ML14234A366

2014-07 Draft Outline Comments

ML14234A366
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper
Issue date:	08/04/2014
From:	Vincent Gaddy Operations Branch IV
To:	Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
References
50-298/14-007 50-298/OL-14
Download: ML14234A366 (3)

Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Facility: CNS First Exam Date: July 2014 Written Exam Outline (5/9/14)

Comment Resolution KA overlap from last two exams CNS response-Each listed question was 295026.EA2.02 (2011 exam) Q13 (2014) reviewed with the 2011 and 2012 exams as 206000.A1.08 (2011 exam) Q30 (2014) listed and none of the questions on the 2014 239002.K3.03 (2012 exam) Q43 (2014) written exam are overlap questions. (EJJ 262002.K4.01 (2011 exam) Q48 (2014) 5/20/2014) 1 263000.K2.01 (2012 exam) Q49 (2014) 201003.A1.03 (2012 exam) Q55 (2014) 295018.A2.03 (2011 exam) Q79 (2014)

Tier 3-G2.3.4 (2011 exam) Q71 (2014)

Tier 3-G2.3.6 (2012 exam) Q98 (2014)

Tier 3-G2.4.18 (2012 exam) Q74 (2014)

Administrative JPM Outline (5/9/14)

Comment Resolution The type codes for each admin JPM can The type codes have been reviewed and only be C, S, or R, based on where you revised as necessary. The K/A numbers plan to run it for the exam. If it can be have been added as requested.

run in multiple locations it is best to run it outside the sim for schedule reasons, unless it truly is dynamic, then we would want to run it in the simulator. You guys 1 have all three of these codes for the first three RO admin JPMs and all five of the SRO admin JPMs. Also, can you put the KA below each JPMs description for proper job link on the ES-301-1 form? I know the form doesnt have that yet but it should be in the next revision to the 1021.

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (5/9/14)

Comment Resolution The type codes for each sim JPM can The type codes have been reviewed and 1 only be C or S based on where you plan revised as required.

to run it for the exam (see above).

Shift JPMs down on es-301-2 form so JPMs have been aligned for consistency 2 that the letter always matches the right between the different license types.

JPM. For example, JPM c should be OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

left blank for SRO-I since it is the one not used. This is important for clarity reasons for the exam team and reviewers. Same is true on the SRO-U outline. You can also put all three of these (RO, I, and U) on one form if you like. I will explain how on the phone call.

It is hard to believe that we havent run JPM "f" could not be found in the bank.

3 the JPMs f and g before in some However JPM "g" is in the bank. ES 301-2 fashion. Discuss on the phone call. will be revised to reflect this.

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (5/9/14)

Comment Resolution No critical tasks labeled or explained in The critical tasks have been labeled.

1 narrative. Ensure they are bounded IAW 1021 when resubmit outlines.

Scenario 1 - events are out of order The scenario has been revised and the from narrative. Event 6 should be right events are in order. The TS calls are before before event 9. Also, having the TS call the major.

after the major is never a good idea-if they miss it because they are in EOPs 2

they can argue they are on their way to mode 3 anyway and so I recommend something else for the other TS call, prior to the major. Event 8 should be after event 5.

On scenario 1event 5 when they start This scenario has been revised a lot and the reducing power and the htr drn valve, power oscillations are not going to be an how does it fail (open or closed) and also issue. The scenario as written would have what are the consequences if they enter the plant scrammed before Reactor the Therm Inst Region (is this your THI Recirculation was lowered enough to set up 3

acronym) and start getting power the loss of feedwater heating pushing power oscillations (ie is this critical task to not up into the exclusion region.

do this)?

Event 13 - is this both and I and C malfunction?

General comment on all three scenario D-1 forms have been revised to indicate D1 forms:it is a good idea to put the which position the event is intended for.

4 board that will most likely get the bean next to the letter for event type (ie R{ATC} ).

Scenario 2, event 9 is not in the narrative The RR seal begins leaking and then the RR 5 section. Is the major a LB LOCA on the piping break occurs making for a larger loca.

suction of RR or a RR pump seal LOCA?

General comment on the narrative-when The narratives have been revised to include you have a failure, discuss the failure more information to help reader understand 6

briefly (mostly did a great job on that), the procedures entered as requested.

then discuss which board operator does OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

what to compensate, and what procedure is used to combat that event.

This helps us in counting procedures, understanding failures, and so on. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process