ML13170A276

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (98) of Merideth Genin Opposing Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 Extension of Public Comment Period
ML13170A276
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/30/2013
From: Genin M
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
NRC-2013-0063, 78FR26662 00098
Download: ML13170A276 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES BRANCH USNTC PUBLIC SUBMISSION 1 JUN I I 08 Docket: NRC-2013-0063 REC IVED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 3;Period As of: June 11, 2013 Received:

May 30, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85mg-g2t7 Comments Due: June 03, 2013 Submission Type: Web Extension of Public Comment Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-0087 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 Submitter Information c~3 Name: Merideth Genin Address: 543 East 6th Street New York, NY, 10009-6636 Submitter's Representative:

Carolyn Maloney Organization:

None Government Agency Type: Local General Comment Along with millions of others in NYC, I'm downwind of Indian Point. Entergy has been beyond negligent.

Fish kills in the Hudson are common and constant because our river is used to dump their cooling water. However, I write to you about Entergy's desire for an exemption to necessary and logical fire safety.The NRC should deny the exemption and require Entergy to comply with the regulations, which were written to protect the plant and the public from the very real risk of a fire that could lead to a meltdown at Indian Point.The NRC failed to do an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) of the risks and impacts of granting the exemption, including looking at alternatives, such as replacing the insulation.

At a minimum the NRC must conduct a full EIS, look at all alternatives and allow time for public comment.The NRC should hold a public hearing in the vicinity of Indian Point to fully explain its exemption process, and take public input on Entergy's failure to comply with fire safety regulations that were established over 20 years ago.Thank you for considering my opinion, and I wish you and yours health and peace.SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentst Add= D. Pickett (dvpl) 06/11/2013