ML17226A121
Text
0 20 -
0 20 30 9
t
++-tt+-
- - - & - -
___-
I FIGURE TRANSPORTATION ROUTES WITH 1 N 80Km OF RIVER BEND STATION RIVER BEND N22.000 N20,OOO ' ,/' :.; " I j ',# t 9 N
_N22,00 OT E -
PLANT - N12.000 500 0 500 2000 noc FEET I.,. I I I
~
2.000 \ N20.000 lu , - 3r u) u) ,. I- , .: j? . __ N22,000 . N20.000 I N14,000 t I - 12,000 NOTES 1. VERTICAL MEAN SEA DATUM: LEVEL AS ESTABLISHED BY U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
- 2. DISTANCE FROM CENTERLINE REACTOR NO. 1 TO PROPERTY BOUND = 3035.1 5' 3. SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT DELETED. 4. WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDED. LOCATION El 7,600. N14.500 (LCN 01.02-009)
- 5. GENERATION SUPPORT BUILDING ADDED. LOCATION El 8,200, N17.400 (LCN 01.02-008)
I RESTRICTEDAREA BOUNDARY 2000 I I I RESTRICTED FOR RIVER BEND STATION UP-DATED ANALYSISREPORT ROADS
- - ILES I I I . ,
N LEGEND: 0 5 -
2.1-5 POPU 10 I
i
....................
........ .......................
......................
..............:.*
.................
Z.:.: :.:.:.:.:
0
......................
......................
.........
0 5 10 20 30 I I I 2.1-6 PARISHES, COUNTIES AND TOWNS I WITHIN 50 MILES UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
~~.~~~o
.......................
...'.... ....:.............;
................_
..........__ I I POPULATION SECTORS WITHIN 50 MILES UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-
0 0--0 0
0 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETYANALYSISREPORTINDUSTRIALFIRMSANDMAJORTRANSPORTATIONROUTESWITHIN 5 MILES 4 I 2 , SCALE-MILESI25,,I o , SCALE-kiLOMETERSFIGURE2.2-1 o ,INDUSTRIAlFIRMS HOLLOWAY GRAVEL CROWN ARMY CO.p., OF ENGINEERS-ST.
FRANCISVILLE CASTING ARD GREENMAN, TECHNOLOGIES OF LOUSISANNA BIG CAJUNNO.2 POWER PLANT*ENTERGY GULF STATES,INC.RIVERBENDSTAnON o BARGEFACIUTIESANDFERRY LANDINGSA-BIG NO.2 POWER PLANTB-NEW ROADSFERRY-(WEST FELICIANA PARISH)C-ST.FRANCISVILLE FERRY-(POINTE COUPEE PARISH)2.3.4.5.
FAA VICTORAIRWAY-V71 e*******!.....e....-.....-:t.....-----L-........-.-*-...-+--..---
ILLiNOiS CENTRM-Revision11 October 1998 ClGASWELLSI 1 4 I 2 , SCALE-MILES 2 I o , SCALE-KILOMETERS o , FIGURE 2.2-2 AA-CROWNVANTAGEBB-ENERGY CORPORATION STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WITHIN 5 MILESRIVERBENDSTATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTA-CAJUN RURALELECTRICPOWERCOOPERATIVEB-COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANYC-CROWN VANTAGED-RUSSELL DANIEL OIL COMPANYE-GUYD.DENHAM, GULF OIL DISTRIBUTORF-TRANSCONTINENTAL PIPELINE COMPANYG-LEAKE OIL COMPANYH-LEAKEGAS COMPANY..-ENTERGY GULF STATES,INC.RIVERBEND STATION LEGEND:*INDUSTRIAL FIRMS AND DISTRIBUTORS USINGORSTORING HAZARDOUS MATERIALSPIPELINE ID NUMBER 1,2.3-----TRANSCONTINENTAL PIPELINE COMPANY6,7 TEXASEASTERNTRANSMISSION CORPORATION 8,9, IO='*.-*,.COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY Revision 11 October 1998 TPC 20 TPC 2"MISSISSIPPI RIVER DETAIL I(nottosea le)TPC 23 DETAIL 3 (not to scale)I SOLATIONVALVESON PIPELINESINTHE VICINITY OF RIVERBENDSTATION RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE 2.2-20 TPC 3 COMPRESSOR STATION I GAS_______1 r-Ir----___________
- _TP_C_26_DETAIL 2 (not to sea te)2 , o , SCALE-MILES 024 , , , SCALE-KI LOMETERS I LUNO'S GULf
on G.C.
95 85 80 75 70 0.05 0.2 0.5 30 50 70 99 0.01 0.05 0.2 0.5 5 20 30 50 99.99 (OF) 2.3-3 85 8C 75 7c 65 6C 55 5c 35 3c 5 0.5 5 20 30 10 OF 2.3-4 7c 65 6C 55 50 0.05 0.2 0.5 2 5 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 98 99 99.5 99.9 99.9 99.99 2.3-5
0.01 0.05 0.5 5 30 50 60 70 80 90 99.8 I 80 2.3-7 20 30 2.3-8 I10 I05 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45 L I 0.01 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.5 2 5 99 99 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 95 98 99 99.5 99.8 99.9
2.3-10
95 90 05 80 75 70 60 55 50 (OF) 35 3c 25 5 2.3-12 I OF 90 85 8C 75 70 6C 55 50 35 30 25 20 5 0 0.5 70 99 2.3 0 A 4( 2 r E 3 I 0 4 n 0 2 &9 27 05 5 20 30 40'50 60 70 80 90
d d d 000000 0 000000 0 0000000 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ul 0 0 P 0 0 0 ul 0 0 cn 0 0 0 I 0 0 2: I b 4 0 *em ONP 0 000 000 00 000 000 000 0000 00000000 0 ul 0 0 0 0 0 ul 0 0 0 0 0 ul 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 \i 3 A Z A 0 -7 LL 2 2 z 3 0 w 0 0 a c I I c LL 2 2 z 3 0 cy 0 a c I 13 I 800 200 d c 111 A z 3 0 a 0 0 co c a I 0 800 200 0' I
800 600 200 0 500 0 i 2000 t UJ UJ 2 UJ A z 3 0 0 a I 0 I UJ t UI u1 u- a 2 z 3 0 OL 0 4 I I c 600 200 0' I000 I000 800 600 200 0 0
- c. 2 A z 3 0 a 0 a c I I 800 600 200 I 200 0 3500 5000 800 600 0' 600 200 c P z 3 0 0 0 4 I 0 I 2 c c LL P z 3 0 OL 0 0 4 2 a c I 0 I 600 200 800 600 200 Oi 0 500 20002500 3000 3500 SO00 7, 0 500 2000 2500 3000 3500 SO00 2.3-19 0 z 3 0 cy 0 a A a c- I I c a 2 a z 3 0 cy 0 U I 0 I t-800 d 0 d 500 c IJI IJI z 3 0 OL 0 0 a c I 0 I c d IJI z 3 0 OL 0 0 4 I 0 c I 200 0 0 500 2000 2.3-20
800 600 I/ 600 200 0 5000 d 4 Z 3 0 0 0 a c I 0 I I 200 0 0
I 2 n z 3 0 63 0 4 I I c-800 600 200 4 a 3 0 0 4 200 800 c I c II II 800 Z 3 0 ty 600 0 a 200 I 0 0 I Lu i 500 2000 25003000 3500 4000 5000 2 p 800 Z 3 600 0 I 0 A a c 200 01 2000 2500 4000 I 5%
2000 2.3-22
c P Z 3 0 Ly 0 0 I I A 4 c I 0 SO00 5000 c- u.
a UJ a 800 0 600 3 0 a I 13 I c c UJ UJ u, 2 u1 2 2 3 0 0 0 UJ a c- I I UJ 0 t- A z 3 0 1y 0 a c I I 0 3500 800 600 200 2000 800 600 200 0 I 2% A0 0 0' CI z 3 0 0 0 rn a c I 0 0 500 2000 25003000 200 0 500 2500 3000 c Ly P z 3 0 e 0 0 4 4 c I 0 I 800 600 3000 3500 5000 3500
a 4 z 3 0 0 0 a t I I c a 2 P z 3 0 PL 0 a t I 19 I -1 800 5000 800 600 d %f t a Z 3 0 0 0 a c I 0 I c P z 3 0 0 a 4 4 c- I I 200 200 0 f 20002500 5000 05% y),
2 2 800 3 0 0 a t I 0 I 600 200 0' 1.5%
800 600 200 0 2000 c P Z 3 0 OIL 0 0 a 4 4 c I r 4 2 3 0 OL t3 0 I a c. II I 200 Oi SO00 c- LL L3 z 3 0 OL 0 a a 2 c I I 800 600 200 d c 4 II 800 z 3 0 600 0 0 a I 0 7 LL 2 2 800 0 600 3 rpL a c 200 I 0 25003000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5000 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 c 4 a p 800 Z 3 600 0 I a 200 c I
t A
A Z 800 3 0 ry 0 600 U I 200 I 0' 0 5000 A A 800 0 0 600 3 4 t 0 0 I 500 2000 2500 3500 5000
- 2.
c 4 d 800 z I) 0 600 0 0 c I 20002500 A t U A A P z 3 0 0 0 U I t3 c I 5000 r u, 4 A n 2 3 0 0 0 a c I I t u, A A z 3 0 ry 0 4 I I c 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 800 600 200 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 25003000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2% I 2000 2500 3500 4000 4500 5000 I 600 400 200 0 500 1000 I500 20002500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 40004500 5000 c u, 2 n Z 3 0 13 0 a c I I 800 600 800 600 0' 2500 t 4 4 808 2 3 0 at 600 0 0 4 c 200 I 0 I rp t 4 Z 3 0 e 0 0 a r 0 c I I 2.3-31 2 n 800 3 0 0 0 a c I 0 I c u- A 2 z 3 0 w 0 0 I 0 I c .5% 0' .SO0 600 200 d c- z 3 0 0 0 a c I 0 I LL a A Z 3 0 0 0 IS c a I 0 I 800 600 200 P 2% .5% 0 800 600 c 4 n z 0 OL 6 a a I I 800 600 200 0 0
800 600 2% -5 600 200 'A 2500 2.3-33 c u, a a z 3 0 Ly 0 0 a c I I c A A c 2 2 z 3 0 Ly 0 a c I I 3 ry 0 0 0 a I: c I
a a 800 3 w 0 a I 200 0 I 0' c A a z 3 0 13 0 a c I 19 0 A P z 3 0 0 a OL c- I 0 I 800 Q 3000 3500 4500 5000 c A p 800 z 3 0 600 Ly 0 0 a c I 0 I Oi 5000
TREATMENT am (La 500 500 I500 2060 2500 I
cy -iG Us I 3 0.002% (3/17/77-5/31/77, 3/17/78
-5/31/78 3/1/79-3/16/79) 7.600, 4 so0 0 so0 ZOO0 2.3-37 I--.. .--a --..-.-a.
a ru a 3 OF -1 500 0 500 I500 2000 I 2.3-38
-^--II__..__
a ry 1 2
'a u) 0, 0, u) s N16,000 US I 3035 IS' a
ON 4 500 0 500 IS00 200 300 500
a 5 cu d 1- 3 500 0 500 2000 2506 W-JW A& /a U!&
0 0-a kJ a 4 U.S 2 3035 3
- 7.
500 0 500 i
US oo02% OF ON OF 500 2000 I I 0 9 N24.000 NOTES I SHOWN OF 500 ZOO0 I
0 9 ru 1
0 9 U 36.0-5 OP-TCO I 7- 0 IS00 0 2 0 3 50 0 5 20 0 20 30 50
225 200 175 150 125 -5 .5 3 .5 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 .S i5 3 3 .5 5 50 25
225 200 5 25 1 1-50 i 1 I I 1 23-50 I I A I I 8 8 8 I 8 1 2.3-51
2.3-52 1 c L I 2.3-53 1 i 1 .5 250 5 500 J 300 y 200 Iy 00 .6 5 4 Y c 500 300 200 0 .6 2.3-55 50
500 .6 5 0 U c Y 5 300 ii 200 0 .6 0
2.3-56 500 300 5 200 00 .6 U b 500 U 300 2 ii 200 c 0 .6 50 0
2.3-57 500 300 5 200 00 .6 4 c w 500 .6 2.3-58 E 3 2.3-59 N LEGEND: -
I - -
0 100 200 300 I RIVER BEND STATION 0 50 I00 ' ' " I SOURCE :
~
. .. 0 0. (D - 0 0- 0 ,
N20.000 , - rn -. 5 - I , (Y , I I. vwnuu LML GEOMTK: SURVEY DISTANCE FROM
= "REAlMWT UCN (ACRES)
I 3 5* 6* ? lo* l6* ZS+ .7 0.1 s 0.5 0.2 s 6.7 0. I 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.3 5 s J4.2
'
'
Ile 0 233 d'6 BAYOU I85 225 =
0 / 5 20 I I - I Castlev /- / OF FINISHGRAD INGAT STAT IONb*DRAINAGE D IRECTION=--------:: BERM 1000 I 500 I FEETLEGEND:---DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY o 100 200 I I II, METERSRIV ER B END S TA T ION UP DATED, SAFE TY A NALYS IS REPO RT EVISIONRE2.4-6 0 1.''.1
/
\ b...,., 2 0 I I 2 3 0 RIVER BEND STATION I
LAG TIME RELATIONSHIP RIVER BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT DETERMINATION OF 640 Cp RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
0 BEND REPORT H = hrs 3 2 c z FIGURE GRANTS BAYOU UNIT HYDROGRAPH RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
2 EAST FORK GRANTS BAYOU UNIT HYDROGRAPH RIVER BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- =
800 600 00 0 0 8 FIGURE 2.4-13 GRANTS BAYOU ABOVE CONFLUENCE WITH WEST CREEK UNIT HYDROGRAPH RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
= 1 I & = c FIGURE WEST CREEK UNIT HYDROGRAPH RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
5 PEAK PMF FLOW VS. DRAINAGE AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT \
NEW NOTE: DECREASE IN STREAM FLOW IS OCCASIONED BY CHANNEL AND BACKWATER STORAGE. MADRID FLOODWAY I- - 400,000 + ' 540,000--
0 v, 02 8 ARKANSAS CITY. 0, WEST ATCHAFALAY A WAX LAKE OUTLET PADUCAH MEMPHIS GREENVILLE
& ;V IC K B u R G I NATCHEZ RIVER BEND STATION RED RIVER LANDING BONNET I CARRE SPILLWAY I 1000 -+ GULF OF MEXICO SOURCE: FLOOD CONTROL IN THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER VALLEY. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, VICKSBURG, MI., 1973. FIGURE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER PROJECT DESIGN FLOOD (PDF) RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
, 5 i 0 2 -
0 I 3 I LEGEND: msl ~~~ - FIGURE MISSISSIPPI RIVER PDF OUTLINE IN SITE AREA RIVER BEND STATION I UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE MISSISSIPPI RIVER FLOODWAY SYSTEM IN SITE AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 4 20 0 5 10 A -
9 BACKWATER PROFILE METHOD RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT (THIS FIGURE HASBEENDELETED)
FIGURE 2.4-20 DETERMINATIONOFFLOW AT DROWNED WEIR RIVER BEND 8TATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT a - u) u) u) - - + ,/ ,y: . , +
CREEK SECTION
=
I
- u) er 75- i 0 a ). 4 \ \ \ I 0 I I I F 300 FIGURE SIMULATED WEIR FOR BRIDGE AT CROSS SECTION ON GRANTS BAYOU, SSE CONDITION RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 80-CII E-70-BRIDGE..-...Z--------0 f0-e(60->W....I w 50-1 I III III f0100 200300400500600 700 800 DISTANCE, ft NOTES: LOOKING DOWNSTREAM SEE SECTION LOCATION ON FIGURE 2.4-21 FIGURE 2.4-23 SIMULATEDWEIRFORBRIDGEAT.CROSSSECTION5ON GRANTS BAYOU, SSE CONDITIONRIVERBEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- cn c - c a > 4 -I I I I I 300 I CROSS SECTION 6 ON GRANTS BAYOU, RIVER BEND STATION PDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- i a 0 > c A I 300 SIMULATED WEIR FOR BRIDGE AT CROSS SECTION 7 ON GRANTS BAYOU, SSE CONDITION BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT c
FIGURE SIMULATED WEIR FOR BRIDGE AT CROSS SECTION W1 ON WEST CREEK, SSE CONDITION RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
I I I I I FtGURE SIMULATED WEIR FOR BRIDGE AT CROSS SECTION W2 ON WEST CREEK, SSE CONDITION I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
n=0.03 30' T 10'BOTTOM EL.AT W5 IS+80 r-50'CROSS SECTION BOTTOM ELEVATION (ft msl)W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 80 81 82 83 84 FIGURE 2.4-28 FABRIFORM CHANNEL CROSS SECTION RIVER BEND 8TATION UPDATEDSAFETYANALYSISREPORT PREVAILING WIND NOTE: 1. OPERATING WATER LEVELS: NORMAL - EL. 105 FT. MSL RANGE - EL. 103-106 FT. MSL 330 FT. ROUND MECHANICAL 200 FT. DIA. (TYP) (NOT TO SCALE) DRAFT COOLING T 0 (TYP) UNIT 1 PUMPWELL UNIT 1 TOP OF WALL EL. 108 FT. MSL GRADE TOWER 1A BASIN EL. 96 FT. MSL EL. 91 FT. MSL 0 200 HORIZONTAL SCALE - FEET VERTICAL - NOT TO SCALE EL. 85.5 FT. MSL FIGURE CIRCULATING WATER FLUME AND PUMPWELL BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 50 100 200 , I SCALE IN FEET TRUE NORTH INTAKE-DISCHARGE AREA EMBA YMENT DEVELOPMENT TO RIVER ACCESS ROAD--.RIVER BEND 8T A TIONUPDATEDSAFETYANALYSISREPORT FIGURE 2.4-30 PLANT NORTH MAKEUP PUMP HOUSE STRUCTURE////\RIVER WATERINTAKESCREENS V FIG.2.4-31 qOO EL(-)12'3'0'DIA.COOLING TOWER PIPE6"DIA.SLUDGE SLOWDOWN PIPE REMOVABLE COVER AIR SUPPLY & BIRD SCREEN ENTRANCE DOOR MAKEUP WATER PUMPHOUSE STRUCTURE
& EL. 54.5' PROJECT DESIGN FLOOD MOTOR CONTRO N.W.L.= NORMAL WATER LEVEL M.L.W. = MEAN LOW WATER E.L.W. EXTREME LOW WATER 36" DIA. MAKEUP WATER PIPE DISCHARGE TO CLARIFIERS VACUUM PRIM1 CONN ECTION BACKWASH CONNECTION
'I N.W.L. 20.4' WATER PUMP 36" DIA. MAKEUP WATER INTAKE SUCTION PIPES M.L.W. 7.0' & _(__ DIA. MAKEUP WATER PUMP DISCHARGE PIPE EL.
Q SUCTION PIPE FLOOR EL.
INTAKE PIPE SUPPORTS SCREENS 0 20 2 HORIZONTAL SCALE (FEET)
MAKEUP WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE PROFILE RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 'RGJ";'C; DESIGN FLOOD RIPRAP /--- CLASS IV FILL li - I / -----g$/ /7 SECTION 2-2 (SC ALE 1/4 "=l'-O' ' ) f-N.W.L. 20.4' I---- E.L.W. 1.0' 12'7sLEEvE\
HED GRADE EL. - 30" DIA. COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN PIPE PEA GRAVEL 14" DIA. SLUDGE BLOWDOWN PIPE RIPRAP FOR SLOPE & PIPE PROTECTION 30" DIA. COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN PIPE 14" DIA. SLUDGE BLOWDOWN PIPE / \ $ 30" DIA. COOLING TOWER BLOWDOWN PIPE EL. 36'" 30" DIA. COOLING TOWER BLOWDOW N, PIPE 12" DIA. STEEL SLEEVE 6" DIA. SLUDGE BLOWDOWN PIPE I - PIPE CENTRALIZER (TYP) SECTION 1-1 (SCALE %"=I1) 60 I 30 HORIZONTAL SCALE (FEET) 0 N.W.L -NORMAL WATER LEVEL M.L-W.-MEAN LOW WATER E.L.W.-EXTREME LOW WATER 2.4-32 DISCHARGE PIPELINES TO MISSISSIPPI RIVER RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 800 700 600 500 a z 0 A 300 c + 3 200 0 0 50 200 250 300 350 2.4-33 OUTFALL DILUTION CHARACTERISTICS RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-
0
=
SURFACE PLUME-MAXIMUM DELTA T RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-
0
~5862 =
= SURFACE PLUME-MAXIMUM AMBIENT RIVER TEMPERATURE RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-
= (
=
SURFACE PLUME-ANNUAL AVERAGE RIVER FLOW RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-600- - = -800- 9 a Z-looo- - - - - -
MsL- -
1 Ed ou - Uplands - Zone I, - Zone -Zone 3 SE vrA - Zone 3
[I MSL= --6 1 I I - =
8 I =
I I IIlSll -
3, r, - -600 z -800 0 > - a y r2 - -
r3 - /- -. :
& I 4 0 11111111111
- 5. -
IN RIVER BEND 240 n 220 > 2 200. \ 2 a 0 - 140 - 120. uJ 0 a $ 80. a 401 .o 0 3 LEGEND I EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH 0.0 POINTE COUPEE PARISH --- WEST FELICIANA PARISH HISTORIC VALUES PROJECTED VALUES 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 TIME
- (1) SNIDER, T.L. AND FORBES, PUMPAGE OF WATER IN LOUISIANA, 1960. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BATON ROUGE, LA., 1961. LOUISIANA, 1965. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BATON ROUGE, LA., 1966. (3) DIAL, D.C. PUMPAGE OF WATER IN LOUISIANA, 1970. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, BATON ROUGE, LA., WATER RESOURCES PAMPHLET NO. 26, 1970.
(4) CARDWELL, G.T. AND WALTER, W.H. PUMPAGE OF WATER IN LOUISIANA, 1975. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, BATON ROUGE, LA., OFFICE OF PUBLIC WORKS, WATER RESOURCES SPECIFICATION REPORT NO. 2, 1979. SUPPLY OF THE BATON ROUGE AREA. LOUISIANA WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE, BULLETIN 5, LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, BATON ROUGE, LA., FEBRUARY, 1970. NEWSLETTER, BATON ROUGE, LA., VOL. 5, NO. 5. COMPANY TO CASE, E.G., NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, MAY 31, 1978, RBG-5324.
(2) BIEBER, P.P. AND FORBES, M.J. PUMPAGE OF WATER IN (5) KAZMANN, R-G- THE PRESENT AND FUTURE GROUND-WATER (6) CAPITAL-AREA GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION COMMISSION (7) CORRESPONDENCE, HUMPHREYS, L.L., GULF STATES UTILITIES HISTORIC AND PROJECTED PUMPAGE RATES: EAST BATON ROUGE, COUPEE AND WEST FELICIANA PARISHES BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
0 AND USE 3 I - 0 2 2 -
20FT G
WATER WELLS WITHIN A TWO-MILE RADIUS OF THE SITE ~
UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
\ THE ISLAND WARD 7 lo, ."
- 2) 1 1
T9(UTl FEET 500 1000 1500 2000 2500IIIII Te(UT)T3(UT)\
T4(UT)T2(UT):00 0'00 200 300 400 500 1.1.1IIIII METERS LE": P4,820,T5-PIEZOMETERORoeS£RVATIONWELL NUMERo-ORoeSERVATIONWELL (UI)-EMPLACEDINUPLANDTERRACE AQUIFIER tzn-EMPLACEDINTERTIARYZONEI AQUIFIER(Z3)-EMPLACEDINTERTIARYZONE3AQUIFIER(MRAA)-EMPLACEDIN MISSISSIPPI RIVER ALLUVIAL AQUIFIER NOTE: I.TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INTERVAL:5FEET o501000'0 20 I 111 I IIIII fFEET METERS ENLARGEMENTOFPOWER PLANT AREA!lOO'0 If!I 1 I+NI2,OOOLOCATIONOFPIEZOMETERSANDOBSERVATIONWELLSINTHESITEAREARIVERBENDSTATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTFIGURE2.4-41
+o o o-#1'-, I....'!-., Q.!CI,)!2 CI,)CI,)
DllCHAME OUTFALL"ME SLUt WPP (FII - -
u 0 w 0 0 0 w 0 NI 3 D -3 *D C 2 C 3 D -3 wD 2 3 I -3 PI < I -1 , A 3 D 43 *D 0 z 0 3 -3 D WD 0 z 0 1 -3 PD 9 0 z 0 3 D D C z 3 9.P C c D d 3 VI ( I I d 0) I % *D 0 z 0 3 D -3 wD 0 z 0 3 3 C 2 0 D 3 D D 2 C 3 D -3 YL I 3 JD D C 2 3 -3 C 2 C 3 D C C 3 3 UP 0 z 0 D 3 3 WD C 2 C D G- 3 D P, C 2 I -3 YL -1 3 I *I C 1 -- Yl C c P -3 "I < c 91 < .z /' > 7-- I-i +-- I ~ !) PP om PD 0 z 0 3 D 0 z 0 3 D -3 9.9 0 z 0 3 -3 YD D 0 z 0 3 -3 YL WD D 0 z 0 3 -3 99 0 z 0 D t < D 0 -I - -I N C 5 0 -I rn W W D G c D 0 W 4 3 5 F C D -4 m W W D D 0 5 x) I! I0 N 1; W P 5 0 -I W W D g rn m I T LL om0 0 0 w 0 0 HYDRAULIC HEAD AND WATER LEVEL FLUCTUATIONS IN THE UPLAND TERRACE AQUIFER BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I-ex: Z-Z Z 0 0>0 Q..I-:::>N 0 W<<...J ex::::>...J>-
i=(f)I-<<ex:<<(/)Oa:<<a:>-:::>WI-W....J...J>a:u..(J)<<u..a:w5 z 0_1-0 0<<<<Q..w<<Z>-wQ..I W I-I(/)I-M W (D u, M 1(/)00-c1 O(/)ZZ c:: (f)-(J)<<<<0...J-W C\I W>I-W<<WW<<ex: ex:Iu..c:: 0:::>01-:::>Q..>-:::>(!)IZO u,-<<..TERTIARYZONE1PIEZOMETERP9 AQUIFER 70 70 f\0\C(-;:-......60 60:t--.'z r---JQ"'"
J"-.I,...J"""'-C(C("">50 50>-...:t ,.."'--40 40JFMAMJJA SON OJFM AMJJ AS0N OJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJ AS0N OJFMAMJJ AS0N OJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJA SON 0 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 TERTIARY ZONE 1 OBSERVATIONWELLT13 AQUIFER 50 50 u:;""1Q 40 40h/"<,...C(/"-.-->C(....--Y:--30 30JFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJA SONOJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJ AS0N OJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJA SON 0 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979TERTIARYZONE3 OBSERVATIONWELLTl4 AQUIFER 40 40 u:;r-Z"7 0 30/30"";:...C(1\<'-\.I\-/\1\",Y: 20.-V-20 15 15JFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJA SONOJFMAMJJA SONOJFMAMJJA SONOJFMAMJJA SONOJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJA SON 0 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 PIEZOMETER 8449MISSISSIPPIRIVER ALLUVIAL AQUIFER 40 40 ,/\I V\, 0C(-;:-30 y 30\ft.AA('zQ VVV V::::l"C(C(20 V\20>-u:::t'..J 10 10JFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJA SONOJFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJA SONOJFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJA SON 0JFMAMJJA SON 0 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 PIEZOMETER 8450MISSISIPPIRIVER ALLUVIAL AQUIFER 40 40-'\A"" V\n'\30\, 30 r 0 , VV\f\J C(-;:-20,Z20" ,.C(C("">0'">-u:: 10:t 10""'I 0 0JFMAMJJA SON OJ F loAAMJJ AS0N OJFMAMJJ AS 0 NOJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJ AS0N OJFMAMJJ AS0N OJFMAMJJA SON OJFMAMJJ AS0N 0 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 7.0 9.0 6.0'.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1979 1971 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1-1-
f-.'Ilr III rilL III[Ill!II 11 II I 1'["Ir ,II ,I I,,11[1;11.:
1],1 J II!ol!.j rJllIllII II liT 1..rl r I II nr.T T I III 111 II If 1 T Jlt 11 dllh ITtUI II III III II 111fT 11.il T J 1JFMAMJJAI50ND J FIMAMJIJA1SOINDJIF 1M'I IN 0 JIFIM AIAIJJA 510JFM AIMIJJA 101 J FIMIAIMIJIJA5 OIN DIJFM J I JA5I0 N Dj 3.0 1.0 2.0'.0 9.0 7.0 0.0 6.0 RAINFALLMEASUREDATRYAN AIRPORT,BATONROUGE, LOUISIANA 60.0 50.0 50.0 40.0 40.0;Z 030.0l:i20.0 20.010.0 10.0 M5l JFMAMJ JA50N0JFMAM JJA50N0JFMAMJJA 1972 1973 1974*ADJU5TEDFROMBAYOU5ARADATA
- MISSISSIPPIRIVERSTAGEAT PLANT SITE o JFMAM JJA50ND 1979 FIGURE 2.4-44 RAINFALL AND MISSISSIPPI RIVER STAGE DATA RIVER BEND 8TATIONUPDATEDSAFETYANALYSISREPORT
- e. WEEKLY DEWATERING RATE RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
OR 0 O] - -
t"""""
I 500 a lop0 I 0 '
I lu Nl8.000 +G -f N16.000 N24,000 -~ N22,000 N 20.009 4 N18,OOO t N161000 P7, TI, 815 -PIEZOMETER OR OBSERVATION WELL NUMBER @ -PIEZOMETER OR OBSERVATION WELL SYMBOL @9 4 -GROUNDWATER ELEVATION - -EQUIPOTENTIAL LINE (FEET ABOVE MSL)' (FEET ABOVE MSL)
I TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET 2 EQUIP01 ENTIAL CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET 500 Illllll,llr; lOO)&JO 300 500 IPIEZOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE UPLANC TERRACE AQUIFER, MARCH 17, 1977 UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT N20,000 + N18,OOO - u) u) u) u) - - z s , /I I N14.000 p N 20,000 - - t -
5 2
I .ig 4 500 0 500 1000 \ 1500 2000 2500 I,I THE , 1978 I BEND STATION N20,OOO N l8,OO 0 N16,000 ,
t N18L000 + N16,000 t N14,000 P7,B20- PIEZOMETER OR OBSERVATION WELL NUMBER -PIEZOMETER OR OBSERVATION WELL SYMBOL [38 51 - GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (FEET ABOVE MSL) - EQUIPOTENTIAL LINE (FEET ABOVE MSL) -
- I TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 EQUlPOTENTlAL 5 FEET CONTOUR INTERVAL 5 FEET Y METERS FIGURE 2.4-49 PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE OF THE UPLANC TERRACE AQUIFER, MARCH 16, 1979 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT z 0 60 2 Z 2' 80 - z 0 - 60 I
<* 9 0 a 3 00 I0 t
OF
~- -
RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
PREDICTED DRAWDOWN IN THE UPLAND TERRACE AQUIFER AND WELLS AT THE PLANT ZONE 3 AQUIFER DUE TO PUMPING RIVER BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 120 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 USGS WELL NUMBERS: WF-34 LOCATED IN FRANCISVILLE, 1781 FT DEEP, PRODUCTIVE ZONE IS THE "2800-FT SAND" OF THE BATON ROUGE AREA WF-222 LOCATED IN FRANCISVILLE, 1526 FT DEEP, PRODVCTIVE ZONE IS THE "2800-FT SAND" OF THE BATON ROUGE AREA WF-34 WATER LEVELS RECORDED BY THE USGS WF-34 W F-34 '58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 76 77 78 1979 TIME (YRS)
NOTE: FOR WELL LOCATIONS SEE FIGURE 2.4.-37 USGS WELL NUMBERS: EB-517C EMPLACED INTO THE "2,800-FT" SAND EB-794 EMPLACED INTO THE "2,400-FT" SAND WATER LEVELS RECORDED BY THE USGS \/ EB-517C I EB-794 \\ EB-794 ,4 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 19i TIME 50 70 90 - 100 - 110 -120 - 130 - 140 - 150 - NOTE: FOR WELL LOCATIONS SEE FIGURE 2.4.-37 2.4-52 DECLINE OF THE PIEZOMETRIC SURFACE IN THE TERTIARY ZONE. 3 AQUIFER RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYStS REPORT
~ 0 90 89O ?
i--
P i-- I 92 O 0 25 - 50 u H.N.
- O O O O MAP SHOWING SITE LOCATION IN THE GULF COASTAL PLAIN GEOLOGIC PROVINCE RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT E.C. LEGEND 0 SALT 3;OME 40 60 80 100 SCALE IN MILES 0 I 11 20 111'1'" 40 6: 80 100 SCALE IN KILGMETERS 2.5-2 LOCATION OF SALT DOMES RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
I I us 0 .
El Llc: e ,
d I 50 0 200 38 36 32 30 0 50 75 to0 -
OF , OF OF 2.5-4 I I RIVER BEND
I I
ALLUVIUM ---L
+RACE7 CITRONELLE -
-1 FLEMING- ~pAscAGouLA GRAND GULF HATTIESSUE~
CAT AH 0 U LA VICKSBURG JACKSON COCKFIELD COOK MT. PARTA CANE RIVER TALLAHATTA CLAIBORNE SABINE PORTERS CREEK CLAYTON MIDWAY NAVARRO TAYLOR -
AUSTIN EAGLEFORD WOODBINE EUTAW TUSCALOOSA
~ a 3 U 0 2 Lu pL U WASHITA- I FREDRICKSBURG UNDIFFERENTIATED TR INlTY , 1 PALUXY
--~- I I HOSSTON COTTON SCH U LER VALLEY BOSSIER HAY NESVILLE v, v) ry =) ---
LOUARK SMACKOVER NOR P HLET I LOUANN 1- WERNER EAGLE MILLS IN MILLIONS OF YEARS BEFORE PRESENT TIME PROVINCE SCOTT, K R.,
VOL.
2.5-5 REGIONAL STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
...
GULF OF MEXICO I.
OF 0 200 SCALE I00 200 2.5-6 GENERALIZED REGIONAL THICKNESS OF CENOZOIC DEPOSITS I I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT NORTH SOUTH SEA LEVE -300 -500 c Y 5 z 0 ii -900 3001 1 TENN ALA LA SITE 0 50 I 100 KILOMETERS OA SCALE OF CROSS SECTION NOTE: MODIFIED AFTER MURRAY, G.E. GEOLOGY OF THE ATLANTIC AND GULF COASTAL PROVINCE OF NORTH AMERICA.
HARPER AND BROS., NEW YORK, N.Y., 1961 AND SCOTT, K.R., HAYES, W.E. AND FIETZ, R.P. GEOLOGY OF THE EAGLE MILLS FORMATION.
TRANSACTIONS GULF COAST ASSOCIATION OF GEOLOGICAL SOCIETIES, VOL. 11, 1961 2.5-7 NORTH-SOUTH GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION OF COASTAL SEQUENCE THROUGH MISSISSIPPI BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
P THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED FROM: I. TECTONIC MAPS OF NORTH AMERICA USGS, AND 1969 EDITIONS 2. GEOLOGIC MAP OF PART OF SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES SHOWING OUTCROP AND SUBCROP AREAS OF PALEOZOIC AND OLDER ROCKS PREPARED BY PHILIP B. KING BY PHILIP B. KING,
- 3. THE OUAtHlTA SYSTEM REGIONAL STRUCTURAL MAP BY PETER 1. FLAWN, 1960 4. PHILLIPS FAULT OXLEY, E.M. AND RIDGEWAY, J.M. A STUDY OF THE JURASSIC SEDIMENTS IN PORTIONS OF MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA. TRANSACTIONS GULF COAST ASSOCIATION OF GEOLOGICAL SOCIETIES, VOL. P.24-48,
- 5. DIAGRAMMATIC MAP OUTLINING MAJOR STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF THE SOUTHERN ATLANTIC AND NORTHERN GULF COASTAL PROVINCE, MURRAY, G.E. GEOLOGY OF THE ATLANTIC AND GULF COASTAL PROVINCE OF NORTH AMERICA. HARPER AND BROS., NEW YORK, N.Y., 1961 FISK, H.N. GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ALLUVIAL VALLEY OF THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, DECEMBER 1944 SOLID CONTOURS - ELEVATION (MSL) IN FEET DASHED CONTOURS -ELEVATtON IN METERS IDENTIFICATION OF STRUCTURE CONTOURS OTHER THANBASEMENT TOP SIPHONINA ZONE TOP OF CRETACEOUS 2 BASE OF FERRY LAKE ANHYDRITE TOP CHRISTALLARIA ZONE 3 TOP OF COMANCHEAN TOP AMPHISTEGINA ZONE TOP OF CARRIZO
- 14. NEAR TOP MIOCENE MARKER 5 TOP OF FRlO UPPER PLIOCENE MARKER 6 TOP HETEROSTEGINA ZONE 16 "A" ZONE IN MIOCENE "W" ZONE IN MIOCENE 7 BASE OF AUSTIN 8. MID WlLCOX MARKER "L" ZONE IN MIOCENE
- 9. TOP OF COCKFIELD 19 "4" ZONE tN MIOCENE TOP MARGINULINA ZONE 20 MID MIOCENE MARKER 21 UPPER MIOCENE MARKER 0 50 100 150 200 SCALE -MILES IIIlrlI1.1 0 50 100 150 200 - SCALE - KILOMETERS 2.5-8 REGIONAL TECTONIC AND STRUCTURE MAP I BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 94 93 O 92" 91 O goo 87O 83. 82O 35' 34' 33' 32' 31' 30' 29' 2eq 2.5-9 MAP OF PRECAMBRIAN BASEMENT STRUCTURE BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED FROM: TECTONIC MAPS OF NORTH AMERICA USGS 8 EDITONS PREPARED BY PHILIP B. KING 2. GEOLOGIC MAP OF PART OF SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES SHOWING OUTCROP AND SUECROP AREAS OF PALEOZOIC AND OLDER ROCKS BY PHILIP B. KING
- 3. THE OUACHITA SYSTEM REGIONAL STRUCTURAL MAP BY PETER FLAWN
- 4. PHILLIPS FAULT It, P.24-40. IS67 0 50 I50 200 SCALE-MILES 200 SCALE -KILOMETERS 9 94O 93 O 91 ' 90. 88' 87O 86' 8 3. 82' 40 36' 35' 34' 33' 32' 31' 30' 8 t I. DATA IS FROM BOUdUER GRAVITY ANOMALY MAP OF THE 2.THE BASE MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED FROM: UNITED STATES (A@U USOS, TECTONIC MAPS OF NORTH AMERICA, USOS, AND EDITIONS PREPARED BY PHILIP 6. KING GEOLOGIC MAP OF PART OF SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES SHOWING OUTCROP AND SUBCROP AREAS OF PALEOZOIC AND OLDER ROCKS BY PHILIP B.KINO, 1961 THE OUACHITA SYSTEM REdIONAL STRUCTURAL MAP BY PETER T. PLAWN, I960 PHILLIPS FAULT, OXLEY, E.M. AND RIDOEWAY, J.M. A STUDY OF THE JURASSIC SEDIMENTS IN PORTIONS OF MISSISSIPPI AND ALABAMA. TRANSACTIONS dULF COAST ASSOCIATION OF GEOLOOICAL SOCIETIES, VOL. P.24-48, 0 50 100 I50 200 LlIlllIIl SCALE - MILES 0 50 t50 200 SCALE -KILOMETERS M
BOUGUER GRAVITY ANOMALY MAP I RIVER BEND STATION I UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT SOUTH ANSLEY McNEILL TATUM DOME COLLINS RALEIGH c LL 0 0 2 f _I > _1 a fJl J m I 0 NORTH KOSCIUSKO - MILES LEGEND 1-1 TERTIARY [s] LOWER MESOZOIC / / UPPER CRETACEOUS - STRATIGRAPHIC BOUNDARY -----REFRACTtNG HORIZON LOWER CRETACEOUS a) DIAGRAM SHOWING SHALLOW CRUSTAL STRUCTURE ACROSS THE MISSISSIPPI SALT BASIN BY STRATIGRAPHIC AND VELOCITY ZONATION.
FROM WARREN, D.H.. HEALY, J.H. AN0 JACKSON, W.H. CRUSTAL SEtSMlC MEASUREMENTS IN SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL.71. NO.
14, JULY I966 SOUTH ANSLEY McNElLL TATUM DOME COLLINS RALEIGH NORTH KOSCIUSKO
," 0 IIII 50 100 200 I-1 OLDER MESOZOIC MANTLE - GOOD FIRST ARRIVALS ---- OUESTIONABLE REFLECTIONS rm= SlALlC include Paleozoic) DIAGRAM SHOWING DEEP CRUSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE MISSISSIPPI SALT BASIN, INTERPRETED BY WARREN, HEALY, AND
- JACKSON, FROM THE AEC SEISMIC TRAVERSE OF 1964 0 50 75 I 0 NOTE: KlLOMETER SCALE FOR PROFILE LOCATION IN MISSISSIPPI SEE FIGURE 2.5-2 FROM EARGLE, D.H. AND HERBST, E.L. REGIONAL GEOLOGY THE SALMON EVENT.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE SYMPOSIUM ON THE GEOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY OF GULF COAST SALT. LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, BATON ROUGE, LA, MAY 1967 DEEP NORTH-SOUTH GEOLOGIC PROFILE THROUGH CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
LEGEND /
OF 0 5 20 -
0 20 - -
BEND STATION
' 0 20 60 I
- I.
OF ZONE OF OF 2.5-13 OF RIVER BEND STATION 0 0 - 2pI-O OF OF RIVER BEND STATION 50 0 50 CL- 30-00
- -
2.5-15
I I 0 2000 c z - 6000 I c e 8000 1- -
+
IS
+ \ 0 -2000
-6000 -8000 VOL.
2 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
I GENERALIZED WEST FELICIANA
// CROSS SECTION
- EAST FELICIANA PARISH low i Pl ROUGE e~4 1 LEGEND C1 FREELAND C2 UNNAMED C3 PORT HUDSON C4 UNNAMED C6 IRENE C7 FALSE RIVER C8 PROFIT ISLAND C9 COMITE C10 LOCKHART CROSSING C11 WATSON C5 MOORE-SAMS W1 ALSEN W10 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 TI2 T13 T14 T15 T16 T17 T18 T19 T20 T21 LlVONlA REBECCA BAYOU LO BD ELL DENHAM SPRINGS ERWINVILLE ROSEDALE EAST GROSSE TETE PORT ALLEN UNIVERSITY BATON ROUGE SIEGEN NESSER HOPE VILLA MALLETS BLUFF ADDIS BAYOU CHOCTAW NW BAYOU CHOCTAW MORRISONVILLE MANCHAC POINT SARDINE POINT BURTVILLE
@
SEE FIGURE 2.5-34 FOR GENERALIZED CROSS-SECTION J-J' 0 5 10 - L1-I 1 'p - OIL AND GAS MAP SHOWING MAJOR FAULTS UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
F EL iic I I
\ I Wl8C - - -- I SEE FIGURE 2.5-22 LEGEND. r$- - GAS WELL 0 - DRY HOLE SEISMIC SURVEY LINE - FOR CROSS SECTION K-K SURFACE PROJECTION OF ZACHARY FAULT FROM FAULT PICKS IN WELLS TO THE SOUTH. l! MAP NO. WELL NAME IC 2w 3w 4s 5c 6C 7s 8s 9w low I IC 12s 13s 14C 15s 16C 17C C 20c 21 c 22c MONCRIEF No. I BUTLER KlLLlAM No. I JOHNSON KlLLlAM No. 2 JOHNSON ALLAUN No. I ROSEDOWK MONCRIEF No. I ROSEDOWN SOUTH LOUISIANA PRODUCTION No. I WITTER BAYOU SARA No. I FAIRGROUNDS CAVALIER No. I MACKIE LA GRANGE No.1 McKOWEN PRECISE - DAMSON NO. I LANGLOIS HUNT No. I LANGLOIS TUNICA-HOMER NO. I B.R.O. G. TUNICA-HOMER NO. 2 B.R.O. 8 G. LA. LAND 8 EXPLORATION No. I CROWN ZELLERBACH CAVALIER No. I MILLS WAGNER No. I JUMONVILLE AMOCO No.1 SMITH AMOCO No.1 ANDREWS (SIDETRACK SOUTH TO PRODUCTION FROM
- 17) AMOCO No.1 DANIEL AMOCO No. I SCHEYNAYDRE TATHAM No. I CAJUN ELECTRlC MAP No. SYMBOLS: S = SHALLOW(AB0VE WILCOX) w = WILCOX C = CRETACEOUS SEISMIC SURVEY LINE A N 0 AC ATT 277 (AMOCO) 278 (AMOCO) 279 (AMOCO) 280 (AMOCO) DATE REF 1976 87 1975 07 1951 87 1951 87 1951 87 1951 87 1951 87 1970 88 1982 96 1982 96 1982 96 1982 96 TOTAL DEPTH 15,961 8,204 10,017 7,530 18,760 17,814 2,364 4,529 10,010 12,500 16,540 3,162 4,3 27 17,835 5,392 I31 l7,t 26 17,258 DATE i978 1956 1957 1946 i978 I9 80 193t 1937 1960 1972 1980 I92 I 1924-6 1980 1937 I 1980 15,730 1981 17,573 1982 18,085 1981 012345678 1 1 1 1 1 1 SCALE-KILOMETERS 0 i 2 3 4 5 ~~ SCALE -MILES 2.5-1 8 LOCATION OF TEST HOLES AND SEISMIC SURVEY LINES FOR PETROLEUM EXPLORATION BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
+
t - a a u) u) u) u) - - +
@RID N
t t
500 0 500 1000 2000 2500 111
+ RIVER BEND STATION i((i\",+.",";","-",+.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
..:.:.:.:.:.:
.:.:.:.:..:..:..:..::=::::::::::::::::::::::::
- [i::[:[::[::[*[i.:::*::\: illl 1111111111111\11\11111\1
..........................
+****X\J\f\NOTE:UPLANDSAREESSENTIALLY COVEREDWITHLOESS EXCEPTINERODEDSTREAM VALLEYS LEGEND:[::;::?:;;:}:1 CITRONELLE fORMATION oPORTHICKEY FORMATION C]HOLOCENEFLOODPLAIN o 500 1000 ISOO 2000 2500,IIIIISCALE-FEET o 300 600 900 I I I I METERS FIGURE 2.5-20SITEGEOLOGICMAP RIVERBENDSTATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
SEA - LEVEL -2,000 FT -4,000 FT -6,000 -8,000 FT -10,000 FT -12,000 -14,000 FT -1 6,OO 0 -18,000 -20,000 FT -22,000 FT -24,000 -26,000 FT HOLOCENE-
-~ PLEISTOCENE PLEISTOCENE - PLIOCENE - ._____.____-.
PLIOCENE MIOCENE 0 LIGOCENE EOCENE PALEOCENE UPPER CRETACEOUS LOWER CRETACEOUS UPPER JURASSIC __------ u PALEOZOIC
(?)
I
-- SAND SILT CLAY V ERYFlNElilmSr HOLOCENE FLOODPLAIN' SAND G'IAVEL CLAY SAND GRAVEL CLAY LOESS PO &KEY CITRONELLE
-- -l----- 1-1 I SANDSTONE, CLAY VICKSBURG I LIMESTONE AND XCK3 0 N I COCKFIELD COOK MOUNTAIN CANE RIVER TALLAHATTA I SPARTA 1 # ,CLAYSTONE I UPPER I UNDIFFERENTIATED CHALK AND MARL TUSCALOOSA SAND AND CLAY DANTZLER SAND AND CLAY LIMESTONE I WASHITA- FREDRICKSBURG CLAY, SAND PALUXY AND LIMESTONE LIMESTONE GLEN ROSE JAMES - SLIGO LIMESTONE HOSSTON CLAY, SAND COTTON VALLEY AND LIMESTONE HAY NESVILLE LIMESTONE, SALT (?), AND REDBEDS (?) I SMACKOVER-NORPHLET LOUANN-WERNER(?)
EAGLE MILLS(?) BASE M E NT C 0 M P L E x?) METAMORPHICS-GRANITE 2.5 SITE STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT TUNICA- HOMER NO. I . CAVALIER NO. I MACKIE TUNICA- HOMER NO. 2 B.R.0.8 G. I
+zoo0 4
&
TD4327 I 11 -0255 I
I - + - - - - - - - - - -
& =
Illllllll 0 5000 0
2000 I I
&
I GEOLOGIC CROSS-SECTION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
+
+ N20,000
-_
N 20.000
- -t N - -7 !y lq00 2yo
+ N'2*000 FIGURE 2.5-23 BORING LOCATION PLAN RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
, I 8 0 25 n t I ClT.lo0 a
2.5 - I I BEND
5000 7 000 9000 I
I I -200
&
c]
I[111
- & -
S & -
08 - 50 0 s 2 -50 ii 4
-200 0 200 300 500 2.5-25 GEOLOGIC SECTION RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I I
I - I us 8
- 5. ~~
2.5- 26 IN BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 300 - 200 - -100 - -200 - -300 - - -500 - 0 5 4
-_ I.
TO I E I0 . E IuRE2.5-27 I
L 2 9 E d c 2 s? 2 E 2 c 1 9 > 4 Lu 80 0 -80 80 0 -80 (102)
(107) (112) c 2 E 2 (124) I I I I 80 0 -80 y.
80 0 -80 80 -80
]]
mj
--_. - i 2 E -1 OF 2.5-24 0 50 METERS FEET - 80 c 2.5-28 SHALLOW GEOLOGICAL CROSS SECTIONS IN PLANT AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 80 0 -80 80 0 -80
- w@p 0 (116) w 80 0 - -80 80 0 -80 I I I I I 17 80 0 -80 I . . . . . . . . . . . . .
--a_-
--
/ - &
0 50 l!!!!!!!!!J 0 sp rqo l!jO 200 FEET 2.5-29 SHALLOW GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS IN PLANT AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 80 c u 2 z 0 4: > 4 0 ...*. ..... ..... ...(I).. -- V - I I' z 0 U 2 A 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 -
0 2 4 6 8 U-lDLmU
.. -
OF 2.5-30 SHALLOW GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION 1-1' IN PLANT AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- - 0 200 600 0 50 200 2.5-31 BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
+200 4 s t z - +loo z 0 > I) b- I I I I I I) I) 4 > 1 I
I 0
+200 0 0 2 4 1 I
-~
2.5-32 TERRACE PROFILES ALONG THOMPSON CREEK RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
-7 I 0246810 11111111111 SCALE- MILES 0 2 4 6 8 10 11111(11111
,- --
' - LEGEND --- APPROXIMATE OUTLINE OF FLOODPLAIN
--- LINES ENCLOSING AREAS OF SIMILAR THICKNESS OF LOESS 12-14 FEET) A SAMPLED TO 4 FEET FOR MECHANICAL A N ALYS I S AN D DE S CR I PTI 0 N S . 0 SAMPLED TO THE DEPTH OF THE PRE- LOESS SEDIMENTS FOR MECHANICAL ANALYSIS AND DESCRIPTIONS.
SAMPLED TO THE DEPTH OF THE PRE- AN A LY S I S . 0 LOESS SEDIMENTS FOR MECHANICAL SITE 12 AND EASTWARD HAS A MIXED ZONE OF LOESS AND PRE-LOESS SEDIMENT FEET THICK. TRAVERSE NO.l, SITES 1 TO 5; TRAVERSE N0.2, SITES 6 TO 12. SOURCE: SPICER, B.E. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE LOESS DEPOSITS AND SOILS IN EAST AND WEST FELlClANA PARISHES, LA., LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, MASTERIS THESIS, 1969 SCALE-KILOMETERS M
2.5-33 LOESS RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT IoU0 0..--'..-<C(-'CJ'):::>><C(u....-<C(IoU-'..-0:::>>U<0:::>>u..0::t IoU U OIl:-'Z:::::>>0>0..->-..-OIl:<C(:::>><C(JI co co co SEA LEVEL 30 Yo!0 0..--'..-:::>>-'<<C(('0-I.L...-CJ')IoU-'..-:::>>Z-'-'<0:::>>:: u..CJ')<>>-0 u..0 0Il::::>>OIl: Z<C(::t LU<C(-'::t..-<C(....UOIl: co 0<C(o u NCL ('0-CJ')10 IoU 0 0 IoU u......IoU::t CJ')CJ'):::>>0 IoU 0 U IoU<C(..-..-U IoU IoU OIl:..., U 0 OIl: ClI: CL IoUIoU 0 r:D<C(-'u, u, CJ')10 MILES....
...
......IiMl_..
...10 MilES o LEGEND R-lOWER CRETACEOUS BARRIERREEFAT SHelF EDGE NOTE FOR LOCATION OF CROSS-SECTIONSEEFIGURE 2.5-17 FIGURE 2.5-34 DIAGRAMMATIC NORTH-SOUTHGEOLOGICSECTION J-JI'THROUGH SITERIVERBENDSTATIONUPDATEDSAFETYANALYSISREPORT
, Sp; w - SOUTH 28000 NORTH FIGURE 2.5-35 SE ISMIC RE FLEC TI0 N SURVEY PROFILE BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT AXISOF ANTICLINEAXISOFSYNCLINETECTONICP.ROVINCEBOUNDARYNORMALFAULT;HACHURESONDOWNTHROWNSIDE EARTHQUAKECATALOGNUMBER-SEETABLES 2.5-3,4,5 FOR EARTHQUAKE REFERENCF!i
- III-IVTOIV*VTO VI-VII*VIITO VIII*IXTO XI-XIITECTONICFEATURES LEGEND N 1111\\111\\1\
21*FIGURE 2.5-36 REGIONAL EARTHQUAKE EPICENTERS AND TECTONIC FEATURES REFERENCES MODIFIED MERCALLI FISK,H.N.GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONOFTHE ALLUVIAL VALLEYOFTHELOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION,USARMYCORPSOF ENGINEERS, DECEMBER 1944COHEE,G.V.
TECTONICMAPOFTHE UNITED STATES.UNITED STATES GEOLOGICALSURVEYAND AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, 1962.BECHTEL CORPORATION, FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT.MISSISSIPPIPOWERAND LIGHT COMPANY,GRANDGULF NUCLEAR STATION,DOCKETNOS.
50-416/417, JUNE 30,1978 FLAWN, P.T.;GOLDSTEIN, A.;KING, P.B.;AND WEAVER,C.E.THE OUACHITA SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, BUREAUOFECONOMICGEOLOGY, PUBLICATION NO 6120, 1961.HADLEY,J.B.AND DEVINE, J.F.SEISMOTECTONICMAPOFTHE EASTERN UNITED STATES.MAP MF-620, UNITED STATES, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1974.86°__35°57A TENNESSEE ALABAW;:-83*81°73*59o*BIRMINGHAM 74__3,°0 50 100 150 200 I.II I ISCALE-KILOMETERS 30" 0 50 100 150 200 I I I I r 0SCALE-MILES C 29*88*88°89°90°92°40*8AS IN MISSOURIARKANSAS--
37°*--=::s:""""'-;;:::--I--.L__
ARKOMA 94°I I53 31*71*9'5°"'r r-----r---+-------+---+-----+--+------+---+--+-*-r----r--39° 36
____L 96°31 0-,-----f--t----i;;-_+-__+-L_.L_30° 28°RIVER BEND 8TATIONUPDATEDSAFETYANALYSISREPORT 95' 39 0 LEGEND 200 I 200 I 150 I RIVER BEND 8T A TION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FIGURE2.5-37FELTAREASOF EARTHQUAKESMAY7,1842 FEB.1, 1955NOV.6,1958NOV.
19, 1958OCT.15,1959 100 ISCALE-MILES50100150IIISCALE-KILOMETERS 50 I REFERENCES NOTE:FELTAREASAREBASEDONEVALUATIONOFFELTREPORTSTECTONICPROVINCEBOUNDARYAXISOFSYNCLINENORMALFAULT;HACHURESONDOWNTHROWNSIDEAXISOF ANTICLINE o I 1\\11111\\1\\TECTONICFEATURES o I FISK,H.N.GEOLOGICALINVESTIGATIONOFTHE ALLUVIAL VALLEYOFTHELOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER.MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION,U.S.ARMYCORPSOF ENGINEERS, DECEMBER 1944.COHEE,G.V.TECTONICMAPOFTHEUNITEDSTATES.
UNITEDSTATESGEOLOGICALSURVEYAND AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, 1962.BECHTELCORPORATION, FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT.MISSISSIPPIPOWERAND LIGHT COMPANY,GRANDGULF NUCLEAR STATION,DOCKETNOS.
50-416/417, JUNE 30,197B.FLAWN,P.T.j GOLDSTEIN, A.jKING,P.B.jAND WEAVER,C.E.THE OUACHITA SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS,BUREAUOFECONOMICGEOLOGY,PUBLICATIONNO.
6120, 1961.HADLEY, J.B.ANDtlEVINE, J.F.SEISMOTECTONICMAPOFTHE EASTERN UNITED STATES.MAP MF-620, UNITED STATES, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1974.86°o BIRMINGHAM o 88 0
..
36 0__
BAS IN MISSOURI ARKANSAS--
37 0 ARKOMAV)V)ZV)<l-I 38 0+-
I I
to--+.-
<l'V)
",ll:: O:<t: OUACHITA I...-L I
+---34 0 30 0-r-L 2P.° I 28° 0 I -. 'w 870 TECTONIC FEATURES NORMAL FAULT; HACHURES ON DOWNTHROWN SIDE AXIS OF ANTICLINE 3- AXIS OF SYNCLINE \\\\\\\\\\\\\ TECTONIC PROVINCE BOUNDARY NOTE: ISOSEISMALS ARE BASED ON EVALUATION OF FELT REPORTS. INTENSITIES ARE MODIFIED MERCALLI SCALE. REFERENCES FISK, H.N. GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE ALLUVIAL VALLEY OF THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION, U S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, DECEMBER 1944. COHEE, G.V. TECTONIC MAP OF THE UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS, 1962. BECHTEL CORPORATION , FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. MISSISSIPPI POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION, DOCKET NOS. 50-416/417, JUNE 30,1978. FLAWN, P.T.; GOLDSTEIN, A.; KING, P.B.; AND WEAVER, C.E. THE OUACHITA SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS, BUREAU OF ECONOMLC GEOLOGY, PUBLICATION NO. 6120, 1961. HADLEY, J.B. AND DEVINE, J.F. SEISMOTECTONIC MAP OF THE EASTERN UNITED STATES. MAP MF-620, UNITED STATES, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1974. 0 50 200 -
0 50 200 I I I I - FIGURE 2.5-38 ISOSEISMAL MAP OF THE OCTOBER 19, 1930 EARTHQUAKE RIVER BEND STATION I I UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 36' 32.
36" 32" 2.5-39 AREA AFFECTED BY EARTHQUAKE OF DECEMBER 17, 1931 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 3! 33 32 9P felt
\ 89' @. 92' 90' IS' 13' 2' ISOSEISMAL MAP OF THE EARTHQUAKE OF JUNE 1967 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
SOURCE: NUTTLI, O.W. THE MISSISSIPPI VALLEY EARTHQUAKES OF AND 1812; INTENSITIES, GROUND MOTION, AND MAGNITUDES.
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, VOL. 63, NO. I, FEBRUARY, 1973 GENERALIZED ISOSEISMAL MAP OF THE EARTHQUAKE OF DECEMBER 16, 1811 RIVER BEND STATION I UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
~. 0 500 -
0 I 2.5-42 SEISMIC RISK MAP OF THE UNITED STATES I 1000 9CO 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 90 80 70 60 50 30 20 10 9 6 5 3 1 v 0 =
9, A = 1930 ~
2.5-43 EARTHQUAKE INTENSITY - ATTENUATION CURVES FOR MISSISSIPPI VALLEY AREA ~~ ~ RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT RIVER BEND STATION PLANT AREA' DONALDSONVILLE AREA^ EL. 95 1 EL. 70- EL. 60- EL. 20 EL. -40 TO -50 PLANT GRADE EL. 10 TO 20 MSL GROUND SURFACE .. ~~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . '. .. .. .' .- 1 ,. .. EL, 0 FOU N DATlON LEV EL-SEISM IC CATEGORY I STRUCTURES COMPACTED BACKFILL DENSE SAND DENSE PLIOCENE- PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS SAND AND GRAVEL EL. -105 APPROX. EL. -200 LEGEND 1-1 GRAVEL SAND SILT CLAY 1. SUBSURFACE PROFILE OF SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURES
- . . .' .. .. .. .. *- I< . zz NATURAL LEVEE SANDS AND SILTS HOLOCENE BACKSWAMP DEPOSITS (SOFT)
CLAYS AND SILTY CLAYS HOLOCENE SUBSTRATUM DEPOSITS SAND AND GRAVEL PLEISTOCENE CLAY DEPOSITS 2. SUBSURFACE PROFILE FROM COMPARISON OF FOUNDATION STRATIGRAPHY AT RIVER BEND S A U C I E R , R .T. G E 0 LOG I C A L I N V EST I GAT I 0 N OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER AREA, ARTONISH TO DONALDSONVILLE, LA., U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION, VICKSBURG, MI, TECHNICAL REPORT NO, 5-69-4,1964 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
900 800 700 600 500 300 200 100 90 70
- 60 > z 2 y 20 a (Y 80 30 9 7 6 5 3 -- I- G.lg + .O I I I I I I I .--.- I1 v 2.5-45 EARTHQUAKE ACCELERATION - INTENSITY RELATIONSHIPS I I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
, 5000 3000 2000 900 400 200 90 40 50 30 20 9 6 5 I I I 0.5s - Log 0.05s .o. - (I) 2.5-46 COULTER, WALDRON AND INTENSITY RELATIONSHIP DEVINE ACCELERATION - RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I: 0' 54 00 o* c v! I 9 e. 3 0 0 e. 6 c a 0 I I I I I I I I - - - 9LN 9023 - - "
5 02 i I I I 1 I 9 I c v! c w 0 z w 13 z 3 0 a (3 t- U ZB Qk?
I - i / - - 19: 0 - .5 0 - .5 J I I \ \ \ \ 0 m Ly m cy a c
I 2.5-49 CONTOURS OF SUBSIDENCE INDUCED BY GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWAL IN BATON ROUGE FROM 1935-1976 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
SIM
?Of,-
SIM SIM SIM I I I SILT I I I
US.
It I I I I
I ?lNf t I COWLS I I I I I 1
R SIM SIM I I I I I COAm I FIGURE 2.5-50 I RIVER BEND STATION I ii f 5 5
$JM I I I I cow I SlM I I I
I OR NOTE: FIGURE 2.5-51 RIVER BEND STATION r UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOR'
U.S. DROMm It U.3.
SIM DROMETE R SIM U.S.
US.
R -90 A1 00 loo 05 000s 0 0.05 lo ' I I mrnu I
U.S.
I I *we I SILT I
INDIVIDUAL GRAIN SIZE CURVES PRESENTED IN APPENDIX 23 FIGURE 2.5-52 115 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOR' BORING 146 BORING 148 BORING B LOWS / FOOT 20 30 50 60 I I I I I BORING 144 BLOWS/ FOOT BORING 147 BLOWS/ FOOT 20, 30 40 50 60 I I I I BLOWS/FOOT BLOWS /FOOT 40 50 20 30 I I I 50 I 20 I 30 I I +! 8 6 s - - 4 22 > .J 2 a 6 % lo( 6( _p_ - - 4(
- 2c 2 a > -I C 60 -80 SOIL COLUMN SYMBOLS wj GRAVEL 0. 1 - L L - - S - SAND +++ - L - - s - ra CLAY SHADED ZONES ON N-VAL h-y SOIL EXCAVATED
+++
+++ -+--- +++ - &--& +++ +++ +++ '+iip++ +++ CLAY LAYER c I I? > -I (11 a
- 1. N-VALUES SHOWN GRAI BOTTOM OF SAMPLING -
CLASSIFIED IN AC( THE UNIFIED SOIL CLASS1 z > .J 0 a -2c -4c 80
+++
- 3. FOR SEE LOCATION FIGURE 2.5-72 OF THIS S 4. SYYF)OLS FOR STRATIGRAPH L - LOESS PH - PORT HlCkEY TOP-Sl - SANDS *I CLAYEY BC - CITRONELLE BURIED SANDS, GRAVELS PC - PASCAGOULA CLAY +++
+<+; +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
++Sp++
+++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ t++ +:S@: +++
t++ + + +( +++
+++ +++ +++
.0.8. -
I 2.5-53 N-VALUE PROFILES FOUNDATION ST PLANT SITE I BEND UPDATED SAFETY A
- L L PH - - S - - 1. BORING 100 +
+
+
+++ +++ +++ +++
+++
+++ +++ +++ BLOWS/FOOT 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10 130 I I I I I I I I 1 I I ;I$$; +++ ++
+ f2& ++sc ++ ++ i :+5c;+
++ i ++ + ++sc++ ++ ++ ++ + ++ +
++ i ++ i ++ + ++ + ++ i +++
- +++ +++
+
+
+
+++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ $$ ?x
+++ +++ +
+++ +++ +++ +++ +++
++sw+ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
+++ p?# Lh!L -6b - -100 I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I BLOWS/ FOOT 10 30 $0 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 I I , 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 E.O.B. 130 120 5 100 60 4_ - - t- z 0 F a > -I 20 0 - - 2c - 4c - - 8( - lo( BLOWS/ FOOT 20 30 40 50 60 70 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I p ++SC++ +:st+: +++ +++
+++ +:sp+:
+++ +++ +++ +++ I+++', + E.O. 8. +++
+++ I:++ + + +
+++ +++
+:sp ; +++ +++ +++
+
+
+
+++ +++ +++
+++ +++ ++i +++ 130 120 100 80 60 z - - t- z 0 a > -I 20 0 80 - 100 BORING SOIL COLUMN SYMBOLS pl GRAVEL 0 ,.. Fi SAND +++ SILT CLAY SHADED ZONES ON N-VALUE GRAPHS, h-y soiL EXCAVATED CLAY LAYER IN SlTU SOIL UPPER LIMIT OF ZONE OF INFLUENCE SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURE
- 1. N-VALUES SHOWN GRAPHICALLY AT BOTTOM OF SAMPLING INTERVAL. 2.SOILS CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. 3. FOR LOCATION OF THIS SECTION SEE FIGURE 2-5-72 4. FOR DEFINITION OF SYMBOLS FOR STRATIGRAPHIC ZONES SEE FIGURE 2.5-53 FIGURE 2.5-59 N-VALUE PROFILES, SECTION FOUNDATION STRATIGRAPHY PLANT SITE AREA I UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
BORING BORING
+++ gB
+++
++++++ +++ +++ +++ $c& @,qbT
+++ +++ ++t
++SP+,
++sp+t +++ ++t +++ ++t +++ ++t +++ +++ ++t ++i +++ ++t +++
+:st+: +++ +++ ++i ++se+i ++sp+i
+++ ++i +++ +++ ++i ++i +++ ++i +++
+++ ++- +ASP+. BLOWS/FOOT 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10 130 - I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I :+:+It
+++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
+++ +++ +++
+++ +++ +++ 120 t -80 t L - 100 I I I I I I I I I I I I 130 120 3 100 80 60 2L - t- E 40 z t- > -I 0 a 0 40 8C - 1oc BORING BLOWS/FOOT 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 10 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 130 rn 100 80 60 g - t- E 40 z 2 l- a > -I 20 0 - 2c - 4c - 6C - 8( - 10( BORING BLOWS/FOOT 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 130 120 "is 100 80 60 v - - I- 40 2 0 I- a > -I 2c - 2( - 4( 10 BLOWS,'FOOT 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10 I I I I I I I I I I I I LEGEND SOIL COLUMN SYMBOLS [IIIIIIim SILT CLAY SHADED ZONES ON N-VALUE GRAPHS Kl SOIL EXCAVATED CLAY LAYER IN SlTU SOIL UPPER INFLUENCE SEtSMIC CATEGORY LIMIT OF ZONE I STRUCTURE OF NOTES: I. N-VALUES SHOWN GRAPHICALLY AT BOTTOM OF SAMPLING INTERVAL.
- 2. SOILS CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. 3.FOR LOCATION OF THESE BORINGS, SEE FIGURE 2.5-72 4. FOR ZONES DEFINITION SEE FIGURE OF SYMBOLS 2-5-53 FOR STRATIGRAPHIC 2 5-62 N-VALUE PROFILES BORINGS 119, 126, 121,162 FOUNDATION STRATIGRAPHY PLANT SITE AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 130 120 B 100 80 60 z;z - - I- W E 40 z I- > w -I 20 u z! 0 40 BORING 135 BLOWS/ FOOT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 130 120 ?? 100 80 60 LL - - w 40 z 0 a > .J 0 40 80 - 100 BORING 136 BLOWS/FOOT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 130 120 5 100 80 60 y_ - - I- w E 40 z 2 a > w .J 20 0 40 - - - 10( BORING 137 BLOWS/ FOOT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I + \ 130 120 fl 100 80 60 v - w 40 z 2 a > w .J - - 4( - 6( - - 10 BLOWS/FOOT 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOIL COLUMN SYMBOLS SILT vA CLAY SHADED ZONES ON N-VALUE GRAPHS I\u SOIL EXCAVATED CLAY LAYER IN SlTU SOIL UPPER LIMIT OF ZONE OF INFLUENCE SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURE I. N- VALUES SHOWN GRAPHICALLY AT BOTTOM OF SAMPLING INTERVAL.
- 2. SOILS CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM. 3. FOR SEE LOCATION FIGURE OF THESE BORINGS 4. FOR DEFINITION OF SYMBOLS FOR STRATIGRAPHIC ZONES SEE FIGURE 2.5-53 2.5-63 N-VALUE PROFILES, BORINGS 135, 136, 137, 138 FOUNDATION STRATIGRAPHY PLANT SITE AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT BORING 154-0 BORING 154-C BORING BORING BLOWS/ FOOT 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 BLOWS/ FOOT 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 20 30 40 50 I I I ! I I I I I I I I BLOWS/ FOOT 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 20 30 40 50 BLOWS/ FOOT 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 10 20 30 40 50 LEGEND SOIL COLUMN SYMBOLS 130 120 130 130 120 130 120 GRAVEL 0 00 120 3 100 2 100 7 100 [IIIIIIIIIII SILT kTj CLAY 7 100 SHADED ZONES ON N-VALUE GRAP F] SOIL EXCAVATED CLAY LAYER 80 80 80 NOTES: N - VALUES SHOWN GRAPHICALLY BOTTOM OF SAMPLING INTERVAL I- E 40 z 0 I- a > W -I 2c W W E 40 z > 0 a W 2 40 t- 2 2. SOILS CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANC THE UNIFIED SOIL CLASSlFlCATlO' z t- U > W -1 20 W 0 z f! - BC 3. FOR LOCATION OF THESE SEE FIGURE 2.5 > W -I 20 W a ... - +-+ **- __. -I 20 4. FOR DEFINITION OF SYMBOLS STRATIGRAPHIC ZONES *** ... 0 0 ... _.. ... ... w CH - 2C 20 ... . 'SP.. 8C PC - .. ... m CL CH CL CL - 4(
2 5-64 CH N-VALUE PROFILE BORINGS 154-A 154-6, 15 FOUNDATION STRATIGI PLANT SITE ARE) - 6( 60 80 - RIVER BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSI 101 - 1oc - 1oc
ISOW - - yl - c yl n 0- 190 - 200 - -
0' 0 30 SO 70 80 90 100
% !*I I I I #
I0 0 30 f_ 5 I- I n 0 I- yl 200 b,c,d,e OF 5" I 2 Fv 0.5 I 10 5, ,
fl I I 6.V = = = =
FINE %
2.5 RIVER
BEND STATION I20 80 0 -80 80 0 -80 l\ 80 0 80 c. Y; i 12 80 0 -80
-
0 20 40 50 - I FIGURE 2.5-67 EXCAVATION CROSS SECTIONS RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT ,
7 c Ly 80 0 -80 80 0 - -80 \ \ 80 0 -80 r]
.............
--
-- - 80 0 .80 0 50 II,I,I, 20 30 50 c Ly FIGURE -2.5-68' EXCAVATION CROSS SECTIONS BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
\ loo 2 00 300 400 w, z 10 m a z 0 :: 00 m z - w I 100 100 050 050 000 000 10 20 30 - It0 2+0 3+0 I 1100
+50 2000 5600 FOR
~
2.5-69 RIVER BEND STATION z 0 : z 0 50 100 150 200 250 135 .200 .150 z 0 ki z .loo r c .050 .ooo : 5 r z 0 c 0 50 100 150 200 250 136 50 100
.200 .150 .loo .050 .ooo 0 50 100 150 200 25 109 136 (30' 50 FIGURE 25-70 '0 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 300 0 z 0 .200 x c .loo .050 0 0 100 200 300 - -
+48 , ,300 P % 0 .200 x F .1 oa .050 0
+38 0 100 200 300 109, 113, 135, 136, 137, & 138
.300 P .200 x E F .I .05C 0 0 100 200 300
-12 306 P .200 x F .loo .050
-92 0 200 300 IN-SITU CROSS HOLE TIME-DISTANCE DATA VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
't, \
25-72 '
1 APRIL 0 N c 0 EL a N \ 7 BACKFILL TO APPROX EL v \ \ v EXCAV EL 20 t BACKFILL TO APPROX EL EL I BACKFILL TO EL 0 i j I I I \ \ I I I I I I EXCAV -zi'- i EL N 1760 -4 N 1740 N 1720 N 1700 N 1680 N N 16401 NOTES 1. SCALE: = 50 U 0 2. UNIT 2 SIMILAR TO UNtT 1 EXCEPT AS SHOWN.
- 3. DASH LINE INDICATES BUILDING FOUNDATION OUTLINE.
- 4. CLASS I FILL IS OA CAT I FILL, ALL OTHER FILL IS NON-CAT I FILL. BERM CENTERLINE FLOOD CONTROL BERM SECTION.
- 5. -----INDICATES FLOOD CONTROL 2H Ic- '*'--+I / CLASS GRADE LG SOUTH PLANT ROAD ~ EL
.--- ,----- */ -- PLANT EXCAVATION BACKFILL PLAN WITH BERM RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT t I Z a 2 > 30 B
=
= 1
\ -
I It III Ip 3.r 2.5-72b
SUMMARY
OF SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS-UNIT 2 EXCAVATION CUT SLOPES I MORGENSTERN-PRICE - SSE LOADING I RIVER BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
' t I 2 ' z i- s 0' ,c / =
=
d =
[ FIGURE 2.5-72c
SUMMARY
OF SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS UNIT 2 EXCAVATION BACKFILL SLOPES SIMPLIFIED BISHOP - ALL LOADINGS I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
=
& = t- I 2 a 2 > -
1 II:
m 19 P
2.5-72d
SUMMARY
OF SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS UNIT 2 EXCAVATION CUT SLOPES SIMPLIFIED BISHOP - ALL LOADINGS BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
\\ - 50 2.5-72e
SUMMARY
OF SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS UNIT 2 EXCAVATION CUT SLOPES SIM- PLIFIED BISHOP-ERODED, OBE & STATIC UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 90 80 70 60 50 z 2 30 4 20 t 0 30
_ FIGURE 2.5 -73 PERFORMANCE OF THE DEWATERING SYSTEM RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
U I
I I/? 3~8 10 30 50 100 200 Y v) 3 0
- IY 30 3 2i
- 20 3 a - --- --- 0% 0% 0% 0% 0
& 'u 2 E >. 80 00 I I I I I m N \ - c) I 2.0 2 a = Iy 0: c 0 I v &- 0.2 $ a 0 90 h' 6g a Ly 61 0 a a, 0 20
- 7. 60 50 I % 0 to 13 = -
FIGURE PLANT BACKFILL LABORATORY TEST RESULTS BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT h Y I P b Ix 60 - X X x txx x X X X X xfX X X X X X X X X xrc xx X X X X X X X X lllt lrr'J' raili I'I Ifi ' If 1111',1 '
2.00 CU FIGURE 2.5-75 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (YD) VS. COEFFICIENT OF UNIFORMITY (C, ) - SEISMIC CATEGORY I BACKFILL RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 119 118 117 A u. 114 113 112 X X X xXxx% x X X X X X X X X X xxx x xx xX X X X X X X 111 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.00 2.10 2.20 2.30 2.40
- 322, FIGURE 2.5-76 MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY (YD) VS. Cr - SEISMIC CATEGORY I BACKFILL I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I
- I! 0 C R rn -.1 0. OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 SI 80 60 50 J
=
=
c
= 4
(%)
(%) -- - -= - -
2.5-78 DEGREE OF COMPACTION DlSTR IBUTION I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT LOADILIN.
FT. I OF w kFGj) SOIL* YwHZ-I WATER f 1 I I I *APPLICABLE FOR ~g H~ ; IF H~ =-
SHOULD BE TAKEN TO BE EQUAL TO HI SINCE STANDING WATER DOES NOT AFFECT THE MAGNITUDE OF EFFECTIVE STRESS y,= UNIT WEIGHT OF WATER y, = UNIT WEIGHT OF SOIL (TOTAL) AT REST EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENT AKAE = ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENT FOR EARTHQUAKE a = SEISMIC COEFFICIENT FOR DESIGN COMPACTOR Hcl = 6' Hc2 = 14' 1080 PSF
2.5 STATIC
AND DYNAMIC LATERAL PRESSURES RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 65. 20--
4 v! z c Lu -
- z 0 >
w c a Lu 4 Lu -1620 *
-2000. 350 61 m 318 I 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 //
IX
& +20 & +95 466 I 467 468 469 409
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I I I I I 0' 00' 800' 2800' 3600' 2.5 - - - - - -
0 - - - - - -
0 - FINITE ELEMENT PROFILE MAIN PLANT AREA RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANAtYSfS REPORT
.END OF STEP 2 STEP 1 STRIPPING OF 5 TO 20 FEET OF OVERBURDEN DEWATER FROM ELct57 TO =EL0 EXCAVATE FROM EL+95 TO EL+20 STEP 2 BACKFILL FROM EL+20 TO EL+65 RECHARGE WATER FROM EL 0 TO ELz+57 STEP 3 BACKFILL FROM EL+65 TO EL t95 RESULTING PERMANENT HEAVE AT END OF STEP 3 REPRESENTS THE EFFECT OF THE STRIPPING FIGURE VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
+ N22.000 -t N20.000 -N24,000- ,N22,000 N20,000 NOTES VERTICAL DATUM: MEAN SEA LEVEL AS ESTABLISHED BY US. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY
- 2. SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT DELETED. 3. WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT ADDED.
LOCATION El 7,600, N14.500 (LCN 01.02-009)
- 4. GENERATION SUPPORT BUILDING ADDED.
LOCATION El 8,200, N17.400 (LCN 01 008) 0 INDICATES BENCHMARK LOCATION +Nle+""""
I BENCH 2 3 4 5
- COOM, m5.0 m5.0 c00r0 18l97.0 m.5 1
-~
BEND
' L - 0 0 CJ c 0 0 9 c 0 FIGURE 2.5-83 EXTENSOMETER LOCATION PLAN RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
- 3 *7 8,
t l5 t
- .- -- 599 ___-
P- \
8, T 110 94 110 - 94 15 -- REPORT 7 r- 7' \ E 1 L -
NOTE 22-27 65 0 l7poo 0 I50 - _. ..
I I RIVER BEND STATION
__
I00 80 $ 60 I 40 0 u 20 t- z > w do - 20. 0.7. 0.6. 0.5 0.4. 0.3- 2 0.2. 0 I. -I- I----- -- \ \ \ MEASURED ESTIMATED pi t Pcf - ESTIMATED pi t pc ------ EL.20 _--- -EL.- I0 ______- --- -- EL .- 40
_ r--- & EL. EL - 200 0 r DI IF' 'A' 'A' '0' 'DI IF' 'A' IJ' 'A' '0' '01 'F' 'A' 'J' 'A' '0' 'DI 1976 197 7 1978 FIGURE 2.5-86 HEAVE DISPLACEMENT VERSUS TIME - EXTENSOMETER E2 RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
> 4 a a 3 -
\ 100- V / / \ \ 20 0.5 \ ,- - - - - - - - - - - - - \ / \ hy-
\ '/ \- -
6------d pi pc ------
pi pc 1976 1977 1978 FIGURE 2.5-87 HEAVE DISPLACEMENT VERSUS TIME - EXTENSOMETER E3 RIVER BEND STATIQN UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT I20 IOC 2 CL z > w 0 a 80 60 40 20 A0 06 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0. I 0 ESTIMATED p u/ ,/- -I -, __--- .I '\ \ _---- __-- --_---- -t Pc 11 'F' 'A' 'J' 'A' '0' 'Dl 'F' 'A' 'J' 'A' '0' 'Dl 'F' 'A' 'J' 'A' '0' 'DI 1376 1977 1978 2.5-88 HEAVE DISPLACEMENT VERSUS TIME - EXTENSOMETER E4 UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT t- tL I > I *2 I 0.6 - - 0.4 - - 0.2 - - / 0- END 20 FIGURE 2.5-89 SECTION A-A DISPLACEMENT PROFILE ACROSS EXCAVATION RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT v, z t- LL I z 0 t- 6 >
HEAVE EN0 OF EXCAVATION
/ / 1- ----- HEAVE - FEET FIGURE 2.5-90 HEAVE DISPLACEMENT VERSUS ELEVATION RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 0 0 g 0 0 9 co 0 0 0 rc' 0 0 9 3
,,I ,, , lty ISp. 270 500 SCALE - FEET 200 300 400 500 SCALE - METERS t r-ADD11
't i 80 60 100 80 60 tn z Y Z 0 I00 2 100 > 80 8.0 60 60 I 1'20 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I 100 80 80 60 60 I
------ -
IONS FIG.
6
-
& I00 2oo GWT 0 > -J -200 P lr m Ip P ILI I
\ n IP! P P -
I ------ I I -------- I -\ ------ m PI 130 32O 32 36 36 -
- 35) 35
} }
I II
} =
t .log -
200 400 600 100 0 50 0 3 BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 3
WESTERN TERMINATION OF 50 MAPPED ZACHARY FAULT 0 45 0 PORT HUDSON FIELD 52 0 11 0/8900 0 0 39 57 0 0 44 53 54 47011 1030 I-\- / ALSEN FIELDL\ 1 INDIVIDUAL WELLS \ NOTSHOWN ,I 55 '--- .130/14560 r FAULT IN LA DEPT. OF CONSERVATION HEARING-1982 DOCKET 82-742 (HOZ #2) DEPTHt17.200 FT. 0 \ X INDICATES SURFACE PROJECTION FROM FAULT 0 PICKS IN WELLS TO THE SOUTH-SEE TABLE FOR OTHER FAULT PICKS IN PORT HUDSON WELLS (CLAIBORNE AND DEEPER) THROW (FT)/DEPTH (FT)
SHOWN BY WELLS WITH ZACHARY FAULT PICKS 1 2 - MILES MAP NO. 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 WELL NAME GEORGIA PACIFIC #1 TEXACO STATE LEASE 7590 AMOCO BICKHAM
- l B.T.A. PRODUCTION GEORGIA PACIFIC #1 OH AMOCO COLLIER
- 1 AMOCO BICKMAN
- 1 FRANKFORT BICKMAN
- 1 AMOCO GEORGIA PACIFIC #2 AMOCO LORMAND
- 1 AMOCO BICKHAM
- 2 B.T.A. PRODUCTION STATE LEASE 7591 TEXACO STATE LEASE 7591 AMOCO PENNINGTON FEE #4 PENNCO PENNINGTON
- 1 AMOCO PENNINGTON FEE #1 AMOCO PENNINGTON FEE #2 HESTER PENNINGTON
- 2 PENNINGTON BROWN #1 AMOCO PENNINGTON
- 3 AMOCO LEBLANC
- 1 PENNINGTON CARRUTH #1 EXXON LEBLANC #2 MCGUIRE SOLVANT
- 1 CAVALIER ANNISON
- 1 AMOCO CORONA #1 SHELL MCVEA
- 1 SHELL HUGHES #1 TEXAS KNIGHT
- 1 SOHIO WATSON
- 1 ROWLEY PENNINGTON POPE #1 L.L.&E. HARVEY #1 WOMACK BARBER #l FRANKFORT BARBER #1 MARTIN O'NEAL
- 1 B.T.A. PRODUCTION ALBRITTON
- 1 EXXON J.B. LEBLANC SLAPCO SAMUEL
- 1 SLAPCO MCCOLLISTER
- 1 SLAPCO KIZER #1 SLAPCO LELAND COLLEGE #l HUNT TRANS-MATCH A-1 STH OH STH OH STH OH STH OH STH OH STH OH STH OH - ORIGINAL HOLE STH - SIDE TRACK HOLE TOTAL DEPTH 17450 9000 6954 6878 2700 767 1 031 5 6680 5230 7111 7141 4110 16930 11 750 18468 16870 10339 10300 7300 6900 0300 7340 0820 4801 7200 8244 9800 1500 0000 10006 19221 831 5 12500 13842 18053 17926 201 00 20226 19112 14813 18863 18888 19504 19285 19180 14387 20225 19226 DATE 1977 1980 1979 1979 1980 1979 1960 1979 1979 1980 1980 1980 1980 1973 1979 1979 1962 1955 1979 1981 1955 1981 1958 1937 1980 1979 1980 1952 1976 1953 1981 1968 1957 1981 1981 1980 1981 1981 1980 1981 1981 1981 1979 1980 1978 1981 1981 1980 ZACHARY FAULT 4017065 45111330 40/7000 35/8020
? 20/7150 4019250 4019420 40/5310 240 / 1 21 00 180/11620 40/9460 40/9540 6011 0980 1 10 /8900 470/11030 13011 4560 550/17000 OTHER FAULTS 110/10710 13011 0910 8011 1850 70/ 11 750 40/9420 6011 0550 1 1450 130f 9720 13011 1240 1 ZACHARY FAULT SURFACE AND WELL LOG POSITIONS I RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT
\ 30 0
I I I I - - - - -
FIGURE 2.5-97 ZACHARY FAULT IDENTIFIED IN WELL LOGS RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT DIESEL GENERATOR BUILDING SETTLEMENT E T L E M E N T I N E E -0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 92 182 273 365 457 547 638 730 822 912 1003 1095 1187 1277 1368 1460 1552 1643 1734 1826 1918 2008 2099 2190 2281 OCT.1,1979 IN 2 -3
-4 4-2.5-98 SETTLEMENT HISTORY DIESEL GEN. BLDG -
BEND UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT S E T T N T I F E E T CONTROL BUILDING SETTLEMENT
-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 182 273 365 457 547 638 730 822 912 1003 1095 1187 1277 1368 1460 1552 1643 1734 1826 1918 2008 2099 2190 2281 TIME OCT*l,1979 IN DAYS LEGEND : MARKER 6 8 4-2.5-99 SETTLEMENT HISTORY CONTROL BLDG STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT S E T T L E M E T I F T AUXILIARY BUILDING SETTLEMENT
-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 92 182 273 365 457 547 638 730 822 912 1003 1095 1187 1277 1368 1460 1552 1643 1734 1826 1918 2008 2099 2190 2281 TIME AFTER OCT.l,1979 IN DAYS 8-e 19 - 20 LEGEND : MRRKER - 21 4 -
S T E T I N T FUEL BUILDING SETTLEMENT
-0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0- 0. 0. 0. 0. 0 92 182 273 365 457 547 638 730 822 912 1003 1095 1187 1277 1368 1460 1552 1643 1734 1826 1918 2008 2099 2190 2281 TIME AFTER OCT.1,1979 IN DAYS e--B-B 11 6a--h 12 - 13 LEGEND : MFIRKER 14 4-REACTOR BUILDING SETTLEMENT T I N F E E 02 0 -00 0.02 0 *04 0 -06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0 -20 0 022 0 *24 0 =26 a -28 0.30 0 032 0 -34 0 -36 0 -38 0.40 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 92 182 273 365 457 547 638 730 822 912 1003 1095 1187 1277 1368 1460 1552 1643 1734 1826 1918 2008 2099 2190 2281 TIME RFTER OCT.1,1979 IN DRYS LEGEND : MRRKER 8--8--e 15 17 -
2.5-1 02 SETTLEMENT HISTORY REACTOR BLDG RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT S E T T L E M E N T I N F E E T -0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. O* 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. BF TUNNEL SETTLEMENT 4 -
2.5-103 SETTLEMENT HISTORY BF TUNNEL RIVER BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT E TUNNEL SETTLEMENT n N I N E E -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TIME IN
- MRRKER -
- 6- ~ ~~
I SSWCT SETTLEMENT 4-S E T T M E N T I F G TUNNEL SETTLEMENT
-0 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.
\
0 -
@ 2.5-107 (SHEET 1 OF 2) GENERAL ARRANGEMENT AND SECTIONS SHOWING PARTIALLY AND COMPLETELY I BURIED SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURE5 1
UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT r c I STANDBY I SERVICE WATER TOWER I I HVC-018-7-3 ii n NORMAL BLDG / B TUNNEL B TUNNEL (DIESEL GEN. BLDG) I (CONTROL BLDG)
! 100 80 t; 60 4 40 LL s 3 20 ii u- I 60 >- w 20 z 0- 4 t; LL -60 I 2 -40 p -20 1 \ 0 40 4 20 CLASS I FILL Y CLASSII FILL CLASS I FILL EL 20 / LIMIT OF EXCAVATION IN SlTU SANDS
& GRAVELS b IN SlTU SANDS
& GRAVELS CLASS IT FILL 7 \ EL 94 100 t- 0 40 4 20 100 80 5 60 I 2 40 I- LL 0 3 20 ii;: LL 60 z 40 I- 20 0 3 ELECTRICAL DUCTLINES
-/ z CLASS I FILL W EL 20 i;: 20 \ ELECTRICAL1 CLASS I FILL DUCTLINES LIMIT OF EXCAVATION IN SlTU SANDS & GRAVELS FO IN SlTU SANDS & GRAVELS 1 ------ r-- -- -- -- -- - 1 00 0 5 40 ii li 20 ! EL 94 1 00 80 60 40 t 20 1 00 80 60 40 20 0 3 LyUEb 1 DlESELBGLEONGERATOR (EL 67) (EL 64) t- U. I I z 0 3 z t- A 0 3 401 I CLASSI FILL 0 4 LIMIT OF EXCAVATION 1 IN SlTU SANDS
& GRAVELS IN SlTU SANDS
& GRAVELS n F I I I E 100 F 40 3 w 20 MOIST SATURATED SUBMERGED ANGLE OF UNIT.WT. UNIT.WT.
FRICTION TYPE DESCRIPTION UNIT.WT. 1 - . t- F TUNNEL (EL 66) (EL 61) CLASSII FILL CLASSI FILL CLASSILFILL
$EgFkn CLEAN SAND 120 PCF 130 PCF 68 PCF 36 DEG 130 PCF 68 PCF SANDWITH NA IN-SITU SANDS GRAVEL 2.5-107 (SHEET 2 OF 2) DEG GENERAL ARRANGEMENT AND SECTIONS SHOWING PARTIALLY COMPLETELY BURIED SEISMIC CATEGORY I STRUCTURE:
IN SlTU SANDS
& GRAVELS to BEND STATION UPDATED SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT