ML073100210

Comment (9) Regarding Iplr Scoping

ML073100210
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	10/05/2007
From:	Public Commenter Public Commenter
To:	Division of License Renewal
References
72FR45075
Download: ML073100210 (3)

Text

From: <mishiam@aol.com>

To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Date: 10/5/2007 3:20:25 PM

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham

Dear Bo Pham,

Without reservation,I request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission examine itself and instead of promoting the usage of Nuuclear energy in densely populated areas such as NY, do what it was designed to do, and rather protect the population of Westchester and the surrounding 100mile radius of Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant and shut it down, decommission it and convert it to another energy sou8rce within which the population can without question, safely co-habitate! No workable or viable evacuation plan exists for this population. As a Poughkeepsie, NY resident attempting to get an additional 100 miles from a cataclismic event at IP, residents would be stuck on Route 9, trying in a futile attempt, to make it past Hudson NY on a 2 lane roadway clogged with tens of thousands of it's citizens trying to do the very same. Would any members of the regulatory body of the NRC like to buy real estate after a WPA in a post Nuclear Westchester/Putnam/Dutchess/Ulster/Orange/Columbia County! Please consider the following:

1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),

conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006

National Academy of Sciences report.

Sincerely, Michelle Squires 3902 Cherry Hill Drive Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 Sincerely, Michelle Squires Poughkeepsie, NY 12603

Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 9 Mail Envelope Properties (47304039.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000000.1.144864.1)

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/5/2007 3:20:25 PM From: <mishiam@aol.com>

Created By: mishiam@aol.com Recipients

<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1985 10/5/2007 3:20:25 PM Mime.822 2806 11/6/2007 10:21:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard