ML112030663

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRC Comments on Draft Licensee-Developed Exam (Operating) (Folder 2)
ML112030663
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/2011
From: David Silk
Operations Branch I
To:
Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
JACKSON D RGN-I/DRS/OB/610-337-5306
Shared Package
ML110030662 List:
References
TAC U01832
Download: ML112030663 (4)


Text

Millstone 3 Operating Test Comments Scenarios NRC-01:

Event 2: Add "Tech Spec entry."

Event 3: Indicate that instrument fails high.

Event 5: Add "Tech Spec entry." Is there a TS entry for loss of second MDAFWP?

Event 5: There are not many significant manipulations for the BOP.

Event 6: Reduce size of LOCA.

Event 7: Change to have one MSIV fail to automatically close.

On page 71/80, include approximate RCS pressure value instead of "XXXX."

On page 11/80, explain the significance of the third and fourth bullets with respect to plant/simulator differences.

NRC-02:

Event 1: Add "Tech Spec entry."

Event 2: Add "Tech Spec entry." This basically the same Tech Spec as Event 1.

Event 3: Specify SGTL size.

Event 3: Add "Tech Spec entry."

Event 4: Provide valve numbers of components needed to isolate the faulted SG.

Event 6: Modify steam line break ramp rate.

Event 7: Specify which HPSI components do not respond to SI signal.

NRC-03:

Event 2: Add "Tech Spec entry."

Event 4: Add "Tech Spec entry."

Event 8: Specify which CVCS components do not respond to SI signal.

NRC-04:

Event 2: Page 14 - delete OMOC prompt Event 3: Add "Tech Spec entry."

Event 4: Add "Tech Spec entry."

Event 5: "Weak" component failure - not much action required by operators.

Event 5: Page 24 - delete OMOC prompt Event 7: Reduce LOCA size.

Administrative JPMs RO Admin JPMs:

A.1.1: Last column on Attachment 1 of the procedure is incorrect.

Add cue about NI channel recalibration to initial conditions.

Provide data instead of using the simulator.

Revise KIA as 2.1.19 addresses using the PPC which is not available.

A.1.2: Provide entire procedures as references not just the necessary pages.

Specify time from trip in cue.

Clarify that SMM section is N/A.

Key: step 4.2.5.a - Range should be -6.8 to -'7.0 Key: step 4.3.2 - Range should be negative Xenon correction log should 1047 ppm vs 1030 ppm and check range.

A.2: Add cues on pages 5,6,7,8, 12, 16, 17 to initial conditions.

Page 9 cue - can't the applicants find the specific volume by themselves?

Need to find a "cleaner" end point for JPM to avoid need for final cue.

Find a way to end ,,'PM at the final critical step.

Key: Calc Table 3, Final specific volume should be 0.002258 vs 44.29.

A.3: No comment.

SRO Admin JPMs:

A.1.1: Modify initiating cue: Who is eligible to come in and why are other not eligible?

Correct step 5 - Operator 2 not Operator 5 (or Operator 1)

Add dual response possible for Operator 5.

A.1.2: Move cues from pages 5, 11, 15 to initial conditions In initiating cue, ask applicant to list actions to be taken.

End at step 20.

A.2: Modify end of JPM for clarity.

A.3: Skip EP part of this JPM. Event is not classifiable.

Move necessary cues to initial conditions.

Have applicant calculate release rate and determine required notifications.

A.4: Have applicant complete notification form to record his answers.

Provide parameters not STA injects.

Modify scenario for one release pathway from containment.

System JPMs SCRJPMs:

S.1: Terminate JPM at step 21 (AOP step 2.D after emergency boration initiated.

S.2: Add cue about another RO checking the PPC.

S.3: No comment other than specific task standard may be needed.

S.4: Correct key number for valve.

S.S: Step 32 should be step 31. Modify step 25 to be less restrictive.

S.6: No comment.

S.7: No comment.

S.8: Clarify critical time action.

In-Plant JPMs:

P.1: Add notes regarding valve locations for examiners.

P.2: No comment.

P.3: No comment.

Millstone 3 Examination Outline Comments General Items Are there 9 applicants (3,4,2) vs 14 (3,7,4)? Yes Prep week 6/13/11? Yes Exam week 7/11/11? Yes Written Exam? 7/18/11 Meet the applicants during prep week. Licensee will set up date & time.

Admin JPMs SROA.4: Previous or modified? Previous System JPMs Can any of the JPMs be paired to administer simultaneously in the simulator? Licensee will check.

S.1: Previous or modified (JPM has the same title as 2009 exam)? Modified.

S.3: JPM appears to belong in SF 4 (Heat removal)? Depressurizing to establish F & B.

S.8: Appears to belong in SF 8 (Plant Service - fire protection) versus 7 (Instr - RPS)? Fire Protection procedures direct a reactor trip and thus "hit" SF 7 for RPS.

Scenarios May need to use Scenario 4 since we did not use a low power scenario in the past two exams.

Will revisit during prep week and license will revise 301-5&6 forms.

Scenario 1 Event 3 - This is not a TS call???? Control vs protective feature Scenario 3 Event 1 - This is not a TS call???? Control vs protective feature Written Exam Do you plan on having any questions which require references? About 3 SRO TS-related Qs.

SRO Tier 1 1 Group 2: "X" Site specific KA??? How does this get factored into the selection?

SRO Tier 2/Group 2: "Site specific AMSAC?? How is this factored in the selection?

Licensee incorporates SBO. AMSAC and weather-related AOPs in their selection process.