ML033040293

Meeting Handout Materials for 10/30/03 Stars/Irag/Nrc Meeting to Discuss Topics Taken from the June 10-11, 2003, Workshop

ML033040293
Person / Time
Site:	Palo Verde, South Texas
Issue date:	10/30/2003
From:	Donohew J NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD4
To:
References
Download: ML033040293 (3)

Text

NRC FORM 658 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (9.1999)

TRANSMITTAL OF MEETING HANDOUT MATERIALS FOR IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN This form is to be filled out (typed or hand-printed) by the person who announced the meeting (i.e., the person who issued the meeting notice). The completed form, and the attached copy of meeting handout materials, will be sent to the Document Control Desk on the same day of the meeting; under no circumstances will this be done later than the working day after the meeting.

Do not includeproprietary materials.

DATE OF MEETING The attached document(s), which was/were handed out in this meeting, is/are to be placed 10t30/2003 in the public domain as soon as possible. The minutes of the meeting will be issued in the near future. Following are administrative details regarding this meeting:

Docket Number(s) 50-498, 50-499, 50-528, 50-529, 50-530 Plant/Facility Name Palo Verde and South Texas TAC Number(s) (if available)

Reference Meeting Notice 10/1512003 (ADAMS ML032870296)

Purpose of Meeting (copy from meeting notice) STARS-IRAG/NRC meeting to discuss topics taken from the June 10-11, 2003, workshop.

NAME OF PERSON WHO ISSUED MEETING NOTICE TITLE Jack Donohew Senior Project Manager OFFICE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DIVISION Division of Licensing Project Management BRANCH Project Directorate IV-2 Distribution of this form and attachments:

Docket File/Central File PUBLIC NRC FORM 658 (9-1999) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER This form was designed using InForms

AGENDA - STARS/NRC MEETING OCTOBER 30. 2003

• Introduction

• STARS Items from June 10-11,2003, Workshop*

• NRC Items from June 10-11, 2003, Workshop PUBLIC COMMENT

• License Amendment Process for STARS Common Applications PUBLIC COMMENT

• Conclusion

• The workshop meeting summary was issued July 18, 2003 (ADAMS No. ML031980013).

October 14, 2003 STARS/NRC WORKSHOP FOLLOW-UP ITEMS No. Description Lead Person

1. NRC Request for Additional Information Gramm (RAI) Process: The licensees stated that they wanted to better understand the RAI process followed at the NRC on the approval of information to be requested from licensees.

2. Legal Status of Licensee's E-mail STARS Restriction Footer The NRC staff pointed out that e-mails from licensees to the NRC may have an automatic footer that provides a statement similar to the following: The information contained in this message may be privileged and/or confidential and protected from disclosure. Note that any views or opinions presented In this message are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of

[the licensee]."

3. Current Guidance on Sensitive Unclassified Jaffe Homeland Security Information (SUSHI):

The licensees requested that there be guidance provided to the licensees on the identification and handling of SUSHI.

4. Spent Fuel Project Office (SFPO) Use of Dembek Office Instructions: During discussions, it was noted by the licensees that SFPO does not use the same type of office instructions used by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR).

5. Design Basis Threat (DBT) Order More Donohew Restrictive than Interim Compensatory RIS soon on 'Licensee Changes to Measures (ICMs) in Security Plan Orders: Safeguards and Security Compensatory The licensees stated that there are conflicts Measures Implementation' to provide introduced by the security orders in that the conditions under which licensees may modify language of the later DBT Order may be site-specific actions for implementation.

more restrictive than the earlier lCM Order.

6. Relaxation of Security Plan Orders per Donohew 10 CFR 50.54(p): The licensees suggested that changes should be able to be made to these Orders under 10 CFR 50.54 (p)(2). In that the regulation allows for security plans to be changed without prior Commission approval if the changes do not reduce the effectiveness of the plan.

7. NRC Concerns on Implementation of Donohew Revised 10 CFR 50.59 Rule: STARS-IRAG stated that it thought the NRC staff had concerns about how licensees had implemented and were using the revised rule.