Similar Documents at Salem |
|---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22207A0312022-07-22022 July 2022
NRC-2022-000092 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed
LR-N22-0016, Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility2022-02-24024 February 2022
Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility
RS-20-140, Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements2020-10-30030 October 2020
Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements
ML19101A4052019-04-10010 April 2019
Annual Assessment Meeting Attendee List
ML18156A0142018-05-30030 May 2018
30-2018 Annual Assessment Meeting Attendee List
ML17097A2102017-04-0707 April 2017
List of Attendees for Annual Assessment Meeting for Salem, Hope Creek
ML16096A0412016-03-30030 March 2016
Attendance List for Salem_Hope Creek Aam March 30, 2016
ML16049A4582016-02-18018 February 2016
FOIA/PA-2016-0261 - Resp 1 - Final, Salem 2011 Annual Environmental Operating Report
ML13364A2832013-12-30030 December 2013
Announcement of 2014 Generic Fundamentals Examination Administration Dates-Letter Dated Dec 30, 2013
ML13059A2972013-02-26026 February 2013
SL-011725, Rev. 0, Salem, Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis External Events, EA-12-049 Overall Integrated Plan Response.
ML13052A7942013-02-21021 February 2013
Complete Set of NRC Questions_2-21-13
ML12334A4512012-11-21021 November 2012
SL-2012-10795, Rev. 0, Sgs Flood Walkdown Report, 10 CFR 50.54(f) Section 2.3 (Flood) Response.
ML12366A2972012-11-0808 November 2012
Bypass Testing Information
ML12290A1442012-10-0404 October 2012
EN-AA-602-0006, Revision 0, Cultural and Historic Resources
ML12138A0062012-05-15015 May 2012
Aam Attendance Sheet, May 15, 2012
ML12129A3892012-04-27027 April 2012
Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02
LR-N12-0124, Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-022012-04-27027 April 2012
Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02
ML12129A3902012-04-27027 April 2012
Attachments 1 Through Attachment 8, Response to Generic Letter 2004-02
ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012
Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status
ML1113601032011-05-10010 May 2011
2011 Salem/Hope Creek Annual Assessment Meeting Attendance List
ML1030003382010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Salem NRC Punchlist
ML1030003372010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Configuration Change #80101381 Rev 1
ML1030003392010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0 Salem Unit 2
ML1030003402010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2, Draft
ML1030003412010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2, with Handwritten Notes
ML1030003422010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2 with Handwritten Notes
ML1030004062010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: SAP685996
ML1030004072010-10-22022 October 2010
Large Bore Pipe Detail Index List Psbp No. 132419, Aux Feedwater
ML1030004092010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Label Request Form, Label 12AF155 S1 Aix
ML1030004052010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2 with Handwritten Notes
ML1030004022010-09-21021 September 2010
Document PSEG Notification 20462034 Basis AFW Discharge Line Design Pressure
ML1030104962010-08-18018 August 2010
Document: 1R20 AF Buried Pipe Insp Results, Notification #20457262, Salem 1- Auxiliary Feedwater
ML1030104972010-08-18018 August 2010
Document: Operation Key Info, Buried Pipe Program Inspection Reports for 12 and 14 Aux Feedwater Lines
ML1016002752010-06-17017 June 2010
List of Attendees for NRC Public Management No. Nm 10-019; Salem Nuclear Generating Station Discussion of Independent Spent Fuel Storage on 05/27/10
ML1030002042010-05-24024 May 2010
Document: Design Analysis Minor Revision, Subject: Qualification of Safety-Related Buried Commodities for Tornado Missile and Seismic Evaluation
ML1030004032010-05-0505 May 2010
Document: PSEG Notification 2041785
ML1029502392010-04-29029 April 2010
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML1034404482010-04-24024 April 2010
Document: Salem Unit 1 12/14 AF Piping Reroute, #80101382 Rev 2
ML1029804652010-04-23023 April 2010
RM Documentation No. SA-SURV-2010-001, Rev. 1, Risk Assessment of Missed Surveillance - Auxiliary Feedwater Discharge Line Underground Piping Pressure Testing.
ML1034404512010-04-23023 April 2010
Document: Ansys Input Files and Calculation Package Drafts
ML1030002032010-04-22022 April 2010
Document: Stress and Support Summary
ML1029804892010-04-22022 April 2010
Operability Evaluation with Tracked Changes
ML1029802612010-04-21021 April 2010
Notification 000020459689, Submitted by Edley Giles
ML1030002012010-04-20020 April 2010
Document: Ultrasonic Thickness Examination Record, Order #60084266, Procedure #OU-AA-335-004
ML1029505412010-04-12012 April 2010
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML1029503942010-04-0707 April 2010
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010
List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants
ML0913201102009-05-0505 May 2009
Aam Sign-in Sheets, 05/05/2009
ML0812207452008-05-0101 May 2008
Sign-In Sheet, April 30, 2008
ML0806704192008-03-0707 March 2008
CDBI Findings
2022-07-22
[Table view] |
Text
AI I~Io September 24, 2002 At 5 pm. on 9/24/03, I attended a meeting with the Salem Operations Leadership Team, led by ii It was obvious to me that one hfe in charge of the plant and crew for the night, whose name is&, was quite upset.-He s'poke towards the.
Cnd of the meeting.of feeling at the end of his rope with his crew. He didn't know what to do. I offered to stay late and meet with his crew of guys,. all Union.
I met with them for nearly 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />. They werz very upset about events that had occurred over the weekend. Their point of view was that th ..
performed an unsafe act by shutting a valve with a steam leak.instead of allowingO and his crew of shut down the unit. Their concerns were for and his safety, for the bad example he was setting, for the pressure he seemingly was under to feel a need to jeopardize his safety to save plant production. They "vented" for most of the time. I largely listened and asked questions.
That evening I met:with Slso and the next day I briefed and* Much discussion and fallout ensued that went on for weeks. Employee Concerns was called in to investigate.
The next day I received the attached emails -the Union guys.. They reveal additional safety issues. /they also shdw that I was viewed as ar and was expected to relay info to him that others, out of fear or chain of command or .whatever, did not get to himii themselves.
I spok with about these concerns on or around 10/1. He seemed annoyed that I believed
- the Union guys were geniunely concerned aboutim and his safety. His view Was that they were the problem, not management. I p6inted ut.he ne d formanagement..to engage with them and the'intense coaching I was ai apd-Lo .sit down- and. talk vs. stonewall.
and had agreed to do this. d not ask clarifying questions or seem interested
'in hearing more. 1 6nce.again felt I wasbeing discounted.
UOrin thig record vas deleted.
fn ()...
B Wdorde With the, Freedomof Info* a*. -:
