ML102950239
| ML102950239 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 04/29/2010 |
| From: | NRC Region 1 |
| To: | NRC Region 1 |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2010-0334 | |
| Download: ML102950239 (4) | |
Text
-j Itý Outside of Scope II II BRANCH3 DAILY STATUS 4129/10 Highlighted items were discussed at DKPIDR5 Goordination meeting BOLD items are new A.Outside of Scope BL tm r
o SALEM ONE.
Weekend Coverage: Dan AL1=(9X)>0.07 AL2=(2of3)>0:11 AL3=(1X)>'.13 Outside of Scope 4-m-W follow-up issues Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant - O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records but still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide the leak check procedure 4/27 am.
Evaluatb the 50.59 for AFW modifications - Scroeder reviewed no significant technical concerns or issues Smart samples o
Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replaced (how will PSEG certify the repair) - O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4/27 PM o
Verify control air extent of condition - O'Hara 0
Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times - O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4127 pm o
Verify control air clamping material - O'Hara, PSEGto provide supporting document 4/27 am o AFW pipe weld records - O'Hara, PSEG to assess status of documents by 4/27 pm Outside of Scope Irftlon in this record was deleted in aoroance vffth the Freiep'o of Infomiation Act.
mv n-*
V 16&f-'
FO4AJPA
.'2-5-21
- o
'3W'j'
Outside of Scope
- L. S_.gnificant Occurrences/Activities
Unit 2 AFW Testing PSEG determined that they did not perform ASME code required pressure drop test for the buried sections of the 22 and.24 headers.
Confirm the PSEG risk assessment to delay AFW testing for 1 year is reasonable - Cahill, complete, no concerns Evaluate if performing a risk assessment to meet Technical Specification 4,0,5 is appropriate if a test was never performed verses missed - Conte/Ennis - discussions ongoing, no apparent ongoing compliance issues.
Operability - Initial assessment Unit 2 was that it is in better condition based on newer piping; 1994 inspection that, identified intact coating; and ISI code gives more allowance to an operating unit (can take credit for up to 90%of the yield stress).
Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment - Schroeder no significant technical issues or concerns Confirm the finite element analysis for the Unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methods and assumotions - Gray. O'Hara. and HQ reviewed, no sianificant technical issues or concerns Outside of Scope I L_
Additional Items Status Board Items:
I Salem 1. AFW buried pioing aeneric communications Outside of Scope
Fclit s Iie of --
"cope
Outside of St6pe