|
---|
Category:- No Document Type Applies
MONTHYEARML22041B1072022-02-10010 February 2022 LTR-22-0033-1 Oedo Tom Gurdziel, E-mail Event Number 55734 at Davis Besse, a Matter of Interpretation ML20177A4932020-06-25025 June 2020 Enclosure a - Redacted Owners, Officers, Directors, and Executive Personnel Forms for Energy Harbor Corp., Energy Harbor Nuclear Corp., and Energy Harbor Nuclear Generation LLC ML20008D2232020-01-0808 January 2020 NRC Region I Twitter Feeds 10-1 to 12-31-2019 L-16-092, Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 4 of 62016-04-22022 April 2016 Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 4 of 6 ML16132A3962016-04-22022 April 2016 Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 5 of 6 ML16132A3942016-04-22022 April 2016 Davis-Besse, and Perry - Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 3 of 6 ML16132A3932016-04-22022 April 2016 Davis-Besse, and Perry - Information Pertaining to Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence. Part 2 of 6 ML15231A3642015-05-27027 May 2015 FOIA/PA-2014-0204 - Resp 1 - Final, Group a ML12167A0622012-07-16016 July 2012 Enclosure - Davis-Besse 17RFO SG Tube Inspection Tables ML12170B1042012-06-18018 June 2012 0772 - G105 - Conducting Inspections - Workshop #4 Scenario ML12170B1052012-06-18018 June 2012 0772 - G105 - Conducting Inspections - Workshop #5 Scenario ML12200A1832012-06-12012 June 2012 Unit Licensing Basis Seismic Ground Motion Concern ML12056A0522012-03-12012 March 2012 Enclosure 6 - List of Power Reactor Licensees and Holders of Construction Permits in Active or Deferred Status ML11348A0432011-12-12012 December 2011 Email -- Davis-Besse SB Crack Rc Investigation RFI ML12213A3532011-11-15015 November 2011 Shield Building Laminar Cracking ML12213A3512011-11-10010 November 2011 Containment Shield Building Issue ML12200A1952011-11-0707 November 2011 Shield Building Issue NRC Technical Reviewer Focus Questions ML11301A2392011-10-31031 October 2011 Reference: Wind Resource Estimates Developed by Aws Truepower LLC for Windnavigator ML11301A2352011-10-31031 October 2011 References: Concentrating Solar Resources of the United States ML1126601882011-09-23023 September 2011 NRC 2011 Davis-Besse L-11-165, Enclosure C - Binder 1 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (DBNPS) References. (Tab a 8 Through T 30)2011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 1 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (DBNPS) References. (Tab a 8 Through T 30) ML11193A1332011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 2 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (Dbnps) References. (Tab H 1 Through Tab H 16) ML11193A1042011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 2 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (Dbnps) References. (Tab H 17 to Tab C 2) ML11227A1962011-05-27027 May 2011 Enclosure C - Binder 1 of 2, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 (Dbnps) References. (Tab Am 1 Through a 7) ML11109A0842011-04-15015 April 2011 Attachments B-D, to L-11-107, Reply to Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1, License Renewal Application ML1016006942010-06-10010 June 2010 G20100238/EDATS: OEDO-2010-0305 - Ltr. Tom Gurdziel, 2.206 - Firstenergy - Davis-Besse - T. Gurdziel Questions ML1017301232010-06-0909 June 2010 Green Ticket Tritium Releases ML1019304602010-03-25025 March 2010 List of Historical Leaks and Spills at Us Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML0933507512010-01-14014 January 2010 Temporary Instruction 2515/180, Managing Fatigue ML0906500232009-03-0606 March 2009 Safety Culture Policy Statement (Safety & Security) Comments ML0904800182009-02-17017 February 2009 Public Comments Regarding the Safety Culture Policy Statement ML0906404392009-01-28028 January 2009 Enclosure 5: Case Study 1: Structure of TS for Ultrasonic Flow Meters - Meeting Summary of the January 27 & 28 Meeting with Nrc/Tstf ML0829101252008-11-20020 November 2008 ITSB R-Relocated Specifications - to Davis Besse Amendment Beyond Scope Issues ML0829007802008-11-20020 November 2008 ITSB L-Less Restrictive Changes - Attachment to Davis-Besse Amendment Beyond Scope Issues ML0829006832008-11-20020 November 2008 Table A-DOC Attachment - Administrative Changes - to Davis-Besse Amend. ITS with Beyond Scope Issues ML0829006302008-11-20020 November 2008 List of Acronyms to Davis-Besse Amend. Re; ITS with Beyond Scope Issues ML0829101122008-11-20020 November 2008 ITSB M - More Restrictive Changes - to Davis Besse Amendment Beyond Scope Issues ML0824902712008-10-0202 October 2008 List of Acronyms to Davis Besse Draft Amend. ITS Conversion L-08-241, Attachment 1, Applicable Portions of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS) Improved. Technical Specification (ITS) Conversion Website, Section 3.5 RAIs2008-08-26026 August 2008 Attachment 1, Applicable Portions of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station (DBNPS) Improved. Technical Specification (ITS) Conversion Website, Section 3.5 RAIs ML0803600792008-02-0101 February 2008 Attachment 1- DBNPS Steam Generator Inspections Data ML0802800442008-01-25025 January 2008 Special Inspection Evaluation, Basis for Investigatory Response Decision for a Significant Operational Power Reactor Event ML0732400242007-10-25025 October 2007 Examples of Max Thermal Power License Conditions ML0726301142007-09-14014 September 2007 / P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 9208 for the Model No. 10-142B Package (TAC L24117)/S121170 ML0726303192007-09-14014 September 2007 P. Paquin Ltr Amendment to Certificate of Compliance No. 6574 for the Model No. 3-82B Package (TAC L24116)/ Register User List ML0733801902007-06-27027 June 2007 Meeting Attendees, 6/27/07, Meeting with Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company Regarding May 14, 2007, Demand for Information ML0634705992006-12-14014 December 2006 Plant Service List ML0535402852005-12-16016 December 2005 Issuance of Conforming Amendments for Bv, Units 1 and 2; Perry, Unit 1 and Davis-Besse, Unit 1 Transfer of Ownership Interests to Fengenco - Amendment 7 to Indemnity Agreement B-79 ML0530704422005-11-0808 November 2005 Proposal to Clean Incore Tunnel and Below Vessel - a Locked High Radiation Area ML0531302012005-04-21021 April 2005 Timeline for Enforcement Actions ML0423002112004-08-0505 August 2004 Submittal of Independent Assessment Plan for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Operations Performance, Revision 2 2022-02-10
[Table view] |
Text
J Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 Licensing Basis Seismic Ground Motion Concern Concern: During original review prior to operation, ACRS Committee believed 0.20g bedrock ground acceleration was more appropriate for Davis-Besse (DB) site than 0.1 5g used for design of structures, systems, and components.
Paragraph 2C.3.4 of DB USAR [Revision 28] indicates Maximum Possible Earthquake (SSE) design acclerograms were derived using 0.15g maximum ground acceleration. DB USAR specifies seismic design based on 0.15g not 0.20g for SSE. OBE seismic response spectra derived from SSE spectra using 0.08g/0.15g ratio.
References:
NUREG-0136; Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit 1; December 1976 Supplement No. 1 to NUREG-0136; Safety Evaluation Report Related to the Operation of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit 1; April 1977 Toledo Edison Letter to NRC dated January 27, 1977;
Subject:
Applicant Position for Using 0.15g SSE Acceleration NRC Letter to Toledo Edison dated January 30, 1977;
Subject:
Guidelines for Applicant Seismic Reanalysis and Evaluation Toledo Edison Letter to NRC dated February 24, 1977;
Subject:
Applicant Summary Report for Basis Using 0.15g SSE Acceleration Toledo Edison Letter to NRC dated March 4, 1980;
Subject:
Application to Facility Operating License [request modification in DB-1 License Condition 2.C.(3) (r)]
NRC Letter to Toledo Edison dated August 27, 1980;
Subject:
Amendment No. 30 [deleted satisfied License Condition 2.C.(3) (r)]
NRC Letter to Toledo Edison dated May 31, 1983;
Subject:
Seismic Reanalysis of Piping and Components [NRR Safety Evaluation attached]
Discussion: During review to determine current design and licensing bases for DB shield building, Supplement No. 1 to NUREG-0136 documented ACRS Committee concern that 0.20g ground acceleration was more appropriate than 0.15g used in design.
The Committee recommended that the staff review in detail the plant systems needed to accomplish safe shutdown of the reactor and continued heat removal for a safe shutdown earthquake acceleration of 0.2g and that Regulatory Guide
(
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 Licensing Basis Seismic Ground Motion Concern 1.60, "Design response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants,"
should be applied at the foundation level of the facility.
Staff agreed with Committee and conditioned the license to require the analysis and evaluation be completed prior to startup following the first regularly scheduled refueling outage.
As indicated in the above references, staff provided reanalysis guidance, license condition was established, license amendment deleted license condition, and NRR issued Safety Evaluation for the reanalysis review.
Of note, the licensee documented the position that 0.15g was appropriate - see above references. However, these letters predate the removal to the license condition and the NRR Safety Evaluation.
Evaluation: Licensee demonstrated adequate design margin for systems evaluated using a 0.20g ground motion and response spectra in accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.60.
Licensee was able to utilize higher piping system damping permitted in Regulatory Guide 1.61 - original licensee calculations used conservative damping.
Systems and components reanalyzed demonstrated adequate design margin for 0.20g ground motion.
Concern: What is the appropriate licensingq basis maximum ground acceleration (SSE) at bedrock, 0.20g per ACRS Committee and licensing condition or 0.15g per Paragraph 2C.3.4 of DB USAR?
Non-conservative design scenario:
- Licensee modifies one of the reanalyzed systems or components
- Using seismic loading based on 0.15g ground motion would not be in accordance with ACRS Committee or prior licensing condition Of note, recent functionality evaluations for shield building laminar indicated additional margin could be captured using higher SSE damping 7% damping for reinforced concrete permitted by current revision of Regulatory Guide 1.61.
- The functionality evaluation based on 0.15g not 0.20g maximum ground acceleration - shield building is anchored to bedrock.
" Will licensee use 7% damping for revised design
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 Licensing Basis Seismic Ground Motion Concern Followup: Requested licensee to provide their licensing position regarding DB seismic licensing basis - 0.15g vs 0.20g horizontal ground motion for maximum possible earthquake.