (see Figure 4A2-1).
The load damping peak was 697 MW at T = 1.7 seconds; turbine response peaked 0.1 second later at 243 MW.
Tie lines were exporting approximately 3
MW of power when the unit outage occurred (see Figure 4A2-3).
These tie lines were composed of the following circuits:
1)
Suwannee-Archer 230 kV 2)
Ft. White-Xnglis 115 kV 3)
Ft. White-Newberry 115 kV
- 4),Ft. White-High Springs 69 kV Net power flow over these tie lines reversed at T = 0.2
- second, increasing to a peak of 515 MW at. T = 2.4 seconds to the south.
No transmission line relays operated dur'ing the course of the study.
A-9
A voltage profile for selected buses throughout the state reveals the following excursions from initial conditions:
TABLE I:
VOLTAGE PROFILE (PERCENT)
Bus Initial Vo~tacae Minimum Voltage Difference Voltage 8 T=4.0 Turkey Point Andytown Ft. Myers Midway Volusia 230 kv 230 kv 230 kv 230'v 230 kv (FPL)
(FPL)
(FPL)
(FPL)
(FPL) 105. 7 105.1 104.9 105.6 104.4
- 96. 5
- 92. 2
- 92. 2
- 94. 6 100. 6
-9.2
-12.9
-12.7
-11.0
-3.8 104. 9 102. 6 101.7 101. 8 103. 7 Suwannee Crystal River Gannon Pebbledale 230 kv 230 kv 230 kV 230 kv (FPC)
.'02. 3 (FPC) 105. 7 (TEC),
104. 7 (TEC) 101.8
- 94. 6 101. 3 101. 7
- 97. 9 7 e 7
-4 4
-3. 0
-3. 9 103. 5 106.1 103. 8 100.4 Northside Indian River Larsen Hopkins Parker Road 230 kv 230 kv 69 kv 230 kv 230 kv
/
(JEA)
(OUC)
(LAK)
(TAL)
(GVL) 101. 7 105.7 102.7 100.7 103.7 100. 3 101. 1
- 98. 2
- 98. 3 94.7
-l. 4
-4. 6
-4.5
-2. 4
-9. 0 101.3 105.0 100.2 101.7 103.1 t
The, lowest free(uency and terminal voltage occurring on the three remaining nuclear generating units are tabulated below:
TABLE II:
NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT DATA Unit Turkey Point 3
St.'Lucie 1
Crystal River 3
Lowest Frequency (Hz)
- 59. 58 59.77'9.80 Lowest Terminal Voltage (Percent) 92.4 89.8 100.1 A-10
CONCLUSIONS Based on the assumptions included in this study, the following conclusions can be stated:
- 1) There will be no separation of Peninsular Florida from the north for the loss of this unit.
2)
The resulting frequency and voltage response of the three nuclear units connected to the system is such that emergency reactor coolant pump operation will not be initiated.
3)
No load shedding will occur.
4)
No transmission line relay operations will occur from the loss of this unit.
5)
No tendency toward cascading was observed.
1400 1200 1000 SYSTEM RESPONSE LOSS OF TURKEY POINT 4
{700MN)
FRAGMENTED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TSS-77-4A2 Total Response Gross Load Damping-
~
~
~ -..
Line Flow Change-Turbine Response 8
800 X
I m
600 C
R 400
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
200
~
~
pC
+os g M ggi 00.0 0.5 1.0
. 1.5
'2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 TIME SECONDS
0
60.20 60.10 60.00
- 59. 90 I
59.80
- X
~.
we
~
~ ~
/
/
~
0
~wtr
<<0 ~
~ J
<<N~o ~
- 59. 70 59.60 59.500.0 0.5 l.0 l.5 2.0 TIME SECONDS FREQUENC'2 DEPARTURE LOSS OF "URKE'l POINT 4-:,i0()HN)
FRAGiME¹'ZD "HANSYi SSION SYSTEM rSS-.7-4A2 Turkey Poinr 3
Crystal R ver 3
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Big Bend 2
Ina'an R='ze Northside 3
600 500 400 30 Z
I g
20 0
4
/////
r
//
4/
LINE FLON SOUTH LOSS OF TURKEY POINT 4
(700MW)
FRAGMENTED TRANSMISSION SYSTEM TSS-77-4A2 Total
-10 Suwannee-Archer 230kV-0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 TIME SECONDS 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
APPENDIX 8
APPENDIX B FPC REPORTS ON ELECTRIC POWER DISTURBANCES DURING: THE SECOND QUARTER OF 1977 APRXL 1 JUNE 30, 1977 The Federal Power Commissi:on (FPC) requires all electric
-utilities to report electric power disturbances under Order 331-1.
The reports 'are classified into three categories; bulk power supply interruptions which, result in loss of ultimate customer load, load reduction measures which do not necessarily result in disconnection of customer load, and events which constitute an unusual hazard to bulk electric power supply=
The second quarter of 1977 reported disturbances are briefly summarized for each classification in attached Tables I, XX, and XXX.
The major disturbances are described in greater detail below:
I
- Bulk Power Su 1
Xnterru tions r
During the second quarter of 1977, the nation's electric utility systems reported eight bulk power supply interruptions to, FPC.
P FPC Order No, 331-1 requires electric systems to report all interruptions of bulk power supply caused by'he outage of any generating unit or electric facility operating at a nominal
. voltage of 69.kilov'olts or higher and resulting in a load loss for 15 minutes or longer. of at least 100 megawatts.'
Smaller
'ystems must report i 5 one-half or more of the annual system peak load is involved.
The major interruptions are described below.
Florida Power and Light Co.
Nay 16, 1977 Tne largest bulk electric power interruption in terms of customers and load occurred on Hay 16,
- 1977, when 1,300,000 customers, representing 3,227 megawatts of load, were deprived of service for periods up to four hours and 36 minutes during an outage on Florida Power a Light Company's (FP&L) system During this period, three, separate incidents of system dis-turbance occurred, which are categorized as:
l." Forced outage of Turkey PoinC Unit No. 3,
-"a 666-megawatt nuclear unit.
2.
Loss of the FC. Myers-Ranch 240-kilovolt transmission line;" and
- 3.
Loss of the Andytown-Orange River 500-kilovolt line.
r At 10:08 a.m.'. Turkey Point Unit No.
3 experienced a
reactor and turbine trip as the result of a false relay signal
.which caused the loss of 684 megawatts in generation.
The north-south lines in the State of Florida relayed, isolating the Peninsula from the north.
The combined spinning reserves of the Florida system were sufficient to cover the loss and arrest the frequency decline-at 59 59 hertz,.and no customer service was affected
. At 10:14 a.m.
the interconnection to
.the north was re-established and the frequency returned to 60 hertz.
However, with the loss of Turkey Point: No. 3,'he system transmission line loadings were such that the Ft.
Nyers-Ranch'40-kilovolt line was loaded to its maximum thermal-rating Ten minutes later, a second
- outage, which extended from Fort Pierce southward alon'g the East Coast to the Florida Keys',
was triggered when the heavily loaded (west to east flow) Ft.
Myers-Ranch 240-kilovolt line tripped because of a phase-to-ground fault.
This caused heavy north to south flows tripping
. other key transmission lines.
This division of the transmission system resulted in the St. Lucie Plant of the eastern area being tied only to the northern system area, tne Riviera Plant being islanded with part of the eastern system area load, and creation of an isolaCed southern area.
In the southern area, Port Everglades Units 1 and 3 and Turkey Point Units 1 and 2 were generating a total of 1,003 megawatts to supply approximately 2,950 megawatts of load.
~
This load-generation imbalance caused a rapid decrease in frequency to below 56 hertz.
Underfrequency relays operated
'to shed approximately '1,544 megawatCs of load.
The four units operating at Port Everglades and Turkey Point Plants became overloaded and tripped out due to underspeed protection.,
Tne isolaCed eastern area's Riviera Plant was shut down because of excess generation and subsequent operaCional problems following rapid unloading.
B-2
The other FP&L system, islands, (north and west) went into
- overfrequency from excess generation causing tne St., Lucie Unit 1 operator to manually trip the nuclear unit due to rapid unloading to an unsatisfactory level.
Shortly the frequency in the north and west recovered to normal, which permitted re-establishment of the north-south PP&L system ties and reconnec-tion to other Florida systems The total number of customers affected by this series of events was 1,300,000, representing 3,227 megawatts of load.
Restoration of the south and eastern areas began and most of the load was re-es'tablished by 12:03 p.m.,'fter one hour and 39 minutes.
During ~his initial restoration at, 12:03 p.m. the third incident occurred when the Andytown-Orange 500-kilovolt line tripped because of the misoperation of a fault pressure relay on the "A" phase of the 240/500-kilovolt autotransformer at Andytown.
This initiated a power swing which resulted in the separation of the entire eastern and southern areas at Nalabar.
Generation in the affected area was again separated by under-frequency generator protection and overcurrent relay operation.
The total amount of load lost was 2,025 megawatts.
Service restoration again proceeded immediately.
Gas turbines quickly picked up load in the isolated areas and were synchronized with the northern system.
Service was restored to all but a few small isolated areas by 3:00 p.m. the same. day;
'Ii Tennessee Valley Authority tlay 2," 1977 Zn terms of load, the second largest bulk electric power interruption occurred on Nay 2, 1977, on the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) system when the loss of two Electric Energy Tnc. 161-kilovolt transmission lines supplying load to the Energy Research-and Development Administration (ERDA) in Paducah,
circuit to the ERDA load center Following loss of the TVA circuit from its Shawnee plant, three of the plant's units tripped, resulting'n a power interruption which lasted for
.five hours and 29 minutes and a load loss totaling 1,0S4 mega-watts.
Only one industrial customer, ERDA, was affected by the outage.
h B-3
APPENDIX C Sample Calculation Area Load Chart Transmission System Breaker Diagram 4/1/77 (8 sheets)
Transmission System Schematic Diagram Oscillograms Broward (1 roll)
Oscillograms Midway (1 roll)
CNW:sh 3/30/78 SAMPLE OF CALCULATION OF FT.
MYERS-RANCH 240l<V LINE LOADING APPROX I MATE Tl 10:07 10:08-10:23 10:24 TAMPA Tl ES 82 MANATEE m
-70 105 585
-180 20 638
-180 20 677 70 '50 570 FT.
MYERS
$31 P2 GT
. 108 337 0
- 128, 346 0
128 365 5
107 310 5
POWER AVAILA8LE 995 1272.
1335 672 AREA LOAD 705 710 740-672 290 562 595 0
191 395 420 0
FORT MYERS " RANCH FLOWS 240kV LINE TOTAL
h 3'"
t
< ~
~
~
~ ~
}
(~
L J
I";
I
~ it t.-}
.q..r:.I
)';I Ja p I
}IIll Q ECS A'<VA~
- IIpQ, 1 ~
I
~
~
I l
C,
LAUDERDALE RAI WAY TO LIIAMIBEACH SEE SHEET-2 88$A(212) t
~ttc
~!8 LGLAM Os
~:O tc 4!
O
~c Cct cc Qs TAMIAMI 1060ANCO
$60MVA 20511 300 A (34) 945A (113) 224 LIVA QS 10$0A (44 I)
$60 KVA N
dtk ST.
~t 560 MVA
~ GRAPELAND B)5IO 20529 20535 2056 t0$9$
322 36d 3ds t05SI toSI5 205IC 20598 20585 20586 20543 224 MVA MIAMI PLANT QS 351 20544 E
KEY BISCAYNE Qs 28565 28545 tksls 28566 28586 28$ie tesso 2dsk5 2d58$
S seo uve FLAGAMI 0
I494$
149 IS I~ 946 14942 H995 14949 14185 1010 A (241)
W946 I
H9SS 14924 llstl 1412$
23 'kV S
1290 A (ssd)
N CI8
~ DOUGLAS Qs 1015A(241)
NATOMA 0
OI YMPIAHEIGHTS 950 A (222)
Q MILLER tc tc 8
TROPICAL Qs ISKV 4KV E
$446 W
5615 50 MVA 5 CI4 COCONUT GROVE SC65 Qs VILLAGE GREEN UNIVERSITY Qs 1010 A (SIU I 1010 A (240 SOUTH MIAMIQs 1012$
ION0 10120 IORO LINDG 8
~l 1010 A (241) 82nd AVE QS
,I 1010 A (241)
'14$ A (11 8) 1010 A (241)
BIDQs I
1010A (24 1)
(241), 0 DADELAND 1010 (241) 0 3
GALLOWAY~
IORS 1010 A (2ll)
Qt 1010 A tt 4!
ct MARION QS KROME 960A~
(115) 1010 A (241) 8 IS 245 A (128) cc Qs KENDALL~
O tcct SNAPPER CREEK 261 T1 26381 26314 26384 2CITT 24188 2654 I 24$ cs 26212 seoMva 112 MVA
~tet IS
~tetce 26216 2624$
tetse tetsel
~tetee tetsc tetss I 26235 tetes ct ct O
O MITCH LL~
~ QS Iccct cc Qs S
560 IIVA S
DAVIS 05 t\\
ct tc cc O
tc O
CORAL REEF Qs 900A (241)
SVNILAND~
Qs tt CI tc O
SI 1320 A (sls) 0 129O A (Slel IS20 A (549) 0 WHISPERING PINES Q
PERRINE Qs 540 A (129) 9211 lskv Slo A (129) 13kv 112 MVA 9243 L 9230 9398 9320 9382 lskV CUTLER PLANT N
921$ I 9365I 9366 s285 9395 9354 9392 9359 93do 93$ 1 OS oS LEGS IITI 1320 A (54'1) 0 1290 A 5$
6'.W.
26516 26565 26545 26$lo 26452 265'T$
26$39 26451 26566 24534 26522 START UP S. E.
START UP 4
'26559
~ COLO ION STRUCTURES H.V. REACTOR
~
StATION BVS
~,
H.V.
C. B, EI I V.
C.B.
ALTERNATEFEED
~
sookV UNE 240 tV UNE 128 tV UNE III 69kV UNE AUTO TRANSIORMER U.G. CABLE 0
3 CIRCUIT NUMBER GENERATOR NUMBER 0
SUPERVI5ORY CONTROLLED STATION 0
AT AUTOMATICTRANSFER 0
hs AUTOMATICSECIIONALIZDIG VACUUM BREAKER H. V. CAPACITOR BANKS DIAGRAM HAINLIN PMNCETON Qs Ps N.W.,
26555 265IC ck 26533 teste 2di42 2 6515 tC527 o6 26 ~ 4I N.E.
IIOMESTEAD Qs START UP IO2 TURKEY POINT LUCY 0$
eddie 48819 IM22 PLANT TO MCLIUINSVB, (CITYOP HOMESTEAD)
CONOUCIOR IOENIITICL'IION COOE FOR VULIIPLE CIRCUIT STRUCTURES S
8
~ SLUE 0
~
ORLNCE R
~
REO T
~
TELLOS Mrv
$40AG29)
TRANS MISS BREAKER 8 4MVA M322 MMe L Msds Mslo W
)4545 2$MVA 1020A (244)
FLORIDA CITY Qs tsrv SHEET I)IO I MIAMI DIVISION TAVEIUIIER FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY 365A (KEYS CO OP)
SHEET I
OF JEWFISH CREEK 3ANVARYI, 19TS 0
E"40698 KPVS CO OP TBM
lk
4 LAUDERDALE PORT EVERGLADES 44 C4 72 TO LAUDERDALE SNAKE CREEK Qs tt COUNTY LINB Qs 1 A241 W
~4
~:g (7
~4 TO HIGHLANDS Ct Qs
=-
IVES TOLAU ERDALE
$ff $HffT QS GJUs Qs N5 A ON) 1010 A (241) 745 A (178)
DUMFOUNDIJNG, TO LAUDANIA rocoA (Ml)
AVENTURA 2(
og COUNTRY CLUB Qs Qs
~4 4
Cl Clo o
GARDEN Qs GOLDEN GLADES Qs OPA LOCKA Qs RED ROAD
~ DBANDONQS ar 1$
C R
I FULFORD Q
Q s
WESTON VILLAGE 4;( g cl 44 1010 Sr A (241) o ULETA Qs oC ARCH CREEK Qs E
$ 2995
$2965 S2945
$ 2955 10 10A (24 1) 97 m
540 hlVA
$021$
$0265
$ 0245
$0246
$0216
$ 0285 S
GREYNOLD Qs g
II sUNNY rsLES Qs 44 R
~!o R
t4 Clo Qs
~ BISCAYNE Qs 1290 A ($04)
BOULEVARD Qs AULOVER ISSLS IlkV lskV 1095(262)
~4 18128 18216 18215 18$ (4 f
18$ es GRATIGNY Qs SEABOARD Qs 900 A (215)
MIAMIsHGBEs Qs Ir 1$ kv CO46 S
J 6052 -L eosr L 6088 j 6080 6072 6082 core f eoee f eoes 1290 A ($08)
LEMON CITY Qs Ct C4 NORMANDY BEACH QS K
1$ kv
$ 0515
$0585
$054$
$0542
$ 0MS 1$ KV H2 MVA ctt4
~4 900 A (215)
SEMBIOLAQs 4\\
Fc t!
R W
CC 224 MVA 609$
604$
C096 1$kv 1$kv LITTLE RIVER Qs
$2051
$2020 ISSV INDIAN CREEK
$1010 LCO 100 VA MVA
$2054
$2080 o
Ct ROSEI AWN~
Qs 9$0 A (222) 685A(212)
$00 A ($ 6)
Qs
$2057 955A (114) 9 ~ re 9415 1210 A (Me)
~4tl t4 t!
lt 574
~4
~4
~4o 444444 Al Q
4 490 A IT) 900 A (215)
GLADEVIEW~
Qs 490 A (117)
Cltl 280 rvA 955A G IC) 949$
MlI 9495 9457 1$kV 1$kV 1$kV lskV ekv IIkV 1$kv DEAVVILLE Qs 5566 5565 552 I 4428 4125
~4 CC 40HL STREET Qs RONEY 44 5$ 1$
~lie 8$ ee 4$ $ $
8165 4574 4$ $ 4 4846
$ 60 CCVA
~14$
4I$5
~III 4174 f
4I6$ f <<ee 1
~ 146
~ 177 I
siss BUENA VISTA Qs 45511
)
elsre
~8
$ 5) 4$ $0 FENNSvco Qs MAULE S
560 ICVA D'A DE Q
4 g
~lo DADE 1$ KV WESTSIDE Qs 9$0 A (222) 900 A (21$)
Qs 81ALEAH ISKV 4KV N
AIRPORT QS
$0165 lonsl
$0155
$0185 o
4KV S
15KV le FRONTON~~
Qs Lb ST.
.~IC
. 'it+,
S Ct 44ct
~l MIRAMAR Qs
$0015 S0085 MARKET QS 1$ KV 1$ KV 1$ KV 8
~ltt 44tl 11557 11562'1551 11565 200 MVA MIAMI BEACH Qs VENETIAN IT922 17921 1$kV 18kV B
SI cc Cl C4 1010A (241) 745 A (IT8)
MERCHAND!SE~
Qs LE JEUNE Q
o
~4 C
LAWRENCE Qs llkV 7450 7455 4':
TO TURKEY POINT DAVIS FLAGAMI Sff SHEET-I Mo
~l ISKV tt$ $ 1 82845 22565 tt$4'I 22545 28594 RIVERSIDE Q
c (241)
Cl
'IO FLAGAMI 7425 7440 K
7420 7415 RAILWAYQs 8
Cl R
'L22'I TO COCONUT ~TO MIAMIPLANT GROVE S85A(212)
TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BREAKER DIAGRAM SHEET NO42 MIAMI DIVISION FLORIDA POWER 8 I.IGHT COMPANY JANUARYI, 1978 SHEET >
OF 8 E"40698
'1 0
~'I
2 K
c>8 BROWARD 56O MVA To RANCH cc
~ WES'IINCHOUSE
~ R 0
1290 A ($08) 1010A (241)'RYSTAL O
S ee N
c>
1290A Ood)0 I
1010A (24D 1010A (241 W!
~ IgMS MM64 44 j
48610 Ij46615 It<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
4 dd20
~kMMMMI4&
DEERFIELD BEACH Qs
$2841
$2815 Sidle
$ 2824 22841
$2825 CCO MVA e>
S SSMC 2>>1 2185 L 2115 P 2122
$2822 f
NH ee n
2111 [ ~211d
~2160 2>>1 1010A (Ml)
M C
QS 1010A (IH)
SAMPLE Qs ROAD FASHION PALMAIRE 1010 A (241)
~e C
c>
c>
Os C>
~c CYPRESS CREEK~
Os POMPANO OS c> <<
e>>
cc e>
~eeet<<
ELY Qs LYONS OS Hol.v cRoss Qs ce C
C>
MARGATE~
Os cc ROCK 156400 Os tc c>
C C>
R WOODLANDS Os
~:
I!
MALLARD Os ce HAWKINS O~
R C
5) 1290A ($08)
I)
I INEHURsT Qs QS 1290A
$08 Q
FORT LAUDERDALE ISSV 44215 46218
~46221 MYA W
560 4622
'4221 462$ d 44250 W
Soles 2>>$
20195 OAKLAND PARK Os ee 1010A (24O ee
~e VERENA Qs I
I 41 41X CD 414I lo hIOIOROIA Os DAVIE Os 8
8 C
A C
SI IMAGINATIO 0 8
MCARTHUR~
Os Os PLANTATION~
~e C>
C tt C
c>
FAIRMONTOs ROHAN Qs Os GAS TURBINE GENERATORS I - 12 1290A (108)
Qs PORT EVERGLADES PLANT 4
3
$5120 19015 19020 19016 19065 190Cd 19015
$5140 19025 19080 19058 19045 19024 QI C
280 MVA 1908l 280 MYA 1465 A (C09)
Os PORT (START UP) 190ld 19021 19055 19021 S
Os LAUDANIA 42414 19040 19095 19051 19065 c\\
cc t!
8 1465A D50) 129OA(526) 1290A(5$ 6)
O
>2R 0
$ 290A (5$6) e>8 O
R 224 MVA c>
MYA 224 1449 le 21 1265 lies 129e
~1292 Idle Id42 16$ 1f I21ef 1126 I 41 1112 1629 f lelSIf I265If 1>>e ISIOI tt ce 122d MVA E
560 MVA LAUDERDALE PLANT TO ANDYTOWN Cl To DADE TO BROWARD To FLAGAhtl R
I g
$2 C
12CC 1211 I
I
'I I
0 0
1186 1219 105$
1010 I
I 109d I
1015 1146 1080 a
8 m
LI 8
~$410 42420 12 - 24 GAS TURBINES GENERATORS ee tc Qs 040IA 4
6 2
8 I6$ 4 I
12 GAS TURBINE GENERA'IORS RAVENSWOOD~
Qs 9$0A (222 lole 1121 1254 IN 1066 1251 IS 5) ce START UP 1021 I
I0$6 120A (86) 1196 1154 I Ill 2S 1046 I
N.o.
I N.O.
I 1060 I
1010A 1065 1195 124l 1290 1241 5S, 900A (215)
O M
P.
8 Os
$14 10
$1415
$ 1420 820A '096)
MOFFETT 02 te cctc 820A (196)
RESERVATION Qs 1290A 08 PERRY~
Qs
~TO GRATIGNY~
c>
c>>
To LITT E RIVER IOIOA (241)
BEVERLY Os SEE SHEET Qs
~ PEMBROKE
==,,=:IK' HALLANDALE gI-= 0) 8 To ARCH CREEK To IVES Gg> YhOLDS To GREYNOI.DS PLAYLAND Qs Mhv HOLLYWOOD Qs 42Y STIRLDIG Qs 900A (215) 1010A (2ll)
TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BREAKER DIAGRAM SHEET N0.3 SOUTHEAST DIVISION FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY JANUARY I> 1918 SHEET S
OF 8 E-40698
'IBM
A
R VER
$060A (2650)
II-IS)
II)
(h (2) 48ll2 IS00 )4VA
$4.5 kV 4802) 48024
~ 802'I 2290A (526) 1290A (5$6) 20 RROWARD SLS
$LS
$L5
$7.5 SSVAR SIVAR MVAR MVAR ANDYTOWN Qs 129"A(5$ 6)
TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BREAKER DIAGRAM SHEET NO.4 SOUTHEAST DIVISION FLORIDA POWER (2 LIGHT COMPANY 4Q.6g8 SHEET 4 Of 8 TSM JANUARY I> 4928
t 0
2290A (052) 2290A ('052) 2200A (SST) 44 C
Cl 4402$
4491T SOUTH SUB.
(CITYOF VERO BEACH) ri BRIGHTON S65 4
S65 A (ill CI P-ewe OKEECHOBEE
's
<<v
~t
~4 QS PORT MAYACA 24652 24esd S
6515 eses 5026 24N6 2 ~ 6IS 24628 24441 246 t4495 MIDWAY Qs MARTIN (TEMP.)
M9$5 INDIAN OWN Qs 112 MVA 2444S 2474$
24651
~ 2 MVA.
2 ~ 445 247 I
24714 24741 24715 112 MYA loloA G2D N
SUB N CITYOP FT. PIERCE
$ 65A(44)
ISSY 2416 IOIOA (241)
SI II WHITE CITY OS
&6 HARTMAN (CITYOF E
FT.
FORT PIERCE)
PIERCE
$9120
$9125 Q
$0710 W
44920 44 C
a WEST (CITYOF VERO BEACH)
QS OSLO QS IHlTCIIINSON START UP IB II
~4 JzNSEN QS T
STUART OS
~U poRT szw.t.t. Qs
~,OLYMPIA)I 44v O
44 V
Jvl trzRQS lOSd7 40164 4028)
QS QS Qt 440855 losil 40MS 40252 40240 40MO l0$2$
40$2d E
. Os (0
II-IJj IJj CO IJj LL)
(0 Qs PAHOKEE Co Cl GLADES~P SOUTH BAY 15 MVA
'ls MVA ISAY 1010 A (420) 14$ A
~~ITS)
CLEWISTOV Qs C
Cl 44 Cl SSSIS S
O Cl FLOIVDA STEEL Qs 920 A 111)
I GVAKSROATS S
029
$68H Sldls
$6810 1$ ILV PRATT (I WHITNEY Qs
'IlS A (I'ld) 29S15 2958 pLUMOSUS Qs 2058 QS MONEY C
g 44
~4 JUNO BEACH QS Qt LAKE PARK Qs 1$ 4$6[ II466 11451 11486 t'lies 540 A 020)
B START UP 150 4
D JIVA 11452 11451 1140$
IIlid 11445 11492 ltles llltef tilts OE Tsit T$ 66 IS KV
'ltle 1851 7265 2576 2510 224 MVA 2516 25dS 2589 2544 E22555 2556 tM6 2520 200 MVA RANCH Q
1010 A (241) 1290 A ($08) 1200 A ($08) tl COo ACME~
Qs MILITARYTRAII~
Qs Cl PURDY LANE~
ts C tl a
tSSS L 2044 tSIS L
2SIS ISM 2541 f'S ~ I 2649 254$
I ~ante tSSS RI IERA PLANT 1200 A (lod)
~4
~4 C
Cl R
Qs wtslwARO 1010 A (241) 1200 A ($08)
NORTIIWOOD Qs t
Tzm~AL Qs C<<v ln V DATURA So 44 BELVEDERE~
Qs C
Cl 2$ 01$
25045 C
Cl 1010 A OS HILLCREST (241)
O O 44 YPOLUXO(CITYOF LAKEWORTH)
NORTON~4 TO PLANTSUB (CITYOF LAKEWORTH) 44209 44812 44MS 112 MVA tsois tsoss E
I It MVA 141$
1445 I~ 14 72 1444 1494 I~ $9 1495 "4KV WEST PALM BEACH Qs C
C 5$
O Cl O tl LANTANAQs BOYNTON QS Qs O
44 O
LINTON QS GERJLLMTGWNQs SANDALFOOT Qs
'IO BROWARD 1290A (5$6) tl Cl SEE SHEET-3
'T'o'AMATO Qs BOCA TEZCA E
$ 2416 1010 A
$ 2441
$2424 Q2 W
tl Ct Qs IBM fv 1010A (241)
Qs ATLANTTC~
Qs aov 44 TO BROWARD
~1010A Q
8 BOCA RAION~
(241)
CO tl HILLSBORO C
TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BREAKER DIAGRAM SHEET N0.5 EASTERN DIVISION FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY JANUARYI, 191d SHEET 5 OF 6 E-40698
J I
PAYNC~
Qs C
8
~4 role 0
QS ONECO~
Cog
<<44 Os WHITSICAO~
~4t4
~4 C
9$ 0 A (222) 9$ 0 A (222)
Q PALIIASOAA~
~4 C
COIITCC~
BRADENTGNQ5 rods 5<OA (129)~ SAUIT IIIOVSTAICS 9$ 0 A (222)
Ql lskv lskV 0 <kv 22220 2TTIS BDRDEN Qs 1010A
<20 To<oh (420)
Qs RUSIQN (TEC) g 4$ 2 451 esd PEDDLEDALE (IEC)
GILLETTE Qs ITS BIG BfND (TEC) 122 C
RVSIQN (TEC) 2580A (1022) Q 2$40A(lors) Q
$ 1952
$1901 f MANATEE PLANT START-UP 5195$
51929 51920 M950 51950
$1040 51942 51952 t4 C
cc OOOA 215 4>
~4 900 A (215) 900 A (21$)
Qs MYOC PAAR g
Os DENEVA 44 Qsckl-
~:o H
o Q
S OSPACY PMILLIPPIQS g
SARASOTA QST 900A (215')
SL4 MYAB SL< SIVAR 9$ 0 A (222)
OSOA (222) 9$ 0 A (222)
~$ 415
~~$ 4 I SNO M<9
~$892 C>
Qsrlunvnkc Q
seo MYA
~$ 050 serr
$ 841
$02r I
$845
$ 811 sd90 SN9
$<0 slvA E
RINGLING Qs N5 A BT8) 22 IMVA E
E oC II 2580A (1012) Q
$85<J ss<T
~4 sesA (<<)
DOER FIELD 5215 N.o.
csee ARCADIA Q
NOCATCC QS C>g CNILOS (eklo<s co opl ~hs sd5A (<<)
O
$ 55 A (<<)
II-U)
UjK CO UJ UJ SANIDELISLE (LEE Co OP)
CAPE COBAI (LEE Co-OP)
C>o Ct SN25 SS<1$
SS<SO 32<10 VENICE W loloA (2a) 9$0A g
9$0Ar (222) t (222)
COCOPLUM Qs
<<<<MURDOCK Qs g
C4 9$0A (222)
~ SOUTH VENICE QS o
g g
ENGLEWOOD QS
<90 A ($9)
I I
<TI2S
'5 J: <TRS i~ 41225
'TTN
$4
<<<<44<<
4 dillI 22<14YA w LAURELWOOD Qs
~!
g 25<<5 25490 t5 act 2 S 4 IS 25492 C
MVA 50 MVA
~4 CLEVELAND 25515 255<2 25555 I1'h N
25519 C
I I 14d920 11)449 5
~ 48925 I'I<49$$
44 ~
25554 IP 4
<d9$ 0
---<>>gr-I MMMI 25522 J
IIIMVA $
CHARLOTTE Qs Cs I
'idol (9$)
BURNt SIOBE ROAD (LEE Co OP)
TROPIC ISLE T80A (LEE CO.OP) 280A (90) 212 MYA I.EE SUB DEL PRADO G EE ~P)
(LEE Co OP) dred C
g sesA
~4 d lie PUNTA GDRDA8 eles 4>
1$KY~
g ~ DAYSMORE g
4>
(LEE Co-OP) 1010 A (2<1)
'l45A (I'I8)
SUNCOAST (LEE CO.OP) 1010A (2EI)
T4$A (ITS)
Lh BELLE Qs
$ 5$ A (4<)
<90 A Qs ORTI Z
~
595A (TI )
TIOC g
50M No. I srcllr VP 2<40 5 ~ l4 Nel 5 ~ IS NORTH FORT MYERS (LEE CO.OP) g
<d. 8 MVAR
- 40. 4 MVAR 2 402 I
No. 2 22<
START VP MVA
$<N
$ <M
~$450 N92 Ndl S<98 N92 S2TSO N58
$2TT'I t SESS 50 MYA t FORT MYERS
$2$ 55 ssrrs SSTS9 SSTTO Ssrls
$215E
$2215
$2TIS sere 22<
PLANT MY 1010 A (<20)
GAS TURBINE GENERATORS I
IS T<5 A (lrd)
FORT MYEBS SVB Qs 5<0 A 629) 4 COLONIAL~
ps
~4 4
1010 A (241) Q C>
w UCKINGHAM 1290A (SSS
)
20 8
$9024 4 <024
$901$
S 9020 44 Qs EDISON~
C>
Ct Qs E
4>
ero A (100)
<4224
<d215
<estd 1500MYA GRANGE RIVER S
4>
A C
C>
Qs NOA(129)
TRANS M IS SION S Y ST EM BREAKER DIAGRAM SHEET N0.6 WESTERN DIVISION FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY JANUARY I> IOTS SHEET 6 GF 8 E-40 698 1290A($08)
Qs EsTEBo Q
DONITA SPRINGS PINE RIDGE
~4
~4 I
Qs soLANA C
4>
co 4C4 11215 QNAPLES 29221 2921T C
C>g LEIBGNQQRS)S
~ IMMOKALEE (LEE Co OP) 8 CABNESTOWN (LEE CO-OP) 29210 <
29242 g ill<0 9$ 0 h (222) 8 P<<4<<CAPRI 44
~BELLE MEADE g I ~
( LEE Co-OP )
~ MARCO NORTH
( LEE CO.OP )
COLLIER W
g~ ALLIGATOR OS so<oh (2050)
TOANDYTOWN SEE SHEET 4
~
J
8690'-3 Gdo 4 L33HS LNvdWOS LHSIl S) 83Mod Y0180ld OLn 'I Aavnxvt NOISIAIO HVAR J.N30 HJ.BON CON J.33HS W()(890'IO 83>I@388 W3JSAS NOI SSIWSNVB J.
J,SSM OL ps
-
OSSVGYAI (LS) V OCL Qs oonlw
<S-J.33HS 33S (LS) Y OCL telic YAN SL
<Lst) Voce Qs O'8 8'YlYW YAN OCC
<LSc) vote Qr S
QC 81$ ) Y 0101 S III0 SOIIC
$0 0 I 1 tools (CSS vsoo (cen Ysos Qs Iioaavn Hvi<nrr Qs xnnlJvd ~
(9$9 Yols~p (ses Y019~T (oen voto'~+
QS xzAI8 YNYHYG a
C>
8 PS 00000010)I xrlvd auvaaorr Qs 8
ommvrosa Qs Q
A)t C I Slllss AT>~
CSIIC Ncc) Tote esse SSBC 9 IIIC gp Qs Sans<Girl~
=-h O Qs TTOTAT~
==-I!
SOOCI (9$ 1) YON 000$ I Qs 31llvs nv3 TAIIC II 1101$
tl0 I 1 9101C OOOIC Qs Hnvza Yahoo HLGOS noc) Y 0101 SI9$ I
$ 99$ I 8
C)
~4
$ 1$ 11 91$ 11 99$ 11 SSCII s
HOV38 voooo
<L
~lt
~e (9$ 1) Y Ots (CN) VSSe Qs xzzan saxhs ON>
Y 0101 Qs anaalXOOII (NC) Y 0101 T0000 Qs 1011) V 0101 OC (Odd)
MTT010)I Qs ooooc 0 HLnos CSSSC'IOSC 9199$
Qs vxvordo)IJ AX Cl S
vhwsor (icr)
Ytte Q
IIIIOS Allo
($11) V OCL Qs Jvxz Janon Qs axva uvaan (CLI) Y OCL Qs 08YA388 0000 I toot l YAN Oor Slotl YAN OLI 0 I OS I teltl CCISI
$9NI SONI ICISI SIISI 00)tl SONI OSIS I Olltl ll.ltl (Odd) 8 xaarrn so)Ivo Ct so C
trol 0l0l S
OIOCC Q
3dvo HL80N 010CC 9lecc Qs Vt Zs 91$ CC (oor) vsos (cos voto Oltsc Qs 9-0 09TCC (Cor) Y OCO WOSSINS 9109$
cr (C91) Y CCS CO SA-LSTIS Qs 3
YOCS YANStt SOSIC OISIC ITtlt 9ttlc S IS I I
$ 1$ 1C tet)0 OCSIC Osort CSOIC
($01) voter YAIC9tt 119it 0YxaJXO)ld Qs (SL'I) Y S'11 Qs LNVld lV83AVNVO 3dVO NOIC LLOIC 9COIC ISO IC SOS IC
$091C
$1SIC 9L91C LCOIC ILSIC 9101C
$ 191C (9CS) Y OSCI Oc
<odd)
S3lvM 3Xvl LS3M Qs Sleet ONIS80 OSOCC Q
aaAIa Hvr<nrr LOL (ono) 83A18 N'YIONI COL (9CS) Yster
($91) Y Ots (Lsc) vote Qs SWIW CI
~A 9$ 111
$$111 CSLII 1$ 111 NtlI YAN SL 01111 00911 VAW SL Qs S) 880N S
S N
(OC1) YOIOI (odd) aooh)oxm 8Jxox Sosll Qs LNVld 080dNVS (ssr) v oce lO 40o Ctot Stot
$10$
clot ICOS SLOC
$90$
eeoc 190C eeoc YAN$91 OS Malh<cxvxo ps s
YANCol t
TLIC c Jrxn s YOsu~n SXYIIJ dn JHYJS dil JGYJS 0 IIS SSIC C'11C (sn) vote
<ssi) v oce
($01) Vote lilt aaodxvs SIIC
$91$
4II
'P Co Ct OSOO
<Odd) 8388nL 8-J.33HS 33S Yrsl'lOA OJ
<Lxvaaa or,
N 4
0
'4 r
'>>~A 8690'-3 B do Q L33HS NGJ erer 'I ABVGNYC ANlfdWOD LHSll 9 83MOd VOI801d NOISIAIQ N83H J.HON 8'ON L33HS WVHOVIO 83>IV388 W3 J.SAS NOISSIWSNVHl.
l.-3.33HS 33S SIBBON OJ, GBOJNVS OL, Qc Qs Nov39 YNOLAvo SSLC
~>>o SBLC Slf C g
>>>> o o
Qs YNOLXVG 8100$
o Ct (YNBANS IIIZNdp AJID)
YNBANSMZN Baxvmaooa (SL) Y SSt BDYZG QS Ba1OY1J QS M01nn hstr OIHLO3'l3 SI SIC IY83N3S sstrc Q
Qs NOSIGYIS (YNlULNSISBN do AJID) ~S VNHAWS OCCSl (IOC) scsst ntsl Yolo'I BCOI,S Wort IIOLC (CL) V SSC eroLC
~>>o (cr) vest ZONYBO 180d QS 4tIBI ttICI
<<IIII s 113NNne
g 3
QS SYZNYJYN 3
Qs ONOW80
>>o 8
QS g
ONINZ'Id S
Nlr) Y SBL
'lllH A1>OII 994tt Cse'lc Qr lsll)Y SBL N
YAN OLC oI 0
vlsn1oh YAN OLC Beett 944tt SietC ttett 1<<691 LSSBC
<<t4tl tNtt
'leett 999 ~I ectlc f9etc OtstC N
ha tl GNVIZG SISC SSSC
<<BSC Qs ON'lf130 (Btl) YSlL (Ioc) v olol (Oct) v oror Qc (OCI)VO10I 0
'O (sl) volt (CL) Y$9$
(ao'OD Ay'ID)
)I8'Ifd (do ODAY1D) VNOWOd YNrlSLYS (SL) YSSC 0
(roc) volor Qsv ZNIJsnonv 'Js (dp-OD AY'ID) 8JBON XBYd ZONYBO (tr> Y <<sc QS 60 IC
'0 'N (ao.oD xv1D)
JJZNNODSZIII CI J.NV1d WVNIAd CJOI IIOI JSI JSC IJOC CJOC 2,2, (Ddxl LS)f3 ONV130 (do OD xvrD)
GNONNYH (ao-OD AV1D) ortlytlh
~>>
YOLS (do OD AVID)
Nhroxaoaozo SONIJSYH 0
C (dp OD AVID)
(do OD AVID)
AIZIABZAIB SJBDIZH ldo OD)
ZN01S A'ZX (AY1D)
SNOB Y801d (09)
(do OD AVID)
GOOIIIZOGM (ao.oD)
(ap.oD AVID)
(AVID)
BZXOOBG GNY18 (do OD AVID)
SSN18dS 3AOON338S Lccrs ster<<
I SICH OSCIS I
I (ao.oD AVGD)
SDNBMS 1'IYS (ao~ AY1D)
JSZAA ZBIVIZG ooo (os) oe (os)
O (Oe) Vols (do OD XY1D) hect YAN <<C NO<<lad GBOJIYB (do 00 Ay'ID)
L3 )NI S,HOLOOO (ZBYdt)
('ldd)
YAN9S '0'N (do OD AVID)
SLHOIZB Z111ANOSXDYr YOL9 VOLS YOLS VOL9 o
'NYBL 'urv 'SZB I I
I I
(dp 00 AVID)
SONIBdt NOLOIGHJBOAl (BB) YOL9 I>>
>>>> o (ao OD xv1D) -
9 ZDBnaa1GGIN o
ONBIZJZN xa10NDI OC (SN)vslL ZOGI81lv81 Qs LN)f1d Sf>li)f1)fd steel
) <<1st 914c YANS9II
<<994C Sel Ielec ssec SSSC OI4$
SBSS
('Id1)
YAN9$
(do'OD Ay'ID) 83A18 M3N SNSC 9194 sctec I
sttec Srser I
I Llec tlet stec lrdc VAN SS'I SSSC I
Nc g
g oo>>
SSSC yhrt Ol 966C 9SSt i<<SC (dp OD AVID) aNBoBJMvlr Ea g S Qs vxJvrva Jtva (a~ AV1D)
(dp.oD AVID)
(do 00 AVID)Z11rhg.'VtN (
)
Z$081ZN SIDNYBJ Y'ID dyJ l,>ICL)Y Sst
>>g g ZNBOHJAIYB (BW LI LI BVANOC BYANOt Y <<IL QsvxJvrva o
Nosonu 0ILCC (Slr)
Y OCL
(<<lr)
Y OCL 9
YOCL NZIIDVIBZJNI 3
(do&D AV1D) dvJ, XODBN
'Jd Y 0'IC 0<<sl I>>
g 0$
SL<<l
<<1st OB<<l 91st (SLI) YSIL Qs 388VLS AII69 l<<sl 14$ 'I YAN 9<<
(Olt) Yolol rlnrNVJIJ (do'OD AVID)
Aootrs Jd (do 00 Ay'ID)
SI.I.IIBO o
(ocl) v oror QS 31)f03SNV80 Cto (val)
ON)flN338S 9xtce sce.lce SJsre CCOIIC VAN OOC g g8 II ASIMB'1 9
g go YANoot Qs 98OdO)f89 BvhNot LJ (Ctr> YOLS VI
-9 $
gs 1)fnno orssr I'ISS'I (Oct)Vorol (SON Y Ols (Bor)Vols 999 ~
Ssst
<<Itt Oc<<SI (Oll) yhN QS NIMS1 ye Yolol OOC VI S
8 I G1vn1aa JS (Boo Yols MBMnlto SISSC SSSSC IN6$
(SL) vs04 Sr<<et (Ott)vorol C'1$4$
Cs<<SC (ap-pD AVID)
Z1'IIAXVN Vole YSIL YSIL ANNZGDDVN YSBL
>>>>o (dp OD AVID) azoonNZ Jtfl1 YANOS
~
s sf e(s I
I (do 00 AY1D)
NOSBZGNYS I
H I
(Bol)
(Bll) (Bl1) (Ill)I (SC) Volt SICtc All Ls LCCCC (SN)
(BN)
VSBL V<<BL VIGNn10D hatl QS
$9CCC
<<sett 0$
v)ewn1oo BYAN tl 'ByhN sr stctc 3
YAN 9S YhN91 (60 VOlt d'll1, XVOahl'I I>>
IS 9 xyo Jsva Srcor 0 N (SC) Y OlC IItoSell
$ 16
( Yac) 938O)f OOOMN1908 Sce 094 (vac)
AONVWHON (ao.oD xamvh ZZNNVMns>
h
>J
'I N
Iffttlr r PtttC Ce <vrC Sc
~ '
r4eeeretreeee C
i
~
I I
I I ffe I reH~TC I
I I
I I
I I
I cavjrne herc'r I
rttt'fcttfy I I d<rntteeeW
~vrie I
-'Cvr>t I
ve' 5
DuI755lI I
Sh Out~
I Cr'u+Cnlh I
l3Rhflftrfp I
e TQ
~ I
~
e i
erernr I
S trtvhrrn'1'n 7hMyh hgclt cd SIC VOX SPArtpg
+$v CtrttphL f'trredh ocdnly
~tel.tr L ~ eeseeee
~
- pl i
I
,I~
'frlHtlh I
I,i
~ trt Ir. 7 fneeerr, <<
RI" prie/
ee s
OetOOAIItr<<
i e
I I --'
ttfe,'I tet 5 5 r r et r ery II5' I
I I
ee I
tl y hN(iifC
~t LhrL I nnyrtt efIICL teee>>
C ICntn hrCR ghSf V.
Otlftfeht I
I I ttett tet Onl~<(
I
+IIhgfrett I
ertef>>
ST CV+ It IQ5 6C<
GIC IICotD Z,T fiu C
Wyr.r Oil IO I rzhLCS f5hgtrere 5hrr Dhvt C Of I
r tt ~
rfC (pherrrdrr t
ff'Iitr Oni C jt ee i
PItt Rfflluoy I
floRrllSIDS I
i.
I i
aeter>>e.e I
&Rrreeeee rrrnnee r-nenrrn
~ 8VtrrtCIL I
tf=et erg tnrvO VDLu@h I
I K>.>>
5y7tgtve~e o+ 1frirh
~I Dglh/fb J
IfrthIS i
c el Nr e re e I f ele pe IIgrvhRO I
I I
Mt O lech 5t 7I tert 0 5 u 5 e
R IVIC'RlI V
e st ~ed I
I Avfh.
e
~~N~P I~ Inrnnru
~ PCCRFIFLD
~
tI CeVM h R Ip e
gteIC CIH C.
\\j
~
I I
I
'PCrteCC CIIh.rlLrjly'
~
Pf lngEXS
'IP( 7trlTC>
I I
I I
frag I r Idretr5 I
CP+
~ LhvftEIIDhLE.
."4 I
I rr. LnerOCWOht C i g I
I I
oRA ltc.c.'IIVCN
~v rr'aPR u DADE PLjlSAPIr e
hp +
I LPneOrev4
~<
~
e yrfrfyiret05 Ii' I.I I
.I L lI 4r tr WII gtfogu IISKVrtI IS/A'<
JC R.
P>7III C>l I t lg j)AVIS 7uF K+'/
Polhl7
~.
NIAOII I
4~m
k I
I C f>>>j cr-<o( I:
SC Hc((l I'4Kejr hj 5 v >unhrrfg fht(tt'>t, hgtnE>t D >L uof 5 Pr>rrgg
+$v C fHrfnl ftort>OA w>ooh(I('('>(t" jtcnss f ~2'f ivji r, rj To E-
- I
, a>r>>(cy I
I >>
C,
(
~
I ccr>vrj>(rcj O
(
(
J, I(ffj
( <<>>jlE g
~
I I
I I
I I
~
I lultf ~
( 5g~c(vj~
>>re (>
I SEE>>
I rr s
tSRhtIFÃD srh BK(=
(
I
~
Ocgr(ty
~ > ~Jtrc ljvvjrjj(
iCchi'.,
~ (g(EE g(c p(ny v, rp I
(
I Ja>
Tjr,>j>1 Irt I
I s(5
~~>
, I I
(j L> g Du IchI I
I5h LD>>r(H LoLu5((5(h lIoRIMHDp' IIOPrllSIDS
(
(.
I r>j>jrj jjj I
or.>e>>jj>>
rvrr >rj ra-inrrn
~l
~
I og (>cj>o
~
(
Uo( (>S(n l
I Ko.~ Syr(a>>q J.
J I
Nvfr((5 c>j(of c n rrr>v l tr>(
f h>rt TE Lh >tf.
7>( r(frH g IIELoa g>I ER
<'I s>>D(nH C IEAoc'nrElt Ehst lr>>rt.o V.
I>II>t>H I
I >(> >I fr(
I l
I "4hgr.~
I
>rot>>
<<SE oil(0 J
(c
$0 r(E>nHh Dh4v>n shHDHrt L c 1.
r>> AO Gr( jrr(c>r>
(
AM(f.0n((.
('>>r Eg Q(fr BEHD r>IC(HrtrE:L f>(>(fL(HC-I I
~
I
~
I I
VC>(>LE Edna'LCTrr No/7o wH Pf n(gERS t
(
J Qj
~
CR >o
>l>>rt(gg 4 ~f(S I
(~ yno(nr>s DEggn(EL D, CI
(.(
I I
fr. LhuOE %DALE t'oh'r
('v'G>opcs I
I
((04 (I y LA>(OEtIP/Ig.g I It"
~
I T c>lS i
i I
QE>vnR D I
I I
t> c 5 c>> ~ c t(h> r>yh t I
Q~~
coat((
o> > D >jrj>> g ~
f( >jr(o $ u S
'ghHf n
RIVEfI pApE'L/6APII Lh>>O(j>j>h ) Dotyn>>DS (yrI,'I I
I I
l
>'i rcv LR incr LD gctoK(r IIS'KV ort I'SIE<
J(R nIIIItEl(
I5hVIc(
7(jgK ".g po InI 7 H(hH I
(
@4' "rLrt
5 ut<>j)>IN<ra Ph her>4 hRch c>f 5<a vcR fPt<ttltfg I
I I
I I
I I
Chron IIO <u I
co Sr
~h I ~Ih<<<PCS>><<lr I
~<>>IIr 5RVr>t I
Cf Irft>f>II C rtttfht floh<On O <OOh fit n<
lrf"ncnSS< o>>
f >ry fff.ftlr ro PI>Id 6-I crt:
5c sc I
h h
ro f - I
<fulrcy I
I I
I
'e>>if<If<<r I
I
) pr.
) rf<tffc OIJ If/II 5h'-."<Ofn Cptuf)jth 6 4 h tIPVR0 STA l:K+
~(J, ocdklr
>>fr,fo L~ i>><f>~)
I'il
>IIf.'R lqor P. I Rtr ptt>'P u
.P7 I I
~LI +
~t I I
I
- ILS,
'7<f!r< Ih I
I I
I II.'
~
I>>
f 1 I
I
~
1 I
<5~=P PI o R Jj/I HO/l I
~ ~>>1oP,TII 5IPE I.
I f
I 3~
t<f<ff>>f.>
I el<>nf>f>
llrff>>i rn-fnrnn 1
8<trrctc, oR>poO I
~
I Volt>SIA I
I ttr:f Syf<KII+$
>>rfItch I DctlSlfb I
IJrfR)<
Cliff
)'*ff>>l Ctcnf nrcA Enjr szfl V
I SISS<fr>N I
IIf<dry th)(
cv.'I chKg I h hill<
5IIECOnr>
~ I I
- IIC, I
ff7 RrOthlt P<VER M/P;r I I /Ihf I fun<.CS ffPtnft n
~
I Oh aft> < h Sh >IO Jlt It
~l cf I
P<I O ~
tfl<tl<C' I
ftd St f.fntc osc 1Y l
f+
T ol5
~
\\
~
~.5 IIÃfvhgl0 I
I~J>c T-c><pc Oththgh f g~h cofjcft r< I O>>fh St ~
p< Otto 5 u 5
<ltulEIIJI g Q f
CKZ <r 4 <<PIS.
I I
I tjhRfrol
<t<>foST<VER Q Ifr f>C Jt 0 PIH JIHTCi II/Iu c. H I~ ynofAre
~ PECgFIRL0
~<c ~ > < 1 RI<c Itffl-')
I I
I I
I hA VC>ffcC I ~I*
I Ctfn7iply I
F P. os)E/$
I t.(
oRP>PJ C.n IIIV'f>r~
5.clot)i flu'v ox I+gul JCR J IJIJI cH I 0 7
P/I OE FL/I6APSZ i)hvl5 7 vs K c'Pf Po/,Vr 0P I
I ct. t t<VSdhfhtt rp t<Y I I'C<n)rj I
S h<< Ot<>>+<A
~~<~f J~
) QftcydsaOS 3<
hf $
(
I+)
I I
f I
IIS 5
O< I>t<H I I
4~~
cur LfR 6)/
I
.I.I I
~
I t.8 fr<dr Iljf f
I aff4 I
I. ~ t.g<IDEPI P/ILg I j fa
<OAPIIRi 3ttt st RCCS5 I rst C
~r si Dutr/II SALL IH I
gnLVPIQlh IJRAOFVPP I
~
I I
~
Srh RIIC 0(dlcy' sshtt Lsn>,vs>I P
. IlhuP,,
tst If'ir piÃis>>
Jf 5
.~t
~l I I
I I
,I rc Tr.tnt th
( '
I I
I I
L-'ttic>>f LAKg TAAfnrt st IIELrnv I
~
fC I
C t Ehtn bring fhsr Inrl st ~
IIIu T>>V I
I I tl>RI>t I
+tsh RtIset I
vtst v sr PHto st Ctntt A 1
0h 'S I nn tIn I
54HDlet L PP PII 1 I GAsrlcOtt I
Pl'51<<hnt e QIG REHO Wf;I
. I CII Psr Putts,g 5 rsf Ft H It.trE:e ItioC ttttt'-
iA I
I I
I I
I kh VCII'c.E I
CttntLoTTI At)jdwll pp. Pc)EIT S os uGtr PIVEItl OA DE' L>61I IhZ Ss>K>
y, cloKu Iftt rt PtttC C.r 'I I:
SC I
s s sc I
P h
-I~
I
~
tstntssl>C ~ rstl C
I r I
I I
~~ ~
I Frs t>st>TE I
I
-+Fr I
I I
I I
Rtti'rIIS Cstr Crt>
Itsrttr I
I I
Cs,>hrt rent
~ht ~t
't>ptgPs I
I IS>tssntsrs>>r I
srvr>t I
I rtslt>H Sit
/'Pi,
)to IP, IMHIPy' t
~s IIog yli S IPS P
I I
I g.>sn
..s I
gt S>n ss II s p>rssnss-rnsnsnn
~l~ ogP>rvo I
I I
VoLIPSIA I
I I>
I IKP.~ SynRHg
>>fttttn I
SARtrg D I Ofthlftt J
I I IIrJR IS cllrr '
rhHnvfRAL.
I I
rrhT Cr'g,t>srS I
I I
tI I'
l nS>n>>>ntn>h Ad '
II:Ps Qn
,v-I GCty'HcaOJ APQ t
I I
I lit
~ I I
I khtr tty f ~
psts g ORS QCruntt 0 I
I I
I> C PIAInoh l Mt ts Wh 1 'L Cccnptup L- - -
it Vlt'itp CVZ >C I
I tIi}ucH I~ yn~nro
~ pggltftfLD I
I t't.Ln>PSK<thtf >
I I
Iljh'VPA I)I/tv JW FIIIR EH I')7g Qhtrl 5 Tugg~g s
pclhPI I I
4=mb
APPENDIX D Total Generation Chart Relay Settings (Fort Myers Ranch)
R-X Diagram Phase Relays (Fort Myers Ranch)
Matt-Var Diagram Phase Relays (Fort Myers Ranch)
l l
I l I ! i i I OCG
!! 35,0 1 jj i
4o"i" I I'I 50CO 55CO 5000 6500 j li 7000 i
7opu C)
I 6 A'a'IATTS 35CO 4000 50M 7000
~ w q'0 40 3pc t.iEQAVIATTS ill 3500 II i
4000 50CO II I
7000 I
~
7500 3000 MCGAVIA'iiS 3500
~
~
i 40t'~s i!!
450 50K 5oCO Iamb'""
~.
~
e
sg a
OATE 12/10/76 PL-435 FLORIDA POWER 8 LIGHTCOMPANY PROTECTlVE RELAYSETTINGS STATION FT.
MYERS CIRCUIT FT.
MYERS-RANCH 240kV COMPANION PANEL PB-128 Indicates change from specified settings dated Circuit Impedance:
11.17 +j 77.27 Ohms Carr ier Channel Frequency:
106 kHz
": 007 Ratio: '000/5 PT'Ratio:
2000/1 CLPG Relay is DUAl Pol ar ized,,
A as J~\\
CEY Phase Carrier Trippin ReLa Model Number:
12CEY54A1D.
Range:
1
- ~0 Onms Settings:
Basic Tap: ~ Ohms Approximate Restraint Tap:
18 %..
Reach:
20:0 Ohms Augie:
CEB Phase Carrier Blockin Rela Model Number:
12CEB52A10 Range:
1 - 30 Ohms Settings Basic Tap:
3 Ohms Approximate Restrain't; Tap:
12%.
Ohms Reach:
0-5 Angle:
9o'hms Reach:
~2 ~ Angle:
240 Ohms Reach: ~2.60 Ang'le: ~20
'HC Phase Carrier Fault Detector Rela Model Number:
12CHC12A2A Range:
2
8 Amps Pickup:
2 Amps A
~s CLPG Ground Carrier'Rela Model Number:
12CLPG12ClA Range:- Gl 0.4 " 1.6 Amps G2 ~0.
- 2.0 Amps
- Settings:
G1 Pickup:
0.4 Amps G2 Pickup:
0.6 Amps GD Pickup:
~0.2 ixl ~ ~6 Exl GD Test Amps With Coil in Series:
0.5 00 Test VA P Unit Power Factor:
20.7 CEB Out-Of-Ste Detection Rela
~3 Range:
~30 Ohms g 75'ettings:
Approximate Restraint Tap:
1(P/,
Forward Reach:
26.0 Ohms
,Angle:
75' Backward Reach:
4.0 Ohms-Angle:
255'ELAYS SET AS SPECIF IEO By Date FORM 3102 REV. 3/75
1 x
J
~
~
~ D I
~
~
=- ~"
~
~
=I t
~
~
~'
I
'I
~
=-
HRl
.'. '====--"-'28
~.,;-..-..Ai'hHCX+:--'.;
\\
'I
~ p
+
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
. ~
~
~
...,.......I....,..
~
J
~
~
I
- ~
~
I
~
~
+
-* ~
~
~
v J
~
~ tv
~ I
~
~
v
- .:--.'===::=-;::.;===:--'.:=.
=::::...=,'.=.:=::..:=i6k,w8 i7=.'..ceaFw
'I c
=
'BUM Q%~-:-
<<- ~ I
~
L
~
r D
~
I ~ ~
~MZKKVM I
I t
~
1
~ D
~
\\
t D.
t.
l
~
I
~
~<<
~
~ t
~.
~
t ~ --
. ~ ~ ~
~ ~
I
~
I t
~
~
I tI
~
I
~
't
~
~
~
JD
~
I -
~
~
F,T.AYERS l
II
""-.t=:
. t2:::.lb==2K=="====~
~ ~
~
I l
~
~
J I
I ~
I
~v I
~
t I
I
~
3BVID.,
t' E:
I ~ ~
~
~ -
~
- ~
~ ~
~
<< ~
~
~
I
~l I
D
~
I
~
~'
~
~ ~
I
'I
\\
I
~
~
I ~
~ r
~ . ~
~ 'r
~ - ~
~
t
~
~
I q
~
+
~
I
~
4
>> ~ ~
I
~
I
~
D I
~ ~
I
~ '
~
+
~
I
~
~
~
~
I ~
t
~
~
' ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
t
~
~
~
~ w t
~
'=-=<UZLl I ~
~ ~
I
~
I t
~
~
t
~ ~
~
' ~
~
t
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~~
~
~ ~
I I
I
~
I
~
I
~
~
~ -'
- ~ ~
I I
~
~ 4 t
~
CHARACTEpj$jjCS POP P)~c."
Re~iyS UNE FD ~<~ ~R~c. e 2,e n mv TERM}MAL F3 W (FR~
BASED ON SETTINGS DATED..iX >~-~
DRAY/N BY
i4 4
ZO X 20 TO TIIC INC(lt 7 X 1<g gg<GIILS f
E-
~E KCggt'I'l.l. It> fSSLII CO.
>taoc guu,ua, 46 l242
~ ~g.Lj (gg<
I I
~ ~ ~
ll;i II(I lit
~II I ti)l
'(H'-I-'g(<
~ I
~
g -.~
g I ~ >>
I
< ~
g I{II
}i(i
!I'
~
~
~
'il,
't I
>I Ij, I
~ t
'qJ l'<'ll i:;I
~
L I I I )
!(
~
~ gt
~ t
~
< I I<> ~
,g il t }'I' I
IIII,}
gtt ([
~ If
~
I I l'l tl(l t<
~it I!g ~
~ ~ III (5(i
>>>>g.(<.
~
~
~ g
~ I
>lg ~
I
~
T gt I >
g
> ~ ~
~
il':!
~
~
I ~
>I"
> ~ 't t
~
~
~'I
'L
)jl
.<l I ~ ~
gl t
i<ll
>ugl'I
> ~ (
>gti il}l l
I;I':I C ~
~ tl
~
I i
~ gI;i',
Rt
~ l
~
'ill
[lj(
fiji I}
I
~
~
~
- lg
!.'lllII
> at.+
g(I, l (li
- lqI:
~ I '.
~I~tI
~
I I~
I~
}I dq I}
~ 'I jt
> i g I ilt I
gu I
g
~
h1 ti, I!i (II
~
~
~u
'."I
~ >I g'll "II i",, I
~ ~4>>,':
c l,l
~ r
('j:
l,i}i I'(
g f I
(g ll.
LIMNI I
I
~
~
(
~ I
, ~
~
< ~
> ~ ~
~ r I'll I.",I'('>"'gl
!I r 4
', l l!
';.Ii l>gl
- g 1 "'
~
I.I g
II:.t I(ij ill Ot I;,:
i ~ t
- '~ g >
! II f'I:
I
~
(I
~
I J}
~ i
}',
g]
I I
(I I >
li
!JAN jl(j 1
gl il II i.l t
TYPE GCY PHASE CARRlER HHO RELAY CHARACTERlSTIC AT 240kV FT, HYERS-RANCH 240kV LlNE FT.
HYERS TERHINAL CNW/HHP/0J S
!I
!}tI
-;< I
~ I
~ t
. I lg>g
~ <
~ ~
~ t l"I'(
I>
~ I ~ >
it
~ I
~ ~
t>t
~ ~
0 r+g J