ML061860497

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail from S. Sandlike of Entergy to Various, Regarding Update IPEC Ground Water Dose Calc
ML061860497
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/24/2006
From: Sandlike S
Entergy Corp
To: Jason White
NRC/FSME
References
FOIA/PA-2006-0195, IPEC-CHM-06-012
Download: ML061860497 (16)


Text

lohn White - Update IPEC ground water dose calc

.. ... .. .... .f , - --- " *--

Page I

--"t ...Page 1" loh W hite,-*.. ...at IPE

. -Up grun water dose

. -. ca...

ic...

From: "Sandike, Steven Richard" <SSandik@entergy.com>

To: <JRW1 @nrc.gov>, "Mayer, Donald M" <DMayerl @entergy.com>, "Loope, Dennis"

<dloope@entergy.com>, "Gray, Dara F" <DGray@entergy.com>, "Lavera, Ronald"

<RLavera @ entergy.com>, "Quinn, Dennis M" <dquin9l @entergy.com>, <dquinn @daq-inc.com>,

"ADLER, JOESPH J" <adler@tlgservices.com>

Date: 4/24/06 3:40PM

Subject:

Update IPEC ground water dose calc We updated the concentrations with some new data, as described. Same model, for now.

<<Updated Dose Calc.pdf>>

Steve Sandike Effluents / RMS ENN Indian Point Energy Center Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 phone: 914-736-8455 fax: 914-734-6010 email: ssandik@entergy.com CC: "Wilson, Daniel" <DWilson@entergy.com>

_--n---

Indian Point NPP Entergy Apr 24, 2006 IPEC-CHM-06-012 MEMORANDUM TO: D. WILSON - CHEMISTRY SUPERINTENDENT JJ, FROM: S. SANDIKE - Sr. CHEMISTRY SPECIALISTY

SUBJECT:

UPDATED GROUND WATER DOSE EVALUATION - APRIL 2006 Based on the detection of Sr-90 in monitoring wells MW-37 and MW-50, a decision was made to evaluate whether the existing assessment of offsite dose was still appropriate. The assessment method is the same; that is, it uses a water balance method, where total rainfall in the Indian Point watershed area is partitioned between groundwater (GW) from infiltration, and storm water (SW). The assessment addresses the approximate flows of GW and SW into various areas of the site, based on physical size and locations of the reactor units.

The inputs to the assessment have changed in some cases. For example, tritium going through the Unit 2 area had been based on monitoring well data in the transformer yard (i.e., MW-1 11 and others). More recently, the wells along the riverfront area have been completed, and the values from wells MW-36, 37, 49, 50 and MW-52, are considered more relevant to the actual releases to the Hudson River. As a result of the more recent data, and the fact that Sr-90 was detected in the riverfront wells, the inputs to the assessment have changed. Details of this assessment are attached.

The resulting annual dose summary indicates very little change from the March 2006 assessment:

Parameter: '-'March2006 Eval -';April 2006 Eval LPercentimit"I.

Total Body Dose 2.1E-3 mrem 2.5E-3 mrem 0.08%

Adult Bone Dose 9.7E-3 mrem 1.1E-2 mrem 0.11%

Doses are still approximately 0.1% percent of the applicable NRC effluents limits of 3 millirem per year (whole body) and 10 millirem per year (highest organ). The actual curies and doses will still, of course, be included in the annual effluent report. Our site hydrologist will also continue to pursue a more detailed method of determining precise flow through each effected well, and, when completed, this method will be incorporated into the dose model for ongoing application.

SS/ss cc: D. Mayer D. Loope D. Gray R. Lavera D. Quinn J. Adler

Update on Assessment of Offsite Dose from Groundwater and Storm Water Pathways Based on the detection of Sr-90 in monitoring wells MW-37 and MW-50, a decision was made to evaluate whether the existing assessment of offsite dose was still appropriate.

The assessment method is the same; that is, it uses a water balance method, where total rainfall in the Indian Point watershed area is partitioned between groundwater (GW) from infiltration, and storm water (SW). The assessment addresses the approximate flows of GW and SW into various areas of the site, based on physical size and locations of the reactor units.

The inputs to the assessment have changed in some cases. For example, tritium going through the Unit 2 area had been based on monitoring well data in the transformer yard (i.e., MW- 11I and others). More recently, the wells along the riverfront area have been completed, and the values from wells MW-36,37,49,50 and MW-52, are considered more relevant to the actual releases to the Hudson River. As a result of the more recent data, and the fact that Sr-90 was detected in the riverfront wells, the inputs to the assessment have changed. The current inputs are shown in Table 1, below. The "Cale Sheet" references in the "Comments" column refer to spreadsheets developed by Chemistry to calculate the offsite doses in different pathways.

Table I Inputs to Dose Assessment for Groundwater and Storm Water Discharges to River and to Discharge Canal Dilution Near Release Discharge Volume Term DiI. Rate H-3 Sr-90 NI-63 Unit Water Type Point (gal/day) Factor (gpm) (pC/L) (pCI/IL) (pCiIL) Comments Groundwater River 1.11E+05 1.0 5.98 34,100 30 56.5 Calc Sheet Al-1 Discharge Calc Sheet A1&3-2 added 3.57 +

Storm Water Canal 1.39E+06 50 3.57 1,560 0 0 36.19 together for one calc Unit2 Groundwater Storm Water River River f 1.11E+05 1.11E+05 1.0 1.0 3.37 11.27 58,100 651 5

0 0

0 CalcSheetA2.1 Calc Sheet A2-2 Discharge Storm Water Canal 1.39E+06 5.0 5.93 2,900 0 0 Cafc Sheet A2-3 Groundwater River 1.11E+05 1.0 7.82 620 0 0 Carc Sheet A3-1 Discharge Caic Sheet A1&3-2 added 3.57 +

Storm Water Canal 1.39E+06 5.0 36.19 1,560 0 0 36.19 gpm together for one calc The results summary is shown in Table 2, and indicates that the doses have marginally increased from the previous assessment, based on the Sr-90 detected in additional riverfront wells. Note that the doses are still approximately 0.1% percent of the applicable NRC effluents limits of 3 millirem per year (whole body) and 10 millirem per year (highest organ). Table 3 shows the comparison of the current assessment (April 2006) to the previous assessment (March 2006).

Table 2 Summary Dose Assessment from IPEC Groundwater and Stormwater WB Dose Bone Dose Water Source Nuclide pCi/liter 913m Ci Dilution Tpe mrem)

H-3 34,100 0.41 Unit 1 - Groundwater Sr-90 30 5.98 3.6E-04 Non-Discharge 2.2E-03 1.OE-02

________Canal Ni-63 56.5 6.7E-04 Unit I and Unit 3 - Storm Water H-3 1,560 39.8 0.12 Discharge Canal 2.2E-08 H-3 58,100 0.39 Unit 2 Groundwater - Non-Discharge Transformer Yard Sr-90 5 3.4E-05 Canal 2.1E04 8.4E04 Ni-63 0 O.OE+00 Unit 2 Storm Water - Non-Discharge Zone B - East and West H-3 651 11.3 1.5E-02 Canal 1.6E-07 Unit 2 Storm Water -

Zone C - Middle H-3 2,900 5.9 3.4E-02 Discharge Canal 6.1E-09 Non-Discharge Unit 3 Groundwater H-3 620 7.82 9.6E-03 Canal 1.08E-07 H-3 Cl 0.96 Total Dose 2.5E-03 1.1E-02 Sr-90 Cl 0.00039 Limit 3 10 Ni-63 Ci1 0.00067  % of Limit 0.08% 0.11%

Table 3 Comparison of Offsite Dose Assessments March April 2006 % of Dose Parameter 2006 Eval. Eval. Limit Total H-3 Activity in Release Path (Ci) 1.53 0.96 N/A Total Sr-90 Activity in Release Path Ci) 3.4E-04 3.9E-04 N/A Total Ni-63 Activity in Release Path Ci) 6.7E-04 6.7E-04 N/A Whole Body Dose (mrem/yr) 2.1 E-03 2.5E-03 0.08%

Adult Bone Dose (mrem/yr) 9.7E-03 1.1 E-02 0.11%

'--N Inn. .t~ In flnc~ A~~z~mnnt fnr (~rn;mndw~it~r lnd ~tnrm W~t~r fli~r~h~rn~ In Rivnr sand In flkr~h~rn~

C~nzd Dilution Near Release Discharge Volume Term Dil. Rate H-3 Sr-90 Ni-63 Unit Water Type Point (gallday) Factor (gpm) (pCi/L) (pCIIL) (pCIIL) Comments Groundwater River 1.11E+05 1.0 3.98 34,100 30 56.5 Calc Sheet A1-1 Discharge 'Calc Sheet Al &3-2 added 3.57 +

Storm Water Canal 1.39E+06 _5.0 3.57 1,560 0 0 36.19 together for one calc Groundwater River 1.11 E+05 1.0 3.37 58,100 5 0 Calc Sheet A2-1 Unit 2 Storm Water River 1.11E+05 1.0 11.27 651 0 0 Calc Sheet A2-2 Discharge Storm Water Canal 1.39E+06 5.0 5.93 2,900 0 0 Calc Sheet A2-3 Ui3*****Groundwater i River 1.11 E+05 1.0 *7.82 *620 0 j0 Calc Sheet A3-1

! ~Discharge ,i Calc Sheet Al1&3-2 added 3.57 +

S Storm Water , Canal 1.39E+06 ,5.0 36.19 1,560 0 0- 36.19 gpm together for one calc

I I IAdjusted Adjusted Adjusted

%SW to % SW to GW (to SW (to SW (to Dis.

~~~~~~~~~

3VW"~AI I1SI- - - .

IIr-S AlM,,1JC1flMC*.LU 11 111 1 1 .1 Unit 1 241 7.15 50% 50% 5.98 N/A 3.57 H-3 Conc (pCl) 34.,100 NIA 1'560 For GW from U1, use the highest value from MW 37, 49, or 50, as representative of the concentration of GW going to the river In H-3 0.41 N/A 0.011 the Unit 1 area. GZA (MB) stated that at the current level of understanding, the most likely source of water at MW-37 is from St-90 pCIAL 30 N/A 0 Unit 1. and MW-36 should be associated with Unit 2.

For SW, manholes In Zones C. D. E (same as In previous Sr-O Cr 3.57E-04 - N/A 0 evaluation)

Ni-63 PC5L l6.5 N/A 0 NI-63 based on highest level of 56.5 pCI/L at MW-37.

NI-36.73E-04 N/A 0 651 pCI/ for East and West - direct to Hudson River (same as Unit 2 - East 2.81 100% 0% 0.00 2.81 N/A Previous evaluation) 2900 pCI/ for Middle- goes to Discharge Canal (same as Unit 2- Middle 7.91 75% 25% 1.98 N/IA 5.9 prevlous evaluation) 651 pCI/I for East and West - direct to Hudson River (same as Unit 2 - West 8.461 I 0% I 0.00 8.46 N/A orevious evaluation!

Unit 2 - Total 3.37 11.3 5.19 For GW, used MW-36 as the closest point to release. See notes H-3 (pCiVL) E/W 58100 651 N/A on Unit 1 above.

N/A 2*900 H-3 (pCi/L) Mid H-3 Cl/yr ENW 0.39 0.015 0.034 H-3 Cl/yr Mid NIA 0 H-3 Cl/yr Total 0.39 N/PA 0 SO-0 pCV/L 5 N/A 0 Sr-90 based on highest level of 4.1 pCI/L at MW-36.

SO-gO Cl/yr 3.35E-05 N/A 0 Ni-63 pCVl. 0.0 N/A 0 NI-63 not Identified at MW-37 or transformer yard samples.

I I - I I I - I I unit 3 .o I 7.8 NI/A 36.2 H-3 Conc (pCi/L)

I I GW- MW-38, 620 pCi/I. SW- 1,560 pCI/I (same as in previous 620 N/A 1,560 evaluation).

H-3 Cllyr 0.010 J N/A 0.112

,Sr-90 pCi/. , 0 . NIA. 0 0 N/A 0 Previous 4-24-06 Eval. Eval.

Total H-3 Activity In Release Path (CI) 1.53 0.96 Total Sr-90 Activity In Release Path CI) 3.4E-O4 3.9E-04 Total Ni-63 Activity In Release Path CI) 6.7E-04 6.7E-04 Percent of annual dose limit Whole Body Dose (mrem/yr) 2.1 E-03 2.5E-03 0.08%

Adult Bone Dose (mrem/yr) 9.7E-03 1.1E-02 0.11%

Note: where 620 pCVI was used, it was based on an average of the readings from MW-38. U3-1, U3-2. U3-3. U3-4. U3-T1. and U3-T2 Where 1560 pCII was used. it was based on an average of the results from storm sewer systems A, B, and C.

Where 651 pCI/ was used, itwas based on an average of the results from MH-2 Where 2900 pCi/I was used, Itwas based on an average of the results from MH-4 and MH-4a.

IPEC Summary for Storm & Ground Water releases (H-3, Ni-63, Sr-90)

Adult mrem (most limiting)

Sum of IPEC monitoring well calculations for units 1, 2, & 3 (Areas 2, 3a, & 3b)

Storm Drain Water from Zone B, East/West Unit 2, near MH-2, going to river directly se a41 Storm Drain Water from Zones C and DIE (Central U2 & UllU3) to Discharge Canal Doses, in mrem ITOE" OE VLVR TMOT..BODY.

00I TH..Y.R0~ I '.... KIDN.,W KQN fl'

LUNG".-.-' I Gt-LU I'.

Totals: Doses, inmrem H-3 only jO.OOE+OO 9.19E-06 9.19E-06 9.19E-06 I- 9.19E-06 -19.19E0M16 9.190 I H-3, Ni-63, Sr-90 see above 1.11E-02 1.01E-04 2.45E-03 I 9.19E-06 j 9.1.9E-06 9.19E-06 j1 3.10E-04 j K . '.;;;;

. %::A..

... * ,. ..- . ,,. .. . Q..

. , : ... . . ..: ..,.., . . . ... ..*... ..2.. ...... .* . ..\.O..

. .. . ...G..... ..... ... .... . ........ .. . ..*.. . .. . .. ..... ............. . .. . . . . .. .

Storm Drain Zone B (MH-2 East & West Unit 2) to the Hudson River directly Release RateI 6.15E+07 ml/day or 1.62E+04 gpd or 11.28 gpm Duration of Release, in days 1 365 1 Waste vol released = 5.93E+06 gal Dilution flow 1 1.11 E+05 gpm Dilution vol released = 5.83E+10 gal Dil Factor 1.02E-04 (dilution data per IP-CHM-05-042 from Dr. John Hamawi) 1Q FR O ~ P .....

.. I RO '

~~1S0T~~~~~~

. .RIs~<

.'.rifl)

.~~.J

.~ .T~

H-3 6.51 E-07 1.OOE-02 6.51E-05 6.62E-11 6.62E-09 1.46E+04 MN-54 3.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 FE-55 1.OOE-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 CO-58 2.O0E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OE+00 CO-60 3.OOE-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 NI-63 I.OOE-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 SR-90 5.OOE-06 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 SB-125 3.OOE-04 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 CS-1 34 9.OOE-06 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 CS-1 37 1.OOE-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-57 6.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 NUREG 0133 "Applicable Factor" for Near Field Dilution = I 1.0OE+00-Adult Total Body mrem H-3 0.OOE+ 1.63E-07 1.63E-07 1.63E-07 1.63E-07 1.63E-07 1.63E-07 MN-54 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 FE-55 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-58 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-60 0.OOE+00 O.OE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 NI-63 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 SR-90 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 SB-125 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CS-1 34 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 CS-1 37 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 0,OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-57 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 ,0.OE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00

~~~~ ~

7,-.0Q .Q -~~6~7 . 6EO ~~

Calc Sheet A2-2

Central Unit 2 Storm Drain Releases to the Hudson River via the Discharge Canal (Zone C)

Release Rate 3.23E+07 Iml/day or 8.54E+03 gpd or 5.93 gpm Duration of Release, in days 1 365 Waste vol released = 3.12E+06 gal Dilution flow I 1.39E+06 gpm Dilution vol released = 7.31 E+ 1 gal Dil Factor 4.27E-06 (dilution from actual2005 data)

CO-58 2.00E-04 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CO-60 3.OOE-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 NI-63 1.00E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 SR-90 5.00E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 SB-1 25 3.00E-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CS-1 34 9.00E-06 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 CS-1 37 I1.00E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CO-57 6.00E-04 o.OOE+0O 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

  • No gamma identified in storm drains, and 2.9E-6 was avg effluent H-3 in 2005 from MH-4a.

NUREG 0133 "Applicable Factor" for Near Field Dilution = 5OOE+007-Adult Total Body mrem H-3 0.00E+00 6.11E-09 6.11E-09 6.11E-09 6.11E-09 6.11E-09 6.11E-09 MN-54 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 FE-55 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CO-58 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 CO-60 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 NI-63 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 SR-90 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 SB-125 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CS-1 34 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CS-1 37 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CO-57 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 V,~O+&~81I.~

71TL OAEO '1-9 ~4~Q Caic Sheet A2-3

Storm Drain Releases to the Hudson River via the Discharge Canalfrom Units 1 and 3 (Zones D and E)

Release RateI 2.17E+08 ml/day or 5.72E+04 gpd or 39.75 gpm Duration of Release, in days 1 365 Waste vol released = 2.09E+07 gal Dilution flow I 1.39E+06 gpm Dilution vol released = 7.31 E+11 gal Dil Factor 2.86E-05 (dilution from actual2005 data)

C0-57 116.OOE-04 O.OOE+0Q I .OOE+00 IO.OOE+00 I O.OOE+00 T~TAL9M -"'~ ".6O A~1~'-46~

Me6.~ ~~,345

  • No gamma identified in storm drains, and 1.56E-6 was average of effected Storm Drains in 2005 NUREG 0133 "Applicable Factor" for Near Field Dilution = I 5.OOE+O0I Adult Total Body mrem

_._._ .... 'T1*.Y ... H...VO*.'*-l*'; .... .......... ............

H-3 O.OOE+00 2.20E-08 2.20E-08 2.20E-08 2.20E-08 2.20E-08 2.20E-08 MN-54 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+0O FE-55 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 CO-58 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 CO-60 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+O0 NI-63 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 SR-90 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 SB-125 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 O.OOE+00 CS-134 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 CS-137 O.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-57 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00. 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 T................. *0,Qi O

.*& Z2QE-0 * - 22O O -  :  : 2E!S*.*-0 ~ :

Calc Sheet Al &3-2

IP3 Releases to Hudson River via Bedrock Pathway (from the area near IP3 waterfront, as determined by samples from Monitoring Wells - Area 3b)

Release RateI 4.26E+07 Iml/day or 1.13E+04 gpd or 7.82 gpm Duration of Release, in days 1 365 Waste vol released = 4.11 E+06 gal Dilution flow I 1.11E+05 gpm Dilution vol released = 5.83E+10 gal Dil Factor 7.04E-05 (dilution data per IP-CHM-05-042 from Dr. John Hamawi) 4 CO-57 6.OOE-04 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 T~TAL '~2Q~Q7"' Wa .~ ~20E-Q5 ~4.37~41 4~7E-O~' ~4~+O$~

NUREG 0133 "Applicable Factor"' for Near Field Dilution = I .OOE+00 I Adult Total Body mrem_

H-3 O.OOE+00 1.08E-07 1.08E-07 1.08E-07 1.08E-07 1.08E-07 1.08E-07 MN-54 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 FE-55 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-58 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-60 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 NI-63 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 SR-90 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 SB-125 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CS-1 34 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CS-137 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-57 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 T~A~ ____________ ~~~i7 tOQ7 '~~8~O .QE-7.~477~7 Calc Sheet A3-1

IPN Releases to Hudson River via Bedrock Pathway (from the area near IPI waterfront, as determined by samples from Monitoring Wells - Area 3a)

Release RateI 3.26E+07 ml/day or 8.61 E+03 gpd or 5.98 gpm Duration of Release, in days 1 365 1 Waste vol releas ed= 3.14E+06 gal Dilution flow I 1.11E+05-I gpm Dilution vol released = 5.83E+10 gal Dil Factor 5.39E-05 (dilution data per IP-CHM-05-042 from Dr. John Hamawi)

CS-1 34 9.00E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 CS-137 1.00E-05 O.OO00 0 O.00E+00 0.00E+00 I O.OE+00 CO-57 ....... 6.0E-04 O.OOE+00 I O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 NUREG 0133 "Applicable Factor" for Near Field Dilution = I 1.OOE+O0 I Adult Total Body mrem _

H-3 O.OOE+0O 4.54E-06 4.54E-06 4.54E-06 4.54E-06 4.54E-06 4.54E-06 MN-54 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 FE-55 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OQE+00 O.OQE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-58 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+OO O.OOE+00 O.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OE+00 CO-60 0.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 NI-63 1.33E-03 9.20E-05 4.45E-05 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.92E-05 SR-90 8.95E-03 O.OOE+00 2.19E-03 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.58E-04 SB-125 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.00E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.O0E+00 0.00E+00 CS-1 34 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 CS-137 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 CO-57 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.0OE+00 O.OOE+00

  • T MT77'3I D"E.. ' F-703' 44 __ _ __ __ __

Calc Sheet Al-1

IP2 Activity Releases to Hudson River via Bedrock Pathway (from the area near IP2 transformer yard, as determined by samples from Monitoring Wells - Area 2)

Release RateI 1.84E+07 ml/day or 4.85E+03 gpd or 3.37 gpm Duration of Release, in days 1 365 1 Waste vol released = 1.77E+06 gal Dilution flow I 1.11E+05 gpm Dilution vol released = 5.83E+10 gal Dil Factor 3.03E-05 (dilution dataper IP-CHM-05-042 from Dr. John Hamawi)

SB-125 3.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 CS-134 9.OOE-06 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 CS-1 37 1 _ _ 1.00E-05 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 CO-57 6.OOE-04 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 TO7AI77 5.1 E. j a , -0 .S4  ;'7EJ'$89+  ;

NUREG 0133 "Applicable Factor" for Near Field Dilution = I I.OOE+O001 Adult Total Body mrem_

H-3 O.OOE+00 4.35E-06 4.35E-06 4.35E-06 4.35E-06 4.35E-06 4.35E-06 MN-54 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 FE-55 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 O.OOE+00 CO-58 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.0OE+00 0.OOE+00 CO-60 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00

  • NI-63 0.OOE+00 O.OE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 SR-90 8.40E-04 0.OOE+00 2.06E-04 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 2.42E-05 SB-125 O.OE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 CS-1 34 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 CS-137 O.0OE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 CO-57 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+0o O.OOE+O0 Calc Sheet A2-1

"-N i -~

Precipitation (inches) at IPEC 14-12-10.

8.

8 4

2 0

0 C0 0 0 0ý 0 - - - - N N N N

. N N MC VC) MC MC MC MC -4 If f)I) 0t to m m 000 m m 0 M

"ý 2 2 ZE coz z -,M 0 0 m a) 0 m0 Cu~. m 0

ý )Z -- 2 2 )Z -,J.E2 Z-72 2 COZ

Adult Dose Factors Only ISOTOPE BONE LIVER TOT BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H-3 0.OOE+00 2.82E-01 2.82E-01 2.82E-01 2.82E-01 2.82E-01 2.82E-01 MN-54 0.O0E+00 5.43E+03 1.04E+03 0.OOE+00 1.61 E+03 0.0OE+00 1.66E+04 FE-55 3.21E+04 2.21E+04 5.16E+03 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.24E+04 1.27E+04 CO-58 O.OOE+00 5.15E+02 1.15E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.04E+04 CO-60 O.OOE+00 1.48E+03 3.26E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.78E+04 NI-63 4.97E+04 3.45E+03 1.67E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 7.19E+02 SR-90 6.32E+05 0.OOE+00 1.55E+05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.82E+04 SB-125 3.11E+02 3.47E+00 7.40E+01 3.16E-01 0.OOE+00 2.40E+02 3.42E+03 CS-134 4.14E+04 9.84E+04 8.04E+04 0.OOE+00 3.18E+04 1.06E+04 1.72E+03 CS-1 37 5.30E+04 7.25E+04 4.75E+04 0.OOE+00 2.46E+04 8.18E+03 1.40E+03 CO-57 0.00E+00 1.21 E+02 2.01 E+02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.O0E+00 3.07E+03 Teen Dose Factors ISOTOPE BONE LIVER TOT BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H-3 0.OOE+00 2.17E-01 2.17E-01 2.17E-01 2.17E-01 2.17E-01 2.17E-01 MN-54 0.00E+00 5.33E+03 1.06E+03 0.OOE+00 1.59E+03 0.OOE+00 1.09E+04 FE-55 3.35E+04 2.37E+04 5.43E+03 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.51 E+04 1.03E+04 CO-58 0.OOE+00 5.1OE+02 1.18E+03 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 7.04E+03 CO-60 0.OOE+00 1.48E+03 3.32E+03 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.92E+04 NI-63 5.15E+04 3.64E+03 1.75E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 5.79E+02 SR-90 5.27E+05 0.OOE+00 1.30E+05 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.48E+04 SB-125 3.27E+02 3.58E+00 7-64E+01 3.11E-01 0.O0E+00 2.85E+02 2.53E+03 CS-1 34 4.24E+04 9.97E+04 4.63E+04 0.OOE+00 3.17E+04 1.21 E+04 1.24E+03 CS-1 37 5.67E+04 7.54E+04 2.63E+04 0.OOE+00 2.57E+04 9.97E+03 1.07E+04 CO-57 .Q00E+00 1.25E+02 2.1 OE+02 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 2.33E+03 Child Dose Factors ISOTOPE BONE LIVER TOT BODY THYROID KIDNEY LUNG GI-LLI H-3 O.OOE+00 1.81E-01 1.81E-01 1.81E-01 1.81E-01 1.81E-01 1.81E-01 MN-54 0.00E+00 4.20E+03 1.12E+03 0.OOE+00 1.18E+03 0.OOE+00 3.53E+03 FE-55 4.55E+04 2.42E+04 7.48E+03 O.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 1.37E+04 4.47E+03 CO-58 0.OOE+00 4.20E+02 1.29E+03 0.00E+00 O.OQE+0Q 0.OOE+00 2.45E+03 CO-60 0.OOE+00 1.23E+03 3.64E+03 0.O0E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 6.84E+03 NI-63 6.85E+04 3.67E+03 2.33E+03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.47E+02 SR-90 4.68E+05 0.OOE+00 1.19E+05 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 6.30E+03 SB-125 4.22E+02 3.25E+00 8.85E+01 3.91E-01 0.OOE+00 2.35E+02 1.01E+03 CS--134 5.15E+04 8.44E+04 1.78E+04 0.OOE+00 2.62E+04 9.39E+03 4.55E+02 CS-137 7.19E+04 6.88E+04 1.02E+04 O.OOE+00 2.24E+04 8.07E+03 4.31 E+02 CO-57 0.00E+00 1.15E+02 2.33E+02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 9.43E+02

Update IPEC ground water dose calc Page 1 of I We updated the concentrations with some new data, as described. Same model, for now.

<<Updated Dose Calc.pdf>>

Steve Sandike Effluents / RMS ENN Indian Point Energy Center Buchanan, NY 10511-0308 phone: 914-736-8455 fax: 914-734-6010 email: ssandik@entergy.com file://C:\temp\TEXT.htm0 05/10/2006