ML17279B009
| ML17279B009 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Columbia  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1987 |
| From: | Sorensen G WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
| References | |
| GO2-88-097, GO2-88-97, NUDOCS 8805020349 | |
| Download: ML17279B009 (55) | |
Text
~ s ~ ~ v I C C
' ~
AC CEISMTED DI IBUTION DEMONSTRATION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION D T BUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:8805020349 DOC.DATE: 8 v>sm NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
- Washington Public Power Supply System SORENSEN,G.C. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
SUBJECT:
"Annua'l Environ Operating Rept for 1987."
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE25D COPXES RECEIVED:LTR t ENCL
)
SIZE: 5 TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)
NOTES RECIPXENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPXES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD5 LA 1 0 PD5 PD 1 1 SAMWORTH,R 5 5 INTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 AEOD/DOA 1 1 AEOD/DS P/TPAB 1 1 ARM TECH ADV 1 1 NRR/DES~ADE 8H 1 1 NRR/DREP/RPB 10 4 4 gggO 01 1 1 RES DEPY GX 1 1 RGN5 FILE 02 1 1 RGN2/DRSS/EPRPB 1 1 EXTERNAL: LPDR 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 A
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 'ENCL 21
C ~ ~
oo SUPPLY SYSTEH NUCLEAR- PLANT NO. 2 ANNUAL ENVIRONHENTAL OPERATING REPORT 1987 WASHINGTON PUBLIC PONER SUPPLY SYSTEH APRIL 1988 8805020349 87123i PDR ADOCK 05000397 R DCD
J
~0 0~
~
'ABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Introduction .
Unre vi ewed Envi ronmenta l questions Cooling Tower Drift Studies.
Nonroutine Reports . 2 NPDES Permit-Related Reports . 2
INTRODUCTION The WNP-2 Environmental Protection Plan (Appendix 8 to Operating License No.
NPF-21) addresses the protection of nonradiological environmental values dur-ing plant operation. Section 3.0 of the EPP requires that changes in plant design and operation be assessed for environmental impacts against the impacts which were projected by the NRC at the time the plant was licensed. Changes which involve an unreviewed environmental question (defined in the EPP) must be approved by the NRC. Section 4.0 requires the reporting of events which may result in significant environmental impacts and also requires a soil and vegetation monitoring program to evaluate cooling tower drift impacts.
Section 5.0 addresses administrative matters and requires an annual report on several EPP conditions including the monitoring program. This Annual Environ-mental Operating Report is submitted per Section 5.4.1 of the EPP.
UNREVIEWED ENVIRONMENTAL UESTIONS A proposed change, test, or experiment is deemed to involve an unreviewed
,environmental question if it concerns: (1) a matter which may result in sig-nificant increase in any adverse environmental impact previously evaluated in the environmental licensing documentation; or (2) a significant change in effluents or power level; or (3) a matter not previously evaluated in the environmental documentation which may have a significant adverse environmental impact (EPP Section 3.1). No design or operational changes, tests, or experiments in 1987 involved an unreviewed environmental question.
COOLING TOWER DRIFT STUDIES Section 4.2.1 of the EPP requires a monitoring program to assess the effects of cooling tower drift. As in previous years, soil and vegetation samples were collected in Hay at four grassland (G01-G04) and five shrub (SOl-S05) sites (see Figure 1) and analyzed for relevant chemistry parameters. Analyt-ical methods were described in the Environmental Operating Report for 1985.
The results for 1987 and comparisons with previous years are summarized below.
Soil Chemistr Results The results of the 1987 soil chemical analyses are presented in Table 1 and ar'e shown graphically in Figures 2 through 18.
Soils at all sample sites range from sandy to sandy loam and contain a low percentage of clay. Soil pH values were generally lower than measurements in previous years (Figure 2). Soil conductivity was higher at all stations over 1986 and was the highest ever measured at Station S03 and S05 (Figure 3).
oO OO As in 1986 soil sulfate concentrations at all sites were low (Figure 4).
Calcium (Figure 5) was within the range of measurements for previous years except at Station 601 which was lower than ever recorded. Magnesium (Figure
- 6) was within the range of previous measurements and showed little station-to-station variability. Sodium (Figure 7) and potassium (Figure 8) measurements were generally higher than in 1986 but still lower than the preoperational period. Except for Station S05, measurements of bicarbonate (Figure 9) were within the range of previous measurements. Soil fluoride and chloride (Figures 10 and 11) were general.ly. higher in. 1987 than in 1986.. The, highest.
chloride concentrations since commencement of the monitoring program were recorded at Stations G03, G04, and S04.
Relative to the 1986 data, soil copper (Figure 12) was higher at four stations (603, S01, S03, and S05) and lower at the other five. The highest copper measured by the program was at Station S01. Lead (Figure 13) was higher at all stations in 1987. Soil cadmium, chromium, nickel, and zinc (Figures 14-17) were within the range of concentrations previously recorded. Soil mercury (Figure 18) was lower than ever recorded at several stations.
Ve etation Chemistr Results The results of the tectorum are 1f,shown 1987 d I1 in Figures 19
- <<i through 24.
i ~b vegetation chemical analyses are presented in Table 2.
i With a few exceptions, vegetation copper concentrations were similar to f
elevated slightly at Station G01 and lower than previous years at Stations G02, S01, S02, and S03. Extractable sulfate concentrations in all species were within the ranges of measurements for previous years. Extractable chloride concentrations, with a few exceptions, were also within the range of concentrations measured in previous years. Chloride in Poa sandber ii (Figure
- 23) was the highest ever recorded at Stations G03, S04, and SOS. In Bromus tectorum (Figure 24) chioride was the highest ever measured at Station G03 but was within the range of previous measurements for this species at all other stations.
Soil and Ve etation Stud Summar Although some stations show departure from means of historical data for some chemical constituents, no trends or adverse impacts are apparent.
NONROUTINE REPORTS During 1987 there were no nonroutine reports required by Section 5.4.2 of the EPP nor were there any EPP noncompliances.
NPDES PERMIT-RELATED REPORTS Monthly discharge monitoring reports are submitted to the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC). A summary of the reported data is shown in Table 3. There were no instances of noncompliance in 1987.
~0 ~0 TABLE 1 SOIL CHEMISTRY AT NINE SAMPLE LOCATIONS, MAY 1987 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 pH (1:2 soil-water) 6.84 6.81 6.86 6.61 6.55 6.91 6.69 6.41 6.80 Conductivity (1:2 soil-water,. 52.3 42.2. 50.6 24.8 46.0 36.5 42.2 29.6 55.5 microsiemens/cm Sulfate ug/gm 2.82 3.72 0.64 1.28 2.64 0.90 2.18 2.18 3.34 Chloride ug/gm 13.60 11.68 13.28 16.64 7.92 7.04 6.64 14.64 9.52 Copper, ug/gm 13.24 12.70 11.58 10.41 .
17,34 13.67 14.98 13.11 11.97 Lead ug/gm 7.39 7.45 4.23 3.89 4.79 3.54 5.20 4.31 5.35 Cadmium ug/gm 0.08 0.08 . 0.05 . 0.13 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.05 0.08 Chromium ug/gm- 9.36 8.00- 6.39 5.07 6.17 6.87 6.55 7.46 8.37 Nickel ug/gm 17.22 14.22 11.63 11.42 16.56 12.45 13.44 13.73 11.63 Zinc ug/gm 50.25 50.55 43.39 43.07 51.04 31.44 60.57 44.42 47.02 Sodium X 0.092 0.096 0.068 0.054 0.065 0.046 0.084 0.061 0.080 Potassium X 0.269 0.216 0.152 0.134 0.172 0.096 0.169 0.173 0.164 Calcium X 0.08 0.40 0.34 .
0.35 0.35 0.42 0.41 0.33 0.43 Hercury ug/gm 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.006 0.004 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.002 Fluoride ug/gm 281.0 194.0 218.0 189.0 216.0 219.0 278.0 199.0 245.0 Bicarbonate 0.0019 0.0018 0.0015 0.0010 0.0015 0.0019 0.0018 0.0010 0.0025 (meq/HC03/gm)
Magnesium X 0.48 0.45 0.37 0.35 0.41 0.33 0.41 0.40 0;39
TABLE 2 VEGETATION CHEMISTRY AT NINE SAMPLE LOCATIONS, NAY. 1987 Site POSA* 8RTE* S IAL* PHLO* PUTR* ARTR*
Copper (ug/gm) G01 5.40 6.85 4.90 4.75 G02 2.55 4.70 6.10 2.80 G03 4.65 6.60 3.45 6.40 G04 3.60 5.20 4.50 5.05 S01 2.10 5.35 6.05 3.95 S02 1.75 4.0 3.60 4.00 S03 2.45 4.75 3.95 10.00 S04 2.80 5.10 5.15 6.20 S05 3.85 6.30 5.35 9.20 Extractable G01 0.023 0.028 0.162 0.025 Sulfate (5) G02 0.026 0.023 0.148 0.026 G03 0.023 0.093 0.532 0.021 G04 0.023 0.023 0.231 0.023 S01 0.023 0.026 0.198 0.023 S02 0.024 0.022 0.025 0.013 S03 0.021 0.023 0.023 0.025 S04 0.027 0.025 0.267 0.023 S05 0.028 0.023 0.015 0.023 Extractable G01 0.27 0.23 0.28 0.09 Chloride (X) G02 0.15 0.18 0.41 0.07 G03 0.35 0.39 0.56 0.09 G04 0.17 0.07 0.38 0.10 S01 0.14 0.15 0.67 0.09 S02 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.04 S03 0.17 0.10 0.06 WW 0.61 S04 0.26 0.13 1.13 0.08 S05 0.27 0.15 0.07 0.48
- POSA = Poa sandbergii BRTE = Bromus tectorum SIAL = ~Sis brium altissium
= Phlox ~lan ifolia 'HLO PUTR = Porehia tridentata ARTR = Artemisia tridentata
TABLE 3
SUMMARY
OF DISCHARGE MONITORING REPORTS, 1987 Low Volume Waste Cooling Tower Blowdown WA TSS (lbs/d) 0/G (lbs/d) Vol (103 gal/d) TRC (mg/1) Vol (106 gal/d)
Month Ave Max Ave Hax Ave Hax Hax Ave Hax Jan 1.2 8.8 0.1 0.3 12.4 31.2 c 0.1 0.9 1.5 Feb 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.7 12.4 20.9 < 0.1 0.6 1.5 Har 2.1 15.4 0.1 0.1 15.4 26.8 < 0.1 0.8 1.4 Apr 0.6 3.1 0.2 0.6 10.6 17.1 < 0.1 1.6 5.8 Hay 4.3 20.6 0.3 1.6 10.7 15.4 0.0 0.0 Jun 4.2 18.5 0.1 0.1 11.5 17.5 < O.l 1.7 3.2 Jul 1.3 5.8 0.1 0.1 12.8 28.5 < 0.1 4.0 Aug 0.6 1.9 0.5 5.1 15.3 29.6 < 0.1 2.1 7.6 Sep 4.4 28.6 0.1 0.2 13.7 28.2 < 0.1 1.4 5.9 Oct 2.4 26.4 0.1 0.1 11.6 14.5 < 0.1 1.4 2.3 Nov 0.6 1.6 0.1 0.5 13.2 28.8 <0.1 1.4 2.1 Dec 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.2 11.3 20.4 < 0.1 2.2 Permit Limt 34 2.5 20 40 0.1 4.6 9.4
OO lo b
310 311 3ll 312 g0 %CI I <<0 0 In<<0
-i QCLLS clir
~ I I% IAL LO IOLI>>
~ ~ %%%%%%%%%
gi CCLIAOKAlO ~ CIICIO <<0
~ 10 ~ II<<a %a%oooo%a 00<<IC IIL
' LI 44
% III 1%
p" f ~ 0 0 S 00% 0OO Iro 0<<Inc 0 Io O)c OC 1';-
l<<OCA iO C<<OCAI
~ ICC . ~<<~W 310
~ I /r 8 SI 0 tabac<<cc ooo ~+
L 8
L
~ I
<<Oco
~%%10 M~
-'. Otll 0 0 <<4 00 0C
-pi ~
) lOS i Ill% IKA Se LLOOO% X%PS C) 7P ~
~ CI DOS~ $ -oj<<%
r; r/
~+ 8 W)C ~
IICAl << on<<i%I <>Wl al <<%%>>
~
i~) ~ IVO OI III re ~ <<I ta %1 IA i
~ Ir<<l I'II a ~
I %%%
SCLO i'h $ 0 I<<<<a>>
//
~
) I V'%%
04 n
CD :~
r rl ). f~
//
I <<OV 0 CCO 0 I Po 0 0 el<<C<<OOOO%
0 O '\
cr<<
cl<<no 0
C/l a%Sea%a it'o %%%%% %%%%
llooro<<c iI
~ aa~
~ IOUI<<<<I OA OCC l OA
~ <<MCC<< to<<colo.
I'%%%8 '8 %%%
~ <<Ce <<0
%%% ae 0%<<orcoo400
~ I<<l0
\
0
~~
OM' tOOOLMC MllelorLMC Q Crtrcr lrlIle ILCC<<
%% C %%%%
Or
/
A <<o<<CC<< ~
caw%nil ~
COCL ~ I O<< "i EMERGENCY i; I p
<<OW fi PLAN ZONE MAP 4 I
~llc<<oo ir f 40 L'
0 lo 10 MiltRAOIU8
~~i'.
o e e %% f 1 M LIO<< <<I%IIII<<I%%% I<< I ~
SL SUPP l Y SYSTEM 342 343 343 3)C Or. 1 %%or %% 82 l8<<o l
9.0 LEGEND 1 980 8.5 1 981 1 982 8.0 1983 1984 1 985 7.5 1986 1987 7.0 6.5 6.0 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SlTE FIGURE. P,. SOIL pH, 1980-1987
1 100 LEGEND 1980 1981 80 1 983 70 O 984 60 1 985 c~
om 50 1986 Cl C/l XO D 1987 o fL o
30 20 10 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE
,"IGURE 3. SOIL CONDUCTIVITY, 1980, 1981, and 1983-1987
~y ~y f'
200 LEGEND 180 1980 1981 160 EZ 1 992 140 1983 g 120 1985 I M 1986 gg 100 CI1 O 1987 CD 80 60 40 20 0
G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 4. SOIL SULFATE, 1980-1987
.80 LEGEND
.72 1980 1981
.64 EZi 1982
.56 1983 V
.48 O 1984 CD QJ
~ .4O 1985 CD 1986
.32 2 1987
.24
.16
.08 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 5. SOIL CALCIUM (Wt 5), 1980-1987
Oy
.80 LEGEND
.72 1981 1982
.84 1 983
.58 1984
~Z 48 1985
~ Lxl C3 Q-CA le 1986
.~0 I
1987 32
.18
.08 0
GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 'O2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SITE FIGURE 6. SOIL MAGNESIUM (Ht X), 1980-1987
~y ~y
.20 LEGEND
~ 18 1980 1981
.16 1982 1983 UJ 1984
~
D 4J CD Q
1985
.10 D
Cl) w CD 1986 LxJ
.08 1987
.06
.04
.02 0
GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SITE FIGURE 7. SOIL SOOIUtl (Ht ~), 1980-1987
10 S
.50 1
LEGEND
.+5 1 980 1981
.40 1982
.35 1983 Lal
.30 D 984 cn ~ 1985
.25 II X
O Q CD UJ 1986
.20 1987
.15
.10
.05 0
G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE
.=IGURi 8. SOIL POTASSIUM (Wt X), 1980-1987
~y 40 LEG c.ND 1980 1981 30 FZ 1992 I"
CD D DI 20 1 983 1984 1985 X 1986 CX tel 1987 10 0
GO 1 GO2 GOD GO4 'SO1 SO2 SOD SO4 SO5 SITE FIGURE 9, SOIL BICARBONATE 1980 1987
1y
+00 LEGEND 1 980 350 1981 300 EZ 1982 1983 200 g 1 984 hl~.
CD 9 cn 200 1 985 F0 g
~o 1986 CD 150 1987 100 50 0
G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE F I GUR 10. SOIL FLUORI Di, 1980-1987
20 LEG" ND 18 1 980 1981 16 1982 1 983 I 12 1984 II
~
~
C3 D
O 10 1 985 1986 8
1 987 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE ll. SOIL CHLORIDE, 1980-1987
18.0 'GENO 1980 1 6.5 1981
'1 5.0 FZ 'I 982 1983 1 3.5 1984 CA 1 985
~
O g~ 120 VO 1986 1 0.5 1 987 9.0 7.5 6.0 GO1 GO2 GOD GO4 SO1 SO2 SOS SO4 SOS SITE FIGURE 12. SOIL COPPER, 1980-1987
Oy LEGEND 1980 1981 1 982 1 983 D 1984
- 1985 1986 1987 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 13. SOIL LEAD, 1980-1987
0~ Oy H
n I
.80 LEG" ND
.72 1980 1981
.64 EZi 'I 982
.56 1983 g
Ch
.4S D 1984 1985 zg .40 Ss 1986
.32 1987
.24
.16
.08 0
G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 14. SDIL CADIIIUI'I, 1980-1987
22.0 LEG:"ND 1 9.8 1980 1981 1 7.6 1 982
'1 5.4 1 983 I
CD 12.2 1 984 1 1.0 1 985 O
~o O 1986 8.8 1987 6.6 2.2 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE r IGURE 15. SOIL CHROMIUM, 1980-1987
0~
26.0 LEGEND 1980 1981 20.8 1 982 1 8.2 1 983 g 'I 5.6 1 984 I 13.0 1 985 1986 E3 1 98.
V.8 5.2 2.6 0
G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 SOS SITE FIGURE 16. SOIL NICKEL, 1980-1987
0~ S 90 LEGEND 1980 1981 70 PZ 1 982 1983 1984 1985 Mg R 50 1986 CD E
-==-*- 1 987 DO 20 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE r"IGURc. 17. SOIL ZINC, 1980-1987
J 4
.01000 LEGEND
.00899 1983 1984
.00798 1 985
.00697 1986 1987
>- 8 .00596
~ CD .00494
.00393
.00292
.00191
.00090 GOl GO2 GOD GO4 SO1 SO2 SOB SO4 SOS SITE FIGURE 18. SOIL HERCURY, 1983-1987
y ~
1 N
10 1
LEGEND 1 980 1 981 1 982 1 983 UJ Q
D
~
g
~
cn D 984 1985 pg C ~
s g~ D5 4 1986 1 987 0
G01 G02 -G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE FIGURE 19. COPPER IN POA SANDBERGII, 1980-1987
t (L
~ >
20 LEGEND 18 1 980 1981 1 982 1 983 pg iz 1984 Q
D ~
CD Cn 985 gg l0 1 1986 CD CD g-H 198T 0
GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SITE
- IGUR-" 20. COPP"-R'H BROIIUS TiCTORUI1, 1980-1987
Oy r~
'i t) i)i
'ql g/
.20 LEGEND
.18 1980 1981
.16 1982 1983 E
1984 1985
.10 1986 C3
.08 1987
.06
.04
.02 0
GO1 GO2 GO3 GO4 SO 1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SITE FIGURE 21. SULFATE IN POA SANDBERGI I, 1980-1987
+e ~y Q
ll
>>'r, l)l
<i' li."
P la I
.350 LEGEND
.315 1980 1981
.280 1 982
.245 1 983
.210 1 984 C
.1 75 1 985 8 1986 CD
.1 40 1987
.105
.070
.035 GO1 -
GO2 GO3 GO4 SO1 SO2 SO3 SO4 SO5 SITE FIGURE 22. SULFATE IN BROI<US TECTORUII, 1980-1987
~ ~
.50 1 'EGEND
.45 1980 1981
.40 1982
.35
~Ã 1 983 o
.50 D 984
.25 1 985 8 1986
.20 1987
.15
~ 10
.05 G01 G02 G03 G04 S01 S02 S03 S04 S05 SITE
=FIGURE 23. CHLORIDE IH POA SAti'DBERGII, 1980-1987
~y i n t]
f %
I t 4I U
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Box 968 ~ 3000 George Washington Way ~ Richland, Washington 99352 Docket No. 50-397 G02-88-097 April 28,1988 Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
Dear Sirs:
Subject:
NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT
Reference:
Facility Operating License NPF-21 Appendix B - Environmental Protection Plan Per Section 5.4. 1 of the referenced EPP, please find attached the subject report for the 1987 calendar year.
Very truly yours, G. C. S rensen, Manager Regulatory Programs
Attachment:
as stated cc: JB Martin/NRC RV C Bosted/Resident Inspector/901A WL Fitch/EFSEC