Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005, for the Oyster Creek Generating Station
	ML061220343
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek; (DPR-016)
Issue date:	05/01/2006
From:	Rausch T; AmerGen Energy Co, Exelon Corp
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	2120-062-2961, 2130-06-20329
	Download: ML061220343 (101)
	v • d • e

An Exelon Company AmerCen Energy Company www.exe1 oncorp.com Oystes Creek US Route g South, P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731-0388 Technical Specitkation 6.9.1.e May 1,2006 2 130-06-20329 2 120-062-296 1 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Oyster Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219

Subject:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - 2005 Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for calendar year 2005, for the Oyster Creek Generating Station. This submittal is made in accordance with Oyster Creek Generating Station Technical Specification 6.9.1.e.

If any further information or assistance is needed, please contact Kathy Barnes at 609-97 1-4970.

-ice President, Oyster Creek Generating Station DRW/DRW/KB Enclosure cc:

Administrator, USNRC Region I USNRC Senior Project Manager, Oyster Creek USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Oyster Creek File No. 06004

Docket No:

50-2 I 9

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION I

I UNIT I I

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2005 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 May 2006

Table Of Contents I

I. Summary and Conclusions................................................ !...............................................

1 II. Introduction.................................................................................

2 I

A. Objectives of the REMP........................................

2 B. Implementation of the Objectives..........................................................................

3 I

I

/ '

111. Program Description..........................................................................................................

3 A. Sample Collection.................................................................................................. 3 B. Sample Analysis.....................................................................................................

5 Data Interpretation.................................................................................................

5 Program Exceptions............................................................................................... 7 E. Program Changes.................................................................................................

9 C.

D.

IV Results and Discussion 9

A. Aquatic Environment.............................................................................................

9 1. Surface Water............................................................................................. 9 2. Well Water.....................................................

10 3. Fish...........................................................................................................

10 4. Clams and Crabs...........................................

10 5. Sediment...................................................................................................

1 1 B. Atmospheric Environment...................................................................................

12 I

. Airborne.................................................................................................... 12 a. Air Particulates..............................................................................

12 b. Airborne Iodine..............................................................................

13 2. Terrestrial.................................................................................................. 13 a. Vegetation.....................................................................................

13 C. Ambient Gamma Radiation................................................................................. 13 D. Land Use Survey.................................................................................................

14 E. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program............................

15 V. References......................................................................................................................

16

Append ices I

Appendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary Tables Table A-I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for the Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 (I

Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, And Sample Collection &

Analytical Methods I

Table B-I:

Table B-2:

Table B-3:

Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 4

Flaures Figure B-I :

Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS)

Locations of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)

Stations within two miles of the OCGS Figure B-2:

Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS)

Locations of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)

Stations greater than two miles from the OCGS Appendix C Data Tables - Primary Laboratory Tables Table C-1.1 Table C-1.2 Table C-11.1 Table C-11.2 Table C-111.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Tritium in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Predator and Bottom Feeder (Fish) Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Table C-111.2 Table C-IV.1 Table C-V.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam and Crab Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating S'tation, 2005.

Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in 1

4 the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station: 2005.

Table C-V.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations (E-3 PCVCU METER) in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Strontium in Air Particulate karnples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Table C-V.3 Table C-V.4 Table C-VI.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

I Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity Table C-VII. 1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

I I

Table C-VIII.1 Quarterly TLD Results for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Table C-V111.2 Mean Quarterly TLD Results for the Site Boundary, Middle, Special Interest, and Control Locations for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Table C-V111.3 Table C-IX.l Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Summary of Collection Dates for Samples Cotlected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Fraures Figure C-I Figure C-2 Figure C-3 Figure C-4 Figure C-5 Figure C-6 Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Clams Oyster Creek Generating Station, 7983 - 2005.

Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2005.

Mean Cesium-I 37 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2005.

Mean Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2005.

Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Dose Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

iii

I I

I Figure C-7 Appendix D Tables Table D-I. 1 Table D-1.2 Table D-11.1 Table D-11.2 Table D-111.1 Table D-IV.l Table D-V. 1 Appendix E Tables Table E-I Table E-2 Table E-3 Table E-4 Table E-5 I

Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Dose I

Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1989 - 2005.

Data Tables - QC Laboratory Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity Of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

I8 I

I Concentrations of Tritium in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005.

I lnter-Laboratory Comparison Program Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program feledyne Brown Engineering, 2005 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2005 DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2005 ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, t nc., 2005 DOEs Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Environmental, Inc., 2005 iv

I.

Summary and Conclusions I

This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted for the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by AmerGen Energy Company covers the period 01 January 2005 through 31 December 2005. During that time period, 1181 analyses were performed on I009 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with historical data, it on the environment.

was concluded that the operation of OCGS had no radiological impact Surface and well water sampl,es were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected.

Tritium activity was detected at a very low level in one well water controLstation.

This control station is located upgradient of Oyster Creek and outside the influence of the facility. Data from previous years indicates that the yearly average tritium concentration is not significantly different from previous years.

Fish (predator and bottom feeder), clams, crabs, and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected in fish, clams, or crabs. Cesium-I37 levels detected in sediment were consistent with levels detected in previous years and were due to previous plant releases and fallout from nuclear weapons testing. No other OCGS-produced fission or activation products were detected in sediment.

Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and gamma emitting nuclides. Cosmogenic Be-7 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected.

High sensitivity 1-13? analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable activity.

Strontium-89 and strontium-90 and gamma analyses were performed on quarterly composites of air particulate samples. All strontium-89 and strontium-90 results were below the minimum detectable activity.

Vegetation samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, strontium-89, and strontium-90. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. Cesium437 was detected at low levels consistent with those detected in previous years. All strontium-89 results were below the minimum detectable activity. Strontium-90 activity was detected at low levels in both control and indicator stations.

Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Levels detected were consistent with those observed in previous years.

1

I II.

Introduction The Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling water reactor owned and operated by AmerGen Energy Company, is located on the Atlantic Coastal Plain Physiographic Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles south of Newark, 9 miles south of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It lies approximately 2 miles inland from Barnegat Bay. The site, covering approximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesser extent, in 'Ocean Township. Access is provided by U.S. Route 9, passing through the site and separating a 637-acre eastern portion from the balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about % mile west of the highway and 1% miles east of the Garden State Parkway. The site property extends about 2% miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost I mile. The site location is part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands. The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site and Oyster Creek partly borders the southern side.

A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for OCGS was initiated in 1966. This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), Global Dosimetry, and Environmental Inc. (Midwest labs) on samples collected during the period 01 January 2005 through 31 December 2005.

A.

Objectives of the REMP The, objectives of the REMP are to:

1.

Assess dose impacts to the public from the OCGS operations

2.

To verify in-plant controls for the containment of radioactive materials.

3.

To monitor any buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the environment and changes in background radiation levels.

4.

To provide reassurance to the public that the program is capable of adequately assessing impacts and identifying noteworthy changes in the radiological status of the environment.

5.

Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the site environs.

2

6.

Evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material released from the plant and resultant r'adiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.

(

I

7.

To fulfill the requirements of the OCGS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and Technical Specifications.

B.

Implementation of the Objectives I

(

I The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:

I

1.

Identifying significant exposure pathways.

2.

Establishing baseline radiological data of media within those pathways.

3.

Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.

I I I.

Program Description I

A.

Sample Collection Samples for the OCGS REMP were collected for AmerGen Energy Company by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, RMC Environmental Services Division (RMC). This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the OCGS REMP in 2005. Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Tables B-I and B-2, and Figures B-I and B-2, Appendix B. The collection procedures are listed in Table B-3.

tic Fnvironmed The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, well water, fish, clams, crabs, and sediment. One gallon surface water samples were collected monthly from two locations (33 and 94), semiannually at two locations (23 and 24), and quarterly from three well water locations (I, 37, and 38). Control locations were 94 and 37. All samples were collected in plastic bottles, which were rinsed at least twice with suurce water prior to collection. Fish samples comprising the flesh of two groups, bottom feeder and predator, were collected semiannually at three locations (33, 93 and 94 (control)). Clams were collected semiannually from three locations (23, 24, and 94 3

I (control)). One annual crab sample was collected from one location (93).

Sediment samples were collected at four locations semiannually (23, 24, 33, and 94 (control)).

tmospheric Fnvironment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of air particulate, airborne iodine, and vegetation.

Airborne ibdine and particulate samples were, collected and analyzed weekly at seven locations (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, and 73). The control location was C. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The filters were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

No commercial dairy operations and no dairy animals producing milk for human consumption are located within a 5 mile radius of the plant.

Therefore, vegetation samples were collected in lieu of milk. Vegetation samples were collected, when available, at three locations (35, 36, and 66). Station 36 was the control. All samples were collected in 18 x 24 new unused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

rnbient G m m a Fkdiation Direct radiation measurements were made using Panasonic Model 81 4 calcium sulfate (CaS04) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). The TLDs were placed on and around the OCGS site and were categorized as follows:

A site lxuxhy r ing consisting of 16 locations (1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59,61,62,63, 64,65 and 66) near the boundary.

An -rice r ing consisting of 16 locations (4, 5, 22, 47, 48, 68, 73, 74, 75, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, and 99) extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to close-in population.

Pecial interest s-consisting of 15 locations (3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 46, 71, 72, 78, 81, 88, 89, 90, 92, and TI) representing special interest areas such as poputation centers, state parks, etc.

round (Control) stations consisting of two locations (C and 14) greater than 20 miles distant from the site.

4

Indicator TLDs were placed systematically, with at least one station in each of 16 meteorological compass sectors in the general area of the site boundary.

TLDs were also placed in each land-based meteorological sector in the 6 to 8 kilometer (9.7 to 12.9 mile) range, where reasonable highway access would permit, in areas of public interest and population centers. Background locations were located greater than 32 kilometers (20 miles) distant from the OCGS and generally in an upwind direction from the OCGS.

Two TLDs - each comprised of three CaS04 thermoluminescent phosphors enclosed in plastic - were placed at each location approximately three to eight feet above ground level. The TLDS were exchanged quarterly and sent to Global Dosimetry for analysis.

B.

Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the OCGS REMP in 2005. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-3.

In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:

1.

Concentrations of beta emitters in air particulates.

2.

Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface and well water, fish, clams, crabs, sediment, air particulates, and vegetation.

3.

Concentrations of tritium in surface and well water.

4.

Concentrations of 1-131 in air iodine cartridges.

5.

Concentrations of strontium in air particulates and vegetation.

6.

Ambient gamma radiation levels at various locations around the OCGS.

C.

Data Interpretation For trending purposes, the radiological and direct radiation data collected during 2005 were compared with data from past years. OCGS preoperational data was compared to the 2005 data presented in this report. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:

5

1 J ower 1 rmhf Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration

1.

The lower limit of detection (LLD) was defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD was intended as a before the fact estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criterion for the presence of activity. All analyses were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.

The minimum detectable activity (MDA) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity.

I

2.

tv Calcuinn and m a

Y nf Res&

Net activity for a sample was calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity, which results in a negative number.

An MDA was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.

Results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:

For surface and well water I 3 nuclides, H-3, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59 Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-1 31, Cs-I 34, Cs-I 37, Ba-140, and La-I 40 were reported.

For fish eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-134, and Cs-I37 were reported.

For clams eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, CO-60, Zn-65, Cs-134, and Cs-I37 were reported.

For crabs eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, 21-1-65, Cs-134, and Cs-I 37 were reported.

For sediment seven nuclides, Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Cs-134, and Cs-I37 were reported.

6

For air particulate eight nuclides, Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-60, Sr-89, 3-90, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Gross Beta were reported.

For air cartridges one nuclide, 1-131 was reported.

For vegetation nine nuclides, Be-7, K-40, Sr-89, Sr-90, 1-1 31, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-I40 were reported.

f Means and standard deviations of the resutts were calculated. The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.

D.

Program Exceptions For 2005 the OCGS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%.

Exceptions are listed below:

I. Ground water monthly grab samples were not available for the following period and location, due to well drilling:

September 2005, Location 38

2.

Ground water quarterly composites missed the Ba-I40 LLD for the following periods and locations, due to the composite date rather than the stop collection date being used as the reference date:

01/01/2005 - 03/31/05, Location 1 01/01/2005 - 03/31/05, Location 37 01/01/2005 - 03/31/05, Location 38 04/01/2005 - 06/30/05, Location 1 04/01/2005 - 06/30/05, Location 37 04/01/2005 - 06/30/05, Location 38 07/01/2005 - 09/31/05, Location I 07/01 12005 - 09/31 105, Location 37 07/0 I

/ZOO5 - 09/3 1/05, Location 38

3.

Air particulate and air iodine samples were not av ilabte for the following periods and locations, due to electrical problems:

01/18/2005 - 01/25/2005 (week 4), Location 71 01/18/2005 - 01/25/2005 (week 4), Location 73 01/25/2005 - 02/01/2005 (week 5), Location 73 02/01/2005 - 02/08/2005 (week 6), Location 73 02/08/2005 - 02/15/2005 (week 7), Location 73 02/15/2005 - 02/22/2005 (week 8), Location 73 02/22/2005 - 03/02/2005 (week 9), Location 72 03/02/2005 - 03/08/2005 (week lo), Location 73 05/03/2005 - 05/10/2005 (week I 9), Location 20 7

I 05/10/2005 - 05/18/2005 (week 20), Location 20 05/24/2005 - 06/01/2005 (week 22), Location C 06/01/2005 - 06/07/2005 (week 23), Location 66 06/01/2005 - 06/07/2005 (week 23), Location C 07/07/2005 - 07/13/2005 (week 28), Location 66 0811 0/2005 - 08/16/2005 (week 33), Location 72 07/26/2005 - 08/03/2005 (week 31), Location 3 08/10/2005 - 08/16/2005 (week 33), Location 72 08/16/2005 - 08/23/2005 (week 34), Location 72 08/23/2005 - 08/30/2005 (week 35), Location 72 08/30/2005 - 09/07/2005 (week 36), Location 72 09/07/2005 - 09/13/2005 (week 37), Location C 09/14/2005 - 09/21/2005 (week 38), Location C 09/21/2005 - 09/27/2005 (week 39), Location C 09/27/2005 - 10/05/2005 (week 40), Location C 10/05/2005 - 10/12/2O05 (week 41), Location 71 10/05/2005 - 10/12/2005 (week 41), Location 73 10/05/2005 - 10/12/2005 (week 41), Location C 10/12/2005 - 10/19/2005 (week 42), Location 71 10/12/2005 - 10/19/2005 (week 42), Location 72 10/12/2005 - 10/19/2005 (week 42), Location 3 10/12/2005 - 10/19/2005 (week 42), Location C I

12/20/2005 - 12/28/2005 (week 52), Location 71

4.

Air particulate and air iodine samples were found to have a small hole in the center of each filter for the following period and location, reason unknown:

0/7/07/2005 - 07/13/2005 (week 28), Location 66

5.

Air particulate filter adhered to the filter holder for the following period and location, due to high humidity:

07/26/2005 - 08/03/2005 (week 31), Location 3

7.

Air particulate gross beta and air iodine samples iodine-I31 LLDs were missed for the following period and location, due to small air volume from electrical failure:

09/07/2005 - 09/13/2005 (week 37), Location C 6,

TLD sample was lost for the following periods and locations, due to vandalism:

01 / I 0/2O05 - 04/1 I

/2005, Location 65 0 I

/ I 0/2005 - 04/1 I

/2005, Location 78 04/11/2005 - 07/11/2005, Location 5 I

0/10/2005 - 01/09/2006, Location 6 I

0/10/2005 - 01/09/2006, Location 74 8

7.

TLD sample was not collected for the following periods and locations, due to presence of heavy eduipment during ongoing construction:

0711 1/2005 - 1011 0/2005, Location 9 10/10/2005 - 01/09/2006, Location 9,

I

8.

Clams were unavailable for collection in the Facility Discharge Canal for 2005.

Each program exception was captured under the corrective action process which resulted in an investigation to understand the causes of the program exception. Sampling and maintenance errors were reviewed with the personnel involved to prevent recurrence.

r The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementation.

E.

Program Changes I

There were no changes to the program in 2005.

I IV.

Results and Discussion A.

Aquatic Environment I. Surface Water Samples were taken via grab sample methodology at two locations (33 and 94) on a monthly schedule. In addition, grab samples were collected semi-annually at two locations (23 and 24). Of these locations 23, 24, and 33, located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creeks effluent releases. The following analyses were performed :

Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected. The highest MDA was calculated at ~ 2 0 0 pCi/l.

Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting 9

nuclides (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the M DA.

2.

Well Water Quarterly samples were composited from monthly grab samples at three locations (1, 37, and 38). Two locations (I and 38) could be affected by Oyster Creeks effluent releases. The following anhlyses were performed:

Quarterly samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). Tritium activities were consistent with those detected in previous years.

Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDA.

1

3.

Fish Fish samptes comprised of American eel and flounder (bottom feeder) and weakfish, striped bass, bluefish, black drum, kingfish, herring, and crevalle jack (predator) were collected at three locations (33, 93, and 94) semiannually. Locations 93 and 33 could be affected by Oyster Creeks effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

I The edible portions of fish samples from three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-WI, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 2,250 to 5,190 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.

4.

Clams and Crabs Clams were collected at three locations (23, 24, and 94) semiannually. Crabs were collected at one location (93) annually.

Locations 23, 24, and 93 could be affected by Oyster Creeks 10

effluent releases. The following analysis was' performed:

I The edible portions of clam samples from all three locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 942 to 1,740 pCilkg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. Historical levels of Co-60 in clams are shown in Figure C-I, AppendixC.

I The edible portions of crab samples from one location were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at a concentration of 3,260 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.

5.

Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at four locations (23, 24, 33, and 94) semiannually. Of these locations, stations 23, 24, and 33 located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Sediment samples from all four locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C). Nuclides detected were naturally occurring Be-7 and K-40, and the fission, product CS-I

37.

Beryllium-7 was found in one sediment sample. Location 23 had a concentration of 1030 pCi/kg dry. Potassium-40 was found at all stations and ranged from 709 to 20,200 pCi/kg dry. Concentrations of the fission product Cs-I37 was found in one sediment sample.

Location 23 had a concentration of 87 pCi/kg dry. The activity detected was consistent with those detected in previous years (Figure C-3, Appendix C). No other Oyster Creek fission or activation products were found. figure C-2, Appendix C graphs Co-60 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2005.

I I

B.

Atmospheric Environment

1.

Airborne

a.

Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples were collected from seven locations on a weekly basis. The seven locations were separated into three groups: Group I represents locations near the OCGS site boundary (20 and 66), Group II represents the locations at an intermediate distance from the OCGS site (71, 72, and 73), and Group Ill represents the control and locations at a remote distance from OCGS (C and 3). The following analyses were performed:

GmsE5eh Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-V.1 and C-V.2, Appendix C).

Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.

Comparison of results among the three groups aid in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of OCGS. The results from the Site Boundary locations (Group I) ran ed from <6 to 31 E-3 pCi/m3 with a mean of 15 E-3 pCi/m. The results from the Intermediate Distance locations (Group 11) ran ed from <5 to 40 E-3 pCi/m3 with a mean of 14 E-3 pCi/m. The results from the Distant locations (Group Ill) ranged from 6 to 50 E-3 pCi/m3 with a mean of 14 E-3 pCi/m3. Comparison of the 2005 air particulate data with previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of OCGS (Figure C-5, Appendix C). In addition a comparison of the weekly mean values for 2005 indicate no notable differences among the three groups (Figure C-4, Appendix C).

B

!I nbm-89 and Strontrum-9Q Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Tabte C-V.3, Appendix C).

No strontium was detected.

Weekly samples were corn posited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.4, Appendix C).

12

I I

Naturally occurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in all samples. The& values ranged from 41 to 106 E-3 pCi/m3. All other nuclides were less than the MDA.

b.

Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples were collected from seven (C, 3, 20, 66, 71, 72, and 73) locations and analyzed weekly for 1-1 31 (Table C-VI.1, Appendix C). All results were less

, than the MDA.

2.

Terrest ria I

a.

Vegetation Samples were collected from three locations (35, 36, and 66) when available. The fol towing analyses were performed:

ntium-89 and Strontium-9Q Vegetation samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). All strontium-89 results were less than the MDA. Strontium-90 was detected in all samples. The values ranged from 4 to 39 pCi/kg wet, which is consistent with historical data.

C.

Each vegetation sample from locations 35, 36, and 66 Sector were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C). Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 2,300 to 6,520 pCi/l. Cs-I37 activity detected in three samples was consistent with those detected in previous years. All other nuclides were less than the MDA.

Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing Panasonic Model 81 4 (CaS04) thermoluminescent dosimeters. Forty-nine TLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-VIII.1 to C-Vlll.3, Appendix C.

All TLD measurements were below 20 mR/standard quarter, with a range 13

I of 7.6 to 19.2 mR/standard quarter. 2005 gamma radiation data from the control location were plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance, and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-6, Appendix C). Historical ambient gamma radiation data from the control location was plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-7, Appendix C). The 2005 TLD results are consistent with historical data.

D.

Land UseSuryey I

A Land Use Survey, conducted during 2005 around the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), was performed by Normandeau Associates, RMC Environmental Services Division for Exelon Nuclear. The purpose of the survey was, in part, to determine the location of animals producing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS. None were observed.

Another purpose of the survey was to determine the location of gardens greater than 500 square feet in size producing broad leaf vegetation, as well as the closest residence within each of the sixteen meteorological sectors. The distance and direction of all locations from the OCGS Reactor Building were positioned using Global Positioning System (GPS) technology. There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result of this survey. The results of this survey are summarized below.

Distance in Miles from the OCGS Reactor Buildinq Sector Residence Garden*

(Miles)

I N I.I I

.3 2 NNE 0.6 1.8 3 NE 0.7 1.5 4 ENE 1.I 3.1 5 E 1.2 6 ESE 0.7 0.4 7 SE 0.6 0.4 8 SSE 0.9 I

.8 9s I

.6 2.1 I0 ssw 1.7 4.3 I1 sw 1.7 1.8 12 wsw 2.3 13 W 14 WNW I

15 NW 5.3 16 NNW I.5 2.8

Greater than 500 ft2 in size producing broad leaf vegetation 14

I E.

Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program I

The primary and secondary laboratories analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices (Appendix E). The PE samples, suppliedby Analytics Inc.,

Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOES Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria:

I.

Analytics Evaluation Criteria 1

I Analytics evatuation report provides a ratio of TBEs result and Anatytics known value. Since flag values are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ES evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

2.

ERA Evaluation Criteria ERAs evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERAs acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, NELAC, state specific PT program requirements or ERAs SOP fat the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate reg u latory document.

3.

DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEPs evaluation report provides an acceptance ran,ge with associated flag values.

The MAP EP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag =

A), Acceptable with Warning (flag = W), and Not Acceptable (flag = N). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is k 20% of the reference value.

Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from 220% to &30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% <

bias c 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

For the primary laboratory, I 8 out of 19 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. One sample did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reason:

15

I

1.

Teledyne Brown Engineerings Analytics September 2005 air particulate Fe-59 ratio of 1.35 exceeded the upper control limit of I.30 due to a new technician not counting the air particulate in a petri dish.

For the secondary laboratory, I 9 out of 23 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. Four samples did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1.

b I

Environmental I n c h ERAs November 2005 water Gross Alpha result of 41.I pCi/L exceeded the upper control limit of 33.4 pCi/L.

This was due to using an Am-241 efficiency instead of a Th-232 efficiency when counting the sample. Using the correct efficiency gave a result of 27.0 pCi/L.

2.

Environmental Inc.s ERAs November 2005 water Ra-228 result of 5.5 pCi/L exceeded the upper control limit of 5.0 pCi/L due to presence of radium daughters. Delay in counting I00 minutes gave a result of 4.01 pci/L.

3.

Environmental I n c h MAPEPs January 2005 air particulate Sr-90 result of 2.2 exceeded the upper control limit of I

.76 Bq/kg.

Reanalysis result was 1.56 Bq/kg.

4.

Environmental Inc.s MAPEPs July 2005 soil Am-241 result of 48.4 exceeded the lower control limit of 56.77 Bq/kg due to incorrect sample weight being used in the calculation. When recalculated with the correct sample weight, the result was 97.0 Bq/kg.

The Inter-laboratory Comparison Program provides evidence of in control counting systems and methods, and that the laboratories are producing accurate and reliable data.

V.,

References I. AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Operating License and Technical Specifications, Appendix A, DPR-16, April 1969.

2.

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Procedure CY-OC-170-301.

3.

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Updated Final Safety Analysis Report.

16

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measdrements, Report No. 93, Ionizing Radiation Exposure bf the Population of the United States, 1987.

CRC Handbook, Radioecology: Nuclear Ene,rgy add the Environment, F. Ward Whicker and Vincent Schultz, Volume I, 1982.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 4

Report No. 22, Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Radionuclides in Air and Water for Occupational Exposure, (Published as National Bureau of Standards Handbook 69, Issued June 1959, superseding Handbook 52).

International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 2, Report of Committee II on Permissible Dose for Internal Radiation (1959), with 1962 Supplement Issued in ICRP Publication 6; Publication 9, Recommendations on Radiation Exposure, (1 965);

ICRP Publication 7 (1 965), amplifying specific recommendations of Publication 9 concerning environmental monitoring; and ICRP Publication 26 (1 977).

Federal Radiation Council Report No. 1, Background Material for the Development of Radiation Protection Standards, May 13, 1960.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 39, Basic Radiation Protection Criteria, January 1971.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 62, Tritium in the Environment, March 1979.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 81,

Carbon-I4 in the Environment, May 1985.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 4. I, Programs for Monitoring Radioactivity in The Environs of Nuclear Power Plants, Revision I April 1975.

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Technical Position, An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.

American National Standards Institute, Inc., Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry, ANSI N545-1975.

17

I

15. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 4.13, Performance, Testing and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry: Environmental Applications, Revision 1, July 1977.

16. United States, Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 4.15, Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs (Normal Operations) - Effluent Streams and the Environment, Revision 1, February 1979.

17. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide I. 109, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision I, October 1977.

18. NUREG/CR-4068, Summary of Historical Experience with Releases of Radioactive Materials from Commercial Nuclear Power Plants in the United States, 1985.

19.

Olsen, C.R., et. al., 1980. Reactor-released Radionuclides and Fine-grained Sediment Transport and Accumulation Patterns in Barnegat Say, New Jersey and Adjacent Shelf Waters. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science (I 980) 10, I 19-142.

20.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1986 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1987.

21. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1987 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1988.

22.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1988 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1989.

23.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1989 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1990.

24.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1990 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1991.

25.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1991 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1992.

I I

26.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1992 Radiological Envir'onmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1993.

I

27.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1993 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station'.

May 1994.

I

28.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1994 Radiological Environmental I

Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1995.

I 4

29.

GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1995 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1996.

I I

30.

GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1997.

I

31.

GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1997 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1998.

I I

I 1

1

32. GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1998 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1999.

I a

D l

33.

GPU Nuclear, Inc. I999 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 2000.

34.

AmerGen Energy Company, LtC. 2000 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station. May 2001.

35.

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. 2001 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station May, 2002.

36.

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station May, 2003.

37.

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. 2003 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station May, 2004.

19

I

38.

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Generating Station Radioactive Effluent Release Report, January 1,2004 through December 31 I 2004, March 2005.

39. AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station May, 2005.

NUREG-1302, ODCM Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls fbr BWR, April 1991.

II 8

40.

r I

20

I I

I APPENDIX A I

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR -

THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 CONTROL LOCATION MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION ##

NUMBER OF (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTINE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (PCULITER)

H-3 28 GAMMA 28 MN-54 CO-58 FE-59

?

I CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 200 15 15 30 15 30 15 30 I75 168 187 23 INDICATOR 0

(0/16)

(0/12)

( o m BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK

(<135/<196)

(<128/<200)

(<177/<196) 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 4

5 5

94 CONTROL 0

(0/16)

(0/12)

GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<2/<7)

(<3/<7)

(<3/<7) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 4

(0/16)

(<2/<6) 9 (0/16)

(<3/<14) 5 (011 6)

(<2/<6) 4 (0/!2)

(<4/<6) 9

(<7/<13) 5 (0/12)

(<4/<7)

(042)

=

24 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 2.1 MILES E OF SITE 24 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY

2. I MILES E OF SITE 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAZ OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 10 10 24 INDICATOR 9

(<3/<14)

(<7/< 1 5)

(< 1 O/< 1 0) 2.1 MILES E OF SITE BARNEGAT BAY (O/I 6)

(0/12)

(0/2) 0 5

5 5

94 CONTROL 0

(0/16)

(0112)

GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<2/<7)

(<4/<6)

(<4/<6) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 8

8 24 INDICATOR 8

(<3/<12)

(<5/< 12)

(<8/<9) 2.1 MILES E OF SITE BARNEGAT BAY (0/16)

(0/12)

( 0 4 0

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDlCATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

?

h, TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK-GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN

MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER QF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTlNE REPORTED MEASUREMENTS MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

WELL WATER (PCVLITER) 1-131 cs-134 CS-137 BA-I 40 LA-140 H-3 GAMMA MN-54 CO-5 8 12 12 15 15 18 60 15 200 15 15 8

(0/16)

(<2/<

15) 4 (0116)

(<2/<6) 4 (O/I 6)

(<2/<7) 25

{0/16)

(<7/<38) 7 (0/16)

(<2/< 12) 174 (0/8)

(< 1 5 7/<197) 5 W8)

(<3/<6) 5 (018)

(<3/<9) 8

{<6/<13) 4 (0/12)

(<3/<5) 5 (0/12)

{<3/<7) 22

(<I 6K32) 7

{<4/<11) 185

(<I 57/239)

(0/12)

( 1/41 4

{ <3/<6) 4

( ~ 3 1 ~ 6 )

W4)

(014) 24 INDICATOR 0

BARNEGAT BAY 2.1 MILES E OF SITE 33 INDICATOR 0

EAST OF RT 9 BRIDGE IN OCGS DISCHARGE 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPEClFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F) 94 CONTROL GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SS W OF SITE 24 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 2.1 MILES E OF SITE 24 INDICATOR-BARNEGAT BAY

2. I MILES E OF SITE 37 CONTROL BOOX RD AT LACEY MUA PUMPING STA 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 1 INDICATOR ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS 0.2 MILES 38 INDICATOR 1.6 MILES SSW OF SITE RT 532 - OCEAN TOWNSHIP MUA PUMPING

?

w TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONTTORJNG PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATTNG STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE ME AS UREMENT)

(LLD)

DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 CONTROL LOCATION MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER OF (F)

(F)

NAME NONROWTINE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DI RECTlON REPORTED LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN MEASUREMENTS 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 FE-59 30 CO-60 15 ZN-65 30 NB-95 15 ZR-95 30 15 15 18 37 CONTROL 0

BOOX RD AT LACEY MUA PUMPING STA 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 1 INDICATOR 0

ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS 0.2 MILES 1 INDICATOR 0

ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS 0.2 MILES I INDICATOR 0

ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS 0.2 MILES 1 INDICATOR 0

ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS 0.2 MILES 1

38 INDICATOR 0

RT 532 -OCEAN TOWNSHIP MUA PUMPING I.6 MILES SSW OF SITE 1 INDICATOR 0

ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS 0.2 MTLES 1 INDICATOR 0

ON-SITE DOMESTIC WELL AT OCGS 0.2 MILES

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK-GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LlMlT (F)

(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE MEASUREMENT)

( L W DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 CONTROL LOCATION MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER 0-F (F)

(F)

RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NAME NONROUTINE MEASUREMENTS BA-140 LA-140 BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

GAMMA (PCIKG WET)

K-40 MN-54

?

e CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 60 15 3

NA 130 130 260 I30 260 75 (O/&)

(<19/<379)

NA NA NA NA NA NA 48 116 38 INDICATOR 0

W4)

(0/4)

RT 532 - OCEAN TOWNSHIP MUA PUMPING

(<20/<106)

(<22/<379) 1.6 MILES SSW OF SITE 18 43 38 INDICATOR 0

W4)

RT 532 - OCEAN TOWNSHIP MUA PUMPING

(<6/<3 5)

(<7/<145) 1.6 MlLES SSW OF SITE 2803 2803 94 CONTROL 0

(313)

(3/3)

GREAT BAYMTTLE EGG HARBOR (2250/3460)

(2250/3460) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 36 36 94 CONTROL 0

(0/3)

(013)

GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<30/<42.)

. (<30/<42) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 41 41 94 CONTROL 0

W3)

(013)

GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<30/<55)

(<30/<55) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 84 84 94 CONTROL 0

(0/3)

(013)

(<48/<106)

(<48/<106) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR 43 43 94 CONTROL 0

W3)

GREAT BAYkITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<34/<51)

(<34/<5 I )

20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 78 78 94 CONTROL 0

(013)

(0/3)

GREAT BAYlLITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<59/<88)

(<5 9/-=88) 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-l RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION Location o f Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE MEASUREMENT)

( L W DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 CONTROL LOCATION MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER OF (F)

(F)

NAME RANGE RANGE LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN NONROUTINE REPORTED MEASUREMENTS DISTANCE AND DIRECTION PREDATOR (FISH)

(POIXG WET)

CS-134 CS-137 GAMMA K-40 MN-54 (20-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 13 130 150 NA 130 I30 260 130 260 94 CONTROL GREAT BAYlLITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL GREATBAY/LlTTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 93 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 93 INDICATOR OCGS DISCIIARGE - BETWEEN PIJMP/KI'9 0 1 MlI,ES WSW OF SmE 93 lNDICATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 93 INDICATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 93 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMPiRT 9 0.1 MlLES WSW OF SITE

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATlON VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION O F DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS 1s INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORRING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 I9 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATlONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN

MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER 0-F PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENTS MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

CLAMS PCI/KG WET cs-I 34 (3-137 GAMMA K-40 MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 6

130 150 NA 130 130 260 130 NA 36 (0/9)

(<29/<4 6) 42 (0/9)

(<35/<5 1) 1059 (3/4)

(942/1250) 63

(<38/<109) 74

(<42/<120) 143

(<68/<235) 63

(<29/<101) 139 (014)

(014)

(0/4)

W4)

(014)

(<63/-=234) 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/clTTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SlTE 94 CONTROL GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MlLES ENE OF SlTE 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 23 1NDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVTRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE MEASUREMENT)

( L W DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 REPORTING PERIOD:

ZOOS CONTROL LOCATION MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER OF (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTINE RANGE RANGE DiSTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN MEASUREMENTS CRABS (PCIKG WET) cs-134 CS-137 GAMMA K-40 MN-54

?

4 CO-5 8 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 1

100 100 NA 130 I30 260 130 NA 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 24 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 2.1 MILES E OF SITE 93 INDICATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 93 INDICATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE OCGS DlSCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 93 INDICATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SiTE OCGS DISCHAWE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 93 INDICATOR 0.1 MTLES WSW OF SITE OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 93 INDTCATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMPRT 9 93 INDICATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK-GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER 0-F PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTTNE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPO-RT E D ME A SURE MENT) iLLW MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT (PCIKG DRY) cs-134 CS-137 GAMMA BE-7 K-40

?

00 MN-54 CO-58 8

CO-60 CS-134 100 100 NA NA NA NA NA 150 0

93 INDICATOR 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE NA 52 (O/I)

OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9

(<5 2)

NA 71 93 INDICATOR 0

i0/1)

OCGS DISCHARGE - BETWEEN PUMP/RT 9 (7

1 )

0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 440 63 1 23 TNDICATOR 0

(012)

( 1 /2)

BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK

(<365/<515)

(<232/1030) 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 18800 18800 94 CONTROL 0

(2/2)

W2)

GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR (17400/2fl200)

(1 7400/20200) 20.0 MlLES SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL 0

GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL 0

GREAT BAY/LTTTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL 0

GREAT BAYLITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE 0

94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 MILES SSW OF SITE

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVtATlON VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADlOLOGlCAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONlTORlNG PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATlON MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTINE REPORTED AIR PARTICULATE (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

CS-137 GR-B SR-89 SR-90 GAMMA BE-7 MN-54 CO-58 CO-60 360 28 28 28 I80 10 10 10 NA NA NA NA 46 (C27187) 14 (28 7/3 0 8)

(< 5 /40) 6.9 (0/24)

(< 5.5/< 9.4) 4.7 (0/24)

(< 3. 2 k 6.6)

( 1 /6) 57.3 (24124)

(4 1 11 06) 1.8 (0124)

(< 0.5K 3.4) 2.1 (0/24)

(i 0.71< 5.1) 1.8 (0/24)

(< 0.4/< 3.2) 54

(<45/<63) 15 (49152)

(61150) 7.7 (014)

(< 6. 3 k 8.7) 4.7

(< 3. 2 k 6.3)

( 0 4 (014)

=-

~

64.5 (50/88)

(4/4) 1.5 (0/4)

(< I.0/< 2.4) 1.8 (0/4)

(< 1. I / < 3.1)

I.5 W4)

(< 1.O/< 2.3) 57

( 1 /2)

(<2 7/8 7) 15 (49/52)

(6/<50) 7.7 (0/4)

(< 6.3K 8.7) 5.1 W4)

(< 3. 6 1 ~

6.6) 71.8 (52/1 06) 2.1 (014)

(< 1.o/< 3.3)

(414) 2.5

(< 1.2/< 5.1) 2.1 (0/4)

(< 1.O/< 3,2)

W4) 23 INDICATOR 0

BARNEGAT BAY OFF STOUTS CREEK 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE C CONTROL 0

JCP&L OFFICE - COOKSTOWN NJ 24.7 MILES NW OF SITE C CONTROL 0

JCP&L OFFICE - COOKSTOWN NJ 24.7 MILES NW OF SITE 3 INDICATOR 0

COAST GUARD STATION - ISLAND BEACH ST PK 6.0 MILES E OF SITE 71 INDICATOR 0

RT 532 AT WARETOWN MUNICP-AL BLDG 1.6 MILES SSE OF SITE 73 INDKATOR 0

BAY PARKWAY - SANDS POINT HARBOR I.8 MILES ESE OF SITE 73 INDICATOR 0

BAY PARKWAY - SANDS POINT HARBOR 1.8 MILES ESE OF SITE 0

COAST GUARD STATION - ISLAND BEACH ST PK 3 INDICATOR 6.0 MILES E OF SITE

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED 1N PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-l RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONlTORlNG PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEKGENERATING STATION, 2005 Name of Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 I9 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER Ll-MIT (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTI NE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

MEASUREMENTS AIR IODINE (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

VEGETATION

?

L 0

cs-I34 cs-137 1-131 SR-89 SR-90 GAMMA BE-7 K-40 1-131 360 24 24 24 50 60 70 25 5

NA NA 60 1.9 (0/24)

(< 0.W 4.5) 1.7 (0/24)

(< 0.5k 3.8) 20 (0/308)

(4 1/<39) 16 (0/15)

(< 1 1 /<23) 13 (1 4/15)

(<3/20) 238 (6/15)

( 102/424) 3429 (1 5/15)

(2570/4870) 39 (0/1 5 )

(< 14/<5 8) 1.8 W4)

(< 0.9k 3.8) 1.6 (014)

(< 1.0/< 2.7) 22 (0/52)

(<6/< 1 60) 20 W9)

(< 1 5/<24) 23 (9/9)

(4/39) 161 (72/282) 4187 (919)

(2300/6520) 33 W 9 )

(< 10149)

W9) 2.2

(< 0.9k 3.9) 1.8 (014)

(0/4)

(< O N < 3. I )

22 (0/52)

(<6/<I60) 20

( 4 5/<24) 23 W9)

(9/9)

(4/39) 239 (1 59/3 17) 4187 (9/9)

(230016520) 39 (3W (016)

(< 14/<53) 73 INDICATOR 0

BAY PARKWAY - SANDS POINT HARBOR 1.8 MILES ESE OF SITE 72 INDICATOR 0

LACEY RD AT KNIGHT OF COLUMBUS HALL 1.9 MILES NNE OF SITE C CONTROL 0

JCP&L OFFICE - COOKSTOWN NJ 24.7 MILES NW OF SITE 36 CONTROL 23.1 MILES NW OF SITE U-PICK FARM - NEW EGYPT N1 36 CONTROL 23.1 MILES NW OF SITE U-PICK FARM - NEW EGYPT NJ 66 INDICATOR 0

EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 36 CONTROL 23.1 MILES NW OF SITE U-PICK FARM -NEW EGYPT N1 0

66 INDICATOR 0

EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

?

Y I

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGTCAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATTNG STATION, 2005 Name o f Facility:

OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEDlUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN*

PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (Fj (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE MEASUREMENT)

(LLD)

DOCKET NUMBER:

50-2 19 REPORTING PERIOD:

2005 CONTROL LOCATION MEAN*

MEAN*

STATION #

NUMBER OF (F)

(F)

NAME NONROUTINE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED LOCATION WlTH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN MEASUREMENTS CS-134 cs-137 BA-140 LA-I40 60 18 (0/15)

(<7/<28) 80 25 (34 5 j

(<12/<37)

NA 99 (011 5)

(<38/<159)

NA 29 (OI15)

(-4 01~54)

TLD-QUARTERLY 194 NIA 11.5 (1 864 86)

DIRECT RADIATION 2004 DATA (7.4I18.2)

(MILLl-R0ENTGENlSTD.QUARTER

. 11.9-( 8 4 (9.511 4.4) 66 INDICATOR 0

EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 66 INDICATOR 0

0.4 MILES SE OF SITE EAST OF RT 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG 66 INDICATOR 0.4 MTLES SE OF SITE EAST OF Rr 9 AND SOUTH OF OCGS DISCHG 55 INDICATOR 0

OCGS SWITCHYARD 0.3 MILES W OFSITE-

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

I APPENDIX B I

LOCATION DESIGNATION, SAMPLE COLLECTION d

DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND

& ANALYTICAL METHODS

TABLE B-I :

Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station I

Sample Medium APT = Air Particulate Clam = Clam AIO

= Air Iodine TLD = Thermoluminescent W

A

= Well Water Dosimetry VEG = Vegetation Fish = Fish I

Crab = Crab SWA = Surfacewater AQS = Aquatic Sediment 1

Station Code Stations Designation 1

Distance Distance from the OCGS in miles I

Azimuth Azimuth with respect to the OCGS in degrees Description I

Meteorological sector in which the station is located and a narrative description B-1

TABLE B-2:

Radiological Envjronmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 Sample I

Medium TLD WWA APT, AIO, TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD I

APT, AIO, TLD TLD TLD APT, AIO TLD I

SWA, CLAM, AQS SWA, CLAM, AQS SWA, AQS, FISH VEG VEG WWA W

A Stat ion Izpde 1

1 3

I1 I

4 h

5 1

6 8

9 C

11 14 20 22 23 24 33 35 36 37 38 Distance

@J.w 0.4 0.1 0.2 6.0 4.6 4.2 2.1 2.3 2.0 24.7 8.2 20.8 0.7 1.6 3.6 2.1 0.4 0.4 23.1 2.2 1.6 Azimuth 4j4Pf-w 219 209 349 97 213 353 13

177, 2 30 31 3 152 2

95 145 64 101 123 111 319 18 197 SW ofsite at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ On-site southern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ On-site northern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ East of site, near old Coast Guard Station, Island Beach State Park SSW of site, Route 554 and Garden Parkway, Barnegat, NJ North of site, at Garden State Rest Area, Forked River, NJ NNE of site, Lane Place, behind St. Pius Church, Forked River, NJ South of site, Route 9 at the Waretown Substation, Waretown, NJ SW of site, where Route 532 and the Garden State Parkway meet, Waretown, NJ NW of site, JCP&L office in rear parking lot, Cookstown, NJ SSE of site, 80th and Anchor Streets, Harvey Cedars, NJ North of site, Larrabee Substation on Randolph Road, Lakewood, NJ East of site, on Finninger Farm on south side of access road, Forked River, NJ SE of site, on tong Silver Way, Skippers Cove, Waretown, NJ ENE of site, Barnegat Bay off Stouts Creek, approximately 400 yards SE of Flashing Light I East of site, Barnegat Bay, approximately 250 yards SE of Flashing Light 3 ESE of site, east of Route 9 Bridge in OCGS Discharge Canal ESE of site, east of Route 9 and north of the OCGS Discharge Canal, Forked River, NJ NW of site, at U-Pick Farm, New Egypt, NJ NNE of Site, off Boox Road at Lacey MUA Pumping Station, Forked River, NJ SSW of Site, on Route 532, at Ocean Township MUA Pumping Station, Waretown, NJ 6-2

TABLE B-2:

RadiologicaI Environmental Monitoring Frograni - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 I

1 I

I

~

Sample Medium TLD TLD

'TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD I

TLD

, I TLD TLD TLD APT, AIO, TLD, VEG TLD APT, AIO, TLD Station I;nde 46 47 48 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 71 Distance m

5.6 4.6 4.5 0.4 0.3 0.3' 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.3 I

.6 Azimuth Ldeareesl 323 26 189 358 333 309 2 88 263 249 2 06 188 166 1 04 83 70 48 19 133 265 164 I

NNW of site, on Lacey Road, Forked River, NJ NNE of site, Harbor Inn Road, Bayville, NJ South of s,ite, at Brboks and Schoolhouse Roads, Barnegat, NJ North of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ I

NNW of site, on tie access road to Fyked River site, Forked River, NJ NW of site, at sewage lift station on the access road to the Forked River site, Forked River, NJ WNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ West of site, on Southern Area Stores security fence, west of OCGS Switchyard, Forked River, NJ WSW of site, on utility pole east of Southern Area Stores, west of the OCGS Switchyard, Forked River, NJ SSW of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ 4'

South of site':'on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ SSE of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Waretown, NJ ESE of site, on Route 9 south of OCGS Main Entrance, Forked River, NJ East of site, on Route 9 at access road to OCGS Main Gate, Forked River, NJ ENE of site, on Route 9, between mhin gate and OCGS North Gate access road, Forked River, NJ NE of site, on Route 9 at entrance to Finninger Farm, Forked River, NJ NNE of site, on Route 9 at Intake Canal Bridge, Forked River, NJ SE of site, east of Route 9 and south of the OCGS Discharge Canal, inside fence, Waretown, NJ West of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 71.7, Lacey Township, NJ SSE of site, on Route 532 at the Waretown Municipal Building, Waretown, NJ 6-3

I 8

TABLE B-2:

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 Sample 4

Station Medium GQfk APT, AIO, TLD 72 APT, AIO, TLD 73 TLD TLD TtD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD I

TLD TLD TLD TtD FISH, CRAB SWA, AQS, CLAM, FISH TLD TLD TLD 74 II I

75 78 79 81 a2 84 85 86 88 89 90 92 93 94 98 99 T I I

Distance lmilesl 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.8 2.9 3.5 4.4 4.4 3.9 5.0 6.6

6.

6.3 9.0 0.1 20.0 1.3 1.5 0.4 Azimuth ldeareesl 25 108 88 71 2

160 201 36 332 250 224 125 108 75 46 242 198 292 310 219 NNE of site, on Lacey Road at Knights of Columbus Hall, Forked River, NJ ESE of site, on Bay Parkway, Sands Point Harbor, Waretown, NJ East of site, Orlando Drive and Penguin Court, Forked River, NJ ENE of site, Beach Blvd. and Maui Drive, Forked River, NJ North of site, 1514 Arient Road, Forked River, NJ SSE of site, Hightide Drive and Bonita Drive, Waretown, NJ SSW of site, on Rose Hill Road at intersection with Barnegat Boulevard, Barnegat, NJ NE of site, Bay Way and Clairmore Avenue, Lanoka Harbor, NJ NNW of site, on Lacey Road, 1.3 miles west of the Garden State Parkway on siren pole, Lacey Township, NJ WSW of site, on Route 532, just east of Wells Mills Park, Waretown, NJ SW of site, on Route 554, 1 mile west of the Garden State Parkway, Barnegat, NJ SE of site, eastern end of 3'd Street, Barnegat light, NJ ESE of site, Job Francis residence, Island Beach State Park ENE of site, parking lot A-5, Island Beach State Park NE of site, at Guard Shackmoll Booth, Island Beach State Park WSW of site, OCGS Discharge Canal between Pump Discharges and Route 9, Forked River, NJ SSW of site, in Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor WNW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.3, Lacey Township, NJ NW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.8, Lacey Township, NJ SW of site, at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ B-4

~

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summa6 of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, TABLE B-3:

Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 An a I ys i s Sampling Method Sample Size Sample Collection Procedure N urn be r Analytical Procedure - Number Gamma Spectroscopy Grab Sample 1 gallon ER-OCGS-06, Collection of surface water samples for radiological analysis TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis Surface Water k Env. Inc.. GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-I 3 analysis by liquid scintillation Tritium Grab Sample ER-OCGS-06, Collection of surface water samples for radiological analysis 1 gallon Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)

TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis Well Water i Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly samples composited quarterly 1 gallon ER-OCGS-10, Collection of well water samples for radiological analysis CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection procedure - well water ER-OCGS-10, Collection of well water samples for radiological analysis CY-OC-120-1200, REMP sample collection procedure - well water ER-OCGS-14, Collection of fish samples for radiological analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy Tritium 1 gallon Well Water Monthly samples composited quarterly TBE, TBE-2010 Tritium and carbon-13 analysis by liquid scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method)

TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples collected via hook and line technique and traps 1000 grams (wet)

Fish Env. lnc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopv TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis I Clamsand Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual and annual samples collected using clam tongs and traps.

ER-OCGS-16, Collection of clam and crab samples for radiological analysis 1000 grams (wet)

Env. Inc.. GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by aamma spectroscopv TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab samples ER-OCGS-03, Collection of aquatic sediment samples for radiological analysis 1000 grams (dry)

Env. Inc., GS:OI Oetermination Gf gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopv 1 -

8-5

TABLE B-3:

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2005 Air Particulates 1

Sample I

Analysis I Sampling Method paper Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly composite of Collection Procedure Number Gamma Spectroscopy Sample Size One-week composite of continuous air sampling through charcoal filter Analytical Procedure Number Gamma Spectroscopy Grab sample during growing season Medium Gross Beta ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air particulate samples for radiological analysis 1 filter (approximately 300 cubic meters weekly)

TBE, TBE-2008 Gross alpha andlor beta activity in various -

matrices)

One-week composite of continuous air sampling through glass fiber filter Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta in air particulate filters TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis 13 filters (approximately 4000 cubic meters)

TBE, TBE-2023 Compositing of samples Env. Inc., AP-03 Procedure for compositing air particulate filters for gamma spectroscopic analysis each station Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy 1

Strontium-89/90 ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air particulate samples for radiological analysis TBE, TBEi2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion exchange Air Particulates Quarterly composite of each station 13 filters (approximately 4000 cubic meters) 1 filter (approximately 300 cubic meters weekly)

TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis ER-OCGS-05, Collection of air iodine and air particulate samples for radiological analysis Air Iodine Env. Inc., I-13t-02 Determination of 1-131 in charcoal canisters bv Gamma spectroscow (batch method)

TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotopes analysis ER-OCGS-04, Colfection of food products and broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis 1000 grams Vegetation Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by Qamma spectroscow TBE, TBE-2019 Radiostrontium analysis by ion exchange S t rontium-89/90 ER-OCGS-04, Collection of food products and broadleaf vegetation samples for radiological analysis ER OCGS-02, Collection of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) for radiological analysis 1000 grams Grab sample during growing season Vegetation 2 dosimeters ICN PharmaceuticallGlobaI Dosimetry, Inc.

Dosimetry comprised of two Panasonic 814 (containing 3 each B-6

Figure B-I I

I I

8-7

Figure B-2 Ocean Oyster Creek Generating Station (DCGS)

Locaiions of Radiological Emcizrrmental Monitoring Program v)

Siations grtater than 2 miles h m the OCGS 8-8

/

I I

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES PRIMARY LABORATORY

, TAFLE C-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER f 2 SIGMA I

COLLECTION 23 24 33 I

94 I

P E ~ I O D I

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC I

MEAN*

< 196

< 177 187 f 27 c 174 183 & 25

< 159 c 191

< 192 c 190 c 178

-= 172

< 159 c 135

< 155

< 179 c 171

< 172

< 19d

< 200

< 128 c 190

< 197 c 179

< 161

< 162

'< 134 c 153

< 175

< 160

< 175 171 2 35 168 f 46

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES c-1

TABLE C-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCIILITER 2 2 SIGMA

< 7 STC COLLECTIOF Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-1 31 cs-134 cs-137 Ba-I 40 La-140 PERIOD 23 JAN FEB MAR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC APR

< 4

< 10

< 6 c 9

< 4

< 8

< 3

= < 4 -

< 23

< 6 -

< 3

< 4

< 8

< 10

< 4 c 30 MEAN*

4 f

2 0

t!J 24 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 4

1 9

2 5

f 3

8 5 1

< 4

< 10

< 5

< 10 12

< 5 4

7 8 f 0. 4 9 i 3 3

1

< 4 9

< 15 4

4 k O 2 7 i 1 0 7 f 2

< 22 c 38

< 12 MEAN' 4 k 0. 5 5 k 3 I l k 3 5 f 0.2 10 f 0.2 5 It 1 8 k l 12 f 9 4 f 0. 2 4 f 1 3 0

2 3 1 0

7

TABLE C-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllLlTER f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTIOF Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-1 31 cs-134 cs-137 Ba-I 40 La-I 40 PERIOD 33 JAN

< 4

< 5

< 8

< 4

< 9

< 5

< 7

< 4

< 22

< 7 FEB

< 5

< 6

< 13

< 5

< 11

< 7 c 10

< 10

< 6

< 5

< 34

-=a MAR

< 3

< 7

< 3

< 8

< 3

< 6 c 5

< 3

< 15 4

APR

< 6

< 4

< 10

< 6

< 9

< 4

< 7

< 6

< 5

< 26

< 4 MAY

< 5

< 11

< 5

< 11

< 5

< 10

< 5

< 6

< 28

< 9 JUN

< 5

< 6 4 12

< 5

< 9

< 7

< 8

< 9

< 6

~6

< 29

< 9 JUL c 7

< 6

< 14

< 6 14

< 7

< 12

< 9

< 6

< 7 c 30

< 9 AUG

< 2

< 3

< 2

< 3

< 2

< 3

< 2

< 7

< 2 SEP

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 3 3

< 13

< 4 OCT

< 5

< 10

< 5

< 11

< 6

< 10

< 12

< 5

< 32

< 10 NOV

< 4

< 3

< 9

< 5

< 8

< 3

< 7

< 1 j

< 3 c 4

< 27

< 7 DEC

< 4

< a

< 5

< 10

< 5

< 9

< 7

< 4

< 5

< 17

< 7 MEAN*

2 94 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 4

3 4 k 3 9

6 4

3 9

5 5

4 8

5 8

6 4 + 3 5

3 2 3

1 7 c 18

< 27

< 17

< 31

< 24 c 21

< 20

< 17

< 16

< 30 c 32

< 16 7

5 MEAN*

5 k 2 4

1 9

4 5 -

2 10 f 5 5

2 8 2 4 8

5 4

2 5

2 2 2 k 1 2 7

4

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSlTlVE VALUES

TABLE C-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllLlTER f 2 SlGMA COLLECTION 1

37 38 PERIOD JAN - MAR

< 197 239 f 124

< 191 APR - JUN 11 1 < 163

< 163 e 165 JUL - SEP

< 181

< 182 OCT - DEC k

c 157

< 157 c 158 I

I MEAN*

175 f 36 185 f 75 174 f 30 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES c-4

TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllLlTER f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 zr-95 1-1 31 CS-I 34 CS-1 37 Ba-140 La-1 40 PERIOD 1

?

cn 37 JAN 4 4 FEB MAR APR

< 5 MAY JUN JUL

- = 6 AUG SEP OCT c 4 NOV OEC MEAN*

5 ? 2 JAN

- = 4 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

-=3

- = 6 c 3 e 5 c 6 4 6

< 3 5 ? 2

< 4 e 6 e 5 e 7

- = 3 5 f 3

- = 4 9

e 11 c 14 c 6 10 ? 6

< 8

- = 9

< 9

-= 11

< 17 12

< 32

< 5 c 7 9 ? 6 16 f 22 8

< 10 MEAN*

4 f 3 4 f 2 11 f 7 5 f 2 9

3 6 f 4 9

f 4

< 24

< 48

< 50

< I 9 35 f 32

< 26

< 43

< 106 C 9

< 14

< 5 11 f 9 C 9

< 21

-= 35 c 6 35 2

33 4 f 2 5 2 0 48 f 79 18 * -26

TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllLlTER f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-1 31 CS-I 34 CS-1 37 Ba-740 La-I 40 38 JAN

< 4

< 3 c 6 3

7

< 4

~6

< a

< 3

< 4 c 24

< 7 PERIOD FEB MAR APR

< 5 c 5

< 6 5

7

< 5

< 8

< 29.

4 4

< 38 c 13 MAY JUN JUL

< 23

< 7 c 11 10

< 13

< 667 c 6

< 6 AUG SEP OCT

< a c 5 6

c 3 c 7 6

< 3

< 4 NOV DEC 5

c 3

< 379

< 22 145

< 7 MEAN*

116 f 352 43

?

136 5 k 2 5 f 6 1 1 f 1 6 5 2 3 8

5 6 f 6 9 2 6 177 k 653 4 f 2 4 f 2

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-111.1 STC COLLECTlON PERIOD CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR AND BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

SAMPLES COLLECTED 1N THE VlCINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 -

RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET f 2 SIGMA K-40 Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 21-1-65 cs-134 cs-i 37 33 93 93 33 93 93 33 33 33 94 f)

-.I 94 04/27 - 04/27/05 04/27 - 04/27/05 04/28 - 04/28/05 05/24 - 05/24/05 10/04 - 10/04/05 10/04 - 10/04/05 10103 - 10/05/05 10/05 - 10/05/05 10/05 - 10/06/05 MEAN*

PREDATOR 04/26 - 04/26/05 04/26 - 04/26/05 10104 - 10/04/05 10/04 - 10/04/05 MEAN*

BOTTOM FEEDER 04/26 - 04/26/05 10/04 - 10/04/05 10/04 - 10/04/05 MEAN*

3690 f 837

< 33 4210 f 788

< 30 4650 f 1020

< 52 3940 f 574

< 30 2920 f 650

< 36 5190 f 952 c 46 4610 f 688

< 38 4910 f 820

< 49 4700 f 858 c 39

< 32

< 38 c 26

< 40

< 59

< 36

< 49

< 41

< 56

< 69

< 63

< 116

< 66

< 106

< 91 c 100

< 97

< 77

< 34

< 37

< 60 2 32

< 40

< 57

< 33

< 47

< 31

< 86

< 67

< 103

< 70 c 72

< 94

< 76

< 97

< 74

< 35

< 29

< 43

< 29

< 36

< 41

< 31 c 46

< 37

< 40

< 38 c 51

< 35

< 39

< 43

< 38

< 47

< 47 4313 f 1406 39 f 16 42 f 22 87 f 38 41 f 22 82 f 26 36 f 12 42 & 10 4680 f 834

< 49 4070 f 689

< 20 4860 f 927

< 55 4440 f 847

< 34 4513 f 683 39 f 31 2700 f 756

< 30 3460 f 657

< 35 2250 f 745

< 42 c 49

< 28

< 57

< 39 43 f 25

< 30

< 40 c 55

< 94 c 50

< 141

< 75 90 f 77 L

< 48 c 97

< 106

< 49

< 46

< 58

< 29 46 i 24

< 34

< 44

<. 51

< 99 c 53

< 91

< 77 80 f 40

< 59

< 87

< 88

< 52

< 21

< 55

< 33 40 f 32 26

< 38

< 41

< 46

< 30 c 60

< 39 44 f 26

< 33

< 35

< 47 2803

1223 36 f 12 41 f 25 84 f 63 43 f 17 78 f 33 35 f 16 38 f 16 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-111.2 STC COLLECTION PERIOD CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM AND CRAB SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCVKG WET f 2 SIGMA K-40 Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 21-1-65 CS-1 34 CS-1 37 23 CLAMS 04/26 - 04/26/05 974 f 508

< 38

< 44 c 68

< 29

< 63

< 39

< 39 10/03 - 10/03/05

~

< 1070

< 109 c 120 235 e 101

< 234

< 90 c 84

=

MEAN' 1022 f 136 74 f 100 82 f 108 152 f 236 65 f 103 148 f 242 64 f 72 61 f 65 24 CLAMS 04/25 - 04/25/05 1250 f 721

< 40 c 42

< 90

< 35 c 73 c 48

< 46 10/03 - 10/03/05 942 f 583 c 66

< 91

< 181 c 89

< 185

< 78 c 90 MEAN*

1096 f 436 53 f 37 67 f 70 135 f 129 62 f 77 129 f 159 63 f 43 68 f 62 94 CLAMS 04/26 - 04/26/05 1550 f 564 c 22

< 21

< 46

< 46 e 57 e 21

< 27 10/04 - 10/04/05 1740 f 9t2

< 57

< 39

< 114 c 50 c 102 c 52

< 36 Q

co MEAN*

1645 f 269 40 f 50 30 f 25 80 f 97 48 f -6 80 f 63 37 f 45 31 k 13 93 CRABS f0/06 - 10/06/05 3260 f 925

< 62

<54

.C 139 46

< 144

< 52 c 71

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllKG DRY f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 CO-58 CO-60 cs-134 cs-I37 PERIOD 24 9

33 a

94 04/26/05 10/03/05 MEAN*

04/25/05 10/03/05 MEAN*

04/26/05 10/03/05 MEAN*

to30 f 459

< 232 631 f 1129 c 363 c 352 358 f 16

< 346 c 427 387 f 115 c 365

< 515 440 f 212 8310 f 963 4610 f 635 6460 f 5233 709 f 411 1990 f 534 1350 f 1812 2080 f 610 3230 f 631 2655 f 1626 20200 f 1750 17400 f 1590 18800 f 3960

< 33 c 25 29 f 11 c 35

< 37 36 f 3

< 38 c 38 38 f 0

< 42

< 54 48 f 17 28 c 29 29 f 2 c 33 40 37 f 10 c 37

< 43 40 f 8 c 42

< 50

=

46 f 10 26

< 26 26 f 0

< 26 c 40 33 f 20

< 32

< 42 37 f 15 c 42

=z 43 42 f 1 c 28 87 It 45

< 24

< 27 26 f 6 57 f 85

< 30

< 32

< 30

< 42 30 f 0 37 f 15 c 38 c 48 c 35

< 42 36 f 3 45 f 8 c 34

< 45 c 51

< 63 43 f 23 54 f 25

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 1

RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCllCU METER f 2 SIGMA GROUP I GROUP II GROUP Ill I

I WEEK 20 66 71 72 73 3

C 1

27 f 6 23 f 6 1 1 f 6 17 f 6 23 f 6 25 f 7 25 f 6 2

13 f 4 12 f 4 9 f 4 15 f 4 14 f 4 I 1 f 4 12 f 4 3

19 f 6 16 f 6 16 f 6 16 f 6 14 f 6 15 f 6 19 f 6 16 f 5 4

1 1 f 5 15 f 5 15 f 6 9 f 5 16 f 6 10 f 5 5

1 1 f 5 "1 0 f 5 7 f 5

< 7 1 1 f 5 12 f 5 10 f 5 6

16 f 5 13 f 5 9 k 5 10 f 5 13 f 5 9

5 19 f 5 7

20 f 5 b12 f 5 15 f 5 12 f 5 13 f 5 1 1 f 5 15 f 5 8

15 f 4 17 k15 15 f 5 13 f 5 I11 f 4 15 f 5 15 f 5 9

1 1 f 4 10 f 4 9

4 12 f 4 13 f 4 9 f 4 1 1 f 4 10 21 f 6 15 f 6 17 f 6 12 f 5 14 f 5 16 f 6 19 f 6 1 1 17 k 5 18 f 5 1 1 f 5 14

5 13 f 5 1 1 f 5 1 1 f 5 12 10 f 5 12 f 5 14 f 5 16 f 5 1 1 f 5 14 f 5 12 f 5 13 9 f 5

< 7 10 f 5 16 i 5 1 O f 5 c 7 10 f 5 14 9 f 4 7 f 4 7 f 4 9 f 5 13 f 5 8

4 614 15 8 f 5 15 f 5 15 f 5 12 *,5 1 1 f 5 9 f 5 15 f 5 16 13 f 5 21 f 5 15 f 5 13 f 5 13 f 5 8 f 4 15 f 5 17 12 f 5' 12 f 5 10 f 5 12 f 5 9 f 5 12 f 5 9 f 5 18 15 f 5 13 f 5 1 1 f 5 14 f 5 15 f 5 18 k 5 15 f 5 19 7

7 i 5

< 7 8 f 5 1 1 f 5 7 f 5

< 7 20 (1 1 8 f 4

< 5 12 f 4 10 f 4 1 1 i 4 12 f 4 21

< 10 1 1 f 5 8 f 5

< 8 8

< 8

< 8 22 6 i 4 c 6 8 k 4 7 f 4

< 6 8 f 4 7 f 4 23 12 f 5 1 2 i 6

< 7 8 f 5

< 7

< 7 10

6 24 16 f 5 12 f 4 14 f 4 14 f 5 15 f 5 1 1 f 4 15 f 5 9 f 5

< a 8 f 5 8 f 5 8 i 5

~8 8 f 5 13 f 4 13 f 4 12 f 4 10 f 4 1 1 f 4 8 f 4 15 f 4 26 27 10 f 5 8 k 5 12 f 5 1 1 f 5 8 & 5 7 f 5 9 f 5 28 15 f 5 14 f 5 17 f 5 13 f 5 1 1 f 5 13 f 5 14 f 5 29 12 f 5 12 i 5 l O f 5

< 8 1 1 f 5 1 1 f 5 10 f 5 30 14 f 5 17 f 5 15 f 5 19 f 5 22 f 5 20 f 5 16 f 5 31 18 f 5 18 1 5 18 f 5 21 f 5 19 f 5 18 f 5 18 f 5 32 31 f 6 26 f 6 28 f 6 23 f 6 27 f 6 21 k 6 24 f 6 21 + 6 33 21 f 6 20 f 6 16 f 6 14 f 6 16 f 6 34 20 f 5 25 f 6 20 f 5 24 f 6 25 f 6 19 f 5 18 f 5 t

35 8 i 4 12 f 5 8 f 4 10 f 5 7 f 4

< 7 1 1 f 5 36 14 f 4 15 f 4 15 f 4 14 f 4 14 f 4 15 f 4 15 f 4 37 23 f 6 24 i 6 24 f 6 21 f 6 18 f 6 17 f 6

< 50 (1) 38 16 f 5 15 f 5 14 f 5 15 f 5 12 f 5 15 f 5 16 f 5 39 24 f 6 22 f 6 17 f 6 25 f 6 26 i 6 15 f 6 21 f 6 40

< 6 13 f 4 12 f 4 16 f 5 14 f 4 16 f 5 13 f 4 41 13 f 5 10 f 4 12 f 6 7 f 4 13 f 7 8 f 4 8 f 4 42 14 f 5 10 f 5 (1)

(1) 1 1 f 5 (1) 9 f 5 43 8 f 4 7 f 4 9 f 4 7

7 f 4 10 f 5 9 f 5 44 1 6 1 5 1 6 k 5 17 f 5 13 f 5 17 f 5 16 f 5 16 f 5 45 27 f 6 26 f 6 26 i 6 25 f 6 28 f 6 27 f 6 29 f 6 25 I

13 f 6 46 19 f 5 19 f 5 14 f 4 21 f 5 16 f 5 16 k 5 16 f 5 47 19 k 6 17 f 6 16 f 5 18 f 6 20 f 6 17 f 6 21 f 6 48 12 f 5 7 f 4 10 f 5 8 f 4 8 f 4 I t f 5 7 f 4 49 18 f 5 18 f 5 15 f 5 15 f 5 16 f 5 19 f 5 17 f 5 50 26 f 6 30 f 6 25 f 6 28 f 6 26 f 6 30 f 6 29 f 6 51 12 f 5 22 f 5 17 f 5 13 f 5 17 f 5 10 f 5 17 f 5 52 28 f 5 26 f 5 40 f 7 30 f 5 21 f 5 24 f 5 28 f 5 MEAN*

15 f 12 15 f 12 14 f 13 14 f 1 1 14 f 1 1 13 f 1 1 15 f 15 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAAND POSITIVE VALUES c-10

TABLE C-V.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS (E-3 PCllCU METER) IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 GROUP I - ON-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE GROUP ill - CONTROL LOCATIONS LOCATIONS COLLECTlON MIN MAX.

MEANi COLLECTION MIN MAX.

M E A N i COLLECTION MIN MAX.

MEAN*

12/29/04 - 02/01/05 10 27 16 f 71 12/29/04 - 02/01/05

< 7 23 13 f 9 12/29/04 - 02/01/05 10 25 15f 12 PERIOD 2 SD' PERIOD 2 SD*

PERIOD 2 SD' 02/01/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/28/05 12/29/04 - 12/28/05 10 20

< 7 21 7

21

< 6 1 1

< 8 16 8

18 8

31 14 24

< 6 16 7

27 12 30 c 6 31 14 f 7 13 k 10 12

8 8 f 3 12

5 14 f 7 20 f 15 19 f 9 1 1 k 8 23 f 12 15

8 la f 13 02/01/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 1 1/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/28/05 12/29/04 - 12/28/05 9

15 10 17 7

15

< 5 12

< 7 15 x 8 22 12 26

< 7 17 8

28 13 40 7

2a

< 5 40 12f 4 13* 5 12k 5 8 h 4 10* 6 14k 9 18k 15 18k 10 12i 7 17f 13 22k 16 14 f 8 02/01/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/28/05 12/29/04 - 12/28/05 9

19 c 7 19 6

la c 7 12 e 7 15 7

20

< 7 24

< 15 50 8

16 7

29 10 30 6

50 1 3

7 12f 8 1 1 f 8 8 k 4 l o

6 13i 9 17 f 12 21 f 24 12k 7 18* 15 22 f 14 14 f 8

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSlTlVE VALUES

I TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCllCU METER f 2 SIGMA COLLECTION COLLECTION STC PERIOD S r-89 3-90 STC PERIOD Sr-89 5r-90 3

12/29/04 - 03/29/05

< 6.2

< 4.3 72 12/29/04 - 03/29/05

< 7.0

< 4.1 03/29/05 - 06/29/05

< 6.0 c 6.6 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 c 7.3

< 5.6 09/27/05 - 12/28/05

< 8.7 c 6.1 09/27/05 - 12/28/05

< 6.8 c 4.1 06/29/05 - 09/27/05

., < 7.5 c 3.6 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 c 7.4 c 4.3 I

MEAN' 7.1 $ 2.5 5.1

2.8 MEAN*

7.1 1 0.6 4.5 f 1.4 20 12/29/04 - 03/29/05

< 5.5 3.2 73 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 c 6.4

< 4.0 03/29/05 - 06/29/05

< 7.7 5.9 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 c 6.7

< 5.6 06/29/05 - 09/27/05

< 7.8

< 3.4 06/29/05 - 09/27/05

< 9.4

< 3.8 09/27/05 - 12/28/05

< 6.6 c 3.5 09/27/05 - 12/28/05 c 6.3

< 4.6 MEAN*

6.9 f 2.2 4.0 f 2.5 MEAN*

7.2 f 2.9 4.5 f 1.6 66 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 c 6.1

< 4.2 C

12/29/04 - 03/29/05

< 6.3

< 3.8 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 c 6.5 c 5.6 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 c 8.7

< 6.3 06/29/05 - 09/27/05

< 7.7

< 5.8 06/29/p5 - 09/27/05

< 8.6 e 5.3 09/27/05

12/28/05

< 6.9

< 3.8 09/27/05 - 12/28/05

< 7.0

< 3.2 I

MEAN*

6.8 f 1.3 4.8 f 2.0 MEAN' 7.7 f 2.4 4.7 f 2.8 71 12/29/04 - 03/29/05

< 6.1

< 4.8 I

03/29/05 - 06/29/05 c 6.2

< 6.1 06/29/05 - 09/27/05

< 7.0 c 4.4 09/27/05 - 12/28105

< 6.7 c 5.0 MEAN*

6.5 f 0.8 5.1 f 1.4 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES (2-12

TABLE C-V.4 CONCENTRATlON OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER f 2 SIGMA I

STC COLLECTION Be-7 Mn-54 CO-58 CO-60 (3-134 CS-1 37 PERIOD I

I 3

12/29 - 03/29/05 66 f 15

< 0.8 c 1.0 1.0 c 0.8 c 0.9 03/29 - 06/29/05 53 f 12

< 0.5

< 0.9

< 1.1 c 0.5 0.7 06/29 - 09/27/05 58 f 24

< 2.4

< 3.3 c 3.0

< 2.6 c 2.0 09/27 - 12/28/05 41 f 23

< 2.6

< 3.2 I

< 3.2 c 2.6 MEAN*

20 12/29 - 03/29/05 03/29 - 06/29/05 06/29

09/27/05 09/27 - 12/28/05 MEAN*

66 12/29

~

03/29/05 03/29 - 06/29/05 06/29 - 09/27/05 09/27 - 12/28/05 MEAN*

71 12129 - 03/29/05 03/29 - 06/29/05 06/29 - 09/27/05 09/27 - 12/28/05 MEAN*

72 12/29 - 03/29/05 03/29 - 06/29/05 06/29 - 09/27/05 09/27 - 12/28/05 MEAN*

73 12/29 - 03/29/05 03/29 - 06/29/05 06/29 - 09/27/05 09/27 - 12/28/05 MEAN*

C 12/29 - 03/29/05 03/29 - 06/29/05 06/29 - 09/27/05 09/27 - 12/28/05 MEAN*

55 f 21 1.6 f 2.2 1.9 f 2.4 2.1 f 1.3 1.7 f 2.7 1.6 f 1.8 57 f 11

< 0.7

< 0.4 c 0.6

< 0.6 43 f 12 4 1.2

< 1.3 c 1.4

< 1.0 c 1.0 67 f 30

< 1.5

< 2.0

< 1.7

< 1.6

< 1.5 44 f 18

< 3.3

< 3.6 c 2.7 c 3.2 c 3.6 I

53 f 23 1.7 f 2.2.

1.9 f 2.4 1.6 f 1.8 1.6 f 2.3 1.7 f 2.7 56 f 15

< 0.8 c 1.0

< 1.2 c 0.8

< 0.8 52 f 14 c 0.9

< 0.7

< 1.0

< 0.7

< 0.7 63 f 25 1.7

< 1.8

< 1.7

< 1.3

< 1.7 59 f 23 c 3.1 c 3.5 c 2.8

< 4.5 c 3.7 58 f 9 1.6 f 2.1 1.8 f 2.5 1.7 f 1.7 1.9 f 3.6 1.7 f 2.8 57 f 14

< 0.7 c 0.7

< 1.1 c 0.6

< 0.5 52 f 12

< 1.0 c 1.1 c.7.o

< 0.8 c 1.1 73 f 22

< 2.7

< 1.8

< 2.1 c 1.6 c 1.5 A06 f 33 c 3.4 c 4.1

< 2.7

< 3.8

< 3.8 72 f 49 1.9 f 2.6 1.9 i 3.0 1.7 f 1.6 1.7 f 2.9 1.7 f 2.9 55 f 18 c 1.0

< 1.6

< 1.2 c 1.0

< 1.2 55 f 17

=C 0.8

< 1.2

< 0.9

< 0.8 64 f 36

< 2.5 c 4.7

< 2.4 c 3.3

< 3.1 43 f 25

< 3.2

< 2.2

< 3.1

< 3.0

< 2.1 54 f 17 1.9 f 2.3 2.4 f 3.1 1.9 f 2.0 2.0 f 2.5 1.8 f 2.1 62 f 13 c 1.0

< 1.2

< 0.8

< 0.9 c: 1.0 42 f 16

< 1.4

< 1.4 c 0.9 c 1.1 c 1.4 55 f 37

< 3.3

< 5.1

< 3.0 c 2.7

< 1.7 53 f 15

< 2.9

< 2.5 c 2.4

< 3.9 c 2.8 53 f 16 2.1 f 2.2 2.5 f 3.6 1.8 k 2.2 2.2 f 2.8 1.7 f 1.5 68 k 13

< 1.0 c 1.1

< 1.0 c 0.9

< 1.0 50 f 13 c 1.2

< 1.2

< 1.2 c 1.0 1.2 88 f 25

< 1.6 c 1.9

< 1.6

< 1.6 c 1.5 53 f 18

< 2.4

< 3.1

< 2.3

< 3.8

< 2.7 65 f 35 1.5 f 1.3 1.8 f 1.8 1.5 f 1.1 1.8 f 2.8 1.6 f 1.6 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCUMTED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-I 3

TABLE C-VI.l CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 1

RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER f 2 SIGMA GROUP I I

GROUP I!

I GROUP 111 WEEK 20 66 71 72 73 3

C 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 I 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 1

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 MEAN*

< 12

-= 17

< 17

< 14

< 18 c 17

< 18

< 17

< 20 c 14

< 18 e 15

< 13 c 15 e 20 c 12

~

2 5

< 20 c 16 c 20 c 14 c 22

< 27 c 19 c 15 c 19 c 20

< 23

< 17

< 16

< 22 '

< 25

< 20

< 19

< 25 c 22

< 12

< 21

< 14

< 17

< 31

< 23

< 35

< 22

< 21 c 38

< 12 c 30 c 30 c 21

< 24 (1) 20 i 12

< 13 c 18 c 19 c 15

< 20 c 19 Ir < 20

< 191 c 21 c 16

< 18

< 16 C 13 c 15 c 20 12 c 25

< 21 c 16 e 18

< 16

< 14

< 25

< 27 c 19

< 15

< 18 c 21

< 24

< 18 c 16 c 22

< 25

< 20

< 20 c 25 23 c 12

< 22

< 14

< 18

< 31

< 23

< 36 c 25

< 21 c 39 c 17 c 31

< 31

< 25 c 14 c 13 c 17

< 19 c 19

< 19

< 18 20 c 18 c 19

< 16

< 18

< 15 c 13 c 15 c 20

< 12

< 24

< 20

< 16 c 17 e 16

< 14 c 23

< 27 c 19

< 15

< 18

< 20 e 24

< 17 c 16

< 22

< 25

< 20

< 25

< 22 c 12

< 21 e 14 c 26

< 23

< 36

< 24

< 21

< 39

< 17 c 30

< 30

< 21 c 35 (1 1 c 12 c 14

< 15

< 13

< 22 c 23

< 15 c 18

< 22 I 9

< 15 c 17

< 14 c 15

< 17

<.I9

< 21 c 22

< 21

< 17

< 19

< 24

< 22

< 17 c 20 e 20

< 18 26 c 22 23 c 26 c 18

< 18

< 17

< 22

< 24

< 15 c 21 c 11 26 23, (1)

< 28 c 29

< 23

< 19

< 36

< 13 c 34

< 21 c 19

< 20 20 f 12 20 f 12 20 f 10 c 13 c 17

< 18

< 19 c 18 c 19 c 18

< 21

< 15

< 18 c 16

< 13

< 16 c 20 e 13 c 25

< 21 c 16 e 18

' c 16

< 14

< 23 c 27

< 19

< 15 c 18 c 21 c 24

< 18

< 17 c 22

< 26

< 21

< 20 e 26

< 23 c 12 c 22

< 15

< 28

< 17 c 23

< 37 e 25

< 22

< 39 c 17 c 31

< 31 c 22

< 25 20 f 11

< 12

< 14 e 16 c 43

< 22

< 23 c 15

< 18

< 20

< 19 c 15

< 17 c 14

< 15

< 23 c 17 c 19

.= 20 22

< 20

< 17

< 19

< 24 22

< 17 20

< 20

< 17

< 26

< 22 23 c 25

< 17

< 17 e 21

< 24 e 14 c 20

< 14 c 26 c 28

< 29

< 12

< 18 c 36

< 13

< 34 c 21

< 19

< 20 (1) 20 f 10

< 12

< 14

< 16 c 13 e 22 c 23

< 15 19 c 20

< 18 c 15

< 16

< 13

< 15

< 23

< 16

.= 34 c 19

< 22

< 20 c 17

.z. 19

< 25 22 c 16 c 19

< 19 c 17

< 25

< 21

< 22

< 25

< 16

< 17 c 16

< 21 c 11

< 20

< 14 c 25

< 31 c 27 c 28

< 22

< 18

< 35

< 6

< 33

< 20

< 19 4 20 160 (1) 22 f 41 (1) SEE THE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-14

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllKG WET f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-1 31 CS-I 34 CS-1 37 Ba-I 40 La-140 35 Cabbage 35 Collards 35 Kale 35

?

A Cabbage 01 35 Collards 35 Kale 35 Cabbage 08/24/05

< 12 18 f 3 08/24/05

< 11 14 f 3 08/24/05 c 16 20 f 4 0912 1/05 c 16 16 f 2 09/2 1 /05 c 15 20 f 2 09/21 105

< 16 16 f 2 1011 7/05 c 19 9 & 2 3290 f 418 3040 f 383 3690 f 223 3540 f 566 2630 f 485 3680 f 584 2810 f 620

< 22 c 12 c 15 e 23

< 13 19 f 14

< 16 c 9 20 f 11 c 47

< 25 31

< 47

< 23

< 28 4 42

< 21 c 27

< 58 e 22

< 31

< 78

< 21 c 69

< 25 c 45 c 12

< 120

< 21

< 109

< 39

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-1 31 CS-1 34 CS-1 37 Ba-I 40 La-1 40 PERIOD 35 10/17/05 e 12 18 f 2 2980 f 400

< 47

< 17

< 25 c 108 c 28 Cola rds 35 1011 7/05

< 22 18 f 3 4110 f 574

< 44 c 16 e 26

< 99 c 37-Kale MEAN*

15 f 7 16 f 7 3308 f 967 38 f 29 18 f 11 25 f 11 93 f 49 29 f 25

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATlONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllKG WET f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECT I0 N S r-8 9 Sr-90 K-40 1-1 31 cs-134 cs-137 Ba-140 La-l 40 PERIOD 36 Cabbage 36 Collards 36 Kale 36

?

3 Cabbage

-4 36 Collards 36 Kale 36 Cabbage 08/24/05 08/24/05 08/24/05 0912 1 /05 0912 1 /05 09/2 1 105 10/17/05

< 19 20 f 4 3460 f 356 c 30

< 15

< 14 c 76

< 22

< 21

< 8

< 21

< 19

< 15 c 19

< 21

< 18

< 19 32 f 3 4710 f 406 c 17

< 9

< 10

< 20 -

7

2 2300 f 435 c 57 c 20 c 20 36 f 5 5610 f 174 c 10 32 f 5 6520 f 584 c 23 4

1 2370 f 325

< 23 39 i 3 4250 f 360

< 23 c 30 c 68

< 77

< 61 c 60

< 10

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VIf.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATlON SAMPLES COLLECTED tN THE VICINITY Of OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCVKG WET f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-1 31 cs-134 cs-I 37 Ba-140 La-I 40 PERIOD 36 1011 7/05

< 24 13 f 3 4090 f 507 e 59 c 23

< 25 c 131 c 26 Collards 36 1011 7105

< 23 22 f 3 4370

510

< 55

< 18

< 2 2 c 110 c 23 Kale MEAN*

20 f 5 23 f 26 4187 f 2755 33 f 37 14 f 1 1 16 f 12 84 f 74 21 It 20

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllKG WET f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-1 31 CS-1 34 cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 66 Cabbage 66 Collards 66 Cabbage 66 Co Ila rds 66 Kale 9

2 a

66 Cabbage 08/24/05 08/24/05 09/2 1 105 09/2 1 105 0912 1 105 10/17/05 MEAN*

< 14

< 16

< 14

< 20

< 18

< 23 t7 f 7 7 f 3 2970 f 276

< 16 6 i 1 3660 f 545

< 51 10 f 2 4370 f 582

< 53 10 f 2 4870 f 854

< 47 10 f 3 3220 f 224

< 14

< 7

< 10

< 23

< 28

< 20

< 3 2570 f 369

< 50

< 20 8 f 6 3610 i 7746 39 f 37 18 f 16

< 10 20 f 11

< 38

< 12 c 32

< 35

< 37 c 22 26 f 20

< 45

< 13

< 141

< 43

< 159

< 34

< 133

< 30

< 130

< 47 108 f 105 30 f 30

-+

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-VIII.l QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATION STATION, 2005 STATION RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGENISTD. QUARTER 2 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC f 2 S. D.

C 14 1

T1 3

4 5

6 8

9 11 22 46 47 48 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59, 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 71 72 73 74 75 78 79 81 82 I

84 85 86 88 89 90 92 98 99 I

11.4 f 2.6 12.9 f 1.7 11.5 f 3.2 iI I

11.7 f 2.2 10.4 f 1.7 11.0 f 2.5 14.5 f 5.1 10.9 f 2.5 11.1 f 2.2 11.0 f 1.5 11.0 f 2.2 10.6 f 3.3 10.0 f 2.2 11.7 f 2.8 11.3'f 1.9 13.3 f 2.8 14.0 f 2.2 14.0 e 2.0 10.9 f 1.5 18.0 -I-3.1 14.7 f 1.8 12.7 f 1.6 11.8 f 1.8 12.6 f 3.7 11.4 f 0.1 12.2 f 0.6 12.4 f 2.5 12.4 f 2.4 11.9' f 4.4 10.2 & 2.3 9.9 f 2.4 11.5 f 1.2 11.2 f 1.1 10.5 f 3.4 9.9 f 3.9 11.6 k 2.4 12.0 f 3.9 12.1 f 1.3 10.7 f 2.3 11.6 f 2.5 11.7 2.6 10.3 f 2.4 11.6 k 2.1 9.5 f 2.7 10.2 f 2.6 10.0 f 1.8 11.3 f. 2.1 10.1 f 2.5 10.3 f 2.5 11.4 f 1.0 12.9 f 0.9 11.1 f 1.1 11.1 f 0.7 10.4 f 1.2 15.6 f 1.0 11.6 f 0.9 11.2 f 1.0 11.4 f 0.6 11.1 f 1.3 10.1 f 0.6 17.3 f 0.5 11.8 f 1.2 13.1 f 0.8 14.2 f 0.7 14.2 f 1.4 11.2 f 2.1 18.6 f 3.6 14.7 f 1.2 12.8 f 2.0 11.7 f 1.2 12.2 f 1.1 11.4 f 0.9 12.3 f 1.5 12.8 f 2.7 11.0 f 1.5 10.4 f 1.6 13.2 f 2.0 (1 1 10.4 f 0.9 10.5 f 0.9 11.7 f 0.9 11.2 f 0.4 10.6 f 1.7 11.0 f 0.8 12.0 1 1.0 13.1 f 0.8 12.3 f 1.0 11.3 f 0.9 11.8 f 0.6 12.1 f 1.1 10.5 f 0.9 11.8 f 0.6 9.8 f 7.3 10.5 f 1.4 10.4 f 0.6 11.3 1 1.0 10.6 f 1.1 10.8 f 0.8 9.8 f 0.9 11.9 f 1.7 10.1 f 1.3 11.2 f 0.9 9.3 f 1.8 9.5 f 1.3 (1 1 9.4 f 2.7 9.7 f 0.9 10.1 f 1.2 9.5 f 1.0 8.7 f 1.1 8.5 f 0,6 10.1 f 1.2 10.1 f 1.6 11.7 f 1.5 12.5 f 1.1 12.6 f'2.8 9.8 f 1.1 15.7 f 1.0 13.5 f 0.8 11.7 f 1.5 10.9 f 1.3 10.8 f 1.4 11.4 1 2.4 11.9 f 3.3 10.6 f 1.5 10.7 f 1.6 10.3 f 2.4 8.6 f 0.4 8.1 f 1.3 11.0 f 1.6 10.5 f 2.8 8.3 f 0.6 7.6 f 1.9 9.9 f 1.1 9.1 f 0.7 11.2 f 1.6 9.4 f 0.7 9.8 f 1.4 9.9 f 0.6 8.6 f 2.1 10.1 f 0.9 7.6 f 0.6 8.4 f 1.0 8.7 f 0.9 10.0 f 3.9 8.4 f 1.3 8.3 i 0.9 11.4 f 1.0 12.9 f 0.9 11.1 f j.1 11.1 f 0.7 10.4 f 1.2 12.6 f 5.8 11.6 f 1.2 11.6 f 0.9 11.2 f 1.0 11.4 f 0.6 11.1 f 1.3 10.4 f 1.6 11.1 f 1.5 13.4 f 4.4 11.0 f 1.9 13.1 f 0.8 14.2 f 0.7 I

14.2 f 1.4 11.2 f 2.1 18.6 f 3.6 14.7 f 1.2 42.8 f 2.0 11.7 f 1.2 12.2 f 1.1 11.4 f 0.9 12.3 f 1.5 12.8 f 2.7 13.2 f 2.0 (11 10.4 f 0.9 10.5 f 0.9 11.7 f 0.9 11.2 k 0.4 10.6 f 1.7 11.0 f 0.8 12.0 f 1.0 13.1 f 0.8 12.3 f 1.0 11.3 f 0.9 11.8 f 0.6 12.1 f 1.1 10.5 f 0.9 11.8 f 0.6 9.8 i 1.3 10.5 f 1.4 10.4 f 0.6 10.6 f 1.1 11.3 f 1.0 10.8 f 0.8 12.9 f 1.4 14.0 f 1.7 13.8 f 2.3 13.3 f 1.0 11.4 f 1.4 11.0 f 1.1 16.4 f 3.1 (1 1 12.3 f 1.4 (1 )

12.2 f 0.7 12.7 f 2.9 10.4 f 1.3 12.2 f 1.2 12.3 f 0.7 15.1 f 0.6 15.2 f 1.1 11.4 f 0.9 15.0 f 3.2 19.2 f 3.2 15.7 f 2.1 13.7 f 0.7 12.7 f 0.8 15.2 f 7.1 11.5 f 1.4 12.5 f 0.4 13.4 1 2.1 12.7 f 1.1 13.4 f 3.7 11.4 f 1.1 10.4 f 1.1 12.4 f 1.3 11.9 f 0.9 12.5 f 1.3 (1 1 12.7 f 0.8 12.7 f 1.5 12.8 k 1.2 12.1 f 1.9 12.8 f 2.6 12.9 f 1.2 12.6 f 1.6 11.5 f 0.9 10.8 f 1.9 11.4 f 1.1 10.7 f 1.7 11.0 f 1.6 11.1 f 0.8 12.6 f 1.8 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION c-20

TABLE C-Vlll.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, MIDDLE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 1

RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN PER STD. QUARTER f 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA CONTROL I

STATION I.

SITE BOUNDARY MIDDLE SPECIAL INTEREST I

1 JAN-MAR 12.9 f 4.0 11.5 f 2.5 11.1 f 1.6 12.2 f 2.1 APR-J UN 11.4 f 3.3 9.2 f 2.0 9.5 f 2.0

/ '

10.9 f 3.0 JUL-SEP 12.9 f 4.0 11.4 f 1.8 11.1 f 1.5 12.2 f 2.1 OCT-DEC 13.9 f 4.0

,12.3 f 2.8 11.9 f 1.8 13.5 f 1.4 I

TABLE C-V111.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATtNG STATION, 2005 I

I RESULTS IN UNITS OF MlLLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER I

LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM f 2 s.d.

SITE BOUNDARY 62 8.6 19.2 12.8 f 4.2 I

MIDDLE DISTANCE 62 7.6 16.4 11.1 f 3.2 SPECIAL INTEREST 58 7.6 13.3 10.9 f 2.4 CONTROL 8

9.8 14.0 12.2 f 2.6 I

SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - A, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 I f I,

I INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE STATIONS - 4, 5, 22, 47,48, 68, 73, 74, 75, 79, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, 99 SPECIAL INTEREST - 3,6, 8, 9, 11,46, 71, 72,78, 81, 88, 89,90, 92, T1 CONTROL STATIONS - C, 14 I,

I c-2 1

TABLE C-IX.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 I

SURFACE WATER (TRITIUM LlQUl D SCl NTl LLATl ON)

COLLECTt ON PERIOD 23 24 33 94 JAN 01/04/05 01/04/05 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 02/01 105 03/02/05 05/03/05 06/01 105 07/06/05 09/07/05 10/03/05 10/03/05 10/05/05 11/02/05 12/07/05 04/26/05 04/25/05 04/05/05 b

I 08/03/05 02/01 /05 03/02/05 0410 5/0 5 05/03/05 06/01 /05 07/06/05 08/03/05 0 9/07/0 5 10/05/05 1 1 /02/05 12/07/05 SURFACE WATER (GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY1 COLLECTION PERIOD 23 24 33 94 '

JAN 01 /04/05 01/04/05 I

FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 02/01 /05 03/02/05 04/26/05 04/25/05 04/05/05 05/03/05 06/01 105 07/06/05 09/07/05 10/03/05 10103105 10105105 11/02/05 12/07/05 08/03/05 02/01 105 04/05/05 05/03/05 0610 1 /05 07/06/05 09/07/05 10/05/05 1 1 /02/05 12/07/05 03/02/05 08/03/05 WELL WATER (TRITIUM & GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY)

COLLECTION PERIOD 1

37 38 JAN-MAR 01/21/05 - 03/17/05 01/12/05 - 03/15/05 01/04/05 - 03/15/05 APR-J U N 04/05/05 - 06/24/05 04/12/05 - 06/15/05 04/12/05 - 06/15/05 JUL-SEP 07/26/05 - 09/27/05 07/19/05 - 09/13/05 07/26/05 - 09/27/05 OCT-DEC 10/26/05 - 12/13/05 10/12/05 - 12/13/05 10/11/05 - 12/13/05 AIR PARTICULATE (GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY)

COLLECTION C

3 20 66 PERIOD JAN-MAR 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 APR-JUN 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 JUL-SEP 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 OCT-DEC 09/27/05 - 12/28/05 09/27/05 - 12/28/05 09/27/05 - t2/28/05 09/27/05 - 12/28/05 COLLECTION 71 72 73 PERIOD JAN-MAR 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 12/29/04 - 03/29/05 APR-JUN 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 03/29/05 - 06/29/05 JUL-SEP 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 06/29/05 - 09/27/05 OCT-DEC 09/27/05 - 12/28/05 09/27/05 - 12/28/05 09/27/05 - 12/28/05 c-22

TAPLE C-IX.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 I

AIR PARTICULATE (GROSS BETA 8 1-1 31)

COLLECTION C

3 20 66 71 PE Ril 0 D I

I 1

12/29/04 - 01/04/05 12/29/04 - 01/U4/05 12/29/04 - 01fl4105

, 12/29/04 - 01/04/05 12/ZY/U4 - OI~lb4/US 2

3 4

I 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 01/04/05 - 01/12/05 01/12/05 - 01/18/05 01/18/05 - 01/25/05 01/25/05 - 02/01/05 02/01/05 - 02/08/05 02/08/05 - 02/15/05 02/15/05 - 02/22/05 02/22/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/08/05 03/08/05 - 03/15/05 03/15/05 - 03/22/05 03/22/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 04/05/05 04/05/05 - 04/12/05 04/12/05 - 04/19/05 04/19/05 - 04/26/05 04/26/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 05/10/05 05110105 - 05/18/05 05/18/05 - 05/24/05 05/24/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/07/05 06/07/05 - 06/15/05 06/15/05 - 06/21/05 06/21/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 07/07/05 07/07/05 - 07/13/05 07/13/05 - 07/19/05 07/19/05 - 07/26/05 07/26/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/10/05 08/10/05 - 08/16/05 08/16/05 - 08/23/05 08/23/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/07/05 09/07/05 - 09/13/05 09/13/05 - 09/21/05 09/21/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 10/05/05 10/05/05 - 10/12/05 10/12/05 - 10/19/05 10/19/05 - 10/26/05 10/26/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/08/05 11/08/05 - 11/16/05 11/16/05 - 11/22/05 11/22/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/07/05 12/07/05 - 12/13/05 12/13/05 - 12/20/05 12/20/05 - 12/28/05 01/04/05 - 01/12/05 01/12/05 - 01/18/05 01/18/05 - 01/25/05 01/25/05 - 02/01/05 02/01/05 - 02/08/05 02/08/05 - 02/15/05 02/15/05 - 02/22/05 02/22/05 4- 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/08/05 03/08/05 - 03/15/05 03/15/05 - 03/22/05 03/22/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 04/05/05 04/05/05 - 04/12/05 04/12/05 - 04/19/05 04/19/05 - 04/26/05 04/26/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 05/10/05 05/10/05 - 05/18/05 05/18/05 - 05/24/05 05/24/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/07/05 06/07/05 - 06/15/05 06/15/05 - 06/21/05 06/21/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 07/07/05 07/07/05 - 07/13/05 07/13/05 - 07/19/05 07/19/05 - 07/26/05 07/26/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/10/05 08/10/05 - 08/16/05 08/16/05 - 08/23/05 08/23/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/07/05 09/07/05 - 09/13/05 09/13/05 - 09/21/05 09/21/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 10/05/05 10/05/05 - 10/12/05 10/12/05 - 10/19/05 10/19/05 - 10/26/05 10/26/05 - 71/02/05 11/02/05 - 11 /08/05 11/08/05 - 11/16/05 11/16/05 - 11/22/05 11/22/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/07/05 12/07/05 - 12/13/05 12/13/05 - 12/20/05 12/20/05 - 12/28/05 01/04/05 - 01/12/05 01/12/05 - 01/18/05 01/18/05 - 01/25/05 01/25/05 - 02/01/05 02/01/05 - 02/08/05 02/08/05 - 02/15/05 02/15/05 - 02/22/05 02/22/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/08/05 03/08/05 - 03/15/05 03/15/05 - 03/22/05 03/22/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 04/05/05 04/05/05 - 04/12/05 04/12/05 - 04/19/05 04/19/05 - 04/26/05 04/26/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 05/10/05 05/10/05 - 05/18/05 05/19/05 - 05/24/05 05/24/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/07/05 06/07/05 - 06/15/05 0611 5/05 - 06/21 105' 06/21/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 07/07/05 07/07/05 - 07/13/05 07/13/05 - 07/19/05 07/19/05 - 07/26/05 07/26/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/10/05 08/10/05 - 08/16/05 08/16/05 - 08/23/05 08/23/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/07/05 09/07/05 - 09/13/05 09/13/05 - 09/21/05 09/21/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 10/05/05 10/05/05 - 10/12/05 10/12/05 - 10/19/05 10/19/05 - 10/26/05 10/26/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/08/05 '

11/08/05 - 11/16/05 11/16/05 - 11/22/05 11/22/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/07/05 12/07/05 - 12/13/05 12/13/05 - 12/20/05 12/20/05 - 12/28/05 01/04/05 - 01/12/05 01/12/05 - 01/18/05 01/1 8/05 - 01/25/05 01/25/05 - 02/01/05 W'/01/05 - 02/08/05 02/08/05 - 02/15/05 02/15/05 - 02/22/05 02/22/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/08/05 03/08/05 - 03/15/05 03/15/05 - 03/22/05 '

03/22/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 04/05/05 04/05/05 - 04/12/05 04/12/05 - 04/19/05 04/19/05 - 04/26/05 04/26/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 05/10/05 05/10/05 - 05/18/05 05/18/05 - 05/24/05 05/24/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/07/05 06/07/05 - 06/15/05 06/15/05 - 06/21/05 06/21/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 07/07/05 07/07/05 - 07/13/05 07/13/05 - 07/19/05 07/19/05 - 07/26/05 07/26/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/10/05 08/10/05 - 08/16/05 08/16/05 - 08/23/05 08/23/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/07/05 09/07/05 - 09/13/05 09/13/05 - 09/21/05 09/21/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 10/05/05 10/05/05 - 10/12/05 10/12/05 - 10/19/05 10/19/05 - 10/26/05 10/26/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/08/05 11/08/05 - 11/16/05 11/16/05 - 11/22/05 11/22/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/07/05 12/07/05 - 12/13/05 12/13/05 - 12/20/05 12/20/05 - 12/28/05 01/04/05 - 01/12/05 01/12/05 - 01/18/05 01/18/05 - 01/25/05 01/25/05 - 02/01/05 02/01/05 - 02/08/05 02/08/05 - 02/15/05 02/15/05 - 02/22/05 02/22/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/08/05 03/08/05 - 03/15/05 03/15/05 - 03/22/05 03/22/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 04/05/05 04/05/05 - 04/12/05 04/12/05 - 04/19/05 04/19/05 - 04/26/05 04/26/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 05/10/05 05/10/05 - 05/18/05 05/18/05 - 05/24/05 05/24/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/07/05 06/07/05 - 06/15/05 06/15/05 - 06/21/05 06/21/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 07/07/05 07/07/05 - 07/13/05 07/13/05 - 07/19/05 07/19/05 - 07/26/05 07/26/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/10/05 08/10/05 - 08/16/05 08/16/05 - 08/23/05 08/23/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/07/05 09/07/05 - 09/13/05 09/13/05 - 09/21/05 09/21/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 10/05/05 10/05/05 - 10/12/05 10/18/05 - 10/19/05 10/19/05 - t0/26/05 10/26/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/08/05 11/08/05 - 11/16/05 71/16/05 - 11/22/05 11/22/05 - 11/30/05 11/30/05 - 12/07/05 12/07/05 - 12/13/05 12/13/05 12/20/05 12/20/05 - 12/28/05 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-23

TABLE C-IX.l 1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 AIR PARTICULATE (GROSS BETA & 1-131)

CO L L ECTlO N 72 73 PERIOD 1 2 / 2 m - 01/04/05 12/29/04 - Ul/U4/0S 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 4

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 I

48 49 50 51 52 01/04/05 - 01/12/05 01/12/05 - 01/1$/05 t 01/18/05 - 01/25/05 01/25/05 - 02/01/05 02/01/05 - 02/08/05 02/08/05 - 02/15/05 '

02/15/05 - 02/22/05 02/22/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/08/05 03/08/05 - 03/15/05 03/15/05 - 03/22/05 03/22/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 04/05/05 04/05/05 - 04/12/05.

04/12/05 - 04/19/05 04/19/05 - 04/26/05 04/26/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 05/10/05 05/10/05 - 05/18/05 05/18/05 - 05/24/05 05/24/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/07/05 06/07/05 - 06/15/05 06/15/05 - 06/21/05 06/21/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 07/07/05 07/07/05 - 07/13/05 07/13/05 - 07/19/05 07/19/05 - 07/26/05 07/26/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/10/05 08/10/05 - 08/16/05 08/16/05 - 08/23/05 08/23/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/07/05 09/07/05 - 09/13/05 09/13/05 - 09/21 /05 09/21/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 10/05/05 10/05/05 - 10/12/05 10/12/05 - 10/19/05 10/19/05 - 10/26/05 10/26/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/08/05 11/08/05 - 11/16/05 11/16/05 - 11/22/05 1 1/22/05 - I 1/30/05 1 1/30/05 - 12/07/05 12/07/05 - 12/13/05 12/13/05 - 12/20/05 12/20/05 - 12/28/05 01/04/05 - 01/12/05 01/12/05 - 01/18/05 01/18/05 - 01/25/05 01/25/05 - 02/01/05 02/01/05 - 02/08/05 02/08/05 - 02/15/05 02/15/05 - 02/22/05 02/22/05 - 03/02/05 03/02/05 - 03/08/05 03/08/05 - 03/15/05 03/15/05 - 03/22/05 03/22/05 - 03/29/05 03/29/05 - 04/05/05 04/05/05 - 04/12/05 04/12/05 - 04/19/05 04/19/05 - 04/26/05 04/26/05 - 05/03/05 05/03/05 - 05/10/05 05/10/05 - 05/18/05 05/18/05 - 05/24/05 05/24/05 - 06/01/05 06/01/05 - 06/07/05 06/07/05 - 06/15/05 06/15/05 - 06/21/05 06/21/05 - 06/29/05 06/29/05 - 07/07/05 07/07/05 - 07/13/05 07/13/05 - 07/19/05 07/19/05 - 07/26/05 07/26/05 - 08/03/05 08/03/05 - 08/10/05 08/10/05 - 08/16/05 08/16/05 - 08/23/05 08/23/05 - 08/30/05 08/30/05 - 09/07/05 09/07/05 - 09/13/05 09/13/05 - 09/21/05 09/21/05 - 09/27/05 09/27/05 - 10/05/05 10/05/05 - 10/12/05 10/12/05 - 10/19/05 10/19/05 - 10/26/05 10/26/05 - 11/02/05 11/02/05 - 11/08/05 11/08/05 - 11/16/05 11/16/05 - 11/22/05 1 1/22/05 - 1 1/30/05 1 4/30/05 - 12/07/05 12/07/05 - 12/13/05 12/13/05 - 12/20/05 12/20/05 - 12/28/05 C-24

FIGURE C-1 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN CLAMS OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1983 - 2005

.I..

,

I c

+INDICATOR STATION I

+BACKGROUND STATION YEAR

I I

obt v w 0

a 0

Irr 0

m m

m N

0 0

m 0

N m

PO02 6661 9661 661 1661 6861 6861 8861 L861 9861 9861 S861 P86T P861 0

0 0

m U

0

I I

I I 0

0 w

0 h

d 0

0 t-3 6661 9667 f 6 6 7 1667 6861 6861 8861 L86T 9867 9861 S86 I P86 I P86 I

FIGURE C-4 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 0 INDICATOR 4.00E-02 3.00E-02 2.00E-02 1.00E-02 0.0 OE+O 0 n

n v) 0 0 x 4

23 v) 0 0 r s

VJ 0

0 2 x

vr 0

0 2 rl

\\

vi v) 0 0 r s

vr 0

0 x s m

m m

0 0

r l Date

FIGURE C-5 MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CR%EK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2005 sw Q, a 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00 I YEAR

Data from Cookstown station ONLY after December 1996

t Q) a FIGURI3 C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 I

n

. I - -. - -

I 0 TO 2 MILES 2 TO 5 MILES DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT OVER 5 MILES

I I

sooz PO02 002 L661 9661 S66T P661 661 2661 1661 0667 I

I I 6 8 6 1 I

I I

0 0

N t

0 0

m vi 1

In 0

I I

I '

APPENDIX D DATA TABLES QC LABORATORY

The following section contains data illustrating the analyses performed by the quality control laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE). Duplicate samples were obtained from sGveral locations and media and split between the primary laboratory, Environmental Inc. (Env) anal TBE. Comparison of the results for most media were within expected ranges.

I I

I 4,

I i J I

D - I

I I

Intentionally Left Blank D - 2

TABLE D-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 I

RESULTS 1N UNITS OF PCllLlTER f 2 SIGMA I

COLLECTION 24 QCA QCB PERIOD I

I,

I 04/25/05 c 192 c 175 c 141 10/03/05

< 174

< 191 c 177 MEAN*

183 f 25 183 f 23 159 f 51 I

I I

I J

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITtVE VALUES D-3

x TABLE D-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllLlTER f 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 211-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 CS-1 34 CS-1 37 Ba-140 La-1 40 PERIOD 24 04/25/05

< 4 c 4

< 10-

< 5

< 10

< 4

- < 8

< 4

< 22 c 7 -

10103/05

< 4

< 6 c 12 c 5

< 10

< 5

< 9

< 4

< 5

< 38

< 12 MEAN*

4 k O 5

3 1 1

3 5 k O 1 0 k O 5 + 1 8 k 1 4 k O 4

f l

3 O f 2 3 1 0 + 7 MEAN' 3 + 5 3 4 5 7

1 2 3 f 4 6 k 1 1 3. r - 5 5 + 9 3 + 4 3 4 4 20 2 42 6 f 11 MEAN*

4 + 8 6 + 7 1 1 2 1 7 6

6 9 5 7 6 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 6 f 9 3 + 3 2 0 + 2 9 3 5 4

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

I I

TABLE D-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 I

RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCVLITER f 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 1

QCA QCB

, PERIOD 1

01/21/05 - 03/17/05

< 197

< 196

< 143 04/05/05 - 06/24/05

< 163 c 165

< 162 07/26/05 - 09/27/05

< 181

< 779

< 177 10/26/05 - 12/13/05 c 157

.Z 158

< 162 I

MEAN*

175 f 36 175 f 34 161 f 28 I

1 '

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES D-5

TABLE D-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS UF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATlNG STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCVLITER +_ 2 SIGMA Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-I 40 La-140 STC COLLECTION Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 PERIOD I

01/21 - 03/17/05

< 4

< 5 c 10-

< 6

< 9

< 5

- < 9

< 5

< 24

< 9 04/05 - 06/24/05 c 5

< 6 c 14 5

< I 1 9

c 11

< 6

< 48

< 14 07/26 - 09/27/05 c 6

< 6

< 14

< 7

< 1 4

< 6

< 12

< 5

< 6

< 50

< 14 10126 - 12/13/05 4

< 3

< 7

< 3

< 6

< 4

< 5 3

+4

=

< 19

< 5 MEAN*

4.6 f 2.2 5.0 f 2.5 11 f 7.0 5.2 f 2.8 10 f 6.3 6.0 f 4.3 9.0 f 5.7 4.7 f 2.4 5.1-k 2.4

- 35 f 32 11 f 8.8 QCA 01/21 - 03/17/05 c 5 5

< 7 4

8 e 5 8

4

< 4 C 25

< 9 04/05 - 06/24/05

< 5

< 5 c 10 c 7 8

< 5

< 8

< 3

< 4

< 28

< 6 07/26 - 09/27/05

< 4

< 5

-=9

< 4 c 10 5

< 9 C 4

< 4

< 49 c 16 10/26 - 12/13/05

< 4

< 5 C 8

< 4

< 9

< 5

< 7

< 4

< 4 c 21 C 9 MEAN 4.6 f 1.1 4.8 f 0.5 8.7 f 2.2 4.9 f 3.4 9 f 1.8 5.0 f 0.6 8.1 f 1.5 3.6 f 1.3 3.9 f 0.3 31 f 26 9.6 f 8.8 QCB 01/21 - 03/17/05

< 4

< 3

< 8

< 4

< 4 c 4 6

3

< 4 c 11

< 2 04/05 - 06/24/05

< 4

< 12

< 4 5

5

< 7

< 4

< 44

< 10 07/26 - 09/27/05

< 5

< 12

< 3 5

< 4

< s c 4 c 4

< 32

< 7 10/26 - 12/13/05 4

< 4

< 9 3

6

< 4

< 9

< 4

< 2

< 30 c 11 x

MEAN*

4.4 f 0.4 4.1 f 2.0 10 f 4.2 3.6 f 0.9 5.2 f 1.7 4.2 f 1.0 6.6 f 3.5 3.6 k 1.0 3.6 f 1.9 29 f 27 7.3 f 7.8 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE D-lll.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINlTY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCVKG WET k 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 CO-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 cs-I 34 cs-1 37 24 04/25/05 1250 f 721 e 40

< 42

< 90 c 35 c 73

< 48

< 46 PERIOD QCA 04/25/05 1670 f 533 QCB 04/25/05 1591 f 332 c 40

< 21 c 39

< 20 c 54 e 25

< 33

< 70

< 17

< 12

< 37

< 15

< 37 c 20

TABLE D-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllKG DRY k 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 CO-58 CO-60 cs-134 CS-1 37 Ra-226 Th-232 PERIOD 24 04/25/05 c 363 709 f 411-

< 35

.z 33

< 26 c 30

< 32

-= 959 246 f 131 10/03/05 c 352 I990 f 534

< 37

-= 40 40 30 42 804 f 693 246 f 107 MEAN*

358 f 16 1350 f 1812 36 f 3 37 f 10 33 f 20 30 f 0 37 f 75 4382 f 219 246 f 0 QCA 04/25/05

< 266 674 f 374

< 28 c 28 c 28

.= 27 i

31 c 734 219 f 93 10/03/05

< 433 1830 f 600

< 39

< 39 48

.C 41 41 e 1050 c 232 MEAN*

350 f 236 1252 f 1635 34 f 15 33 f 16 38 f 27 34 f 20 36 f 14 892 f 447 226 f 173 QCB 04/25/05 c 112 940 f 210

< 14 c 15

< 11 c 15

< 12 c 790 NA 10/03/05

< 386 3605 f 568 c 19 c 41 c 24 c 15 c 25

< 448 NA MEAN*

249 f 388 2272 f 3770 17 f 7 28 f 35 17 f 18 15 f 1 19 f 18 623 f 496

$3 co THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE D-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATlON SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2005 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCllKG WET & 2 SIGMA La-140 Ba-140 STC COLLECTION Sr-89 S r-90 K-40 1-13?

cs-134 cs-137 36 CABBAGE SEPTEMBER

< 15 4

1 2370 325 PERIOD COLLARDS SEPTEMBER

< 21 KALE SEPTEMBER c 19 MEAN*

18 f 6 QCA CABBAGE SEPTEMBER e 13 COLLARDS SEPTEMBER

< 20 KALE SEPTEMBER

< 18 MEAN*

17 f 6 a

QCB CABBAGE SEPTEMBER

< 2 COLLARDS SEPTEMBER

< 5 KALE SEPTEMBER

< 11

?

MEAN*

6 f 9 39

3 32 f 3 25 f 37 5 f 1 31 f 3 38 f 3 25 f 36 e l 5 f 2 9 f 3 5

7 4250 360 4710 406 3777 f 2479 2220 f 352 3870 f 397 5040 f 437 3710 f 2834 2052 f 289 4656 f 417 4701 f 424 3803 f 3033

< 23

< 17 21

7 c 27

< 20 c 24 23 f 7

< 19

< 18 18 18 f 2

< 12

< 9 t i

4

< 15

< 11 c 12 13 f 3

< 17

< 12 c 14 14 f 5

< 14

< 13

< 10 12 f 5 c 17

< 12 e 1 5 15 f 5

< 14

< 13

< 11

.13 f 3

< 77

< 61

< 60 66 f I 9

< 74

< 57 c 65 65 f 17 c 33 e 46

< 56 45 f 23

< 19 c 18

< 10 16 f 9 e 25 x 13

< 22 20 f 13

< 8

~6

< 7 7 a 3

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVlATlON VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

I APPENDIX E INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON I

PROGRAM

TASLE E-I ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2005 (PAGE 1 OF 3)

I Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

MonthNear Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

March 2005 E4522-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 96.9 107 0.91 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 16.9 17.9 0.94 A

E4523-396 Nl'ilk '

1-1 31 F

Cr-51 Ce-141 CS-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 CO-60 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCVL pCi/L pCi/L pC ill.

pC i/L pCi/L 82.7 21 7 314 123 125 110 158 118 191 140 92.3 229 334 139 130 115 160 111 198 144 0.90 0.95 0.94 0.89 0.96 0.96 0.99 1.06 0.96 0.97 A

A A

A E4525-396 AP Ce-I41 Cr-5 I cs-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 CO-60 pCi8 pCi pC i pC i pC i pCi pCi pCi pCi 150 278 105' 95.6 84.4 112 92.8 162 I02 172 250 1 04 97.1 86.3 120 83.2 148 108 0.87 1.11 1.01 0.98 0.98 0.93 1.12 1.09 0.94 I

E4524-396 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 67.4 60.7 1.11 A

June 2005 E4630-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 89.4 88.1 1.01 A

Sr-90 pC i/L 11.6 11.4 1.02 A

E4631-396 Milk 1-1 31 Ce-141 Cr-51 CS-I 34 CS-I 37 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 CO-60 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L 82.3 91.6 278 81.I 180 124 61.I 156 136 86.9 92.4 303 95.0 189 125 63.9 155 145 0.95 0.99 0.92 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.96 1. O l 0.94 E4633-396 AP Ce-I41 Cr-St CS-I 34 CS-I 37 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 CO-60 pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi 79.2 263 69.7 135 94.9 48 120 1 04 64.2 21 0 66.1 131 87.0 44.4 7 08 101 1.23 1.25 1.05 1.03 1.09 I

.09 1.11 1.03 W

w A

A A

A E4632-396 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 88.9 92.5 0.96 A

E-1

TABLE E-I ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2005 I

1 (PAGE 2 OF 3)

I Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Mont hNear Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

September 2005 E4766-396 Milk Sr-89 I

Sr-90 I

I I

E4767-396 Milk 1-1 31 Ce-I 4 1 C r-5 1 cs-I 34 CS-?37 CO-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 I

CO-60 E4769-396 AP Ce-I 41 Cr-5 1 cs-I 34 cs-I 37 CO-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 CO-60 E4768-396 Charcoal 1-1 31 December 2005 E4766-396 Milk 3-89 I

Sr-90 I

I I

E4767-396 Milk 1-1 31 Ce-141 0 - 5 1 cs-I 34 cs-I 37 CO-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 CO-60 E4633-396 AP Ce-I 41 Cr-51 cs-1 34 CS-I 37 CO-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 C 0-6 O

pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi/L pCilL pCi/L pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCi/L pCilL pCilL pCilL pCilL pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi pCi E-2 135.0 146.0 9.7

'I15 87.5 203 279 102 178 55.3 59.9 120 146 193 267 166 53.7 81.6 59.6 107 133 63.9 114 11.6 79.6 202 185 74.9 177 73.9 152 97.5 161 102 22 1 195 68.4 194 77.4 171 94.2 173 109 81.a 78.4 94.3 235

$38 122.0 195 63.4 92.0 61.O 123 167 169 246 88.8 142 46.0 66.8 44.3 89.6 122 64.2 128 10.3 74.6 224 193 87.3 189 77.5 152 82.4 I 154 111 201 173 78.3 170 69.4 137 73.9 138 99.1 0.92 0.84 0.93 0.87 0.83 0.84 0.91 0.87 0.89 0.98 I

0.98 0.87 1.I4 1.09 0.88 1.I7 1.17 1.22 1.35 1.19 1.09 1.oo 0.89 1.13 1.07 0.90 0.96 0.86 0.94 0.95 1.oo I

.I8 1.05 0.92 1.10 1.13 0.87 1.14 1.I2 1.25 1.27 1.25 1-10 A

A A

W N (1)

A A

W W

W A

TABLE E-I ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2005 (PAGE 3 OF 3)

I Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

M ont hNear N urn ber Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

TBElAnalytics Evaluation (d)

December 2005 E4632-396 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 73.3 73.3 1.oo A

I (I) New technician - AP not counted in petri dish resulted in high Fe-59 activity. Counting in petri dish, the Fe-59 would have been (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 700% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluation based on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning. Reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 120-7.30. N = Not Acceptable. Reported resulf falls outside the ratio limits of c 0.70 and > 7.30.

acceptable as evidenced by the 4Q05 AP recount data. NCR 06-01 E-3

TABLE E-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2005 I

(PAGE 1 OF I)

I Identification Reported Known M on thNear N urn ber Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

Control Limits Evaluation (c)

May 200,5 Rad 61 I

Rad 61 November 2005 Rad 63 I

Rad 63 Water Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-I 33 cs-I 34 CS-1 37 CO-60 Zn-65 G rrA Gr-B I H-3 Water 1-1 31 Water Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-I 33 cs-1 34 cs-I 37 CO-60 Zn-65 G r-A Gr-B H-3 Water 1-1 31 pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCilL pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L p c i/L p c i/L pC i/L pCilL pCilL pCi/L pCilL pCilL pCi/L pCi/L 37.5 411.3 5.37

' I 5.92 88.6 88.4 70.5 78.6 37.5 37.0 122 118 35.5 37.0 35.6 34.2 24600 24400 20 1 204 13.6 15.5 18.0 19.0 16.6 16.0 31.7 31.2 30.8 33.9 26.8 28.3 83.9 84.1 109 I

105 19.5 23.3 34.0 39.1 12400 12200 17.8 17.4 32.6 - 50.0 0.00 - 14.6 73.1 - 104 69.9 - 87.3 184 - 218 28.3 - 45.7 97.6 -11 38 21.O - 53.0 25.5 - 42.9 20200 - 28600 10.3 - 20.7 10.3 - 27.7 7.37 - 24.7 22.5 - 39.9 25.2 - 42.6 19.6 - 37.0 75.4 - 92.8 86.8 - 123 13.2 - 33.4 30.4 - 47.8 10100 - 14300 12.2 - 22.6 A

A A

A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The ERA known value is equal to 700% of the parameterpresent in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or (c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

outside of the Control Limits. CE =check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.

E-4

TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2005 I

(PAGE 1 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Mon t hNea r N u m be r Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

Range Evaluation (c)

April 2005 I

April 2005 October 2005 05-Maw1 3 Water Mas1 3 Soi I I

GrW13 RdFl3 GrF13 RdVl3 I1 Ir I

Water AP AP cs-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-57 CO-60 H-3 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 cs-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-57 CO-60 Mn-54 Zn-65 G r-A Gr-B K-40 CS-1 34 cs-1 37 CO-57 CO-60 Mn-54 3-90 Zn-65 Gr-A Gr-B Vegetation Cs-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-57 CO-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 05-Maw1 4 Water cs-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-57 CO-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 H-3 Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L 108 305 21 5 241 2 83 314,

0.093 509 Bq/L 655 Bq/t 31 0 Bq/L 234 Bq/L 21 9 Bq/L 512 Bq/L 642 BqiL 890 Bq/L,

0.601 Bq/L 1.54' Bqjsample 3.26 Bq/sample 2.05 Bqlsample 4.78 Bq/sample 3.02 Bq/sample 3.31 Bq/sample 1.15 Bq/sample 3.14 Bq/sample 0.0764 Bqkample 0.305 Bq/kg 5.45 Bq/kg 13.4 Bq/kg 1.49 Bq/kg 4.80 Bq/kg 3.67 Bq/kg 6.45 Bq/kg 7.71 Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L Bq/L 142 302 251 243 547 383 8.75 324 127 332 227 251 280 33 1 496 759 31 5 242 212 604 81 0 0.525 1.67 3.51 2.26 4.92 3.03 3.33 1.35 3.14 0.232 0.297 485 5

4.1 9.88 3.15 5.18 1.65 6.29 167 333 272 26 1 527 418 8.98 330 88.90 - 165.10 232.40 - 461 -60 158.90 - 295.1 0 175.70 - 326.30 196.00 - 364.00 231.70 - 430.30 no range given (I) 347.20 - 644.80 531.30 - 986.70 220.50 - 409.50 169.40 - 314.60 148.40 - 275.60 339.50 - 630.50 422.80 - 785.20 567.00 - 1053

>O.O - 1.05 0.84 - 2.51 2.46 - 4.56 1.58 - 2.94 3.44 - 6.40 2.12 - 3.94 2.33.. 4.33 0.95 - 1.76 2.20 - 4.08

>O.O - 0.46 0.15 - 0.45 3.50 - 6.50 2.88 - 5.34 6.92 - 12.84 2.21 -4.10 3.63 - 6.73 I

.I6 - 2.15 4.40 - 8.18 116.90 - 217.10 233.1 0 - 432.90 190.40 - 353.60 182.70 - 339.30 368.90 - 685.1 0 292.60 - 543.40 6.29 67 231.OO - 429.00 A

A A

E-5

TABLE E-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

I TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2005 (PAGE 2 OF 2) 0 Identification Reported Known Acceptance MonthNear Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b)

Range Evaluation (c)

October, 2005 MaS14 Soil cs-I 34 I

CS-I 37 CO-57 CO-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 1

K-40 Bq/L Bq/L BqlL Bq/L BqlL Bq/L Bq/L BqlL 494 446 '

506 289 460 626 57 1 889 568 439 524 2 87 439 604 757 823 397.60 - 738.40 307.30 - 570.70 366.80 - 681.20 200.90 - 373.10 307.30 -570.70 422.80 - 785.20 529.90 -1984.10 576.10 - 1070 GrW14 Water G r-A Gr-B October2005 RdF14 AP CS-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-57 I

CO-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 I

I I

GrF14 AP G r-A Gr-B RdVl3 Vegetation Cs-I 34 CS-I 37 CO-57 CO-60 Mn-54 Sr-90 Zn-65 Bq/L 0.858 Bq/L 1.22 Bqlsample

4. I 1 8qlsample 3.16 Bqlsample 6.14 Bq/sample 2.86 Bq/sample 4.54 Bqlsample 2.12 Bq/sample 4.28 Bqlsample Bqlsam ple 0.79 1.35 3.85 3.23 6.2 2.85 4.37 2.25 4.33 0.304 0.482 0.858 0.827 4.35 4.09 5.99 5.4 17.0 13.30 4.87 4.43 7.40 6.57 2.03 2.42 11.8 10.2 0.21 - 1.38 0.85 - 1.92 2.70 - 5.01 2.26 - 4.20 4.34 - 8.06 2.00 - 3.71 3.06 - 5.68 1.58 - 2.93 3.03 - 5.63 20.0 - 0.80 0.55 - I

.22 2.86 - 5.32 3.80 - 7.06 9.31 - 17.29 3.10 - 5.76 4.60 - 8.54 1.69 - 3.15 7.14 - 13.26 (1) The Sr-90 in water was a MAPEP false positive test. The TBE reported result of 0 093 2 0 0908 Bq/L was the forced Sr-90 activity and uncerfainty, as required by MAPEP. The MDC for the sample was 0.145 pCi/L.

(2) NCR 05-18 asigned to investigate low bras /n Sr-90 in soil - pending fusion procedure development.

(a) Teiedyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravrmetnc and/or (c) DOE/MAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptablre with warning, N=not acceptable.

volumetric measurements made dunng standard preparation.

E-6 A

A A

A W

A A

TABLEE-4 4

ERA'^) STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2005 (Page 1 of 2)

Concentration (pCi/L)

LabCode Date Analysis Laboratory ERA Control Result" Result" Limits Acceptance STW-1 05 1 STW-1 05 1 STW-1052 STW-1052 STW-1052 STW-1052 STW-1052 STW-1053 STW-1053 STW-1054 STW-1054 SW-1054 STW-1055 STW-I 055 STW-I 056 STW-1056 STW-1056 STW-1056, STW-I 056

' STW-1057 STW-I057 STW-I 058 STW-1059 STW-I 059 STW-I059 STW-I 060 STW-1067 STW-I067 STW-1068 STW-1068 STW-1068 STW-I 068 STW-I 068 STW-1069 STW-I 069 STW-1070 STW-AO70 STW-I070 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 02/15/05 05/17/05 05/17/05 05/17/05 05/17/05 091 7/05 0511 7/05 05/17/05 0511 7/05 05/17/05 05/17/05 0511 7/05 0511 7/05 0511 7/05 0511 71/05 0811 6/05 08/16/05 08/16/05 08/16/05 08/16/05 08/16/05 08/16/05,

08/16/05 08/16/05 08/16/05 08/16/05 o w 6/05 3-89 Sr-90 Ba-I 33 Co-60 CS-I 34 CS-I 37 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 U ran i u rn Sr-89 Sr-90 Ba-I 33 co-60 CS-1 34 CS-I 37 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 U rani urn H-3 1-1 31 3-89 3-90 Ba-I 33 CO-60 cs-I 34 cs-I 37 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 Uranium 28.0 f 1.2 25.1 f 0.7 52.9 f 2.8 54.4 f 0.4 67.7 f 1.8 39.6 f 1.8 159.7 k 3.0 55.1 k 1.8 46.8 f 1.3 13.7 k 1.5 13.3 f 0.6 5.1 2 0.2 45.1 f 4. 1 7.5

0.9 87.1 f 2.0 75.3 f 0.7 201.0 f 8.4 130.0 f 6.7 42.7.t. 2.9 34.0 f 0.4 14.7 f 0.5 6.6 f 0.1 9.6 2 0.1 38.4 f 0.8 19.3 f 0.7 24100.0 f 109.0 29.1 k 3.0 36.0 f 0.6 107.0 f 1.7 15.2 & 0.2 89.1 f 0.3 72.1 & 1.0 67.4 k 1.4 44.3 f 1.5 58.4 f 2.1 16.6 & 1.5 6.2 f 0.3 4.5 & 0.1 29.4 24.4

' 53.4 56.6 64.9 40.2 161.O 67.9 51.I 14.1 13.7

'5.0 41.3 t5.9 88.4 37.0 78.6 194.0 118.0 37.0 34.2 15.5 7.6 18.9 10.1 24400.0 28.0 33.8 106.0 13.5 92.1 72.7 65.7 55.7 61.3 16.6 6.2 4.5 20.7 - 38.1 15.7 - 33.1 44.2 -62.6 47.9 -65.3 56.2 - 73.6 31.5 - 48.9 133.0 - 189.0 38.5 - 97.3 38.5 - 97.3 10.4 - 17.8 7.8 - 19.6 0.0 - 10.2 32.6 - 50.0 0.0 - 14.6 73.1 - 104.0 28.3 -45.7 69.9 - 87.3 184.0 -218.0 97.6 - 138.0 21.0 - 53.0 25.5 -42.9 10.3 - 20.7 5.6 - 9.5 10.7 - 27.1 4.9 - 15.3 20200.0 - 28600.0 19.3 - 36.7 25.1 -42.5 87.7 - 124.0 4.8 -22.2 83.4 - 101.O 64.0 - 81.4 54.3 - 77.1 31.6 -79.8 44.0 - 78.6 12.3 - 20.9 3.5 - 8.9 0.0 - 9.7 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass

I TAFLE E-4 E RAla) STATISTIC A L S U M MA RY P R 0 F I C I EN CY TE STI N G P RO G RA M EN VI R 0 N M E N TA L, I NC.,200 5 I

(Page 1 of 2) 1 Concentration (DC ilt)

LabCode I

Date Analysis Laboratory ERA I

Con t ro I I

ResultD Result" Limits Acceptance I

I I

STW-I 072 1 1 / I 5/05 STW-1072 I

1 / I 5/05 STW-1073 1 1 / I 5/05 STW-1073 1 1/15/05 STW-1073 11/15/05 STW-1073 11/15/05 STW-1073 1 1 / I 5/05 STW-1074 a 1111 5/05 STW-1074 1 1 / I 5/05 STW-1075 1 1 / I 5/05 STW-1076 1 1/15/05 STW-1076 11/15/05 STW-1076 1111 5/05 STW-1077 1111 5/05 3-89 Sr-90 Ba-I 33 CO-60 cs-734 cs-4 37 21-1-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Ra-226 Ra-228 U ran iu m 1-1 31 H-3 20.6 2 0.4 15.0 i 0.3 31.8 f 1.8 85.0 f 1.4 37.2 f 2.1 i 27.8 f 0.7 109.0 4 I

.o 41.1 f 1.2 42.7 f 0.5 20.5 f 0.6 7.8 f 0.6 5.5 f 0.6 15.5 f 0.3 12500.0 f 238.0 19.0 16.0 31.2 84.1 33.9 28.3 105.0 23.3 39.1 17.4 8.3 3.5 16.1 12200.0 10.3 - 27.7 7.3 -24.7 I 1

22.5 -39.9 75.4 04 25.2 -42.6 19.6 - 37.0 86.8 - 123.0 13.2 - 33.4 30.4 -47.8 12.2 - 22.6 6.2 - 10.5 2.0 - 5.0 10.9 - 21.3 10100.0 - 14300.0 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass a Resutts obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the crosscheck program for proficiency Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratory result is given as the mean f standard deviation for three determinations.

Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits The original samples were calculated using an Am-241 efficiency. The samples were spiked with Th-232. Samples testing in drinking water conducted by Environmental Resources Associates (ERA).

as provided by ERA.

were recounted and calculated using the Th-232 efficiency. Results of the recount: 27.01 f 2.35 pCi/L.

The reported result was the average of the first cycle of 100 minutes, the average of the second cycle counts was 4.01 pCVL Decay of short-lived radium daughters contributed to a higher counting rate. Delay of counting for 100 minutes provided better results.

E -8

TABLE E-5

+

DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEPP ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2005 (Page 1 of 3)

Concentration Known Con t ro I Lab Code' Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits a Acceptance STW-1045 01/01/05 Gr. Alpha 0.45 f 0.10 0.53 0.00 - 1.05 Pass STW-1045 01/01/05 qr. Beta 1.90 f 0.10 1.67 0.84 -2.51 Pass I4 I

STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-I 046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-1046 STW-I 046 01/01/05 Am-241 01 /O 1/05 CO-57 0 1 /O 1/05 CO-60 01/01/05 CS-I34 01/01/05 CS-I37 04/01/05 Fe-55 01/01/05 Mn-54 01/01/05 Ni-63 01/01/05 H-3 01/0?/05 Pu-238 01/01/05 Pu-239140 0 1 /O 1/05 3-90 0 1 /O 1 105 0 1 /O 1 /05 01/01/05 U-238 TC-99 U -23 3/4 01 101 105 Zn-65 1.62 k 0.12 248.70 f 1.00 328.50 k 1.70 239.40 11.20 115.50 f 1.80 64.90 f 7.00 304.00 f 9.70 334.80 k 1.90 7.10 f 1.60 0.01 f 0.02 2.50 f 0.14 0.70 f 0.80 43.20 f 1.40 3.31 f 0.20 3.38 f 0.20 538.40 f 3.80 1.72 227.00 251.OO 127.00 332.00 75.90 280.00 331.OO 9.00 0.02 0.00 42.90 3.24 3.33 496.00 2.40 1.20 - 2.24 158.90 - 295.1 0 175.70 - 326.30 88.90 - 165.1 0 232.40 - 431.60 53.13 - 98.67 196.00 - 364.00 231.70 - 430.30 0.00 -20.00 0.00 - 1.00 1.68 -3.12 0.00

5.00 30.03 - 55.77 2.27 -4.21 2.33 -4.33 347.20 - 644.80 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass STVE-1047 01/01/05 CO-57 10.60 f 0.20 9.88 6.92 - 12.84 Pass SWE-I 047 01 101 /05 CO-60 3.00 f 0.20 3.15 2.21 -4.10 Pass STVE-I 047 01/01 105 CS-I 34 4.80 f 0.40 5.00 3.50 -6.50 Pass STVE-1047 01/0IL/05 CS-I37 4.10 f 0.30 4-1 I 2.88 - 5.34 Pass STVE-1047 01/01/05 Mn-54 5.10 f 0.30 5.18 3.63 -6.73 Pass STVE-I 047 01 /01/05 Zn-65 6.20 f 0.50 6.29 4.40 - 8.18 Pass STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-A 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 STSO-I 048 01 /01/05 0 1 /O 1 /05 0 1 /01/05 01 /01/05 01 /O 1 /05 01 101 105 01/01/05 01/01/05 '

01 /01/05 0 1 /O 1/05 0 I

/01/05 01 /O 1/05 0 1 /O 1 /O 5 01 101 /05 Am-241 CO-57 CO-60 cs-I 34 Cs-137 K-40 Mn-54 Ni-63 Pu-238 P u -2 39/4 0 Sr-90 U -233/4 U-238 Zn-65 STAP-1050 01/01/05 Gr. Alpha STAP-1050 01/01/05 Gr. Beta 96.60 f 10.00 264.00 f2.00 226.50 f2.20 760.60 f 3.70 336.20 f 3.60 663.70 f 18.00 541.30 k 3.90 924.30 f 17.20 0.60 f 0.80 78.00 f4.80 514.60 4 18.70 47.90 k4.00 851.30 k 7.30 226.30 f8.60 0.11 f 0.03 0.38 f 0.05 109.00 242.00 212.00 759.00 31 5.00 604.00 485.00 1220.00 0.48 89.50 640.00 62.50 249.00 810.00 0.23 0.30 76.30 - 141.70 169.40 - 314.60 148.40 - 275.60 531.30 - 986.70 220.50 - 409.50 422.80 - 785.20 339.50 - 630.50 854.00 - 1586.00 0.00 - 1.00 62.65 - 116.35 448.00 - 832.00 43.75 - 81.25 174.30 - 323.70 567.00 - 7053.00 0.00 - 0.46 0.1 5 - 0.45 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass E-9

TABLE E-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP$

ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2005 (Page 2 of 3)

I 1

Concentration I

Known,

Control Lab Code" Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits a Acceptance STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STAP-I 049 STAP-I 049 STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STAP-1049 STW-106 1 STW-1 06 1 STW-1061 STW-1061 STW-1 06 1 STW-1 06 1 STW-1061 STW-I 061 STW-I061 STW-I 06 1 STW-1067 STW-106'l STW-1067 STW-1061 STW-1061 STW-1061 STW-1062 STW-1062 STSO-4 063 '

STSO-? 063 STSO-? 063 STSO-1 063 STSO-f 063 STSO-1 063 STSO-I 063 STSO-? 063 STSO-1 063 STSO-I 063 STSO-I 063 STSO-I 063 STSO-I 063 STSO-I 063 01/01/05 Am-241 01/01/05 CO-57 01/01/05 CO-60 01/01/05 CS-I34 01/01/05 CS-I37 01/01/05 Mn-54 01 /01/05 Pu-238 0 I

/O 1 /05 Pu-2 39/40 01/01/05 Sr-90 01/01/05 U-233/4 01/01/05 U-238 01 /O 1 /05 Zn-65 07/01/05 Am-241 07/01 105 CO-57 07/01 105 CO-60 07/01/05 CS-134 07/01 105 CS-I 37 07/01 105 Fe-55 07/01/05 Mn-54 0710 1 105 N i-63 07/01/05 H-3 07/01/05 Pu-238 07/0 1 /05 Pu-239140 07/01 105 Sr-90 07/01 105 TC-99 07/01/05 U-23314 07/01/05 U-238 07/0 1/05 Zn-65 07/01/05 Gr. Alpha 07/01/05 Gr. Beta 07/0 1 105 Am-24 1 07/01 105 CO-57 07/0 I

/05 CO-60 07/01/05 CS-I34 07/01/05 CS-I 37 07/01/05 K-40 07/01/05 Mn-54 07/01/05 Ni-63 07/01/05 Pu-238 07/01/05 P~-239/40 07/01/05 Sr-90 07/01/05 U-233/4 07/01 105 U-238 07/0 1 /05 Zn.65 0.10 f 0.04 4.76 k 0.64 2.84 2 0.22 3.54 -t- 0.37 2.20 & 0.27 3.15 -t 0.21 0.16 2 0.04 0.17 f 0.02 2.24 kO.34 0.34 f 0.02 0.35 f 0.02 3.12 f 0.15 293.20 f 7.30 2.21 f 0.13 275.70 f 1.30 171.80 f 4.00 342.10 f 2.20 167.80 f 9.30 514.20 f 12.60 437.00 f 2,50 105.10 f 3.60 1.64 f 0.A2 2.32 f 0.13 9.20 f 1.30 72.30 f 2.30 4.11 k 0.18 4.14 f 0.18 364.60 ? 4.90 0.57 f 0.05 1.36 2 0.05 48.40 f 3.90 608.30 2 2.80 322.70 f 2.40 632.10 k 5.20 512.40 14.20 720.50 f 19.00 516.80 f 5.10 366.50 4 13.30 68.80 f 15.00 0.00 f 0.00 602.90 f 17.20 61 50 f 1.OO 164.50 f 16.70 874.70 f 8.40 0.10 4.92 3.03 3.51 2.26 3.33 0.20 0.17 1.35 0.34 0.35 3.14 2.23 272.00 261.00.

167.00 333.00

'I 196.00 527.00 41 8.00 100.00 1.91 2.75 8.98 66.50 4.10 4.26 330.00 0.79 1.35 81.10 524.00 287.00 568.00 439.00 604.00 439.00 445.00 60.80 0.00 757.00 52.50 168.00 823.00 1 0.07 - 0.13 3.44 - 6.40 2.12 -3.94,

I 2.46 -4.56 1.58 - 2.94 2.33 -4.33 0.14 - 0.25 0.14 - 0.25 0.95 - 1.76 0.24 - 0.44 0.25 - 0.46 2.20 -4.08 1.56 - 2.90 190.40 - 353.60 182.70 - 339.30 116.90 - 217.10 233.1 0 - 432.90 137.20 - 254.80 368.90 - 685.10 292.60 - 543.40 70.00 - 130.00 1.34 - 2.48 1.93 - 3.58 6.29 - 11.67 46.55 - 86.45 2.87 - 5.33, 2.98 -5.54 231.OO - 429.00 0.21 - 1.38 0.85 - 1.92 56.77 - 105.43 366.80 - 681.20 200.90 - 373.1 0 397.60 - 738.40 307.30 - 570.70 422.80 - 785.20 307.30 - 570.70 31 1.50 - 578.50 42.56 - 79.04 0.00 - 0.00 529.90 - 984.10 36.75 -68.25 1 17.60 - 21 8.40 576.10 - 1070.00 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Fail Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass E-I 0

TABLE E-5 4

DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEPP ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2005 (Page 3 of 3)

Concentration Known Control Lab Code" Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits Acceptance STVE-I 064 07/01/05 Am-241 0.18 f 0.03 0.23 0.16 - 0.30 Pass STVE-1064 07/01/05 Cp-57 15.90 f 0.20 13.30 9.31 - 17.29 Pass STVE-I064 07/01/05 CO-60 I 4.80 f 0.10 4.43' 3.10 - 5.76 Pass STVE-1064 07/01 105 CS-I 34 4.60 f 0.20 4.09 2.86 - 5.32 Pass STVE-I 064 07/01 /05 CS-I 37 5.90 f 0.30 5.43 3.80 - 7.06 Pass STVE-1064 07/0 1/05 Mn-54 7.20.t- 0.20 6.57 4.60 - 8.54 Pass STVE-I 064 07/01 /05 PU-238 0.04 f 0.02 0.00 0.00 - 1.00 Pass (I

I STVE-1064 STVE-I 064 STVE-I 064 STVE-I 064 STVE-1064 STAP-1065 STAP-1065 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 1 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 STAP-1066 07/0 1 /05 07/0 1 /05 07/0 1 /05 0710 1/05 07/0 1 /05 07/0 1/05 07/0 1/05 07/0 I

/05 0710 1/05 07/0 1/05 07/0 1 /05 0710 1/05 07/0 1 /05 0710 1/05 07/0 1/05 07/01/05 07/0 1/05 0710 I

/05 07/0 1/05 P u -2 39/4 0

S r-90 U-23314 U-238 Zn-65 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta Am-241 CO-57 CO-60 CS-I 34 CS-I 37 Mn-54 PU-238 Pu-239/40 Sr-90 U-23314 U-238 Zn-65 0.13 f 0.02 0.28 2 0.03 11.00 f 0.50 2.80 f 0.30 0.33 f 0.04 0.30 f 0.04 0.97 f 0.06 0.14 f 0-03 5.81 f 0.17 2.79 f 0.14 3.67 f 0.12 2.93 k 0.23 4.11 f 0.26 0.11 f 0.02 0.10 f 0.01 2.25 & 029 0.28 f 0.02 0.28.I- 0.02 4.11 f 0-26 0.16 2.42 0.33 0.35 10.20 0.48 0.83 0.16 6.20 2.85 3.85 3.23 4.37 O.?O 0.09 2.25 0.27 0.28 4.33 0.1 1 - 0.21 1.69 - 3.15 0.23 - 0.43 0.24 - 0.45 7.14 - 13.26 0.00 - 0.80 0.55 - 1.22 0.1 1 - 0.21 4.34 - 8.06 2.00 - 3.71 2.70 - 5.01 2.26 -4.20 3.06 - 5.68 0.07 -0.13 0.06 - 0.12 1.58 - 2.93 0.1 9 - 0.35 0.20 - 0.37 3.06 - 5.68 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass a Results obtained by Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participant in the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operations office, Idaho Falls, Idaho Results are reported in units of Bqlkg (soil), BqlL (water) or Bqltotal sample (filters, vegetation) as requested by the Department of Energy.

Laboratory codes as follows: STW (water), STAP (air filter), STSO (soil), STVE (vegetation).

MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratory precision (1 sigma, I determination)

The strontium carbonate precipitates were redissolved and processed. The average of the three analyses was 1.34 pCilL, and control limits as defined by the MAPEP.

although the recovery was only 30%. The result of a new analysis was 1.56 pCilL.

' Incorrect sample weight used in calculation. Result of recalculation: 97.0 f 7.8 Bqlkg.

E-I I

Person / Time
ML061220343
Site:	Oyster Creek (DPR-016)
Issue date:	05/01/2006
From:	Rausch T AmerGen Energy Co, Exelon Corp
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2120-062-2961, 2130-06-20329
Download: ML061220343 (101)
v • d • e

ML061220343

Text

Subject:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search