|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22041B1072022-02-10010 February 2022 LTR-22-0033-1 Oedo Tom Gurdziel, E-mail Event Number 55734 at Davis Besse, a Matter of Interpretation ML20177A4932020-06-25025 June 2020 Enclosure a - Redacted Owners, Officers, Directors, and Executive Personnel Forms for Energy Harbor Corp., Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp., and Energy Harbor Nuclear Generation LLC ML20008D2232020-01-0808 January 2020 NRC Region I Twitter Feeds 10-1 to 12-31-2019 L-16-092, Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 4 of 62016-04-22022 April 2016 Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 4 of 6 ML16132A3962016-04-22022 April 2016 Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 5 of 6 ML16132A3942016-04-22022 April 2016 Davis-Besse, and Perry - Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 3 of 6 ML16132A3932016-04-22022 April 2016 Davis-Besse, and Perry - Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 2 of 6 ML15231A3642015-05-27027 May 2015 FOIA/PA-2014-0204 - Resp 1 - Final, Group a ML12167A0622012-07-16016 July 2012 Enclosure - Davis-Besse 17RFO SG Tube Inspection Tables ML12170B1042012-06-18018 June 2012 0772 - G105 - Conducting Inspections - Workshop #4 Scenario ML12170B1052012-06-18018 June 2012 0772 - G105 - Conducting Inspections - Workshop #5 Scenario ML12200A1832012-06-12012 June 2012 Unit Licensing Basis Seismic Ground Motion Concern ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012 Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status ML11348A0432011-12-12012 December 2011 Email -- Davis-Besse SB Crack Rc Investigation RFI ML12213A3532011-11-15015 November 2011 Shield Building Laminar Cracking ML12213A3512011-11-10010 November 2011 Containment Shield Building Issue ML12200A1952011-11-0707 November 2011 Shield Building Issue NRC Technical Reviewer Focus Questions ML11301A2392011-10-31031 October 2011 Reference: Wind Resource Estimates Developed by Aws Truepower LLC for Windnavigator ML11301A2352011-10-31031 October 2011 References: Concentrating Solar Resources of the United States ML1126601882011-09-23023 September 2011 NRC 2011 Davis-Besse L-11-165, Enclosure C - Binder 1 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (DBNPS) References. (Tab a 8 Through T 30)2011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 1 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (DBNPS) References. (Tab a 8 Through T 30) ML11193A1332011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 2 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (Dbnps) References. (Tab H 1 Through Tab H 16) ML11193A1042011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 2 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (Dbnps) References. (Tab H 17 to Tab C 2) ML11227A1962011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 1 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (Dbnps) References. (Tab Am 1 Through a 7) ML11109A0842011-04-15015 April 2011 Attachments B-D, to L-11-107, Reply to Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1, License Renewal Application ML1016006942010-06-10010 June 2010 G20100238/EDATS: OEDO-2010-0305 - Ltr. Tom Gurdziel, 2.206 - Firstenergy - Davis-Besse - T. Gurdziel Questions ML1017301232010-06-0909 June 2010 Green Ticket Tritium Releases ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010 List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML0933507512010-01-14014 January 2010 Temporary Instruction 2515/180, Managing Fatigue ML0906500232009-03-0606 March 2009 Safety Culture Policy Statement (Safety & Security) Comments ML0904800182009-02-17017 February 2009 Public Comments Regarding the Safety Culture Policy Statement ML0906404392009-01-28028 January 2009 Enclosure 5: Case Study 1: Structure of TS for Ultrasonic Flow Meters - Meeting Summary of the January 27 & 28 Meeting with Nrc/Tstf ML0829101252008-11-20020 November 2008 ITSB R-Relocated Specifications - to Davis Besse Amendment Beyond Scope Issues ML0829007802008-11-20020 November 2008 ITSB L-Less Restrictive Changes - Attachment to Davis-Besse Amendment Beyond Scope Issues ML0829006832008-11-20020 November 2008 Table A-DOC Attachment - Administrative Changes - to Davis-Besse Amend. ITS with Beyond Scope Issues ML0829006302008-11-20020 November 2008 List of Acronyms to Davis-Besse Amend. Re; ITS with Beyond Scope Issues ML0829101122008-11-20020 November 2008 ITSB M - More Restrictive Changes - to Davis Besse Amendment Beyond Scope Issues ML0824902712008-10-0202 October 2008 List of Acronyms to Davis Besse Draft Amend. ITS Conversion L-08-241, Attachment 1, Applicable Portions of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS) Improved. Technical Specification (ITS) Conversion Website, Section 3.5 RAIs2008-08-26026 August 2008 Attachment 1, Applicable Portions of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS) Improved. Technical Specification (ITS) Conversion Website, Section 3.5 RAIs ML0803600792008-02-0101 February 2008 Attachment 1- DBNPS Steam Generator Inspections Data ML0802800442008-01-25025 January 2008 Special Inspection Evaluation, Basis for Investigatory Response Decision for a Significant Operational Power Reactor Event ML0732400242007-10-25025 October 2007 Examples of Max Thermal Power License Conditions ML0726301142007-09-14014 September 2007 / P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 9208 for the Model No. 10-142B Package (TAC L24117)/S121170 ML0726303192007-09-14014 September 2007 P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 6574 for the Model No. 3-82B Package (TAC L24116)/ Register User List ML0733801902007-06-27027 June 2007 Meeting Attendees, 6/27/07, Meeting with Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company Regarding May 14, 2007, Demand for Information ML0634705992006-12-14014 December 2006 Plant Service List ML0535402852005-12-16016 December 2005 Issuance of Conforming Amendments for Bv, Units 1 and 2; Perry, Unit 1 and Davis-Besse, Unit 1 Transfer of Ownership Interests to Fengenco - Amendment 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-79 ML0530704422005-11-0808 November 2005 Proposal to Clean Incore Tunnel and Below Vessel - a Locked High Radiation Area ML0531302012005-04-21021 April 2005 Timeline for Enforcement Actions ML0423002112004-08-0505 August 2004 Submittal of Independent Assessment Plan for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Operations Performance, Revision 2 2022-02-10
[Table view] |
Text
Objectives of the NRCs Reactor Operating Experience Program The following objectives are critical to the agencys reactor OpE program:
OpE is collected, evaluated, communicated, and applied to support the agency goal of ensuring safety.
This objective is the primary focus of the agencys reactor OpE program. To accomplish this objective, the agency will have an effective, coordinated program to systematically collect and evaluate OpE, identify and resolve safety issues in a timely manner, and apply lessons learned from OpE to support the agency goal of ensuring safety. The agency will share OpE information with the nuclear industry in a timely manner so the industry can ensure safety.
OpE is used to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, and realism of NRC decisions.
Evaluations of OpE provide fundamental information necessary to improve safety assessments and the realism of NRC decisions. Lessons learned from OpE evaluations will be used to improve NRC regulatory programs, including licensing and inspection.
The public, Congress, and other external stakeholders are provided with accurate, timely, and balanced information regarding operational experience, including actual or potential hazards to health and safety.
Timely sharing of OpE information with the public, Congress, and other external stakeholders will enhance their understanding of the performance of licensed plants.
Attachment 2
Attributes of the NRCs Reactor Operating Experience Program To accomplish the objectives of a reactor OpE program, the following attributes are necessary for the program to be effective:
- 1. Clearly defined and communicated roles and responsibilities.
Management expectations are clearly articulated and communicated and organizational roles and responsibilities clearly defined. Organizational responsibilities include collection, screening, evaluation, corrective action, and followup activities.
Responsibilities for internal and external coordination and communications are also clearly defined, including the interfaces between the organizations reviewing OpE and the inspection, licensing, and research organizations. A single point of contact is established to provide overall coordination for responsibilities distributed throughout the agency.
- 2. Efficient collection, storage, and retrieval of OpE.
Sources of OpE for collection, storage, and retrieval are identified. These sources include OpE from industry and foreign sources, as well as agency-generated information. The sources of OpE are sufficiently comprehensive and of sufficient quality to meet specific user needs and the collection and storage minimize duplication by multiple organizations. Data systems provide user-friendly retrieval capabilities for a wide range of users.
- 3. Effective screening of OpE for followup evaluation.
OpE is promptly screened for followup using appropriate criteria and thresholds to determine whether the OpE is, or could be, risk significant; has, or could have, generic implications; or is, or could be, important from a public confidence perspective. Priority is assigned for evaluation commensurate with the overall significance of the OpE.
- 4. Timely communication of OpE to stakeholders for information or evaluation.
OpE is communicated to stakeholders in a timely manner for information or evaluation. The communication clearly and concisely identifies the issue of concern and puts its significance in proper perspective.
- 5. Timely and thorough evaluations of OpE to identify trends, recurring events, or significant safety issues for appropriate followup actions.
Timely and thorough evaluations of OpE will involve both short-term and long-term efforts to identify trends, recurring events, or significant safety issues. Timely short-term evaluations are necessary to promptly initiate regulatory actions aimed at resolving immediate safety issues and precluding or correcting similar conditions at other facilities. Long-term evaluations to assess safety performance typically use a broader range of OpE input, including reports on individual events and conditions, performance measures, and retrospective information. Long-term evaluations also identify trends and safety issues and their implications for NRC programs. Evaluations are sufficiently thorough to understand the event or condition, contributing factors, root causes, safety significance, and generic implications. Appropriate internal and external organizations are involved, as necessary, to ensure evaluations are complete and accurate.
- 6. Timely decisions on implementation and appropriate followup resulting from the review of OpE.
Timely decisions and actions are taken in response to short-term and long-term evaluations of OpE. The decisions address the need for externally directed regulatory actions as well as appropriate changes to NRC programs. The OpE program identifies activities or actions necessary to ensure timely implementation and followup in response to a regulatory determination. The OpE program also assesses the effectiveness of regulatory and licensee actions taken in response to a lesson learned from the OpE program.
- 7. Periodic assessments of the OpE program to determine its effectiveness and to identify needed improvements.
Periodic assessment of the OpE program is conducted to determine how effective the agency has been in using OpE to reduce the severity or recurrence rate of industry events. An effectiveness review provides feedback from stakeholders to agency management and recommends corrective actions to address identified deficiencies.