Similar Documents at Salem |
|---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22207A0312022-07-22022 July 2022
NRC-2022-000092 - Resp 1 - Final, Agency Records Subject to the Request Are Enclosed
LR-N22-0016, Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility2022-02-24024 February 2022
Radiological Survey of Site Property to Be Used for Offshore Wind Port Facility
RS-20-140, Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements2020-10-30030 October 2020
Proposed Changes to Decommissioning Trust Agreements
ML19101A4052019-04-10010 April 2019
Annual Assessment Meeting Attendee List
ML18156A0142018-05-30030 May 2018
30-2018 Annual Assessment Meeting Attendee List
ML17097A2102017-04-0707 April 2017
List of Attendees for Annual Assessment Meeting for Salem, Hope Creek
ML16096A0412016-03-30030 March 2016
Attendance List for Salem_Hope Creek Aam March 30, 2016
ML16049A4582016-02-18018 February 2016
FOIA/PA-2016-0261 - Resp 1 - Final, Salem 2011 Annual Environmental Operating Report
ML13364A2832013-12-30030 December 2013
Announcement of 2014 Generic Fundamentals Examination Administration Dates-Letter Dated Dec 30, 2013
ML13059A2972013-02-26026 February 2013
SL-011725, Rev. 0, Salem, Mitigation Strategies for Beyond Design Basis External Events, EA-12-049 Overall Integrated Plan Response.
ML13052A7942013-02-21021 February 2013
Complete Set of NRC Questions_2-21-13
ML12334A4512012-11-21021 November 2012
SL-2012-10795, Rev. 0, Sgs Flood Walkdown Report, 10 CFR 50.54(f) Section 2.3 (Flood) Response.
ML12366A2972012-11-0808 November 2012
Bypass Testing Information
ML12290A1442012-10-0404 October 2012
EN-AA-602-0006, Revision 0, Cultural and Historic Resources
ML12138A0062012-05-15015 May 2012
Aam Attendance Sheet, May 15, 2012
ML12129A3892012-04-27027 April 2012
Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02
LR-N12-0124, Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-022012-04-27027 April 2012
Salem Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Attachment 1 to LR-N12-0124, Generic Letter 2004-02, Updated Supplemental Response for Salem Regarding Generic Letter 2004-02
ML12129A3902012-04-27027 April 2012
Attachments 1 Through Attachment 8, Response to Generic Letter 2004-02
ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012
Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status
ML1113601032011-05-10010 May 2011
2011 Salem/Hope Creek Annual Assessment Meeting Attendance List
ML1030003382010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Salem NRC Punchlist
ML1030003372010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Configuration Change #80101381 Rev 1
ML1030003392010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0 Salem Unit 2
ML1030003402010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2, Draft
ML1030003412010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2, with Handwritten Notes
ML1030003422010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2 with Handwritten Notes
ML1030004062010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: SAP685996
ML1030004072010-10-22022 October 2010
Large Bore Pipe Detail Index List Psbp No. 132419, Aux Feedwater
ML1030004092010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Label Request Form, Label 12AF155 S1 Aix
ML1030004052010-10-22022 October 2010
Document: Operability Evaluation, Opeval, Rev 0, Salem Unit 2 with Handwritten Notes
ML1030004022010-09-21021 September 2010
Document PSEG Notification 20462034 Basis AFW Discharge Line Design Pressure
ML1030104962010-08-18018 August 2010
Document: 1R20 AF Buried Pipe Insp Results, Notification #20457262, Salem 1- Auxiliary Feedwater
ML1030104972010-08-18018 August 2010
Document: Operation Key Info, Buried Pipe Program Inspection Reports for 12 and 14 Aux Feedwater Lines
ML1016002752010-06-17017 June 2010
List of Attendees for NRC Public Management No. Nm 10-019; Salem Nuclear Generating Station Discussion of Independent Spent Fuel Storage on 05/27/10
ML1030002042010-05-24024 May 2010
Document: Design Analysis Minor Revision, Subject: Qualification of Safety-Related Buried Commodities for Tornado Missile and Seismic Evaluation
ML1030004032010-05-0505 May 2010
Document: PSEG Notification 2041785
ML1029502392010-04-29029 April 2010
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML1034404482010-04-24024 April 2010
Document: Salem Unit 1 12/14 AF Piping Reroute, #80101382 Rev 2
ML1029804652010-04-23023 April 2010
RM Documentation No. SA-SURV-2010-001, Rev. 1, Risk Assessment of Missed Surveillance - Auxiliary Feedwater Discharge Line Underground Piping Pressure Testing.
ML1034404512010-04-23023 April 2010
Document: Ansys Input Files and Calculation Package Drafts
ML1030002032010-04-22022 April 2010
Document: Stress and Support Summary
ML1029804892010-04-22022 April 2010
Operability Evaluation with Tracked Changes
ML1029802612010-04-21021 April 2010
Notification 000020459689, Submitted by Edley Giles
ML1030002012010-04-20020 April 2010
Document: Ultrasonic Thickness Examination Record, Order #60084266, Procedure #OU-AA-335-004
ML1029505412010-04-12012 April 2010
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML1029503942010-04-0707 April 2010
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010
List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants
ML0913201102009-05-0505 May 2009
Aam Sign-in Sheets, 05/05/2009
ML0812207452008-05-0101 May 2008
Sign-In Sheet, April 30, 2008
ML0806704192008-03-0707 March 2008
CDBI Findings
2022-07-22
[Table view] |
Text
Salem NRC Punchlist Ref # Action Reqd Comments 25 What is the soil difference between yard and 'no mans land' area?
32 How tong was 1994 repair designed to last?
In 1994, when repair was done, were future 33 inspection requirements established to check coating? Was repaired pipe re-inspected?
In 1994, was there a corrosion rate calibrated based 34 on time in ground and was this applied going forward to determine how tong it would last?
35 Was remaining walt thickness calculated in 1994?
Only specific locations were inspected. Lining appear intact except those areas that were repaired - this could be indicative of the pipe coating being effective 36 What percent of pipe inspected in 1994? If only three in protecting buried pipe. Specific locations [The locations, is it representative of total length? inspector calculated that PSEG inspected about 45' of AFW pipe from a total of 340' AFW pipe in 1994 -
Do we agree with his deduction - this would be around 13% of pipe inspected]
Regarding the FEA, please be prepared to provide [Similar to Ref# 110 - Inspector looking for 46 detait on the remaining margins in the AF piping design and how this has affected the margin. mething in writing.]
55 Please provide the FSAR design basis and system Copy of UFSAR write-up provided.
description for the original AFW system?
59 Please provide the basis for the 1950 psi design pressure for the AFW system.
Please provide copy of documentation for new coating on piping and how tong coating is good for.
Salem Unit I coating - What are parameters for coating? How do we know it wilt meet our needs?
NRC ISI Inspector needs signed off copies of the 103 backfill procedure verifying that cure times have Copy provided at 05/04 meeting with PSEG staff.
been met.
Can you have M. Ahmed explain how the results of M. Ahmed discussed this with NRC Inspector. No 110 this analysis affected the margin on the system? additional follow-up questions. [Similar to Ref# 46 -
Inspector looking for something in writing.]
Page 1 of 2
Salem NRC Punchlist 112 Inspector evaluated requested flow the addition of catc new evaluation that pipe / fittings, etc. Copy provided at 05/04 meeting with PSEG staff.
For high point fill/vent as result of pipe rerouting - Discussed with Inspector. PSEG has considered these 117 air ion the tine - Water Hammer concern / Air mooking impacts. Should not be issue [Inspector for binding concerns - Has PSEG considered these in the A.pacts. Shoud notbissue.n design.
This was discussed on Friday 04/30. Engineering believes this is a matter of margin management.
The increase in probability without shielding is 18 Msse Protection - What are we planning on doing slightly greater but within a very low probability 118 with respect to misse shields? range, and proceeding acceptable. The missilewithout shields the will shields is to the be added roof of FHB to add margin back to AFW pipe above ground. [Inspector looking for A. Johnson follow-up on this item.]
Page 2 of 2
.A
Ultrasonic Examination WS~itnit MUES 2 Prcedur: NDE-UT-00 Outage No.: U2-14ftl0 Summrnuy No,; 2M.14.000O9 Procedure Rev.: 0 Report No.: VE-0H-WokKc~pe: 131 Work Order No.: Page: I of I Code, AME XI 190=1/00 Add CatJRtM: R-AfRI.16 Location: ft-516 Drawing No.: c.205710 Dscri~plon: SE-MOZ SysWtc ID, RPV-E Component 10-: N2J NOZ4l SIZ&A-ength: _ ____ ThikresWD~arneter:_____
Limitatlions:
Comawnts:
APPRVAL SIGNATURES PER ATTACHED GE HIACHI EXAMINATIMN $MEET Resuits: NRI ~ R) I Inful ____________________
Por**Mi Of Coverae Obluined 0:
M Yes Reviuwud Previous Data: Yes____
Examiner Le461, I-L ~e MInurRe~mws S*WuMeu Date Rsymnid. Tý4v, 44112090 HMAEY. ROBERT/EVEL 10 42&00 Examnef Loyal ftsinature Date Site Reayiew Signature a FMs, Cody 412112009 LINIDEN, RANDY TILEVURL NI 4i21MO0 Oter L WtNA' SOWntur ~lt DoeAIIIes WA___________________ TILLERY, VIELTON E 41130=209 Vancbr Exxm~wfc ra UT
