|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARNMP1L3469, Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits2022-06-30030 June 2022 Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits RS-22-082, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 112022-06-22022 June 2022 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 11 ML22047A1322022-02-15015 February 2022 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2021 Refueling Outage Activities RS-21-086, Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E2021-08-23023 August 2021 Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E RS-21-001, Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping2021-01-0404 January 2021 Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping ML20300A2352020-11-17017 November 2020 Documentation of the Completion of Required Actions Taken in Response to the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident ML20303A1752020-10-23023 October 2020 Proposed Relief Request from Section XI Repair/Replacement Documentation for Bolting Replacement of Pressure Retaining Bolting RS-20-070, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 102020-06-22022 June 2020 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 10 RS-19-093, Secondary Containment Drawdown Analysis2019-10-17017 October 2019 Secondary Containment Drawdown Analysis ML18138A3852019-03-0606 March 2019 Staff Assessment of Flood Hazard Integrated Assessment (CAC Nos. MG0221 and MG0222; EPID L-2017-JLD-0050) SVPLTR 19-0005, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2018 Refueling Outage Activities2019-02-0808 February 2019 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2018 Refueling Outage Activities RS-18-077, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 92018-06-20020 June 2018 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 9 ML18082A0812018-03-13013 March 2018 Request to Extend Enforcement Discretion Provided in Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 15-002 for Tornado-Generated Missile Protection Non-conformances Identified in Response to Regulatory Issues Summary 2015-06, Tornado Missile... RS-18-003, Report of Full Compliance with Phase 1 and Phase 2 of June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions2018-01-12012 January 2018 Report of Full Compliance with Phase 1 and Phase 2 of June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions ML18052A4862017-02-12012 February 2017 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal; Fifth 10-Year Interval 2017 Refueling Outage Activities ML16291A0212016-11-0808 November 2016 Staff Review of Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Associated with Reevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementing Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 RS-16-124, Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2016-08-31031 August 2016 Spent Fuel Pool Evaluation Supplemental Report, Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident ML16190A1162016-07-0606 July 2016 2015 Regulatory Commitment Change Summary Report RS-16-100, Mitigating Strategies Flood Hazard Assessment (Msfha) Submittal2016-06-30030 June 2016 Mitigating Strategies Flood Hazard Assessment (Msfha) Submittal SVPLTR 16-0017, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report Instrumentation2016-04-0808 April 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report Instrumentation ML15307A0562015-11-0404 November 2015 Supplement to Staff Assessment of Response to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Information Request - Flood Causing Mechanisms Reevaluation RS-15-265, Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors2015-10-23023 October 2015 Annual Report of Emergency Core Cooling System Evaluation Model Changes and Errors ML15251A3842015-08-31031 August 2015 Attachment 9 - NP-3305NP, Revision 1, Mechanical Design Report for Quad Cities and Dresden Atrium 10XN Fuel Assemblies - Licensing Report. (Non-Proprietary) ML15215A3372015-07-30030 July 2015 Holtec International Report No. HI-2146153, Revision 2, Licensing Report for the Criticality Analysis of the Dresden Unit 2 and 3 SEP for Atrium 10XM Fuel Design ML15097A5192015-04-27027 April 2015 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Relating to Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-Ichi ML15007A4912015-02-11011 February 2015 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-13-109 (Severe Accident Capable Hardened Vents) SVPLTR 15-0014, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2014 Refueling Outage Activities2015-02-11011 February 2015 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2014 Refueling Outage Activities RS-14-310, License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodology and Proposed Change to Technical Specification 4.3.1, Criticality2014-12-30030 December 2014 License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodology and Proposed Change to Technical Specification 4.3.1, Criticality RS-14-277, Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 12014-09-24024 September 2014 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 1 RS-14-208, Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049)2014-08-28028 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report in Response to March 12, 2012 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events (Order Number EA-12-049) ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 ML14115A2692014-05-30030 May 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident RS-14-122, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report - Redacted2014-05-19019 May 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Fukushima Lessons Learned - Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Report - Redacted ML14153A0062014-04-29029 April 2014 Revision 4 to Local Intense Precipitation Evaluation Report RS-14-067, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of The..2014-03-31031 March 2014 Seismic Hazard and Screening Report (Central and Eastern United States (CEUS Sites), Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Re Recommendation 2.1 of The.. SVPLTR 14-0013, Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2013 Refueling Outage Activities2014-02-28028 February 2014 Owner'S Activity Report Submittal Fifth 10-Year Interval 2013 Refueling Outage Activities RS-13-288, Request for License Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5. Core Operating Limits Report.2013-12-19019 December 2013 Request for License Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5. Core Operating Limits Report. ML13220A2382013-11-22022 November 2013 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 - Mitigation Strategies ML13317A8292013-11-20020 November 2013 Mega-Tech Services, LLC Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3, TAC Nos.: MF1046 and MF1047 ML13126A1792013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 1 of 13 ML13126A1802013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 13 of 13 ML13126A1812013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 2 of 13 ML13126A1832013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 3 of 13 ML13126A1842013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 4 of 13 ML13126A1852013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 5 of 13 ML13126A1862013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 6 of 13 ML13126A1872013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 7 of 13 ML13126A1882013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 8 of 13 ML13126A1892013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 9 of 13 ML13126A1902013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 10 of 13 2022-06-30
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARNMP1L3469, Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits2022-06-30030 June 2022 Constellation Energy Company, LLC, Request for Use of Honeywell Mururoa V4F1 R Supplied Air Suits RS-22-082, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 112022-06-22022 June 2022 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 11 RS-21-086, Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E2021-08-23023 August 2021 Supplement to Request for Exemptions from Portions of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix E RS-21-001, Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping2021-01-0404 January 2021 Revised Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Cases N-878 and N-880 for Carbon Steel Piping ML20300A2352020-11-17017 November 2020 Documentation of the Completion of Required Actions Taken in Response to the Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Dai Ichi Accident RS-20-070, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 102020-06-22022 June 2020 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 10 RS-19-093, Secondary Containment Drawdown Analysis2019-10-17017 October 2019 Secondary Containment Drawdown Analysis RS-18-077, Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 92018-06-20020 June 2018 Defueled Safety Analysis Report Update, Revision 9 RS-18-003, Report of Full Compliance with Phase 1 and Phase 2 of June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions2018-01-12012 January 2018 Report of Full Compliance with Phase 1 and Phase 2 of June 6, 2013 Commission Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Reliable Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions ML15251A3842015-08-31031 August 2015 Attachment 9 - NP-3305NP, Revision 1, Mechanical Design Report for Quad Cities and Dresden Atrium 10XN Fuel Assemblies - Licensing Report. (Non-Proprietary) ML15215A3372015-07-30030 July 2015 Holtec International Report No. HI-2146153, Revision 2, Licensing Report for the Criticality Analysis of the Dresden Unit 2 and 3 SEP for Atrium 10XM Fuel Design RS-14-310, License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodology and Proposed Change to Technical Specification 4.3.1, Criticality2014-12-30030 December 2014 License Amendment Request Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Methodology and Proposed Change to Technical Specification 4.3.1, Criticality RS-14-277, Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 12014-09-24024 September 2014 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 1 ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 ML14115A2692014-05-30030 May 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident RS-13-288, Request for License Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5. Core Operating Limits Report.2013-12-19019 December 2013 Request for License Amendment to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.5. Core Operating Limits Report. ML13220A2382013-11-22022 November 2013 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 - Mitigation Strategies ML13317A8292013-11-20020 November 2013 Mega-Tech Services, LLC Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Dresden Nuclear Power Station Units 2 and 3, TAC Nos.: MF1046 and MF1047 ML13126A1852013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 5 of 13 ML13126A1842013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 4 of 13 ML13126A1832013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 3 of 13 ML13126A1812013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 2 of 13 ML13126A1862013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 6 of 13 ML13126A1802013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 13 of 13 ML13126A1792013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 1 of 13 ML13126A1882013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 8 of 13 ML13126A1872013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 7 of 13 ML13126A1902013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 10 of 13 ML13126A1892013-03-28028 March 2013 Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Updated Transmittal #1 (Annex a) for Dresden, Unit 3, Report No. RS-13-06, Part 9 of 13 ML12306A3932012-11-0101 November 2012 Request for a Written Response to NRC Observations and Concerns Regarding Dresden Station Response Plan for External Flooding Events RS-09-165, Request for Approval of Updated Pipe Flaw Evaluation Report2009-12-0707 December 2009 Request for Approval of Updated Pipe Flaw Evaluation Report ML0908404302009-03-0505 March 2009 Medical Services (MS-1) Drill Report ML0821900132008-08-0707 August 2008 Monthly Operating Reports Second Quarter 2008 RS-07-097, Request for Technical Specifications Change for Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit2007-07-10010 July 2007 Request for Technical Specifications Change for Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limit ML0715705102007-04-0505 April 2007 CC-AA-309-1001, Rev 3, Attachment 1, Design Analysis Major Revision Cover Sheet, 9389-46-19-3, Rev 004, Diesel Generator 2/3 Loading Under Design Bases Accident Condition. ML0715705012007-04-0505 April 2007 CC-AA-309-1001, Rev 3, Attachment 1, Design Analysis Major Revision Cover Sheet, 9389-46-19-1, Rev 003 Diesel Generator 3 Loading Under Design Bases Accident Condition ML0715705052007-04-0404 April 2007 CC-AA-309-1001, Rev 1, Attachment 1, Design Analysis Major Revision Cover Sheet, 989-46-19-2, Rev 003, Calculation for Diesel Generator 2 Loading Under Design Bases Accident Condition ML0634601312006-12-0707 December 2006 Attachment 11, Exelon/Amergen Response to the Request for Additional Information, EP-EAL-0611, Criteria for Choosing Containment Radiation Monitor Reading Indicative Loss of the RCS Barrier ML0621300322006-05-31031 May 2006 GE-NE-0000-0053-8435-R1-NP, Rev 1, Dresden 2 & 3 and Quad Cities 1 & 2, Safety Valve Setpoint Tolerance Relaxation, May 2006 ML0606203682006-01-26026 January 2006 Attachment 3 (Technical Specifications) and 4 (Affidavit and Non-Proprietary Version of Attachment 2 to Exelon Letter Dated January 26, 2006) ML1024201462005-12-0707 December 2005 Groundwater Tritium Investigation Report, Dresden Generating Station, Project Number EXENW-18513-400 RS-05-064, Commitments and Plans Related to Extended Power Uprate Operation2005-05-13013 May 2005 Commitments and Plans Related to Extended Power Uprate Operation ML0514400842005-05-0505 May 2005 Enclosure 1, Attachment 2, 26A6266AB, Revision 4, Steam Dryer, GE Nuclear Energy, Design Specification Data Sheet, Dated May 5, 2005 ML0513601002005-04-30030 April 2005 Enclosure 2, Attachment 2, Replacement Steam Dryer Reactor Vessel Bracket Stress Report for Quad Cities 1, 2, and Dresden 2,3, GE-NE-0000-0034-4803-02, Non-Proprietary, Dated April 2005 ML0513300532005-04-25025 April 2005 Enclosure 3, Dresden Strain Gage Uncertainty Evaluation, SIA File No.: EXLN-17Q-301, Revision 0, Dated April 25,2005 ML0514400812005-04-24024 April 2005 Enclosure 1, Attachment 1, 26A6266, Rev 3, Steam Dryer, GE Nuclear Energy, Design Specification, April 24, 2005 RS-05-042, Additional Information Related to Analysis and Design of New Quad Cities Steam Dryers, and Responses to Requests for Additional Information Related to EPU Operation at Dresden and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Stations2005-04-0606 April 2005 Additional Information Related to Analysis and Design of New Quad Cities Steam Dryers, and Responses to Requests for Additional Information Related to EPU Operation at Dresden and Quad Cities Nuclear Power Stations ML0507303262005-03-31031 March 2005 Non-Proprietary Dresden and Quad Cities Neutron Flux Evaluation ML0510902702005-01-31031 January 2005 Attachment 2, CDI Report No. 05-01, Rev 0, Revised Hydrodynamic Loads on Quad Cities Unit 2 Steam Dryer to 200 Hz, with Comparison to Dresden Units 2 & 3 Loads. RS-05-005, Letter RS-05-005, Dated 1/05/05, Submittal of Information Regarding Extended Power Uprate Vulnerability Reviews2005-01-0505 January 2005 Letter RS-05-005, Dated 1/05/05, Submittal of Information Regarding Extended Power Uprate Vulnerability Reviews 2022-06-30
[Table view] |
Text
~
'<' ' , , I r DRESDEN 3 NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT CONTROL ROD BLADE INSPECTION AND EVALUATION April 1974
._l'O REGULATORY CENTRAL FILES
~ * .. ' ~ .. * \ . _:.' I '* .........~ 11. t \
- 1.
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS This report describes the eddy current examination conducted to Identify inverted B4 C tubes ifl the Dresden 3 control rod blades. Evaluation of the effect on safety margins by the inverted absorber tubes remaining in ~e reactor is also given.
Seven control roo blades were rejectable under the acceptance criteria established. These bli;ides were replaced during the April 1974 refueling outage. The remainder of the inverted absorber tubes (a2 in number) have negligible effect on safety margins even if maximum slumping of s.c is assumed.
1-1 /1-2
- 2. INTRODUCTION During July 1973 a manufacluringC!eviation (inverted B4 C tubes) in the control rod blades became known. This was
. reported as an abnormal occurrence to the USAEC, initially by the Millstone Point Company. A description of the inversions, the predicted population of the inversions, and evaluation of effects.on safety margin were first introduced on the Millstone docket (Reference 1) and later on a generic basis (Reference 2) .
.At the Dresden 3 site, an eddy current examination was used to detect inverted absorber tubes. During April .1974 of the refueling plant outage all control rod blades were successfully examined.
The purpose of this report is to: (1) report the results of the examination and (2) evaluate the effects on safety margins by control rod blades with an acceptable number of. inverted absorber tubes left in the core.
2*1/2-2
- 3.
SUMMARY
OF EXAMINAT,ON
. D_uring the period of Apri! 4, 1~74 through April 10, 1974, an edgy Gurrent examination.was performed on 177 control .
rod blades located in the Dresden 3 reactor pressure vessel. The objective was to locate the steel wool inserted in the bottom end of the absorber tube prior to installation of the end plug. The detection of the steel wool is an indication that the absorber*
tube had been installed in the blade in an upside down position. This examination was conducted by personnel certified in eddy current techniques in accordance with the reeommended practices of the American Society for Nondestructive Testing.
Specifics of the equipment and the detailed procedures are contained in Refe.rence 3.
Preparatory to the examination, two fuel bundles diagonally opposite each other in a cell were removed from the core so that the tops of the control blades were accessible for examination. The probe of a precalibrated eddy current tester was lowered into the reactor vessel onto one of the wings of a blade. During the scanning, any change in the conductive or magnetic properties of the wing results in change in the internal "eddy currenf' induced in it by the coil, and these changes in tum affect the impedance of the coil. This impedance variation is electronically processed and displayed on an oscilloscope or strip chart. A trained inspector then compares this trace with a trace developed from known conditions in a control rod blade standard.
As each control rod blade was examined, results were recorded on data sheets identifying the core position and the wing in the control rod blade.
3-1 /3-2
l
- 4. RESULTS AND EVALUATION 4.1 RESULTS n
At conclusion of the examination, it was determined that of the 1 blades examined, 187 absorber tubes in 25 control rod blades were inverted. One 'wing was completely inverted in four blades> The summary shown in Table 1 identifies the inverted absorber tubes by core position, control rod blade number, and location in each wirig of the blade ..
Table 1 I;. r.; !* ."!. r DRESDEN 13'C'C)NTROl.'.l ROD" BlADE 'EXAMINATION Total.
.,. .. <Inverted * **
B4 C Tubes Blade Core* Wlng'"and Location of Inverted B4 C Tubes
- per CRD Item Serial No. Position A B c D* 'Blade* - :
1 DD-1n 02-35 16,17 ..
- ** 1 '2 ..
2 CY-87R 06-35 6 . r .,
3 DD-19 10-35 15, 18, 19 3 4 DD-122 10-47 13,16 2*
5 DD-121 10-51 6 1 6 DD-9 14-39 14,15,16, 13, 14, 15, 16, 4,5,8,9, 14,15, 16, 34 17, 18, 19,20,21 17, 18, 19,20,21 10,11, 12, 13, 14 17, 18, 19,20;21 '
7 DD-49 14-47 3,4 2 8 DD-10 18-39 All *21 9 DD-64' 18"47 '5 1;
18-51 1 11 DD-117 26-27 6;7,8 *3 12 DD-40 26-43 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 - 7 13 . DD-94 26-51 '
20,21' *2 14 DD-17 30~39 . 8, 12, 13, 14! 4,5,6,7,8;9,' 4 22 . '*
15, 16, 17, 18 10, 1'1~12, 13, 14, 15, 16 '
15 DD-1 30-47 ' *: 4,5 2 16 DD-50 34-47 All 1,2,3,11~12 26 17 DD-111 34-55 - 4
. CY-163R i *.*
18 38-43 9 1 19 DD-155 38-51 18,19,20 All 24 20 DD-7. 42-55 - 3,4 - 2 21 DD-141 46-31 7,8,9,10 4 22 CY-153R 46-43 16 23 CY-149R 46-51 - 6' 24 . DD-125 54-23 14,15 2
,,) 25 DD-154 54-43 Air** - 21' Total 18:7 i1 4.2 EVALUATION . '
4.2.1 Acceptance Criteria An extensive critical experiment program was conducted at the KWU facility at Grosswelzheim, Germany, for the purpose of obtaining data for use in establishing acceptance criteria for inverted control rod blades (see Reference 2). Based 4-1
on these results the following acceptan~ critE1ria were:deriv~d. Any control rod blade is acceptable if it meets these requirements:
- 1. No wing should contain more than four inverted tubes.
2, Ea¢h inverted tube location is assigned a value for a change in control rod blade strength in accordance with
- Figure 1. The.sum of the values for eacti inverted tube in .a control rod blade (all four wings) must not exceed 4%. . ' .
The ba.sis for the above criteria is that the permitted deviation shall not cause a decrease in shutdown margin of more than approximately 0.0025 .:1kett. if the B4 C ii) tubes should settle the maximum amount of 16 inches in a particular area of the core.
4.2.2 .. Safety Analysis
- , Based on the above criteria, seven control rod blades. listed in Table 1 are rejectable. These.are blades in core
. positions*t4-39, 18-39, 26-43, 30-39, 3+:47, 38-51, and 54-43. All seven of these were replaced during the April 1974 refueling outage. From Table 1 it can be seen that a total of 187 absorber tubes are inverted. If the number of inverted absorber tubes in the seven replaced rods are subtracted, a net of 32 inverted absorber tubes remain in the rei;tctor. In terms of fraction of total B4 C tubes, this is:
32 0.0022 4x21x1n Shutdown Margin Based on the ex~mination of Dresden 3 control rods and replacement of seven of the rods, the effect of remaining inverted-B4 C tubes has been evaluated. The area most affected is control rod 14-51 which is adjaeent to five blades containing inverted tubes. Using Figures 1 and 2 of the Reference the resulting reduction in shutdown margin,would be less than 0.03% .:1k if the B4 C in these tubes should slump the f1laximum amount during the next cycle of operation.
Compliance Wit~ the technical specifications shUtdown rrlargin requirements can be CC>~firmed bydemonstrating at startup.that the reactor cari be shut down by R+0.25% ~K with the strongest rod withdrawn where R includes 0.03% .:1K for B4 C slumping. During th~ operatil"!g cycle the shutdoWJJ ~argin Win not decrease. In summary, the technical specifications shutdown margin requirement of 0.25% .:1K can be met with extra shutdown margin with maximum theoretical settling of B4 C assumed in the remaining few inverted absorber tubes.
Other Accidents and Transients Effect of the potential settling of B4 C in the remaining inverted absorber tubes was review0d for th~ rod drop accident and the pressurization transients.
In the case of the rod drop accident, it was concluded in Reference 1 that if all of the absorber tubes in all four wings were inverted in one control rod blade and if the B.C has settled the maximum of 16 inches, the worth in 'the adjacent blade would be increased by an estimated 0.002 .:1K. Since the maximum number inverted absorber tubes rem~ini~g in any given blade is four (position 46-31), or approximately 4% of total of 84, the effect on an adjacent rod is negligible.
i For the pressurization transient (turbine trip with bypass failure), it was shown in Reference 2 that if 5% of the absorber.
tubes were inverted and the B4 C slumped the maximum amount, a loss in pressure margin (difference between peak transient pressure and setting of the first safety valve) of aboUt one psi would result. With 0.22%of the absorber tubes in the core inverted, the loss in pressure margin is negligible .
... '; *.'.: ~.-~ . *' .
4-2
1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1.0 Q.9
~
- c 0.8 I-zw a: 0.7 I-II) w 0
~
ct
.J 0.6 w al LL
~ 0.5
.g 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0
2 3 4 5 6 .7 8 9 10 11 . 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 TIP POSITION OF EMPTY TUBE IN THE WING CENTER Figure 1. . Change in Control Blade Strength Per Empty Polson Tube
Q 0.28 0.26 BASIS FOR CONTROL ROD ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 4%
0.24 0.22 REDUCTION IN WORTH OF THE END OF THE CONTROL BLADE 0.20
'.i2
<1 0.18 3%
~
z C>
a: 0.16 c(
~
z
~ 0.14 0
0
~ :r 0.12
~
Cl) 0
!a 0
0.10
..J 0.08 0.0f; 0.04 0.02 0
2 4 8 10 20 40 100 200 1000 ':
NUMBER OF INVERTED BLADES ADJACENT TO.A STUCK ROD Figure 2. Loss of Shutdown Margin Versus Number oUnverted Blaqes with 12 ln.-15 in. B 4C Slump Placed Adjacent to a Stuck Control Rod-Equilibrium Core .With Ax/ally Distributed Gd
REFERENCES
- 1. "Reactor Control Blade Evaluation," July 23, 1973 (MNPS-1 Special Report).
- 2. J. A. Hinds (GE) letter to D. J. Skovholt (USAEC), dated October 8, 1973.
- 3. D. L Rlchard$0n andT. D. Smith, "Procedure for Locating Carbon Steel Heat Sinks in Control Rod Tubes During Plant Outages," November 1973 (NED()-20211).
L
- *i R-1/R-2
REGULATORY D OCKET FILE COP.Y RETUR~*T rro ::=::ULATORY CENTRAL FILES ROO~l .VJ..d
- . o* * * ***I \o * * < o' l o *
- I * - I ' * ' ' * * * * - * ' * 'l.o,