L-16-330, Notification of Completion of License Renewal Commitments

Notification of Completion of License Renewal Commitments

ML16327A066
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	11/18/2016
From:	Boles B FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-16-330
Download: ML16327A066 (6)

Text

FENOC' 5501 North State Route 2 Oak Harbor, Ohio 43449 RrstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Brian D. Boles 419-321-7676 Vice President, Fax: 419-321-7582 Nuclear November 18, 2016 L-16-330 10 CFR 50 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

SUBJECT:

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 Docket No. 50-346, License Number NPF-3 Notification of Completion of License Renewal Commitments By letter dated August 27, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML102450565), FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FE NOC) submitted an application pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 54 for renewal of Operating License NPF-3 for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (Davis-Besse). The Davis-Besse Renewed Facility Operating License issued December 8, 2015(ML15316A056), includes license condition 2.C(11)(b), as follows:

(b) This License Renewal UFSAR Supplement, as revised per License Condition 11 (a) above, describes certain programs to be implemented and activities to be completed prior to the period of extended operation.

1. The licensee shall implement those new programs and enhancements to existing programs no later than October 22, 2016.

2. The licensee shall complete those activities as noted in the Commitments applicable to Davis.Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1, in the License Renewal UFSAR Supplement no later than October 22, 2016 or the end of the last refueling outage prior to the period of extended operation, whichever occurs later.

3. The licensee shall notify the NRG in writing within 30 days after having accomplished item (b) 1 above and include the status of those activities that have been or remain to be completed in item (b)2 above.

The purpose of this letter is to notify the NRC that FENOC has accomplished items (b)1 and (b)2, as required by License Condition (b)3, above.

Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 L-16-330 Page2 There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions or if additional information is required, please contact Mr. Patrick J. Mccloskey, Manager- Regulatory Compliance, at (419) 321-7274.

Sincerely, Brian D. Boles cc: NRG Region Ill Administrator NRR Project Manager NRG Resident Inspector Utility Radiological Safety Board

REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW FORM NOP-LP-4007-01 Rev. 03 Page_of_

(1) LETIER NUMBER: (2) LETIEf3

SUBJECT:

Notification of Completion of License Renewal Commitments L-16-330 (3) SUBMITIAL DUE: (4) PREPARER November 21, 2016 Name: Steven R. Dort PHONE N0.:419-321-7662 (5) POSTING REQUIRED (6) LICENSING BASIS DOCUMENT (7) OATH OR AFFIRMATION REQUIRED BY 10CFR19.11 CHANGE REQUIRED:

0 YES [8] NO 0 YES [8] NO DYES [8] NO (8) PREPARER COMMENTS, SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: J (9) LICENSING, TECHNICAL STAFF AND MANAGEMENT REVIEW Signature indicates that the review is complete in accordance with NOP-LP-4007, and to the best of the reviewer's knowledge; the submittal is accurate and complete, and no significant information has been presented in or excluded from the submittal such that the reader could be misled. Management reviewers' signatures also indicate that the level of review provided by their respective organization is acceptable. Where commitment ownership is indicated, signature indicates acceptance of responsibility for completion of the identified commitment. Where Enclosure Verification is indicated, signature indicates that the content of the identified enclosure has been verified to be complete and accurate by the assigned organization.

Name & Organization Commitment Enclosure Signature Date No Comments Ownership Verification Comments Provided Preparer 11/15116 NA NA S.R. Dort Peer R~vi~wer _.A ....

\I ..f\ .'NIV\1-i\/\ll.){qv '-

\\.Jn/u~ ~

Supervisor v G.M. Wolf o K.S. Zellers, Mgr Tech Svcs NA NA l"1'\1~ i.. ~ U K.W. Byrd, Dir Site Eng NA NA J>Ja/JR . ., _ 0 11 In.Ju..

I

• 1:1 D T.J. Brown, Dir Site Perf lmpr D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D (10) RECOMMENDATION FOR SIGNATURE Name & Organization Commitment Enclosure Signature Date No Comments Ownershio Verification Comments Provided P.J. McCloskey, NA NA D Mgr Rea Compl.

• 6;.-r~ ~ ela.~ dt~:J*~

(11) REVIEWER COMMENTS - NO RESPONSE REQUIRED~ments requiring response on Form NOP-LP-4007-03):

1/t~/e.&1"- .

ts'~ <e>/z:.oi-.c..

REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE CHECKLIST NOP-LP-4007-02 Rev. 02 Page 1of2 Letter Number/Subject" L-16-330 The reviewers of this correspondence signify the review of the items on the checklist by placing initials in the boxes below. As necessary, explain deviations, exceptions and non-applicable items in the Comments sections provided.

A. Peer Review:

No. Item Checked Initials

1. Correct organizations are listed on the review and routing forms, including organizations providing statements of fact. \J*'N

2. References to Codes and Standards are accurate and in sufficient detail. ~

3. Subject line of an NRC cover letter references the NRC TAC number, if applicable. NA

4. The letter number has been entered on the letter and subsequent paQes. W<'W

5. Format and presentation are consistent with NORM-LP-4003 and any deviations justified. W"

6. Pages containing information pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390 are appropriately marked. NA

7. Oath or affirmation (if reauired) - unsworn declaration is present. NA

8. Dates are correct and consistent throuQhout the submittal.

9. Grammar, spelling and editorial presentation have been verified to be correct. \J~

10. All applicable parts of the submittal are present (e.g. letter, enclosures, attachments, affidavits). 'J:-i(l{'J

11. If Regulatory Commitments are included in NRC correspondence, the regulatory commitments are re-stated on an attachment (Regulatory Commitment List) to the submittal and identified for ownership on the Regulatory Correspondence Review Form (NOP-LP-4007-01). If no regulatory commitments are a

included in NRC correspondence 1 statement to that effect is 12rovided in the corres12ondencg, For non-NRC corresponaence, no statement reQardinQ reQulatorv commitments is necessary. ~Krf

12. The letter content is factually complete, is presented logically and supports conclusions reached. ¥,J(W

13. Enclosures and attachments are appropriately identified and contain all the necessary information to fl/ON~

support conclusion of the submittal without the need to obtain other reference material. Vf('l'I

14. If action is requested of the NRC, the requested action date has been included with appropriate NA justification.

15. If the letter is in response.to NRC requests, there is a clear tie between each question/request and the associated response, and each question/request is completely and clearly answered in the response. V.ktV

16. References listed have been reviewed, are available, and support the information contained in the

• correspondence.

~

-i:. 'f v'kri 17.

18.

19.

Statements of fact have been verified to be accurate.

Actions stated as being complete have been verified to be complete. **

~-t V*1V Submittal does not contain information that has a material effect on information previously submitted to bOt:S VkW the NRC in response to a Notice of Violation or other enforcement action (e.g., Davis-Besse head * ;JOl event) or may significantly affect the NRC's understanding of plant activities. If it does, expedited communication paths with the NRC have been determined. Wtw Review Performed By (Print Name and SiQn): Date:

Comments:

1. 3. No NRC TAC number is applicable to this correspondence.

1. 6. No information pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390 is contained in the letter.

1. 7. No Oath or affirmation required.

1. 14. No action is requested of the NRC in the letter.

a~d Ml!. u.rct.+ ie..

\jQ\t.dQ..-hol'\ \"l&'J f'Qvilu'.>e.c\ Gn.~ vu-ifzed +o b~ . comQ)e.-+-R

~V\Q.Wa..Q PruJec.t/QA.t'Y\ l'Y\Q..M bceJZ7.

b~ 'the Lie.Qn'JQ -

REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE CHECKLIST NOP-LP-4007-02 Rev. 02 Page 2 of 2 Letter Number/Subject L-16-330

8. Cognizant Manager Review (Final Submittal Review Prior to Signature Authority):

No. It--:- ':'""ecked Initials (Comment~obtained during the review cycle have been resolved and incorporated within the applicable 1.

~~.:~.1::. u1 the submittal. The submittal remains factual and complete. Jr

~

2. Review signatures, or equivalent, have been obtained on Correspondence Review Forms (NOP-LP-4007-01 ).

~

3. The correspondence has been reviewed for regulatory commitments, licensing positions, prudency, appropriate wording, and potential regulatory impact.

4. If the letter is in response to NRC questions or requests, there is a clear and complete response to each question or request and all questions have been satisfactorily addressed.

-~

~~-c.-c.4~- - -- )

"~:/z ~

Review Performed Bv (Print Name and Sign): Patrick J. Mccl6Si<~ "cs. Date: "8 z. cu;.

L Comments:

~ \t\

d("~ *.}.~ \..£(\'e'\~/

& () "'~

L/ P**'"'~ . ~ \~H-er ~<-e{ (,.!)~+t....

e.<>rr....i <We. ,,AJMwf-

~

c. Responsible Organization Review (Administrative Support Follow-up):

No. Item Checked Initials

1. Date is on the letter and the letter has been put on the appropriate company letterhead.

2. Submittal cover letter is signed correctly.

3. Oath or Affirmation (if required) - unsworn declaration is present. If a notarized statement is requested by the signature authority, the statement page is signed and notarized.

4. When appropriate, initial notification and copy of submittal has been provided to the NRC via electronic mail. /

5. Submittal has been mailed, or provided electronically (in accordance with NRC guidance on electronic submittals) to all appropriate recipients, with aooropriate enclosures, attachments, etc.

6. Internal FENOC distribution is complete.

7. Regulatory Commitments have been documented in accordance with FENOC commitment management procedures.

8. Additional FENOC actions have been documented, as necessary, in appropriate activity tracking systems.

9. Correspondence documentation package is complete, and ready for future referral.

'

Review Performed By (Print Name and Sign): Date:

Comments:

Wolf, Gerald M.

From: Dort, Steven R.

Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 9:27 AM To: Wolf, Gerald M.

Subject:

L-16-330 Package U:\FENOC\DB\ALL\All-DB\License Renewal\1.0 Project Management\1.06 Correspondence\1.06.01 NRC Correspondence\02 NRC Out\L-16-330 LR Commit Completion ~ / /_

e:> \\r- t l5 /""t'A "'"° Steven Oort Davis-Besse Aging Management Coordinator 419-321-7662 (Internal 880-7662) 1