Text

Attachment 1, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Revision, 23
	ML101300374
Person / Time
Site:	Hope Creek
Issue date:	08/06/2009
From:	Shelton J; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	LR-N10-0140
	Download: ML101300374 (154)
	v • d • e

Attachment 1 ODCM Revisions Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23

I.

OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL FOR PSEG NUCLEAR LLC HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION Revision 23 Prepared by: ?6/o*

Date Accepted by:

I*

Accepted by:

Hope Creek.PORC Chairman- Bidin Booth Dit

Meeting*#: =ix q-W.--4k, Approved by:

Hope Creek.Plant Manager- John Perry ui i'll

.LU

-z 0

CL Page 1 of 153 Ld

I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Revision Summary Revision SummaryS

1. Revised the definitions 1.24 for MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC to be consistent with the definitions in 10CFR20 and 40CFRI 90. A member of the public is defined in 10CFR20 as "any individual except when that individual is receiving -an occupational dose." A member of the public is defined in 40CFRI90 as "any individual that can receive a radiation dose in the general environment, whether he may or may not also be exposed to radiation in an occupation associated with a nuclear fuel cycle. However, an individual is not considered a member of the public during any period in which the individual is engaged in carrying out any operation which is part of a nuclear fuel cycle."

Justification:

The Salem ODCM definitions 1.24 for member of the public were revised to be consistent with the definitions in 10CFR20, 40CFR190 and revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 4.1 Program or Monitoring Radioactivity in the Environment that was recently published in June 2009.

2009 RETS FASA 70096339- 0110.

2. Revised the definition 1.41 for SITE BOUNDARY by adding the words "or property" after "land".

Justification:

This change is based on the new definitions for site boundary in revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 4.1 Program or Monitoring Radioactivity in the Environment that was recently published in June 2009.

This definition allows for the inclusion of "property" such as structures and transmission towers to be part of the site boundary if they are located on'the property'line.

2009 RETS FASA 70096339- 0120.

3. The following sentence was added to the end of footnote 2 in Table 3.12. 1-1 "Sector 7 does not have a direct radiation monitoring station in the outer ring due to inaccessibility." Added an explanation for not having a TLD in the outer ring (5 - 11 kin) of sector 7 (SE) as required by Table 3.12.1-1 item 1. Item Istates that "An outer ring of stations, one in each land-basedmeteorological sector in the 5 to 11 -km range from the site (not bounded by or over water)".. The footnote identifies that no direct radiation monitoring station are located in the outer ring in sector 8,but fails to mention that no TLD is collected in Sector 7.

0 Justification:

SThis change was made to accurately reflect the fact that two sectors do not have direct radiation oc./) monitoring station located in the outer ring. Sector 7 is located in marsh land and no roads are

> available to provide access to this sector location. NUREG 1302 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance allows Table 3.12.1 Table Notation (2) third sentence states: "The number of direct radiation 0 monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical limitations; e.g., at an ocean site, some sectors will be over water so that the number of dosimeters may be reduced accordingly." Thereforeý,

no TLD location in Sector 7 should be considered acceptable by the NRC since this sector location ii surrounded by water. 2009 REMP FASA 70089372-0250 o 4.Deleted the words "centerline of one reactor" in first sentence of the third paragraph section 6.9.1.7 since itf was inaccurate. It was replaced with "midpoint of a line between the center of the Salem units 1 & 2 I

_d containment domes". The same change was made to Table 3.12.1-1 Table Notation 1 first sentence.

The words "from the centerline of one reactor" were replaced with "midpoint of a line between the o center of the Salem units 1 & 2 containment domes."

J i)

Justification:

Page 2 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I-,* This change was made to correct-the location that was copied from NUREG 1302 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance, Table 3.12.1, Table Notation (1) namely, "centerline of one reactor." This guidance is for a single reactor site. The reference location for Salem 1 and 2 is the midp0orit of a line between the center of the Salem units 1 & 2 containment domes. This reference point was used by PSEG drafting to determine the distance and direction to each sampling/monitoring location (see Table E-I).

2009 REMP FASA 70089372-0240

5. Appendix E Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Table E-I REMP Sample Locations: Deleted the words "of vent" after the direction specified for each Station Location.). Added some descriptions to Sample Stations 2S4, 4SI, 15iI, 16S1, I 1E2 and 2F3. Added the following alternate sampling locations for surface water locations on the Delaware River I lAla, 12Cl a, 7E1 a, and 1F2.

Justification: The reference point for Salem vent was changed because it was inaccurate (see 4. above). The additional descriptions were added to some locations for clarification. The alternate surface water locations allow safer access to these locations on the river during the winter months. These alternate locations are in the general vicinity of the primary location and would have the same distance and direction listed in Table E-1.2009 REM? FASA 70089372-0220

6. Appendix E Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program: Add a footnote to the Station Location which reads" *All distances and directions for the Station Locations are referenced to the midpoint between the two Salem units' containments. The WGS 84 coordinates for this site center point location are:

Latitude'N 390 - 27' - 46.5" and Longitude W 750 - 32' - 10.6". This footnote more accurately explains the reference point that was used for determining distances and directions to the I.U) sample/monitoring locations (see 4 above).

LU Justification:. The reference point for Salem I and 2 was changed because it was inaccurate (see 4. above).

2009 REMP FASA 70089372-0240 I

0 I2<E, 7. Revise the lo site access cation of the 5S1 air sampling station from "1.0 miles E of vent, site access road" to "0.95 miles rc ad". The movement of the air sampling station was IAW DCP 80088766.

Justification: TIhis change was implemented to provide a more reliable power source to the air sampling station.

Ln Air sampling st ation 5Sl has experiencing several missed air samples per year as a result of unplanned power outages. This new feed has a back-ut diesel generator which will supply power in the unlikely event of a loss 0" of power. DCP 80088766 and Notifications 20426132 and 20426221

8. Revise Secti on 2.5.2: to add to the first sentence; "for the resident/dairy location" after the words "dose 0c assessment".

Justification: This clarification was made to this dose assessment methodology to better align it with the derivation and j Ustification of the simplified dose calculation described in Appendix D.

> 2009 RETS FA SA 70096339-0140.

0

9. Revise Section 3.1: to align with the new definition of a "member of the public" (see 4. above). Also, identify the assumptions employed in current year dose calculation (for a member of the public inside the site Ld boundary) to better align with the Requirements of section 6.9.1.8 Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report.

Page 3 of 153

I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I Justification: This change was in response to a Program Improvement that was recommendedin the 2009 RETS FASA 70096339-0150. To better align with the revised definition of,"member of thepublic" and requiremenits I

of section 6.9.1.8 Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report 2009 PETS FASA 7009633.9-0150. ,I I

I I

S I 0

0 LU I

z i

I zLI 0

0 I

0 LU I

zM I

Ln V) 0 I

0~

©K 0-

. In

D Page 4 of 153 I

0 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.....................................................8 PART I - RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS ....................................................... 9 1.0 DEFINITIO N S ............................................................................................................................. 11 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS .......................................................... 17 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY .......................................................................................................... ......... 17 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION ....... ...................................... 19 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION. 19 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION24 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS .......................................... ........................................ 31 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS................................................................................................. 31 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION ............................... .......... 31 3/4.11.1.2 DO SE ....................................................................................................................... 35 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM .......................... 36 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS..... ......................... ............................ 37 3..............................

3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE ................. .............. ............... 37 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE - NOBLE GASES ............................. .......... 40 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE - IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN I PARTI ULATE FORM ...... .. : ....... .............................................................

~ ~~~PARTICULATE FORM ........................ ..............

3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT ......... ,................................................. 42

..... .................... 41 4

3/4.11.2.5 VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT..................................... ........................ 43 3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR. R.. G ............ ........................................................ 44 c)314.11.4 TO TAL D O SE .............................. .. ................ ................................................................... 45 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ........................ 46 3 4 2. MO I O NG P O R M . .......... . ............ ................................ e,............................. 46 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS ...... ............................................ 59 12 ~ 3/4.12.3

~~BA INTERLABORA TORY SES ....................................... COMPARISONNPROGRM I

............. ..................................... ...... 61 60

,...,.......... i........... .. .......... 6

<3/4.3 N STR UME T A TIO N ........................................:........... .0....

3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION. 62 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION62 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS....................................... 63 0 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS ..... ....... ............. ............................................... 63 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS....... .................................... (4

>a 3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE ...................................................................................... ................ 66 ta::I3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ............................................. 67

- 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM ........................... .......... 67 t- 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS ......................................... 67

- .wlll 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM ......................................... 68 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES ....................................................................................................... 70 rK*5.1 SITE.................................................................................................................................... 70 6.0 ADM INISTRATIVE CONTROLS .......................................................................................... 72

.6.9.1.6 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT......72 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT ................................................ 73 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS ............................................. 75 V C~fwPage 5 of 153

/

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I PART H - CALCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES ................................................................... 76 1.0 LIQ U ID EFFLU EN TS,.............. ii.................................. ........ "......I............ ....... .... ................. 77 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls ................ 77 1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint:Determination.;. ............... ...... ............ 77 1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors ...................................................... 77 1.2.2 Conservative Default Values ... ............ ....................... 77 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits :- 10 CFR 20 ......................... ......................... 77 1.4 Liquid Effluent DoseCalculation - 10 CFR50 ................................ ........................... 77 1.4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose - Liquid Effluents ................... .. ..77 1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation ......................................................... 77 1.5 : Liquid Effluent Dose Projections ................................... 77 1.6 Representative Samples ..... ......................................... 77 2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS ............................................. ................... .............. ..... 77 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls ................................................ 77 2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination ........... ............. 77 2.2.1 Plant Vent, FRVS ..................... .. ..................... 77 2.2.2 Conservative Default Values ................ e.......... .................. 77 2.3 Gaseous Effluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations - 10 CFR 20 ......................... 77 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Noble Gases ................ .................. 77 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Radioiodine and Particulates...................................... 77 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations -10 CFR 50 .... .......................................... 77 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Noble Gases ...................... ............................. .77 2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases .................................................... 77 Z 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations - 10 CFR 50.. ... ......................... 77 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Radioiodine and Particulates ....................... 77 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radioiodines and Particulates ........................ 77 2.6 Gaseous Effluent Dose Projection ........................................................................... 77 3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSIS ... ..................................................................................... 77 R 3.1 Doses Due to Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY ................... ............................. 77 3.2 Total Dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC - 40iCFR 190,e................................ 77 3.2.1 Effl uent Dose Calculations .............................................................................. 77

£ 3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination .................................. ... 77 0

4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ................................ 77

> 4.1 Sampling Program ................................................ ................................................... 77 Cy- 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program .......... ............................................................. 77

_ 5.0 HCGS EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING PROGRAM: .................. . . ......... 77

> I 0

LJ 0

n.

VPage 6 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLES TABLE 1.1: SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY NOTATION ......................................... ,................................. 14 TABLE 1.2: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS ................. .......................... 15 TABLE 3.3.7. 10-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION .............. 20 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREM ENTS .................................................. . ......................................................... 22 TABLE 3.3.7.11 -1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION ...... 25 TABLE 4.3.7.1 -1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS.................................. ................ *28 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM ........... 32 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM ..... 38 TABLE 3.12.1-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM *............................48 TABLE 3.12.1-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONM ENTAL SAM PLES ........................................................... ,........................................................ .......... 555 TABLE 4.12.1-1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS("' (2). ....... 56 TABLE 1-1: PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION ................................... 77 TABLE 1-2: SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Ao........................ ............... . . . 77 TABLE 1-3: BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS .................. ........................ I......... ................................... 77 TABLE 2-1: DOSE FACTORS FOR NOBLE GASES .................................... 77 TABLE 2-2: PARAMETERS FOR GASEOUS ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION ............................... 77 TABLE 2-3: CONTROLLING LOCATIONS, PATHWAYS AND ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FOR DOSE.

CALCU LA TION S*................................................................................................ ................................................... 77 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases, R(io) ........................................................................ 77 TABLE A-I: CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE MPC - HOPE CREEK ................................................................ 77 TABLE B-I: Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Invertebrate Pathways ............................................................ 77 0/ TABLE C lI: Effective Dose Factors Noble Gases ........................................ ..... ................................. .77 TTABLE TABLE D-1: InfantPDose E-1: REM Contributions Sample ................................................................. ....................................................

Locations ...................................................................................................................... 77 77

- TABLE F-1: Maximum Permissible Concentrations ...................................... 77 FIGURES v) Figure 5.1.1-1 Area Plot Plan Of Site............................................... 71 Figure 1-1: Liquid Radwaste Treatment And Monitoring System..., .............. ......... 77 Figure 1-2: Solid Radwaste Processing System ................................. ............................................ ................ 77 I "

Figure 2-1! Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System ....

Figure 2-2: Ventilation Exhaust Treatment System ....................................

Figure E-l: Onsite Sampling Locations ....

...... .i........................................

77 77 77 a*L" Figure E-2: Off-Site Sampling Locations ..................... .................... ................ .................... ... ,77

. APPENDICES.

U.. APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default MPC Value for Liquid Effluent Monitors ................................. 77 i > APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors - Liquid Effluent ........,................... 77 mo* APPENDIX C: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors - Gaseous Effluents ................................... 77 0

o APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Parameters - Gaseous Effluent .............................. 77

. APPENDIX E: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ........................................................ 77

-n APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values For Liquid Effluents ................. 77 03 Uj, Uj Page 7 of 153

I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 HOPE CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL INTRODUCTION The Hope Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) is a supporting document to the Hope Creek Technical Specifications. The previous Limiting Conditions for Operations that were contained in the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS) are now included in the ODCM as Radiological Effluent Controls (REC). The ODCM contains two parts: Part I - Radiological Effluent Controls, and Part II - Calculational Methodologies.

Part I includes the following:

9 The Radiological Effluent Controls and the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical Specifications 6.8.4

Descriptions of the information that should be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report required by Technical Specifications 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7, respectively.

Part II describes methodologies and parameters used for:

the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation alarm/trip setpoints; and o the calculation of radioactive liquid and gaseous concentrations, dose rates, cumulative quarterly

.. and yearly doses, and projected doses.

U Part II also contains a list and graphical description of the specific sample locations for the radiological 0 environmental monitoring program (REMP), and the liquid and gaseous waste treatment systems.

V) The current licensing basis applies Maximum Permissibl e Concentrations (MPCs)lfor radioactive liquid" effluent concentration limits. Since the MPCrvalues were removed from 10CFR20 effective 1/1/94, the

~ MPC values are provided as Appendix F to the ODCM. As discussed in the Safety Evaluation By The

Office Of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Related to Amendment No.121, letters between the Nuclear o Management and Resources Council (NUMARC) concerning the differences between the "old" 10CFR20

~ and the "new" 10CFR20 allowed continued use of the instantaneous release limits (MPCs). The

NUMARC letter of April 28, 1993, concluded that the RETS that reference the "old" Part 20 are generally 0 more restrictive than the comparable requirements of the "new" Part 20, and therefore, in accordance with Z_ 10 CFR 20.1008, the existing RETS could remain in force after the licensee implements the "new" Part

_ 20. The 16tter stated that the existing RETS which reference the "old" Part 20 would maintain the level of

, required protection of public health and safety, and would be consistent with the requirements of the "new" Part 20.

0 LI, Ew" 0

CL V) iPage 8 of 153

I I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I.

I I

I PART I - RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS I

I I

Hg w

I~I C~)

I; x

~rI U-0 Li IL Page 9 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 S

SECTION 1.0 DEFINITIONS I

I I

I Ld 0D z

C-)

!I z

I 0

0 7ý LUI I

I I

LJ Ld r

U-2W LJ LUJ LU 0)

Page 10 of 153 I

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

' O 1.0 DEFINITIONS The following terms are defined so that uniform interpretation of these CONTROLS may be achieved.

The defined terms appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these CONTROLS.

ACTION 1.1 ACTION shall be that part of a CONTROL which prescribes remedial measures required under designated conditions.

CHANNEL CALIBRATION 1.4 A CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be the adjustment, as necessary, of the channel output such that it responds with the necessary range and accuracy to known values of the parameter that the channel monitors. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall encompass the entire channel, including the required sensor, alarm, display, and trip functions, and shall include the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.

Calibration of instrument channels with resistance temperature detector (RTD) or thermocouple sensors may consist of an in place qualitative assessment of sensor behavior and normal calibration of the remaining adjustable devices in the channel. Whenever an RTD or thermocouple sensing element is replaced, the next required CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall include an in place cross calibration that compares the other sensing elements with the recently installed sensing monitor. The CHANNEL CALIBRATION may be performed by means' f any series of sequential, overlapping, or total channel steps so that the entire channel is calibrated.

CHANNEL CHECK 1.5 A CHANNEL CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel behavior during operation by 0 observation. This determination shall include, where possible, comparison of the channel indication and/or status with other indications and/or status derived from independent instrument channels measuring the S same parameter.

I~ CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST 1.6 A CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be:

a. Analog channels - the injection of a simulated signal into the channel as close to the sensor as practicable to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions and Z channel failure trips.

,, b. Bistable channels - the injection of a simulated signal into the sensor to verify OPERABILITY including alarm and/or trip functions.

hI S The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST may be performed by any series of sequential, overlapping 'ortotal channel steps such that the entire channel is tested.

0 CONTROL L- 1.10 The Limiting Conditions for Operation (LCOs) that were contained in the Radiological Effluent

Technical Specifications were transferred to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) and were renamed CONTROLS. This is to distinguish between those LCOs that were retained in the Z Technical Specifications and those LCOs or CONTROLS that were transferred to the ODCM.

0Y Page 11 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 S DEFINITIONS (Continued)

DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 1.11 DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 shall be that concentration of 1-131 (microcuries per gram), which alone would produce the same thyroid dose as the quantity and isotopic mixture of 1-13 1, 1-132, 1-133, 1-134, and 1-135 actually present. The thyroid dose conversion factors used for this calculation shall -be those listed in Table III of TID-14844 "Calculation of Distance Factors for Power and Test Reactor Sites." I FREQUENCY NOTATION 1.17 The FREQUENCY NOTATION specified for the performance of Surveillance Requirements shall correspond to the intervals defined in Table 1.1.

MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC 1.24 MEMBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC (10 CFR 20) - Means any individual except when that individual is receiving an occupational dose.

MEMEBER(S) OF THE PUBLIC (40 CFR 1,90) - Means any individual that can receive a radiation do se in the general environment, whether he may or may not also be exposed to radiation in an occupation associated with a nuclear fuel cycle. However, an individual is not considered a member of the public during any period in which the individual is engage d in carrying out any operation which is part of a nuclear fuel cycle.

OFF-GAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM (GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM) 1.26 An OFF-GAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM (GASEOUS RADWASTE

,.) TREATMENT SYSTEM) is any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents, z by collecting prinmary coolant system offgases from the main condenser evacuation system and

-' providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the

' environment.

z OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM)

Vj) 1.27 The OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM) shall contain the methodology and

< parameters used in the calculation of offsite doses due to radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents, in

) the calculation of gaseous and liquid effluent monitoring alarm/trip setpoints, and in the conduct of the z" radiological environmental monitoring program. The ODCM shall also contain (1) the Radioactive 0 Effluent Controls and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs required by Technical

> Specification Section 6.8.4 and (2) descriptions of the information that should be included in the c* Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report and the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release 0 Reports required by Technical Specification Sections 6.9.1.6 and 6.91.7, respectively.

_ Reot eurdb ehia SeiiainScin ... 6ad6917 epciey Q:: OPERABLE - OPERABILITY

> 1.28 A system, subsystem, train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY y when it is capable of performing its specified function(s), and when all necessary attendant 0

instrumentation, controls, electrical power, cooling or seal'water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the system, ýsubsystem, train, component or device to perform its b function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s).

0 L.A V) I Page12 ofl153 D

" Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I S DEFINITIONS (Continued)

OPERATIONAL CONDITION - CONDITION 1.29 An OPERATIONAL CONDITION (i.e., CONDITION) shall be any one inclusive combination of mode switch position and average reactor coolant temperature as specified in Table 1.2.

PURGE - PURGING 1.34 PURGE or PURGING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in such a manner that replacement air or gas is required to purify the confinement.

RATED THERMAL POWER 1.35 RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3339 MWT.

REPORTABLE EVENT 1.37 A REPORTABLE EVENT shall be any of those conditions' specified in Section 50.73 to 10CFR Part 50 or 10CFR 72.75.

SITE BOUNDARY 1.41 The SITE BOUNDARY shall be that line beyond which the land or property is neither owned, I li nor leased, nor otherwise controlled by the licensee.

Ln SOURCE CHECK I* 1.43 SOURCE CHECK shall be the qualitative assessment of channel response when the channel sensor is exposed to a source of increased radioactivity.

I Q THERMAL POWER 1.47 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.

C/)

I UNRESTRICTED AREA 1.50 An UNRESTRICTED AREA shall be any area at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY, access to V/) which is not controlled by the licensee for purposes of protection of individuals from exposure to I0 radiation and radioactive materials, or any area within the SITE BOUNDARY used for residential V) quarters or for industrial, commercial, institutional,ý and/or recreational purposes.

w Iac VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM 1.51 A VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce gaseous radioiodine and radioactive material in particulate form in effluents by passing ventilation or vent exhaust gases through charcoal adsorbers and/or HEPA filters for the

> purpose of removing iodines or particulates from the gaseous exhaust stream prior to the release co- to the environment. Such a system is not considered to have any effect on noble gas effluents.

IU Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) atmospheric cleanup systems are not considered to be VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM components.

In Cn w

03 I* Page 13 of 153

I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I DEFINITIONS (Continued)

VENTING I

1.52 VENTING shall be the controlled process of discharging air or gas from a confinement to maintain temperature, pressure, humidity, concentration, or other operating condition, in suchta manner that replacement air or gas is not provided or required during VENTING. Vent, used in I

system names, does not imply a VENTING process.

I TABLE 1.1: SURVEILLANCE FREOUENCY NOTATION I NOTATION FREQUENCY I S At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

D At least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . I w At least once per 7 days.

M At least once per 31 days.

10Q At least once per 92 days.

U-SA At least once per 184 days.

z* A At least once per 366 days..

I (2 R At least once per 18 months (550 days).

z Slu Prior to each reactor startup.

(~i1 P Prior to each radioactive release.

(~1 z During startup, pridr to exceeding 30% of RATED THERMAL POWER, if not performed 0

within the previous 7 days.

LJ N.A. Not applicable.

0 L./

LUJ 0

U_

LU L-rK" 7

0 0

LUJ 0

LUJ Page 14 of 153 D

U ,Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I

DEFINITIONS (Continued)

TABLE 1.2: OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS MODE SWITCH AVERAGE REACTOR CONDITION POSITION COOLANT TEMPERATURE

1. POWER OPERATION Run Any temperature

2. STARTUP Startup/Hot Standby Any temperature

3. HOT SHUTDOWN Shutdown.* > 200OF

4. COLD SHUTDOWN Shutdown#.

t , < 2000 F+

5. REFUELING* Shutdown or Refuel *' # < 140°F

The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Run, Startup/Hot Standby, or Refuel position to

<. test the switch interlock functions and related instrumentation provided that the control rods are verified to remain fully inserted by a second licensed operator or other technically qualified member of the unit technical staff. If the reactor mode switch is placed in the Refuel position, the one-rod-out interlock shall be OPERABLE.

1. The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod drive is being removed from the reactor pressure vessel per Technical Specification 3.9.10.1.

Fuel in the reactor vessel with the vessel head closure bolts less than fully tensioned or with the Ln head removed.

- See Special Test Exceptions Technical Specification sections 3.10.1 and 3.10.3.

__ * ** The reactor mode switch may be placed in the Refuel position while a single control rod is being recoupled or withdrawn provided that the one-rod-out interlock is OPERABLE.

I

'ry 0

+ See Special Test Exception Technical Specification 3.10.8.

LUJ 0La Page 15 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 PART I RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT CONTROLS SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS p

I---

0 0

w) 1~~

z.

ii c-0 0

0 U-[,i.

w D

z3

02 0.

w1 LU 0 , Page 16 of 153

I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

' O 3/4 CONTROLS AND SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3/4.0 APPLICA3ILITY I CONTROLS I 3.0.1 Compliance with the CONTROLS contained in the succeeding CONTROLS is required during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other conditions specified therein; except that upon failure to meet I the CONTROLS, the associated ACTION requirements shall be met.

3.0.2 Noncompliance with a CONTROL shall exist when the requirements of the CONTROL and E associated ACTION requirements are not metwithin the specified time intervals. If the CONTROL is restored prior to expiration of the specified time intervals, completion of the ACTION requirements is not required.

I 3.0.3 When a CONTROL is not met, except as provided in the associated ACTION requirements, within one hour action shall be initiated to place the unit in an OPERATIONAL CONDITION in which the CONTROL does not apply by placing it, as applicable, in:

1. At least STARTUP within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months ,

- 2. At least HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months , and

3. At least COLD SHUTDOWN within the subsequent 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Where corrective measures are completed that permit operation under the ACTION requirements, the ACTION may be taken in accordance with the specified time limits as measured from the time of failure to meet the CONTROL. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.

0) This CONTROL is not applicable in OPERATIONAL CONDITION 4 or 5.

I) 3.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other specified condition shall not be made when ji IC the conditions of the CONTROLS are not met and the associated ACTION requires a shutdown if they are not met within a specified time interval. Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified condition may be made in accordance with ACTION requirements when conformance to them permits 10 Cy continued operation of the facility for an unlimited period of time. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION requirements. Exceptions to these requirements are stated in the individual CONTROLS.

I 3.0.5Equipmnent removed from service or declared inoperable to comply with ACTIONS may be returned to service under administrative control solely to perform testing to demonstrate its OPERABILITY or the OPERABILITY of other equipment. This is an exception to CONTROL 3.0.2 for IW the system returned to service under administrative control to perform the testing required to demonstrate OPERABILITY.

U) 0_ __ _ Page 17 of 153

I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I S APPLICABILITY (Continued)

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.0.1 Surveillance Requirements shall be met during the OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS or other I conditions specified for individual CONTROLS unless otherwise stated in an individual Surveillance Requirement.

4.0.2 Each Surveillance Requirement shall be performed within the specified surveillance interval with a maximum allowable extension not to exceed 25 percent of the specified surveillance interval.

4.0.3 Failure to perform a Surveillance Requirement within the allowed surveillance interval, defined by CONTROL 4.0.2, shall constitute a failure to meet. the OPERABILITY requi.rements for a CONTROL.

The time limits of the ACTION requirements are applic.able at the time it is identified that a Surveillance Requirement has not been performed. The ACTION requirements may be delayed for up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months to permit the completion of the surveillance when the allowed outage time limits of the ACTION requirements are less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . Surveillance Requirements do not have to be performed on inoperable equipment.

I 4.0.4 Entry into an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified applicable condition shall not be made unless the Surveillance Requirement(s) associated With the CONTROLS have been-performed D within the applicable surveillance interval or as otherwise specified. This provision shall not prevent passage through or to OPERATIONALUCONDITIONS as required to comply with ACTION V) requirements.

(.z C-) , i 0

(I)

LUJ ryr z"

LU 0

Ln D~~>

0 r,)

LuJ Lu Page 18 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I* 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.7.10 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 1, the radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1 shall be OPERABLE with their Alarm/Trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded. The Alarm/Trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).

APPLICABILITY: During all liquid releases via these pathways.

ACTION:

a. With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel Alarm/Trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL, immediately suspend the release of radioactive liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative.

I* b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table 3.3.7.10-1.

Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent Release report why the inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

c. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS mZ 4.3.7.10 Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.10-1.

0 C/)

n 0

Zv iI IwLI) Page 19 of 153

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES W E Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE ACTINT

1. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling 1 110 Tower Blowdown Line b., Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump 1 110 Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower*

2. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent 1 111

3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES

a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling 112 Tower Blowdown Line 1

b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Weir 112

c. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump N/A N/A Discharge Line**

Page 20 of 153 r I

- -I

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.3.7.10-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATION ACTION 110- With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that prior to initiating a release:

a. At least two independent samples are analyzed in accordance with CONTROL 4.11.1.1.2, and

b. At least two technically qualified members of the Facility Staff independently verify the release rate calculations and discharge line valving; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTION I ll - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that, at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months , grab samples are collected and analyzed for principal gamma emitters, 1-13 1, and dissolved and entrained noble gases at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11. 1.1.1-1 .B, and the Surveillance Requirement 4.11.1.1.2 is performed. Otherwise, suspend the release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTION 112 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the I

-flow

.performance rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months during actual releases. Pump curves generated in place may be used to estimate flow.

See Appendix A for setpoint determination for the Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump (TBCWDWS). Different setpoints are established for this monitor based on its use for batch release or continuous release. Automatic termination of releases from the

')

> TBCWDWS the TBCWDWS. is by trip of the sump pump(s). ACTION 110 only applies to batch releases for Continuous releases are not authorized with the TBCWDWS radiation monitor inoperable.

- There are no discharge process flow rate measurement devices for this pathway. Conservative assumptions are made for release rates. The maximum release rate from the sump is 100 gpm.

> This value should be used for setpoint calculations to determine compliance with CONTROL 0-1 3.11.1.1. More realistic values may be used to calculate total activity released and dose 0,. consequences. Actual values should be used if process flow measurement devices are installed.

Page 21 of 153

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES W W w Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.3.7.10-1: RAIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING-INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST

1. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. LiquiidRadwaste Discharge Line to the Cooling D P R(3) Q(l)

Tower Blowdown Line

b. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering D(5) M R(3) Q(I)(6)

Sump Discharge Line to the Cooling Tower-

2. RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Cooling Tower Blowdown Effluent D M R(3) Q(2)

3. FLOW RATEMEASUREMENT DEVICES

a. Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line to Cooling D(4) N.A. R Q Tower Blowdown Line

b. Cooling Tower Blowdown Weir -D(4) N.A. Q Page 22 of 153 F

- m

-1 1-1

-m

- -m m- m -

m - m m - - - - -

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

1. TABLE 4.3.7.10-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATIONS (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall demonstrate that automatic isolation of release from this pathway and control room alarm annunciation occur if any of the following conditions exist:

1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the Alarm/Trip setpoint, or

2. Circuit failure, or

3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.

(2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist:

1. Instrument indicates measured levels at or above the Alarm/Trip setpoint, or

2. Circuit failure, or

3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.

i,i (3) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS)/National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained C-)

from suppliers that participate in assurance activities with NBS/NIST. These standards

(.) shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement I13 range. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration or are NBS/NIST traceable shall be used.

(4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months on days on which continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made.

O* (5) In addition to performing channel check on rad monitor, PERFORM:

CHANNEL CHECK - daily, including verification of sample flow through the radiation

> monitor during sump pump operation.

0

" (6) Isolation is demonstrated by securing the discharge pump during the functional check g of nO I* ....... age 23 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS 3.3.7.11 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g. 1, the radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3.7.11-1 shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip:setpoints set to, ensure that the limits of CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels meeting CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

APPLICABILITY: As shown in Table 3.3.7.11-1 I ACTION:

a. With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above CONTROL; immediately suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel, or declare the channel inoperable, or change the setpoint so'it is acceptably conservative.

UJ b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the ACTION shown in Table

< 3.3.7.11-1. Exert best efforts to return the instrument to OPERABLE status O* within 30 days and, if unsuccessful, explain in the next Radioactive Effluent z Release Report pursuant to CONTROL .6.9.1.7 why this inoperability was not corrected in a timely manner.

c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.,

o SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS, CD 4.3.7.11 Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be z

demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the

>frequencies shown in Table 4.3.7.11-1.

0

-J L

0~

a_

P 4J V) Page 24 o 5

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.3.7.11-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPLICABILITY ACTION

1. DELETED

2. FILTRATION, RECIRCULATION AND VENTILATION MONITORING SYSTEM Noble Gas Activity Monitor *

a. 1 123

b. Iodine Sampler 1

125

c. Particulate Sampler 1

125

d. Flow Rate Monitor 1

122

122

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor

3. SOUTH PLANT VENT MONITORING SYSTEM

123

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1 1

125

b. Iodine Sampler

c. Particulate Sampler 1

125

d. Flow Rate Monitor 1

122

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 1

122 Page 25 of 153

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES W o Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.3.7.11-1 (Continued)

RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS INSTRUMENT OPERABLE APPIJCABIIJT YI A (tTC(M PERA LE APPLICA ILIT"

4. NORTH PLANT VENT MONITORING SYSTEM

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor 1

123

b. Iodine Sampler 1

125

c. Particulate Sampler 1

125

d. Flow Rate Monitor 1

122

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 1

122 Page 26 of 153

-M---- =m m m-- M

1I TABLE 3.3.7.1 1-1 (Continued)

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE NOTATION

At all times ACTION 122 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels QPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months .

Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.

ACTION 123 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided grab samples are taken at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months and these samples are analyzed for principal gamma emitters (noble gases) at the lower limits of detection required in ODCM CONTROL Table 4.11.2.1.2-1.A or B within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months . Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway..

ACTION 124 - DELETED I. ACTION 125 - With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the Minimum

'U Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue provided that within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 4.11.2.1.2-1.

LU 0

V-LUJ Page 27 of 153

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES U. U Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.3.7.11-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNE L "FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRALTION TEST* REQUIRED

1. DELETED

2. FILTRATION, RECIRCULATION AND VENTILATION MONITORING SYSTEM

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor SD M

R(2)- Q(1) *

b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A. *

c. Particulate Sampler w N.A. :N.A N.A. *

d. Flow Rate Monitor R:

D N.A. Q

,- e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor -.- -.... -,,D -- N.A,ý-- -R

Q

3. SOUTH PLANT VENT SYSTEM

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor R(2)

D M Q(l)

b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. ',N.A. N.A. *

N.A.

c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. *

d. Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q *

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q

Page 28 of 153 Am L I -- - -- - - ------ -

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.3.7.11 -1(Continued)

RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS CHANNEL MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL SURVIELLANCE INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST REOUIRED CHECK HECK CA IBRA ION TEST REQUIRED INSTRUME T

4. NORTH PLANT VENT SYSTEM

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor D M R(2) Q(l) *

b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A.

c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A.

N.A.

d. Flow Rate Monitor D

N.A. R Q

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor D N.A. R Q Page 29 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I TABLE 4.3.7.11-1 (Continued)

I S "TABLE NOTATION (1)

At all times The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that the control room alarm I

annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist: I

1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint.

2. Circuit failure.

I

3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure: I (2) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more of the reference standards certified by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS)/National Institute of Standards and Testing (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers I

that participate in measurement' assurance activities with NBS/NIST. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement range. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial I

calibration or are NBS/NIST traceable shall be used.

I I

,I 0

V-)

(I)

I r-n I1 0

L"

!1 LUI 0O V-LUJ 4.1 C/)

DU Page 30 of 153 II

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I f 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.2 and 3, the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (See Figure 5.1.1.1-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 10-4 microcuries/ml.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the concentration to within the above limits.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I.

Cn 4.11.1.1.1 Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program in Table 4.11.1A1.1-1.

4.1 1.1.1.2 The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1.

I.

-Je 0

Page 31 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1: RADIOACTIVE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM I

Lower Limit Minimum of Detection Liquid Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)(a)

Type Frequency: Frequency Analysis (gCi/ml)

A. Batch Waste P P

1) Release(b) Each Batch Each Batch Principal Gamma Sample Emitters(c) 5x1107 Tanks 1-131 1x10 6

2) Turbine Building P M Dissolved and Circulating Water One Entrained Gases 1xO0 Dewatering Sump Batch/M (Gamma Emitters) when released in P M H-3 Batch Mode* Each Batch Composite(d) 1x 10" Gross Alpha lxl 0" P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x1o 8 Each Batch Composite(d) 5X10-_

I Fe-55 UL 0

B. Continuous M Principal Gamma N/A Composite Emitters(c) 5X10"7 Releases(e)

C/) 1) Station Service 0 Water System (SSWS) (If contaminated as indicated by SACS 1-131 z or RACS system) lxi 0.6 0

2) Turbine Building W** M Dissolved and

H- Circulating Water Grab Entrained Gases lxl1-LI:

(J) Dewatering Sump* Sample D

NA M H-3 5 Ll Composite (d) 1X 0 Uv-Ix Gross Alpha ix10.7 Ix NA Q Sr-89, Sr-90 Ixd Composite (d) 5x 10" 0.

Fe-55 lxlO-DL 01 Page 32 of 153

UI Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.11.1.1.1-1 (Continued)

STABL E NOTATION

a. The LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that Iwill be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:

LLD

4.66 Sb D E 9 V 2.22E6 9.Y *exp(-AAt)

Where:

tLLD is the ,'a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as microcuries per unit mass or volume,,

4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute,.

S E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, Vi)

V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22E6 is the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, Xiis the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-'), and At for plant effluents is the elapsed time between midpoint of sample collection and time of I.

W counting (see).

Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.

Z It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a Rrori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

lI*

0 It..

I* ~ ~Page33 of 153 :..

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.11.1.1. 1-1 (Continued)

STABLE NOTATION

b. A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed by a method described in the ODCM to assure representative sampling.

c. The principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are: Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Ce-141. Ce-144 shall also be measured, but with an LLD of 5 x 10"6. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.

d. A :composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released.

e. A continuous release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a nondiscrete volume; e.g., from a volume of a system that has an input flow during the continuous release.,

The Turbine Building Circulating WaterDewatering Sump is a normal radwaste discharge pathway and is monitored as such because of possible contamination from the Turbine Building 0z Ventilation drains. Securing the sump pump provides discharge termination. Siphoning does not

<occur.,do to the differential height between the sump and the discharge point. Releases from the TBCWDS below the setpoint of 2X background are considered continuous releases. Sampling of continuous releases is performed using!'a continuous composite sampler. Samples for analyses required in Table 4.11.1.1.1.-1 for continuous releases are obtained from the composite sampler.

Releases from the sump at levels at or above 2x background may be performed as batch releases.

< Samples for analyses required in Table 4.11.1.1.1-1 for batch releases are obtained from the sump.

(/)

"**Thegrab sample from the Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump for dissolved 0 and entrained noble gases is required Monthly from the composite sampler.

0 0

0_. r KI

. Page 34 of153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS

' 3/4.11.1.2 DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.1.2 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.4 and 5, the dose or dose commitment to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released' from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited:

a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrem to any organ, and

b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrem to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable.

0 2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS D 4.11.1.2 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

0

>V)

Lu z0 Ii.2y Page 35 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I

S 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM CONTROLS I 3.11'.1.3 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the liquid radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE and appropriate portions of the system shall be used toi reduce the radioactive materials in liquid Wastes prior to their discharge when the projected doses I

due to the liquid effluent, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see Figure 5.1.1-1) would exceed 0.06 mrem to the total body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in any 31-day period. I APPLICABILITY:

ACTION:

At all times.

I

a. With radioactive liquid waste being discharged and in excess of the above limits and any portion of the liquid Radwaste treatment system not in operation, prepare and submit to I

the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information: II

1. Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability, I

03 w

S 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and I 0

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

C-)

b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable.

I z

H--. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I

0 03 z

4.11.1.3.1 Doses due to liquid releases from each reactor unit to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the I

0 Z

03 w

ODCM. I 4.11.1.3.2 The installed liquid Radwaste treatment system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by Uv- meeting CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.1.2. I U-I I

--J L.d w_

0 0y w/

I 0U nD Page 36 of 153 I

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

I 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I. 3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE I CONTROLS 3.11.2.1 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.44g.3 and 7, the dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1. -1) shall be limited to the following:

a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mremlyr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrem/yr to the skin, and

b. For iodine-13 1, iodine-133, tritium, and for all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrem/yr to any organ.

I APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

With the dose rate(s) exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the release rate to within the

above limit(s).

(V) 0 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I ~4.11.2. 1.1 The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined continuously to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.

I 4.11.2.1.2 The dose rate due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the 0 above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 4.11.2.1.2-1.

0 ma o Mi In V.)~

02

Page 37 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I

I TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1: RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM S Lower Limit I

Minimum of Detection Gaseous Release Sampling Analysis Type of Activity (LLD)(a)

Type Frequency Frequency Analysis (6Ci/ml)

A. Containment P P Principal Gamma 1x 104 I Each PURGE(C) Each PURGE(C) Emitters(b)

I PURGE Grab Sample P H-3 (oxide) 1x10"6 Vent M(c),(d) Principal Gamma lxlO"4 South Plant B. North Plant Vent Grab Sample M(C) Emitters(b)

FRVS (g)

.... H-3 (oxide) IxI106 C. All Release Continuous(e) W(0 Types as Charcoal 1-131 1x10 2 listed in A Sample and B above Ctnuu(e) Principal Gamma Continuous Particulate Emitters(b) lxl0"l Sample, Continuous(e) Q Gross Alpha 1x10"1 C_)

Composite 7 Particulate

)-

Z Sample _

0 Continuousce) Q Sr-89, Sr-90 1xl0" Composite Particulate

__________Sample.

z*

0 Continuousce) Noble Gas Noble Gasses 1xi 0-6

> Monitor Gross Beta or w.

Gamma 0

I 0~

(A Q:

Page 38 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.11.2.1.2-1 (Continued)

S TABLE NOTATION

a. The LLD is defined in Table 4.11.1.1.1-1

b. The-principal gamma emitters for which the LLD CONTROL applies exclusively are the following radionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-:133, Xe-133m, Xe-135,; and Xe-138 for noble gas releases and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 in iodine and particulate emissions. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.,

C. Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup or a THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER within a 1-hour period.

This requirement does not apply if:

1. Analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of three; and 2>' The noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.:

lI d. Tritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the spent fuel pool area, whenever fuel is in the spent fuel pool.

r e. The ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time (9-period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with CONTROLS Z 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2 and 3.11.2.3.

f. Samples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months after changing , or after removal from sampler. Sampling shall also be performed at

_least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup or THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER in 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months and 0 analyses shall be completed within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months of changing. When samples collected for 24 nhours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement does not apply if(l) analysis shows that the DOSE EQUIVALENT 1-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the Z noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased by more than a factor of three.

U-

g. Table 4.11.2.1.2-1, Notations "c", and "f' do not apply. Monthly samples for principle gamma emitters and tritium are required only if the FRVS Vent Fan(s) is in service greater 0 w than 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months . For noble gas and tritium, representative samples of Reactor Building may be

,~ obtained for compliance in lieu of skid samples. FRVS continuous samples required when V)

q z

FRVS Vent Fan(s) is in service for greater than 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months , 0B Page 39 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I

I* 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE - NOBLE GASES ip CONTROLS 3.11.2.2 In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 8, the air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following:,.,

I

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrad for gamma radiation and less thank.or equal to 10 mrad for beta radiation and, I

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to. 10 mrad for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrad for beta radiation.

I APPLICABILITY: At all times. I ACTION:

a. With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding I

any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special-Report that identifies-the cause(s) for I

exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce 0

S the release and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits; .

w 0

z b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.

C-)

Il SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS V/)

4.11.2.2 Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year I

for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the z ODCM at least once per 31 days.

H--

H, 0a. ýl

.©z LdI Il r,

0 p.

I 0

ILi I0l ii Page 40 of 153 I

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE - IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN 1:.4 PARTICULATE FORM CONTROLS 3.11.2.3 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specification 6.8.4.g.5 and 9, the dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1.1-1) shall be limited to the following:

a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrem to any organ and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrem to any organ.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With the calculated dose from the release of iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission I. within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that (V) have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.

(-)

z

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.

U-ULU SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.3 'Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine- 131, iodine-1 33, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days.

0 Wy 0-v (4.

0 ILtir-n-v C/

_A (3-V)

D Page 41 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. fJJ 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I

S 3/4.11.2.4 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT I

CONTROLS 3.11.2.4. In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be in operation. I APPLICABILITY: Whenever the main condenser steam jet air ejector.is in operation.

I ACTION:

a.. With gaseous radwaste from the main condenser air ejector system being discharged without treatment for more than 7 days, prepare and submit to the Commission within I

30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:

1. Identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the i inoperability, 2.

3.

Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

I

b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable. I I V)

S f

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS C---

0 4.11.2.4 The readings of the relevant instruments shall be checked every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months when the main LUJ condenser air ejector is in use to ensure that the gaseous radwaste treatment system is functioning.

0 (1-0 L

700

LU nU-V)

<Ld Ld I¸ Q.0 V)

0.

D LUv L..

Page 42 of 153 I

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

l 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I3/4.11.2.5 VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT CONTROLS I 3.11.2.5 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.g.6, the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM for the Reactor Building and the Service and Radwaste Building shall be OPERABLE and the appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce release of radioactivity when the projected dose in 31 days due to gaseous effluent releases from each unit to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see Figure 5.1. 1-1), would exceed:

a. 0.2 mrad to air for gamma radiation, or

b. 0.4 mrad to air for beta radiation, or

c. 0.3 mrem to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With radioactive ventilation exhaust being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that includes the following information:

Vj)

Z 1. Identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the

< inoperability, 1< 2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and V) 3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.

0" SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.5.1 Doses due to gaseous releases from each unit to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM, when the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM is not I being' fully utilized.

S 4.11.2.5.2 The installed VENTILATION EXAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be considered o OPERABLE by meeting CONTROLS 3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3.

0I n_.

C/)

L.

(w)

Page 43 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS S 3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING CONTROLS 3.11.2.8 VENTING or PURGING of the Mark I containment drywell shall be through either the reactor building ventilation system or the filtration, recirculation and ventilation system.*

APPLICABILITY: whenever the containment is vented or purged.

ACTION:

a. With the requirements of the above CONTROL not satisfied, suspend all VENTING and PURGING of the drywell.

b. The provisions of CONTROL 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLAINCE REQUIREMENTS 4.11.2.8 The containment shall be determined to be aligned for VENTING or PURGING through either the reactor building ventilation system, the filtration, recirculation and ventilation system, or S the hardened torus vent within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months prior to the start of and at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months during VENTING or PURGING of the drywell.

(/)

Ud zd 0

0 0

I.

z*

ro

Following Type A Integrated Leakage Rate Testing, the Mark I containment drywell may be vented through the hardened torus vent.

U.-

1,1 0*

U-Y U,

0 z

0 r)

U] >

0 Page 44 of 1153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS

'3/4.11.41TOTAL DOSE CONTROLS 3.11.4 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specification s 6.8.4.g. 11, the annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC due to releases of radioactivity and radiation from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrem to the total;body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 APPLICABILITY: At all times ACTION:.

a. With:the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of CONTROLS 3.11.4.2a, 3.11.1.2b, 3.11.2.2a, 3.11.2.2b, 3.11.2.3 a, or 3.11.2.3b, calculations should be made including direct radiation contributions from the units and including outside storage tanks, etc. to determine whether the limits of CONTROL 3.11.4 have been exceeded. If such is the case, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2,. a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be'taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes theschedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Reportm.as defined in 10 CFR Part 20.405c, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that 0- includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure z levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the V) release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190 and 10 CFR 72.104. Submittal of C) :the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the'request is complete.

I b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

_ 4.11.4.1 Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in

accordance with CONTROLS 4.11.1.2, 4.11.2.2, 4.11.2.3, and in accordance with the methodology

> and parameters in the ODCM.

0 L- 4.11.4.2 Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from the reactor units including L" outside storage tanks, etc. shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters M 1 in the ODCM. This requirement is applicable only under conditions set forth in CONTROL 3.11.4, I0 ACTION a.

.n Page 45 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I

3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS 3.12.1. In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h. 1, the radiological "

environ'ental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 31.2.1-1.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a. With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.12.1-1, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report required by Technical Specification 6.9.1.6, a description of the reasons for nOt conducting the program as required and'the plans for preventing a recurrence.

b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental

-,,,sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.12A-2 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies theccause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective

actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to

: a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of CONTROLS 0*' , 3.11.1.2, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. When more than one of the radionuclides in Table Sz 3.12.1-2 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if:

z* concentration (1) concentration (2)

+ 1.0

reportinglevel (1) reporting level (2)

Whenriadionuclides other than those in Table 3.12.1-2 are detected and are te result

of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose *to a

___ MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from all radionuclides is equal to or greater than the

> calendar year limits of CONTROLS 3.11.1.2, 3.1 f.2.2, and 3.11.2.3. This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents;

0 however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Z_ Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.

ry *The methodology used to estimate the potential annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC oshall 0 be'indicated in this report.

0

Page46 of 153

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING I1 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM CONTROLS (Continued)

ACTION: (Continued)

c. With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.12.1-1, identify specific locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from the monitoring program. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7 and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).

d. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS I. 4.12.1 The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 0

3.12.1 -1 from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCM, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.12.1-1, and the detection capabilities required by Table 4.12.1-1.

F-C-)

0 Li U-0 Z

I.J Page 47 of 153

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

-...TABLE 3.12.1-1: RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS (1) FREQUENCY

1. DIRECT RADIATION (2) Forty-nine routine monitoring Quarterly Gamma dose quarterly stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows:

An inner ring of stations one in each land based meteorological sector (not bounded by water) in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY;

- - An outer ring of stations, one in each land-based meteorological sector in the 5 to 11 -kin range from the site (not bounded by or over water); and The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby 7 residences, schools, and -in one or two areas to serve as control stations.

The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable. Local site characteristics must be examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sample program.

Page 48 of 153

-~~~~~~- iiMW _ - I

-ý__

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS () FREOUENCY

2. AIRBORNE Radioiodine and Particulates Samples from 6 locations: Continuous sampler Radioiodine Canister 1-131 operation with sample analysis weekly.

collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading.

Four(4) Samples - One sample from Particulate Sampler Gross beta close to the SITE BOUNDARY radioactivity analysis following location and Three (3) samples in filter change (3);

land based sectors of a high calculated annual average ground D/Q One sample from the vicinity of a Gamma isotopic analysis(41 of community having,a high calculated composites (by location) annual average ground- level D/Q; quarterly.

and One sample from a control location, as for example 15-30 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction.

Page 49 of 153

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES U ,a Hope Creek ODCM Rev.- 23 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATIIWAY NUMBER OFREPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS() FREOUENCY

3. WATERBORNE

a. Surface(5 ) One -sample upstream. Grab sample monthly Gamma isotopic analysis(4)

One sample downstream monthly. Composite for tritium One sample outfall analysis quarterly.

Onesample cross-stream 4

b. Ground Samples from one or two sources Monthly Gamma isotopic analysis{ )

only if likely to be affected"7 ). monthly and tritium analysis quarterly.

c. Drinking (10) One sample of the nearest water Composite sample over 1-131 analysis on each supply affected by its discharge two-week period(6) when I- composite when the dose 131 analysis is performed; calculated for the consumption monthly composite of the water is greater than 1 otherwise. mrem per year(8 . Composite for gross beta and gamma isotopic analysis(4) monthly Composite for tritium analysis quarterly 4

d. Sediment One sample from downstream area Semiannually Gamma isotopic analysis( )

One sample from cross-stream area semiannually

.One sample from outfallarea One sample from upstream area One sample from a control location One sample from shoreline area One sample from Cooling Tower Blowdown Page50 of 153

IU USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTAIVE SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION OF ANALYSIS LOCATIONS () FREQUENCY

4. INGESTION

a. Milk Samples from milking animals in Semimonthly when animals Gamma isotopic (4)and 1-131 three locations within 5 km distance are on pasture, monthly at analysis semi-monthly when having the highest dose potential. If other time animals are on pasture; monthly there are none, then, one sample at other times from milking animals in each of three areas between 5 to 8 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than I mrem per yrs.

One sample from milking animals at a control location 15 to 30 km distant.

b. Fish and Invertebrates One sample of each commercially Sample in season, or Gamma isotopic analysis(4) on and recreationally important species. semiannually if they are not edible portions.

in vicinity of plant discharge area seasonal One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge.

Page 51 of 153

USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES V wq Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Cont'd)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF SAMPLING AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE REPRESENTAIVE COLLECTION:- OFANALYSIS .

SAMPLES AND SAMPLE FREQUENCY LOCATIONS ()

c. Food Products One sample of each principal At time of harvest (9) Gamma isotopic analysis (4) on class of food products from any edible portion.

area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged r "

Pageý52 of 153

-I- - - - -M -M

- - - --- m - - - - - i

Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23

-TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)

TABLE NOTATIONS (1) Specific parameters of distance and direction sector from the midpoint of a line between the center of the Salem units 1& 2 containment domes. and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 3.12.1 -1 in a table and figure(s) in the ODCM. Refer to NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Reg.

Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, and other legitimate reasons. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period.

Alldeviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In these instances suitable specific alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway I

V6.9.1.7, inquestion and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program given in the ODCM. Pursuant to CONTROL submit in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report documentation for a change in the ODCM including revised figure(s) and table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s) with supporting information identifying the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and justifying the selection of the new location(s) for obtaining

y monitoring station in the outer ring due to inaccessibility.

" (3) Airborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radioactivity 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months 
-J or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate is greater than ten times the yearly mean of control samples, 0 gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples.
__ Page 53 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 (4) Gamma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility.
TABLE 3.12.1-1 (Continued)
TABLE NOTATIONS (5) The "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone.. "Upstream" samples in an estuary must be taken far enough upstream to be beyond the plant influence. Saltwater shall be sampled only when the receiving water is utilized: for recreational activities.
(6) A composite sample is one in which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquidand in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short relative to the compositing period in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.
(7) Groundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for o contamination.
< (8) Thedose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and agegroup, using-the o 'methodology and parameters in the ODCM. Additionally, 2 sample locations are CZ' monitored as management audit. Broad leaf vegetation may be obtained in lieu of milk
< 'collections.
(9) If harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during each discrete
'harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall'be paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products. The Delaware River at the
. location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No
) "irrigation of food products is performed using Water in the vicinity from which.liquid plant wastes have been discharged. However, :12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations.
(10) No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However for management audit, one raw and one treated ground water sample from the nearest o unaffected water supply is required.
V) 0k "L
LU LU Page 54 of 153
- 0I_.*
USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Ww Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 3.12.]1-2: REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES REPORTING LEVELS Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products, Analysis pi/l) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/l) (pCi/Kg, wet)
H-3 3x10 Mn-54 1 x 103 3 x 10' Fe-59 4 x 102 1x 104 Co-58 1 x1 3 x 10' Co-60 3 x 102 1 x 104 2
Zn-65 3 x 10 2 x 104 Zr-Nb-95 4 x 102 1-131 2* 0.9 31 x 102 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 10 3 60 1 x 103 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 10 3 70 2 x 103 Ba-La-140 2 x 102 3 x 102 For drinking water samples. This is a 40 CFR Part 141 value. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 20 pCi/I may be used.
Page 55 of 153
USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES U S Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 4.12.1- 1: DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOk ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSISl)'(2 ) .
LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD) (3)
Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCi/I) or Gases (pCi/m3) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet) (pCi/Kg, dry) gross 4 0.01 beta H-3 3000 Mn-54 . .15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 1-131 1* 0.07 1 60 Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15
LLD for drinking water samples. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 10 pCi/l may be used.
Page 56 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I* TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Continued)
TABLE NOTATIONS (1) This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.
(2) Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide
4.13.
(3) The'LLD is defined, for purposes of these CONTROLS as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.
For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation:
I 4.6 6 *Sb LLD E *JV *2.22E6*Y *exp(-A.At)
I.0 Where:
LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as picocuries per unit mass
() or volume, 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, I"w 0 X-is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec'), and
-j Z
P At for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection, or end of the sample collection period, and time of counting (sec).
W. .Typical values of E, V, Y, and At should be used in the calculation.
ry Page 57 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
S TABLE 4.12.1-1 (Continued) I TABLE NOTATIONS I
It'should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an g riri (before the fact). limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the:'fact) limit. for, a particular measurement. Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the I
stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes the presence of interfering nuclides, or other I
uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable. In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6. I I
I S I (I) w 0
z C-)
0 b_
U-l LU1
-J --,
o V-0U Cr) Page 58 of 153 r
1'
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23
.O RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS CONTROLS 3.12.2. In accordance with the Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.2, a land use census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden* of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) producing broad leaf vegetation.
APPLICABILITY: At all times.
ACTION:
a. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in CONTROL 4.11.2.3, identify the new location(s) in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report, pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7.
b. With a land use census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose I
onew commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with CONTROL 3.12.1, add the location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The
- sampling location(s), excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated I< dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this
-monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census was conducted. Pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.7, identify the new location(s) in the next
< Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and V) table for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).
< c. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable.
0" SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS
'y 4.12.2 The land use census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per 12 months I* using that information that will provide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, visual survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities. The results of the land use census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.
0 *Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegetation may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/Q's in lieu of the garden census. CONTROLS for broadleaf vegetation sampling in Table 3.12.1-1, Part 4.c shall be
p followed, including analysis of control samples.
z
.Page 59.of 153 D
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING I
3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM I CONTROLS 3.12.3 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.8.4.h.3, analyses shall be performed on I
radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program.
APPLICABILITY: At all times.
I ACTION: I
a. With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.
I
b. The provisions of CONTROLS 3.0.3 are not applicable. :I SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS, I
S I W 4.12.3 The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCM. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROL 6.9.1.6.
z z0 D
Vi)
H-(_9 w
0 U,,-
na 0
r,
(-I)
Page 60 of 153 Ci-) 1
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 S
BASES FOR SECTIONS 3.0 AND 4.0 CONTROLS AND S SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 0
z NOTE
(/3 C)
The BASES contained in the succeeding pages summarize
z I,
0 the reasons for the CONTROLS of Sections 3.0 and 4.0, but are not considered a part of these CONTROLS.
al 0
V-U-
0D z.
0 LU ILU 0-. Page 61 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION S BASES I 3/4.3.7.10 RADIOACTIVE LIQUID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION I The radioactive liquid, effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents.
The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the I
methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.
I 3/4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION I The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance I
with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. This will ensure the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent!
with the requirements of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50.
I z
V) 0 LU
.-1 z.
CD L i.
<J 0
z 0 1 7'3 z..
LUJ C-CD LLJ ILU
-J*
Page 62 of 153
£i
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23
'. 3/4.11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES I 3/4.11.1 LIQUID EFFLUENTS I 3/4.11.1.1 CONCENTRATION This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste efflu6its to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be lessthan the concentration levels specified'in 10
CFR Part 2ýpAppendix B, Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the
_. levels of radiloyactivemnaterials inbodies 0fwa~ter in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will eutnexposures I within (1) the Section 11A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OFiTHE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of 10 CFR Part 20.106(a) to the population. The concentrationlimit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is based upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the controlling I
radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 2.
I The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in.terms..,
of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed.Positionfor I t Radiological Effluent and Environmenta l Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 (September 1984), and the..
W HASL Procedures ManualHASL-300 (revised annually).
I O 3/4.11.1.2DOSE U This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, andIV.A of Appendix...
aM I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section IIA of Appendix I. The .
< ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility. and at the same time implement the guides (A set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid
effluents. to UJNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." Also, for (ifreshwater sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plat operations, there is I _
reasonabl.e asurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the.
finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculation,.
methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of.Apipendix I U that conformance with the guides of Appendix 1be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate. pathways is
unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the S.~
___ doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials in liquideffluents are consistent with the I
methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from*Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 0 I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purposes of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977.
A.
_ i
iPage 63 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES 3/4.11.1.3 LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT The OPERABILITY of the liquid Radwaste treatment system ensures that this system will be available for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to their release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides Assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable".
This CONTROL implenients the requirements of GeneraliDesign Criterion60 'of Appendix A 'to'10 CFR Part 50 and the desiin objective given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the Use of appropriate portionis.(f the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives'set forth the Section II.A of Appendix , 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluenit.-'
3/4.11.2 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 3/4.11.2.1 DOSE RATE This CONTROL is provided to ensure that the dose' at'any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from allunits on the site will be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 to UNRESTRICTED AREAS e annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance tihat radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure ' a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Lw in an UNRESTRICTED AREA either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average z concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 [10 CFR Part M 20.106(b)]. For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of the individual will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase int the z atmosphericdiffision factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such.
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC with the appropriate o0cupancy factors shall be given in the ODCM. The specified release rate limints restrict, at all times, thecorresponding gamma and-beta dose rates above background to aMEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to'less than Or equal C/. to 500 mrem/year to the total body or to less than or equal to 3000 mreniyr to the skin. These release rate z limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid'dose rate above background to a child via the inhalationp~athway to less than or equal toý 1500 mremlyear.
~
d to TereqauairedJ~ti~a iy alessthan e ....
The requiredt deteteion capabilitieS for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples 'aretabulated' in terms o of thelower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detectioni limits can be;
- found iii Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Positioin for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements," NIUREG/CR-4007 (September.1984), and the
> HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually).,'.
0 U-0 LJ.
Q:ý r* Page 64 of 153
_ _ _ __l
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I O BASES 3/4.11.2.2 DOSE - NOBLE GASES This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.B, III.A and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROL implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV,.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology I provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCM equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions.
I I 3/4.11.2.3 DOSE - IODINE-131, IODINE-133, TRITIUM, AND RADIONUCLIDES IN (I)
PARTICULATE FORM I 0 This CONTROL is provided to implement the requirements of Section II.C, III.A and IV.A of Appendix
-, 1, 10 CFR Part 50. The CONTROLS are the guides set forth in Section ll.C of Appendix 1. The ACTION statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that:the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to I0 UNRERSTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCM calculational methods specified in Surveillance Requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models V) and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is z unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The ODCM calculational methodology and parameters for
_ calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the
> methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine r" Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I,"
I C Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1.111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport
>- and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, E July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical I> average atmospheric conditions. The release rate controls for iodine-131,' iodine-133, tritium, and ry radionuclides in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days are dependent on the existing 0
radionuclide pathways to man, in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. The pathways that I were examined in the development of these calculations were: 1) individual inhalation of airborne I radionuclides, 2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by V W man, 3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat producing animals graze with EL (V,)
consumption of the milk and meat by man, and 4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man, ry Page 65 of 153
D
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS SBASES 3/4.11.2.4 AND 3/4.11.2.5 GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT AND VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT The OPERABILITY of the GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREAMENT SYSTEM ensures that the system will be available for usewhenever gaseous effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This CONTROL implements the requirements of General Design Criterion 60,of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, and the design objectives given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.B and ll.C of Appendix 1, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents.
3/4.11.2.8 VENTING OR PURGING This CONTROL provides reasonable assurance that releases from dryweUl venting or purging operations will not exceed the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 for UNRESTRICTED AREAS.
3/4.11.4 TOTAL DOSE This CONTROL is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have now been incorporated Sinto 10 CFR Part 20 by 46 FR 18525 as well as the dose limitations specific to Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) operations in accordance with 10 CFR 72.104. Over the long term, as more storage casks are placed on the ISFSI pads, it is expected that ISFSI operations will become the prominent contributor to the 0 dose limits in this section. ISFSI dose contribution is in the form of direct radiation as no liquid or gas releases
< are expected to occur. The PSEG 10 CFR 72.212 Report prepared in accordance with 10 CFR 72 requirements 5 assumes a certain array of casks exists on 'the pads. The:dose contribution*f'om this array of casks in C combination with historical uranium fuel cycle operations prior to ISFSI operations was'analyzed to be within z7 S the 40 CFR 190 and 10 CER 72.104 limits. The CONTROL requiires the preparation- and submittal of a Special Report whenever the calculated doses from plant including the ISFSI radioactive effluents exceed 25 mrem to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited:to less than or equal to 75 torem. For sites containing up to 4 reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC 0 will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within twice the dose design
~ objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor units including outside storage tanks,
0 etc. are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of
> the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CER Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 limits. For O purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible, with the exception that dose contributions from z other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered. If the dose to
>-* any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR S 72.1,04, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation
> of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of Co 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 and 10 CFR Part20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills 0
the requirements of 40 CFRPart 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 until NRC staff action is completed. The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190 or 10 CFR 72.104, and does not apply in any way to the other 9 , requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in CONTROLS 3.11.1.1 and 3.11.2.1. An V) individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period'in which he/she is engaged in C) carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle.
0 ctf Page 66 of 153 wi
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES 3/4.12.1 MONITORING PROGRAM The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this CONTROL provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the station operation. This monitoring program implementsSection IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.
Guidance for this monitoring program is provided by the Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Position on Environmental Monitoring, Revision 1, and November 1979. The initially specified monitoring program will be effective for at least the first three years of commercial operation. Following this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience.
The required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLDs required by Table 4.12.1-1 are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as I
an a nriori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.
o Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in Currie, L. A., "Lower Limit of 0< Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed(September Position for1984),
Radiological and the Effluent Environmental Measurements," NUREG/CR-4007 and HASL Procedures Manual, U HASL-300 (revised annually).
< 3/4.12.2 LAND USE CENSUS This CONTROL is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE 0 BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door survey, 0 from aerial survey, from visual survey or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This 22 census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50m 2 provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy I vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption by a
>-child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: 1) 20% of the I garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) a
> vegetation yield of 2 kg/m 2 .
0 Ii, U-
.1+/-
a:2^.Page 67 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
S 3/4.12 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING I
BASES 3/4.12.3 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM I The requirement for participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for I
environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of:AppendixI to 10 CFR Part 50.
I I
I 1
0 LO a I w
C-)
0 tLd 60
.0 i
Z rY 0
w
-J
_.1 0
a_
cL 0
w, Page 68 of 153 0
D'
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
Ij SECTION 5.0 DESIGN FEATURES I
I I
I _:
I_-)
I F-Ld l-MwU-0 LJ
-ii Page 69 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
5.0 DESIGN FEATURES (Provided FOR INFORMATION ONLY. Technical Specifications Section 5.0 is controlling.)
5.1 SITE MAP DEFINING UNRESTRICTED AREAS AND SITE BOUNDARY FOR RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS 5.1.1 Information regarding radioactive gaseous and liquid effluents which will allow identification of structures and release points as well as definition of UNRESTRICTED AREAS within the SITE BOUNDARY that are accessible to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, shall be as shown in Figure 5.1. 1-1.
I
<I LJ -
oZI C-)
0 z2*
I 0
Cn- I.
Page 70 of 153
.L-
['
I Ie FIGURE 5.1.1-1 AREA PLOT PLAN OF SITE
~~./~
I,
.- .. I -. ..
L~J I-U, I
Iz
-I
"'I
/'.1 V) LLJ M
1~.
V.)
-I
0 2ý I (y-I' 0
Li I,
0 zn C-)
0 w.t 0
__j 0i
'4 I
zj I
PaeU 71 RIVER Page 71 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.6 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 6.9.1.6 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.9.1.6, The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report* covering the operation of the unit during the previous calendar year, I shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year.
The Annual'Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, with operational controls (as appropriate), and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation on the environment. The reports shall also include the results of land use censuses required by CONTROL 3.12.2. If harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage are detected by the monitoring, the report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to alleviate the problem.
The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summarized and tabulated results in the format of Reg. Guide 4.8 as amended by Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979, for all of the radiological environmental samples taken during the report period pursuant to the table and figures in the environmental radiation section of the ODCM.
Deviations from the sampling program identified in CONTROL 3.12.1 shall be reported. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible S in a supplementary report.
The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; at least two legible maps, one covering sampling locations near the SITE
BOUNDARY and a second covering the more distant locations, all keyed to a table giving distances and directions from midpoint of a line between the center of the Salem units I & 2 containment domes.; the Z results of licensee participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, as required by CONTROL
. 3.12.3 and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 4.12.1-1 was not achieved.
<t The report shall also include the results of specific activity' analS'sis in which the primary coolant 0 exceeded the limits of Technical Specification 3.4.5. The *following information shall be included: (1) *
£ Reactor power history starting 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months prior to the first sample in which the limit was exceeded; (2) 0 Results of the last isotopic analysis for radioiodine performed prior to exceeding the limit, results of
~ analysis while limit was exceeded and results of one analysisafter the radioiodine activityto
-less than the limit. Each result should include dateand time of sampling and the radioiodine
.... concentrations; (3) Clean-up system flow history starting 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months prior to the first sample in which the
>7 limit was exceeded; (4) Graph of the 1-131 per gram as a function of time for the duration of the specific

activity of the steady-state level; and (5) The time duration when the specific activity of the primary
> coolant exceeded the limit.
0I "a
A single submittal may be made for a multiple unit site. The submittal should combine those
_1 sections that are common to all units at the site.
0 Page 72 of 153 0F
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 6.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT 6.9.1.7 In accordance with Hope Creek Technical Specifications 6.9.1.7, The Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report* covering the operation of the unit, shall be submitted by May 1 of each year and in accordance with: the requirements of 10CFR50.36a.
I The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quantities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21..
"Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof.
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorological data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured) on magnetic I tape, or in the form ofjoint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability. The report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. The report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS I OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (Figure 5.1.1-1) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments, i.e., specific activity, exposure time and location, shall be included in these reports. The historical annual average meteorology or the meteorological conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents (as determined by sampling frequency and measurement) shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the OFFSITE 0 DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).
I The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall identify those radiological environmental sample parameters and locations where it is not possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In addition, the cause of the unavailability of samples for the pathway and the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples should be identified. The report should also include a revised figure(s) and table(s) for the ODCM reflecting the new location(s).
I~ The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources (including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation) for the previous calendar I0)
Z year to showlconformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation and 10 CFR 72.104 Criteria for Radioactive Materials in Effluents and Direct Radiation from an ISFSI. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1.109, Rev. 1, October 1977.
z ~The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include the following information for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period:
a. Container volume,
b. Total curie quantity (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate),
0 c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate),
U- d. Type of waste (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, evaporator bottoms),
e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large Quantity), and vj f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde)..
aV
- Page 73 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS I
6.9.1.7 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued)
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report
shall include a list of descriptions of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made I
during the reporting period.
The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include any changes made during the reporting period to I
the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP), the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), or radioactive waste systems. Also list new locations identified by the land use census pursuant to CONTROL 3.12.2. for dose calculations or environmental monitoring.
I I
A single submittalrmay be made for a'multiple unit station. The submittal should combine those sections that are common to all units at the station; however, for units with separate radwaste systems, the submittal shall specify the releases of radioactive material from each unit. I VI)
0 F
0 i-)
0 C/)
LU Ld Vi) Page 74 of 153 D
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS I 6.15 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS 6,15.1 Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste system (liquid, gaseous and solid):
1. Shall be reported to the Commission in the UFSAR for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the Plant Operations Review Committee (PORC). The discussion of each change shall contain:
a. A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in accordance with 10CFR50.59;
b. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information;
c. A detailed description of the equipment, components and processes involved and the interfaces with other plant systems;
d. An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;
e. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to
individual in the unrestricted area and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;
f. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive materials, in liquid and gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made;
g. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and
h. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the
. : PORC.
.2. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the PORC.
0
-S Page 75 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
I PART U - CALCCULATIONAL METHODOLOGIES I
I I
I t
I Z
z I
D 0
LI ry u0
.0L"
D U--
0 w
<£ LJ zz LJ V
.V F
L Page 76 of 153
D
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I O 1.0 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Hope Creek for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Hope Creek Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications are summarized as follows:
(1) Alarm (and Automatic Termination) - Liquid Radwaste Discharge Line Monitor provides the alarm and automatic termination of liquid (RE4861) radioactive material releases from the liquid waste management system as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10.
Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Monitor (RE4557) provides alarm and automatic termination of liquid radioactive releases from the circulating dewatering sump as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10. Condensation drains from certain supply ventilation units and liquids from the fill and venting of the circulating water side of the condenser waterboxes are directed to this sump. Automatic termination is performed by trip of the sump pumps on high gamma radiation signal.
(2) Alarm (Only) - The Cooling-Tower Blowdown Effluent Monitor (RE8817) provides an Alarm function only for releases into the environment as required by CONTROL 3.3.7.10.

Liquid radioactive waste flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation and controls are presented in Figure 1-1.
(j/)
1.2 Liquid Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination Per the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.10, alarm setpoints shall be established for the Z liquid monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release concentration limits of
< CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are met (i.e., the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10
< CFR 20 Appendix B. Table II, Column 2, (Appendix F) for radionuclides and 2.OE-04 I *pCi/mI for dissolved or entrained noble gases). The following equation (adopted from zNUREG-0133) must be satisfied to meet the liquid effluent restrictions:
> C(F+ ""
I ~ where:
U-C = the effluent concentration limit of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 implementing the 10 CFR 20
-y MPC (Appendix F) for the site, in pCi/mi.
c=c the setpoint, in pCi/ml, of the radioactivity monitor measuring the radioactivity I concentration in the effluent line prior to dilution and subsequent release; the setpoint, m arepresents a value which, if exceeded, would result in concentrations exceeding the 0 limits of 10 CFR 20 in the UNRESTRICTED AREA.
C'v Page 77 of-. 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 f = the flow rate at the radiation monitor location, in volume per unit time, but the same I
F =
units as F, below.
the dilution water flow rate as measured prior to the release point, in volume per I unit time.
[Note that if no dilution is provided, c < C. Also, note that when (F) is large compared to (f), I then (F + f) = F.]
1.2.1 Liquid Effluent Monitors I
The setpoints for the liquid effluent monitors at the Hope Creek Generating Station are determined by the following equation: I SP* MPCe
CTBD
I
< *RR (1.2) I with:
I ZC(gamma)
MPCe = . ,
Mci (gamma)
,MPCI
. (1.3) I where:
I SP MPce
=
=
alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate (tCi/ml).
an effective MPC value for the mixture of radionuclides in the effluent stream, I
(*L( Ci/m .).
C1 MPCi
=
=
the concentration of radionuclide in the liquid effluenit (pCinil).
the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from, (Appendix F) 10 CFR I
20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (J.LCi/ml).
z CTBD=
RR, the Cooling-Tower Blowdown Discharge rate at the time of release (gal/min).
the liquid effluent release rate (gal/min)! at the monitor location (i.e., at the I
L_9 Lj liquid radwaste monitor, at the TBCW monitor, or at the CTBD monitor).
<C bkg the background of the monitor (pLCf/ml).
0i.) CF = Correction factor to account for non-gamma emitting nuclides and radiation monitor inaccuracies.
The radioactivity monitor setpoint equation (1.2) remains valid during outages when the Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge is potentially at its lowest value. Reduction of the r" waste stream flow (RR) may be necessary during these periods to'meet the discharge criteria.
z Procedural restrictions prevent simultaneous batch liquid releases. The setpoints should be a-(_9I reduced to allow for potential or actual concurrent continuous releases such that the limits of 0-. ODCM CONTROL 3.11.1.1 are not exceeded.
--I Page 78 of 153 D
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 1.2.2 Conservative Default Values
@ Conservative alarm setpoints for liquid radwaste radiation monitors may be determined through the use of default parameters. Table 1-1 summarizes all current default values in use for Hope Creek. They are based upon the following:
(a) substitution of the effective MPC value with a default value of 4.09E-05 ýtCi/ml for radwaste releases (Refer to Appendix A for justification);
(b) substitutions of the Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate with the minimum average flow, in gal/min; and, (c) substitutions of the effluent release rate with the highest allowed rate, in gal/min.
(d) substitution of a 0.8 correction factor (CF) to account for monitor inaccuracies and non-gamma emitting radionuclides.
The use of the conservative alarm setpoint, or a setpoint below the conservative value, is acceptable provided that the value used is at least as conservative as the release specific setpoint calculated in accordance with Equation 1.2 above. Procedural controls exist to verify the setpoint utilized is at or below what is required.
I .* 1.3 Liquid Effluent Concentration Limits - 10 CFR 20 CONTROL 3.11.1.1 limits the concentration of radioactive material in liquid effluents (after dilution in the Cooling-Tower Blowdown Discharge System) to less than the concentrations
<as specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) for radionuclides
-r- other than noble gases. Noble gases are limited to a diluted concentration of 2.OE-04 +/-tCi/ml.
Release rates are controlled and radiation monitor alarm setpoints are established as addressed above to ensure that these concentration limits are not exceeded. However, in the
< event any liquid release results in an alarm setpoint being exceeded, an evaluation of compliance with the concentration limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.1 maybe performed using the 1I following equation:
1< R1 (1.4)
> MPC5 CTBD + RR C_ where:
Ci actual concentration of radionuclide i as measured in the undiluted liquid
> effluent (p.Ci/ml).
ry 0 MPCi the MPC value corresponding to radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, 0 Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F) (ptCi/ml).
,w~ - 2E-04 p.Ci/ml for dissolved or entrained noble gases.
1 RRR = the actual liquid effluent release rate (gal/min) i WCTBD = the actual Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge at the time of release
©n (gal/min).
Page 79 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 1.4 Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation - 10 CFR 50 I
1M4.1 MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC Dose - Liquid Effluents I
CONTROL 3.11.1.2 limits the dose or dose commitment to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents from Hope Creek Generating Station to:
I
- during any calendar quarter:
,5 1.5 mrem to total body I
< 5.0 mrem to any organ
- during any calendar year:
I
< 3.0 mrem to total body
10.0 mrem to any organ I Per the surveillance requirements to CONTROL 4.11.1.2, the following calculation methods shall be used for determining the dose or dose commitment due to the liquid radioactive effluents from Hope Creek.
I 8.35E-44VOL:
(1.5)
I CTBD jZG*I 0O IP where: I C)
D, Aio
=
dose or dose commitment to organ o, including total body (mrem).
site-related ingestion dose commitment factor'to the total body or any organ o 41 0: for radionuclide i (mrem/hr per ptCi/ml).
7 Ci VOL =
average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of volume VOL (pCi/ml).
volume of liquid effluent released (gal).
I z"
CTBD =
8.35EE- 04
'Average Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate during release period
= (gal/min).
conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min) and a near field dilution factor of 0.05
'I 0a. (refer to Appendix B for definition).
ii II cLu Lu
-7 0
0-0 Lu 0-Page 80 of 153 0-LU 0
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 The site-related ingestion dose/dose commitment factors (Aia) are presented in Table 1-2 and I. have been derived in accordance with NUREG-0133 by the equation:
A&, = 1.14E+05 [(UI
BIi) + (UF
BFI)] Df1 o (1.6) where:
A1 = composite dose parameter for the total body or critical organ o of an adult for radionuclide i, for the fish and invertebrate ingestion pathways (mrem/hr per
ýCi/ml).
1.14E+05= conversion factor (pCi/4.Ci
ml/kg per hr/yr).
U! adult invertebrate consumption (5 kg/yr).
Bii bioaccumulation factor for, radionuclide i in invertebrates from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/1).
UF adult fish consumption (21 kg/yr).
B=f bioaccumulation factor for nuclide i in fish from Table 1-3 (pCi/kg per pCi/l).
Dfio dose conversion factor for nuclide i for adults in preselected organ, o, from Table E- 1I of Regulatory Guide 1.109 (mrem/pCi).
The radionuclides included in the periodic dose assessment per the requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.1.2 are those as identified by gamma spectral analysis of the liquid waste samples collected and analyzed per the requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.1.1, Table 4.1 1.i.1.1-1.
Radionuclides requiring radiochemical analysis (e.g., Sr-89 and Sr-90) will be added to the dose analysis at a frequency consistent with the' required minimum analysis frequency of CONTROL Table 4.11.1.1.1-L:
1.4.2 Simplified Liquid Effluent Dose Calculation In lieu of the individual radionuclide dose assessment as presented in Section 1.4.1, the LIJ following simplified dose calculation equation may be used for demonstrating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2. :(Refer to Appendix B for the derivation and justification for this simplified method.)
Total Body Dtb = 1.94E + 02
VOL, C CTBD (1.7)
LU Maximum Organ U-5.28E + 02
VOL *
.0 (1.8)
CTBD -
r-1+/-J Page 81 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 where:
Dtb = conservatively evaluated total body dose (mrem).
Dr 0 = evaluated maximum organ dose (mrem).
Ci =average concentration of radionuclide i, in undiluted liquid effluent representative of the volume VOL (pCi/ml).
VOL volume of liquid effluent released (gal).
CTBD average Cooling-Tower Blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min).
1.94E+02 = conversion factor, (1.67E-2 hr/min), the conservative total body ingestion dose commitment factor (Zn-65 = 2.32E+5 mrem/hr per IiCi/ml), and the near field dilution factor of 0.05. (See Appendix B) 5.28E+02 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min), the conservative maximum organ ingestion dose commitment factor (Fe-59, GI-LLI -6.32E+5 mrem/hr. per .Ci/ml), and the near field dilution factor of 0.05 (See Appendix B).
1.5 Liquid Effluent Dose Projections CONTROL 3.11.1.3 requires that the liquid radioactive waste processing system be used to reduce the radioactive material levels in the liquid waste prior to release when the 31-day projected doses exceed:
0.06 mrem to the total body, or
- 0.2 mrem to any organ.
The applicable liquid ,waste processing system for maintaining radioactive material releases 0ALARA are the drain filters and demineralizers as delineated in Figure 1-1.
-7 iL z o ~Dose projections are made at least once per 31-days by the following equations:,
Dtbp (Dtb /d)
31d (1.9) t/)
Dmaxp (D.max/d).* 31d (1.10) _
zwhere:
-Dtbp the
.W Dtb =
= the total total body body dose dose projection to date for for current current 31-dayquarter calendar periodas(mrem).
determined by o Dmaxpequation (1.5) or (1.7).
Dmaxp the maximum organ dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by {
equation (1.5 or (1.8) (mrem).
> d = the number of days in current calendar quarter at the end of the release.:
3ld = the number of days of concern. i 0
7-Page 82 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 O* 1.6 Representative Samples A sample should be representative of the bulk stream or volume of effluent from which it is taken. Prior to sampling, large volumes of liquid waste should be mixed in as short a time interval as practicable to assure that any sediments or particulate solids are distributed uniformly in the waste mixture. Recirculation pumps; for liquid waste tanks (collection or sample test tanks) should be capable of recirculating at a rate of not less -than two tank volumes in eight hours. Minimum recirculation times and methods of recirculation are controlled by specific plant procedures.
2.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 2.1 Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation and Controls The gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation and controls at Hope Creek for controlling and monitoring normal radioactive material releases in accordance with the Radiological Effluent CONTROLS are summarized as follows:
(1) Filtration, Recirculation, and Ventilation System -
U The FRVS is maintained in a standby condition. Upon reactor building isolation, the FRVS recirculation system recirculates the reactor building air through HEPA and charcoal filters. Releases are made to the atmosphere via a reactor building vent or the South Plant Vent depending on mode of operation. Noble gas monitoring is
)provided by RE-4811A.
< (2) South Plant Vent -
The SPV receives discharge from the radwaste evaporator, reactor building purge,
< auxiliary building radwaste area, condensate demineralizer, pipe chase, feedwater heater, and untreated ventilation sources. Effluents are monitored (for noble gas) by I<the RE-4875B monitor.
(3) North Plant Vent -
The NPV receives discharge from the gaseous radwaste treatment system (Offgas system) and untreated ventilation air sources. Effluents are monitored (for noble gases) by the RE-4573B monitor.
Gaseous radioactive waste flow diagrams with the applicable, associated radiation monitoring instrumentation controls are presented in Figures 2-1 and 2-2.
Page 83 of 153 1+/-
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
2.2 Gaseous Effluent Monitor Setpoint Determination 2.2.1 Plant Vent, FRVS I Per the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.11, alarm setpoints shall be established for the gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation to ensure that the release rate of noble gases I does not exceed the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1, which corresponds to a dose rate, at the SITE BOUNDARY of, 500. mrem/year, to the total body or 3000 mrem/year to the skin.
Based on a grab sample analysis of the applicable release (i.e., of FRVS, pipe chase, gaseous I radwaste treatment system air, etc.), the radiation monitoring alarm setpoints may be I
established by the following calculation method. The measured radionuclide concentrations and release rate are used to calculate the fraction of the allowable release rate, as limited by CONTROL 3.11.2.1, by the equation:
FRAC=[4.72E+02*Z**VF*Z 0 J7n (2.1)
I FRAC=[4.72E+02*Z O*VF*clII,- (2.2) 3 I
where:
FRAC= fraction of the allowable release rate based on the identified radionuclide I
concentrations and the release flow rate.
LU X/Q annual average meteorological dispersion to the controlling site boundary location i i 0 (sec/m3).
V)
VF ventilation system flow rate for the applicable release point and monitor (ft3/min).
z Ci = concentration of noble gas radionuclide i'as determined by radioanalysis of grab F--
sample (uCi/cm3) 0 V)
Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per L
L.tCi/m3), from Table 2-1
= beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per "iCi/m3), from Table 2-1 I
Mi = gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per ptCi/m3), from Table-2-1 1.1 = mrem skin dose per mrad gamma air dose (mrem/mrad) 4.72E+02 = conversion factor (cm3/ft3
min/sec) 0 500 = total body dose rate limit (mrem/yr) 3000. skin dose rate limit (mrem/yr)
LLU
z 0 Based on the more limiting FRAC (i.e., higher! value) as determined above, the alarm f 0,- setpoints for the applicable monitors-may be calculated by the equation

LUJ SP.* [' 0cI/FPAC]+ bkg (2.3)
I.LU 0
0 Page 84 of 153 t
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 where:
I SP = alarm setpoint corresponding to the maximum allowable release rate.(ýtCi/cc).
FRAC = highest fraction of the allowable release rate as determined in equation (2.2).
bkg = background of the monitor (tCi/cc).
AF = administrative allocation factor for the specific monitor (0.2 NPV, 0.2 SPV, 0.1 FRVS).
The allocation factor (AF) is an administrative control imposed to ensure that combined releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will not exceed the regulatory limits on release rate from the site (i.e., the release rate limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1). Normally, the combined AF value for Salem Units 1 and 2 is 0.5 (0.25 per unit), with the remainder 0.5 allocated to Hope Creek. Any increase in AF above 0.5 for the Hope Creek Generating Station will be coordinated with the Salem Generating Station to ensure that the combined allocation factors for all units do not exceed 1.0.
2.2.2 Conservative Default Values A conservative alarm setpoint can be established, in.lieu of the individual radionuclide evaluation based on the grab sample analysis, to eliminate the potential of periodically having to adjust the setpoint to reflect minor changes in radionuclide distribution and variations in release flow rate. The alarm setpoint may be conservatively determined by the default values presented in Table 2-2.
I.
These values are based upon:
I7 -
the maximum ventilation (or purge) flow rate; a radionuclide distribution adopted from ANSI N237- 1976/ANS '18.1 "Source Term Specifications", Table 5 and;
- an administrative allocation factor of 0.5 to conservatively ensure that any releases from Hope Creek do not exceed the maximum allowable release rate.
For the noble gas radionuclide distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANS 18.1 (Note Table n* C-l), the alarm setpoint based on the total body dose rate is more restrictive than the 7£ corresponding setpoint based on the skin dose rate. The resulting conservative, default I 5 setpoints are presented in Table 2-2.
c 2.3 Gaseous ýEffluent Instantaneous Dose Rate Calculations - 10 CFR 20 I - 2.3.1 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Noble Gases I> CONTROL 3.11 .2.1a limits the dose rate at the SITE BOUNDARY due to noble gas releases 0:ý to < 500 mrem/yr, total body and < 3000 mrem/yr, skin. Radiation monitor alarm setpoints 0,. are established to ensure that these release limits are not exceeded. In the event any gaseous I ~ releases from the station results in an alarm setpoint (as determined in Section 2.2.1) being
exceeded, an evaluation of the SITE BOUNDARY dose rate resulting from the release shall be performed using the following equations:
SLLI re Page 85 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Deb~ (2.4)
D (2..5.)
where:
Dtb total body dose rate (mrem/yr). I D, -skin dose rate (mrem/yr).
X/Q atmospheric'dispersion to -the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (seclm3).I Q = average release rate of radionuclide i over the release period under evaluation (gCi/sec).
Ki = total body dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCii/m3), from Table 2-1 Li = beta skin dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per pCi/m3), from Table 2-1 Mi *= gamma air dose conversion factor for noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per PtCi/m3, from Table 2-1.
1.1 mrem skin dose per mrad gamma afrcdose (mrem/mr'ad)
As appropriate, simultaneous releases from Salem Units 1 and 2 and Hope Creek will be considered in evaluating compliance with the release rate limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a, V) following any releases exceeding the above prescribed alarm setpoints. Monitor indications do (readings) may be averaged over a time period not to exceed 15 minutes when determining Z noble gas release rate based on correlation of the monitor reading and monitor sensitivity.
o The 15-minute averaging is needed to allow for reasonable monitor response to potentially changing radioactive material concentrations and to exclude potential electronic spikes in
< moniitor readings that may' be unrelated to radioactive material releases. As identified, any V) electronic spiking monitor responses may be excluded from the analysis.
V)NOTE: For administrative purposes, more conservative alarm setpoints than those as prescribed above; may be imposed. :"However, conditions exceeding these more limiting Z alarm setpoints do not necessarily indicate radioactive material release rates exceeding the,
_ dos* limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1a. Provided actual releases do not result in radiation monitor indications exceeding alarm setpoint values based on the above criteria, no further analyses are required for demonstrating compliance with the limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.1 a.
_ Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period or the default, annual average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3 may be used for, evaluating the gaseous effluent dose rate.
0 k_m 0
c* - Page 86 of 153v
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 2.3.2 Site Boundary Dose Rate - Radioiodine and Particulates CONTROL 3.11.2.lb limits the dose rate to < 1500 mrem/yr to any organ for 1-131, 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days. To demonstrate compliance with this limit, an evaluation is performed at a frequency no greater than that corresponding to the sampling and analysis time period (e.g., nominally once per 7 days). The following equation shall be used for the dose rate evaluation:
IDO=V/Q*~E iR49 7 (2.6) where:
Do = average organ dose rate over the sampling time period (mrem/yr).
X/Q = atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location for the inhalation pathway (sec/m3).
Rio dose parameter for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per 4Cilm3) and organ o for the Ichild
=
Q inhalation pathway from Table 2-4.
average release rate over the appropriate sampling period and analysis frequency for radionuclide i - 131, 1-133, tritium or other radionuclide in particulate form with half- life greater than 8 days (.tCi/sec).
I By substituting 1500 mrem/yr for Do and solving for Q, an allowable release rate for 1-131 can be determined. Based on the annual average meteorological dispersion (See Table 2-3) and the most limiting potential pathway, age group and organ (inhalation, child, thyr6id -- Ri
= 1.62E+07 mrem/yr per ýiCi/m3), the allowable release rate for 1-131 is 34.7 tCi/sec.
I
c Reducing this release rate by a factor of 2 to account for potential dose contributions from other: radioactive particulate material and other release points (e.g., Salem), the corresponding release rate allocated to Hope Creek is 17.4 PCi/sec. For a 7-day period, which is the nominal sampling and analysis frequency for - 31, the cumulative release is 10.5 Ci.
Therefore, as long as the 1-131 release in any 7-day period do not exceed 10.5 Ci, no additional analyses are needed for verifying compliance with the CONTROL 3.11.2.1.b Iz limits on allowable release rate.
> 2.4 Noble Gas Effluent Dose Calculations - 10 CFR 50 I 2.4.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Noble Gases i* .CONTROL 3.11.2.2 requires a periodic assessment of releases of noble gases to evaluate
> compliance with the quarterly dose limits'of < 5 mrad, gamma-air and < 10 mrad, beta-air and the calendar year limits < 10 mrad, gamma-air and < 20 mrad, beta-air.
The limits are applicable separately to each generating station and are not combined site IR limits. The following equations shall be used to calculate the gamma-air and beta-air doses:
Page 87 of 153 ry!
m Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 DY=3.17EO8*ZQ*Z " (2.7)
D4=3.17E:--08*Z * :(2.8) where:
r air dose due to gamma emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad).
Dr *= air dose due to beta emissions for noble gas radionuclides (mrad). II XIQ atmospheric dispersion to the controlling SITE BOUNDARY location (sec/m3).
Qi = cumulative release. of noble., gas; radionuclide i overý the period of -interest
. ~ ~~~~~~~(JLci). " .. . . . .,, -
Mi - air dose factor due to gamma emission from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per p.Ci/m3, from Table 2-1.
Ni air dose factor due to beta emissions, from noble gas radionuclide i (mrad/yr per ItCi/m3,.Table 2-1).
3.17E-08 conversion factor (yr/sec).
2.4.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Noble Gases In lieu of the individual noble gas radionuclide dose assessment as presented above, the V) following simplified dose calculation equations maybe used for verifying compliance with U" the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.2 (Refer to Appendix C,for the derivation and z justification of this simplified method).
z 3.17E,88-......%.- __, :'
3.7-8y (2.9) 0.50 IQ f*Q 5-8 --- ,
D"8 3.17E
_ _ *./ Nf , (2.10)
> where: 'I:
z r
aMvre d 8.r1eE+03, effective a gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per eCi/m3).ui o 0
tNhfe 8.5E+03, effective beta-air .Ci/m3).
dose factor (srad/yr per
*. Qi ..=cumulative release for. aU noible gas radionuclides (ICi)..
..*> 0.50* conservatism,
_-_ ... variability in the radionuclide":
factor to,.account. for potential t distribution. ,**
.:,.t..I. Actual meteorological conditions concurrent with*;he release period, or.the. default,- annual .
D .~average dispersion parameters as presented in Table 2-3, may be used for the evaluation of -
0 "
zV1 the gamma-air and beta-air doses.
ryr LLL Page 88 of 153
-I-0
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 2.5 Radioiodine and Particulate Dose Calculations - 10 CFR 50 2.5.1 UNRESTRICTED AREA Dose - Radioiodine and Particulates In accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.11.2.3, a periodic assessment shall be performed to evaluate compliance with the quarterly dose limit < 15 mremto any organ. The following equation shall be used to evaluate the maximum organ dose due to release-of 1-131, I 1-133, tritium and particulates with half-lives greater than 8 days:
D op= 3.17E-08*W*St*Z-' (2.11)
I i where:
Daop = dose or dose commitment via all pathways p and age group a (as identified in Table 2-3) to organ o, including the total body (mrem).
W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location(s) as identified in Table 2-3.
X/Q = atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway and H-3 dose contribution via other pathways (sec/m3).
D/Q = atmospheric deposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways (1/m2).
Ria = dose factor for radionuclide i (mrem/yr per j.tCi/m3 or m2 - mrem/yr per ýtCi/sec) and organ o from Table 2-4 for each age group a and the applicable pathway p as identified in Table 2-3. Values for Riaop were derived in accordance with the methods described in NUREG-0 133.
Qi =cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131, 1-133, H-3
-r"or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (gCi).
0 Sf = annual seasonal correction factor to account for fraction of the year that the applicable exposure pathway does not exist.
(1) Formilk and vegetation exposure pathways:
= A six month fresh vegetation and grazing season (May through October)= 0.5 0(2) For inhalationand ground plane exposure pathways:
U)= 1.0
For evaluating the maximum exposed individual, the infant age group is controlling for the milk pathway.. Only the controlling age group and exposure pathways as identified in Table
>.- 2-3 need be evaluated for compliance with CONTROL 3.11.2.3.
> 2.5.2 Simplified Dose Calculation for Radloiodines and Particulates
. 0:
I WIn lieu of the individual radionuclide (1-131, 1-133 and particulates) dose assessment for the
b resident/dairy location as presented above, the following simplified-dose calculation equation 00_ may be used for verifying compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.3 (Refer to 0 Appendix D for the derivation and justification of this simplified method):
Page 89 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
Dmx0 = 3.17E-O8*W*SPp *Pj-131*~
S where:
(2.12)
I Dmax o = maximum organ dose (mrem).
Qi.m =- 1-131 dose parameter, for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway.
= 1.05E+12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the cow-milk pathway controlling W
(m2 - mrem/yr per pCi/sec).
= D/Q for radioiodine, 2.87E-10 l/m2.
I Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radionuclide i -- 1-131 or radioactive material in particulate form with half-life greater than 8 days (tCi). I The location of exposure pathways and the maximum organ dose calculation may be based on the available pathways in the surrounding environment of Hope Creek as identified by the annual land-use census (CONTROL 3.12.2). Otherwise, the'dose will be evaluated based on I1 the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3.
2.6 Gaseous :Effluent Dose Projection CONTROL 3.11.2.4 requires that the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM be used to reduce radioactive material levels prior to discharge w~hen projected doses in 31-days ti exceed:.
- 0.2 mrad to airfrom gamma radiation, or
- 0.4 mrad to air from beta radiation, or I1 0.3 mrad to any organ of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC r
z The applicable gaseous processing systems for maintaining radioactive material releases ALARA Ia C- are the Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System and Exhaust Treatment System as delineated in
< Figures 2-1 and 2-2.
I
.D Dose proj ection are performed at least once per 31-days by the following equations:
Dgp = (Dg/d)
31d (2.13) ii 0
Ddp = (DA / d)
31d (2.14)
Dmaxp = (Da. / d)
31d (2.15) 0 z
where:
>. D = gamma air dose projection for current 3 1-day period (minrad).
= gammga air dose to date forI current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.7)
~Db or (2.9) (mrad).
= beta air dose projection for current 31-day period (mrad).
0
= beta air dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation (2.8) or (2.10) (mrad). -
0,
= maximum organ dose projection for current 3 1 -day period (mrem).
.L Df=
Page 90 of 153
02
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 S
Dmx = maximum organ(mrem).
(2.11) or (2.12) dose to date for current calendar quarter as determined by equation d = number of days in current calendar quarter at the end of the release.
31d the number of days of concern.
3.0 SPECIAL DOSE ANALYSIS 3.1 Doses:Due to Activities Inside the SITE BOUNDARY In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.7, the Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) submitted by May 1st of each year shall include an assessment of radiation doses from I radioactiveliquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY. b The calculation methods as presented in Sections 2.4 and 2.5 may be used for deternining the maximum potential dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC located inside the site boundary. For the purpose of this calculation, a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is an adult individual who is not subject to occupational exposure (i.e., an un-monitored site worker) performing duties within the site boundary, and who is exposed to radioactive material in gaseous effluent for 2,000 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months per year via the inhalation and ground plane exposure pathways. The values for the atmospheric dispersion coefficients at the point of interest inside the site boundary (e.g., 0.25 mile) shall be developed from the current year meteorological data.
I I 3.2 Total Dose to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC - 40 CFR 190 and 10 CFR 72.104 UJ The Radioactive Effluent Release Report (RERR) submitted by May 1st of each year shall also Iz include an assessment of the radiation dose to the likely most exposed-MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC
<for reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle courses (including dose contributions from effluents and direct radiation from on-site sources). For the likely most exposed MEMBER OF Hz THE PUBLIC in the vicinity of Artificial Island, the sources of exposure need only consider the Salem Generating station and the Hope Creek Generating Station which includes the Independent nSpent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI): No other fuel cycle facilities contribute to the MEMBER I* OF THE PUBLIC dose for the Artificial Island vicinity.
z" The dose contribution from the operation of Salem Generating Stations will be estimated based on 0_Q. the methods as presented in the Salem Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. (SGS ODCM).
As appropriate for demonstrating/evaluating compliance with the limits of CONTROL 3.11.4 I__
(40 CFR 190), the results of the environmental monitoring program may be used for providing data on actual measured levels of radioactive material in the actual pathways of exposure.
I ~ 3.2.1 Effluent Dose Calculations 0 For purposes of implementing the surveillance requirements of CONTROL 3/4.11.4 and the
w reporting requirements of 6.9.1.7 (RERR), dose calculations for the Hope Creek Generating Station
_ may be performed using the calculation methods contained within the ODCM; the conservation I controlling pathways and locations of Table 2-4 or the actual pathways and locations as identified 0 by the land use census (CONTROL 3/4.12.1) may be used. Average annual meteorological U3)
Page 91 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 dispersion parameters or meteorological conditions concurrent with the release period under
evaluation may be used.
3.2.2 Direct Exposure Dose Determination Any potentially significant direct exposure contribution to off-site individual doses may be evaluated based on the results of the environmental measurements (e.g., dosimetry, ion chamber measurements) and/or by the use of a radiation transport and shielding calculation method.
Only during a non-typical condition will there exist any potential for significant on-site sources at Hope Creek that would yield potentially significant off-sitedoses (iLe., in excess of 1 mrem per year to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC), that would require detailed evaluation for demonstrating compliance with 40 CFR 190 or ý10 CFR 72.104. However, should a situation exist whereby the direct exposure contribution is potentially significant, on-site measurements, off-site measurements and/or calculational techniques will be used for determination of dose for assessing 40 CFR 190 or 10 CFR 72.104 compliance.
4.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 4.1 Sampling Program The operational phase of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) is conducted in accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.12. The objectives of the program are:
- To determine whether any significant increases occur inithe concentration of radionuclides in the critical pathways of exposure in the vicinity of Artificial Island;
- To determine if the operation of the Hope Creek Generating Station has resulted in any increase in the inventory of long lived radionuclides in the environment;
- To detect any changes in the ambient gamma radiation levels; and CD - To verify that HCGS operations have no detrimental effects on the health and safety of the
-7 public or on the environment.
The sampling requirements (type of samples, collection frequency and analysis) and sample locations are presented in Appendix E. r zNOTE: No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are taken as these Generating Station.
0 4.2 Interlaboratory Comparison Program CONTROL 3.12.3 requires analyses be performed on radioactive material supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison. Participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program
"> provides a check on the preciseness of measurements of radioactive materials in environmental Q:ý samples. A summary of the Interlaboratory Comparison Program results will be provided in the 0 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report pursuant to CONTROLS 6.9.1.7.
_ 5.0 HCGS EXPLOSIVE GAS MONITORING PROGRAM The Hope Creek Explosive Gas Monitoring program was moved within the Hope Creek Technical o Specifications to section 6.8.4.d. This was performed in Technical Specification Amendment 91.
SDetails of the Hope Creek Explosive iGas Monitoring program are maintained in station
yacPage 92 of 153 0"
ýDF
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 imnplementing procedures and are controlled by the 50.59 safety evaluation and procedure I: processes.
FIGURE 1-1: LIQUID RADWASTE TREATMENT AND MONITORING SYSTEM I.
V)
(I)
I.0 Log: RE = Radiation Monitor RE 4861 = Liquid Radwaste Discharge Monitor
.RE 8817 = Cooling Tower Blowdown Monitor 0 RE 4557 = Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Discharge Monitor Note I Specified equipment is installed but not in use.
Equipment abandoned per DCP 4EC-3634 eL.
tI. FIGURE 1-2: SOLID RADWASTE PROCESSING SYSTEM Page 93 of 153
II Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
S See Note 1 I Note 1: Specified equipment is installed but not in use.
Equipment is pending abandonment per DCP 4EC-3534.
(.,
z z
V) 0
(,A w
0 z-,J z
L.)
wy 00 0,a- - V
-. 0 wL Page 94 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I* TABLE 1-1: PARAMETERS FOR LIQUID ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION Parameter Actual Default 1
_________ Valuea lulue Units.; Comments MPCe Cale 4.09E-05* tCi/ml Calculated for each batch to be released MPC 1-131 3.OE-07 N/A jiCi/ml Taken from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F)
C1 Measured N/A l.iCi/ml Taken from gamma spectral analysis of liquid effluent MPCI Measured N/A gCi/ml Taken from 10CFR20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F)
CTBD Measured 12000 gpm Cooling tower blowdown discharge RR Measured 176 gpm or Determined prior to release, release rate can be adjusted for CONTROL 1300 gpm(CST) compliance (11 gpm Maximum flow rate with both pumps Estimated *100 (TBCW) running (50 gpm each)
SP (Setpoints) __
A) RE4861 Calc 5.58E-04 ýjCi/ml Default alarm setpoints; more C-)
conservative values may be used as appropriate and desirable for ensuring regulatory compliance and for maintaining releases ALARA RE8817 Calc 8.18E-06 J.tCi/ml Maximum alarm setpoint continuous RE4557 Cale 2.40E-06 ptCi/ml release; more conservative value may be 0 established by plant procedure B) RE4861 Calc 7.55E-05 ptCi/ml These setpoints are for condensate storage tank releases RE8817 Cale 8.18E-06 LtCi/ml Ln *See Appendix A for basis 13 Page 95 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 1-2: SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Aio (FISH AND INVERTEBRATE CONSUMPTION)
.(rnremrhr per Ci/mi)
Nuld Bone t.oy Thri .i Kdes,
[ii t H-3 - 2.82E-1 ,2.82E-1 2.82E-1 2.82E'1 2.82E-1 2.82E-1 C-14 1.45E+4 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3, 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 2.90E+3 Na-24 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 4.57E-1 P-32 4.69E+6 2.91E+5 1.81E+5 - 5.27E+5 Cr-51i -5.58E+O 3.34E+O 1.23E+O 7.40E+O 1.40E+3 Mn-54 7.06E+3 1.35E+3 - 2.1OE+3 2.16E+4 Mn-56 -1.78E+2 3.15E+1 - 2.26E+2 5.67E+3 Fe-55 5.11E+4 3.53E+4 8.23E+3 - 1.97E+4 2.03E+4 Fe-59 8.06E+4 1.90E+5 ji7.27E+4 - 5.30E+4 6.32E+5 Co-57 1.42E+2 2.36E+2 - 3.59E+3 Co-58 6.03E+2 '1.35E+3 - 1.22E+4 Co-60 1.73E+3 '3.82E+3 - 3.25E+4 Ni-63 4.96E+4 3.44E+3 1.67E+3 - 7.18E+2 Ni-65 2.02E+2 2.62E+1 1.20E+1 - 6.65E+2 Cu-64 - 2.14E+2 1.01E+2 - 5.40E+2 1.83E+4 Zn-65 1.61E+5 5.13E+5 2.32E+5 - 3.43E+5 3.23E+5 Zn-69m 5.66E+3 1.36E+4 '.124E+3 8.22E+3 8.29E+5 As-76 4.38E+2 1.16E+3 5.14E+3 3.42E+2 1.39E+3 3.58E+2 4.30E+4 Br-82 - ,4.07E+0 - - 4.67E+0
([*Br-83 - - 7.25E-2 - - 1.04E-1 5 Br-84 - 9.39E-2 7.37E-7 z< Br-85 - 3.86E-3 - - - -
- Rb-86 - 6,24E+2 12.91E+2 t. 1.23E-2 Rb-88 - 1.79E+O 9.49E-1 - 2.47E-1 1 Z Rb-89 - 1.19E+O 8.34E-1 - - - 6.89E%14 Sr-89 4.99E+3 1.43E+2 t ..- - 8.OOE*2 D Sr-90 1.23E+5' - 3.01E+4 - - 3.55E+3 Sr-91, 9.18E+1 - 3.71E+40 --- 4.37E+2 V..Sr-92 3.48E+1 - 1.51E+0 --
- 6.90E+2 z Y-90 6.06E+0 - 1.63E-1 - - 6.42E+4 o Y-91m. 5.73E-2 2.22E-3 - . 1.68E-1
> Y-91 8.88E+1 - 2,37E+0 - - 4.89E+/-4 r" Y-92 5.32E-1 1.56E-2 -- 9.32E+3 0 Y-93 1.69E+O 4.66E-2 - - 5.35E+4 Zr-95 1.59E+1 5.11E+0 3.46E+0 8.02E+O - 1.62E+4
_ Zr-97 8.81E-1 1.78E-1 8.13E-2 . 2.68E-1 - 5.51E-44
Nb-95 4.47E+2 2.49E+2 1.34E+2 2.46E+2 - 1.51E+6
> Nb-97 3.75E+0 9.49E-I 3.46E-1 1.11E+O - 3.50E*3 c* Mo-99 1.28E+2 2.43E+1 2.89E+2 - 2.96E4,2 0
- Tc-99m 1.30E-2 3.66E-2 4.66E-1 - 5.56E-1 1.79E-2 2.17E+l S, Tc-101 1.33E-2 1.92E-2 1.88E-1 - 3.46E-1 9.81E-3 5.77E-14 L<1
.0
.n0_ Page 96 of 153 cw
D
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 1-2 (cont'd)
SITE RELATED INGESTION DOSE COMMITMENT FACTOR, Ajo (FISH AND INVERTEBRATE CONSUMPTION)
(=wA/hper. "Ci/ml Ru-103 1.07E+2 - 4.60E+1 - 4.07E+2 - 1.25E+4 Ru-105 8.89E+O - 3.51E+0 - 1.15E+2 - 5.44E+3 Ru-106 1.59E+3 - 2.01E+2 . .3.06E+3 - 1.03E+5 Ag-110m 1.56E+3 1.45E+3 8.60E+2 - 2.85E+3 - 5.91E+5 Sb-122 1.98E+1 4.55E-1 6.82E+0 3.06E-1 - I.19E+1 7.51E+3 Sb-124 2.77E+2 5.23E+O 1.10E+2 6.71E-1 - 2.15E+2 7.86E+/-3 Sb-125 1.77E+2 1.98E+0 4.21E+1 1.80E-1 - 1.36E+2 1.95E+3 Sb-126 1.14E+2 2.31E+O 4.10E+l 6.96E-1 6.97E+1 9.29E+3 Te-125m 2.17E+2 7.86E+1 2.91E+1 6.52E+1 8.82E+2 - 8.66E+2 Te-127m 5.48E+2 1.96E+2 6.68E+1 1.40E+2 2.23E+3 - 1.84E+3 Te-127 8.90E+0 3.20E+0 1.93E+0 6.60E+O 3.63E+1 - 7.03E+2 Te-129m 9.31E+2 3.47E+2 1.47E+2 3.20E+2 3.89E+3 - 4.69E+3 Te-129 2.54E+O 9.55E-1 6.19E-1 1.95E+0 1.07E+l - 1.92E+O Te-131mr 1.40E+2 6.85E+1 5.71E+1 1.08E+2 .6.94E+2 - 6.80E+3 Te-131 1.59E+0 6.66E-1 5.03E-1 1.31E+O 6.99E+0 - 2.26E-1 Te-132 2.04E+2 1.32E+2 1.24E+2 1.46E+2 1.27E+3 - 6.24E+3 I
1-130 3.96E+1 1.17E+2 4.61E+1 9.91E+3 1.82E+2 - 1.01E+2 1-131 2.18E+2 3.12E+2 1.79E+2 1.02E+5 5.35E+2 - 8.23E+1 UO 1-132 1.06E+l 2.85E+1 9.96E+0 9.96E+2 4.54E+1 - 5.35E+0
. 1-133 7.45E+1 1.30E+2 3.95E+1 1.90E+4 2.26E+2 - 1.16E+2
< 1-134 5.56E+O. 1.51E+l 5.40E+0 2.62E+2 2.40E+1 - 1.32E-2 1-135 2.32E+l 6.08E+1 2.24E+1 4.01E+3 9.75E+1 6.87E+1 Cs-134 6.84E+3 1.63E+4 1.33E+4 5.27E+3 1.75E+3 2.85E+2 z Cs-136 7.16E+2 2.83E+3 2.04E+3 - 1.57E+3 2.16E+2 3.21E+2 Cs-137 8.77E+3 1.20E+4 7.85E+3 4.07E+3 1.35E+3 2.32E+2 D Cs-138 6.07E+O 1.20E+l 5.94E+O 8.81E+ 8.70E-1 5.12E-5 Ba-139 7.85E+O 5.59E-3 2.30E-1 5.23E-3 3.17E-3 1.39E+1 Ba-140 1.64E+3 2.06E+0 1.08E+2 7.02E-1 1'18E+0 3.38E+3 zfa-141 3.81E+0 2.88E-3 1.29E-1 - 2.68E-3 1.63E-3 1.80E-9 0 Ba-142 1.72E+O 1.77E-3 1.08E-1 1.50E-3 1.OOE-3 2.43E-18 La-140 1.57E+O 7.94E-1 2.10E-1 ..- - 5.83E+4 SL~L-142 8.06E-2 3.67E-2 9.13E-3 - - 2.68E+2 Ce-141 3.43E+O 2.32E+O 2.63E-1 1.08E+O - 8.86E+3 Ce- 6.04E-1 4.46E+2 4.94E-2 1.97E-1 - 1.67E+4
'Ce-141.79E+2 7.47E+l 9.59E+0 4.43E+1 - 6.04E+4
'z Pr-143 5.79E+0 2.32E+0 2.87E-1 1.34E+0 - 2.54E+4 SPr-1 1.90E-2 7.87E-3 9.64E-4 4.44E - 2.73E-9 Nd-147 3.96E+0 4.58E+0 2.74E-1 2.68E+0 - 2.20E+4 W-187 9.16E+0 7.66E+0 2.68E+O - - 2.51E+3 n . Np-239 3.53E-2 3.47E-3 1.91E-3 1.08E-2 - 7.11E+2 V) Page 97 of 153 LU
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 1-3: BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS
(pCi/kg per pCi/liter)*
H 9.3E.01 C1.0-+03- 1.4E+03 Na 6.7E-02 .1.9E-01 P 3.OE+03 3.OE+04 Cr 4.OE+02 2,0E+03 Mn 5.5E+02 4.0E+02 Fe 3.OE+03 2.OE+04 Co 1.OE+02 '1.OE+03 Ni 1.OE+02 2.5E+02 Cu 6.7E+02 1.7E+03 Zn 2.OE+03 5.OE+04 Br 1.5E-02 .. 3.1 E+00 Rb 8.3E+00 1.7E+01 Sr 2.OE+00 2.OE+01 Y 2.5E+01;' 1.0E+03 Zr 2.OE+02 8.OE+01
....Nb 3.OE+04 *1.OE+02 Mo 1.OE-O1 '1.OE+01
TOE-O1 5.OE+01 Ru 3.OE+00 1.E+03
,,Rh 1.OE+01 2.OE+03 z Ag: 3.3E+03 3.3E+03
< Sb. :4.OE+01 5.4E+00 o Te 1.OE+01 1.OE+02 I .1.OE+01 5.OE+01
< Cs 4.OE+01 2.5E+01
Ba 1.OE+01 * .OE+02 La -2.5E+01 1.OE+03 Ce 1.OE+01 6.OE+02 Pr 2.5E+01 1.0E+03 z" Nd' :2.5E+01 1.OE+03 0
W : 3.OE+01 3.OE+01
> Np 1.OE+01 1.OE+01 ac As 3.3E+02 3.3E+02 0
Values in this table are taken from Regulatory Guide 1.109 except for phosphorus (fish) which is adapted from NUREG/CR-1336 and silver, arsenic and antimony which are taken from UCRL
> ý50564, Rev. 1, October 1972.
ý0 z° 0
V_ Page 98 of 153
USER RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING REVISION, STATUS AND CHANGES Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23
-FIGURE 2-1: GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM Page 99 of 153
I I
S Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
FIGURE 2-2: VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM I
Gaseous Radwaste Treatment System (from Figure 2-1)
I Untreated Ventilation Air Sources I
S LLJ 0
z z
Z
!1 V)
(from Figure 2-1) - - - -Building Reactor - --- --- --- - --- -
R Ventilation Exhaust System:
H
!1
.0 z
or) 0 Reactor Building Air
//' I ! I
(
Typical of 3)41A
~FINS Recite System FR" V...F/E/ent....
~I SI FRVSSystemVent
.- (Typical of 8) (Typical of 2) z R = Roughing Filter H = HEPA Filter U- C = Charcoal Filter RE = Radiation Effluent Monitort U- Note 1: Specified equipment is Installed but not Inuse.
Equipment pending abandonment per DCP 4EC-3634.
ED, 0
F)
U-
-J LLJ z Page 100 of 153 I
V)
.0 Q-1 LJ
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 2-1: DOSE FACTORS FOR NOBLE GASES Total Body Skin Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Ki Li Mi Ni Radionuclide itCi/m3) C itCi/m3) m3 Kr-83m 7.56E-02 - 1.93E+01 2.88E+02 Kr-85n 1.17E+03 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+0.
Kr-85 1.61E+01 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6.17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.01E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 S Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 V)
Xe-131m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 Xe-133m 2.51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03
< Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m: 3.12E+03 7.11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 V)
Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 0
.)
Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9.21E+03 4.75E+03 7-Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03 0
W.
ýn- Page 101 of-153 z
0
,n y.
wy
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE 2-2: PARAMETERS FOR GASEOUS ALARM SETPOINT DETERMINATION I
S Actual Default I
Parameter Value Value.- Units Comments X/Q Calculated 2.14E-6 sec/m3 From FSAR Table 2.3-31, 0.5 mile, N I VF (NPV) .Measured 441900 Maximum OperationI f/min 440,180 Maximum Operation [
VF (SPV) Measured VF (FRVS) Measured 9000 ft3 /min Maximum Operation I AF (NPV) Coordinated with SGS 0.2 Unitless Administrative allocation factor to ensure I releases do not exceed AF (SPV) 0.2 Unitless release rate limit I
AF (FRVS) 0.1 Unitless CQ Measured N/A ./Ci/cm3 I 03
Ll S Nuclide Specific N/A mrem/yr per .tCi/m 3
Table 2-1 I
w Nuclide N/A ! mrem/yr Table 2-1 Specific per pCi/mr)
I--
V) Nuclide N/A mrad/yr Table 2-1 ..
CD Specific per ptCi/m3
<- SP: NPV Calculated 2.43E-4 ptCi/cc Default alarm Setpoints; F L<
SPV Calculated 2.31E-5 jiCi/cc more conservative values'
.0 FRVS Calculated 5.65E-4 p.Ci/cc may be used as deemed 0U--- appropriate for ensuring ALARA & regulatory' compliance 0
Ld_
c-(-Y
[
0 0
Page 102 of 153 0
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I. TABLE 2-3: CONTROLLING LOCATIONS, PATHWAYS AND ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION FOR DOSE CALCULATIONS*
ODCM CONTROL Location Pathway(s) Age Group (sec/m3) (1/m2) 3.11.2.1a Site Boundary Noble Gases N/A 2.14E-06 N/A 0.5 Mile, N direct exposure 3.11.2.2 Site Boundary Gamma-Air N/A 2.14E-06 N/A 0.5 Mile, N Beta-Air 3.11.2.3 Residence/ Milk, ground Infant 7.2E-08 2.87E-10 Dairy - 4.9 plane and Miles, W inhalation The identified controlling locations, pathways and atmospheric dispersion are from the Artificial Island Radiological Monitoring Program and the Hope Creek FSAR.
Is I! V-)
(D U-0 V)
Ld wy Page 103 of 153
-I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4: Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases, R(io)
I S Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per gCi/m3) ki 1H,3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 1.26E+3 C-14 1.82E+4 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 3.41E+3 P-32 1.32E+6 7.71E+4 - - - 8.64E+4 5.01E+4 Cr-51 - 5.95E+1 2.28E+1 1.44E+4 3.32E+3 1.OOE+2 Mn-54 3.96E+4 - 9.84E+3 1.40E+6 7.74E+4 6.30E+3 Fe-55 2.46E+4 1.70E+4 - - 7.21E+4 6.03E+3 3.94E+3 Fe-59 1.18E+4 2.78E+4 - 1.02E+6 1.88E+5 1.06E+4 Co-57 - 6.92E+2 - - 3.70E+5 3.14E+4 6.71E+2 Co-58 1.58E+3 - - 9.28E+5 1.06E+5 2.07E+3 Co-60 1.15E+4 - 5.97E+6 2.85E+5 1.48E+4 Ni-63 4.32E+5 3.14E+4 - 1.78E+5 1.34E+4 1.45E+4 Zn-65 3.24E+4 1.03E+5 -. 6.90E+4 8.64E+5 5.34E+4 4.66E+4 Rb-86 1.35E+5 - - 1.66E+4 5.90E+4 Sr-89 3.04E+5 -- 1.40E+6 3.50E+5 8.72E+3 Sr-90 9.92E+7 - 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.10E+6 Y-91 4.62E+5 - 1.70E+6 3.85E+5 1.24E+4 Zr-95 1.07E+5 3.44E+4 5.42E+4 1.77E+6 1.50E÷5 2.33E+4 I. Nb-95 1.41E+4 7.82E+3 7.74E+3 5.05E+5 1.04E+5 4.21E+3 (A3 Ru-103 1.53E+3 - .5.83E+3 5.05E+5 1.10E+5 6.58E+2 Ru-106 6.91E+4 - 1.34E+5 9.36E+6 9.12E+5 8.72E+3 z Ag- 10m Sb-124 1.08E+4 3.12E+4 1.00E+4 5.89E+2 7.55E+1 1.97E+4 4.63E+6 2.48E+6 3.02E+5 4.06E+5 5.94E+3 1.24E+4 I Sb-125 5.34E+4 5.95E+2 5.40E+1 - 1.74E+6 1.01E+5 1.26E+4 Te-125m Te-127m 3.42E+3 1.26E+4 1.58E+3 5.77E+3 1.05E+3 3.29E+3 1.24E+4 4.58E+4 3.14E+5 9.60E+5 7.06E+4 1.50E+5 4.67E+2 1.57E+3 I
0. Te-129m 9.76E+3 4.67E+3 3.44E+3 3.66E+4 1.16E+6 3.83E+5 1.58E+3 1-131 2.52E+4 3.58E+4 1.19E+7 6.13E+4 - 6.28E+3 2.05E+4 VA 1-132 1.16E+3 3.26E+3 1.14E+5 5.18E+3 - 4.06E+2 1.16E+3 (A 1-133 8.64E+3 1.48E+4 2.15E+6 2.58E+4 - 8.88E+3 4.52E+3 (D
z" 1-134 6.44E+2 1.73E+3 2.98E+4 2.75E+3 - 1.O1E+O 6.15E+2 Z 1-135 2.68E+3 6.98E+3 4.48E+5 1.11E+4 - 5.25E+3 2.57E+3 0
Cs-134 Cs-136 3.73E+5 3.90E+4 8.48E+5 1.46E+5 2.87E+5 8.56E+4 9.76E+4 1.20E+4 1.04E+4 1.17E+4 7.28E+5 1.1OE+5 II Cs-137 4.78E+5 6.21E+5 - 2.22E+5 7.52E+4 8.40E+3 4.28E+5 Ba-140 3.90E+4 4.90E+1 - 1.67E+1 1.27E+6 2.18E+5 2.57E+3 Ce-141 1.99E+4 1.35E+4 - 6.26E+3 3.62E+5. 1.20E+5 1.53E+3
(-A Ce-144 3.43E+6 1.43E+6 - 8.48E+5 7.78E+6 8.16E+5 1.84E+5 Pr-143 9.36E+3 3.75E+3 2.16E+3 2.81E+5 2.OOE+5 4.64E+2 w
0 f'Y~
LL cV-Nd-147 5.27E+3 6.1OE+3
- 3.56E+3 2.21E+5 - 1.73E+5 3.65E+2 I oD w
r-(A Page 104 of 153
II Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
I I10 Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - TEENAGER (mrem/yr per ýtCi/m3)
H-3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 11.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 1.27E+3 C-14 2.60E+4 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 4.87E+3 P-32 1.89E+6 1.1OE+5 - 9.28E+4 7.16E+4 Cr-51 - - 7.50E+1 3.07E+l 2.1OE+4 3.OOE+3 1.35E+2 Mn-54 - 5.11E+4 - 1.27E+4 1.98E+6 6.68E+4 8*40E+3 Fe-55 3.34E+4 2.38E+4 1.24E+5 6.39E+3 5.54E+3 Fe-59 1.59E+4 3.70E+4 ,:- 1.53E+6 1.78E+5 1.43E+4 Co-57 - 6.92E+2 -5.86E+5 3.14E+4 9.20E+2 Co-58 : 2.07E+3 1.34E+6 9.52E+4 2.78E+3 Co-60 - 1.51E+4 8.72E+6 2.59E+5 1.98E+4 Ni-63 5.80E+5 :4.34E+4, - 3.07E+5 1.42E+4 1.98E+4 Zn-65 3.86E+4 1.34E+5 8.64E+4 1.24E+6 4.66E+4 6.24E+4 Rb-86 - 1.90E+5 - 1.77E+4 8.40E+4 Sr-89 4.34E+5. - - - 2.42E+6 3.71E+5: 1.25E+4 Sr-90. 1.08E+8- - - 1.65E+7 7.65E+5 6.68E+6 Y-911 6.61E+5 - 2.94E+6 4.09E+5 1.77E+4 "I- Zr-5 1.46E+5 4.58E+4 - 6.74E+4 2.69E+6 1.49E+55 3.15E+4 I. Nb-95ý'
Ru-103 1.86E+4 2.10Et3 1.03E+4 1.OOE+4 7.43E+3 7.51E+5 7.83E+5 9.68E+4 1.09E+5 5.66E+3 8.96E+2 Ru-106 9.84E+4 - 1.90E+5 1.61E+7 9.60E+5 1.24E+4 Ag-110m 1.38E414 1.31E+4 2.50E+4 6.75E+6 2.73E+5 7.99E+3 Sb-124 4.30E+4 7.94E+2 9.76E+1 3.85E+6 3.98E+5 1.68E+4 Sb-125 7.38E+4 8.08E+2 7.04E+1 2.74E+6 9.92E+4 1.72E+4 Te-125rn 4.88E+3 2.24E+3 1.40E+3 - 5.36E+5 7.50E+4 6.67E+2 Te-127m 1.80E+4 8.16E+3 4.38E+3 6.54E+4 1.66E+6 1.59E+5 2.18E+3 I_° Te-129rn 1-131 1-132" 1.39E+4 3.54E+4 1.59E+3 6.58E+3 4.91E+4 4.38E+3 4.58E+3 1.46E+7 1.51E+5 5.19E+4 8.40E+4 6.92E+3 1.98E+6 4.05E+5 6.49E+3 1.27E+3 2.25E+3 2.64E+4 1.588+3 1-133 1.22E+4 2.05E+4 2.92E+6 3.59E+4 1.03E+4 6.22E+3 1-134' 8.88E+2 2.32E+3 3.95E+4 3.66E+3 2.04E+l 8.40E+2 1-035 3.70E+3 9.44E+3 6.21E+5 1.49E+4 - 6.95E+3 3.49E+3
,Cs-134 5.02E+5 1.13E+6 - 3.75E+5 1.46E+5 9.76E+3 5.49E-5 Cs-136 5.1 5E+4 1.94E+5 - 1.10E+5 1.78E+4 1.09E+4 1.37E+5 0~ Cs-137 6.:70E÷5 8.48E+5 - 3.04E+5 1.21E+5 8.48E+3 3.11E+5 Ba-140 5.47E+4 6.70E+1 - 2.28E+l 2.03E+6 2.29E+5 3.52E+3 Uv-Ce-141 2.84E+4 L90E+4 - 8.88E+3 6.14E+5 1.26E+5 2.17E+3 0 Ce-144 4.89E+6 2.02E+6 - 1.21E+6 1.34E+7 8.64E+5 2.62E+5 (I-. Pr-143 1.34E+4 5.31E+3 - 3.09E+3 4.83E+5 2.14E+5 6.62E+2 U- Nd&147 7.86E+3 8.56E+3 5.02E+3 3.72E+5 1.82E+5 5.13E+2 Page 105 of 153 (11
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
I I Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD I (mrem/yr per jtCi/m3)
H-3 1.1 2E+3 1.12E+3 11.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 1.12E+3 I
C-14 3.59E+4 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 6.73E+3 P-32 Cr-51 2.60E+6 1.14E+5 8.55E+1 2.43E+1 1.70E+4 4.22E+4 1.08E+3 9.88E+4 1.54E+2 I
Mn-54, Fe-55 Fe-59 4.74E+4 2.07E+4 4.29E+4 2.52E+4 3.34E+4 1.OOE+4 1.58E+6 1.1 1E+5 1.27E+6 2.29E+4 2.87E+3 7.07E+4 9.51E+3 7.77E+3 1.67E+4, I
Co-57 - 9.03E+2 - 5.07E+5 1.32E+4 1.07E+3 Co-58 1-.77E+3 - 1.11E+6 3.44E+4 3.16E+3.
Co-60 - 1.31E+4 - 7.07E+6 9.62E+4 2.26E+4 Ni-63 8.21E+5 4.63E+4 - 2.75E+5 6.33E+3 2.80E+4-`
Zn-65 4.26E+4 1.13E+5 - 7.14E+4 9.95E+5 1.63E+4 7.03E-4 Rb-86 - 1.98E+5 - ,,7.99E+3 1.14E+5 Sr-89 5.99E+5 - , 2.16E+6 1.67E+5 1.72E+4, Sr-90 1.01E+8 - 1.48E+7 1- 3.43E+5 6.44E+6, Y-91 9.14E+5 - - 2.63E+6 1.84E+5 2.44E+4 Zr-95 Nb-95 1.90E+5 2.35E+4 4.18E+4 9.18E+3 -
5.96E+4 8.62E+3 2.23E+6 6.14E+5 6.11E+4 3.70E+4 3.70E-4 6.55E+3 I U3 Ru-103`ý 2.79E+3 - - 7.03E+3 6.62E+5 4.48E+4 1.07E+3 z
Ru-106 1.36E+5 - - 1.84E+5 1.43E+7 4.29E+5 1.69E+4, Ag-110n, 1.69E+4 1.14E+4 - 2.12E+4 5.48E+6 1.00E+5 9.14E+3
(_)
Sb-,124 5.74E+4 7.40E+2 1.26E+2 3.24E+6 1.64E+5 2.00E+4 z
H-- Sb-125 9.84E4-4 7.59E+2 9.1OE+1 - 2.32E+6 4.03E+4 2.07E+4 CO Te-125m 6.73E+3 2.33E+3 1.92E+3 - 4.77E+5 3.38E+4 9,14E+2 Te-127m 2.49E+4 8.55E+3 6.07E+3 6.36E+4 1.48E+6 7.14E+4 3.02E+3 D Te-129rn 1.92E+4 6.85E+3 6.33E+3 5.03E+4 1.76E+6 1.82E+5 3;04E+3 I-131C 4.81E44 4.81E+4 1.62E+7 7.88E+4 - 2.84E+3 2.73E+4 0 1-1321 2.12E+3 4.07E+3 1.94E+5 6.25E+3, - 3.22E+3 1.88E+3 1-133 1.66E+4 2.03E+4 3.85E+6 3.38E+4 - 5.48E+3, 7.70E+3 C-) 1-134 1.17E+3 2.16E+3 5.07E+4 3.30E+3 - 9.55E+2 9.95E+2 1-135 4.92E+3 8.73E+3 7.92E+5 1.34E+4 - 4.44E+3 4.14E+3 b-z Cs-134 6.51E+5 1.01E+6 - 3.30E+5 1.21E+5 3.85E+3 2.25E+5 !
t z*
q -
Cs-136 6.51E+4 1.71E+5 - 9.55E+4 1.45E+4 4.18E+3 1.16E+5 Cs-137, 9.07E+5 8.25E+5 - 2.82E+5 1.04E+5 3.62E+3 i.28E+5S CL Ba-140 7.40E+4 6.48E+1 2.11E+1 1.74E+6 1.02E+5 4.33E+3 r'Y 0.
w u- Ce-141 .392E+4 1.95E+4 8.55E+3 5.44E+5 5.66E+41 2.90E+3 w Ce-144 6.77E+6 2.12E+6 1.17E+6 1.20E+7 3.89E+5: 3.61E+5 Pr-143 1.85E+4' 5.55E+3 3.00E+3 4.33E+5 9.73E+4 9.14E+2 0
Nd-147 1.08E+4 8.73E+3 4.81E+3 3.28E+5 8.21E+4 6.81E+2 Page 106 of 153 I1 Cr-LD V.*)
11
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
I1 Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Inhalation Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT (mrem/yr per iLCi/m3)
H.3 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 I 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 6.47E+2 C-14 2.65E+4 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 5.31E+3 P-32: 2.03E+6 1.12E+5 - - 1.61E+4 7.74E+4 Cr-51 , - 5.75E+1 1.32E+l 1.28E+4 3.57E+2 8.95E+1 Mn-54 - 2.53E+4 - 4.98E+3 1.00E+6 7.06E+3 4.98E+3 Fe-55 1.97E+4 1.17E+4 - - 8.69E+4 1.09E+3 3.33E+3 Fe-59. 1.36E+4 2.35E+4 - 1.02E+6 2.48E+4 9.48E+3 Co-57 - 6.51E+2 - - 3.79E+5 4.86E+3 6.41E+2 Co-58 - 1.22E+3 - - 7.77E+5 1.11E+4 1.82E+3 Co-60 - 8.02E+3 - 4.51E+6 3.19E+4 1.18E+4 Ni-63 3.39E+5 2.04E+4 - - 2.09E+5 2.42E+3 1.16E+4 Zn-65 1.93E+4 6.26E+4 - 3.25E+4 6.47E+5 5.14E+4 3.11E+4 Rb-86 - 1.90E+5 - - 3.04E+3 8.82E+4 Sr-89 3.98E+5 - 2.03E+6 6.40E+4 1.14E+4 Sr-90 4.09E+7 -1.12E+7 1.31E+5 2.59E+6 Y-91 5.88E+5 - - 2.45E+6 7.03E+4 1.57E+4 Zr-95 1.15E+5 2.79E+4 3.11E+4 1.75E+6 I. Nb-95 Ru-103 1.57E+4 2.02E+3 6.43E+3 4.72E+3 4.24E+3 4.79E+5 5.52E+5 2.17E+4 1.27E+4 1.61E+4 2.03E+4 3.78E+3 6.79E+2 Ru-106 8.68E+4 - 1.07E+5 1.16E+7 1.64E+5 1.09E+4 Ag-ll0m 9.98E+3 7.22E+3 - 1.09E+4 3.67E+6 3.30E+4 5.00E+3 Vf)
Sb-124: 3.79E+4 5.56E+2 1.01E+2 - 2.65E+6 5.91E+4 1.20E+4 Sb-125, 5.17E+4 4.77E+2 6.23E+1 - 1.64E+6 1.47E+4 1.09E+4 0
Te-125m 4.76E+3 1.99E+3 1.62E+3' - 4.47E+5 1.29E+4 6.58E+2 V-) Te-127m 1.67E+4 6.90E+3 4.87E+3 3.75E+4 1.31E+6 2.73E+4 2.07E+3 Lj Te-129m 1-131 1.41E+4 3.79E+4 6.09E+3 4.44E+4 5.47E+3 1.48E+7 3.18E+4 5.18E+4 1.68E+6 6.90E+4 1.06E+3 2.23E+3 1.96E+4 1-132 1.69E+3 3.54E+3 1.69E+5 3.95E+5 - 1.90E+3 1.26E+3 1-133 1.32E+4 1.92E+4 3.56E+6 2.24E+4 - 2.61E+3 5.60E+3 1-134. 9.21E+2 1.88E+3 4.45E+4 2.09E+3 - 1.29E+3 6.65E+2 1-135 3.86E+3 7.60E+3 6.96E+5 8.47E+3 - 1.83E+3 2.77E+3 Cs-134: 3.96E+5 7.03E+5 - 1.90E+5 7.97E+4 1.33E+3 7.45E+4 U-Cs-136 4.83E+4 1.35E+5 - 5.64E+4 1.18E+4 1.43E+3 5.29E+4 Cs-137 5.49E+5 6.12E+5 - 1.72E+5 7.13E+4 1.33E+3: 4.55E+4 Ba-140 5.60E+4 5.60E+1 - 1.34E+l 1.60E+6 3.84E+4 2.90E+3 0
Ce-141 2.77E+4 1.67E+4 - 5.25E+3 5.17E+5 2.16E+4 1.99E+3 Ce-144, 3.19E+6 1.21E+6 - 5.38E+5 9.84E+6 1.48E+5 L76E+5 Pr-143: 1.40E+4 5.24E+3 1l.97E+3 4.33E+5 3.72E+4 6.99E+2 Nd-147 7.94E+3 8.13E+3 - 3.15E+3 3.22E+5 3.12E+4.- 5.00E+2 Page 107 of 153
h Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (c6nt'd) h Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yr per pCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 I
(m2
mrem/yr per p.Ci/sec) for others I
H-3 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 7.63E+2 C-14 P-32 3.63E+5 1.71E+10 7.26E+4 1.06E+9 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 7.26E+4 1-.92E+9 7.26E+4 6.60E+8 I
Cr-51 1.71E+4 6.30E+3 3.80E+4 7.20E+6 2.86E+4 I
Mn-54 - 8.40E+6 - 2.50E+6 - 2.57E+7 1.60E+6 Fe-55 2.51E+7 1.73E+7 - 9.67E+6 9,95E+6 4.04E+6 Fe-59 2.98E+7 7.O0E+7 - - 1.95E+7 2.33E+8 2.68E+7 Co-57 - 1.28E+6 - 3.25E+7 2.13E+6 Co-58 4.72E+6 - - 9.57E+7 1.06E+7 Co-60 - 1.64E+7 - 3.08E+8 3.62E+7 7Ni-63 6.73E+9 4.66E+8 -.. 9.73E+7 2.26E+8 Zn-65 1.37E+9 4.36E+9 - 2.92E+9 2.75E+9 1.97E+9 Rb-86 2.59E+9 - 5.11E+8, 1.21E+9 Sr-89 1.45E+9 - - - 2.33E+8 4.16E+7 Sr-90 4.68E+10 - - 1.35E+9 1.15E+10; Y-91 8.60E+3 - - 4.73E+6 2.30E+2 L)
S Zr-95 Nb-95 9.46E+2 8.25E+4 3.03E+2 4.59E+4
-4.76E+2 4.54E+4 9.62E+5 2.79E+8 2.05E+2 2.47E+4 Ru-1031 1.02E+3 - 3.89E+3 1.19E+5 4.39E+2 Ru-106: 2.04E+4 - - 3.94E+4 1.32E+6 2.58E+3 Ag-110m 5.83E+7 5.39E+7 1.06E+8 - 2.20E+10 3.20E+7 z Sb-124 2.57E+7 4.86E+5 6.24E+4 - 2.OOE+7 7.31E+8 1.02E+7 C-)
Sb-125 Te-125m 2.04E+7 1.63E+7 2.28E+5 5.90E+6 2.08E+4 I 4.90E+6 6.63E+7 1.58E+7 2.25E+8 6.50E+7 4.86E+6 2.18E+6 I
Te-127m 4.58E+7 1.64E+7 1.17E+7 1.86E+8 '- 1.54E+8 5.58E+6 0 Te-129m 6.04E+7 2.25E+7 2.08E+7 2.52E+8 - 3.04E+8 9.57E+6 z 1-131- 2.96E+8 4.24E+8 1.39E+11 7.27E+8 1.12E+8 2.43E+8 1-132 1.64E-1 4.37E-1 1.53E+1 6.97E-1 - 8.22E-2 1.53E-1 1-133 1-134 3.97E+6 6.90E+6 1.01E+9 1.20E+,7 6.20E+6 2.10E+6 I L-- 1-135 1.39E+4 3.63E+4 2.40E+6 5.83E+4 4.10E+4 1.34E+4 r.
0*
w0*
Cs-134 Cs-136 5.65E+9 2.61E+8 1.34E+10 1.03E+9 4.35E+9 5.74E+8 1.44E+9 7.87E+7 2.35E+8 1.17E+8 1.10E+10 7.42E+8 I
Lj 0 Cs-137c 7.38E+9 1.O1E+10 - 3.43E+9 1.14E+9 1.95E+8 6.61E+9 M0* Ba-140 Ce-141 2.69E+7 4.84E+3 3.38E+4 3.27E+3 1.15E+4 1.52E+3 1.93E+4 5.54E+7 1.25E+7 1.76E+6 3.71E+2 I1 V-W*
Ce-144 3.58E+5 1.50E+5 - 8.87E+4
& - 1.21E+8 1.92E+4 wý, Pr-143 1.59E+2 6.37E+1 - 3.68E+1 - 6.96E+5 7.88E+0 o__
0*- Nd-147: 9.42E+1 1.09E+2 - 6.37E+1 -l- 5.23E+5 6.52E+0 0
n Page 108 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (contfd)
I* Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - TEENAGER (mrem/yr per gCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
mrem/yr per g*Ci/sec) for others H-3 - 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 9.94E+2 C-14 6.70E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 1.34E+5 P-32 3.15E+10 1.95E+9 - - 2.65E+9 1.22E+9 Cr-51 - 2.78E+4 1.1OE+4 7.13E+4 8.40E+6 5.OOE+4 Mn-54 - 1.40E+7 - 4.17E+6 - 2.87E+7 2.78E+6 Fe-55 4.45E+7 3.16E+7 - 2.OOE+7 1.37E+7 7.36E+6 Fe-59: 5.20E+7 1.21E+8 - - 3.82E+7 2.87E+8 4.68E+7 Co-57 - 2.25E+6 - - - 4.19E+7 3.76E+6 Co-58 - 7.95E+6 - - 1.10E+8 1.83E+7 Co-60 - 2.78E+7 - 3.62E+8 6.26E+7 Ni-63 1.18E+10 8.35E+8 - - - 1.33E+8 4.01E+8 Zn-65 2.11E+9 7.3 1E+9 - 4.68E+9 - 3.10E+9 3.41E+9 Rb-86 - 4.73E+9 - 7.OOE+8 2.22E+9 Sr-89:. 2.67E+9 - 3.18E+8 7.66E+7 Sr-90: 9.92E+7 - 9.60E+6 7.22E+5 6.1OE+6 Y-91 1.58E+4 - - 6.48E+6 4.24E+2 Zr-95 1.65E+3 5.22E+2 - 7.67E+2 - 1.20E+6 3.59E+2 Nb-95 1.41E+5 7.80E+4 - 7.57E+4 3.34E+8 4.30E+4 Ru-103 1.81E+3 - 6.40E+3 - 1.52E+5 7.75E+2 V-) Ru-106 3.75E+4 - 7.23E+4 1.80E+6 4.73E+3 Ag-110m 9.63E+7 9.11E+7 - 1.74E+8 - 2.56E+10 5.54E+7 Sb-124:. 4.59E+7 8.46E+5 1.04E+5 - 4.01E+7 9.25E+8 1.79E+7 Sb-125:' 3.65E+7 3.99E+5 3.49E+4 - 3.21E+7 2.84E+8 8.54E+6 Te-125m 3.OOE+7 1.08E+7 8.39E+6 - - 8.86E+7 4.02E+6 z" 8.44E+7 2.99E+7 2101E+7 3.42E+8 - 2.10E+8 1.OOE+7 7 Te-127m V-) Te-129m 1.11E+8 4.10E+7 3.57E+7 4.62E+8 4.15E+8 1.75E+7 1-131 5.38E+8 7.53E+8 2120E+11 1.30E+9 1.49E+/-8 4.04E+8 1-132 2.90E-1 7.59E-1 2.56E+1 1.20E+O 3.31E-1 2.72E-1 1-133: 7.24E+6 1.23E+7 1.72E+9 2.15E+7 - 9.30E+6 3.75E+6 1134 - ....
1-135. 2.47E+4 6.35E+4 4.08E+6 1.OOE+5 - 7.03E+4 2.35E+4 0 Cs-134 9.81E+9 2.31E+10 7.34E+9 2.80E+9 2.87E+8 1.07E+10 Cs-136 4.45E+8 1.75E+9 9.53E+8 1.50E+8 1.41E+8 1.18E+9 Cs-137 1.34E+10 1.78E+10 - 6.06E+9 2.35E+9 2.53E+8 6.20E+9 Ba-140 4.85E+7 5.95E+4 - 2.02E+4 4.OOE+4 7.49E+7 3.13E+6 Ce-141 8.87E+3 1.35E+4 2.79E+3 -1.69E+7 6.81E+2 Ce-144 6.58E+5 2.72E+5 1.63E+5 - 1.66E+8 3.54E+4
>~ Pr-143 2.92E+2 1.17E+2 - 6.77E+1 - 9.61E+5 1.45E+1 Nd-147 1.81E+2 1.97E+2 - 1.16E+2 -7.11E+5 1.18E+l L.J Page 109 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
I S Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr~per gCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
mrem/yr per jiCi/sec) for others I
H-3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 1.57E+3 C-14 P-32 1.65E+6 7.77E+10 3.29E+5 3.64E+9 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 3.29E+5 2.15E+9 3.29E+5 3.OOE+9 I
Cr-51 . - 5.66E+4 1.55E+4 1.03E+5 5.41E+6 1.02E+5 Mn-54 Fe-55 1.12E+8 2.09E+7 5.93E+7 5.87E+6 3.35E+7 1.76E+7 1.1OE+7 5.58E+6 1.84E+7 I
Fe-59 1.20E+8 1.95E+8 - 5.65E+7 2.03E+8 9.71E+7 Co-57 Co-58
- 3.84E+6 1-.21E+7 3.14E+7 7.08E+7 7.77E+6 3.72E+7 I
Co-60
Ni-63 2.96E+10 4.32E+7 1.59E+9 2.39E+8
,07E+8 1.27E+8 1.01E+9 I
Zn-65 I
4.13E+9 1.1OE+lI - 6.94E+9 - 1.93E+9 6.85E+9 Rb-86 - 8.77E+9 - - 5.64E+8 5.39E+9 Sr-89 6.62E+9 - 2.56E+8 1.89E+8 Sr-90 1.12E+11 - 1.51E+9 2.83E+10 Y-91 Zr-95 3.91E+4 3.84E+3 8.45E+2 -
1.21E+3 -
5.21E+6 8.81E+5 1.04E+3 7.52E+2 Il 0
z.:
S Nb-95 Ru-103 Ru-106
.3.18E+5 4.29E+3 9.24E+4 1.24E+5 1.16E+5 1.08E+4 1.25E+5 2.29E+8 1.11E+5 1.44E+6 8.84E+4 1.65E+3 I C-) - - 1.15E+4 Ag-ll0m 2.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.63E+8 - 1.68E+10 1.13E+8 Sb-124 1.09E+8 1.41E+8 2.40E+5 6.03E+7 6.79E+8 3.81E+7 Sb-125 8.70E+7 1.41E+6 8.06E+4 - '4.85E+7 2.08E+8 1.82E+7 0
Te-125m 7.38E+7 2..OE+7 2.07E+7 . 7.12E+7 9.84E+6 Te-127m 2.08E+8 5.60E+7 4.97E+7 5.93E+8 - 1.68E+8 2.47E+7 Te-129m 2.72E+8 7.61E+7 8.78E+7 8.OOE+8 .. 3.32E+8 4.23E+7 z 1-131 1.30Et9 1.31E+9 4.34E+11 2.15E+9 - 1.17E+8 7.46E+8 1-132 6.86E-1 1.26E+O 5.85E+1 1.93E+0 1.48E+O 5.80E-1 1-133 1.76E8+7 2.18E+7 4.04E+9 3.63E+7 " - 8.77E+6 8.23E+6 1-134 ..... - ... ...
H- 1-135 5.84E+4 1.05E+5 9.30E+6 1.61E+5 8.OOE+4 4.97E+4 U-0 Cs-134.
Cs-136 2.26E+10 1.OOE+9 3.71E+i0 2.76E+9 1.15E+10 i4.13&+9 1.47E+9 '2.19E+8 2.OOE+8 9.70E+7 7.83E+9 1.79E+9 I
Cs-137 3.22E+10 3.09E+10 - 1.01E+10 3.62E+9 1.93E+8 4.55E+9 0v
(_9 Ba-140 1.17E+8 1.03E+5 - 3.34E+4 6.12E+4 5.94E+7 6.84E+6 0iLi Ce-141 w-2.19E+4 1.09E+4 - 4.78E+3 l.36E+7 1 1.62E+3 Ce-144 1.62E+6 5.09E+5 - 2.82E+5 - 1.33E+8 8.66E+4 w,
cr 0O
-LJ Pr-143 Nd-147 7.23E+2 4.45E+2 2.17E+2 3.60E+2 1.17E+2 1.98E+2 7.80E+5 5.71E+5 3.59E+1 2.79E+1 Il 2W SPage 119 of 153 Il
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases I. R(io), Grass-Cow-Milk Pathway Dose Factors - INFANT (mrem/yr per jCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
mrem/yr per jACi/sec) for others H-3 2.38gE+3 2.3 8E+3 2.38E+3 I 2.38E+3 2.38E+3 2.3 SE+3 C-14: 3.23E+6 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+5 6.89E+/-5 6.89E+5 P 1.60E+11 9.42E+9 - - 2.17E+9 6.21E+9 Cr-51 - 1.05E+5 2.30E+4 2.05E+5 4.71E+6 1.61E+5 Mn-54' - 3.89E+7 - 8.63E+6 - 1.43E+7 8.83E+6 Fe-55 1.35E+8, 8.72E+7 - 4.27E+7 1.11E+7 2.33E+7 Fe-59 2.25E+8 3.93E+8: - 1.16E+8 i.88E+8 1.55E+8 Co-57 - 8.95E+6 - - 3.05E+7 1.46E+7 Co - 2.43E+7 - - 6.05E+7 6.06E+7 Co-60 - 8.81E+7 - - 2.1OE+8 2.08E+8 Ni-63 3.49E+10 2.16E+9 - 1.07E+8 1.21E+9 Zn-65 5.55E+9 1.90E+10 9.23E+9 - 1.61E+10: 8.78E+9 Rb-86 - 2.22E+1 - - 5.69E+8 1.10E+10 Sr-890 1.26E+10 -- 2.59E+8 3.61E+8 Sr-90 1.22E+ 11 - - 1.52E+9 3.10E+10 Y-91 7.33E+4 - 5.26E-+6 1.95E+3 I. Zr-95 Nb-95 6.83E+3 5.93E+5) 1.66E+3 2.44E+5 1.79E+3 1.75E+5 8.28E+5 2.06E+8 1.18E+3 1.41E+5:
Ru-103 8.69E+3 - 1.81E+4 ,_ 1.06E+5 2.91E+3 r
Ru-106 1.90E+5 - 2.25E+5 - 1.44E+-6 2.38E+4 Ag-l0rn 3.86E+8 2.82E+8 4.03E+8 - 1.46E+10 1.86E+8:
Sb-124 2.09E+8 3.08E+6 5.56E+5 - 1.31E+8 6.46E+8 6.49E+7 C-)
Sb-125 l'49E+8 1.45E+6 1.87E+5 9.38E+7 1.99E+8 3.07E+7 Te-125m 1.51E+8 5.04E+7 5.07E+7 - - 7.18E+7 2.04E+7 Te-127m 4.21E+8 1.40E+8 1.22E+8 1.04E+9 - 1.70E+8 5.1OE+7, Te-129m 5.59E+8 1.92E+8 2.15E+8 1.40E+9 - 3.34E+8 8.62E+7 1-131 2.72E+9 3.21E+9 1.05E+12 3.75E+9 - 1.15E+8 1.41E+9.
1-132 :1.42E+0 2.89E+/-O 1.35E+2 3.22E+O 2.34E+0 1.03E+0O M1-33 3.72E+7 5.41E+7 9.84E+9 6836E+7 - 9.16E+6 1.58E+7 uLJ 1-134 1.01E-9 1-135 1.21E+5 2.41E+5 2.16E+7 2.69E+5 - 8.74E+4 8.80E+4 Cs-134 3.65E+10 6.80E+10 1.75E+10 7.18E+9 1.85E+8 6.87E+9 LLJ Cs-136 1.96E+9 5.77E+9 2.30E+9 4.70E+8 8.76E+7 2.15E+9, Cs-137. 5.15E+10 6.02E+10 - 1.62E+10 6.55E+9 1.88E+8 4.27E+9 Ba-140 2.41E+8 2.41E+5 - 5.73E+4 1.48E+5 5.92E+7 1.24E+7' 0 Ce-141 4.33E+4 2.64E+4 - 8.1SE+3 -1'.37E+7 3.11E+3 Ce-144: 2.33E+6 9.52E+5 - 3.85E+5 4.1.33E+8 1.30E+5 Pr-143 1.49E+3 5.59E+2 2.08E+2 . 7.89E+5. 7.41E+1 Nd-147 8.82E+2 9.06E+2 . 3.49E+2 - 5.74E+5 5.55E+1 Page 111 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 "Table 2-4 (cont'd) I a Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - ADULT (mrem/yrýper p.Ci/m3) for H-3 and C-14 I (m2
mrem/yr per jtCi/sec) for others I
H-3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E+3 2.26E&3 C-14 P-32 8.97E+5 1.40E+9 1.79E+5 8.73E+7 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.79E+5 1.58E+8 1.79E+5 5.42E+7 I Cr-51 - 2.79E+4 1.03E+4 6.19E+4 1.17E+7 4.66E+4 Mn-54 Fe-55 2.09E+8 3.11E+8 1.45E+8
- 9.27E+7 -
8.06E+7 9.54E+8 8.29E+7 5.94E+7 3.37E+7 I Fe-59 1.27E+8 2.99E+8 8.35E+7 9.96E+8 1.14E+8 Co-57 Co-58 1.17E+7 3.09E+7
- 2.97E+8 6.26E+8 1.95E+7 6.92E+7 I Co-60 - 1.67E+8 - - 3.14E+9 3.69E-8 Ni-63 Zn-65 1.04E+10 3.17E+8 7.21E+8 1.01E+9 6375E+8 1.50E+8, 6.36E+8 3.49E+8 4.56E+8 I Rb-86 - 2.19E+8 - 4.32E+7 1.02E+8 Sr-89 9.96E+9 -- 1.60E+9 2.86E+8 St-90 6.05E+1 1 -- 1.75E+10 1.48E+/-10O Y-91 5.13E+6 .. ... 2.82E+9 1.37E+5 Zr-95 Nb-95 1.19E+6 1.42E+5 3.81E+5:
7.91E+4
- 5.97E+5 7.81E+4 1.21E+9 4.80E+8 2.58E+5 4.25E+4 I Ru-103 4.80E+6 1.83E+7 - 5.61E+8 2.07E+6 Ru-106 Ag-I 10m 1.93E+8 1.06E+7 9.76E+6
- 3.72E+8 1.92E+7 1.25E+/-10 3.98E+9 2.44E+7 i 5.80E+6 I Sb-124 1.04E+8 1.96E+6 2.52E+5 - 8.08E+7 2.95E+9 4.1 1E+7 0 Sb-125 Te-125m l.36E+8 9.66E+7 1.52E+6 3.50E+7 1.39E+5 2.90E+7 3.93E+8 i.05E+8 1-1.50E+9 3.86E+8 3.25E+7 f 1.29E+7 I I Te-127m 3.49E+8 1.25E+8 8.92E+7 1.42E+9 1.17E+9 4.26E+7 C-7 Te-129mr 1-131 2.55E+8 8.09E+7 9.50E+7 1.16E+8 8.75E+7 3.79E+10 1.06E+9 1.98E+8 1.28E+9 3.05E+7 4.03E+7 6.63E+7 I 1-132 5.74E+1 1.54E+2 5.38E+3 2.45E+2 - 2.89E+1 5.38E+1 0.D 0
<w L/I 1-133 1-134'
.2.12E+6-1.06E-4 3.69E+6 2.88E-4 5.42E+8 5.OOE-3 6.44E+6 4.59E-4
. .3.31E+6 2.51E-7 1.12E+6, 1.03E-4 i; I
-135 - 4.08E+4 1.07E+5 7.04E+6 1.71E+5 - 1.2IE+/-5 3.94E+4 w7 0
0.
n" Cs-134.
Cs-136!
4.66E+9 4.20E+7 1.11E+10 1.66E+8 3.59E+9 9.24E+7 1.19E+9 1.27E+7 1.94E+8 1.89E+7 9.07E+9 1.19E+8 *. i 0
Cs-137
Ba-140 6.36E+9 1.29E+8 8.70E+9 1.62E+5 2.95E+9 5.49E+4 9.81E+8 9.25E+4 I.68E+8 2.65E+8 5.70E+9 8.43E+6 I z Ce-141 1.96E+5 1.33E+5 6.17E+4 5.08E+8 1.51E+4 rK Ce-144 Pr-143 3.29E+7 6.34E+4 1.38E+7 2.54E+4 8.16E+6 1.,47E+4
- 1.11E÷10 2.78E+8 1.77E+6 3.14E+3 {*
I Nd-147 3.34E+4 3.86E+4 - 2.25E+4 I 1.85E+8 2.31E+3
-LJ 0
I Page 112 of 153
!:; i
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
I* Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - TEENAGER (mrem/yr per piCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 (m2
mrern/yr per tCi/sec) for others H-3 - 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 2.59E+3 C-14 1.45E+6 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 2.91E+5 P-32 1.61E+9 9.96E+7 .... 1.35E+8 6.23E+7 Cr-51 , 3.44E+4 1.36E+4 8.85E+4 1.04E+7 6.20E+4 Mn-54 - 4.52E+8 1.35E+8 - 9.27E+8 8.97E+7 Fe-55 3.25E+8 2.31E+8 -1.46E+8 9.98E+7 5.38E+7 Fe-59 1.91E+8 4.22E+8 1.33E+8 9.98E+8 1.63E+8 Co-57 - 1.79E+7 - 3.34E+8 3.OOE+7 Co-58 4.38E+7 - 6.04E+8 1.O1E+8 Co-60 - 2.49E+8 - 3.24E+9 5.60E+8 Ni-63 1.61E+10 1.13E+9 - - 1.81E+8 5.45E+8 Zn-65., 4.24E+8 1.47E+9 9.41E+8 - 6.23E+8 6.86E+8 Rb-86 - 2.73E+8 - 4.05E+7 1.28E+8 Sr-89 1.51E+10 - 1.80E+9 4.33E+8 Sr-90 7.51E+11 - - 2.11E+10 1.85E+11 Y-91 7.87E+6 - - - 3.23E+9 2.11E+5 Zr-95 1.74E+6' 5.49E+5 8.07E+5 - 1.27E+9 3.78E+5 Nb-95 1.92E+5 1.06E+5 1.03E+5 - 4.55E+8 5.86E+4 Ru-103 6.87E+6 2.42E+7 - 5.74E+8 2.94E+6 Ru-106. 3.09E+8 - 5.97E+8 - 1.48E+10 3.90E+7 Ag-110m 1.52E+7 1.44E+7 2.74E+7 - 4.04E+9 8.74E+6 Sb-124: 1.55E+8 2.85E+6 3.51E+5 - 1.35E+8 3.11E+9 6.03E+7 0 Sb-125 2.14E+8 2.34E+6 2.04E+5 - 1.88E+8 1.66E+9 5.OOE+7 Te-125m 1.48E+8 5.34E+7 4.14E+7 - - 4.37E+8 1.98E+7 Te-127m 5.51E+8 1.96E+8 1.31E+8 2.24E+9 - 1.37E+9 6.56E+7
(-)
Te-129m 3.67E+8 1.36E+8 1.18E+8 1.54E+9 - 1.38E+9 5.81E+7 1-131 7.70E+7 1.08E+8 3.14E+10 1.85E+8 - 2.13E+7 5.79E+7 1-132, 5.18E+1 1.36E+2 4.57E+3 2.14E+2 - 5.91E+1 4.87E+1 0
1-133 1.97E+6 3.34E+6 4.66E+8 5.86E+6 - 2.53E+6 1.02E+6 1-134 9.59E-5 2.54E-4 4.24E-3 4.01E-4 - 3.35E-6 9.13E-5 w 1-135 3.68E+4 9.48E+4 6.1OE+6 1.50E+5 - 1.05E+5 3.52E+4 Cs-134 7.09E+9 1.67E+10 - 5.30E+9 2.02E+9 2.08E+8 7.74E+9 Cs-136 4.29E+7 1.69E+8 - 9.19E+7 1.45E+7 1.36E+7 1.13E+8 Cs-137 1.01E+10 1.35E+1O - 4.59E+9 1.78E+9 1.92E+8 4.69E+9 0y Ba-140 1.38E+8 1.69E+5 - 5.75E+4 1.14E+5 2.13E+8 8.91E+6 Ce-141 2.82E+5 1.88E+5 - 8.86E+4 - 5.38E+8, 2.16E+4 Ce-144 5.27E+7 2.18E+7 -1.30E+7 - 1.33E-÷10 2.83E+6 Pr-143 7.12E+4 2.84E+4 - 1.65E+4 2.34E+8 3.55E+3 Nd-147 3.63E+4 3.94E+4 - 2.32E+4 - 1.42E+8 2.36E+3 j Page 113 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
I Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases R(io), Vegetation Pathway Dose Factors - CHILD (mrem/yr per tCi/m3) for H-3 and C-14 I
(m2
mnrem/yr per gtCi/sec) for others I
H-3 4.01E+3 4.O1E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 4.01E+3 C-14 P-32 3.50E+6 3.37E+9 7.01E+5 1.58E+8 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 7.01E+5 9.30E+7 7.01E+5 1.30E+8 I
Cr-51 - - 6.54E+4 1.79E+4 1.19E+5 6.25E+6 1.18E+5 Mn-54 Fe-55 8.OOE+8 6.61E+8 4.24E+8 1.85E+8 -
2.40E+8 5.55E+8 7.86E+7 1.76E+8 1.31E+8 I
Fe-59 4.01E+8 6.49E+8 - 1.88E+8 6.76E+8 3.23E+8 Co-57 Co-58 2.99E+7 6.47E+7 2.45E+8 3.77E+8 6.04E+7 1.98E+8 I
Co-60 - 3.78E+8 - 2.10E+9 1.12E+9 Ni-631 Zn-65 3.95E+10 8.12E+8 2.11E+9 2.16E+9
- 1.36E+9 1.42E+8 3.80E+8 1.34E+9 1.35E+9 I
Rb-86 - 4.52E+8 - 2.91E+7 2.78E+8 Sr-89 Sr-90 3.59E+10 1.24E+12
- 1.39E+9 1.67E+10 1.03E+9 3.15E+11 I
Y-91 1.87E+7 - 2.49E+9 5.01E+5 (I)
Li Ia. Zr-95 Nb-95 3.90E+6 4.1OE+5 8.58E+5 1.59E+5 1123E+6 1!50E+5 -
8.95E+8 2.95E+8 7.64E+5 1.14E+5 I
Ru-103 1.55E+7 - 3.89E+7 3.99E+8* 5.94E+6 Ru-106 Ag-r1 10m 7.45E+8_
3.22E+7 2.17E+7 1OIE+9 4!05E+7 1.16E+1-0:
2.58E+9 9.30E+7 1.74E+7 I
(.9 Sb-124 3.52E+8 4.57E+6 7.78E+5 - 1.96E+8 2.20E ,9 1.23E+8 z0 Sb-125 4.99E+8 3.85E+6 4.62E+5 i. 2.78E+8 1.19E+9 1.05E+8 Te-125rn 3.51E+8 9.50E+7 9.84E+7 *- - 3.38E+8 4.67E+7 LU Te-127m 1.32E+9 3.56E+8 3.16E+8 3.77E+9 - 1.07E+9 1.57E+8 Te-129m 1-131 .
8.54E+8 1.43E+8 2.39E+8 1.44E+8 2.75E+8 4.76E+10 2!51E+9 2N36E+8 1.04E+9 1.28E+7 1.33E+8 8.18E+7 01 1-132 9.20E+1 1.69E+2 7.84E+3 2.59E+2 - 1.99E+2 7.77E+1 0
1-133 "
-Ii34:,
3.59E+6 1:70E-4 4.44E+6 3.16E-4
'8.25E+8 7.28E-3 7A4E+6 4:84E-4 1.79E+6 2.10E-4 1.68E+6 1.46E-4 I
1-135 6.54E+4 1.18E+5 1.04E+7 1.81E+5 8.98E+4 5.57E+4 z
LU (A Cs-134 1.60E+1 0 2.63E+10 - 8.:14E+9 2.92E+9 1.42E+8 5.54E+9 w
Cs-136 8.06E+7 2.22E+8 - 118E+8 1.76E+7 7.79E+6 1.43E+8 Cs-137 2.39E+10 2.29E+10 - 7.46E+9 2.68E+9 1.43E+8 3.38E+9 Ba-140 2.77E+8 2.43E+5 - 7:90E+4 1.45E+5 1.40E+8 1.62E+7 Ce-141 6.35E+5 3.26E+5 1.43E+5 4.07E+8 4.84E+4 Ce-144 1.27E+8 3.98E+7 - 2.21E+7 - 1.04E+10 6.78E+6 LU 0 Pr-143 1.48E+5 4.46E+4 - 2.41E+4 - 1.60E+8 7.37E+3 L-Nd-147: 7.16E+4 5.80E+4 - 3.i18E+4 9.18E+7 4.49E+3 0~
(..
-J LU L-,-
Page 114 of 153 I
11
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 Table 2-4 (cont'd)
Pathway Dose Factors - Atmospheric Releases I.ý R(io), Ground Plane Pathway Dose Factors (m2* mrem/yr per gCi/sec)
Nuclide Any Organ H-3 C-14 P-32 Cr-51 4.68E+6 Mn-54 1.34E+9 Fe-55 Fe-59 2.75E+8 Co-58 3.82E+8 Co-60 2.16E+10 Ni-63 Zn-65 7.45E+8 Rb-86 8.98E+6 Sr-89 2.16E+4 Sr-90 Y-91 1.08E+6 Zr-95 2.48E+8 l, Nb-95 Ru-103 1.36E+8 1.09E+8 Ru-106 4.21E+8 Ag-110rn 3.47E+9 Te-125m 1.55E+6 Te-127m 9.17E+4 Te-129m 2.OOE+7 C) 1-131 1.72E+7 1-132 1.24E+6 0
U-- 1-133 2.47E+6 1-134 4.49E+5 1-135 2.56E+6
'2uLJ Cs-134 6.75E+9 14 Cs-136 Cs-137 Ba-140 1.49E+8 1.04E+10 2.05E+7 Ce-141 1.36E+7 Ce-144 6.95E+7 0 Pr- 143 U-° rv-Nd-147 8.40E+6 SLJt C/)
Page 115 of 153
I I
S Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
I I
I APPENDIX A I EVALUATION OF DEFAULT MPC VALUES FOR LIQUID EFFLUENTS I
0
(-53 t
0 0
0*
uii z
-r" z"
I) 0 Vf) q w
-J z, [r D.*
Page 116 of 153
¢:
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 APPENDIX A: Evaluation of Default MPC Value for Liquid Effluent Monitors In accordance with the requirements of CONTROL 3.3.7.10 the radioactive effluent monitors shall be operable with alarm setpoints established to ensure that the concentration of radioactive material at the discharge point does not exceed the MPC value of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 (Appendix F). The determination of allowable radionuclide concentration and corresponding alarm setpoint is a function of the individual monitor.
I In order to limit the need for routinely having to re-establish the alarm setpoints as a function of changing' radionuclide distributions, a default alarm setpoint can be established. This default setpoint can be based on an evaluation of the radionuclide distribution from the 1997 to 1999 release data of the liquid effluents from Hope Creek and the effective MPC value for this distribution.
The effective MPC value for a radionuclide distribution is calculated by the equation:
Ci(gamma)
MPC..= ' (A.1)
(gamma) 7MPCe zwhere:
o MPC, = an effective MPC value for a mixture of radionuclides (0Ci/mi)
Hz V Ci MPCI
=concentration of radionuclide i in the mixture
= the 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column II MPC value for radionuclide i (p.Ci/ml) Appendix F V) Considering the average effective MPC values from 1997 thru 1999 releases it is reasonable to select an MPC value of 4.09E-5 A.Ci/ml as typical of liquid radwaste discharges. This value will be o reviewed and adjusted as necessary based on the distribution history of effluents from Hope Creek.
> Using the value of 4.09E-5 ACi/ml to calculate the default alarm setpointresults in a setpoint that:
(1) Will not require frequent re-adjustment due to minor variations in the nuclide distribution which are typical of routine plant operations, and;
>* (2) Will provide for a liquid radwaste discharge rate (as evaluated for each batch release) that is compatible with plant operations (Refer to Table 1-1).
0*
0
) 11 'o 153., .-
Pagelof3
' w-ly
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 I
S 1.0 Default Setpoint Determination: I Conservative alarm setpoints can be determined through the use of default parameters. Table 1-1 summarizes all current default values in use for Hope Creek. I A. Liquid Radwaste Monitor (RE4861)
I SP<R MPC* CTBD
1 RRT*' (1.2)
I Default values from Table 1-1:
I MPC, CTBD =
4.09E-5 p.Ci/mln 12000 gpm I
RR 176 gpm (LRW)
Bkg = 0 pCi/ml CF 0.8 4.09E-5
12000
0.2 SP< -- _-----------------.... +0 176 SP 5.58E-4 aCi/mI 1
(/)
z 00 Correction Factor:
LuI z.
A correction factor must be applied to the default setpoint calculation in order to account for radiation monitor uncertainties- and the "contribution of non-gamma emitting radionuclides such as H-3, Sr, and Fe.
I 0
7---
¢-
a. Radiation Monitor Inaccuracies:
.0 Hope Creek PSBP 311649 lists a total loop accuracy of 30% for the liquid radwaste radiation LuJ monitors. A factor of 0.30 is applied to the default setoint to ensure the trip set0pint is reached 0 before the analytical limit is obtained.
ks-ED r-0 Lu 0
LuJ Page 118 of 153 Lu,
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23
b. Non-Gamma Emitting Radionuclides:
Non-gamma emitting radionuclides are analyzed on a monthly and quarterly basis from composite samples of liquid radwaste releases..
Nuclide: MPC (PCi/ml) Activity (.tCi/ml) Activity / MPC H-3 3E-3 L.0E-1 33.3 Fe-55 8E-4 4.7E-4 0.59 Sr-89 3E-6 1.6E-6 0.53 Sr-90 3E-7 2.OE-8 0.07 Total 1_34.5 The values in the table above represent the historical maximum reactor coolant values for non-gamma emitting nuclides (H3 is an assumed maximum). Reactor coolant values were chosen to represent the maximum concentration of non-gamma emitting radionuclides that could be released from Hope Creek station in liquid effluent. The activity values in the table are further diluted by a minimum factor of 68 prior to release to the Delaware River. The minimum dilution factor is obtained by using the minimum cooling tower blowdown flowrate of 12,000 gpm and the maximum release rate of 176 gpm.
A conservative correction factor for non-gamma emitting radionuclides can be obtained by using the highest Activity / MPC fraction and the minimum dilution factor as follows:
Correction Factor (non-gamma) = 34.5 / 68 = 0.5 An overall correction factor can be obtained by adding the correction factor for radiation monitor Z inaccuracies and non-gamma emitting radionuclides as follows:
Overall Correction factor = 0.3 + 0.5 = 0.8 B. Cooling Tower Blowdown Radiation Monitor (RE8817) 0 The cooling tower blowdown radiation monitor provides an Alarm only function for releases into
>/3the environment. The cooling tower blowdown is the final release point for liquid effluents from Hope Creek station to the Delaware River.
SP < MPC* 0.2
> SP < 4.09E-5 Ci/rmI
0.2 SP < 8.18E-61uCi/ml (RE8817) n .- Page 119 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 C. Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radiation Monitor (RE4557)
The Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radiation Monitor:(1RE4557) provides automatic termination of liquid radioactive releases from the Circulating Water Dewatering Sump.
The sump pumps discharge to the circulating water system to the:cooling tower. Plant design and.
procedures maintain the setpoint at <2 times background radiation levels. Releases from the sump
at gamma activity concentrations less than the monitor setpoint are considered continuous releases since inputs to the sump would occur during discharge. Releases of activity above the established continuous release setpoint may be performed on a batch basis following sampling and analysis of the sump contents. Hope Creek calculation SP-0004 established a setpoint for the monitor at 1.4E-.
02 JtCi/ml based on a postulated release of reactor steam into the sump. Using the MPCe determined for Liquid Radwaste and Cooling Tower Blowdown monitors, a more conservative maximum default value for batch releases can be determined:,
SP* MPCT*
' I *IBL)
(1.2)
RR P Default values from Table 1-1:
MPCC = 4.09E-5 LtCi/ml
_ CTBD 12000 gpm
<RR = 100gpmr 0 Bkg = 0 .Ci/ml CF 0.8 0 4.09E-5
12000
0.2
<SP < ------------- 7------------ +0
0) 100 SP < 9."82E'4 Ci/ml. (batch releases only) -
k For continuous releases, the maximum setpoint should be less than 2.4E-6/zCi/ml above background to limit dose consequences from this pathway. (4HE-0241, CVF-98-0002) t-.
LU12.*
Page 120 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 If D. Releases from the Condensate Storage Tank If the Condensate Storage Tank (CST) requires release to the Delaware River, the discharge path would be through installed piping connected to the liquid Radwaste discharge path such that both the Liquid Radwaste Discharge Monitor and the Cooling Tower Blowdown monitor could detect and isolate/alarm on unexpected activity. Default setpoints are determined for potential releases of the CST.
a. Liquid Radwaste Monitor (RE4861)
SP* MPCe* CTBD* 1 (1.2)
RR Default values from Table 1-1:
MPCe 4.09E-5 gtCi/ml CTBD = 12000 gpm RR 1300 gpm Bkg = 0 jtCi/ml CF 0.8
<SP <
4.09E-5
12000
0.2
--........ + 0 1300 S< SP < 7.55E-5 uCi/ml (RE4861)
< b.Cooling Tower Blowdown Radiation Monitor (RE8817)
H o
zThe cooling tower blowdown radiation monitor provides an Alarm only function for releases into the environment. The cooling tower blowdown is the final release point for liquid effluents from
> Hope Creek station to the Delaware River.
SP <!MPCe *0.2 Z-SP < 4.09E-5 jACiml
0.2 SP < 8.18E-6aCilmt (RE8817) 0U-Page 121 of 153 Q:U
I I
0 Hope Creek ODCM Rev. 23 TABLE A-I: CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE MPC - HOPE CREEK I 1997 1998 1999 I ACTIVITY ACTIVITY ACTIVITY RELEASED RELEASED RELEASED NUCLIDE MPC (Ci) (Ci) (Ci) I Cr-51 2.OOE-03 7,44E-03 2.37E-02 1.66E-02 Mn-54 1.OOE-04 1,74E-02 7.48E-03 -6.871E-02 Mn-56 1.OOE-04 , N/D N/D 9.36E-06 Co-58 9.OOE-05 5,68E-04 7.67E-04 3.30E-03 Co-60 3.OOE-05 7.05E-03 6.78E-03 2.05E-02 Na-24 3.OOE-05 N/D 7.02E-02 1.01E-03 Cs-137 2.OOE-05 2.84E-06 1.03E.06 2.23E-04 Zn-65 1.00E-04 1.29E-03 1.39E-03 3.37E-03 Zn-69m 6.OOE-05 1.58E-05 N/D 2.64E-04 Fe-59 5.OOE-05 2.65E-03 1.62E-04 1.72E-02 As-76 2.OOE-05 7.70E-05 N/D 9.94E-05 Nb-95 1.OOE-04 N/D N/D 1.69E-04 Mo-99 4.OOE-05 9.56E-05 N/D N/D Zr-95 6.OOE-05 N/D N/D 4.08E-05 I Tc-99m
ýRu-105 3.OOE-03 1.OOE-04 1.29E-04 N/D 2.05E-04 N/D 3.35E-04 4.45E-05 Ag-Il0m 3.OOE-05 4.85E-05 1.36E-05 3.88E-04 Sb-124 2.OOE-05 N/D N/D 4.63E-05 Cs-134 9.OOE-06 N/D N/D 7.13E-05 z
1-133 1.OOE-06 N/D 3.11E-05 N/D H--
La-140 2.OOE-05 N/D N/D 4.82E-06 0
H-3 3.O0E-03 1.24E+01 2.76E+01 2.95E+01 0
Fe-55 8.OOE-04 2.28E-01 6.40E-03 2.83E-02 Sr-89 3.OOE-06 8.56E-03 1.34E-05 3.29E-05 Total Curies (Gamma) 3.68E-02 1.11E-01 1.32E-01 0
SUM (CiJMPCi)
(Gamma) 4.93E+02 2.71E+03 1.87E+03 w
nr-J ZL SUM (CiiMPCi)
(Non-Gamma) 7.27E+03 9.21E+03 9.88E+03 w~
02 MPCe ($4Ci/ml) 7.45E-05 4.09E-05 7.03E-05 N/D=Not detected
.0 S.
Page 122 of 153 W 0 ,
I Io Hope Creek ODCM Rev,23 I.
I APPENDIX B TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS LIQUID RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I
I, l-)
u1 114 0U-)
U-
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 APPENDIX B: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors - Liquid Effluent The radioactive liquid effluents from Hope Creek from 1997 through 1999 were evaluated to determine the dose contribution of the radionuclide distribution. This analysis was performed to I
evaluate the use of a limited dose analysis for determining environmental doses, providing a simplified method ýof determining compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2. For the expected radionuclide distribution of effluent from Hope Creek during 1997 to 1999, the controlling I
organ is the GI-LLI (Bone dose was controlling in 1997 due to relatively high percentage of Fe-55).
The calculated GI-LLI dose is predominately a function of the Zn-65, Fe-55, and Fe-59 releases.
These radionuclides also contribute the large majority of the calculated total body dose. The results I
of this evaluation are presented in Table.B-1.
For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant radionuclide and limit the calculation processlto the use of the dose conversion factor for this nuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e.,
cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative.
For the evaluation of the maximum organ dose, it 'is conservative to use the Fe-59 dose
' conversion factor (6.32E5 mrem/hr per I.LCi/ml). By this approach, the maximum organ dose will be overestimated since this nuclide has the highest organ dose fraction of all the V) radionuclides evaluated. For the total body calculation; the Zn-65 dose factor (2.32E5 mrem/hr 0 per ýtCi/ml, total body) is the highest among the identified dominant nuclides.
oFor evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.1.2, the following simplified equations may be used:
V) Total Bo dy Dhb= 8.35E-04*VOL*A Db = 0o*G GB (B.1) zCTBD
_ where:
Dtb = dose to the total body (mrem)
Ai,th S = 2.32E5, total body ingestion dose conversion factor for Zn-65 where A is dose conversion factor, i is isotope which is Zn-65, and TB is the total body (mrem/hr Vper itCi/ml)
>. VOL = volume of liquid effluent released (gal) 0 Ci = total concentration of all radionuclides (ptCi/ml)
. CTBD = average cooling tower blowdown discharge rate during release period (gal/min) 8.35E-04 = conversion factor (1.67E-2 hr/min) and the near field dilution factor 0.05
Substituting the value for the Zn-65 total body dose conversion factor, the equation simplified 7 to:
0 Page 124 of 153-
¢r" tD
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 Dtb= 1.94E+02*VOL*Ci CTB (
(.2)
CTBD Maximum Organ 8.35E-4 *VOL*Ai.- U*- "c
. =CTBD (B.3)
Where:
Dmax = maximum organ dose (mrem)
A1 , 01-LUL 6.32E5, GI-LLI ingestion dose conversion factor for Fe-59 where A is dose conversion factor, i is isotope which is Fe-59 and o is maximum organ which is the GI-LLI (nremmhr per pCi/ml).
Substituting the value for Ai, G[-LLI the equation simplifies to:
I ) 5.28E+2*VOL*OCL i J .D max = 0BA) 7a CTBD ...
- Tritium is not included in the limited analysis dose assessment for liquid releases, because the potential dose resulting from normal reactor releases is relatively negligible.
VNear Field Dilution Factor
.- The near field dilution factor stems from NUREG-0133, Section-4.3. For plants with cooling towers, such as :Hope Creek, a dilution factor is allowed so that the product of the average 0 blowdown flow (in CFS) and the dilution factor is 1000 cfs or less. UFSAR Section 2.2.12
>states that the dilution by river flow ranges from 14- to 40-fold in the mixing zone of effluent Sdischarges and that existing cross currents tend to improve this overall dilution. The average CD minimum cooling tower blowdown for Hope Creek is 1.90E4 GPM (from FSAR 11.2). This converts to 42 CFS. Selecting a dilution factor of 20 (between 14 and 40 from the UFSAR)
"yields a product of 880 CFS, which is less than the 1000 cfs allowed by NUREG-0133. This
> near field dilution' factor of 20 is inverted to a multiple of 0.05, which is used in the liquid effluent dose calculations.
0 cii z
Page 125 of 153
(/3 1,1
I S Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 TABLE B-i: Adult Dose Contributions Fish and Invertebrate Pathways
' Hope Creek I
I Nuclide Release TB Dose Fraction GI-LLI Dose Fraction Bone Dose Fraction Liver Dose Fraction Year Ii (Ci)
Fe-55 2.28E-01 0.77 0.63 0.96 0.86 1997 Fe-55 Fe-55.
6.40E-03 2.83E-02 0.12 0.1 0.12 0.04 0.58 0.43 0.22 0.15 1998 1999 I Mn-54 1.74E-02 0.05 0 0.01 1997 Mn-54:
Mn-54 7.48E-03 6.87E-02 0.02 0.04 0.14 0.1 0
0 0.05 0.07 1998 1999 I
Co-58 Co-58.
5.68E-04 7.67E-04 0
0 1997 1998 I
Co-58 3.30E-03 *
0
1999
('1 I Fe-59 2.65E-03 0.08 0.23 0.02: 0.05 1997 I Fe-59 1.62E-04 0.03 0.09 0.02 0.03 1998 Fe-59 1.72E-02 0.51 0.7 ' 0.4 0.5 1999
),) Co-60 7.05E-03 0.01 0.03 0
1997 Co-60 6.78E-03 0.06. 0.2 0 0.01 1998 I--
0 Co-.60 2.05E-02 0.03 0.04 0
1999 z Zn-65 1.29E-03 0.12 0.06 0.02 0.07 1997 (I3 Zn-65 Zn-65 1.39E-03 3.37E-03 0.75 0.32 K 0.4 i.
0.07 1 0.4 0.16 0.68 0.27 1998 19991.
I U-- * = Less than 0.01 I
0 T
.I.J o-z U-0 LI.u
>y
©y Page 126 of 153" W
V)
Cr)
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 0
IL APPENDIX C V. TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE FACTORS GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS IL I
IA LJ
ic Page 127 of 153
I I
S Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 APPENDIX C: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Factors - Gaseous Effluents I Overview I The evaluation of doses due to releases of radioactive material to the atmosphere can be simplified by the use of effective dose transfer factors instead of using dose factors which are radionuclide specific. These effective factors, which are based on typical radionuclide distributions of releases, can be applied to the total radioactivity releases to approximate the dose in the environment. Instead of having to perform individual radionuclide dose analysis only a single multiplication (i.e., Keff, Meff, or Neff times the total quantity of radioactive material releases) would be needed. The approach provides a reasonable estimate of the actual dose while eliminating the need for a detailed calculation technique.
Determination of Effective Dose Factors Effective dose transfer factors are calculated by the following equations:
Ketff KIC (C.1)
I Where:
(/)
K~ff = the effective total body factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released.
(.0 = the total body dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.
fi = the fractional abundance of noble gas radionuclide i relative to the total noble gas 0
activity.
z
... .:
i-
7) Iff 7EI ý1 MI (C.2) z I where:
L-(L + 1. 1Mff) = the effective skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from all noble Z gases released.
(Li + I.1 Mi) = the skin dose factor due to beta and gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released., f/
ry
.ML.
Me - Ii (C.3)
I Page 128 of 153 t w
If)
D
Hope Creek ODCM Rev23 where:
Meff = the effective air dose factor due to gamma emissions from all noble gases released.
Mi = the air dose factor due to gamma emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.
Nf Ac ,(C.4) where:
Neff = the effective air dose factor due to beta emissions from all noble gases released.
Ni = the air dose factor due to beta emissions from each noble gas radionuclide i released.
Normally, it would be expected that past radioactive effluent data would be used for the determination of the effective dose factors. However, the noble gas releases from Hope Creek have a short history and with continued excellent fuel performance, has hampered efforts in collecting and detecting appreciable noble gas mixes of radionuclides. So, to provide a reasonable basis for the derivation of the effective noble gas dose factors, the source terms from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1, "Source -Term Specifications", Table 5 has been used as
, representing a typical distribution. The effective dose factors as derived are presented in Table W Application To provide an additional degree of conservatism, a factor of 0.50 is introduced into the dose T calculation process when the effective dose transfer factor is used. This conservatism provides additional assurance that the evaluation of doses by the use of a single effective factor will not zsignificantly underestimate any actual doses in the environment.
For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.2, the following simplified
< equations may be used:
I)
MfD* Qi (C.5)
U- ~~~0.50 Nf* Q(C6 IY> Df D = 3.417E
-08 0.50 %Q
, Netf
i .(C.6)
Where:
Dr = air dose due to gamma emissions for the cumulative release of all noble 0 gases (mrad) ns Page 129 of 153 irK
I I
S Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 I
Do = air dose due to beta emissions for the cumulative release of all noble gases (mrad)
X/Q Metr atmospheric dispersion to the controlling site boundary (sec/m 3)
=8.1 E3, effective gamma-air dose factor (mrad/yr per PC/m 3) F Neff = 8.5E3, effective beta-air dose factor (mrad/yr per pCi/m3)
Qi = cumulative release for all noble gas radionuclides (PCi) 3.17E-08 = conversion factor (yr/sec) I 0.50 conservatism factor to account for the variability in the effluent data Combining the constants, the dose calculation equations simplify to: I D= 5.14E-4,Q*Z *Q (C.7)
I DPf =ý5.39E-4 *ZQZQi (C.8)
Q.
I The effective dose factors are to be used.on a limited basis for the purpose of facilitating the I timely assessment of radioactive effluent releases, particularly during periods of computer malfunction where a detailed dose assessment may be unavailable. I LU 0
z 4
x C-)
II I
0:
LUJ 0*
NLO LI Page 130 of 153 0-ZI)
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 1I. TABLE C-i: Effective Dose Factors Noble Gases Total Body and Skin Dose Total Body Effective Skin Effective Kfr (L+ 1.1 Meff)
Radionuclide -A (mrem/jr per I!Ci/m 3) (mrem/yr per IACi/m 3 )
Kr83m 0.01 Kr85m 0.01 1.01E 2.8E1 Kr87 0.04 2.4E2 6.6E2 Kr88 0.04 5.9E2 7.6E2 Kr89 0.27 4.5E3 7.9E3 Xe133 0.02 5.9E0 1.4E1 Xe135 0.05 9.0E1 2.0E2 Xe135m 0.06 1.9E2 2.6E2 Xe137 0.31 4.4E2 4.323 Xe138 0.19 1.7E3 2.7E3 Total 7.8E3 1.7E4 Noble Gases - Air Total Body Effective Skin Effective K.ff (L + 1.1 Meff) 3 LU w
Radionuclide 0.01 (mremlyr per LCi/m ) (mrem/yr per jACi/m 3) v-Kr83m 0.01 3.0E0 0* Kr85m 0.04 1.2E1 2.0E1 z Kr87 0.04 2.5E2 4.1E2 0
Kr88 6.1E2 1.2E2 Kr89 0.27 4.7E3 2.9E3 Xel33 0.02 7.OEO 2.1El Xe135 0.05 9.6E1 1.2E2 Xel35m 0.06 2.0E2 4.4E1 Xe137 0.31 4.7E2 3.9E3 Xe138 0.19 1.8E3 9.0E2 0
Total 8.1E3 8.4E3
(/3 L..
0
Based on noble gas distribution from ANSI N237-1976/ANS-18.1,"Source Term
-. Specification".
LU Page 131 of 153
I I
S Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 k
APPENDIX D I
I TECHNICAL BASIS FOR EFFECTIVE DOSE PARAMETERS I
GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I
I I
I I I
0 I z.
l-r-I
-c.
0 U---
I I
0 I
Ld "L.U Ld.-
Page 132 of 153
.LU 0*-
I
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 I* APPENDIX D: Technical Basis for Effective Dose Parameters - Gaseous Effluent The pathway dose factors for the controlling infant age group were evaluated to determine the controlling pathway, organ and radionuclide. This analysis was performed to provide a simplified method for determining compliance with CONTROL 3.11.2.3. For the infant age group, the controlling pathway is the grass - cow - milk (g/c/m) pathway. An infant receives a greater radiation dose from the g/c/m pathway than any other pathway. Of this g/c/m pathway, the maximum exposed organ including the total body, is the thyroid, and the highest dose contributor is radionuclide 1-131. The results of this evaluation are presented in Table D-1.
For purposes of simplifying the details of the dose calculation process, it is conservative to identify a controlling, dose significant organ and radionuclide and limit the calculation process to the use of the dose conversion factor for the organ and radionuclide. Multiplication of the total release (i.e., cumulative activity for all radionuclides) by this dose conversion factor provides for a dose calculation method that is simplified while also being conservative.
For the evaluation of the dose commitment via a controlling pathway and age group, it is conservative to use the infant, g/c/m, thyroid, 1-131 pathway dose factor (1.67E12 m 2*mrem/yr per itCi/sec). By this approach, the maximum dose commitment will be overestimated since I-131 has the highest pathway dose factor of all radionuclides evaluated.
For evaluating compliance with the dose limits of CONTROL 3.11.2.3, the following simplified equation may be used:
D ax=3.17E-8*W*RJ- 131*zQi (D.1)
Where:
Dm. = maximum organ dose (mrem)
W = atmospheric dispersion parameter to the controlling location (s) as identified in Table 2-3.
X/Q = Atmospheric dispersion for inhalation pathway (sec/m 3)
DIQ = atmospheric disposition for vegetation, milk and ground plane exposure pathways LJ (m"2)
LU Qi = cumulative release over the period of interest for radioiodines and particulates 3.17E-8 = conversion factor (yr/sec)
RljtM = 1-131 dose parameter for the thyroid for the identified controlling pathway.
= 1.05E12, infant thyroid dose parameter with the grass - cow - milk pathway controlling (m2mrem/yr per ptCi/sec)
The ground plane exposure and inhalation pathways need not be considered when the above simplified calculational method is used because of the overall negligible contribution of these Page 133 of 153 LU
I S Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 pathways to the total.,thyroid dose. It is recognized that for some particulate radionuclides (e.g.,
Co-60 and Cs-137), the ground exposure pathway may represent a higher dose contribution than I
either the vegetation or milk pathway. However, use of the 1-131 thyroid dose parameter for all radionuclides will maximize the organ dose calculation, especially considering that no other radionuclides has a higher dose parameter for any organ via any pathway than 1-131 for the I
thyroid via the milk pathway.
The location of exposure pathways and the maximum organ dose calculation may be- based on I
the available pathways in the surrounding environment of Hope Creek as identified by the annual land-use census (CONTROL 3.12.2). Otherwise, the dose will be evaluated based on the predetermined controlling pathways as identified in Table 2-3.
I
... .I ,
I I
.)
z U-I z
I 0
t r
U 0
z
U-"
Ld C1L 0
L.J Page 134',of 153 I
I1 Lj
. . g
I I
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 TABLE D-1: Infant Dose Contributions I Fraction of Total Organ and Body Dose I PATHWAYS I TagtOrgans Grass - Cow - Milk Ground Plane Total Body 0.02 0.15 I Bone 0.23 0.14 II Liver 0.09 0.15
< Thyroid Kidney 0.59.
0.02 0.15 0.15 Ii) Lung 0.01 0.14 V)
I6 GI-LLI 0.02 0.15 TABLE D-2 Fraction of Dose Contribution by Pathway Pathway Frae y.1 Grass-Cow-Milk 0.92 Ground Plane 0.08 Inhalation N/A
..n 0
z IAm w
0!
1 0,Il Page 135 of 153 L'i-n
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 S
APPENDIX E RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM -
SAMPLE TYPE, LOCATION AND ANALYSIS V')
S w
(-5 Z0 0
C-)
7
-r 0
0 t
bi U-0 w
I 0
Page 136 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 i W PPENDIX E: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program SAMPLE DESIGNATION Samples are identified by a three part code. The first two letters are the power station identification code,
in this case "SA". The next three letters are for the media sampled.
AIO = Air Iodine JDM = Immersion Dose (DLR)
APT = Air Particulates MLK = Milk ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab PWR = Potable Water (Raw)
ESF = Edible. Fish PWT = Potable Water (Treated)
ESS = SedimentSWA = Surface Water WWA = Well Water The last four symbols'are a location code based on direction and distance from the site center point. The midpoint of a line between Salem Units 1 & 2 containment domes was used as the site center point. Of these, the first two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction; i.e., 2=NNE, 3=NE, 4=ENE, 5=E, 6=ESE, 7=SE, 8=SSE, 9=S, 10=SSW, 11=SW, 12=WSW, 13=W, 14=WNW, 15=NW and 16=NNW. The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance I from the plant:
S = On-site location E = 4-5 miles off-site A = 0-1 miles off-site F = 5-10 miles off-site B = 1-2 miles !off-site G = 10-20 miles off-site C = 2-3 miles off-site H => 20 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site
.0 D The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; eig., 1,2,3. For example; the designation SA-WWA-5D1 would indicate a sample in the SGS and HCGS program (SA),
consisting of well water (WWA), which had been Collected in sector number 5, centered at 90' (due east) with respect to the reactor site at a radial distance of 3 to 4 miles off-site, (therefore, radial distance D).
The number 1 indicated that this is sampling station #1 in that particular sector.
SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sampling locations and specific information about the individual locations are given in Table E- 1.
LUJ Maps E- 1 and E-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the site.
0 L)
Page 137 of 153
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 TABLE E-1: REMP Sample Locations A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (IDM) I STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
MSi 0.55 mi. N 2S2 0.4 mi. NNE 2S4 0.59 mi. NNE; N of equipment laydown area 3S1 0.58 mi. NE 4SI 0.60 mi ENE; site access road near intersection to TB-02 5S1 0.95 mi. E; site access road 6S2 0.21 mi. ESE; observation building 7S1 0.12 mi. SE; station personnel gate 10S1 0.14 mi. SSW;, circ water bldg.
liSi 0.09 mi. SW; service water bldg.
15$1 0.57 mi. NW; near river and barge slip 16S1 0.54 mi. NNW; on road near fuel oil storage tank 4D2 3.7 mi. ENE; Aýloway Creek Neck Road 5D1 3.5 mi. E; local farm 1ODI 3.9 mi. SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur 14D1 3.4 mi. WNW;ýBay View, DE 15D 1 3.8 mi. NW; Rt 9, Augustine Beach, DE.
2E1 4.4 mi. NNE; local farm 3E1 4.1 mi. NE; local farm V 11E2 5.0 mi. SW; Rt. 9 0 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW; Thomas Landing z
13E1 4.2 mi. W; Diehl House Lab
- 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn IFi 5.8 mi. N; Fort'Elfsborg C 2F2 8.7 mi. NNE; Salem Substation 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE; Salem High School V 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; PSE&G Training Center Salem NJ z 3F2 5.1 mi. NE; Haficocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg.
o 3F3 8.6 mi. NE; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ
> 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 5F1 Sy 6.5 mi. E; Canton, NJ 0
GU-00 ni z
0,
(.0" 't
° Page 138 of 153 wki
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 TABLE E-1 (Cont'd)
A. Direct Radiation Monitoring Locations (IDM) (Cont'd)
STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
6F1 6.4 mi. ESE; Stow Neck Road 7F2 9.1 mi. SE; Bayside, NJ 9F1 5.3 mi. S;offRt.. 9, DE 10F2 5.8 mi. SSW; Rt. 9 1IF1 6.2 mi. SW; Taylors Bridge, DE 12F1 9.4 mi. WSW; Townsend Elementary School, DE 13F2 6.5 mi. W; Odessa, DE 13F3 9.3 mi. W; Redding Middle School 13F4 9.8 mi. W; Middletown, DE 14F2 6.6 mi. WNW; Boyds Comer 15F3 5.4 mi. NW I 16F2 8.1 mi. NNW; Delaware City Public School 1G3 19 mi. N; N. Church St. Wilmington, DE 301 17 mi. NE; local farm 1OGI 12 mi. SSW; Smyrna, DE

14G1 16G1 11.8 mi. WNW; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE 15 mi. NNW; Wilmington Airport 3H1 32 mi. NE; National Park, NJ I <
B. Air Sampling Locations (AIO,APT)
STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
<) 5S1 0.95 mi. E; site access road 5Di 3.5 mi. E; local farm 0o 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn 1F1 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg CY- 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; PSE&G Training Center Salem, NJ fo 1401 11.8 mi. WNW; Rte 286, Bethel Church Rd., DE Z
I,!
U-0 I4) iL Page 139 of 153-y._
U " .
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 Table E-1 (Cont'd) I C. Surface Water Locations (SWA) - Delaware River I
STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
IlAIl llAla.
0.2 mi. SW; Salem Outfall Area I Alternate 0.15 SW location in plant barge slip area 12C1 t2Cla 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River Alternate 3.7 mi.WSW at the tip of Augustine Beach Boat I Ramp 7E1 4.5 mi. SE; 1.0 mi. West of Mad Horse Creek 7E1 a :Alternate 8.87 mi SE at the end of Bayside Road 1F2 7.1 mi. N; midpoint of Delaware R.
16F 1 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal D. Ground Water Locations (WWA)
STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
3El
.4.1 mi NE of vent, local farm No groundwater samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem I I Generating Stations do not directly affect this pathway. However, this location (3E1) is being monitored as amanagement audit sample E. Drinking Water Locations (PWR, PWT)
I LU 0
z STATION CODE 2F3 STATION LOCATION*
8.0 mi NNE, City of Salem Water and Sewage Department I
No public drinking water samples or irrigation water samples are required as these pathways are not directly affected by liquid effluents discharged from Hope Creek and Salem Generating I
Stations. However, this location (2F3) is being monitored as a management audit sample o F. Water Sediment Locations (ESS)
Ld
" STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
0.2 mi. SW; Salem outfall area
. _u_15A1. 0.3 mi. NW; Hope Creek outfall area w" 16A1 0.7 mi. NNW; South Storm Drain outfall 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware river o 7E1 4.5 mi. SE; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek 16F1 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal 6S2 0.2 mi. ESE; observation building 0
0 LU Ly Page 140 of 153 03
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 Table E-1 (Cont'd)
G. Milk Sampling Locations (MLK)
STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
2G3 12.0 mi. NNE, local farm 13E3 4.9 mi W, local farm 14F4 7.6 mi. WNW; local farm 3G1 17 mi. NE; local farm H. Fish and Invertebrate Locations (ESF, ECH)
STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
hlAl 0.2 mi. SW; Salem outfall area 12C1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank'of Delaware River 7El 4.5 mi. SE; 1 mi West of Mad Horse Creek I. Food Product Locations STATION CODE STATION LOCATION*
The Delaware River at the location of Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants is a brackish water source. No irrigation of food products: is performed using water in the vicinity from which liquid plant wastes have been discharged. However, 12 management audit food samples are collected from various locations.
All distances and directions for the Station Locations are referenced to the midpoint between the two Salem units' containments. The WGS 84 coordinates for this site center point location are: Latitude N 390 - 27' - 46.5" and Longitude W 750 - 32' - 10.6".
r'l 0
I, 0
LL1 w
Page 141 of 153
!I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 I
S SAMPLES COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS I
Samp~le Collection Method Analysis Air Particulate Continuous low volume Gross Beta analysis I
air sampler. Sample on each weekly collected every week along with the filter sample. Gamma spectrometry shall I change. be performed if gross beta exceeds 10 times the yearly I mean of the control station value. Samples shall be analyzed 24 hrs or more after collection to allow for radon and thorium daughter decay. Gamma isotopic analysis on quarterly. I1 composites.
SAir Iodine A TEDA impregnated Iodine 131 analysis I1 charcoal cartridge is are performed on CD z connected to air each weekly sample.
particulate air sampler C-)
and is collected weekly 0z at filter change.
U_ Crab and Fish Two batch samples are Gamma isotopic sealed in a plastic analysis of edible bag or jar and frozen portion on collection.
semi-annually or when in season.
z Sediment A sediment sample is Gamma isotopic taken semi-annually. analysis semi-annually.
U-- Direct 2 DLR's will be Gamma dose quarterly.
collected from each location quarterly.
-J M
0 01-Page 142 of 153 UY-L0 CD C
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS (Cont'd)
-. Sample Collection Method Analysis Milk Sample of fresh milk Gamma isotopic is collected for each analysis and 1-1 31 farm semi-monthly when analysis on each cows are in pasture, sample on collection.
monthly at other times.
Water Sample to be collected Gamma isotopic (Potable, monthly providing winter monthly H-3 on Surface) icing conditions allow. quarterly surface sample, monthly on ground water sample.
Ln
<r
_7.
I; L/-
(-
0~D Izo Page 143of-153"
I Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 I FIGURE E-1: ONSITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS S
MAP B-1 ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 1
u)
LLJ z..
"-)
13 5 z
I I
0* I U-i
.0 9 "7-)
0L z
I 0,
n PIm.0I W*O4I 14HO AV FbRU m Page .144 of 153 I
w.
V- I
I :Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 FIGURE E-2: OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS ICR KHUNDED" I "DO *° R
. - .PENNS NEC
-- ~~ Vs.:}+.,-+P+*+**"++::+'[;::-+;*+**
>- + NATONAL VAJ,;
+**P+"~ ~~ VIP, Uoml+u++
£1£md Il .llmJ* +qOlt0 l l LMI"I0 l '- / n'-rn g~t.E * . .. ,J,.,,.I.....
d........Afl....~
Page-145 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 APPENDIX F MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE CONCENTRATIONS LIQUID EFFLUENTS I
I z I 0.
z}.
t-
"00
, -w(A uif w*
Iw' I zO 0
0_
I I
(A Page 146 of 153 f.
I
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 APPENDIX F: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) Values For Liquid Effluents
i. The following radionuclide concentrations were obtained from 10 CFR 20 Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 as revised January 1, 1991.
TABLE F-i: Maximum Permissible Concentrations Element Isotope Soluble Cone Insoluble Cone.
______.... __(gCi/ml) (W.Ci/ml)
Actinium (89) Ac-227 2E-6 3E-4
__ _ _ Ac-228 9E-5 9E-5 Americium (95) Am-241*;. 4E-6 3E-5 Am-242m 4E-6 9E-5 Am-242 lE-4 1E-4
..... Am-243 4E-6 3E-5
___ .. Am-244 5E-3 5E-3 Antimony (51) Sb-122. 3E-5 3E-5 Sb-124 2E-5 2E-5 Sb-125 IE-4 1E-4 Sb-126 3E-6 3E-6 Arsenic (33) As-73' 5E-4 5E-4 As-74 5E-5 5E-5 As-76 2E-5 2E-5 As-77:: 8E-5 8E-5 Astatine (85) At-2 11 2E-6 7E-5 Barium (56) Ba-13,1 2E-4 2E-4 Ba-140. 3E-5 2E-5 Berkelium (97) Bk-249 6E-4 6E-4 VI)
MW
0 Beryllium:(4)
Bismuth (83)
Bk-250 Be-7 Bi-206 2E-4 2E-3 4E-5 2E-4 2E-3 4E-5 Bi-207. 6E-5 6E-5 Bi-210 4E-5 4E-5
Bi-212. 4E-4 4E-4 I;
jw.
Bromine (35)
Cadmium (48)
Br-82 Cd-109 3E-4 2E-4 4E-5 2E-4
"_______ Cd-ll5m 3E-5 3E-5
, Cd- 115' 3E-5 4E-5 0 Calcium (20) Ca-45 9E-6 2E-4
__Ca-47 5E-5 3E-5 Californium (98) Cf-249 4E-6 2E-5 U- __ __ _ Cf-250 1E-5 3E-5
_Cf-251 4E-6 3E-5 Cf-252 7E-6 7E-6 wn Cf-253 IE-4 IE-4 Cf-254 1E-7 1E-7 Page 147 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 Table F-1 (Continued)
S Element Isotope Soluble Cone. Insoluble Conc.
(i.tCi/ml) (Oci/ml)
Carbon (6) C-14 8E-4 Cerium (58) Ce-141 9E-5 9E-5
.... _ Ce-143 4E-5 4E-5 Ce-144 1E-5 1E-5 Cesium (55).. Cs-131 2E-38 9E-4
._.._-. Cs-134m. 6E-3 1E-3
_ _Cs-134: 9E&6 .4E-5 Cs-135 1E-4 2E-4
Cs-136 .9E-5 6E-5 Cs-137 2E-5. 4E-5.::"
Chlorine (17) C1-36 8E-5 -.6E-5 CI-38. 4E-4 4E4 Chromium!(24) Cr-51, 2E-3 2E-3 Cobalt (27) Co-57 5E-4 4E-4:
Co-58m 3E-3 2E-3 Co-58 1E-4 9E-55 Co-60 5E-5 .3E.5 Copper (29) Cu-64 3E-4 .2E-4
.Curium (96) Cm-242 2E-5 2E-5 Cm-243 5E-6 2E-5...
.0 Cm-244 7E-6 3E-5
_______ Cm-245 4E-6 3E-5 Ow *_ _ Cm-246 4E-6 3E-5 CD z _ _ _ Cm-247 4E-6 2E-5
_Cm-248. 4E-7 1E-6 Cm-249 2E-3 2E-3 Dysprosium (66) Dy- 165 4E-4 4E-4
) Dy-166 4E-5". 4E-5 z Einsteinium (99) Es-253 2E-5 2E,5 Es-254m 2E-5 2E-5 Es-254 IE-5 1E-5 z
Es-255 3E-5 3E-5 :
Erbium (68) Er-169 9E-5 9E-5 0 Er-171 1E-4 1E-4 Europium (63) Eu-152 (9.2 hrs) 6E-5 6E-5 U- Eu-152 (13 yrs) 8E-5 8E-5S t-t LUj
_ _ _ Eu-154 2E-5 2E-5 CD _ __ _ Eu-155 2E-4 2E-4 Fermium (100) Fm-254 1E-4 1E-4 Fm-255 3E-5 3E-5, z _ _ _ Fm-256 9E-7 9E-7 Page 148 of 153' 0:
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 Table-F-i (Continued) i! Element Isotope Soluble Conc.
S(Ciml)
Insoluble Conc.
(P*Ci/mn)
Fluorine, (9) F-18 8E-4 5E-4 Gadolinium (64) Gd-t53 2E-4 2E-4
__Gd-159 8E-5 8E-5 Gallium (31) Ga-72 4E-5 4E-5 Germanium (32) Ge-71 2E-3 2E-3 Gold (79): Au-196 2E-4 1E-4 Au-198 5E-5 5E-5 Au-199 2E-4 2E-4 Hafnium (72) Hf-181 7E-5 7E-5 Holmium (67) Ho-166 3E-5 3E-5 Hydrogen (3) H-3 3E-3 3E-3 Indium (49) In-113m 1E-3 1E-3 In-114m 2E-5 2E-5 In-115m 4E-4 4E-4 In-115 9E-5 9E-5 Iodine (53). 1-125 2E-7 2E-4
" 1-126 3E-7 9E-5 1-129 6E-8 2E-4 1-131 3E-7 6E-5 1-132 8E-6 2E-4 1-133 1E-6 4E-5
(..5 1-134 2E-5 6E-4
_ _ _ 1-135 4E-6 7E-5 Iridiurn (77) Ir-190 2E-4 2E-4 1< __Ir-192 4E-5 4E-5 z"
Ir-194 3E-5 3E-5 c/) Iron (26) Fe-55 8E-4 2E-3 Fe-59 6E-5 SE-5 Lanthanum (57) La-140 2E-5 2E-5 La-141 3E-6 3E-6 I.n 1-0 Lead (82) Pb-203 4E-4 4E-4 Pb-210 1E-7 2E-4
, Pb-212 2E-5 2E-5 Lutetium (71) Lu-177 1E-4 IE-4 Manganese (25) Mn-52 3E-5 3E-5
> Mn-54 1E-4 1E-4 cy-r Mn-56 1E-4 1E-4 0LU' Mercury:(80) Hg-197m 2E-4 2E-4.
Hg-197 3E-4 5E-4 0
Hg-203 2E-5 1E-4 Molybdenum (42) Mo-99 2E-4 4E-5 n
LU Page 149 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23i i
Table F- 1 (Continued)
S Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.
I (jACi/ml) (ACi/ml)
Neodymium (60) Nd-144 7E-5 8E-5 Nd-147 Nd-149 6E-5 3E-4 6E-5 3E-4 I
Neptunium (93) Np-237 Np-239 3E-6 1E-4 3E-5 1E-4 I
Nickel (28) Ni-59 2E-4 2E-3 Ni-63 3E-5 7E-4, I Niobium (41)
Ni-65 Nb-93m.
Nb-95 Nb-97 1E-4 4E-4 1E-4 9E-4 1E-4 4E-4.
1E-4 9E-4
,I Osmium: (76) Os-185 7E-5 7E-5 Os-191m 3E-3 2E-3 Os-191 2E-4 2E-4 Os-193 6E-5 5E-5 Palladium (46) Pd-103 3E-4 3E-4 Pd-109 9E-5 7E-5 I Phosphorus (15)
Platinum (78)
P-32 Pt-191 2E-5 1E-4 2E-5 1E-4 Pt-193m 1E-3 1E-3 LU Pt-193 9E-4 2E-3 z Pt-197m lE-3. 9E-4 Pt-197 IE-4 1E-4 Plutonium (94) Pu-238 5E-6 3E-5 z
.0 Pu-239 Pu-240 5E-6 5E-6 3E-5 3E-5 I
Pu-241 2E-4 1E-3 0
C.D Pu-242 Pu-243 5E-6 3E-4 3E-5 3E-4 p I
Cv- Polonium (84) Po-210 7E-7 3E-5 Potassium (19) K-42 3E-4: 2E-5 0
Praseodymium(59) Pr-142 3E:5 3E-5 Pr-143 5E-5 5E-5 0
Promethium (61) Pm-147 2E-4, 2E-4 LU Pm-149 4E-5 4E-5 j0 1 Protactinium(91) Pa-230 2E-4 2E-4 i,
Pa-231 9E-7 2E-5 Pa-233 1E-4 lE-4 LU
<0 Uv-z -
-J LU LUJ Page 150 of 153 LU
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 Table F-I (Continued)
I. Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.
A(ICi/ml) (PCi/ml)
Radium (88) Ra-223 7E-7 4E-6 Ra-224 2E-6 5E-6 Ra-226 3E-8 3E-5 Ra-228 3E-8 3E-5 Rhenium (75) Re-183 6E-4 3E-4 Re-186 9E-5 5E-5 Re- 187 3E-3 2E-3 Re-188 6E-5 3E-5 Rhodium (45) Rh-103m 1E-2 lE-2 Rh-105 _E-4 IE-4 Rubidium (37) Rb-86 7E-5 2E-5 Rb.87 1E-4 2E-4 Ruthenium (44) Ru-97 4E-4 3E-4
_ _ __ Ru-103 8E-5 8E-5.
Ru-105 1E-4 1E-4
_Ru-106 I1E-5 1E-5
-Samarium (62) Sm-147 6E-5 7E-5 Sm-1_51 4E-4 4E-4 Sm-153 8E-5 8E-5 Scandium (21) Sc-46 4E-5 4E-5 V)
Sc-47 9E-5 9E-5 Sc-48 3E-5 3E-5 0 Selenium (34) Se-75 3E-4 3E-4
'.9. Silicon (14) Si-31 9E-4 2E-4 Silver (47) Ag- 105 1E-4 1E-4 Ag-110m 3E-5 *3E-5 Ag-l11 4E-5 4E-5 Sodium (11.) Na-22__ 4E-5 3E-5 IU Strontium (38)
Na-24 Sr-85m 2E-4 7E-3 3E-5 7E-3 Sr-85 . _ __1E-4 2E-4 1z0 Sr-89 3E-6 3E-5 Sr-90 3E-7 4E-5 Sr-91 7E-5 5E-5
- Sr-92 7E-5 6E-5 Lj Sulfur (16). S-35 6E-5 3E-4 IL tLjj Tantalum (73) Ta-182 4E-5 4E,5 V..
Page 151 of 153
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 H
Table F-1 (Continued)
Element- Isotope Soluble Conc.
(p~i/ml)
Insoluble Cone.
(Ci/rrd), I Technetium (43) Tc-96m 1E-2 1E-2
__Tc-96 1E-4 5E-5
__Tc-97m 4E-4 2E-4
_ _ _ Tc-97 2E-3 8E-4 Tc-99m 6E-3 3E-3
_Tc-99 3E-4 2E-4 Tellurium (52) Te-125m 2E-4 1E-4 Tc-127m 6E-5 5E-5 Te-127 3E-4 2E-4 Te-129m 3E-5 2E-5 Te-129 8E-4 8E-4 Te-131m 6E-5 4E-5 Te-132 3E-5 2E-5 Terbium (65) Tb-160 4E-5 4E-5 Thallium (81) TI-200 4E-4 2E-4 T1-201 3E-4 2E-4 TI-202 1E-4 7E-5 TI-204 1E-4 6E-5 Thorium (90) Th-227 2E-5 2E-5 Th-228 7E-6 1E-5 Th-230 2E-6 3E-5 Th-231 2E-4 2E-4
.) Th-232 2E-6 4E-5 Th-natural 2E-6 2E-5 Th-234 2E-5 2E-5 zi, Thulium (69)_ Tm-170 5E-5 5E-5 Tm-171
_ 5E-4 5E-4 Tin (50) Sn-113 9E-5 8E-5 Sn-124 2E-5 2E-5 Tungsten (74) W-181 4E-4 3E4 0
W-185 W-187 1E-4 7E-5 1E-4 6E-5 I
Uranium (92) U-230 5E-6 5E-6 U-232 3E-5 3E-5 U-233 3E-5 3E-5 U-234 3E-5 3E-5 0
w U-235 3E-5 . 3E-5 U-236 3E-5 3E-5 U-238 4E-5 4E-5 U-240 3E-5 3E-5 01 z .. )
n U-natural 3E-5 3E-5 V)
, Page 152of 153 D
Hope Creek ODCM Rev 23 Table F-1 (Continued)
I.O Element Isotope Soluble Conc. Insoluble Conc.
_ _(_Ci/ml) (GCi/ml)
Vanadium (23) V-48 3E-5 3E-5 Ytterbium (70) Yb-175 1E-4 1E-4 Yttrium Y-90 2E-5 2E-5 Y-91m 3E-3 3E-3 Y-91 3E-5 3E-5 Y-92 6E-5 6E-5 Y-93 3E-5 3E-5 I Zinc (30) Zn-65 1E-4 2E-4 Zn-69m 7E-5 6E-5 Zn-69 2E-3 2E-3 Zirconium (40) Zr-93 8E-4 8E-4 Zr-95 6E-5 6E-5 Zr-97 2E-5 2E-5 0 Any single radio-nuclide not listed 3E-6 3E-6 II O above with decay mode other than 0 alpha emission or spontaneous fission I
I. and with radio -
active half-life greater than 2 hour2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months s_
Any single radio- 3E-8 3E-8 nuclide not listed above, which decays V) by alpha emission or spontaneous fission.
I z Notes:
I_ 1. If the identity of any radionuclide is not known, the limiting values for purposes of this table shall be: 3E-8 ýtCi/ml.
2. If the identity and concentration of each radionuclide are known, the limiting values should be Li derived as follows: Determine, for each radionuclide in the mixture, the ratio between the quantity U-present in the mixture and the limit otherwise established in Appendix B for the specific radionuclide not in a mixture. The sum of such ratios for all the radionuclides in the mixture may not exceed "1" (i.e. "unity").
",-(
-. 1 LU Page 153 of 153

ML101300374

Text

Navigation menu

Search