ML13003A037

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Report No. MPR-3812, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-233 Through Page C-309
ML13003A037
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/16/2012
From: Schlaseman C S
MPR Associates
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3812, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A037 (77)
v • d • e


Text

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT3-2-3-61 Equip. Class 1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Vessel Water Level Transmitter Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R3-40 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N YX ND UD N/AD1 YX(NO UD N/AD)X ND UL N/AD YO ND U[] N/AaI XR(ND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r2nrr;-nnnds-n(,ý Nn -RRq-19-17.A C-233 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LT3-2-3-61 Equip. Class" 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Vessel Water Level Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?If NEI UIJ- N/AEl Y)X NO UO N/AEl Yk NEI UOI N/AI-NEUI UH Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJZNEI ULI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date:. 'r/>A 1:74 1 qjf'7IZOt?7

-< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnndInr Non" RR-19-17.C-234

-~0 0 z 0 C 0 I m 30 CD C!O 6 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: 0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. LT-9123A Equip. Class'2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Torus Water Level Transmitter Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-11 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI Nj~"1 NEI UL] N/AD Ix NEI UD N/Ar]Y)( NE U] N/AD YE! NEI UD N/A1R Y"ND UVD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 ('nrrP-.nnnriPnr.-.

Nn

  • R-19-171 C-236 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. LT-9123A Equip. Class1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Torus Water Level Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NO U" N/AE Y4N- U' N/AO YX NEI UO N/Afl YX NO UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y<NEI U0 adversely affect the safety. functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: / 7--/7 -'Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnndInrA Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-237

-g 0 S'Do-3 0 0 z ~0'0 clO 4J~:1.c, m.0 CD I of 2 Status-__

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M03-10-013C Equip. Class1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump Torus Suction Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YUINoýY5ZNEI UL N/AL Yd-NE UL N/AL Yp' NEI UD N/AL YE- NEI UE- N/AYý, NEI UL 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPnnn1Pnr-.

Nn -RP-RA9-171 C-239 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M03-10-013C Equip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump Torus Suction Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YEfND[ U[] N/Al]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YWNE] UD N/Al]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZN" Ul N/Al]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Vg-N-] UE]of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ye NE-] UL-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

At t /Evaluated by: Date: '//(( 1-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnnrInr.I Nn

  • RR-1T-17.1 C-240

~ol a- 0D 3 j CA m-3 CD C)0 Sheet 1 of 2 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M03-10-015*- " Equip. Classa 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Descriptjon' RHR Pump Shutdown Cooling Suction Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to documentthe results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the foblowing questions may be used- to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations' is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NoUEI N/A[]YENE! UO N/A[l)o NE] UE- N/AO YEI NEI ULJ N/A Y NEI UF1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP-qnnndPnrý-

Nn ' RRA 9-1-71 C-242 Sheet 2 of 2 C Equipment ID No. M03-10-015A-Equip. Class" 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump Shutdown Cooling Suction Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearb equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block wqlls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seisnp interactionoeffects?

4h4OA by ' IC;f1!5 Y ,eo~-wje,^N ND U- N/AD Yr ND UD N/AD AYEI UEY N/AD' Y4,ND UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ. ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,¢ 17 Evaluted by: Date://Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPznnneIPnr'.

Nn

  • R5R--1I73<C-4>C-243 Equipment ID: MO-3-10-015C Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnrPnrn.

Nn' RR-19-171 C-244 Equipment ID: MO-3-10-015C Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-1-1-TA C-245 Sheet 1 of 2 StatusUN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M03-10-89AC---

Equip. Class" 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR HX HPSW Outlet Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 116 Room, Area -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO Y NEI Y NO Y NEI Ull N/AU ULD N/AO Ull N/AU YONEI UO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<KC-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrignnnrhinr.P Nn -RR-19-171 C-246 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M03-10-892 C. Equip. Class" 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR HXHPSW Outlet Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YV NEI UE N/AU YX NO UDI N/AU YRNU UD N/AU YX NE UDI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could : NE U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/A A-, Evaluated b'Date: 41 _I t~ //-'Z--< C-4 >ýPeach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Cnrrm..nnnrIlnr.P-Nn " R-19-1773 C-247 Equipment ID: MO-3-10-089C Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP-nnnd~nr.

Nn* R5q-19-177A C-248 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /'tc g -o-3A A Equip. Class'2 Vf --orf Oaf-j'a__0(Equipment Description OA /IT 7 A SL LO.eC C ,4 T6" Location:

Bldg. 5 creýhl'cSeFloorEl.

/1(o Room, Area 5/.-14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?.Se(- Cotdt #4I 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

))oNEI X NEI YN U-1 N/AD-U[- N/AD-]UI- N/A[-'Y& N[- U[-D N/ADI Y]( NO UD-1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

ý<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP.ýnnnHPnr.P Nn

  • R.0-19-17.

C-249 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. fr1O' o" 0 Equip. Class1 2 C0A" do 4 iw0 oaW Vol', Equipment Description -U 1 4 "A ' sloce Gca Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

-N 0 Clon' 4o 1 YX NEI U- N/A[J 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y)ý N[-] U-1 N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI U- N/AC Y NEI UI-I Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)K N-I Ur adversely affect the safety fu ctions of the equipment?

' 4.COrOiaCC

ýýVlepy Z r ajiA -urIcLnoj bo ~u~J Occ~4'eu Comments (Aditi nal sages may be added as necessary)

TO y Ovll. o ,e'i4.o- .4t-Io .E V ~ U -r of',o 'uccI F v u Evaluated by: Date: Me 20 Z< C-4 )Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 , CnrrFnnnHP~nrA-Nn

  • RR-19-17A C-250

-U 0 2 3 z 0 23 -0:3 c~E m-o C CD-4.B 0 CJ~CJ~0 C,, C,, C,,

2-0-D A oa* 0 S U)m 30 CD*0 C!O.0 C0 Sheet I of 2 Status: O N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)MO-3 -3.-3T0o3 V/IA,/?-Equipment ID No. -M0-32--9 6 t4quip. Class 1 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSW Return Valve to ECT Location:

Bldg. Diesel Generator Floor El. 121 Room, Area D/G-2 Building Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.ý Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?,,- .5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO- N[YE)NEI UO YW.NO UEJ YM NO UEI N/Ad YOl NEI UQ N/AJI Yo NOU[:]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Tnrr..qnnnttP.nr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-253 Sheet 2 of 2 MO-3-37-3BO 3 S Equipment ID No. M32393Equip.

Class" 2 (08 a' Motor Operated Valves, Equipment Description HPSW Return Valve to ECT Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

C4V-aW-\-

CI-b t &O--Wb i6e- o y- vn&cpscn.r'

\A-vr.oeV 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJA NEI U- N/AOlNEI- UO- N/All Yfi NO UD N/AD)R ND UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NEI UO]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:./I Y., 0-'5 1 b& -e-Date: g/2X.1 Z.'V I >- ' -< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3.nrrfnnndFnrf Nn -RR-19-17.1 C-254

-, o* 0 m CO CD)00 CA)wA Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. M03-48-3804B Equip. Class 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSWBay Inlet Inner Valve Location:

Bldg. Emergenc Floor El. 114 Room, Area ECT-1 Cooling Towers ( iJw -pit)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?L ~-t Lo A -en .3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO N[YJ NE ULI N/AE NE UE N/AO YV NEI UD N/AE YEI NE UE N/A YANEUO 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn

  • RR-19-17.C-256 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. M03-48-3804B Equip. Class" 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description HPSW Bay Inlet Inner Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No 1,af- /6Lf4 Y)93 NO UL N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, ND U-I N/A--and masonry. block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

.2~~vo ese ea &c4'u Ilo /vir AioerssAJ e 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yj ND U0 N/AD Y> NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 0 Date: /]r/5 I//-'-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrp-nnndpnr'.p Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-257 2 OCD*ý 0 3~40-3 C/=4 m.0 CDo CA)0,L co Equipment ID: M03-48-3804B Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP-qnnnrIdnn.p Nn
  • RR-19-17A C-259 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:6 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. eV3 0-"36"7' Equip IlIss2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RH]R Pump ," Valve 4 Location:

Bldg. Reactor Po Floor El. 91 Room, Area R3-5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YOI YgNo Y4,ND Y-No UI- N/AEI UEI N/A-U- N/A--YEJ NEIUU N/A2 YftNE- UU 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrP.ýnnndPnnr, Nn* RR-19-173 C-260 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. & Equip. Class" 2 (08a) Motor Operated Valves Equipment Description RHR Pump virhorP Cpmtrp!Valvei" _.I.? .-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets fre from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YdNEI U[] N/Al]YI-Nl U[-] N/Al]YA N UOl N/Au)gNE3 Ul]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NOi UI-1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: 9 1 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (`.nrrNnnnrinr.P Nn

  • RR-19-17.1

< C-4 >)C-261 Equipment ID: MO-3-10-013A Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rTnrrA.qnnndc1nr.

Nn" RR-19-17.C-262 Equipment ID: MO-3-10-013A Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 flnrrAnnndPnr.A Nn RR-17-17.1 C-263 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. -Equip. Class'2 (10) Air Handlers D- 3-qo 4-3oz-3-03 tAo Equipment Description HPSWPump Room A Loop Supply Damper Location:

Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E Nb of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YVNE UEI N/A[]3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YX NE U[J N/AE-oxidation?

4. Is the anchor ge free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YNED UE N/AU]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE NEI UE N/AR (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YX NEI UEI potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter.the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPqnnndPnr-p Nn

  • P.R-19-171 C-264 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. -02.,-,, Equip. Class1 2 (00) Air Handlers PoP-3.-OHW-3o2.-3-o3 MZ'/ Z Equipment Description HPSW Pump Room A Loop Suppyl Damper Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?,Mo J ar 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility, to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UrI N/AU YX NO UO N/AU YWNI- UEI N/AE]YXJ" NO. U]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UFU adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary 1 TPE11 I 4rve ,"Irvt P EE *T'6 LoM61 050 rqove : v41Dl~~Evaluated by:.Evaluated by:. Date: Date: Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3`nrrP-nnndHnr.P.

Nn

  • RR-1 9-171 C-265

-w z FT 0 W 0 r~ 0 L cn m.0 0 0 CIO 0 s3 >C.c)m 30 CD 0 CD, C!, C,).0 Sheet I of 2N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)PO-D -3_ -10 H 3ozz3_o -04. ..Equipment ID No.qi7isl ( Ra nd N"s ktcs Equipment Description HP5W P6M6 Rt Logp ,Fxkoy( Location:

Bldg.Pu mg 54ufo Floor El. I 'I Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE! N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YX NE U-1 N/AC-~jfNEI UE] N/AC1 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? N[" UE! N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-] NE! U1 N/A%(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI UD'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPnnndPncr.

Nn* RR-19-173 C-268 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.-- Equip. Class'2 ( A, .A~r Ha 4 1 Equipment Description 4 Pump Roory, 6 LCOx 1Marl Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJX NEI UE- N/Al YX ND UD N/AD Y; ND UD N/AD V9 ND UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yq ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).JPEEE:supper-r04ed 4r0 pecvk 4+V enclo->v(e roo 0 n4fJ 4 2 Oh1? vowil4 :,ý01fd& O'L cova,1k 041- C04'. dda'4 I?Mhid Evaluated by: Date: C:: E/31/ 2317-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrm'nnndnr.A.

Nn

  • R-1 9-1 7T C-269 coa jý 0~3 ..* 0 C.)c -m 30 CD CDO-rn.

Sheet 1 of 2 StatuSo N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. P13-6-90A Equip. Class" (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Descriptiohi Reactor Wide Range Pressure Indicator Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if-the item is one of the .50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEINR YI4 NEI UEJ N/AD YK NEI U-] N/AD-YK NEI U[] N/AD YEO NEI UFJ N/As'YNEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >ýPeach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r~nrrs-nnnr1Pn.nP Kin

  • RR-19-171" C-271 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. PB3-6-90A Equip. Class'2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Reactor Wide Range Pressure Indicator Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y~d NE UD N/AD]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YOi N] Ul N/A]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

A40t ce,(1 (,-,s,, ,.,.s.e 6 -5// -, e, 4, C'.6-(o0 C t, ,... , .. 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YK. NE UD N/All YPR'NO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)J NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: /O//l /2,.-i~n<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPAnnnds-nr.P Nn RR-19-171 C-272 (D a*ý 0 03 m-3 CD 30 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:?)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. JPt3-2-3-404B Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Ml#)Equipment Description Reactor Pressure!DZ lhdl/GaI ctns iiorde" 10o./3/11.

Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE-I Y1 NEI UI] N/AE!Y[A NEI U] N/AL-Y1 NEI Ur- N/AO YEI NEI UE! N/A19 YW NEI Ul 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

KC-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (.nrrP.,nnndHnr.

Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-274 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. -PR3-2-3-404B Equip. Class" (20) Control Panels & Cabinets EIwo Equipment Description Reactor Pressure!.or.¢tvt#

C-,m tu,-de," ýez3l/jz_Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YP NO] ULi N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y1 NO UD N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?6,--1,06-1 Ct4ld A be /oaA4/. 5,-e £74- o/q',bS/9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YK1 ND UD N/AD Yp NEI U-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YXI ND UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: /0 ' /3.W/9 /9 a< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrmnnnrIi~nrn Nn

  • RR-19-173 C-275 OD 0. 3* 0 c -m 30 CD-.6 C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: (j) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 4X-R.5805-Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Containment Pressure/

.3,/ -Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area. T3-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Wilkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?'

YO YK NEI UD N/AD Yo NEI U- N/Al Y[A. NE U[] N/A'YE NO U- N/AO Yt NEI U0 L 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3.nrrPznnnHPnrP.

Nn RR-1 9-173 C-277 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. -PR5'8O5 Equip. Class" (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Containment Pressure t/o/.-.?.V. ,G/3,/t-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y9 NI- UFI N/AQ.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YM NOI U' N/A[and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

~ -,o4~/ ~4 r~d r'k ~' 0~, /d -9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y[ NOI UO] N/AO YX NEI UO1 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NOI UOi adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: " " Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrv.nnndPnr.P in

  • RR-19-171 Date: /o/' /--10/19 //A<C-4>C-278

-CD.; .)M)* 0 c.:3-m-0 3 OD C5 Qu Sheet 1 of 2 Status:.1)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PS30224-2 Equip. Class" 2 (18) Instruments on Racks /Not on Racks Equipment Description HPSWPump Room B Loop Pressure Switch Location:

Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist.

This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD N VtgND]UD N/AD YXNI- UD N/AD Yý'ND UD N/AD YD NDUD WN/A ND UD Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP-nnndi1nr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-280 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. PS30224-2 Equip. Class1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks /Not on Racks Equipment Description HPSWPump Room B Loop Pressure Switch Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
  • No s'4F 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI UI' N/AONEI UE N/AE YX NEI UE- N/AE-XNEI UE1 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that, could YX NEI U adversely affect.the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).

N/A Evaluated by: vr~R&fl Date: ci:,?17x Y11:1 1291 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 N -RR-19-17.1 C-281 0 z g* C 0 -m.0 C.5.2 (D-4.B-u C', CA)0 N)N, N N, Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PT3-2-3-404A Equip. Class 1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks /Not on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Pressure Transmitter Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R3-40 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item.is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YDINý&YXEND UD N/AD YJAND UD N/AD YX NI UE-1 N/AD YD ND UE" N/AO YI9 ND UD, 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn RR-19-173 C-283 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. PT3-2-3-404A Equip. Class 1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Pressure Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?XýNEI UE- N/Afl YV NEI UI- N/AO Y; NO- U- N/AO YA NEI Ur Other Adverse Conditions S11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV'N"I UE" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-I Evaluated by:.?wk- W4AhA 1ý -xv Date: M-I ý;/X? ý211-11Lh201

<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3.nrrrAnnnr1~nr.

Mn *RR-19-171 C-284 jý 02* 0 CD 0 C.0 C/)m.0 CD:3 C!O 64 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: C2N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PT3-6-53A Equip. Class'2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Wide Range Pressure Transmitter Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R3-40 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEINR Yý(NE UE N/AE YX NEI UE N/AE Y) NE UE N/AE YE NEI UE N/Ad NEI UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

SC-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrA-nnnHPdnr'p Nn RR-1 9-173 C-286 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. PT3-6-53A Equip. Class 1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Reactor Wide Range Pressure Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Tc -" 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Nzo U-' N/AD YXNO UO N/AD NE UO N/Afl YX NEI Uf Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yg NEI U'I adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Gjmh-V x 14-()~A4 Date: _q___/____

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPnnnrIdnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-287

-0 a.-U' 3 0 m cz CP w Sheet I of 2 Status(j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. PT-5 805 Equip. Class 1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Drawell Pressure Transmitter Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 116 Room, Area R3-21 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorane 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- NP of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

NO E UO N/A~~~CA 0, j,'q t-.&4 o,,3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4 NE UO N/A-Yt NEI U0i N/AE YE NEI U[ N/Ag YANE UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 (.nrrP.nnnHPnr.P Nn -RR-19-17.1 C-289 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. PT-5805 Equip. Class 1 2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description Drvwell Pressure Transmitter Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y 'NED UEJ N/A[]-4r' V r4-VVO'V ' 4f.be 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?UI- N/AE 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y NEI UD N/A[l 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YWND3 UL Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YU-NE] UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evalua ated by: A--" Date: *') 5! Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPmnnndfPnr Nn" R5-M-l9-171

< C-4 )0 C-290 D a* 0 vi 0u CA 02 m 30 CD OD C5 CA Sheet 1 of 2 Status: CN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. RV3-23-034 Equip. Class1 2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description HPCI Pump Suction Header Relief Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R3-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NNEI UI N/AE Yt NO U' N/AE YX NI] UO N/AE YO NEI UD N/AX YON NEI uJ 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn

  • RS-19-17l C-292 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. RV3-23-034 Equip. Class 1 2 (07) Fluid (Air/Hyd)

Valves Equipment Description HPCI Pump Suction Header Relief Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YXND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y) ND and masonry block.walls not likely to collapse onto the ejuip ent?69cMM ~ I 6 0 A~ 46 rv1ý, 1 UD N/AD 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX ND UD N/AD YNED UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YA ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/A Evaluated by:.(bAn

_____/"___

91- IJ -2< C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrP.,nnndPnrA.

Nn RR-19-17.1 C-293 Equipment ID: RV3-23B-034 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn* RR-1-171 C-294 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)~33 Equipment ID No. SV3-3-4A-Equip. Class 1 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Arer 3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

M.,/ .--Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one It N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

/,61, OW, e e ,ke.,3 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YONQ UL N/AL MIE io.6 5i~ V +* O eel 4s k ________&I P P I Ae1 f % O- q t ,T 0 t z e V , / 0 )3. Is the anchorage free6f c6rrosion that is more than mild surface UL N/AL oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y,'!,N-I U-' N/A--5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YX NL" UL N/AL-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YA NL UL" potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >0 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrPnnndPnr.P Nn

  • RR-19-171 C-295 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No.

¢" Equip. Class 1 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, 'is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YONE- UU N/AU Y,V-N UO] N/AU Y;ZNEL ULI N/AU YJANE ULI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE.NM UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated I)Y: Date: 2/,,S .b61 /Z Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn ' RR-1 9-17R'< C-4 >C-296

-0c-~0 z 0 CD m 30 CD 60 Sheet 1 of 2 Status.' YN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. SV3-3-3& Equip. Class 1 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Prnu~nm~tit Thp~.rint~-rn

!nvtrnnont Air S'nlannid Valvo JI,.Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area IZ,, ", zL';W Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Y4 NL Y-WNI- UL N/AEl A norjc -0~;4',5va 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YDINE]UI-I N/AL YANE UD N/AL YPEI U- N/AD YAND UL1 2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 flnrrmnnnrP.nr,.

Nn

  • RA-19-171 C-298 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. SV3 BEquip. Class" 2 (08b) Solenoid Operated Valves Equipment Description Instrument Air Solenoid Valve Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?ULI N/AO Yý--N] UEI N/AOl YAN[ UEI N/AEI Ylff-NE] UE Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJP-N[I ULL adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

'1 _, Evalu ated by: Date: z- z 41 102 dJ-< C-4 >)Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 rnrrPAnnndinrP Nn" RR-19-171 C-299

-z 0 C. 0"0 Cn m 30 CD CA)0)

Table C-2. Unit 0 Seismic Walkdown Checklists (SWCs)Anchor AWC-Component Description Configuration AWC-ID Confirmed?

Ux-YY 00B061 Pump Structure MCC E224-P-A N U0-13 00C29B Emergency Protection Relay Board Y U0-6 OAC097 Diesel Generator OAG12 Control U0-2*Panel 0AG012 El Standby Diesel Generator Y U0-2*0AP060 El D/G Fuel Oil Transfer Pump N UO-2 0AP163 Emergency Service Water Booster N U0-1*Pump A 0AT040 El Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Y UO-2*Tank 0AT096 El Diesel Generator Lube Oil Storage N U0-2*Tank 0AV030 Control Room Emerg Vent Supply Fan y U0-8*A 0AV036 Battery Room Exhaust Fan A Y UO-10 0AV064 D/G Building Vent Supply Fan Y UO-9 0BK032 Emergency Cooling Tower Fan B Y UO-3 0BP057 Emergency Service Water Pump B Y U3-3*0BV030 Control Room Emergency Ventilation y UO-8 Supply Fan B 0BV035 Emergency Switchgear Ventilation Y UO-1 0*Exhaust Fan B 0BV036 Battery Room Exhaust Fan B Y UO-1 0*0DE377 E4 Diesel Generator Lube Oil Cooler Y UO-1 1 ODG012 E4 Standby Diesel Generator Y U0-11*ODPO60 E4 D/G Fuel Oil Transfer Pump N U0-11*ODT40 E4 Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Y U0-11*Tank 0DV064 D/G Building Vent Supply Fan Y UO-12 0HT95 E4 Diesel Generator Starting Air Y U0-11*Reservoir AO..33..0241 D ESW Outlet Block Valve from Diesel N U0-l1*Generator E4 Coolers MO-0-33-0498 ESW Return to Discharge Pond N/A UO-1 MO-48-0501A ESW A Inlet to ECT Reservoir N/A U0-4 PO-0-40F-Master for El EDG Building Vent N U0-9*00272-01 Supply Fan Outside Air Damper PO-0-40F-Master for El EDG Building Vent N U0-9*00272-02 Supply Fan Return Air Damper TCV-0-52E-D/G Jacket Coolant 3-Way N/A U0-2*7239A Thermostatic Control Valve TS-0607D E4 D/G Jacket Coolant Temperature N/A UO-1 1 Sensor II Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Correspondence No.: RS-12-173 C-301 She t I of 2 Status: Y6N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. I 22q f- A.Equip. Classa (o1) CC- s Equipment Description (c b n or ri) ,.-,. I CA-er Location:

Bldg. FloorEl. .Rooi Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

J H P-SW 'AA L"-P '41. 9ý P Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorale 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Js the anchorge free of beni, brokeh, m'issing or loose hardware?CIA','$ " "NEI UO N/All 3. Is the anchorageofree of corrosiQn that is more than mild surface YJkNI UE- N/A[-oxidation?

VAc i 4 4 cc ptb 1 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yt._NEI UOI N/AF-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y[-] NEI Uil N/AJX (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yo NEI UI-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.>'Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 C..nrrP.mnnnridnr.'

No *RR-19-173 C-302 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. r, 2-Z Equip. Class'2 (O ) MCC I Equipment Description (c.90, 6) ef-. "J , tn.+",-- G,,4a-l r 5 d-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Ale11, f77, -/Os 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry blockwalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? ' / -/ -DP e--"6,ND UD N/AD)ANII UE-D N/AQI YWN[O UD N/AI'AY N" UD-OW Other Adverse Coniditions
11. Have you looked M~ -'antfou~ind noother seismic conditoni'sthat'could ND UD adversely affect the safet functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: , -.Date: 101M Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 Nn

  • PS-19-171 C-303

-.*ý 0 (D 0 0 -u C.m-o C 0

-0 00 C4 m 3 CD0 0 0 0)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 00C29B Equip. Class' (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Emergena Protection Ra B ard Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165. Room, Area T2-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions'may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoras.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Y9NE YJPI NO UO N/A[ FI YP NO UO -N/AO.: YM NO UO N/AO ekn /dodea t-A4 on e ed A/D e, r A'4 S 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y14 NO UD N/AO.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YI NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 C-306 rnrrA.qnnndAnrA Nn -RR-17-17TA Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 00C29B Equip. Class1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description Emergenc Protection Relay Board Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

....8.; Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NEI UEI N/AED Yj] NO UO N/AD YO NO UO N/AD YPOINEI UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YJt NEI U ..adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)-p~y~or u~lt 6eU iamoyt or restT-L Evaluated by:.Date: ~*~$ ~.Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 MPR-3812, Revision 3 r.nrrqnnndrnr.P Nn -P.-19-17.1 C-307

--k / -0 2-0!.0 2 C4 0 0 14 c m-D C.5.2 (D 5 0 0 C)0 r~3 Co w

-w-. 0;03 (. D'3-0 co m C)0 0o co

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A037&oldid=1362766"