ML16099A151

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRR E-mail Capture - Accepted for Review of Brunswick Units 1 and 2 - Proposed Alternative for ASME Code Section XI ISI Requirements (RR ISI-06), Cacs MF7494 and MF7495
ML16099A151
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/08/2016
From: Andrew Hon
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Murray W
Duke Energy Corp
References
MF7494, MF7495
Download: ML16099A151 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Hon, Andrew Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:28 AM To: Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)

Cc: Beasley, Benjamin

Subject:

Accepted for Review of BRUNSWICK Units 1 and 2 - Proposed Alternative for ASME Code Section XI ISI Requirements (RR ISI-06), CACS MF7494 and MF7495 By letter dated March 10, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16084A161), Duke Energy (the licensee) submitted the subject request for alternative to the NRC staff for approval. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Andy Hon, PE Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN O8H19 Mail Stop O8G-9a andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2764 Mail Envelope Properties (Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov20160408092800)

Subject:

Accepted for Review of BRUNSWICK Units 1 and 2 - Proposed Alternative for ASME Code Section XI ISI Requirements (RR ISI-06), CACS MF7494 and MF7495 Sent Date: 4/8/2016 9:28:15 AM Received Date: 4/8/2016 9:28:00 AM From: Hon, Andrew Created By: Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Beasley, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Beasley@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)"

<Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1783 4/8/2016 9:28:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Hon, Andrew Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:28 AM To: Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)

Cc: Beasley, Benjamin

Subject:

Accepted for Review of BRUNSWICK Units 1 and 2 - Proposed Alternative for ASME Code Section XI ISI Requirements (RR ISI-06), CACS MF7494 and MF7495 By letter dated March 10, 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16084A161), Duke Energy (the licensee) submitted the subject request for alternative to the NRC staff for approval. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Andy Hon, PE Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN O8H19 Mail Stop O8G-9a andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2764 Mail Envelope Properties (Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov20160408092800)

Subject:

Accepted for Review of BRUNSWICK Units 1 and 2 - Proposed Alternative for ASME Code Section XI ISI Requirements (RR ISI-06), CACS MF7494 and MF7495 Sent Date: 4/8/2016 9:28:15 AM Received Date: 4/8/2016 9:28:00 AM From: Hon, Andrew Created By: Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Beasley, Benjamin" <Benjamin.Beasley@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Murray, William R. (Bill) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com) (Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com)"

<Bill.Murray@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1783 4/8/2016 9:28:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: