ML24197A075

2024-06-Public Forms

ML24197A075
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper
Issue date:	06/12/2024
From:	Heather Gepford NRC/RGN-IV/DORS/OB
To:	Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD)
References
Download: ML24197A075 (1)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief: Kirkland Facility: CNS 6/18/2024 U/I: Start of Op Test: 6/10/24 6/14/2024 Due Date Date Complete Initials 10/9/2023 5/10/23 11/13/2023 5/10/23 11/13/2023 5/10/23 11/13/2023 8/28/23 11/13/2023 9/1/23 11/27/2023 8/28/23 1/8/2024 9/26/23 1/22/2024 N/A N/A 3/4/2024 1/3/23 3/25/2024 N/A N/A 4/8/2024 N/A N/A 4/22/2024 5/13/24 5/6/2024 5/29/24 5/6/2024 5/29/24 5/13/2024 5/13/24 5/13/2024 5/8/24 5/20/2024 5/10/24 5/27/2024 5/22/24 6/3/2024 5/29/24 6/3/2024 N/A N/A 6/3/2024 5/30/24 6/3/2024 5/15/24 6/3/2024 5/29/24 6/10/2024 6/10/24 6/28/2024 6/26/24 7/8/2024 6/24/24 7/16/2024 6/25/24 7/16/2024 6/26/24 7/23/2024 6/25/24 7/30/2024 7/8/24 8/6/2024 N/A N/A 8/6/2024 7/9/24 8/6/2024 6/25/24 8/27/2024 N/A N/A 9/3/2024 7/12/24 9/10/2024 N/A N/A Rev. 12 Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and waiver/excusal letters sent On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications Administer Operating Test Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due Form 2.2-1 Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed Facility licensee management feedback on the examination requested by the NRC supervisor Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners BC signs Exam Approval Letter (Form 2.3-1) Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee Form 2.3-1 signed by CE & BC Peer review of written exam complete Form 2.3-5 Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and reference materials due. Written exam and operating test reviews completed Document review on Forms 2.3-1 and 2.3-5 NRC-prepared examinations approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded for facility licensee review Feedback approved by Branch Chief Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee NRC examiners and facility contact assigned Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due Forms 1.3-1, 2.3-1, 3.2-1, 3.2-2, 3.4-1, 3.3-1 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-2.1.F Corporate Notification Letter sent Letter 2.1-1 produced by CE NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact Forms 4.1-BWR/PWR and COMMON Date of Written Exam: Description Notes Examination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials End of Op Test: Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam grading completed Branch Chief review of exam results completed Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 12, Forms 2.1-1 and 5.1-1 Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated Signed ES 303's to BC produced by CE License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals Examination Report Issued 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed. Post exam comments and graded exams received Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: Cooper Date of Examination: 6/20/2024 (Y)es I (N)o Item Task Description a b* C

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the z

instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories are y y w I-appropriately sampled. I-1:2

b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

y NIA y

s:

C. Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are acceptable. y NIA y

a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, y

NIA y instrument and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients. 0:::

b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of 0

!;i: applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule y NIA y ...J without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on ~ subsequent days. en Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 C. y NIA y and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and y

NIA y quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2.

a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on y

NIA y Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s).

b.

Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified en in the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' y NIA y ~ Cl.. audit test(s). C. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items y NIA y are duplicated on subsequent days.

a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities y

NIA y (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).

b. Assess whether the 1 O CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 1 O CFR 55.45 sampling is y

NIA y ...J appropriate. <(

c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater 0:::

y NIA y w than or equal to 2.5. z w (.9

d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams.

y NIA y

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

y NIA y

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior y

NIA y reactor operator). Printed~ 1e1"* V Date

a. Author John Kirkland

/. ~P'.'...""~ f/8/c.4

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

NIA f I f) I /1

c. NRG Reviewer(#)

Chris Harrinaton \\!AN\\ </A~ ~ I rs-J;i,.,/ NRG Chief Examiner John Kirkland /IJ._,£- ( 'f:l \\.._? p / 1 S/8)2.4 ' /) ~ NRG Supervisor HeatherG-*, 11 I o~.,/-/f./.,4 ~

fh,,..._,,,{

~/,..:J~hl_ I I

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NR~~

ped test~"'/

1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This m e the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.

Form 2.3-4 Written Examination Quality Checklist Facility: Cooper Date of Exam: 6/20/2024 Exam Level: RO IZI Item Description

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility. Each question includes a technical reference.

2.

a. All questions reference NRG knowledge and abilities (KIAs) requirements.

b. Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

c. All questions include an explanation of the correct answer explanation and a distractor analysis.

3.

Senior reactor operator (SRO) questions test at the SRO license level.

4.

The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four reactor operator (RO) or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRG licensing exams, including full (100-question) retake examinations, consult the NRG Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ooerator licensinq proqram office.)

5.

Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate: _ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed. _ The audit exam was completed before the license exam was started. 2-The examinations were developed independently. _ The licensee certifies that there is no duplication. Other (explain):

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, at least 10% new (at the comprehension/analysis level), and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution > Bank 16 / 8 Modified 21 / 44

7.

Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO exam and at least 13 of the questions on the SRO-only portion of the exam Memory are written at the comprehension/analysis level; enter the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution > 33/7 New 63/ 48 C/A 42 / 18

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.

9.

Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the KIA statements' assigned tier; deviations are justified.

10. Question psychometric quality and format meet the instructions and guidelines in ES-4.2.

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

SRO IZI (Y)es I (N)o a b* c# y N/A y y N/A y y N/A y y N/A y y N/A Y y N/A Y y N/A Y y N/A Y y N/A Y y N/A Y y N/A y ~~ Date

a.

Author _ J_o_hn_K_irk_la_n _ _cj_____ ~~---------------~-/ 7_/_z_4-_

b.

Facility Reviewer(*) N/A ~ ,A.

c.

NRG Reviewer(#) Chris Harrinoton A {1/~ ~_;J' 1._~ --?s- ~ / 4 t NRG Chief Examiner ---'J""'o'"'"h""n'""'K""'i"""rk=la=n=d'--,,-/C// --+- v\\..----A----+--~ --+----i, /.___ ~ ""'.,,,,"'----,,/7 '-,,L-_ _ _ -;;r;r;;: NRG Regional Supervisor Heather.,~,( _/'.,.,_-:Ud..Y'"N./4.,L,a,£J/4J 'f:/a..t/#

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for N~

eveloped tem F - r I

1. An independent NRG reviewer performs step.s-+rrec5fumn c. This mat,t1e the NRG Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the written examination under review.

Form 2.3-2 Operating Test Quality Checklist Facility: Coooer Date of Examination: 6/10/2024 OoeratinQ Test Number: 2024-06 General Criteria (Y)es / (No a b* c#

a.

The operating test meets the criteria on the associated test outline y NIA y

b.

There are enough test items so that test items will not be repeated on more than 1 day of y N/A y the operating test. C. The operating test does not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). y N/A y

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is y N/A y minimized.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-y N/A y competent applicants at the designated license level. Walkthrough Criteria

a.

Each job performance measure (JPM) includes the following, as applicable: y N/A y . task standard . initial conditions . initiating cues . references and tools, including associated procedures . reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if the facility licensee deems it to be time critical . alternate path JPMs are labeled as "alternate path" . operationally important specific performance criteria that include the following: detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the JPM task standard identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steos, if aaalicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved JPM outlines (Forms 3.2-1 and 3.2-2) y N/A y have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms. Simulator Scenario Set Criteria for Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be y N/A y out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. y NIA y

3.

Each event description consists of the following: y NIA y the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by s~ift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES (continued)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

5.

The sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to observe and evaluate applicant performance.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4.

10. Scenarios (as grouped) allow each applicant to be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients, events, and evolutions specified on the version of Form 3.4-1 submitted with the scenario set.

11. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when possible.

12. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

TARGET QUANTITATIVE ATTRIBUTES per Scenario (See ES-3.4)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

Malfunctions after emergency operating procedure (EOP) entry (1-2) Abnormal events (2-4) Major transients (1-2) EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (~ 1 per scenario set; set is the entire set of scenarios prepared for the scheduled exam) Preidentified critical tasks (~ 2) Actual Attributes by Scenario No. 1 / 2 / 3 2/3/3 4/4/4 1 / 1 / 1 3/3/2 1 / 1 / 1 3/4/2

a.

Author Printe~~(9!'C_j / John Kirkland / vf.../4-I

b.

Facility Reviewer(*) N/A u (Y)es / (N)o a b* c# y NIA y y N/A y y N/A y y NIA y y NIA y y NIA y y N/A y y NIA y y N/A y (Y)es / (N)o a b* c# y NIA y y N/A y y NIA y y NIA y y N/A y y N/A y C. NRC Reviewer (#) Nicholas Hernandez I N~ ~ May 24, 2024 John Kirkland~ ~~ /) /J S-/2,4 / 2 4-NRC Chief Examiner NRC Supervisor I / / I

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developetl tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column c. This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the operating test under review.

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule From 06/01/2024 to 06/22/2024 Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 By Date

1. Candidates Exam Start Exam End Site Docket #

Insp Rpt Cac # RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiner 6/9/2024 6/15/2024 Cooper 05000298-1 2024301 000500 4 0 4 2 FB-OR-INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ADMINISTRATI ON (EXAD) NFF

Kirkland, John Kirkland, John; Hernandez, Nick; Murphy, Kevin; You, David Prepared on 6/25/2024 3:00:49 PM Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV Exam Author: ALL Orgs: ALL Sites: CNS

IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Region/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 4 4 2 0 10 Region/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 4 4 4 2 0 10 Exam Date/Site Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 6/9/2024 4 4 2 0 10 Exam Date/Docket Summary RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 6/9/2024 4 4 2 0 10 Prepared on 6/25/2024 3:00:49 PM Activity Codes: EXAD, NEXAD, NOV, OV Exam Author: ALL Orgs: ALL Sites: CNS

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: Cooper Nuclear Station Date of Exam: 6/2024 Operating Test No.: CN-2024-06 A P P L I C A N T E V E N T T Y P E Scenarios 1 2 3 Spare 4 T O T A L M I N I M U M(*) POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S R O A T C B O P S R O A T C B O P S R O A T C B O P S R O A T C B O P R I U RO1 SRO-I SRO-U RX 1 0 1 1 1 0 NOR 0 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 5 3 8 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 2 2 4 1 1 0 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 RO SRO-I1 SRO-U RX 1 1 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 7 3 10 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 0 3 3 1 1 0 TS 3 0 3 0 2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U1 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 5 5 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 0 0 1 1 0 TS 2 2 0 2 2 RO SRO-I4 SRO-U RX 1 1 2 1 1 0 NOR 0 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 5 5 10 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 2 0 2 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 0 2 2 RO3 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 2 3 5 1 1 0 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2

Form 3.4-1 Events and Evolutions Checklist Facility: Cooper Nuclear Station Date of Exam: 6/2024 Operating Test No.: CN-2024-06 A P P L I C A N T E V E N T T Y P E Scenarios 1 2 3 Spare 4 T O T A L M I N I M U M(*) POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION S R O A T C B O P S R O A T C B O P S R O A T C B O P S R O A T C B O P R I U RO SRO-I3 SRO-U RX 1 0 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 7 3 10 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 0 2 2 1 1 0 TS 3 0 3 0 2 2 RO4 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 0 1 1 1 1 I/C 3 3 6 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 2 3 5 1 1 0 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 RO SRO-I2 SRO-U RX 0 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 I/C 3 5 8 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 2 0 2 1 1 0 TS 0 2 2 0 2 2 RO2 SRO-I SRO-U RX 1 0 1 1 1 0 NOR 0 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 5 3 8 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 2 2 4 1 1 0 TS 0 0 0 0 2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U2 RX 1 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 1 I/C 7 7 4 4 2 MAJ 1 1 2 2 1 Man. Ctlr 0 0 1 1 0 TS 3 3 0 2 2

Form 3.4-1 Instructions for the Events and Evolutions Checklist

1.

Mark the applicant license level for each simulator operating test number.

2.

For the set of scenario columns, fill in the associated event number from Form 3.3-1, Scenario Outline, to show the specific event types being used for the applicant while in the assigned crew position for that scenario.

• Minimums are subject to the instructions in Section C.2, License Level Criteria.

KEY: RX = Reactivity Manipulation; NOR = Normal Evolution; I/C = Instrument/Component Failure; MAJ = Major Transient; Man. Ctrl = Manual Control of Automatic Function; TS = Technical Specification Evaluation; RO = Reactor Operator; SRO-I or I = Instant Senior Reactor Operator; SRO-U or U = Upgrade Senior Reactor Operator; SRO = Senior Reactor Operator; ATC = At the Controls; and BOP = Balance of Plan

Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement (CNS IL T Class 22-01/ NRC Exam 24-06) (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 6/10/24 and 6/18/2024 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week( s) of 6/10/24 and 6/18/2024. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Signature (1) Date Signature (2) Date Note

1.

Clyde Edgington NRC Exam Speciallst 7/25/2023

2.

Jason Ostendorf NRC Exam Specialist

3.

Andrew Vaughn Simulator & Training 7/31/2023 Support Superintend

4.

Jason Reynolds Simulator Operations 7/26/2023 Specialist

5.

Joel Hudson Simulator Maintenance 7/31/2023 Specialist

6.

Skyler Brandt Simulator Software 4t-Specialist

7.

Deanna Beatty Administrative Assistant I 7/26/2023

8.

Joseph Milligan NRC Exam Developer 7/26/2023 .f-

9.

Jessica Manning Senior Systems Analyst 7/25/2023

10. 6ri'& /\\-Ve'Ros i~

Sl<.o J;F NOTES: ~ "f. -i I y'lJ i ", ka./ (J o...~ °"7 +o f, t I eKei\\.V\\I\\ ~,e.c.lA.r 1,- "'j ~ f-. f-rior

e.i'r11, I f\\ q_-ft Oil

1. See ~

• .fY\\°' \\ \\

Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement (CNS ILT Class 22-01/ NRC Exam 24-06) (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 6/10/24 and 6/18/2024 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 6/10/24 and 6/18/2024. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct. evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Date Signature (2} Date Note

11. Rob,- *t J J

\\. ~-* t_;r ~. c () -- f_...

12.

..-,clc t.. -l<e.i-; ~=

13.

ft/_;_,'< fi/td. 8f<D

14.

17.

18.

19.

20.

Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement (CNS IL T Class 22-01/ NRC Exam 24-06) (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 6/10/24 and 6/18/2024 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week( s) of 6/10/24 and 6/18/2024. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Signature (1) Date Signature (2) Date Note 21. Colt Z.u,+nv R. 0 2-21-2.lf {::t

22.

.Nie.I.. JGUSc"' I< 0

i I ~2/:111

-tr

23. 14J ID 5Ro 3/4/2'(

~,~,

24.

i-u..-_:::. R,--o ff 3 -lPZ

25.

/J2 5RD

26.

{l.O

27.

-ztJ-7'(

28.

s;e.o 3 7.b/J..1./ if

29.

Ro /STE 't I I /? 14='

30.

oCt~/1-(lo ~ '-f /ti/z '-( ~ NOTES: cJkJeJ l See - ~*

Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement (CNS ILT Class 22-01/ NRC Exam 24-06) (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 6/10/24 and 6/18/2024 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week( s) of 66/10/24 and 6/18/2024. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Signature (1) Date Signature (2) Date Note

31.

S/ro

32.

33.

s,e.o

34.

{ 0

35.

tt

38.

Z7 /?IL..//; NOTES-{f see

Form 1.3-1 Examination Security Agreement (CNS IL T Class 22-01/ NRC Exam 24-06) (1) Preexamination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week( s) of 6/10/24 and 6/1 8/2024 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until the completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations, an enforcement action by the NRC against me or the facility licensee, or both. I will immediately report to facility licensee management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised. (2) Postexamination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 6/1 0/24 and 6/18/2024. From the date that I entered into this examination security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below or authorized by the NRC. Print Name Job Title Signature (1) Date Signature (2) Date Note 41.

42.

43.

44.

45.

e,/z.o/z.<-t

46.

f;t &;, 20 24 lf

50.

NOTES: see-efv1cc...,

Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] From: Sent: To:

Subject:

Tracking: Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] Wednesday, June 19, 2024 10:08 AM Edgington, Clyde A.; Ostendorf, Jason D.; Reynolds, Jason M.; Hudson, Joel R.; Brandt, Skyler A.; Beatty, Deanna L.; Manning, Jessica A.; DeRosier, Brian A.; Block, Alex T.; Block, Robert J.; Egger, Nicholas J. [Nick]; Harrington, Walter R.; Burkhart, Christopher J:(Constellation Nuclear); Zentner, Cole T.; Janssen, Nick C.; Rakowski, David A.; Hicks, David L.; Murphy, Brian P.; Gage, Joshua J.; Carpenter, Christopher M.; Ehlers, Joshua J.; Parker, Jacob T.; Kawa, Joseph M.; Smith, Gregory L.; Hoff, Steven D.; Tietz, Lenny L.; Palmer, Maurice C.; Beger, Nathan L.; Mayer, Michael L.; Joe, Anthony P.; Klassen, Lawrence R.; Askins, Andrew J.; Dickerson, William B.; Weiss, Jamie R.; Youngquist, Kody H.; Kouba, Randy L.; Klinger, Woody D.; Behrends, Klinton D.; Mitchell, Lisa R.; Grauerholz, Jacqueline S. [Jacque]; Olberding, Jodie Y.; dadmagnant@aim.com ILT Class 22-01 Examination Security Agreement Signoff Recipient Edgington, Clyde A. Ostendorf, Jason D. Reynolds, Jason M. Hudson, Joel R. Brandt, Skyler A. Beatty, Deanna L. Manning, Jessica A. DeRosier, Brian A. Block, Alex T. Block, Robert J. Egger, Nicholas J. [Nick] Harrington, Walter R. Burkhart, Christopher J:(Constellation Nuclear) Zentner, Cole T. Janssen, Nick C. Rakowski, David A. Hicks, David L. Murphy, Brian P. Gage, Joshua J. Carpenter, Christopher M. Ehlers, Joshua J. Parker, Jacob T. Kawa, Joseph M. Smith, Gregory L. Hoff, Steven D. Tietz, Lenny L. Palmer, Maurice C. Beger, Nathan L. 1

Response

Agree: 6/24/2024 1:18 PM Agree: 6/19/2024 2:23 PM Agree: 6/19/2024 10:36 AM Agree: 7/8/2024 7:44 AM Agree: 6/20/2024 8:29 AM Agree: 6/19/2024 2:31 PM Agree: 6/19/2024 10:14 AM Agree: 6/19/2024 10:28 AM Agree: 6/19/2024 4:01 PM A~ree: 6/21/2024 6:40 PM Agree: 6/21/2024 12:51 PM Agree: 6/19/202~/!: 0 AM .:;ee °"' dvz e.l efVlq; I Agree: 6/19/2024 9:57 PM 5ee °'i./--a.cl.aJ e~,-{ Agree: 6/20/2024 5:21 AM Agree: 6/20/2024 5:46 AM Agree: 6/19/2024 10:13 AM Agree: 6/21/2024 5:44 PM Agree: 6/19/2024 12:21 PM Agree: 6/19/2024 11 :OS AM Agree: 6/19/2024 8:25 PM Agree: 6/20/2024 2:12 PM Agree: 6/19/2024 10:11 AM Agree: 6/19/2024 10:40 AM Agree: 6/20/2024 7:22 AM Agree: 6/19/202410:11 AM

Teammates, Recipient Mayer, Michael L. Joe, Anthony P. Klassen, Lawrence R. Askins, Andrew J. Dickerson, William B. Weiss, Jamie R. Youngquist, Kody H. Kouba, Randy L. Klinger, Woody D. Behrends, Klinton D. Mitchell, Lisa R. Grauerholz, Jacqueline 5. [Jacque] Olberding, Jodie Y. dadmagnant@aim.com

Response

Agree: 6/21/2024 5:42 PM Agree: 6/ 22/ 2024 9:11 AM Agree: 6/ 19/2024 10:13 AM Agree: 6/19/2024 11 :11 AM Agree: 7/8/2024 11 :53 AM Agree: 6/19/202411:47 AM Agree: 6/20/2024 10:26 AM Ag!t6/19/2024 10:39 AM I ~ (.r.)~ /.3-- Agr~ f<19/2024 11 :37 AM ~ vb~) I. 3-I Agree: 6/19/ 2024 10:10 AM G/~ /~r::; e/V\\~:, The administration ofthe Initial License Class 22-01 NRC Examination was completed on Tuesday, June 18, 2024. ATTENTION -Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. The NRC Examination team is currently compiling documentation to support our post-examination submittal to the NRC next week. The examination security agreement associated with ILT Class 22-01 NRC Exam is a required document for submittal to the NRC. You entered into an Examination Security Agreement in accordance with NUREG 1021-Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, and it is time to complete this by adding your post-examination acknowledgement to NUREG 1021 Form 1.3-1. Instead of visiting the NRC Examination Room, you can complete this obligation by responding to this email by voting "Agree" or "Disagree". Please vote "Agree" or "Disagree" by clicking "Vote" in the "Respond" group above. The "Agree" option confirms your acknowledgement to the following statement: "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weeks of June 10th and June 18th 2024. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted on the examination security agreement and authorized by the NRC." Please provide your response back to me. I appreciate your prompt attention. 2

You may return your Exam Security badge to the Exam room or my office. Thank you! Andrew Vaughn Simulator & Training Support Superintendent Cooper Nuclear Station (Brownville) N Nebraska Public Pnwer Dislricl W: 402-825-5345 M: 402-414-2544 72676 648A Avenue. PO Box 98 Brownville, NE 68321-0098 3

Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] From: Sent: To:

Subject:

Janssen, Nick C. Monday, June 24, 2024 6:53 AM Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] Agree: ILT Class 22-01 Examination Security Agreement Signoff 1

Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] From: Sent: To:

Subject:

Andy, I agree.

Bob Magnant Bob <dadmagnant@aim.com> Wednesday, June 19, 2024 1:43 PM Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] Re: ILT Class 22-01 Examination Security Agreement Signoff On Wednesday, June 19, 2024 at 11 :08:03 AM EDT, Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] <alvaugh@nppd.com> wrote: Teammates, The administration of the Initial License Class 22-01 NRC Examination was completed on Tuesday, June 18, 2024. ATTENTION - Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. The NRC Examination team is currently compiling documentation to support our post-examination submittal to the NRC next week. The examination security agreement associated with IL T Class 22-01 NRC Exam is a required document for submittal to the NRC. You entered into an Examination Security Agreement in accordance with NU REG 1021 - Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, and it is time to complete this by adding your post-examination acknowledgement to NU REG 1021 Form 1.3-1. Instead of visiting the NRC Examination Room, you can complete this obligation by responding to this email by voting "Agree" or "Disagree". Please vote "Agree" or "Disagree" by clicking "Vote" in the "Respond" group above. 1

The "Agree" option confirms your acknowledgement to the following statement: "To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the weeks of June 10th and June 18th 2024. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted on the examination security agreement and authorized by the NRG." Please provide your response back to me. I appreciate your prompt attention. You may return your Exam Security badge to the Exam room or my office. Thank you! Andrew Vaughn Simulator & Training Support Superintendent Cooper Nuclear Station (Brownville) I W : 402-825-5345 M: 402-414-2544 Nebraska Public Power Distrkl 72676 648A Avenue, PO Box 98 .~lu,,:,, :f.*,rwl.,n :-n,,o >o Brownville, NE 68321-0098 2

Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] From: Sent: To:

Subject:

Burkhart, Christopher J:(Constellation Nuclear) < Christopher. Burkhart@constellation.com > Wednesday, June 19, 2024 12:15 PM Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] RE: [EXTERNAL]ILT Class 22-01 Examination Security Agreement Signoff I agree. Please sign me off of exam security. From: Vaughn, Andrew L. [Andy] <alvaugh@nppd.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 10:08 AM To: Edgington, Clyde A.<caedgin@nppd.com>; Ostendorf, Jason D.<jdosten@nppd.com>; Reynolds, Jason M. <jmreyno@nppd.com>; Hudson, Joel R.<jrhudso@nppd.com>; Brandt, Skyler A.<sabrand@nppd.com>; Beatty, Deanna L. <dlbeatt@nppd.com>; Manning, Jessica A.<jamanni@nppd.com>; DeRosier, Brian A.<baderos@nppd.com>; Block, Alex T.<atblock@nppd.com>; Block, Robert J.<rjblock@nppd.com>; Egger, Nicholas J. [Nick] <njegger@nppd.com>; Harrington, Walter R. <wrharri@nppd.com>; Burkhart, Christopher J:(Constellation Nuclear) <Christopher.Burkhart@constellation.com>; Zentner, Cole T.<ctzentn@nppd.com>; Janssen, Nick C. <ncjanss@nppd.com>; Rakowski, David A.<darakow@nppd.com>; Hicks, David L. <dlhicks@nppd.com>; Murphy, Brian P. <bpmurph@nppd.com>; Gage, Joshua J. <jjgage@nppd.com>; Carpenter, Christopher M.<cmcarpe@nppd.com>; Ehlers, Joshua J.<jjehler@nppd.com>; Parker, Jacob T.<jtparke@nppd.com>; Kawa, Joseph M.<jmkawa@nppd.com>; Smith, Gregory L. <glsmith@nppd.com>; Hoff, Steven D.<sdhoff@nppd.com>; Tietz, Lenny L. <lltietz@nppd.com>; Palmer, Maurice C. <mcpalme@nppd.com>; Beger, Nathan L. <nlbeger@nppd.com>; Mayer, Michael L. <mlmayer@nppd.com>; Joe, Anthony P.<apjoe@nppd.com>; Klassen, Lawrence R.<lrklass@nppd.com>; Askins, Andrew J.<ajaskin@nppd.com>; Dickerson, William B.<wbdicke@nppd.com>; Weiss, Jamie R.<jrweiss@nppd.com>; Youngquist, Kody H. <khyoung@nppd.com>; Kouba, Randy L. <rlkouba@nppd.com>; Klinger, Woody D. <wdkling@nppd.com>; Behrends, Klinton D.<kdbehre@nppd.com>; Mitchell, Lisa R.<lrmitch@nppd.com>; Grauerholz, Jacqueline S. [Jacque] <jsgraue@nppd.com>; Olberding, Jodie Y.<jyolber@nppd.com>; dadmagnant@aim.com

Subject:

[EXTERNAL]ILT Class 22-01 Examination Security Agreement Signoff EXTERNAL MAIL. Do not click links or open attachments from unknown senders or unexpected Email. Teammates, The administration of the Initial License Class 22-01 NRC Examination was completed on Tuesday, June 18, 2024. 1

ATTENTION -Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. The NRC Examination team is currently compiling documentation to support our post-examination submittal to the NRC next week. The examination security agreement associated with ILT Class 22-01 NRC Exam is a required document for submittal to the NRC. You entered into an Examination Security Agreement in accordance with NUREG 1021-Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors, and it is time to complete this by adding your post-examination acknowledgement to NU REG 1021 Form 1.3-1. Instead of visiting the NRC Examination Room, you can complete this obligation by responding to this email by voting "Agree" or "Disagree". Please vote "Agree" or "Disagree" by clicking "Vote" in the "Respond" group above. The "Agree" option confirms your acknowledgement to the following statement: To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the weeks of June 10th and June 18th 2024. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted on the examination security agreement and authorized by the NRC. 11 Please provide your response back to me. I appreciate your prompt attention. You may return your Exam Security badge to the Exam room or my office. Thank you! Andrew Vaughn SrmL:lator,& TrainrnQ Suppor*t Super*intendent Cooper Nuclear Station (Brownville) Nebraska Public Power Dislrkl \\,v: 402-325-5345 M: 402-414-2544 72676 648,A.,A:*./enue, PO Box 98 Bro\\~illVi lle. 1'~E 6 -3321 -0098 This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Constellation Energy Corporation or its affiliates ("Constellation"). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. Constellation policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. Constellation will not accept any liability in respect of such communications. -CEGIP 2}}