ML102950239

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Branch 3 Daily Status
ML102950239
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2010
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0334
Download: ML102950239 (4)


Text

-j Itý Outside of Scope II II BRANCH3 DAILY 4129/10 STATUS Highlighted items were discussed at DKPIDR5 Goordination meeting BL tm r o A.Outside of Scope BOLD items are new SALEM ONE. Weekend Coverage: Dan AL1=(9X)>0.07 AL2=(2of3)>0:11 AL3=(1X)>'.13 Outside of Scope 4-m-W follow-up issues

  • Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant - O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records but still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide the leak check procedure 4/27 am.
  • Evaluatb the 50.59 for AFW modifications - Scroeder reviewed no significant technical concerns or issues
  • Smart samples o Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replaced (how will PSEG certify the repair) - O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4/27 PM o Verify control air extent of condition - O'Hara 0 Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times - O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4127 pm o Verify control air clamping material - O'Hara, PSEGto provide supporting document 4/27 am o AFW pipe weld records - O'Hara, PSEG to assess status of documents by 4/27 pm Outside of Scope Irftlon inthis record was deleted in aoroance vffth the Freiep'o of Infomiation Act.

n-* .. V . . "_

16&f-' .

o mv FO4AJPA .'2-5-21 - '3W'j'

Outside of Scope

L. S_.gnificant Occurrences/Activities

Unit 2 AFW Testing PSEG determined that they did not perform ASME code required pressure drop test for the buried sections of the 22 and.24 headers.

  • Confirm the PSEG risk assessment to delay AFW testing for 1 year is reasonable - Cahill, complete, no concerns
  • Evaluate if performing a risk assessment to meet Technical Specification 4,0,5 is appropriate if a test was never performed verses missed - Conte/Ennis - discussions ongoing, no apparent ongoing compliance issues.

Operability - Initial assessment Unit 2 was that it is in better condition based on newer piping; 1994 inspection that, identified intact coating; and ISI code gives more allowance to an operating unit (can take credit for up to 90%of the yield stress).

" Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment - Schroeder no significant technical issues or concerns

  • Confirm the finite element analysis for the Unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methods and assumotions - Gray. O'Hara. and HQ reviewed, no sianificant technical issues or concerns Outside of Scope I L_ Additional Items Status Board Items:

I Salem 1. AFW buried pioing aeneric communications Outside of Scope

FclitsIie of --

"cope

Outside of St6pe