Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014
	ML15117A447
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/27/2015
From:	; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15117A445	List: LR-N15-0081, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014; LR-N15-0081, Hope Creek, and Salem, Units 1 & 2, Submittal of 2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report; ML15117A446;
References
	LR-N15-0081
	Download: ML15117A447 (134)
	v • d • e

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM PSEG Nuclear LLC, SALEM and HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2014 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2014

Intentionally left blank

TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Summary.......................................................................................................................... 1 II. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program..................................................... 4 A. Objectives of the Operational REMP................................................................... 5 B. Implementation of the Objectives........................................................................ 6 I ll. Program Description

....................................................................................................... 7 A. Data Interpretation............................................................................................... 7 B. Program Exceptions............................................................................................ 9 C. Program Changes............................................................................................. 1 0 D. Quality Assurance Program.............................................................................. 1 0 E. Summary of Results: Inter-laboratory Comparison Program

............................ 1 0 F. Summary of Results: Duplicate Sample Comparison Program........................ 1 5 IV. Results and Discussion............................................................................................... 1 7 A. Atmospheric

....................................................................................................... 1 8 1. Air Particulates........................................................................................ 1 8 2. Air Iodine................................................................................................. 20 B. Direct Radiation................................................................................................. 20 C. Terrestrial.......................................................................................................... 22 1. Milk

.......................................................................................................... 23

2. Well Water (Ground Water).................................................................... 24

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water).............................................................. 25

4. Vegetables.............................................................................................. 26

5. Fodder Crops.......................................................................................... 27

6. Soil.......................................................................................................... 28

7. Beef and Game....................................................................................... 29 D. Aquatic

............................................................................................................... 29 1. Surface Water......................................................................................... 30

2. Fish......................................................................................................... 32

3. Blue Crab................................................................................................ 33

4. Sediment................................................................................................. 33 E. Land Use Survey............................................................................................... 35 V. Annotations to Previous AREOR............................................................................ ¥..... 36 VI. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations.. 36 VII. Conclusions................................................................................................................ 36 VIII. References................................................................................................................ 37

- i -

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

Appendix A - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary....................... A-1 Appendix B - Sample Designation and Locations............................................................ B-1 Appendix C - Data Tables............................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D - Summary of Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results from Eckert &

Ziegler Analytics (EZA), Environmental Resource Associates (ERA), and Department of Energy (DOE) Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)............................................................................................................... D-1

- ii -

LIST OF TABLES Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary..................... A-5 Table B-1 Sampling Locations................................................................................. B-3 Table B-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program......................................................... B-7 Table C-1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly Composites of Air Particulates.............................................................................................. C-3 Table C-2 Concentrations of Gross Beta Emitters in Air Particulates....................... C-5 Table C-3 Concentrations of lodine-1 31 in Filtered Air............................................. C-7 Table C-4 Direct Radiation Measurements - Quarterly Dosimetry Results.............. C-9 Table C-5 Concentrations of lodine-131 and Gamma Emitters in Milk..................... C-1 0 Table C-6 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Well Water................................................................................ C-1 2 Table C-7 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water................................... C-1 3 Table C-8 Concentrations of Gross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Water (2F3).................................... C-1 4 Table C-9 Concentrations of lodine-1 31 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable Water (2F3)................................................................... C-1 5 Table C-1 0 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetables.................................. C-1 6 Table C-1 1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fodder Crops.............................. C-1 9 Table C-1 2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Soil.............................................. C-20

- iii-

LIST OF TABLES (cont'd)

Table C-1 3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Beef and Game........................... C-21 Table C-1 4 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water............................................. C-22 Table C-1 5 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water............................. C-23 Table C-1 6 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Edible Fish.................................. C-26 Table C-1 7 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs........................................... C-27 Table C-1 8 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment..................................... C-28 Table C-1 9 Concentrations of Tritium and Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL

.......................................................................................................... C-29 Table D-1 EZA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering.................................................................................. D-3 Table D-2 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering.................................................................................. D-6 Table D-3 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program {MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering................................................................... D-7 Table D-4 EZA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program GEL Laboratories............................................................................................. D-9 Table D-5 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

GEL Laboratories..................................................................................... D-1 1 Table D-6 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program GEL Laboratories............................................................................................. D-1 6 Table D-7 ERA MRAD Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program GEL Laboratories..................................................................................... D-1 8

- iv -

LIST OF MAPS Map 8-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-Site Sampling Locations............ 8-1 2 Map 8-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-Site Sampling Locations............ 8-1 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates-QUARTERLY AVERAGE.......... C-31 Figure 2 Tritium Activity in Surface Water - QUARTERLY AVERAGE................... C-32 Figure 3 Cesium-1 37 & Cobalt-60 Activity in Aquatic Sediment - SEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE................................................................................ C-33 Figure 4 Cesium-1 37 Activity in Soil (Triennial)..................................................... C-34

- v -

r LIST OF ACRONYMS OR TERMS USED IN THIS TEXT (in alphabetical order)

ARE OR Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Percent A

Acceptable a posteriori-The terms a posteriori ("from the later") and a priori ("from the a posteriori earlier") are used to distinguish two types of knowledge, justification, or argument a priori-The terms a priori ("from the earlier") and a posteriori ("from the a priori later") are used to distinguish two types of knowledge, justification, or argument AIO Air Iodine Analyte The substance being identified and measured in a chemical analysis APT Air Particulates BaLa-140 BariumLathanum-140 Be-7 Beryllium-?

Bq Bequerels c

Control Co-57 Colbalt-57 Co-60 Colbalt-60 Cs-134 Ceslum-134 Cs-137 Cesium-137 eves Chemical Volume Control System DOE Department of Energy dpm Disintegrations per minute ECH Crabs ERA Environmental Resource Associates ESF Fish ESS Sediment Eu-152 Europium-152 EZA Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.

Fe-59 Iron-59 FPL Broad Leafy Vegetation FPV Vegetables GAM Game GEL GEL Laboratories Gr-A Gross Alpha Gr-B Gross Beta H-3 Tritium HCGS Hope Creek Generating Station 1-131 lodine-131 r-**

IDM Immersion Dose Monitor ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation K-40 Potassium-40 kg Kilogram L

Liter

-vi-

LLD Lower Limit of Detection LTS Laboratory Testing Services m3 Cubic meter MAPEP Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration mL Milliliter MLK Milk Mn-54 Manganese -54 MilliRoentgen - a unit of radiation, used to measure the exposure of mR somebody or something to X-rays and gamma rays, defined in terms of the ionization effect on air.

Millirem - a unit for measuring amounts of radiation, equal to the effect that mrem one roentgen of X-rays or gamma-rays would produce in a human being. It is used in radiation protection and monitoring.

MWe Megawatt Electric MWt Megawatt Thermal N

Not Acceptable NCR Nonconformance Report NEI Nuclear Energy Institute NELAC National Environmental Laboratory Conference NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ODCM Offsite Dose Calculation Manual pCi Picocuries f--'-------

PE Performance Evaluation 1-----

PSEG Public Service Enterprise Group PT Performance Testing PWR Potable (drinking) Water-Raw PWT Potable (drinking) Water PWT Potable (drinking) Water - Treated QA Quality Assurance Ra-226 Radium-226 REMP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RGPP Radiological Groundwater Protection Program SA Salem SAR Safety Analysis Report SGS Salem Generating Station SOL Soil SOP Standard Operating Procedures Sr-89 Strontium - 89 Sr-90 Strontium - 90 Standard Standard Quarter = 92 days

_Quarter SWA Surface Water TBE Teledyne Brown Engineeri_íg TEDA Triethylene-diamine

- vii -

Th-232 Thorium-232 Thermoluminescent Dosimeter-A TLD measures ionizing radiation TLD exposure by measuring the intensity of visible light emitted from a crystal in the detector when the crystal is heated. The intensity of light emitted is dependent upon the radiation exposure.

TS Technical Specifications uCi Microcuries USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency VGT Fodder Crops w

Warning WWA Ground (well) Water Zn-65 Zinc-65 ZrNb-95 ZirconiumNiobium-95

- viii -

I.

Summary During normal operations of a nuclear power generating station there are permitted releases of small amounts of radioactive material to the environment. To monitor and determine the effects of these releases, a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been established for the PSEG Nuclear LLC, Salem Generating Station (SGS) and Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS). The results of the REMP are published annually, providing a summary and interpretation of the data collected.

Public Service Enterprise Group's (PSEG) Laboratory & Testing Services (L TS) performed the collection of environmental samples during 201 4. TBE performed the analysis of environmental samples during 201 4. Duplicate samples for laboratory quality assurance (QA) were sent to GEL Laboratories. Mirion Technologies provided the dosimetry services.

The REMP is based on NRC guidance as reflected in the SGS's and HCGS's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) with regards to sample media, sampling locations, sampling frequency and analytical sensitivity requirements. Indicator and control locations were established for comparison purposes to distinguish radioactivity of plant origin from natural or other "manmade" environmental radioactivity. The environmental monitoring program also verifies projected and anticipated radionuclide concentrations in the environment and related exposures from releases of radionuclides from SGS and HCGS. This program satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 1 0 CFR 50 and provides surveillance of all appropriate critical exposure pathways to man.

The detection capabilities, required by SGS's and HCGS's ODCM, were achieved for the 201 4 reporting period. Exceptions to the program are noted and the PSEG corrective action identifier was included in parenthesis. The

- 1 W

data that were collected in 201 4 demonstrate that both SGS and HCGS were operated in compliance with each plant's respective Technical Specifications and ODCMs and the applicable Federal regulations. The REMP objectives were also met.

Most of the radioactive materials noted in this report are either naturally occurring in the environment such as potassium (K) 40 or beryllium (Be) 7, or a result of non-nuclear generating station activity, such as atmospheric nuclear weapons testing or medical wastes. Measurements made in the vicinity of SGS and HCGS were compared to background or control measurements and the preoperational REMP study performed before SGS Unit 1 became operational.

Samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface water, ground (well) water, potable (drinking) water, vegetables, fodder crops, soil, fish, crabs and sediment were collected and analyzed. External radiation dose measurements were also made in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS using passive dosimeters.

The REMP complies with the following Safety Analysis Report (SAR) document sections:

Technical Specifications ODCM SGS U1 6.8.4.h 3/4. 1 2.1 6.9.1.7 SGS U2 6.8.4.h 3/4. 1 2.1 6.9.1.7 HCGS U 1 6.8.4.h 3/4. 1 2.1 6.9.1.6 To demonstrate this, compliance samples obtained from various media were analyzed for one or more of the following: gamma emitting isotopes, tritium (H-3), iodine-1 31 (1-1 31 ), gross alpha, gross beta and immersion dose. The results of these analyses were used to assess the environmental impact of SGS and HCGS operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with the respective SGS's and HCGS's Technical Specifications and ODCMs and the applicable Federal regulations.

There were a total of 1 688 analyses on 1 380 environmental samples during 201 4. Of the total number of analyses and environmental samples, direct radiation dose measurements were made using 21 8 sets of direct reading dosimeters.

In addition to the naturally occurring isotopes (i.e. Be-7, K-40, Ra-226, and Th-232) cesium-1 37 was identified in one sediment sample at a concentration of 29 pCi!kg. Cesium-1 37 from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing is routinely found in sediment and soil samples.

Ambient radiation measurements are made with quarterly passive dosimeters at onsite and offsite locations around SGS/HCGS. The direct radiation component was determined by comparing badges on the site boundary (5S1, 1 0S1, 1 1 S1, 1 5S1and 1 5S2) to the designated controls (3G1 and 1 4G1 ). The direct radiation dose is determined by subtracting the control data from the badge data. The range of the site boundary dosimeters, with an annual dose between 45 mR and 50 mR, were lower than the control locations of 59 mR and 62 mR. Therefore, there was no measurable direct radiation to a member of the public at the site boundary.

The reason that the site badges are lower is that the surrounding waters lower the radon concentration and limit terrestrial radiation. The 201 4 dose measurements were comparable to the levels prior to station operation that had an average of 55 mR per year for 1 973 to 1 976.

The ambient radiation levels as measured by the two site boundary locations 1 S1 and 1 6S2 ranged from 34.7 mR/Standard Quarter to 38.8 mR!Standard Quarter. The doses at these two locations were influenced by the radiation shine from the dry cask storage located in the nearby Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). The Federal Regulations 40 CFR 1 90 and 1 0 CFR 72.1 04 both limit the dose to a real member of the public to 25 mrem to the total body. To demonstrate compliance to these regulations, the maximum dose that a hypothetical individual member of the public was calculated at 5.1 mrem, which was well below the Federal limits for exposure.

Following the guidance in Nuclear Energy Institute's (NEI) 07-07, the results of the annual report of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP), formerly reported in this report, have been moved to the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report.

The concentration of radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to SGS and HCGS operations was only a small fraction of the concentration of naturally occurring and man-made radioactivity. The data obtained from the 201 4 REMP were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program. Combined with historical results collected since commercial operation, it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations were as expected and therefore, we conclude that the operation of SGS and HCGS had no significant radiological impact on the environment.

II.

The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program SGS and HCGS are located in Lower Alloways Creek Township, Salem County, New Jersey. SGS consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors. SGS Unit 1 has a net rating of 1 1 80 megawatt electric (MWe) and SGS Unit 2 has a net rating of 1 1 78 MWe. The licensed core power for both units is 3459 megawatt thermal (MWt). HCGS is a boiling water nuclear power reactor, which has a net rating of 1 21 2 MWe.

The licensed core power is 3840 MWt.

The Generating Stations are located on a man-made peninsula on the east bank of the Delaware River. The peninsula was created by the deposition of hydraulic fill from dredging operations. The surrounding environment is characterized mainly by the Delaware River Estuary and Bay, extensive tidal marshlands, and low-lying meadowlands. These land types make up approximately 85% of the land area within five miles of the site, with most of the remaining land used for agriculture.

Since 1 968, a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been conducted at SGS and HCGS. Starting in December 1972, a more extensive radiological monitoring program was initiated in preparation for the operation of SGS Unit 1. The operational REMP was initiated in December 1 976 when SGS Unit 1 achieved criticality.

An overview of the 201 4 REMP is provided in Table B-2, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

Radioanalytical data from samples collected under this program were compared with results from the preoperational phase and historical results during operations. Differences between these periods were examined statistically to determine the effects of station operations. This report presents the results from January 1 through December 31, 201 4, for the SGS/HCGS REMP.

A.

Objectives of the Operational REMP 1.

To fulfill the requirements of the Radiological Surveillance sections of the SGS and HCGS ODCMs.

2.

To determine whether any significant increase occurred in the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.

3.

To verify the models used by SGS and HCGS to predict the radioactive inventory in the surrounding environment.

4.

To detect any change in ambient gamma radiation levels.

5.

To verify that SGS and HCGS operations do not have detrimental effects on the health and safety of the public or on the environment.

B.

Implementation of the Objectives 1.

Samples of various media were selected for monitoring due to the radiological dose impact to human and other organisms.

The selection of samples was based on:

(a)

Established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides through the environment to man, and (b)

Experience gained during the preoperational phase.

Sampling locations were determined based on site meteorology, Delaware River Bay estuarine hydrology, local demography, and land uses.

2.

Sampling locations are divided into two classes: indicator and control. Indicator stations are those which are expected to manifest station effects. Control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by station operations, usually at 1 5 to 30 kilometers (9.3 to 1 8.6 miles) away from the generating stations. Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator stations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control stations. Indicator and control station data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data.

3.

Appendix A, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary, describes the coding system which identifies sample type and location and describes and summarizes the analytical results in accordance with Section 6.9.1.7 of the SGS ODCM and Section 6.9.1.6 of the HCGS ODCM. Table A-1 summarizes average, minimum and maximum activities of the indicator locations, control locations and location with the highest mean using values above the LLD.

4.

Appendix B, Sample Designation and Locations. Table B-1 Sampling Locations lists the station codes, locations, latitude, longitude and the types of samples collected at each station.

5.

The sampling locations are indicated on Maps B-1, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-site Sampling Locations and B-2, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-site Sampling Locations.

Ill.

Program Description A.

Data Interpretation Results of analyses are grouped according to sample type and presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. All results above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) are at a confidence level of+/- 2 sigma. This represents the range of values into which 95% of repeated analyses of the same sample should fall. As defined in U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG-1 301 and NUREG-1 302, LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95%

probability, with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal." The equation for determining LLD is:

LLD =

4.66

Sb E

V

2.22* Y

exp(-At) 4.66 is the statistical factor from NUREG 1 302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E

is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V

is the sample size in units of mass or volume,

2. 22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, Y

is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,

'A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-1 ), and t

for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection, or end of the sample collection period, and time of counting (sec).

The LLD is an "a priorl' number, which represents the capability of the measurement system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an after the fact criteria for the presence of activity. All analyses are designed to achieve the required SGS/HCGS detection limits for environmental sample analysis.

The Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) is defined as above with the exception that the measurement is an "a posteriad' (after the fact) estimate of the presence of activity. The MDC is generally lower than the LLD.

The grouped data were averaged and standard deviations calculated.

The +/- 2 sigma deviations of the averaged data represent sample and not analytical variability. For reporting and calculation of averages, any positive result occurring at or below the LLD is considered to be at that level.

B.

Program Exceptions Gross Beta in air particulates LLD of 1 OE-3 pCi/m3 was not met for the 1 /20/1 4 to 1/27/14 sample at location 2F6 due to low sample volume.

The low sample volume was associated with the unit only being in service for 26.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months due to planned maintenance in the facility that supplies power to the air sampler. A MDC of 21.6E-3 pCilm3 was achieved (801 1 1 508-op01 0).

When changing the 5S2 air sampler filter on 8/4/1 4, the sampler was observed to be out of service. The sampler should have operated for 1 69.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months . However, actual recorded run time was 92.1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months for a total of 7700 cubic feet of air collected. The pump was replaced and sampler returned to service (701 68294 ).

The LLD for Surface Water was not met on samples collected 8/5/1 4 for locations 1 1A1, 1 2C1, 1 F2, 1 6F1, and 7E1. Samples were collected on 08/05/1 4 and were received on 09/1 7/1 4. Due to the age of the samples upon arrival at the laboratory, the LLD could not be metfor Bala-1 40 & 1-1 31 (1 0400229).

REMP air station 1 6E1 lost approximately five hours of data the week of 09/01/1 4 to 09/08/1 4. There was a storm during the week that is suspected to have caused a loss of power, accounting for the five hours of missing data. No other problems were observed and the sample station was running as expected on 09/08/1 4 (701 69066).

Air samplers 5S1 and 5S2 were out of service from 0239 1 0/07/1 4 until 1 330 1 0/08/1 4 and again on 1 1/23/1 4 from 0949 to 1 800 due to electrical tagout for planned maintenance on the checkpoint emergency diesel generator (701701 37, 801 1 31 72-op200).

C.

Program Changes There were no revisions of the SGS ODCM or of the HCGS ODCM during this reporting period.

Surface water gross beta analysis by TBE was discontinued in 201 4.

It is not an ODCM requirement and mainly served to indicate potassium-40 level which is measured directly by gamma analysis.

The types of sample media analyzed by duplicate samples were increased to improve the overall QA program. Duplicate samples are collected with one sample generally sent to TBE and the second sample to GEL. Table C-1 9 was added for positive results obtained by GEL. Results of less than detectable are not included since goal is to compare those positive results for agreement.

D.

Quality Assurance Program Teledyne Brown Engineering The quality of the results obtained by TBE is ensured by the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program as described in the TBE Quality Assurance Manual and the TBE Procedure Manual.

E.

Summary of Results: Inter-laboratory Comparison Program TBE analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 1 69 analyses (Appendix D, Tables D-1 through D-3). GEL analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine,

- 1 0 -

milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 446 analyses (Appendix D, Tables D-4 through D-7).

The PE samples, supplied by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc (EZA),

Environmental Resource Associates (ERA), and Department of Energy's (DOE) Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following acceptance criteria:

1.

EZA Evaluation Criteria EZA's evaluation report provides a ratio of reported result and EZA's known value. Since flag values are not assigned by EZA, TBE evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

2.

ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), National Environmental Laboratory Conference (NELAC) performance testing (PT) program requirements, or ERA's standard operating procedure (SOP) for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document.

3.

DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.

- 1 1 -

The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/- 20% to +/- 30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% < bias < 30% ). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

Teledyne Brown Engineering In reviewing their environmental interlaboratory crosscheck programs, TBE identified 1 ) duplication of efforts on some matrices and isotopes and 2) that TBE performed crosscheck samples on some matrices and isotopes that were not performed for clients. Since the DOE MAPEP is designed to evaluate the ability of analytical facilities to correctly analyze for radiological constituents representative of those at DOE sites, the needed changes were made to the analyses provided by the MAPEP. Therefore, the following isotopes were removed from the MAPEP:

Soil -gamma - will be provided by EZA twice per year, starting in 201 5. For 201 4, one soil gamma is provided by MAPEP, the 2nd soil gamma is provided by EZA.

Air Particulate - gamma-is currently provided by EZA.

Water - gamma, H-3, Sr-90, uranium, gross alpha and gross beta currently provided by EZA.

MAPEP evaluates non-reported (NR) analyses as failed if they were reported in the previous series.

- 1 2-

For the TBE laboratory, 1 63 out of 1 69 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (Ni-63, K-40 and 1-1 31 in water, and two Sr-90s and one Gross Alpha in AP samples) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1.

TBE's MAPEP March 201 4 Ni-63 in water result of 32.7 +/- 1.69 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data but would have passed the acceptance range of 23.9 - 44.2 Bq/L (NCR 1 4-04).

2.

TBE's MAPEP March 201 4 K-40 in water result of 1.63 +/- 2.49 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data but would have passed the false positive test (NCR 1 4-04).

3.

TBE's ERA November 2014 1-1 31 in water result of 1 5.8 pCi/L was lower than the known value of 20.3 pCi/L, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 1 6.8. The result was evaluated as failed with a "found to known" ratio of 0.778. No cause could be found for the slightly low result. All ERA 1-1 31 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable (NCR 1 4-08).

4.

TBE's MAPEP March 201 4 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.822 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 1.1 8 Bq/sample, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 0.83 Bq/sample. The reanalyzed result was still low, but fell within the lower acceptance range of 0.836. The reanalyzed result was statistically the same number as the original result. No cause could be found for the slightly low results (NCR 1 4-04).

5.

TBE's MAPEP September 2014 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.31 0 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0. 703 Bq/sample. The gravimetric yield of 1 1 7% was very high (we

- 1 3 -

normally see yields of 60% to 70 %) and could account for the low activity (NCR 1 4-09).

6.

TBE's MAPEP September 2014 Gr-Aipha in AP result of 0.1 53 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0.53 Bq/sample.

The AP sample was counted on the wrong side. The AP filter was flipped over and recounted with accptable results (NCR 1 4-09).

For the GEL laboratory, 440 out of 446 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (U-234/233 and U238 in soil, one U-235 in Vegetation, two Sr-89s and one Am-241 in water) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1.&2. GEL's MAPEP June 201 4 U-234/233 and U-238 in soil reported values were lower than the MAPEP known values. It was determined that the digestion method using hydrofluoric acid (HF) was insufficient to completely digest the soil. MAPEP posted on their website that the analytes had been fused into the soil at an extremely high temperature. Reanalysis using a sodium hydroxide (NAOH) fusion method prior to ion exchange separation chemistry gave results for U-234/233 and U-238 that fell within the acceptance criteria (Corrective Action CARR 1 40605-879).

3.

GEL's MAPEP June 201 4 U-238 in vegetation reported value was higher than the MAPEP known value. The failure was due to a hand entry error when entering the result into the MAPEP website. The activity was incorrectly entered as 0.261

- 1 4-

ug/sample instead of the correct result of 0.0261 ug/sample (Corrective Action CARR1 40605-879).

4.&5. Two of GEL's ERA August 201 4 Sr-89 in water reported values were higher than the ERA known values. The associated QC samples and instrument calibrations were reviewed but a cause for the failures could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error caused the high bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR1 40825-902).

6. GEL's ERA May 201 4 Am-241 in water reported value was higher than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure count not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error caused the high bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR 1 40520-87 4 ).

F.

Summary of Results: Duplicate Sample Comparison Program Duplicate samples were obtained for some samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface water, vegetables, game, fish, crabs and sediment. These samples were analyzed by GEL as comparison and validation of TBE results (Table C-1 9).

1.

Air Particulates Gross Beta had positive results on all 48 duplicate samples.

GEL reports significantly higher Gross Beta results due to GEL and TBE using different calibration energy sources (801 1 0821 ).

Be-7 had positive results on all four duplicate samples analyzed and were in agreement within analytical errors.

- 1 5 -

2.

Air Iodine All 48 duplicate samples were less than MDC so direct comparison was not possible.

3.

Milk Potassium-40 had positive results on all 1 1 duplicate samples and were in agreement within analytical errors.

4.

Surface Water Potassium-40 was positive on all four GEL results but on only one TBE result. Tritium was positive on one of the four samples. All were in agreement within analytical errors.

5.

Vegetables On the 1 8 duplicate samples analyzed, 22 isotopes were positive on the GEL results. The NRC ratio based on resolution was used for acceptance criteria and 20 of the 22 positive results passed. One result was detected by GEL but not detected by TBE which was also considered.acceptable. One result was outside the acceptance criteria. Overall this is considered an acceptable duplicate sample comparison.

6.

Game Potassium-40 had positive results on both the duplicate samples and were in agreement within analytical errors.

7.

Fish Potassium-40 had positive results on both the duplicate samples and were in agreement within analytical errors.

- 1 6-

8.

Crab Potassium-40 had positive results on the one duplicate sample and was in agreement within analytical errors.

9.

Sediment Potassium-40 was positive on all three samples and were in agreement within analytical errors. Ra-226 was positive on two GEL results but was less than MDC on TBE results. Be-7 was positive on one GEL result but was less than MDC on TBE result.

IV.

Results and Discussion The analytical results of the 201 4 REMP samples are divided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct radiation, terrestrial, and aquatic. The analytical results for the 201 4 REMP are summarized in Appendix A, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary. The data for individual samples are presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. The data are compared to the formal preoperational environmental monitoring program data (1 973-1 976) and to historical data during operations. The data collected demonstrates that the SGS's and HCGS's REMP was conducted in compliance with the Technical Specifications and SGS's and HCGS's ODCM.

The REMP for the SGS/HCGS Site has historically included samples and analyses not specifically required by the SGS's and HCGS's ODCM. These analyses are referenced throughout the report as Management Audit samples. L TS continues to collect these samples. The summary tables in this report include these additional samples and analyses.

These Management Audit Samples are samples that are taken to augment the radiological effluent monitoring program, but do not have a regulatory

- 1 7 -

basis nor do they fulfill any regulatory requirement. The following is a list and quantity of the Management audit samples collected in 201 4:

Sample Type Number of Samples Food Crops 29 Well Water 1 2 Potable Water (raw and treated) 24 t---

Fodder Crops 4

Beef and Game A.

Atmospheric 3

Air particulate (APT) samples were collected on Schleicher-Schuell No. 25 glass fiber filters with low-volume air samplers.

Iodine was collected from the air by adsorption on triethylene-diamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridge connected in series after the air particulate filters. Air sample volumes were measured with calibrated dry-gas meters. The displayed volumes were corrected to standard temperature and pressure.

1.

Air Particulates Air particulate (APT) samples were collected weekly at seven indicator locations (1 6E1, 1 5S2, 1 F1, 2F6, 501, 5S1 and 7S1 ),

one duplicate station (5S2) and one control location (14G1 ).

The duplicate station sample was shipped to the QC laboratory GEL for analysis. Each weekly sample collected was analyzed for gross beta. Quarterly composites of the weekly samples from each station were analyzed for specific gamma emitters.

- 1 8 -

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in 362 of 364 of the indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 4E-03 pCi/m3 to 28E-03 pCi/m3 with an average concentration of 1 3E-03 pCi/m3, and in 52 of 52 of the control station samples at concentrations ranging from ?E-03 pCi/m3 to 20E-03 pCi/m3 with an average of 1 4E-03 pCI/m3. The maximum preoperational level detected was 920E-03 pCi/m3 with an average concentration of 74E-03 pCi!m3 (Table C-2, Appendix C) [Figure 1 - Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulate 1 990 through 201 4 are plotted as quarterly averages, with an inset depicting the period 1 973 to 201 4].

Gamma Spectrometry Gamma spectroscopy was performed on each of the 32 quarterly composite samples.

Beryllium-?, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in all 28 indicator station composites at concentrations ranging from 59E-03 pCi/m3 to 1 39E-03 pCilm3 with an average concentration of 97E-03 pCi/m3, and in the four control station composites ranging in concentration from 88E-03 pCi!m3 to 1 1 4E-03 pCilm3 with an average concentration of 1 01 E-03 pCi/m3. The maximum preoperational level detected was 330E-03 pCi/m3 with an average concentration of 1 09E-03 pCi/m3. Naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in one of 28 indicator station composites at a concentration of 56E-03 pCi/m3. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1,

Appendix C).

- 1 9 -

2.

Air Iodine Filtered air iodine samples (AIO) were collected weekly at seven indicator locations ( 1 6E1, 1 582, 1 F1, 2F6, 5D1, 581 and 781 ), one duplicate station (582) and one control location (14G1 ). The duplicate station sample was shipped to the QC laboratory GEL for analysis. Each sample was analyzed for 1-1 31. lodine-1 31 was not detected in any indicator or control samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 42E-03 pCi/m3 (Table C-3, Appendix C).

B.

Direct Radiation Ambient radiation levels in the environs were measured with a pair of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) supplied and processed by Mirion Technologies. Packets containing these passive dosimeters were placed in the owner-controlled area and around the Site at various distances and in each land based meteorological sector and analyzed quarterly. Emphasis was placed on special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools.

A total of 58 Immersion Dose Monitor (IDM) locations were established to monitor for direct radiation during 2014, including 20 on-site locations (1 81, 282,284,381,481,581,682,781,881,981,

1 081, 1 1 81, 1 281,1 381, 1 481, 1 581, 1 582, 1681, 1 682, and 1 683),

32 off-site locations within the 1 0 mile zone (1 F1, 2E1, 2F2, 2F5, 2F6, 3E1,3F2,3F3,4D2,4F2,501,5F1,6F1, 7F2,8F1, 9F1, 1 0D1, 1 0F2, 1 1 E2, 1 1 F1, 1 2E1,1 2F1, 1 3E1, 1 3F2, 13F3,1 3F4,1 4D1, 14F2, 1 5D1, 1 5F3, 1 6E1 and 1 6F2) and six control locations beyond 1 0 miles (1 G3, 3G1, 3H1, 1 0G 1, 1 4G 1, and 1 6G1).

Each location has two TLDs, containing two thermoluminescent phosphors of calcium fluoride (CaF) and Lithium Fluoride (LiF) phosphors.

The average quarterly dose rate for the offsite dosimeters was 14.1 mR!Standard Quarter. Excluding locations 1 S1 and 1 6S2, the onsite site boundary locations average quarterly dose rate was 1 3.0 mR/Standard Quarter. The control locations average quarterly dose rate was 1 4.0 mR/Standard Quarter. No significant differences were noted between the three groups (Table C-4, Appendix C).

The ambient radiation levels as measured by the two site boundary locations 1 S1 and 1 682 ranged from 34.7 mR!Standard Quarter to 38.8 mR/Standard Quarter. The doses at these two locations were influenced by the radiation shine from the dry cask storage located in the nearby Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI).

Assuming a nominal background of 52 mR/year (13 mR/Standard Quarter) the maximum dose in these areas that could potentially affect a member of the population was calculated using the annual air exposure from location 1 6S2 of 92.7 mrem per year (1 55 mR/year -

52 mR/year

0.9 mrem/mR).

40 CFR 1 90 and 1 0 CFR 72. 1 04 both limit the dose to a real member of the public to 25 mrem to the total body. The nearest resident in the North sector is greater than five miles and 4.2 miles in the NNW sector, respectively from SGS/HCGS. To demonstrate compliance to these regulations, an individual member of the public is assumed to enter the site boundary area near the ISFSI for 20 days per year. The dose that this hypothetical individual would receive was calculated at 5.1 mrem/year (92.7 mrem/year

20 days I 365 days) which is well below the federal limits for exposure.

The preoperational average for the quarterly TLD readings was 4.4 mR/Standard Month or 1 3.2 mR/Standard Quarter. The results of the direct radiation measurements for 201 4 confirmed that the radiation levels in the vicinity of the SGS and HCGSs were similar to previous years.

C.

Terrestrial Terrestrial REMP sampling includes the collection of milk, well water, potable water, vegetation, fodder crops and soil samples.

Milk samples (MLK) were taken semi-monthly when cows were on pasture and monthly when cows were not grazing on open pasture from three indicator locations (1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3) and one control location (3G1 ). Animals are considered on pasture from April to November of each year. Samples were collected in new polyethylene containers, sodium bisulfite was added, then the samples were frozen and transported in ice chests to the analytical laboratory.

Well water samples (WWA) were collected monthly from one location (3E1 ). Separate raw (PWR) and treated potable water (PWT) samples were collected monthly from one location (2F3). Each monthly composite was prepared by daily com positing by the City of Salem Water and Sewer Department. All samples were collected in new polyethylene containers.

Locally grown vegetables (FPV) were collected at the time of harvest at 1 0 locations (1 S1, 7S1, 1 001, 1 5S2, 1 6S1, 2F9, 3H5, 1 5F4, 1G1,

and 2G2); fodder crops (VGT) were sampled at four locations (1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3 and 3G1 ); and broad leaf vegetation (FPL) was sampled at five locations (1 001, 1 5S2, 1 6S1, 1 S1, and 7S2). The vegetables and fodder samples are additional samples (Management Audit) taken to enhance the radiological monitoring program. There is no dairy farm within three miles of SGS and HCGS and there is only one dairy within five miles. Therefore, broad leaf vegetation is grown, maintained and harvested by L TS personnel in the late fall. All samples were weighed, packaged and shipped to TBE for analysis.

1.

Milk Milk samples were collected at four local dairy farms (two farms in New Jersey and two in Delaware). Each sample was analyzed for 1-1 31 and gamma emitters.

lodine-1 31 lodine-1 31 was not detected above MDC in any of the 80 samples analyzed. The LLDs were met. The maximum preoperational level detected was 65 pCi/L, which occurred following a period of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests (Table C-5, Appendix C).

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 80 samples with concentrations for the 60 indicator station samples ranging from 1, 1 51 pCi/L to 1,585 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1,353 pCi/L, and the 20 control station sample concentrations ranging from 1,061 pCi!L to 1,430 pCi!L, with an average concentration of 1,295 pCi/L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2,000 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1,437 pCi/L. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-5, Appendix C).

2.

Well Water (Ground Water)

Although offsite wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are not directly affected by plant operations, well water samples were collected monthly from one farm (3E1 ). Samples from this well are considered Management Audit samples.

Gross Alpha Gross alpha activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.6 pCi/L (Table C-6, Appendix C).

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the well water samples. The preoperational results ranged from <2.1 pCi/L to 38 pCi/L, with an average value of 9 pCi/L (Table C-6, Appendix C).

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 380 pCi/L (Table C-6, Appendix C).

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring potassium-40 and radium-226 were not detected in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected were 30 pCi/L and 2.0 pCi/L, respectively. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-7, Appendix C).

3.

Potable Water (Drinking Water)

Both raw and treated potable water samples were collected and com posited by The City of Salem Water and Sewer Department personnel. Each sample consisted of daily aliquots com posited into a monthly sample. The raw water source for this plant is Laurel Lake and its adjacent wells. These are Management Audit samples as no liquid effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS directly affect this pathway.

Gross Alpha No gross alpha activity was detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2.7 pCi/L (Table C-8, Appendix C).

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in 1 0 of the 12 raw water samples and in 1 2 of the 1 2 treated water samples. The concentrations for the raw samples ranged from 3.5 pCi/L to 6.9 pCi/L. Concentrations for the treated water ranged from 3.0 pCi/L to 8.1 pCi/L. The average concentration for both raw and treated water was 5.1 pCi!L. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9.0 pCi/L with an average concentration of 4.2 pCi/L (Table C-8, Appendix C).

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 350 pCi/L with an average of 1 79 pCi/L (Table C-8, Appendix C).

lodine-1 31 lodine-1 31 measurements were performed to an LLD of 1.0 pCi!L. lodine-131 activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison, since 1-1 31 was not analyzed as a specific radionuclide analysis prior to 1 989. Since that time all results have been below the MDC (Table C-9, Appendix C).

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison. Naturally occurring Ra-226 was not detected in any raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 1.4 pCi/L. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-9, Appendix C).

4.

Vegetables There are no farm products that are irrigated with water in which liquid plant effluents have been discharged.

A variety of food products are sampled from around the plant; however, the variety is dependent on the farmer's preference.

These vegetables are collected as Management Audit samples.

In addition, broad leaf vegetation was grown by L TS personnel and planted at four onsite locations and one offsite location in Delaware at 3.9 miles SSW. These broad leaf vegetable samples are collected since there are no milk farms operating within the five km radius of SGS/HCGS. The closest milk farm (1 3E3) is located in Odessa, DE at 5.0 miles (7.88 km).

All samples (vegetable and broad leaf) were analyzed for gamma emitters and included asparagus, cabbage, collards, sweet corn, peppers, and tomatoes. These samples were from eight indicator stations (62 samples) and three control stations (1 2 samples). The results for these samples are discussed below.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in 1 1 of the 62 indicator station samples, with concentrations ranging from 1 79 pCi/kg (wet) to 363 pCi/kg (wet), with an average concentration of 246 pCi/kg (wet). It was not detected in any of the control station samples.

No preoperational data were available for comparison.

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 62 indicator samples, with concentrations ranging from 1,655 pCi/kg (wet) to 6,784 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,775 pCi/kg (wet), and in all 1 2 control station samples at concentrations ranging from 1,626 pCi/kg (wet) to 3,267 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,353 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 4,800 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,1 40 pCi!kg (wet)

(Table C-1 0, Appendix C).

All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC.

5.

Fodder Crops Although not required by the SGS and HCGS ODCMs, four samples of silage normally used as cattle feed were collected from three indicator stations and one control station. It was determined that these products could be an element in the food-chain pathway.. These fodder crops are collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters.

All four locations from which samples were collected are milk sampling stations.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in two of the three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 233 pCi/kg (wet) to 265 pCilkg (wet) with an average concentration of 249 pCi/kg (wet), and in the control station sample at a concentration of 265 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected for silage was 4,700 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,000 pCi/kg (wet).

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 3,036 pCi/kg (wet) to 4,532 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,790 pCi/kg (wet), and in the control station sample at a concentration of 4.,532 pCi/kg (wet). Preoperational results averaged 7,000 pCi/kg (wet). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 1, Appendix C).

6.

Soil Soil is sampled every three years at nine locations and analyzed for gamma emitters. These Management Audit samples were collected in 201 3 and will not be collected again until 201 6 (Table C-1 2, Appendix C) [Figure 4 - Cesium-1 37 Activity in Soil 1 97 4 through 201 3, which is the most recent sample, are plotted as the triennial average].

7. Beef and Game Although not required by the SGS or HCGS ODCMs, three muskrat samples were collected from two indicator stations.

The game samples were collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three samples at concentrations ranging from 2,81 1 to 3,27 4 pCilkg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,973 pCi/kg (wet). No preoperational data were available for comparison. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 3, Appendix C).

D.

Aquatic Environmental Consulting Services, Inc. (ECSI) collected all aquatic samples (with the exception of the 6S2 shoreline sediment). This sample set includes edible fish, shoreline and riverbed sediment, surface water and crab.

Surface water samples were collected offshore. The technicians collected the samples in new polyethylene containers that were rinsed twice with the sample medium prior to collection. The surface water samples were transported to TBE for analysis.

Edible fish were taken by gill nets while crabs were caught in commercial traps. These samples were processed by separating the flesh from the bone and shell. The flesh was placed in sealed containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests to TBE for analysis.

Sediment samples collected by ECSI were taken with a bottom grab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests to TBE. For the river bottom sediment, a marine GPS was used to locate the correct site and the sampling boat was maneuvered over the area until the correct amount of sample was obtained (grabbed) with the sediment dredge. Personnel from L TS collected and prepared the location 6S2 shoreline sediment sample (an onsite location).

For this location, a square area, measuring one meter on each side was staked out and then divided into a grid of nine smaller boxes, three per side. A one inch deep scoop from the center of each of the small grids was taken. All the aliquots were combined and the total sample transported in the ice chest to TBE.

1.

Surface Water Surface water samples were collected monthly at four indicator stations and one control station in the Delaware River Bay Estuary. One location (1 1 A1 ) is at the outfall area (which is the area where liquid radioactive effluents from SGS are discharged into the Delaware River), one is downstream from the outfall area (7E 1 ), and one is directly west of the outfall area at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River ( 1 2C1 ). Two upstream locations are in the Delaware River (1 F2) and at the mouth of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal (1 6F1 ), the latter being sampled when the flow is from the Canal into the river.

Station 1 2C1, directly west, at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River, serves as the operational control. Location 1 2C1 was chosen as the control location because the physical W 30 -

characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the farther upstream location (1 F2). As discussed in the preoperational summary report, due to the tidal nature of this Delaware River Bay Estuary, there are flow rate and salinity variations in the River. These variations will account for differences in concentrations of K-40.

Tritium Tritium activity was detected in one of 48 indicator samples with a concentration of 1 760 pCi/L at location 1 1 A which is located at the SGS plant discharge. Tritium was not detected in any of the control samples. On 03/05/1 4 the Salem Unit 2 #22 Chemical Volume Control System (CVCS) Monitor Tank and Hope Creek Circulating Water Dewatering Sump were being released under approved permits around the time of sampling.

Reanalysis was performed and validated the initial measurement. The measured value was still far below the surface water limit of 30,000 pCi/L (801 1 1 508). The maximum preoperational level detected was 600 pCi/L, with an average concentration of 2 1 0 pCi/L (Table C-1 4, Appendix C) [Figure 2

- Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1 990 through 201 4; only the positive results are plotted and there is an inset graph depicting the period 1 973 to 201 4].

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in 1 8 of the 48 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 59 pCi/L to 1 50 pCi/L with an average concentration of 94 pCi/L, and in three of the 1 2 control station samples at concentrations ranging from 61 pCi/L to 1 1 3 pCi/L and an average of 87 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected for K-40 was 200 pCi/L with an average concentration of 48 pCi/L (Table C-1 5, Appendix C).

lodine-1 31 lodine-1 31 was not detected in any of the 48 indicator samples.

It was not detected in any of the control station samples. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 5, Appendix C).

2.

Fish Edible species of fish were collected semi-annually at two indicator stations and one control station and analyzed for gamma emitters in edible flesh. Samples included channel catfish and striped bass.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all eight indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 2,862 pCi/kg (wet) to 6,348 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 4,1 42 pCi/kg (wet), and all five control station samples at concentrations ranging from 3,077 pCi/kg (wet) to 4,306 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,857 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1 3,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,900 pCi/kg (wet). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 6, Appendix C).

3.

Blue Crab Blue crab samples were collected twice during the season at one indicator and one control station. The edible portions were analyzed for gamma emitters.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in both indicator station samples at concentrations of 2,91 6 pCi/kg (wet) and 3,952 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,434 pCi/kg (wet), and in both control station samples at concentrations of 3,024 pCi/kg (wet) and 3,044 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,034 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1 2,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2,835 pCilkg (wet). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 7, Appendix C).

4.

Sediment Sediment samples were collected semi-annually from six indicator stations and one control station. Location 6S2 is the only shoreline sediment sample location and is directly subject to tidal fluctuations.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 1 1 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 3,004 pCi/kg (dry) to 1 6,880 pCi/kg (dry), with an average concentration of 8,594 pCI/kg (dry), and at both control stations samples at concentrations of 14,480 pCi/kg (dry) and 1 5,780 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 1 5, 1 30 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 21,000 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 1 5,000 pCilkg (dry).

Cesium-1 37 was detected in one of the indicator samples at a concentration of 29 pCi!kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 400 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 1 50 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-1 8, Appendix C)

[Figure 3, Cesium-1 37 & Cobalt-60 Activity in Aquatic Sediment 1 990 through 201 4, plotted as semi-annual positive results, with an inset graph depicting the period 1 977 to 2014].

Naturally occurring Ra-226 was detected in five of the 1 1 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 1,903 pCi!kg (dry) to 3,01 6 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 2,343 pCilkg (dry). Naturally occurring Ra-226 was not detected in the two control station samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,200 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 760 pCi/kg (dry).

Naturally occurring Th-232 was detected in all 1 1 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 236 pCi/kg (dry) to 996 pCi!kg (dry) with an average concentration of 648 pCi/kg (dry), and in both of the control station samples at concentrations of 908 pCi!kg (dry) and 936 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 922 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1,300 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 840 pCilkg (dry). All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD (Table C-1 8, Appendix C).

E.

Land Use Survey Meteorological Sector N

NNE N E ENE E

ESE SE SSE s

ssw sw WSW w

WNW NW N NW SYNOPSIS OF 201 4 LAND USE CENSUS A land use census was conducted in each of the 16 meteorological sectors to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest garden of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft2) producing broad leaf vegetation. In accordance with SGS and HCGS ODCMs, the census was performed using a visual survey, Google Earth and by consulting with local agricultural authorities.

A comparison of the identified locations from the 2014 table with the 201 3 table shows that there was no change to the nearest milk animal, nearest resident, or nearest vegetable garden (>500 ft2) with broadleaf vegetation identified. Therefore, no formal dose evaluation or changes to the SGS and HCGS ODCMs are required. The 2014 Land Use Census results are summarized below:

Milk Nearest Vegetable Animal Residence Garden Meat Animal August, 201 4 August, 2014 August, 2014 August, 2014 Km (miles)

Km (miles)

None None None None None 8.0 (5.0)

None 6.8 (4.2)

None 6.2 (3.9)

None None None 6.2 (3.9)

None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None 6.2 (3.9)

None None None 6.9 (4.3) 7.3 (4.6) 7.3 (4.6)

None 7.1 (4.4)

None None 7.8 (4.9) 6.5 (4.0)

None None None 5.5 (3.4)

None None None 5.9 (3.7)

None None None 6.8 (4.2)

None None V.

Annotations to Previous AREOR Revision 1 to the 201 3 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report was issued in the fourth quarter of 201 4 and made corrections at that time.

VI.

Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations The Hope Creek primary water chemistry results for 201 4 were reviewed.

The specific activity of the primary coolant did not exceed 0.2 microcuries per gram Dose Equivalent 1-1 31 (DEl) so did not exceed the Technical Specifications limit specified in section 3.4.5.

VII.

Conclusions The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for SGS and HCGS was conducted during 201 4 in accordance with the SGS and HCGS ODCMs.

The LLD values required by the SGS and HCGS ODCMs were achieved with minor exceptions for this reporting period (See Appendix A and Appendix C).

The objectives of the program were also met during this period. The data collected assist in demonstrating that SGS and HCGS were operated in compliance with the SGS and the HCGS ODCMs' requirements.

The concentration of radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to SGS and HCGS operations was only a small fraction, when compared to the concentration of naturally occurring and man-made radioactivity in the environment. Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program, which ran from 1 973 to 1 976, and with historical results collected since commercial operation, PSEG Nuclear Personnel have concluded that the operation of the SGS and HCGS had no significant radiological impact on the environment.

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations of radioactivity in environmental samples were as expected.

VII I.

References

[1 ]

Radiation Management Corporation. "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Preoperation Summary - 1 973 through 1 976". RMC-TR-77-03, 1 978.

[2]

Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manuai" Salem Generating Station. Revision 27.

[3]

Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manuai" Hope Creek Generating Station. Revision 27.

[4]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: NUREG-1 301, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors", published Apri1 1 991.

[5]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: NUREG-1 302, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Boiling Water Reactors", published April 1 991.

Intentionally left blank APPEN DIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

A-1

Intentionally left blank

SAMPLE DESIGNATION The PSEG's Laboratory &Testing Services (L TS) identifies samples by a three part code. 1 ) The first two letters are the program identification code. Because of the proximity of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations a common environmental surveillance program is conducted. The identification code, "SA", has been applied to Salem and Hope Creek stations. 2) The next three letters identify the media sampled.

AIO = Air Iodine APT = Air Particulate ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab ESF = Edible Fish ESS = Sediment FPL = Green Leaf Vegetables FPV = Vegetables (Various)

GAM = Game (Muskrat)

IDM = Immersion Dose (TLD)

MLK = Milk PWR = Potable Water (Raw)

PWT =

Potable Water (Treated)

SOL = Soil SWA = Surface Water VGT = Fodder Crops (Various)

WWA= Well Water

3) The last three or four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from a standard reference point. The reference point is located at the midpoint between the center of the Salem Unit 1 and Salem Unit 2 containments. Of these, the first one or two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction as follows:

1 = N 2 = NNE 3 = NE 4 = ENE 5 = E 6 = ESE 7 = SE 8 = SSE 9 = S 1 0 = ssw 1 1 = sw 1 2 = WSW 1 3 = w 1 4 = WNW 1 5 = NW 1 6 = NNW The next digit is a letter which represents the radial distance from the reference point:

s

= On-site location E

=

4-5 miles off-site A

= 0-1 miles off-site F

=

5-1 0 miles off-site B

= 1 -2 miles off-site G

=

1 0-20 miles off-site c

= 2-3 miles off-site H

=

>20 miles off-site D

= 3-4 miles off-site The last number is the station numerical designation within each sector and zone; e.g.,

1,2,3,... etc. For example, the designation SA-WWA-3E1 would indicate a sample in the Salem and Hope Creek program (SA) consisting of well water (WWA) which had been collected in sector number 3, centered at 45 degrees (north east) with respect to the midpoint between Salem 1 and 2 containments at a radial distance of 4 to 5 miles off site, (therefore, radial distance E). The number 1 indicates that this is sampling station number 1 in that particular sector.

A-3

Intentionally left blank A-4

)>

I 01 TABLE A-1 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

!. AIRBORNE AIR PARTICULATE (E-3 pCi/m")

AIR IODINE (E-3 pCi/m3)

II. DIRECT DIRECT RADIATION (mR!standard quarter)

IlL TERRESTRIAL MILK (pCi/L)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

PERFORMED (LLD)*

G R-B 416 1 0 1 3 (362/364)

(4/28)

GAMMA 32 BE-7 NA 97 (28/28)

(59/139)

K-40 NA 32 (1/28)

CS-134 50

<LLD CS-137 60

<LLD GAMMA 416 1-1 31 70

<LLD TLD-QUARTERL Y 232 NA 14.6 (208/208)

(9.1/42.4) 1-131 80 1

<LLD GAMMA 80 K-40 NA 1 353 (60/60)

(1 1 51/1585)

DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 DOCKET NO. 50-354 January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 LOCA l iON WITH HIGHEST MEAN NAME DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SA-APT -15S2 0.59 MILES NW SA-APT-2F6 7.3 MILES NNE SA-APT-16E1 4.1 MILES NNW SA-IDM-16S2 0.6 MILES N OF SITE SA-MLK-14F4 7.6 MILES WNW MEAN (RANGE) 14 (52152)

(7/20) 1 08 (4/4)

(94/1 22) 32 (1/4) 38.8 (4/4)

(36.0/42.4) 1 388 (20/20)

(1269/1579)

CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF MEAN NONROUTINE (RANGE)

REPORTED MEASUREMENTS 14 (52152) 0 (7/20) 1 01 (4/4) 0 (88/1 14)

<LLD 0

14.0 (24/24) 0 (1 0.2/17.0)

<LLD 0

1295 (20/20) 0 (1 061 /1430)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW.JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMEN1)

OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE)

(RANGE)

REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)*

MEASUREMENTS MILK ( cont'd)

CS-134 1 5

<LLD

<LLD 0

(pCi!L)

CS-1 37 1 8

<LLD

<LLD 0

BALA-140 1 5

<LLD

<LLD 0

RA-226 NA

<LLD

<LLD 0

)>

I m

WELL WATER GR-A 12 3

<LLD NA 0

(pCi/L)

GR-8 12 4

<LLD NA 0

H-3 12 200

<LLD NA 0

GAMMA 12 K-40 NA

<LLD NA 0

MN-54 1 5

<LLD NA 0

C0-58 15

<LLD NA 0

FE-59 30

<LLD NA 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE}

(RANGE)

REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)*

MEASUREMENTS WELL WA1ER (cont'd)

C0-60 1 5

<LLD NA 0

(pCi!L)

ZN-65 30

<LLD NA 0

ZRNB-95 1 5

<LLD NA 0

)>

1-1 31 1

<LLD NA 0

I

-...J CS-134 1 5

<LLD NA 0

CS-1 37 18

<LLD NA 0

BALA-140 15

<LLD NA 0

RA-226 NA

<LLD NA 0

POTABLE WATER GR-A 24 3

<LLD NA 0

(pCi/L)

GR-B 24 4

5.4 (22/24)

SA-PWT-2F3 5.5 (12/12)

NA 0

(3.0/8.1) 8.0 MILES NNE (3.0/8.1)

H-3 24 200

<LLD NA 0

TABLE A-1 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

POTABLE WATER ( cont'd)

(pCi!L)

)>

(X)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

PERFORMED (LLD)*

GAMMA 24 K-40 NA

<LLD MN-54 1 5

<LLD C0-58 1 5

<LLD FE-59 30

<LLD C0-60 1 5

<LLD ZN-65 30

<LLD ZRNB-95 15

<LLD 1-1 31 1

<LLD CS-134 15

<LLD CS-137 1 8

<LLD BALA-140 1 5

<LLD DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 DOCKET NO. 50-354 January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 LOCATION WITH HlGHEST MEAN NAME DISTANCE AND DIRECTION CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (RANGE)

(RANGE)

REPORTED MEASUREMENTS NA 0

NA 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE)

(RANGE)

REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)*

MEASUREMENTS POTABLE WATER (cont'd)

RA-226 NA

<LLD NA 0

(pCiJL)

VEGETATION GAMMA 74 (pCi/kg wet)

BE-7 NA 246 (1 1!62)

SA-FPL-1 0D1 286 (2/7)

<LLD 0

(179!363) 3.9 MILES SSW (209/363)

K-40 NA 3775 (62/62)

SA-FPL-7S1 6189 (2/2) 2353 (12/12) 0 (1655/6784)

(5968/641 0)

(1626/3267)

)>

1-131 60

<LLD

<LLD 0

I

<0 CS-134 60

<LLD

<LLD 0

CS-137 80

<LLD

<LLD 0

RA-226 NA

<LLD

<LLD 0

TH-232 NA

<LLD

<LLD 0

FODDER CROPS GAMMA 4

(pCilkg wet)

BE-7 NA 249 (2/3)

SA-VGT-2G3 265 (1/1)

<LLD 0

(233!265) 1 1.8 MILES NNE K-40 NA 3790 (3/3)

SA-VGT-2G3 4532 (1/1) 161 0 (1/1) 0

{3036/4532) 1 1.8 MILES NNE 1-131 60

<LLD

<LLD 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COuNTY, NEW JERSEY Jannary 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE)

(RANGE)

REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)*

MEASUREMENTS FODDER CROPS (cont'd)

CS-134 60

<LLD

<LLD 0

(pCi/kg wet)

CS-137 80

<LLD

<LLD 0

RA-226 NA

<LLD

<LLD 0

)>

TH-232 NA

<LLD

<LLD 0

0 ANIMAL GAMMA 3

(pCi/kg wet)

BE-7 NA

<LLD NA 0

K-40 NA 2973 (3/3)

SA-GAM-3E1 3274 (1/1)

NA 0

(281 1/3274) 1-131 60

<LLD NA 0

CS-134 60

<LLD NA 0

CS-137 80

<LLD NA 0

IV. AQUATIC SURFACE WATER H-3 60 200 1760 (1/48)

SA-SWA-1 1 A1 1760 (1/12)

<LLD 0

(pCi/L) 0.2 MILES SW

TABLE A-1 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

SURFACE WATER (cont'd)

(pCi/L)

)>

I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

PERFORMED (LLD)*

GAMMA 60 K-40 NA 12 (59/150)

MN-54 15

<LLD C0-58 1 5

<LLD FE-59 30

<LLD C0-60 1 5

<LLD ZN-65 30

<LLD ZRNB-95 1 5

<LLD 1-131 1

<LLD CS-134 1 5

<LLD CS-137 1 8

<LLD BALA-140 15

<LLD DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 DOCKET NO. 50-354 January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN NAME DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SA-SWA-1 F2 7.1 MILES N CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (RANGE)

(RANGE)

REPORTED MEASUREMENTS 1 09 (2/12) 87 (3/12) 0 (68/1 50)

(61/11 3)

<LLD 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GE:t'I""ERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE)

(RANGE)

REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)*

MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (cont'd) 1-131 60 1

<LLD

<LLD 0

(pCi/L)

FISH GAMMA 1 3 (pCi/kg wet)

K-40 NA 4142 (8/8)

SA-ESF-7E1 41 81 (4/4) 3857 (5/5) 0 (2862/6348) 4.5 MILES SE (31 06/6348)

(3077/4306)

MN-54 130

<LLD

<LLD 0

)>

C0-58 130

<LLD

<LLD 0

ø N

FE-59 260

<LLD

<LLD 0

C0-60 1 30

<LLD

<LLD 0

ZN-65 260

<LLD

<LLD 0

CS-134 1 30

<LLD

<LLD 0

CS-137 1 50

<LLD

<LLD 0

RA-226 NA

<LLD

<LLD 0

BLUE CRABS GAMMA 4

(pCi/kg wet)

K-40 NA 3434 (2/2)

SA-ECH-1 1A1 3434 (2/2) 3034 (2/2) 0 (2916/3952) 0.2 MILES SW (2916/3952)

(3024/3044)

TABLE A-1 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

BLUE CRABS (cont'd)

(pCi/kg wet)

)>

I w

SEDIMENT (pCi/kg dry)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE)

PERFORMED (LLD)*

MN-54 1 30

<LLD C0-58 130

<LLD FE-59 260

<LLD C0-60 1 30

<LLD ZN-65 260

<LLD CS-134 1 30

<LLD CS-137 150

<LLD RA-226 NA

<LLD GAMMA 13 BE-7 NA

<LLD K-40 NA 8594 (1 1/1 1)

(3004/16880)

CS-134 1 50

<LLD DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 DOCKET NO. 50-354 January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NAME MEAN DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE)

SA-ESS-16F1 16475 (2/2) 6.9 MILES NNW (16070/1 6880)

MEAN (RANGE)

<LLD

<LLD 15130 (2/2)

(14480/15780)

<LLD NUMBER OF NONROUTINE REPORTED MEASUREMENTS 0

0 0

p-TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

SEDIMENT (cont'd)

(pCi/kg dry)

SALEM GENERATING STATION HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY ANALYSIS AND LOWER TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF OF ANALYSES DETECTION PERFORMED (LLD)*

CS-137 180 RA-226 NA TH-232 NA ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEAN (RANGE) 29 (1/1 1) 2343 (5/1 1)

(1903/3016) 648 (1 1/1 1)

(236/996)

DOCKET NO. 50-272/-311 DOCKET NO. 50-354 January 1, 2014 f{) December 31, 2014 LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN NAME DISTANCE AND DIRECTION SA-ESS-1 1A1 0.2 MILES SW SA-ESS-16A 1 0.24 MILES NNW SA-ESS-12C1 C 2.5 MILES WSW

LLD US TED IS TIIE LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION WHICH WE ENDEAVORED TO ACHIEVE DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD.

- MEAN CALCULATED USING VALVES ABOVE LLD ONLY. FRACTION OF MEASUREMENTS ABOVE LLD ARE IN P ARENTIIESES.

MEAN (RANGE) 29 (1/2) 2523 (2/2)

(2030/3016) 922 (2/2)

(908/936)

CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF MEAN NONROUTINE (RANGE)

REPORTED MEASUREMENTS

<LLD 0

<LLD 922 (2/2)

(908/936) 0 0

APPENDIX B SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS B-1

Intentionally left blank B-2

OJ

(,..)

TABLE B-1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1. Maps B-1 and B-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the Site. A Portable Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling locations.

All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED DEG. MIN.

DEG. MIN.

1 S1 0.55 mi. N 39 - 28.260 75 - 32.222 IDM, FPL 2S2 0.40 mi. NNE; lamp pole 65 near HC switch yard 39 - 28.98 75 - 32.1 0 IOM 2S4 0.60 mi. NNE; in the equipment laydown area 39 - 28.110 75 - 31.992 IDM 3S1 0.58 mi. NE 39 - 28.140 75 - 31.678 IOM 4S1 0.60 mi. ENE; site access road near intersection to TB-02 39 - 28.023 75 - 31.544 IOM 5S1 0.86 mi. E; site access road 39 - 27.668 75 - 31.187 IDM, AIO, APT 5S2 0.86 mi. E; site access road, duplicate sample 39 - 27.668 75 - 31.187 AIO, APT 6S2 0.23mi. ESE; area around helicopter pad 39 - 27.719 75 - 31.912

!OM, ESS, SOL 7S1 0.12 mi. SE; station personnel gate 39 - 27.720 75 - 32.1 5 IDM, AIO, APT, FPL 8S1 0.12 mi. SSE; fuel oil storage 39 - 27.676 75 - 32.055 IDM 9S1 0.12 mi. S; fuel oil storage 39 - 27.636 75 - 32.091 IOM 1 0S1 0.14 mi. SSW; circulating water building 39 - 27.700 75 - 32.160 IOM 1 1S1 0.09 mi. SW; circulating water building 39 - 27.719 75 - 32.225 IDM 1 2S1 0.09 mi. WSW; outside security fence 39 - 27.756 75 - 32.236 IOM 13S1 0.09 mi. W; outside security fence 39 - 27.801 75 - 32.267 IOM 14S1 0.10 mi. NNW; outside security fence 39 - 27.893 75 - 32.280 IDM 1 5Si 0.57 mi. NW; near river and barge slip 39 - 28.1 61 75 - 32.525 IDM, FPV 1 5S2 0.59 mi. NW; near river 39 - 28.12 75 - 32.32 IDM, AIO, APT, FPL 16S1 0.57 mi. NNW; on road near fuel oil storage tank 39 - 28.215 75 - 32.432 IDM, FPL 16S2 0.60 mi. NNW; near security firing range 39 - 28.1 6 75 - 32.17 IDM, FPL 16S3 1.0 mi. NNW; consolidated spoils facility 39 - 28.350 75 - 32.550 I OM*

1 1A1 0.20 mi. SW; Salem outfall area 39 - 27.59 75 - 32.25 ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF 1 1A1A 0.1 5 mi. SE; Located in the plant barge slip area 39 - 27.41 75 - 32.02 Alternate SWA

OJ I

6 TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL DEG. MIN.

DEG. MIN.

1 5A1 0.65 mi. NW; Hope Creek outfall area 39 - 27.67 75 - 32.19 16A1 0.24 mi. NNW; South Storm Drain outfall 39 - 28.24 75 - 32.58 5C1 3.14 mi. ENE 39 - 28.250 75 - 28.430 1 2C1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River 39 - 27.22 75 - 34.08 12C1A

3. 7 mi. WSW; Located at the tip of Augustine Beach Boat Ramp 39 - 30.17 75 - 34.48 402 3.7 mi. ENE; Alloway Creek Neck Road 39 - 29.292 75 - 28.175 501 3.5 mi. E; local farm 39 - 28.396 75 - 28.334 1001 3.9 mi. SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur 39 - 24.613 75 - 33.733 1401 3.4 mi. WNW; Bay View, Delaware 39 - 29.26 75 - 35.521 1 501 3.8 mi NW; Route 9, Augustine Beach, DE 39 - 30.125 75 - 35.28 2E1 4.4 mi. N NE; local farm 39 - 31.380 75 - 30.428 3E1 4.2 mi. N E; local farm 39 - 30.098 75 - 28.646 7E1 4.5 mi. SE; River Bank 1.0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 39 - 25.08 75 - 28.64 7E1A 8.87 mi. SE; Located at the end of Bayside Road 39 - 22.57 75 - 24.24 1 1 E2 5.0 mi. SW; Route 9 39 - 24.328 75 - 35.546 12E1 4.4 mi. WSW; Thomas landing 39 - 26.862 75 - 36.968 1 3E1 4.2 mi. W; Diehl House lab 39 - 27.989 75 - 36.735 1 3E3 5.0 mi. W; local farm 39 - 27.17 75 - 37.30 16E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn 39 - 30.762 75 - 34.580 1 F1 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg 39 - 32.693 75 - 31.124 1 F2 7.1 mi. N; midpoint of Delaware R.

39 - 33.08 75 - 32.54 2F2 8.5 mi. NNE; Salem Substation 39 - 34.522 75 - 28.120 2F3 8.0 mi. NNE; City of Salem Water and Sewage Department 39 - 33.40 75 - 27.1 8 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE; Salem High School 39 - 33.448 75 - 28.514 2F6 7.3 mi. NNE; PSE&G Training Center, Salem NJ 39 - 33.713 75 - 28.819 2F9 7.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm, Tilbury Rd, Salem 39 - 33.55 75 - 29.30 MEDIA SAMPLED ESS ESS GAM ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF Alternate SWA IOM IDM, AIO, APT IDM, FPL, SOL IDM IOM IOM IDM, WWA ESS, SWA, ESF Alternate SWA

!OM IOM IOM MLK, FPL, VGT, SOL I OM, AIO, APT, SOL IDM, AIO, APT, SWA IOM PWR, PWT IOM I OM, AIO, APT FPV, SOL

OJ I

U1 TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE 2F1 0 3F2 3F3 3F6 3F7 3F8 4F2 5F1 6F1 7F2 8F1 9F1 1 0F2 1 1 F1 1 2F1 1 3F2 1 3F3 1 3F4 14F2 14F4 1 5F3 1 5F4 16F1 16F1A STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL DEG. MIN.

9.2 mi. NNE; Local Farm, South Broadway (Route 49) Pennsville 39 - 35.35 5.1 mi. NE; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 39 - 30.410 8.6 mi. NE; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ 39 - 32.616 6.5 mi. NE; Local Farm, Salem/Hancocks Bridge Road 39 - 32.03 7.2 mi. NE; Local Farm, Beasley Neck Road, RD#3 39 - 32.07 9.3 mi. NE; Circle M Orchard 39 - 33.987 6.0 mi. ENE; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 39 - 29.953 6.5 mi. E; Canton, NJ 39 - 28.360 6.4 mi. ESE; Stow Neck Road 39 - 26.396 9.1 mi. SE; Bayside, NJ 39 - 22.971 9.7 mi. SE; Woodland Beach, DE 39 - 1 9.933 5.3 mi. S; off Route #9, DE 39 - 23.042 5.8 mi. SSW; Route #9, DE 39 - 23.034 6.2 mi. SW; Taylor's Bridge, DE 39 - 24.766 9.4 mi. WSW; Townsend Elementary School, DE 39 - 23.778 6.5 mi W; Odessa, DE 39 - 27.297 9.3 mi. W; Redding Middle School, Middletown, Delaware 39 - 27.215 9.8 mi. W; Middletown, DE 39 - 26.857 6.7 mi. WNW; Route 1 3 and Boyds Comer Rd 39 - 29.979 7.6 mi. WNW; local farm 39 - 30.44 5.4 mi. NW 39 - 30.987 7.0 mi. NW; local farm; Port Penn Road; Delaware 39 - 31.21 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal 39 - 33.55 6.84 mi. NNW; Located at the C&D Canal Tip 39 - 33.34 LONGITUDINAL DEG. MIN.

75 - 29.35 75 - 27.578 75 - 24.735 75 - 28.00 75 - 25.46 75 - 25.468 75 - 26.076 75 - 25.031 75 - 25.148 75 - 24.261 75 - 28.463 75 - 32.95 75 - 34.152 75 - 37.632 75 - 41.31 1 75 - 39.372 75 - 42.543 75 - 43.1 1 1 75 - 39.042 75 - 40.52 75 - 36.586 75 - 38.31 75 - 34.25 75 - 33.56 MEDIA SAMPLED FPV, FPL IDM IDM FPV FPV FPV IDM IDM,SOL IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM MLK, VGT, SOL IDM FPV ESS, SWA Alternate SWA

OJ I

0)

TABLE B-1 {cont'd)

SAMPLING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at an possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL DEG. MIN.

DEG. MIN.

16F2 8.1 mi. NNW; Delaware City Public School 39 - 34.314 75 - 35.429 1G1 1 0.9 mi. NNE; Route 49, South Broadway 39 - 37.1 13 75 - 30.178 1 G3 1 9 mi. N; N. Church Street Wilmington, Del 39 - 44287 75 - 32.512 2G2 1 3.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm; Pointers Auburn Road (Route 540),

39 - 38.19 75 - 26.10 Salem, NJ 08079 2G3 1 1.8 mi. NNE; Local Milk Farm 39 - 36.21 75 - 24.53 2G4 1 1.3 mi. NNE; large family garden; Route 45 & Welchville Road, 39 - 36.02 75 - 25.21 Mannington, NJ 3G1 17 mi. NE; local farm 39 - 35.913 75 - 16.804 9Gi 1 0.3 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Road., Smyrna, 39 - 18.47 75 - 33.50 Delaware 9G2 10.7 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Road, Smyrna, 39 - 1 8.39 75 - 34.1 1 Delaware 1 0G1 12 mi. SSW; Smyrna, Delaware 39 - 1 8.223 75 - 36.095 14G1 1 1.8 mi. WNW; Route 286, Bethel Church Road., DE 39 - 31.290 75 - 46.495 16G1 15 mi. NNW; Wilmington Airport 39 - 40.637 75 - 35.570 3H1 32 mi. NE; National Park, NJ 39 - 51.599 75 - 1 1.96 3H5 25 mi. NE; Farm Market, Route 77 39 - 41.040 75 - 12.380 MEDIA SAMPLED

!OM FPV IDM FPV MLK, VGT, SOL FPV IDM, MLK, VGT, SOL FPV FPV IDM AIO,APT,IDM IDM IDM FPV NOTE: All station locations are referenced to the midpoint of the two Salem Units' Containments. The coordinates of this location are: Latitude N 39° - 27' - 46.5" and Longitude W 75° - 32' -

10.6".

All Vegetables (FPV & FPL) and Vegetation (VGT) are management audit samples. They are not required by the Salem & Hope Creek Stations' Technical Specifications nor listed in the Stations ODCMs. Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer due to crop rotation.

OJ I

EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE 1. DIRECT RADIATION Dosimeters TABLE 8-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (Program Overview)

NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS Fifty-eight routine monitoring stations with two or more dosimeters placed as follows:

An inner ring of stations, at least one in meteorological sector in the general area of the site boundary.

An outer ring of stations, at least one in each meteorological sector in the 3.4 - 6.4 mile range from the site <1l.

The balance of the stations placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools and in six areas beyond 1 0 miles to serve as control stations.

SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY Quarterly TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS Gamma dose/ quarterly

OJ CXl EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE

2.

ATMOSPHERIC

a. Air Particulate

b.

Air Iodine

3. TERRESTRIAL

a. Milk TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS 3 samples from close to the Site Boundary: 5S1, 7S1,

1 6S 1.

One duplicate sample from close to the site boundary:

5S2.

3 Samples in different land based sectors: 1 F1, 2F6, 501.

1 Sample from the vicinity of a community: 1 6E1.

1 Sample from a control location; for example 1 5 - 30 km distant (9.3 - 1 8.6 miles) and in the least prevalent wind direction: 1 4G 1.

Samples from milking animals i n 3 locations within 5 km distance (3. 1 miles). If there are none, then 1 sample from milking animals in each of 3 areas between 5 - 8 km distant (3.1 - 5.0 miles): 1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3<2l.

1 Sample from milking animals at a control location 1 5 -

30 km distant (9.3 - 1 8.6 miles): 3G1.

SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY Continuous sampler operation with sample collection weekly or more frequently if required by dust loading Semi-monthly (when animals are on pasture)

Monthly (when animals are on pasture)

TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS Gross Beta I weekly Gamma isotopic analysis I quarterly composite lodine-1 31 / weekly Gamma scan I semi-monthly lodine-1 31 / semi-monthly Gamma scan I monthly lodine-1 31 / monthly

OJ I

co EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE

b. Well Water (Ground)

c. Potable Water (Drinking Water)

d. Vegetables TABLE 8-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be Monthly affected (although wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are not directly affected by plant operations, 3E1 farm's well, is sampled as management audit sample).

One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its discharge (no potable water samples are required as liquid effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS do not directly affect this pathway). However, for management audit samples, one raw and one treated sample from a public water supply (City of Salem Water and Sewer Department) is collected:

2F3.

Monthly (composited daily)

One sample of each principal class of food products from Annually (at harvest) area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged (the Delaware River at the location of SGS/HCGS is a brackish water source and is not used for irrigation of food products). Management audit samples are collected from various locations during harvest: 2F9, 1 G 1, 2G2 and 3H5. In addition, broad leaf vegetation (cabbage and collards) was collected from 1 0D1 and 1 G1 as well as being planted & collected onsite (1 S1, 7S1,

1 5S2, 1 6S1). This is in lieu of having a milk farm within 5 km (3. 1 miles) of the Sitec2>.

TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS Gamma scan I monthly Gross alpha I monthly Gross beta I monthly Tritium I monthly Gross alpha I monthly Gross beta I monthly Tritium I monthly Gamma scan I monthly lodine-1 31 I monthly Gamma scan I on collection

OJ I

0 EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE

e. Fodder Crops

f. Soil TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING AND NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, a sample of Annually (at harvest) crops normally used as cattle feed (silage) were collected from our m ilk farms as management audit samples: 14F4, 3G1, 2G3, 1 3E3.

Although not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of soil are collected as management audit samples: 6S2, 2F9, 5F1, 1 0D1, 1 6E1, 1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3, 3G1 (no samples collected in 2014).

Every 3 years (201 0-201 3-201 6)

4. AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT

a. Surface Water

b. Edible Fish One sample upstream: 1 F2.

One sample downstream: 7E1.

One sample outfall: 1 1A 1.

One sample cross-stream (mouth of Appoquinimink River):

12C1 <3l.

And an additional location in the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal: 1 6F1.

One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area: 1 1A 1.

One sample of same sgecies in area not influenced by plant discharge: 1 2C1 3l.

And an additional location downstream: 7E1.

Monthly Semi annually TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS Gamma scan I on collection Gamma scan I on collection Gamma scan I monthly Tritium I monthly**

Gamma scan (flesh) I on collection

OJ I

EXPOSURE PATHWAY AND/OR SAMPLE

c. Blue Crabs

d. Sediment TABLE 8-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS One sample of each commercially and recreationally important species in vicinity of plant discharge area 1 1A 1.

One sample of same species in area not influenced by plant discharge 1 2C1 <3J_

One sample from downstream area: 7E1.

One sample from cross-stream area and control location:

1 2C1 <3).

One sample from outfall area: 1 1A 1.

One sample from upstream, the C & D Canal: 1 6F1.

One sample from shoreline area: 6S2.

One sample from Cooling Tower Slowdown discharge:

1 5A1.

One sample south storm drain discharge line: 1 6A1.

SAMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY Semi annually Semi annually

Except for Dosimeters, the quarterly analysis is performed on a composite of individual samples collected during the quarter.

TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF ANALYSIS Gamma scan (flesh) /on collection Gamma scan I on collection

- Technical Specifications and ODCM require quarterly analysis but due to the tritium leak at Salem, it was decided to analyze surface waters on a monthly basis for tritium.

(1) Range of 3.4 - 6.4 miles based on ODCM Appendix E REMP Sample Locations Table and Figures (20686360).

(2) While these milk locations are not within the 5 km range, they are the closest farms in the Site vicinity.

Since broad leaf vegetation is acceptable in lieu of milk collections, LTS personnel planted and harvested cabbage at three locations on Site (1S1, 1 5S 1, 16S1) and one in Delaware (10D1).

(3) Station 1 2C1 was made the operational control (1975) for aquatic samples since the physical characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the upstream location originally chosen. This is due to the distance from Liston Point, which is the boundary between the Delaware River and Delaware Bay. As discussed extensively in the SGSIHCGS Pre-operational reports, the sampling locations further upstream show significantly lower background levels due to estuarine tidal flow.

MAP B-1 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ON-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS 9

B-1 2

MAP B-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM OFF-SITE SAMPLING LOCATIONS B-1 3

Intentionally left blank B-14

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES C-1

Intentionally left blank C-2

TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 SA-APT-1 4G1 (C) 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 1 14 +/- 24

< 28

< 2

< 1 04/02/14 - 06/30/14 1 06 +/- 23

< 29

< 2

< 2 06/30/1 4 - 09/29/1 4 88 +/- 21

< 29

< 2

< 2 09/29/14 -

12/29/14 95 +/- 26

< 25

< 2

< 2 AVERAGE*

101

+/- 22 SA-APT -1 5S2 12/30/13 - 04/02/14 91

+/- 29

< 28

< 2

< 2 04/02/14 - 06/30/14 1 39 +/- 33

< 27

< 2

< 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/14 82

+/- 28

< 25

< 2

< 2 09/29/14 -

12/29/14 67 +/- 26

< 28

< 2

< 'I AVERAGE' 95 +/- 62 SA-APT-16E1 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 106 +/- 30

< 12

< 1

< 1 04/02/14 - 06/30/14 96 +/- 28

< 35

< 2

< 1 06/30/14 - 09/29/14 99 +/- 29 32 +/- 15

< 2

< 2 09/29/1 4 -

12/29/14 84 +/- 24

< 27

< 1

< 1 AVERAGE*

96 +/- 1 8 32 +/- 0 SA-APT-1 F1 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 90 +/- 26

< 34

< 3

< 2 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/14 92

+/- 20

< 21

< 1

< 2 06/30/1 4 - 09/29/14 103 +/- 33

< 16

< 2

< 2 09/29/1 4 -

'1 2/29/14 74 +/- 39

< 46

< 2

< 3 AVERAGE*

90 +/- 24 SA-APT-2F6 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 101

+/- 26

< 24

< 2

< 1 04/02/14 - 06/30/14 122 +/- 28

< 31

< 2

< 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/14 1 1 3 +/- 34

< 30

< 2

< 2 09/29/14 -

12/29/14 94 +/- 27

< 26

< 2

< 1 AVERAGE*

108 +/- 25 SA-APT-5D1 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 1 16 +/- 22

< 12

< 1

< 1 04/02/14 - 06/30/14 105 +/- 31

< 15

< 2

< 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/14 89 +/- 39

< 14

< 2

< 2 09/29/14 -

12/29/14 87 +/- 36

< 34

< 2

< 2 AVERAGE*

99 +/- 28

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (G) CONTROL STATION C-3

TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCilm3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-APT-5S1 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 1 1 1 +/- 36

< 31

< 2

< 2 04/02/14 -

06/30/14 1 30 +/- 31

< 35

< 2

< 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/14 96 +/- 23

< 26

< 2

< 1 09/29/14 -

1 2/29/14 59 +/- 28

< 1 3

< 2

< 2 AVERAGE*

99 +/- 60 SA-APT-7S1 1 2/30/13 - 04/02/14 91 +/- 23

< 1 4

< 1

< 1 04/02/14 -

06/30/14 1 05 +/- 42

< 30

< 3

< 3 06/30/14 - 09/29/14 1 03 +/-

31

< 37

< 3

< 2 09/29/1 4 - 12/29/14 76 +/- 28

< 39

< 2

< 2 AVERAGE*

94 +/- 27

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-4

TABLE C*2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL GROUP I START STOP SA-APT-14G1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-581 SA-APT-781 1 2/30/13 - 01/06/14 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 01/06/14 - 01/1 3/14 17 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 22 +/- 4 01/13/14 - 01/20/14 17 +/- 4 1 6 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 1 9 +/- 4 01/20/14 - 01/27/14 1 4 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3

< 22

( 1 )

1 5 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 01/27/14 - 02/03/14 1 6 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 02/03/14 - 02/1 0/14 17 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 20 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 4 02/10/14 - 02/18/14 1 4 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 14 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 02/18/14 - 02/24/14 13 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 4 8 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 4 1 0 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 4 02/24/14 - 03/04/14 20 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 21 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 9 +/- 3 03/04/14 - 03/1 0/14 16 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 4 1 6 +/- 4 1 8 +/- 4 1 9 +/- 4 1 6 +/- 4 03/1 0/14 - 03/1 8/14 14 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 03/18/14 - 03/25/14 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 03/25/14 - 04/02/14 1 4 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 04/02/14 - 04/08/14 13 +/- 4 1 1 +/- 4 8 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 1 0 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 4 04/08/14 - 04/14/14 17 +/- 4 1 3 +/- 4 1 7 +/- 4 1 6 +/- 4 1 4 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 04/14/14 - 04/21/14 1 4 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 4 1 3 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 04/21/14 - 04/28/14 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 04/28/14 - 05/05/14 7 +/- 3 4 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 7 +/- 3 05/05/14 - 05/12/14 1 2 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 05/12/14 - 05/20/14 15 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 05/20/14 - 05/27/14 1 4 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 1 8 +/- 4 05/27/14 - 06/02/14 1 0 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 5 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 06/02/14 - 06/09/14 13 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 1 2 +/- 3 06/09/14 - 06/16/14 12 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 06/16/14 - 06/23/14 1 6 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3

'1 6 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 06/23/14 - 06/30/14 11 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 06/30/14 - 07/07/14 11 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 07/07/14.. 07/1 4/14 14 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 07/14/14 - 07/21/14 12 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 1 5 +/- 3 07/21/14 - 07/28/14 12 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 07/28/14 - 08/04/14 9 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 08/04/14 - 08/1 1/14 14 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 08/1 1/1 4 - 08/1 8/1 4 1 0 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 08/18/14 - 08/23/14 13 +/- 4

< 4 1 4 +/- 4 9 +/- 4 1 0 +/- 4 1 2 +/- 4 08/23/14 - 09/02/14 1 0 +/- 2 1 3 +/- 2 9 +/- 2 9 +/- 2 7 +/- 2 1 2 +/- 2 09/02/14 - 09/08/14 1 6 +/- 4 1 2 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 4 1 3 +/- 4 1 0 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 4 09/08/14 - 09/15/14 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 09/1 5/14 - 09/23/14 17 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 09/23/14 - 09/29/14 1 4 +/- 4 1 8 +/- 4 1 2 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 4 12 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 09/29/1 4 - 1 0/06/14 17 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 0/06/14 - 1 0/14/14 1 5 +/- 3 1 9 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 1 7 +/- 3 1 0/14/1 4 - 1 0/20/14 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 0/20/14 - 1 0/27/14 1 4 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 0/27/1 4 - 1 1/03/14 14 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 "1 3 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 1 1/03/14 - 1 1/1 0/14 18 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 1/1 0/14 - 1 1/1 7/14 13 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 1/1 7/14 - 1 1/24/14 16 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 1/24/14 - 12/01/14 13 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 12/01/14 - 12/08/14 15 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 12/08/14 - 12/1 5/14 18 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 12/1 5/14 - 12/22/"14 14 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 12/22/14 - 12/29/14 1 4 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 AVAERAGE*

14 +/- 5 1 3 +/- 6 1 3 +/- 6 1 3 +/- 7 1 2 +/- 7 1 3 +/- 6

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

( 1 ) Low sample volume C-5

TABLE C*2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results In Units of 1 E-3 pCi!m3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD GROUP I START STOP SA-APT-'1 5S2 SA-APT-16E1 12/30/13 - 01/06/1 4 1 5 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 01/06/14 - 01/1 3/1 4 1 9 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 01/1 3/14 - 01/20/14 1 6 +/- 5 1 0 +/- 3 01/20/14 - 01/27/14 20 +/- 3 28 +/- 4 01/27/14 - 02/03/14 1 7 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 02/03/14 - 02/1 0/1 4 1 8 +/- 3 24 +/- 4 02/1 0/14 - 02/1 8/14 15 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 02/1 8/14 - 02/24/14 15 +/- 4 1 1 +/- 3 02/24/14 - 03/04/14 19 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 03/04/14 - 03/1 0/14 17 +/- 4 1 7 +/- 4 03/10/14 - 03/18/1 4 1 4 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 03/18/14 - 03/25/14 14 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 03/25/14 - 04/02/14 14 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 04/02/14 - 04/08/14 12 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 04/08/14 - 04/14/14 1 8 +/- 4 1 6 +/- 4 04/14/14 - 04/21/14 1 2 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 04/21/14 - 04/28/14 12 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 04/28/14 - 05/05/14 7 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 05/05/14 - 05/12/14 15 +/- 3 1 5 +/- 3 05/1 2/14 - 05/20/1 4 1 5 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 05/20/14 - 05/27/14 12 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 05/27/14 - 06/02/14 8 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 4 06/02/14 - 06/09/14 1 0 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 06/09/14 - 06/16/14 8 +/- 3 1 0 +/- 3 06/'16/14 - 06/23/14 1 3 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 06/23/14 - 06/30/14 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 06/30/14 - 07/07/14 1 0 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 07/07/14 - 07/1 4/14 1 3 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 07/14/14 - 07/21/14 1 3 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 07/21/14 - 07/28/14 1 2 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 07/28/14 - 08/04/14 9 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 08/04/14 - 08/1 1/14 1 5 +/- 3 1 4 +/- 3 08/1 1/14 - 08/1 8/14 1 1 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 08/18/14 - 08/23/14 1 5 +/- 4 9 +/- 3 08/23/14 - 09/02/1 4 9 +/- 2 1 0 +/- 2 09/02/1 4 - 09/08/14 13 +/- 4 1 2 +/- 4 09/08/14 - 09/15/14 7 +/- 3 1 1 +/- 3 09/1 5/14 - 09/23/1 4 1 7 +/- 3 1 6 +/- 3 09/23/14 - 09/29/14 1 5 +/- 4 1 5 +/- 4 09/29/14 - 1 0/06/14 1 7 +/- 3 1 3 +/- 3 10/06/14 - 1 0/1 4/14 1 7 +/- 3 1 9 +/- 3 1 0/14/14 - 1 0/20/14 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 0/20/14 - 1 0/27/14 16 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 0/27/14 - 1 1/03/14 1 5 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 1/03/14 - 1 1/1 0/14 1 8 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 1/1 0/14 - 1 1/17/14 1 0 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 1/1 7/14 - 1 1/24/14 19 +/- 3 1 9 +/- 3 1 1 /24/14 - 1 2/01/14 12 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 1 2/01/14 - 1 2/08/14 1 8 +/- 3 1 8 +/- 3 12/08/14 - 1 2/1 5/14 1 6 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 12/15/14 - 1 2/22/14 16 +/- 3 1 7 +/- 3 12/22/14 - 1 2/29/1 4 1 1 +/- 3 1 2 +/- 3 AVAERAGE*

14 +/- 7 1 4 +/- 8

.,. THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-6

TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL GROUP I START STOP SA-AI0-14G1 SA-AI0-1 F1 SA-AI0-2F6 SA-AI0-501 SA-AI0-5S1 SA-AI0-7S1 1 2/30/13 - 01/06/14

< 37

< 28

< 30

< 27

< 35 01/06/14 - 01/13/14

< 53

< 38

< 40

< 44

< 39

< 48 01/1 3/14 - 01/20/14

< 45

< 30

< 28

< 32

< 27

< 40 01/20/14 - 01/27/14

< 50

< 1 9

< 65

< 21

< 18

< 50 01/27/14 - 02/03/14

< 20

< 22

< 20

< 24

< 21

< 1 9 02/03/14 - 02/10/14

< 23

< 27

< 32

< 28

< 24 02/10/14 - 02/18/14

< 52

< 42

< 52

< 42

< 58 02/1 8/14 - 02/24/14

< 38

< 43

< 38

< 44

< 37

< 40 02/24/14 - 03/04/14

< 30

< 26

< 27

< 24

< 35 03/04/14 - 03/10/14

< 26

< 35

< 32

< 31

< 30 03/10/14 - 03/18/1 4

< 23

< 26

< 30

< 25

< 27

< 26 03/18/14 - 03/25/14

< 53

< 42

< 49

< 45

< 58 03/25/14 - 04/02/14

< 25

< 24

< 23

< 21

< 26 04/02/1 4 - 04/08/14

< 46

< 37

< 39

< 37

< 34

< 46 04/08/14 - 04/14/14

< 46

< 34

< 32

< 30

< 45 04/1 4/1 4 - 04/21/1 4

< 39

< 37

< 33

< 39 04/21/14 - 04/28/14

< 27

< 26

< 27

< 28

< 26

< 28 04/28/14 - 05/05/14

< 39

< 32

< 31

< 27

< 39 05/05/14 - 05/12/14

< 29

< 25

< 28

< 23

< 33 05/1 2/14 - 05/20/14

< 36

< 37

< 34

< 37

< 34 05/20/14 - 05/2"1/1 4

< 34

< 35

< 32

< 29

< 35 05/27/14 - 06/02/1 4

< 60

< 45

< 42

< 45

< 43

< 60 06/02/14 - 06/09/14

< 51

< 69

< 66

< 69

< 56

< 49 06/09/14 - 06/16/1 4

< 45

< 48

< 46

< 50

< 45

< 43 06/16/14 - 06/23/1 4

< 40

< 33

< 37

< 36

< 39 06/23/14 - 06/30/14

< 33

< 25

< 23

< 28

< 37 06/30/14 - 07/07/1 4

< 20

< 21

< 20

< 1 8

< 1 8 07/07/14 - 07/14/14

< 46

< 36

< 37

< 36

< 46 07/14/14 - 07/21/14

< 33

< 32

< 33

< 31

< 31 07/21/14 - 07/28/1 4

< 37

< 47

< 42

< 41

< 37 07/28/14 - 08/04/14

< 39

< 33

< 29

< 32

< 31

< 37 08/04/14 - 08/1 1/14

< 31

< 29

< 32

< 28

< 31 08/1 1/14 - 08/1 8/14

< 50

< 41

< 42

< 45

< 43

< 45 08/1 8/14 - 08/23/14

< 67

< 64

< 65

< 67

< 64

< 64 08/23/14 - 09/02/14

< 41

< 34

< 36

< 34

< 38 09/02/14 - 09/08/14

< 61

< 55

< 57

< 59

< 58

< 61 09/08/14 - 09/15/14

< 41

< 43

< 42

< 39 09/15/14 - 09/23/14

< 36

< 28

< 29

< 28

< 35 09/23/14 - 09/29/14

< 44

< 37

< 40

< 39

< 47 09/29/14 - 1 0/06/14

< 28

< 23

< 26

< 25

< 27 1 0/06/14 - 1 0/14/14

< 32

< 31

< 33

< 34

< 44

< 34 1 0/1 4/14 - 1 0/20/14

< 1 3

< 1 2

< 1 3

< 1 2

< 1 3

< 1 3 1 0/20/14 - 1 0/27/14

< 37

< 38

< 39

< 40 1 0/27/14 - 1 1/03/14

< 27

< 29

< 31

< 27 1 1/03/14 - 1 1/10/14

< 36

< 31

< 29

< 30

< 35 1 1/1 0/1 4 - 1 1/17/14

< 38

< 42

< 40

< 43

< 38 1 1/1 7/14 - 1 1/24/14

< 67

< 65

< 64

< 66

< 68

< 66 1 1/24/14 - 1 2/01/14

< 60

< 50

< 47

< 45

< 50

< 62 1 2/01/14 - 1 2/08/14

< 22

< 39

< 37

< 21 1 2/08/14 - 1 2/15/14

< 25

< 21

< 20

< 21

< 20

< 27 1 2/15/14 - 1 2/22/1 4

< 1 4

< 33

< 31

< 32

< 30

< 1 4 1 2/22/14 - 1 2/29/14

< 47

< 30

< 28

< 27

< 47 AVERAGE

IODINE-1 31 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF ?OE-3 pCi/m3 C-7

TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD GROUP I START STOP SA-AI0-1 5S2 SA-AI0-16E1 1 2/30/13 - 01/06/14 01/06/14 - 01/1 3/14 01/1 3/14 - 01/20/14 01/20/1 4 - 01/27/1 4 01/27/1 4 - 02/03/14 02/03/14 - 02/1 0/14 02/1 0/14 - 02/1 8/14 02/18/14 - 02/24/14 02/24/14 - 03/04/14 03/04/14 - 03/1 0/14 03/10/14 - 03/1 8/1 4 03/18/14 - 03/25/14 03/25/1 4 - 04/02/14 04/02/14 - 04/08/14 04/08/14 - 04/1 4/14 04/14/14 - 04/21/14 04/21/14 - 04/28/14 04/28/1 4 - 05/05/14 05/05/14 - 05/12/14 05/1 2/14 - 05/20/14 05/20/14 - 05/27/14 05/27/1 4 - 06/02/14 06/02/14 - 06/09/14 06/09/14 - 06/1 6/14 06/1 6/14 - 06/23/1 4 06/23/14 - 06/30/14 06/30/14 - 07/07/14 07/07/14 - 07/1 4/14 07/14/14 - 07/21/14 07/21/14 - 07/28/14 07/28/14 - 08/04/14 08/04/14 - 08/1 1/14 08/1 1/14 - 08/1 8/14 08/18/14 - 08/23/14 08/23/14 - 09/02/1 4 09/02/14 - 09/08/14 09/08/14 - 09/1 5/14 09/1 5/14 - 09/23/14 09/23/14 - 09/29/14 09/29/14 - 10/06/14 1 0/06/14 - 10/1 4/14 1 0/1 4/14 - 1 0/20/14 1 0/20/14 - 10/27/14 1 0/27/14 - 1 1/03/1 4 1 1/03/14 - 1 1/10/14 1 1/10/14 - 1 1/1 7/14 1 1/1 7/14 - 1 1/24/14 1 1/24/14 - 12/01/14 1 2/01/14 - 12/08/14 1 2/08/14 - 12/1 5/14 1 2/1 5/14 - 12/22/1 4 1 2/22/14 - 12/29/14 AVERAGE

< 36

< 48

< 62

< 44

< 1 7

< 22

< 58

< 40

< 32

< 28

< 24

< 54

< 24

< 42

< 41

< 37

< 26

< 37

< 31

< 34

< 36

< 63

< 51

< 45

< 40

< 38

< 1 8

< 46

< 31

< 38

< 37

< 32

< 47

< 69

< 42

< 61

< 42

< 33

< 48

< 28

< 34

< 1 3

< 40

< 28

< 34

< 36

< 61

< 59

< 21

< 27

< 1 9

< 47

< 33

< 46

< 36

< 43

< 1 7

< 24

< 49

< 37

< 32

< 27

< 22

< 50

< 27

< 2

< 40

< 37

< 26

< 38

< 31

< 34

< 62

< 53

< 47

< 39

< 36

< 1 9

< 45

< 34

< 36

< 35

< 30

< 48

< 60

< 37

< 57

< 40

< 35

< 43

< 27

< 31

< 12

< 36

< 27

< 37

< 39

< 70

< 62

< 23

< 26

< 1 4

< 45

IODINE-1 31 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 70E-3 pCi/m3 C-8

TABLE C-4 DIRECT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS - QUARTERLY DOSIMITRY RESULTS*

Results in units of mR/standard quarter ANNUAL JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC STATION 10 DOSE SA-IDM-1§1u 139.6 46.4 M.2 82.7 32.3 SA-IDM-2S2 53.0 1 3.7 1 1.3 1 3.7 1 4.3 SA-IDM-2S4 64.8 1 8.7 1 5.1 15.7 1 5.3 SA-IDM-3S1 44.5 1 3.3 1 0.2 1 0.7 1 0.3 SA-IDM-4S1 49.8 1 3.3 1 2.4 1 2.7 1 1.4 SA-IDM-5S1 47.8 1 2.9 1 0.8 1 2.1 1 2.0 SA-IDM-6S2 65.8 1 8.7 1 4.0 16.7 16.4 SA-IDM-7S1 5 1.3 1 3.3 1 1.9 1 3.6 1 2.5 SA-IOM-8S1 40.9 1 1.7 9.1 9.1 1 1.0 SA-IOM-9S1 43.0 1 1.7 1 0.2 10.1 1 1.0 SA-IOM-10S1 46.2 1 1.7 1 1.9 1 1.1 1 1.5 SA-IDM-1 1S1 44.7 1 1.3 1 1.3 12.1 1 0.0 SA-IDM-1 2S1

54. 1 1 4.6 1 1.9 14.1 1 3.5 SA-IDM-1 3S1 60.3 1 6.2 1 4.0 1 3.6 1 6.5 SA-IOM-14S1 66.6 1 8.3 1 6.2 1 4.6 1 7.5 SA-IDM-1 5S1 47.9 1 2.5 1 1.3 12.1 1 2.0 SA-l OM-1 5S2 50.1 14.2 1 0.8 12.1 1 3.0 SA-IDM-16S1 55.3 1 5.8 1 2.9 1 3.6 1 3.0 SA-IOM-16S2**

1 55.0 42.4 36.0 39.6 37.0 SA-IDM-16S3 48.5 1 3.7 1 0.2 1 2.1 1 2.5 SA-IOM-402 58.6 1 5.8 1 5.7 1 5.6 1 1.5 SA-IDM-501 53.6 1 4.6 1 2.4 13.6 1 3.0 SA-IOM-1 001 57.4 1 5.8 1 2.4 14.9 1 4.3 SA-IDM-1401 51.2 1 4.2 1 0.8 1 1.9 1 4.3 SA-IDM-1 501 59.6 1 5.4 1 3.5 1 5.4 1 5. 3 SA-IDM-2E1 51.6 1 4.2 1 1.3 1 3.0 13.1 SA-IOM-3E1 50.1 1 3.7 1 0.8 1 2.5 13.1 SA-l OM-1 1 E2 61.5 1 8.3 1 3.5 1 4.9 1 4.8 SA-IOM-12E1 60.4 1 7.0 1 5.7 1 5.9 1 1.8 SA-IOM-1 3E1 49.8 12.9 1 0.2 1 2.4 1 4.3 SA-IOM-1 6E1 61.8 1 5.0 1 4.0 1 4.0 1 8.8 SA-IOM-1 F1 66.5 20.7 1 6.2 1 7.1 1 2.5 SA-IOM-2F2 54.7*

1 4.2 1 2.9 1 1.5 1 6.1 SA-IOM-2F5 54.9 1 5.4 1 2.9 1 4.5 1 2.1 SA-IOM-2F6 51.2 1 4.2 1 2.9 1 2.1 1 2.0 SA-IOM-3F2 52.0 1 4.6 1 1.3 1 3.5 1 2.6 SA-IOM-3F3 46.7 1 2.9 1 0.2 1 3.0 1 0.6 SA-IOM-4F2 5 1.6 1 3.3 1 0.8 1 3.5 1 4.0 SA-IOM-5F1 47.2 1 3.3 1 1.9 1 1.5 1 0.5 SA-IOM-6F1 45.7 1 2.5 1 0.2 1 0.0 1 3.0 SA-IOM-7F2 53.1 1 3.3 1 0.8 1 2.0 1 7.0 SA-IOM-8F1 61.8 1 6.6 1 4.0 1 4.9 1 6.3 SA-IOM-9F1 65.2 1 8.3 1 5.7 1 5.9 1 5.3 SA-IOM-1 OF2 56.6 1 5.0 1 2.4 1 3.9 1 5.3 SA-IOM-1 1 F1 61.8 1 6.6 1 4.0 1 5.9 1 5.3 SA-IOM-12F1 58.6 1 5.4 1 3.5 1 4.9 1 4.8 SA-l DM-1 3F2 53.7 1 6.2 1 1.3 1 3.4 1 2.8 SA-l OM-1 3F3 58.8 1 6.2 1 2.9 1 4.9 1 4.8 SA-IOM-1 3F4 62.3 1 6.6 1 4.0 1 6.4 1 5.3 SA-IDM-14F2 66.0 1 7.8 1 4.0 1 6.4 1 7.8 SA-IOM-1 5F3 64.9 1 6.6 1 4.6 1 6.9 1 6.8 SA-IOM-1 6F2 52.5 1 5.0 1 1.3 1 3.4 1 2.8 SA-IOM-1 G3 (C) 54.6 1 5.0 1 1.9 1 2.9 1 4.8 SA-IOM-3G1 (C) 59.0 1 5.4 1 4.0 1 5.1 1 4.5 SA-IOM-1 OG1 (C; 59.8 1 6.2 1 2.9 1 5.4 1 5.3 SA-IOM-1 4G1 (C; 61.7 1 7.0 1 5.7 1 4.5 1 4.5 SA-IDM-16G1 (C; 54.8 1 7.0 1 2.4 1 2.9 1 2.5 SA-IOM-3H 1 (C) 45.6 1 2.9 1 0.2 1 1.0 1 1.5

QUARTERLY ELEMENT TLO RESULTS BY MIRION

- SAMPLE RESULTS ARE AFFECTED BY THE ISFSI (C) CONTROL STATION C-9

TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-131* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD

<----------GAMMA EMITTERS---------->

STATION ID START STOP 1-1 31 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-1 3E3 01/05/1 4 " 01l06/14

< 0.7 1251 +/- 1 63

< 7

< 9

< 12

< 1 60 SA-MLK-14F4 01/05/14 " 01/06/14

< 1.0 1 579 +/- 1 94

< 6

< 9

< 1 3

< 1 93 SA-MLK-2G3 01/05/14 " 01/06/14

< 0.8 1230 +/- 1 62

< 7

< 1 0

< 1 68 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 01/05/14 -

01/06/14

< 0.9 1346 +/- 1 95

< 6

< 9

< 1 3

< 201 SA-MLK-1 3E3 02/09/14 -

02/1 0/14

< 0.9 1 429 +/- 1 1 3

< 4

< 5

< 8

< 129 SA-MLK-*14F4 02/09/14 -

02/1 0/14

< 0.9 1294 +/- 1 1 3

< 5

< 7

< 1 0

< 1 39 SA-MLK-2G3 02/09/14 " 02/1 0/14

< 0.8 1 1 94 +/- 123

< 5

< 8

< 123 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 02/09/14 -

02/1 0/14

< 0.9 1341 +/- 1 42

< 5

< 1 0

< 1 12 SA-MLK-1 3E3 03/09/14 -

03/1 0/14

< 0.7 1299 +/- 1 69

< 5

< 6

< 1 1

< 1 41 SA-MLK-1 4F4 03/09/14 -

03/1 0/14

< 0.7 1 358 +/- 1 50

< 6

< 12

< 1 39 SA-MLK-2G3 03/09/14 -

03/1 0/14

< 0.8 1259 +/- 1 80

< 7

< 1 0

< 200 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 03/09/1 4 -

03/1 0/14

< 0.7 1290 +/- 1 42

< 6

< 7

< 1 79 SA-MLK-1 3E3 04/06/14 -

04/07/14

< 0.4 1 382 +/- 99

< 4

< 5

< 83 SA-MLK-1 4F4 04/06/14 -

04/07/14

< 0.5 1 327 +/- 93

< 4

< 5

< 93 SA-MLK-2G3 04/06/14 -

04/07/14

< 0.5 1 323 +/- 84

< 3

< 4

< 5

< 88 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/06/1 4 -

04/07/14

< 0.4 1272 +/- 1 08

< 3

< 4

< 6

< 78 SA-MLK-1 3E3 04/20/14 " 04/21/14

< 0.7 1252 +/- 1 38

< 6

< 1 0

< 1 50 SA-MLK-1 4F4 04/20/14 " 04/21/14

< 0.7 1293 +/- 1 68

< 6

< 7

< 1 1

< 1 35 SA-MLK-2G3 04/20/1 4 " 04/21/14

< 0.7 1 1 60 +/- 1 30

< 5

< 7

< 1 1

< 1 54 SA-MLK*3G1 (C) 04/20/14 " 04/21/14

< 0.6 1216 +/- 123

< 6

< 7

< 1 55 SA-MLK-1 3E3 05/04/1 4 " 05/05/14

< 0.7 1233 +/- 1 33

< 5

< 8

< 1 24 SA-MLK-14F4 05/04/14 " 05/05/14

< 0.7 1460 +/- 1 50

< 6

< 12

< 1 65 SA-MLK-2G3 05/04/14 " 05/05/14

< 0.7 1267 +/- 1 15

< 4

< 7

< 1 04 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/04/14 " 05/05/14

< 0.7 1 378 +/- 128

< 7

< 8

< 12

< 207 SA-MLK-1 3E3 05/19/14 " 05/20/14

< 0.6 1 333 +/- 1 01

< 4

< 5

< 6

< 1 00 SA-MLK-14F4 05/19/14 " 05/20/14

< 0.7 1 304 +/- 1 1 0

< 4

< 5

< 7

< 1 1 5 SA-MLK-2G3 05/19/14 " 05/20/14

< 0.6 1 305 +/- 76

< 3

< 82 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/1 9/14 " 05/20/14

< 0.7 1281 +/- 1 05

< 4

< 6

< 1 13 SA-MLK-1 3E3 06/01/1 4 -

06/02/14

< 0.4 1415 +/- 56

< 2

< 4

< 50 SA-MLK-1 4F4 06/01/14 -

06/02/14

< 0.4 1 41 6 +/- 57

< 2

< 3

< 5

< 64 SA-MLK-2G3 06/01/14 " 06/02/14

< 0.5 1295 +/- 41

< 1

< 2

< 38 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/01/1 4 -

06/02/14

< 0.4 1 344 +/- 44

< 2

< 3

< 46 SA-MLK-1 3E3 06/15/14 " 06/1 6/14

< 0.4 1256 +/- 1 30

< 4

< 6

< 1 34 SA-MLK-14F4 06/15/14 " 06/1 6/14

< 0.4 1 280 +/- 1 1 3

< 6

< 7

< 1 42 SA-MLK-2G3 06/15/14 " 06/1 6/14

< 0.4 1 302 +/- 128

< 4

< 5

< 7

< 1 25 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/1 5/14 " 06/1 6/14

< 0.4 1298 +/- 1 1 8

< 5

< 6

< 8

< 1 15 SA-MLK-1 3E3 07/06/14 -

07/07/14

< 0.4 1 505 +/- 125

< 4

< 5

< 7

< 121 SA-MLK-1 4F4 07/06/14 " 07/07/14

< 0.4 1 385 +/- 97

< 4

< 6

< 1 05 SA-MLK-2G3 07/06/14 " 07/07/14

< 0.4 1 1 85 +/- 83

< 3

< 4

< 96 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/06/14 -

07/07/14

< 0.4 1 309 +/- 96

< 5

< 6

< 7

< 1 37

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L (C) CONTROL STATION C-1 0

TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD

<----------GAMMA EMITTERS---------->

STATION ID START STOP 1-1 31 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-1 40 Ra-226 SA-MLK-1 3E3 07/20/14 - 07/21/14

< 0.4 1313 +/- 1 34

< 6

< 7

< 1 0

< 155 SA-MLK-14F4 07/20/14 - 07/21/14

< 0.4 1413 +/- 147

< 6

< 1 0

< 154 SA-MLK-2G3 07/20/14 - 07/21/14

< 0.4 1 350 +/- 1 43

< 6

< 8

< 160 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/20/14 - 07/21/14

< 0.4 1 1 39 +/- 1 25

< 4

< 5

< 6

< 121 SA-MLK-1 3E3 08/03/14 - 08/04/14

< 0.3 1 321 +/- 1 51

< 6

< 7

< 1 3

< 166 SA-MLK-1 4F4 08/03/14 - 08/04/14

< 0.4 1 308 +/- 1 43

< 7

< 12

< 150 SA-MLK-2G3 08/03/14 - 08/04/14

< 0.3 1 1 90 +/- 1 25

< 4

< 6

< 8

< 127 SA-Ml.K-3G1 (C) 08/03/14 - 08/04/14

< 0.3 1 367 +/- 1 43

< 5

< 6

< 1 0

< 1 35 SA-MLK-1 3E3 08/1 7/14 - 08/1 8/14

< 0.7 1 585 +/- 1 79

< 7

< 1 0

< 1 87 SA-MLK-1 4F4 08/17/14 - 08/1 8/14

< 0.7 1 525 +/- 1 48

< 5

< 6

< 1 33 SA-MLK-2G3 08/1 7/14 - 08/1 8/14

< 0.7 1 370 +/- 1 1 8

< 4

< 5

< 123 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 08/1 7/14 - 08/1 8/14

< 0.7 1 364 +/- 1 36

< 5

< 6

< 121 SA-MLK-1 3E3 09/01/14 - 09/02/14

< 0.7 1512 +/- 1 41

< 5

< 6

< 1 1

< 155 SA-MLK-14F4 09/01/14 - 09/02/14

< 0.5 1 476 +/- 1 47

< 6

< 1 2

< 156 SA-MLK-2G3 09/01/14 - 09/02/14

< 0.6 1 336 +/- 1 84

< 7

< 8

< 1 4

< 208 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/01/1 4 - 09/02/14

< 0.5 1 371 +/- 1 27

< 5

< 6

< 8

< 1 39 SA-MLK**1 3E3 09/22/1 4 - 09/23/14

< 0.6 1 283 +/- 1 86

< 6

< 7

< 1 5

< 1 72 SA-MLK-1 4F4 09/22/1 4 - 09/23/14

< 0.6 1 269 +/- 148

< 5

< 1 2

< 1 64 SA-MLK-2G3 09/22/1 4 - 09/23/14

< 0.7 1437 +/- 1 69

< 7

< 6

< 1 5

< 1 83 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/22/14 - 09/23/14

< 0.5 1217 +/- 1 60

< 4

< 1 4

< 141 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/14

< 0.3 1314 +/- 1 97

< 7

< 10

< 1 1

< 242 SA-MLK-14F4 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/14

< 0.3 1449 +/- 1 62

< 6

< 7

< 1 0

< 1 62 SA-MLK-2G3 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/14

< 0.3 1 151 +/- 1 36

< 5

< 6

< 1 0

< 125 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/14

< 0.3 1 294 +/- 1 92

< 8

< 9

< 1 4

< 1 83 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/14

< 0.8 1 496 +/- 1 59

< 6

< 1 3

< 1 39 SA-ML.K-14F4 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/14

< 0.4 1317 +/- 146

< 6

< 7

< 1 4

< 166 SA-MLK-2G3 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/14

< 0.5 1 422 +/- 144

< 5

< 6

< 15

< 1 37 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/14

< 0.8 1 061 +/- 1 72

< 7

< 9

< 150 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 1/09/14 - 1 1/1 0/14

< 0.4 1 427 +/- 63

< 4

< 5

< 79 SA-ML.K-14F4 1 1/09/14 - 1 1/1 0/14

< 0.3 1517 +/- 62

< 2

< 3

< 4

< 64 SA-ML.K-2G3 1 1/09/14 - 1 1/1 0/14

< 0.3 1440 +/- 72

< 3

< 4

< 73 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1 1/09/14 - 1 1/1 0/14

< 0.4 1 430 +/- 64

< 2

< 4

< 47 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 1/1 6/14 - 1 1/1 7/14

< 0.8 1 308 +/- 1 1 1

< 5

< 12

< 1 03 SA-MLK-14F4 1 1/1 6/14 - 1 1/1 7/14

< 0.5 1402 +/- 147

< 5

< 6

< 1 3

< 1 37 SA-ML.K-2G3 1 1/1 6/14 - 1 1/1 7/14

< 0.8 1 279 +/- 1 1 5

< 4

< 5

< 14

< 1 1 6 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1 1/1 6/14 - 1 1/1 7/14

< 0.8 1 302 +/- 156

< 9

< 8

< 1 3

< 248 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 2/07/14 - 1 2/08/14

< 0.4 1440 +/- 102

< 4

< 5

< 9

< 120 SA-MLK-14F4 12/07/14 - 1 2/08/14

< 0.4 1 387 +/- 123

< 4

< 5

< 1 1

< 1 1 6 SA-MLK-2G3 1 2/07/14 - 1 2/08/14

< 0.4 1 552 +/- 142

< 6

< 1 1

< 1 65 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1 2/07/14 - 1 2/08/14

< 0.7 1 281 +/- 106

< 4

< 8

< 1 22 ANNUAL AVERAGE 1 338 +/- 129

IODINE-1 31 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L (C) CONTROL STATION C-1 1

TABLE C-6 STATION ID SA-WWA-3E1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN WELL WATER*

Results in units of pCi/liter +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD START STOP Gr-A Gr-B H-3 01/27/14 - 01/27/14

< 0.6

< 1.9

< 1 77 02/24/14 - 02/24/14

< 1.3

< 1.6

< 168 03/1 8/1 4 - 03/1 8/14

< 1.5

< 1.7

< 1 73 04/1 4/1 4 - 04/14/14

< 1.4

< 2.6

< 149 05/27/14 - 05/27/14

< 2.1

< 2.9

< 1 94 06/23/14 - 06/23/14

< 0.4

< 1.4

< 1 96 07/28/14 - 07/28/14

< 1.8

< 2.5

< 1 69 08/1 8/14 - 08/1 8/14

< 1.4

< 2.3

< 1 63 09/23/14 - 09/23/14

< 3.0

< 2.5

< 1 80 1 0/20/14 - 10/20/14

< 1.6

< 2.4

< 1 58 1 1/17/14 - 1 1/1 7/14

< 1.6

< 2.4

< 1 77 12/1 8/14 - 12/1 8/14

< 1.7

< 2.6

< 1 95 AVERAGE**

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUI RED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-1 2

TABLE C-7 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER*

Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD

<--GAMMA EMITTERS-->

STATION ID START STOP 1-131**

K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 BaLa140 Ra-226 SA-WWA-3E1 01/27/14 - 01/27/14

< 0.7

< 52

< 6

< 1 4

< 7

< 1 3

< 6

< 5

< 7

< 1 0

< 1 20 02/24/14 - 02/24/14

< 0.8

< 34

< 4

< 8

< 4

< 7

< 4

< 3

< 4

< 7

< 121 03/18/14 - 03/18/14

< 0.5

< 76

< 7

< 9

< 1 5

< 8

< 1 8

< 8

< 7

< 6

< 1 5

< 1 61 04/14/14 - 04/14/14

< 0.5

< 86

< 4

< 5

< 9

< 5

< 9

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 9

< 136 05/27/14 - 05/27/14

< 1.0

< 35

< 4

< 5

< 1 0

< 4

< 9

< 4

< 6

< 1 22 06/23/14 - 06/23/14

< 0.4

< 73

< 4

< 8

< 4

< 7

< 5

< 4

< 7

< 1 1 3 07/28/14 - 07/28/14

< 0.5

< 99

< 5

< 1 1

< 5

< 1 2

< 6

< 5

< 1 0

< 1 32 08/1 8/14 - 08/18/14

< 0.4

< 28

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 75 09/23/14 - 09/23/14

< 0.6

< 35

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 95 1 0/20/14 - 1 0/20/14

< 0.6

< 59

< 8

< 6

< 1 3

< 8

< 14

< 7

< 6

< 7

< 1 1

< 141 1 1/17/14 - 1 1/1 7/14

< 0.7

< 24

< 1

< 2

< 3

< 2

< 3

< 2

< 1

< 2

< 4

< 42 1 2/18/14 - 1 2/18/14

< 0.4

< 58

< 3

< 7

< 4

< 7

< 4

< 3

< 7

< 94 0

AVERAGE**

I

(...)

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-8 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER (2F3)

Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP GR-A GR-B H-3 RAW 01/01/14 - 01/31/14

< 2.1 5.0 +/- 1.9

< 1 78 02/01/14 - 02/28/14

< 2.0 6.8 +/- 2.2

< 1 77 03/01/14 - 03/31/14

< 1.7

< 3.0

< 1 68 04/01/1 4 " 04/30/14

< 2.0

< 3.3

< 1 75 05/05/14

06/02/14

< 2.3 5.1 +/- 2.2

< 1 68 06/01/14 - 06/30/14

< 2.1 3.5 +/- 1.9

< 1 89 07/01/14 - 07/31/14

< 2.3 5.6 +/- 2.2

< 1 90 08/01/14 - 09/02/14

< 2.6 6.9 +/- 2.5

< 1 75 09/02/1 4 - 09/30/14

< 1.8 6.1 +/- 2.5

< 1 83 09/30/14 - 1 1/03/14

< 0.9 5.3 +/- 2.0

< 1 81 1 1/03/14 - 12/01/1 4

< 3.0 3.9 +/- 1.8

< 1 80 1 2/01/14 - 12/29/14

< 0.9 4.3 +/- 1.9

< 1 77 AVERAGE*

5.2 +/- 2.3 TREATED 01/01/14 - 01/31/1 4

< 2.8 4.1 +/- 1.5

< 1 76 02/01/14 - 02/28/14

< 1. 1 5. 8 +/- 1.5

< 1 75 03/01/14 - 03/31/14

< 1.5 4.5 +/- 1.9

< 1 75 04/01/14 - 04/30/14

< 1.5 3.0 +/- 1.8

< 1 71 05/05/14 - 06/02/14

< 2.2 5.6 +/- 2.1

< 1 68 06/01/14 - 06/30/14

< 2.0 4.9 +/- 1.9

< 1 93 07/01/14 - 07/31/14

< 2.2 8.1 +/- 2.3

< 1 91 08/01/14 - 09/02/14

< 2.4 7.7 +/- 2.4

< 1 79 09/02/14 - 09/30/14

< 1.8 7.9 +/- 2.6

< 1 83 09/30/14 - 1 1/03/1 4

< 0.9 5.7 +/- 1.9

< 1 85 1 1/03/14 - 12/01/14

< 2.9 5.4 +/- 1.9

< 1 83 1 2/01/14 - 12/29/1 4

< 0.9 3.5 +/- 1.8

< 1 74 AVERAGE*

5.5 +/- 3.4

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-14

()

I 01 TABLE C-9 STATION ID SA-PWR:;2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 SA-PWR-2F3 SA-PWT-2F3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER {2F3)

Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD START STOP

<--GAMMA EMITTERS-->

0170lT14--Cf1731/14 01/01/14 01/31/14 02/01/14 02/28/14 02/01/14 02/28/14 03/01/14 03/31/14 03/01/14 03/31/14 04/01/14 04/30/14 04/01/14 04/30/14 05/05/14 06/02/14 05/05/14 06/02/14 06/01/14 06/30/14 06/01/14 06/30/14 07/01/14 07/31/14 07/01/14 07/31/14 08/01/14 09/02/14 08/01/14 09/02/14 09/02/14 09/30/14 09/02/14 09/30/14 09/30/14 1 1/03/14 09/30/14 1 1/03/14 1 1/03/14 12/01 /14 1 1/03/14 1 2/01/14 12/01/14 1 2/29/14 1 2/01/14 1 2/29/14 AVERAGE 1-131

< 0.7

< 0.8

< 0.7

< 0.4

< 0.8

< 0.7

< 0.4

< 0.3

< 0.5

< 0.9

< 0.4

< 0.6

< 0.7

< 0.4

< 0.5

< 0.4

< 0.6

< 0.6 K-40

< 68

< 33

< 55

< 89

< 41

< 99

< 31

< 1 1

< 44

< 56

< 50

< 94

< 40

< 44

< 37

< 40

< 44

< 51

< 59

< 40

< 45

< 58

< 85

< 29 Mn-54

< 4

< 6

< 5

< 4

< 1

< 5

< 6

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 3

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 3

< 4 Co-58

< 4

< 7

< 5

< 1

< 6

< 7

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 6

< 4

< 6

< 4

< 4 Fe-59

< 1 0

< 1 3

< 1 2

< 8

< 3

< 1 1

< 1 5

< 1 1

< 9

< 7

< 9

< 1 1

< 8

< 1 0

< 8

< 1 0

< 1 1

< 7

< 7 Co-60

< 5

< 3

< 6

< 5

< 4

< 1

< 5

< 8

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 6

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 6

< 3

< 4 Zn-65

< 1 0

< 8

< 1 3

< 8

< 1 0

< 9

< 3

< 2

< 9

< 1 1

< 1 0

< 8

< 1 1

< 9

< 1 0

< 9

< 1 0

< 7

< 1 0

< 1 2

< 1 0

< 6

< 7 ZrNb-95 Cs-134

< 5

< 4

< 6

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 2

< 1

< 6

< 7

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 6

< 4

< 6

< 7

< 4

< 5

< 6

< 4

< 6

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 6

< 4

< 4 IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L.

Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226

< 5-

< 9

< 1 1 6

< 4

< 8

< 1 1 3

< 6

< 1 2

< 1 03

< 5

< 8

< 1 37

< 4

< 8

< 1 1 1

< 5

< 8

< 1 27

< 1

< 4

< 39

< 1

< 3

< 31

< 7

< 6

< 4

< 6

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 5

< 6

< 4

< 8

< 1 0

< 8

< 4

< 7

< 6

< 7

< 9

< 8

< 7

< 8

< 9

< 1 3

< 5

< 7

< 1 33

< 1 76

< 1 13

< 1 14

< 1 1 7

< 151

< 1 0 1

< 1 1 8

< 1 1 9

< 1 1 2

< 1 21

< 1 50

< 1 89

< 1 08

< 80

TABLE C-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES Results in units of pCi!kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE

<----GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION 10 P ERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPV-2F9*

05/1 1/14 Asparagus

< 1 22 2531 +/- 3 1 1

< 23

< 1 5

< 1 3

< 375

< 61 SA-FPV-1G1* (C) 05/19/14 Asparagus

< 69 2926 +/- 1 62

< 25

< 6

< 7

< 1 74

< 29 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 05/19/14 Asparagus

< 1 1 1 2016 +/- 262

< 39

< 1 1

< 274

< 52 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 05/19/14 Asparagus

< 70 3267 +/- 1 59

< 27

< 7

< 8

< 1 66

< 29 AVERAGE**

2685 +/- 1 076 SA-FPL-10D1 06/30/14 Cabbage

< 87 3635 +/- 21 1

< 21

< 10

< 12

< 232

< 43 SA-FPL-1 OD1 06/30114 Collards

< 1 78 4977 +/- 325

< 40

< 22

< 400

< 82 SA-FPL-15S2 06/30/14 Cabbage

< 58 4349 +/- 1 72

< 1 6

< 6

< 7

< 1 46

< 25 SA-FPL-16S1 06!30/14 Cabbage

< 49 4607 +/- 1 59

< 1 3

< 5

< 6

< 1 04

< 24 SA-FPL-1 6S1 06/30/14 Collards

< 62 6784 +/- 210

< 17

< 7

< 1 38

< 28 SA-FPL-1S1 06/30/14 Cabbage

< 1 1 7 5342 +/- 303

< 26

< 1 3

< 1 5

< 212

< 57 SA-FPL-1S1 06/30/14 Collards

< 1 03 5857 +/- 253

< 24

< 1 1

< 1 3

< 260

< 43 SA-FPL-7S2 06/30114 Cabbage

< 96 5968 +/- 264

< 23

< 1 0

< 1 1

< 236

< 44 0

SA-FPL-7S2 06/30/14 Collards

< 53 641 0 +/- 1 68

< 1 5

< 5

< 6

< 1 51

< 25 I

0)

AVERAGE**

5325 +/- 2055 SA-FPV-2F9*

07/24!14 Corn

< 94 1 655 +/- 1 94

< 1 5

< 1 0

< 9

< 242

< 36 SA-FPV-2F9*

07/24/14 Tomatoes

< 90 1 892 +/- 244

< 1 6

< 9

< 1 0

< 277

< 44 SA-FPV-2F9 07/24114 Peaches

< 1 1 0 2295 +/- 280

< 22

< 1 1

< 14

< 304

< 48 SA-FPV-10D1*

07/30/14 Cabbage

< 286 4322 +/- 512

< 52

< 25

< 30

< 649

< 1 16 SA-FPV-1 OD1*

07/30/14 Collards 256 +/- 1 48 421 3 +/- 373

< 31

< 1 5

< 1 8

< 390

< 67 SA-FPV-15F4*

07/30/14 Corn

< 1 53 2250 +/- 255

< 26

< 1 8

< 1 6

< 379

< 56 SA-FPV-15F4*

07/30/1 4 Peppers

< 1 36 2283 +/- 234

< 28

< 1 6

< 1 5

< 367

< 50 SAFPV-15F4*

07/30/14 Tomatoes

< 1 32 2320 +/- 328

< 25

< 1 4

< 1 7

< 322

< 74 SA-FPV-15S2*

07/30/14 Cabbage

< 215 4913 +/- 367

< 48

< 27

< 24

< 557

< 90 SA-FPV-16S1*

07/30/14 Cabbage

< 1 80 4453 +/- 435

< 37

< 1 8

< 1 9

< 407

< 81 SA-FPV-16S1*

07/30/14 Collards

< 1 22 4952 +/- 276

< 26

< 1 4

< 14

< 284

< 54 SA-FPV-1G1* (C) 07/30/14 Corn

< 264 1 626 +/- 452

< 51

< 31

< 29

< 742

< 1 15 SA-FPV-1G1* (C) 07/30/14 Collards

< 232 2262 +/- 378

< 45

< 29

< 26

< 626

< 96 SA-FPV-1G1* (C) 07/30/14 Tomatoes

< 161 2692 +/- 357

< 28

< 1 7

< 1 8

< 415

< 85 SA-FPV-1S1" 07/30/14 Cabbage

< 259 4563 +/- 528

< 57

< 30

< 675

< 1 01 SA-FPV-1S1*

07/30/14 Collards

< 277 3943 +/- 525

< 60

< 32

< 33

< 709

< 1 24 MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUI RED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 0 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE

<-----GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-1 31 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 07/30/14 Corn

< 1 39 1 976 +/- 299

< 30

< 1 6

< 1 5

< 422

< 66 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 07/30/14 Peppers

< 241 301 8 +/- 374

< 51

< 29

< 27

< 657

< 1 01 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 07/30/14 Tomatoes

< 1 70 2576 +/- 335

< 34

< 1 9

< 486

< 73 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 07/30/14 Corn

< 141 1 940 +/- 309

< 24

< 1 1

< 1 6

< 322

< 41 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 07/30/14 Peppers

< 293 2299 +/- 453

< 47

< 25

< 29

< 688

< 1 1 6 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 07/30/14 Tomatoes

< 96 1 639 +/- 1 87

< 20

< 1 2

< 269

< 46 SA-FPL-7S2 07/30/14 Cabbage

< 245 4729 +/- 5 1 1

< 48

< 21

< 26

< 466

< 1 1 8 SA-FPL-7S2 07/30/14 Collards

< 1 85 6457 +/- 439

< 43

< 23

< 25

< 485

< 87 AVERAGE**

256 +/- 0 3 1 36 +/- 2732 SA-FPV-3F8 08/08/14 Peaches

< 1 1 5 2449 +/- 264

< 32

< 1 0

< 12

< 308

< 43 SA-FPV-2F9 08/10/14 Peaches

< 1 01 2594 +/- 262

< 24

< 1 1

< 1 2

< 277

< 48 SA-FPL-10D1 08/21/14 Cabbage

< 223 2555 +/- 425

< 35

< 23

< 29

< 554

< 1 02 SA-FPL-1 OD1 08/21/14 Collards

< 326 3971 +/- 523

< 48

< 35

< 851

< 1 34 0

SA-FPL-15S2 08/21/14 Cabbage

< 1 87 321 8 +/- 467

< 31

< 20

< 21

< 514

< 87 I

SA-FPL-1 5S2 08/21/14 Collards

< 387 4148 +/- 659

< 59

< 41

< 44

< 885

< 1 59

-...j SA-FPL-16S1 08/21/1 4 Cabbage

< 1 60 2495 +/- 41 1

< 27

< 1 8

< 23

< 404

< 79 SA-FPL -1 6S1 08/21/1 4 Collards

< 208 3808 +/- 508

< 35

< 21

< 25

< 523

< 1 04 SA-FPL-1S1 08/21/1 4 Cabbage

< 228 2692 +/- 372

< 35

< 26

< 25

< 600

< 91 SA-FPL-1S 1 08/21/14 Collards

< 1 89 4033 +/- 509

< 31

< 20

< 23

< 570

< 85 SA-FPL-7S2 08/21/1 4 Cabbage

< 1 99 2863 +/- 444

< 35

< 23

< 25

< 523

< 1 06 SA-FPL-7S2 08/21/14 Collards

< 1 82 3127 +/- 478

< 27

< 1 6

< 1 7

< 456

< 76 AVERAGE**

3 1 63 +/- 1 3 1 6 SA-FPL-1 0D1 09/30/14 Collards

< 1 83 3356 +/- 380

< 48

< 1 5

< 1 7

< 432

< 66 SA-FPL-15S2 09/30/14 Cabbage

< 1 90 4024 +/- 386

< 47

< 1 7

< 1 9

< 433

< 73 SA-FPL-15S2 09/30/14 Collards

< 87 5146 +/- 376

< 23

< 8

< 1 0

< 1 32

< 34 SA-FPL-16S1 09/30/14 Cabbage

< 1 49 3085 +/- 353

< 55

< 1 4

< 1 7

< 394

< 61 SA-FPL-16S1 09/30/14 Collards

< 1 55 4681

+/- 389

< 60

< 1 6

< 558

< 69 SA-FPL-1S1 09/30/14 Cabbage

< 151 2253 +/- 282

< 47

< 1 2

< 325

< 42 SA-FPL-1S1 09/30/14 Collards

< 1 87 3878 +/- 439

< 56

< 1 7

< 22

< 477

< 74 SA-FPL-7S2 09/30/14 Cabbage

< 1 52 2938 +/- 412

< 37

< 1 4

< 1 6

< 328

< 66 SA-FPL-7S2 09/30/14 Collards

< 203 4912 +/- 483

< 57

< 1 6

< 1 9

< 402

< 73 AVERAGE**

3808 +/- 1 965 MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

()

I

ex>

TABLE C-10 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE STATION ID PERIOD TYPE Be-7 SA-FPL-1 OD1 1 0/27/14 Collards 209 +/- 74 SA-FPL-15S2 1 0/27/14 Cabbage 210 +/- 1 01 SA-FPL-16S1 1 0/27/14 Cabbage

< 1 02 SA-FPL-16S1 1 0/27/14 Collards

< 70 SA-FPL-1S1 1 0/27/14 Cabbage

< 124 SA-FPL-1S1 1 0/27/14 Collards 270 +/- 168 SA-FPL-7S2 10/27/14 Cabbage 324 +/- 1 61 SA-FPL-7S2 1 0/27/14 Collards

< 223 AVERAGE**

253 +/- 1 10 SA-FPL-10D1 1 1/19/14 Collards 363 +/- 86 SA-FPL-15S2 1 1/19/14 Cabbage

< 1 36 SA-FPL-16S1 1 1/19/14 Cabbage 179 +/- 1 02 SA-FPL-16S1 1 1/19/14 Collards 201 +/- 94 SA-FPL-1S1 1 1/19/14 Cabbage 279 +/- 1 47 SA-FPL-1S1 1 1/19/14 Collards 1 95 +/- 98 SA-FPL-782 1 1/19/14 Cabbage

< 123 SA-FPL-7S2 1 1/19/14 Collards 216 +/- 97 AVERAGE**

239 +/- 1 40 MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM K-40 3366 +/- 210 2549 +/- 214 2340 +/- 235 3785 +/- 224 1 970 +/- 354 4299 +/- 412 4485 +/- 339 4260 +/- 373 3382 +/- 1 966 4195 +/- 222 2607 +/- 302 2751 +/- 243 4064 +/- 255 3572 +/- 321 4335 +/- 259 2900 +/- 283 4620 +/- 297 3631 +/- 1 575 GAMMA EMITTERS 1-131 Cs-134

< 27

< 8

< 27

< 8

< 31

< 8

< 26

< 7

< 57

< 1 5

< 56

< 1 5

< 53

< 1 5

< 60

< 1 9

< 41

< 9

< 59

< 14

< 54

< 1 2

< 46

< 9

< 58

< 14

< 47

< 1 1

< 54

< 14

< 38

< 1 0

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232

< 9

< 212

< 33

< 10

< 166

< 33

< 10

< 239

< 43

< 7

< 219

< 34

< 17

< 437

< 60

< 1 8

< 416

< 70

< 17

< 387

< 56

< 20

< 475

< 82

< 9

< 261

< 37

< 14

< 346

< 58

< 1 3

< 292

< 48

< 1 1

< 255

< 40

< 16

< 344

< 57

< 1 1

< 262

< 45

< 14

< 249

< 55

< 1 1

< 208

< 46

0 (0

TABLE C-1 1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FODDER CROPS*

Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE

<---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID DATE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 SA-VGT-13E3 12/1 1/14 Silage 233 +/- 1 39 3036 +/- 308

< 31

< 1 1 SA-VGT-14F4 1 2/1 1/14 Silage

< 1 84 3802 +/- 361

< 33

< 14 SA-VGT-2G3 12/1 1/14 Silage 265 +/- 144 4532 +/- 465

< 42

< 1 8 SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 12/1 1/14 Silage

< 1 54 1610 +/- 297

< 37

< 1 6 AVERAGE**

249 +/- 22 3245 +/- 2499

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION Cs-137

< 1 5

< 16

< 1 8

< 1 8 Ra-226 Th-232

< 355

< 60

< 375

< 70

< 450

< 76

< 304

< 64

TABLE C-12 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SOIL Soil is sampled every three years. Last collection date was in 2013.

Next collection date is due in 201 6.

C-20

TABLE C-13 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN BEEF AND GAME*

Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE

<----GAMMA EMITTERS---->

STATION ID DATE Be-7 1-1 31 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-GAM-13E3 02/21/14 Muskrat

< 1 17

< 33 2834 +/- 287

< 12

< 15 03/02/14 Muskrat

< 84

< 27 281 1 +/- 252

< 10

< 10 AVERAGE**

2823 +/- 33 SA-GAM-3E1 03/01/14 Muskrat

< 1 1 1

< 31 3274 +/- 286

< 1 1

< 12 AVERAGE**

3274 +/- 0 0

I 1\\.)

÷

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-14 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL START STOP SA-SWA-1 1A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E1 01/1 3/14 - 01/1 3/14

< 1 85

< 180

< 181

< 186

< 1 80 02/23/14 - 02/23/14

< 166

< 1 80

< 163

< 165

< 168 03/05/14 " 03/05/14 1760 +/- 231

< 188

< 1 91

< 1 65

< 165 04/10/14 " 04/1 0/14

< 170

< 169

< 171

< 172

< 170 05/07/1 4 " 05/07/14

< 1 67

< 169

< 167

< 169

< 1 82 06/02/1 4 " 06/02/14

< 184

< 1 84

< 183

< 1 81

< 179 07/09/14 " 07/09/14

< 1 82

< 181

< 1 82

< 1 84

< 184 08/05/14 - 08/05/14

< 181

< 1 84

< 181

< 1 80

< 1 83 09/12/14 - 09/12/14

< 1 81

< 177

< 178

< 177

< 179 10/09/14 " 10/09/14

< 1 67

< 1 83

< 1 84

< 1 82 1 1 /05/14

1 1/05/14

< 1 78

< 176

< 176 12/01/14 * "1 2/01/14

< 1 81

< 1 83

< 1 82

< 1 81 AVERAGE*

1760 +/- 0.0

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-22

0 I

(.)

TABLE C-15 SITE SA-SWA-1 1A1 SA-SWA-12C1 (C)

COLLECTION PERIOD 01/13/14 02/23/14 03/05/14 04/1 0/14 05/07/14 06/02/14 07/09/14 08/05/14 09/12/14 1 0/09/14 1 1/05/14 12/01/14 AVERAGE**

01/1 3/14 02/23/14 03/05/14 04/10/14 05/07/14 06/02/14 07/09/14 08/05/14 09/12/14 10/09/14 1 1/05/14 12/01/14 AVERAGE**

CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma 1-131*

< 0.9

< 0.8

< 0.7

< 0.8

< 0.7

< 0.9

< 1.8

< 0.6

< 0.5

< 0.7

< ç

< 1

< ç

< M

< ç

< 1 J

< M

< 69

< 132

< 27

< 42

< 1 5

< 34 K-40 97 +/- 42 77 +/- 35

< 37 148 +/- 33 1 30 +/- 40 86 +/- 40 1 08 +/- 61

< 76

< 49

< 28

< 48 61 +/- 30

< 43

< 44

< 7

< 54 1 13 +/- 23 87 +/- 47

< 34 87 +/- 52 Mn-54

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 1

< 4

< 2

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 4

< 2

< 4

< 1

< 5

< 2

< 4

< 3

<-----GAMMA EMITTERS----->

Co-58

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 2

< 3

< 1

< 4

< 2

< 3

< 4

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 5

< 2

< 4

< 2

< 4

< 3 Fe-59

< 7

< 1 3

< 7

< 1 2

< 4

< 6

< 3

< 8

< 5

< 7

< 6

< 7

< 1 3

< 7

< 1 1

< 5

< 1 0

< 4

< 1 1

< 4

< 8

< 6 Co-60

< 3

< 6

< 4

< 6

< 2

< 5

< 1

< 4

< 2

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 5

< 1

< 4

< 2

< 4

< 3 Zn-65

< 7

< 1 1

< 6

< 1 0

< 3

< 4

< 6

< 2

< 8

< 4

< 6

< 7

< 1 3

< 6

< 12

< 4

< 7

< 2

< 1 0

< 3

< 7

< 5 ZrNb-95

< 4

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 3

< 1

< 5

< 2

< 3

< 4

< 7

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 2

< 5

< 2

< 6

< 2

< 4

< 3

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANAL ¥ZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION Cs-134

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 3

< 1

< 4

< 2

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 4

< 1

< 4

< 2

< 3

< 3 Cs-1 37

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 2

< 3

< 1

< 4

< 2

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 4

< 1

< 5

< 2

< 3

< 3 BaLa140

< 1 0

< 9

< 6

< 1 1

< 5

< 6

< 17

< 7

< 6

< 7

< 5

< 8

< 9

< 6

< 1 3

< 6

< 5

< 1 1

< 1 9

< 1 1

< 5

< 8

< 4

0 I

N 6

TABLE C-15 SITE SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 COLLECTION PERIOD 01/13/14 02/23/14 03/05/14 04/1 0/14 05/07/14 06/02/14 07/09/14 08/05/14 09/12/14 1 0/09/14 1 1 /05/14 1 2/01/14 AVERAGE**

01/1 3/14 02/23/1 4 03/05/14 04/1 0/14 05/07/14 06/02/14 07/09/1 4 08/05/14 09/12/14 1 0/09/14 1 1/05/14 1 2/01/14 AVERAGE**

CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma 1-131*

< 0.7

< 0.9

< 0.6

< 0.8

< 0.7

< 1.7

< 0.6

< 0.7

< 0.4

< 0.5

< 0.7

< 0.9

< 0.8

< 0.6

< 0.7

< 1.3

< 0.5

< 0.6

< 0.4

< 0.6 K-40

< 33 88 +/- 55

< 68

< 1 04

< 8

< 48

< 40

< 8

< 52 79 +/- 32

< 3 1 9 3 +/- 53 87 +/- 1 4

< 37

< 65

< 60

< 41

< 1 7

< 47

< 78

< 9

< 50

< 1 6 1 50 +/- 50 68 +/- 43 1 09 +/- 1 1 6 Mn-54

< 3

< 6

< 2

< 6

< 1

< 2

< 5

< 1

< 6

< 2

< 4

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 4

< 2

< 4

< 1

< 6

< 2

< 3

< 4

<----GAMMA EMITTERS--->

Co-58

< 4

< 5

< 3

< 6

< 1

< 2

< 5

< 1

< 5

< 3

< 4

< 5

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 3

< 4

< 2

< 6

< 2

< 4

< 4 Fe-59

< 8

< 1 3

< 6

< 1 5

< 2

< 5

< 1 1

< 3

< 1 0

< 6

< 8

< 1 0

< 8

< 1 4

< 7

< 1 0

< 4

< 6

< 8

< 4

< 1 2

< 4

< 9

< 8 Co-60

< 3

< 6

< 4

< 6

< 1

< 2

< 5

< 1

< 6

< 2

< 4

< 5

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 2

< 3

< 4

< 1

< 5

< 2

< 3

< 3 Zn-65

< 6

< 1 1

< 6

< 1 3

< 2

< 4

< 9

< 2

< 1 2

< 5

< 7

< 9

< 7

< 1 1

< 5

< 9

< 3

< 6

< 7

< 2

< 9

< 4

< 6

< 7 ZrNb-95

< 4

< 5

< 3

< 6

< 1

< 2

< 6

< 1

< 7

< 3

< 4

< 5

< 4

< 7

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 3

< 4

< 2

< 6

< 2

< 4

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES Cs-134

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 5

< 1

< 2

< 4

< 1

< 6

< 2

< 3

< 4

< 3

< 5

< 3

< 4

< 2

< 4

< 1

< 5

< 1

< 3

< 4 Cs-137

< 4

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 1

< 2

< 5

< 1

< 7

< 2

< 4

< 7

< 3

< 5

< 2

< 4

< 1

< 6

< 2

< 4

< 4 BaLa140

< 6

< 8

< 5

< 1 3

< 2.

< 5

< 1 1

< 1 3

< 1 2

< 8

< 9

< 1 0

< 6

< 8

< 6

< 9

< 22

< 8

< 6

< 7

0 I

N U1 TABLE C-15 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION

<----GAMMA EMITTERS---->

SITE PERIOD 1-131*

K--40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 SA-SWA-7E1 01/1 3/14

< 0.9

< 34

< 3

< 8

< 3

< 6

< 4 02/23/1 4

< 0.9

< 58

< 5

< 1 2

< 5

< 1 3

< 4 03/05/14

< 0.8 87 +/- 36

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 3 04/10/14

< 0.9

< 37

< 5

< 1 0

< 5

< 9

< 5 05/07/14

< 0.8 61 +/- 25

< 2

< 5

< 2

< 4

< 2 06/02/14

< 0.7 59 +/- 31

< 2

< 4

< 2

< 3

< 2 07/09/14

< 0.7 87 +/- 50

< 4

< 5

< 1 0

< 4

< 9

< 5 08/05/14

< 1.6 70 +/- 34

< 1

< 3

< 1

< 2

< 1 09/12/14

< 0.5

< 53

< 6

< 7

< 1 4

< 5

< 1 2

< 5 1 0/09/14

< 0.8 99 +/- 30

< 1

< 2

< 3

< 1

< 3

< 2 1 1/05/14

< 0.6 71 +/- 47

< 3

< 6

< 3

< 6

< 3 1 2/01/14

< 0.7 1 35 +/- 56

< 4

< 9

< 4

< 8

< 4 AVERAGE**

84 +/- 49

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR D ECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1.0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa140

< 3

< 7

< 4

< 6

< 9

< 3

< 6

< 5

< 8

< 2

< 6

< 2

< 4

< 5

< 7

< 1

< 21

< 6

< 1 0

< 1

< 5

< 3

< 6

< 4

< 7

0 I

N 0>

TABLE C-16 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN EDIBLE FISH Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION

<---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 SA-ESF-1 1A1 05/07/14 2862 +/- 757

< 60

< 57

< 1 04

< 56 09/23/14 4825 +/- 920

< 58

< 95

< 242

< 51 1 0/22/14 3082 +/- 1 071

< 56

< 71

< 1 75

< 56 1 0/28/14 5641 +/- 1281

< 74

< 73

< 1 80

< 65 AVERAGE*

4103 +/- 2700 SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 05/07/14 3941 +/- 829

< 42

< 46

< 84

< 51 09/23/14 4306 +/- 575

< 38

< 56

< 1 73

< 3 1 09/23/14 3077 +/- 951

< 67

< 89

< 253

< 55 1 0/27/14 3723 +/- 461

< 26

< 25

< 72

< 25 1 0/27/14 4238 +/- 989

< 60

< 74

< 1 77

< 60 AVERAGE*

3857 +/- 990 SA-ESF-7E1 05/07/1 4 31 06 +/- 665

< 29

< 35

< 77

< 35 1 0/27/14 6348 +/- 1 343

< 89

< 1 02

< 219

< 86 1 1/10/14 3579 +/- 1 059

< 64

< 63

< 1 69

< 69 1 1/1 0/14 3689 +/- 714

< 40

< 39

< 97

< 37 AVERAGE*

4181 +/- 2934

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION Zn-65

< 1 1 8

< 1 28

< 121

< 1 32

< 87

< 86

< 1 1 5

< 53

< 128

< 78

< 214

< 141

< 82 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226

< 54

< 67

< 1 090

< 63

< 53

< 1 309

< 48

< 55

< 1 035

< 65

< 44

< 1449

< 53

< 42

< 785

< 35

< 36

< 576

< 59

< 55

< 1 1 37

< 25

< 24

< 502

< 55

< 52

< 1212

< 30

< 35

< 606

< 90

< 1 08

< 1745

< 63

< 79

< 1500

< 38

< 41

< 756

0 I

N TABLE C-17 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CRABS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION

<---GAMMA EMITTERS---->

STATION ID PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 SA-ECH-1 1 A1 07/23/14 2916 +/- 1 1 72

< 81

< 86

< 21 1

< 82 08/25/14 3952 +/- 881

< 73

< 85

< 1 37

< 72 AVERAGE*

3434 +/- 1465 SA-ECH-12C1 (C) 07/23/14 3024 +/- 1 1 90

< 90

< 91

< 209

< 75 08/25/14 3044 +/- 1 076

< 67

< 72

< 1 77

< 79 AVERAGE*

3034 +/- 28

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION Zn-65

< 146

< 1 79

< 1 96

< 1 67 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226

< 74

< 72

< 1 623

< 93

< 77

< 1 677

< 90

< 88

< 2099

< 71

< 79

< 1574

TABLE C-18 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION

<---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD Be7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-ESS-1 1 A1 06/27/14

< 354 3934 +/- 635

< 33

< 37

< 908 344 +/- 73 1 1/28/14

< 290 3996 +/- 607

< 28 29 +/- 1 8

< 599 236 +/- 91 AVERAGE*

3965 +/- 88 29 +/- 0 290 +/- 1 53 SA-ESS-12C1 (C) 06/27/14

< 651 1 5780 +/- 1 460

< 74

< 69

< 1 786 936 +/- 1 79 1 1/28/14

< 950 1 4480 +/- 1 657

< 1 03

< 97

< 2245 908 +/- 217 AVERAGE*

1 51 30 +/- 1 838 922 +/- 40 SA-ESS-15A1 06/27/14

< 471 8644 +/- 902

< 45

< 49

< 1 351 800 +/- 1 98 1 1 /28/14

< 452 5549 +/- 916

< 47

< 50

< 1 094 555 +/- 1 38 0

AVERAGE*

7097 +/- 4377 678 +/- 346 I

N CX>

SA-ESS-16A 1 06/27/1 4

< 505 5874 +/- 917

< 56

< 62 2030 +/- 1 01 6 947 +/- 1 74 1 1/28/14

< 354 3714 +/- 596

< 35

< 36 3016 +/- 987 753 +/- 104 AVERAGE*

4794 +/- 3055 2523 +/- 1 394 850 +/- 274 SA-ESS-1 6F1 06/27/1 4

< 383 1 6070 +/- 1 429

< 48

< 64 1 903 +/- 1 087 615 +/- 1 89 1 1/28/14

< 825 1 6880 +/- 1 633

< 84

< 80

< 1 864 996 +/- 235 AVERAGE*

1 6475 +/- 1 146 1 903 +/- 0 806 +/- 539 SA-ESS-6S2 1 2/03/14

< 392 3004 +/- 530

< 36

< 38

< 869 242 +/- 95 AVERAGE*

3004 +/- 0 242 +/- 0 SA-ESS-7E1 06/27/14

< 476 1 33 1 0 +/- 1 21 4

< 44

< 57 2058 +/- 1 155 695 +/- 1 69 1 1 /28/14

< 620 1 3560 +/- 1 624

< 59

< 64 2709 +/- 1394 948 +/- 218 648 AVERAGE*

1 3435 +/- 354 2922 +/- 1468 1 031 +/- 571

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-19 Concentrations of Tritium and Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL Sample Date Name Collected Nuclide Result 2 Sigma Units Ty!l§l SA-APT-5S2 14-Feb-14 Be-7 1.14E-01

+I-2.16E-02 pCi/m3 SA-APT-5S2 16-May-14 Be-7 9.91 E**02

+I-2.74E-02 pCi/m3 SA-APT-5S2 14-Aug-14 Be-7 9.02E-02

+/-

2.1 8E-02 pCilm3 SA-APT-5S2 1 3-Nov-14 Be-7 8.91 E-02

+I-1. 75E-02 pCi/m3 SA-MLK-1 4F4 9-Feb-14 K-40 1.53E+03

+I-2.07E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 9-Mar-1 4 K-40 1.45E+03

+I-1.81 E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 6-Apr-14 K-40 1.44E+03

+/-

1.98E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 4-May-14 K-40 1.33E+03

+I-1.85E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 1 -Jun-14 K-40 1.61 E+03

+/-

1.98E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 6-Jul-14 K-40 1.45E+03

+/-

1.62E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 3-Aug-1 4 K-40 1.43E+03

+/-

1.39E+02 pCi/L.

SA-MLK-14F4 1-Sep-14 K-40 1.20E+03

+/-

1.56E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 5-0ct-1 4 K-40 1.49E+03

+/-

1.86E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 9-Nov-1 4 K-40 1.48E+03

+/-

1.56E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 7-Dec-1 4 K-40 1.26E+03

+/-

1.94E+02 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1A1 5-Mar-14 K-40 8.26E+01

+/-

3.39E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1A1 2-Jun-14 K-40 4.38E+01

+/-

1.58E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1A1 12-Sep-14 K-40 5.92E+01

+/-

3.08E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1 A 1 1-Dec-14 K-40 9.70E+01

+/-

3.09E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1A1 5-Mar-14 Tritium 1.78E+03

+/-

5.46E+02 pCi/L SA-FPL.-1 5S2 27-0ct-1 4 Be-7 1.75E+02

+/-

5.33E+01 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL.-1 5S2 27-0ct-1 4 K-40 2.00E+03

+/-

2.33E+02 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL.-1 6S 1 1 9-Nov-14 Be-7 3.06E+02

+/-

1.21 E+02 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-16S1 30-Sep-1 4 K-40 2.23E+03

+/-

2.78E+02 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL-16S1 27-0ct-14 K-40 1.88E+03

+/-

2.1 8E+02 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL-16S1 1 9-Nov-1 4 K-40 3.61 E+03

+/-

4.36E+02 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-1 S1 1 9-Nov-1 4 Be-7 3.07E+02

+/-

8.58E+01 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-1S1 1 9-Nov-1 4 K-40 4.25E+03

+/-

4.60E+02 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-7S2 27.. 0ct-1 4 Be-7 1.36E+02

+/-

6.65E+01 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-7S2 27-0ct-14 K-40 4.30E+03

+/-

4.27E+02 pCi/kg Collards C-29

TABLE C-19 Concentrations of Tritium and Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL Sample Date Name Collected Nuclide Result 2 Sigma Units Type SA-FPV-1 5F4 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 2.08E+03

+I-2.68E+02 pCi/kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-1 G1 1 9-May-14 K-40 2.17E+03

+I-2.36E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV-1G1 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 2.59E+03

+I-3.29E +02 pCI/kg Corn SA-FPV-1G1 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 1.48E+03

+I-2.56E+02 pCi/kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-2F9 1 1-May-1 4 K-40 2.28E+03

+I-2.7'7E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV-2G2 1 9-May-14 K-40 1.72E+03

+I-1.86E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV-2G2 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 2.20E+03

+I-2.81 E+02 pCi/kg Corn SA-FPV-2G2 30-Jul-14 K-40 1.63E+03

+I-2.27E+02 pCi/kg Peppers SA-FPV-2G2 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 1.90E+03

+I-2.36E+02 pCi/kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-3F8 8-Aug-14 K-40 1.68E+03

+I-2.09E+02 pCi/kg Peaches SA-FPV-3H5 1 9-May-14 K-40 2.1 6E+03

+I-2.36E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV-3H5 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 1.84E+03

+I-2.62E+02 pCi/kg Corn SA-GAM-13F3 21 -Feb-14 K-40 2.63E+03

+I-2.56E+02 pCi/kg Muskrat SA-GAM-3F1 1-Mar-1 4 K-40 2.72E+03

+I-3.62E+02 pCi/kg Muskrat SA-ESF-1 1A1 1 8-May-14 K-40 4.1 1 E+03

+I-4.91 E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESF-1 1A1 28-0ct-14 K-40 3.86E+03

+I-3.83E+02 pCi/kg SA-ECH-1 1A1 25-Jul-14 K-40 2.98E+03

+I-2.92E+02 pCI!kg SA-ESS-1 1A 1 27-Jun-14 K-40 3.67E+03

+I-6.65E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESS-1 1A1 28-Nov-14 K-40 2.79E+03

+I-6.55E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESS-1 1A1 27-Jun-1 4 Ra-226 3.1 9E+02

+I-8.28E+01 pCi/kg SA-ESS-1 1A1 28-Nov-14 Ra-226 1.95E+02

+I-9.22E+01 pCi/kg SA-ESS-6S2 3-Dec-1 4 Be-7 5.75E+02

+I-

2. 77E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESS-6S2 3-Dec-1 4 K-40 2.16E+03

+I-5.29E+02 pCi/kg C-30

100£H) 10:0J}

M:"

0 ::E' I

UJ O

c..

C?*

=

c.

a:.

(

FIGURE 1 GROSS, BETA ACTMTY IN AIR PARllC:ULATES -QUARTERLY AVERAGE 1990 THROUGH 2014 tOOO tOO Hi 1

lf! {::i!lf3l {41

{5)

GROSS mETA iN JUR PARllCIJLATE

{6}1973 THROUGH 2M4 1916 1979 1982 1005 19\\S$

191!J1 10041 1001 2(i(l(l 2003 21)00 2000 2!l12 1n.O +--

'LO A A A A A a

a

v 8{)co 9o,; 1-, 6"" '\\-<Q,<t 5"'""'...Ji<.._-:o i-Weapons:Test1974 2-Weapons:Test1916 :3-1Jifeapons:Tesl:19ll 4-Weapons:Test1978 5-Weapons:Testi001 6-Chernoby'l1900 7-20t3ootairn::'rudestempmarys:ampingt'Oeafions-s:eeProgll:lmCrums:eeticm.

FIGURE 2 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER - QUARTERLY AVERAGE 1 990 THROUGH 201 4 1 0000.00,--

10000 1 000 1 00 1 0 TRITIUM ACTIVITY I N SURFACE WATER (1) [2) (3) ;4; (S)

(o) 1973 Through 2014 Effluent Discharge near time of sampling: 03-05-14

+

1 000.00 1-==

_J

(_)

Effluent Discharge near time of sampling: 07-07-05 Effluent Discharge near time of sampfing: 05-1 1-12 0

0..

1 CN N

1 00.00 +--

1 0.00 +rr

ÿ

n

¢

£

^

_ ` a

b c d e f g h i j

k l m

n o p q r s t u s t v w w s s x y z z { l } ~ ~ ? ?

1 -Weapons Test 1 974 2-Weapons Test 1 976 3-Weapons Test 1 977 4-Weapons Test 1 978 5-Weapons Test 1 981 6-Chernobyl 1 986 Tritium detected in only one sample in 2012 (05/1 1/12}, 2013 (07/06/13} and 2014 (03/05/14)

0 I

w w

FIGURE 3 CESIUM-1 37 & COBALT-60 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT - SEMI-ANNUAL AVERAGE 1 990 THROUGH 201 4 1 0000 --

r

- CS-137

- - - C0-60 "

1 000 +-----------!

OJ 0

0..

10000 1 000 1 00 1 0 C ESIUM-137 & C OBALT -60 ACTIVITY I N AQUATIC SEDIMENT 1 977 THROUGH 2014

there has not been any Co-60 detected above MDC since 2002 1 00 +--

i

/

1 0 I

\\ I

\\

I

.., - J

\\

]

[

P Q U V W X Y Z R S T 0

-. / 0 - 1 2 -, 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Data collection started in 1 977.

0 Ol

(>)

6 G

0..

FIGURE 4 CESIUM-1 37 ACTIVITY IN SOIL 1 974 THROUGH 201 3 (TRIENNIAL}

800.--

700 +--

600 +--

500 400 300 200 +--

Ñ

1 00 +----------------------------

I 0 +--

1 974 1 977 1 980 1 983 1 986 1 989 1 992 1 995 1 998 2001 2004 2007 201 0 201 3

APPEN DIX D SUMMRY OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS FROM ECKERT & ZIEGLER ANAL YTICS (EZA), ENVIRONMENTAL RESOU RCE ASSOICATES (ERA), AND DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

D-1

Intentionally left blank D-2

TABLE D-1 EZA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a)

Value (b)

TBE/Analtics Evaluation (d)

March 201 4 E1 0854 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 95.1 91.7 1.04 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 1 0.9 1 5.1 0.72 w

E1 0855 Milk 1-1 31 pCi/L 96.6 98.5 0.98 A

Ce-1 41 pCi/L 1 1 2 1 1 9 0.94 A

Cr-51 pCi/L 449 491 0.91 A

Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 86 21 0 0.89 A

Cs-1 37 pCi/L 250 253 0.99 A

Co-58 pCi/L 248 268 0.93 A

Mn-54 pCi/L 292 297 0.98 A

Fe-59 pCi/L 230 219 1.05 A

Zn-65 pCi/L 31 2 323 0.97 A

Co-60 pCi/L 321 337 0.95 A

E1 0857 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 53.0 53.9 0.98 A

Cr-51 pCi 232 223 1.04 A

Cs-1 34 pCi 1 00 95.3 1.05 A

Cs-1 37 pCi 1 22 1 1 5 1.06 A

Co-58 pCi 1 22 1 2 1 1.01 A

Mn-54 pCi 1 35 1 35 1.00 A

Fe-59 pCi 1 1 1 99.3 1.1 2 A

Zn-65 pCi 1 40 1 47 0.95 A

Co-60 pCi 1 87 1 53 1.22 w

E1 0856 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 74.1 76.4 0.97 A

E1 0858 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2090 1 760 1.1 9 A

June 201 4 E1 091 3 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.9 91.3 0.94 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 1 3.8 1 4.5 0.95 A

E1 091 4 Milk 1-1 31 pCi/L 86.5 90.9 0.95 A

Ce-1 41 pCi/L 1 1 1 1 24 0.90 A

Cr-51 pCi/L 255 253 1.01 A

Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 47 1 62 0.91 A

Cs-1 37 pCi/L 1 23 1 20 1.03 A

Co-58 pCi/L 1 05 1 1 2 0.94 A

Mn.. 54 pCi/L 1 55 1 56 0.99 A

Fe-59 pCi/L 1 06 1 02 1.04 A

Zn-65 pCi/L 251 252 1.00 A

Co-60 pCi/L 2 1 8 224 0.97 A

E1 091 6 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 95.1 92.6 1.03 A

Cr-51 pCi 21 5 1 90 1.1 3 A

Cs-1 34 pCi 1 22 1 22 1.00 A

Cs-1 37 pCi 95.1 89.8 1.06 A

Co-58 pCi 88.7

84. 1 1.05 A

Mn-54 pCi 1 1 5 1 1 6 0.99 A

Fe-59 pCi 72.6 76.7 0.95 A

Zn-65 pCi 1 93 1 89 1.02 A

Co-*60 pCi 1 79 1 68 1.07 A

E1 091 5 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 85.6 85.2 1.00 A

D-3

TABLE 0*1 EZA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Vaiue (a)

Value (b)

TBE/Analtics Evaluation (d)

June 201 4 E1091 7 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1 680 1 8 1 0 0.93 A

September 201 4 E1 0946 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 90.7 96.9 0.94 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 1 4.0 1 6.4 0.85 A

E1 0947 Milk 1-1 31 pCi/L 92.0 97.6 0.94 A

Ce-1 41 pCi/L 1 1 7 1 26 0.93 A

Cr-51 pCi/L 281 288 0.98 A

Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 41 1 58 0.89 A

Cs-1 37 pCi/L 1 86 1 93 0.96 A

Co-58 pCi!L 1 37 1 43 0.96 A

Mn-54 pCi/L 1 38 1 42 0.97 A

Fe-59 pCi/L 1 62 1 58 1.03 A

Zn-65 pCi/L 75.2 73.0 1.03 A

Co-60 pCi/L 286 297 0.96 A

E1 0949 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 97.8 82.1 1. 1 9 A

Cr-51 pCi 2 1 2 1 88 1.1 3 A

Cs-1 34 pCi 1 06 1 03 1.03 A

Cs-1 37 pCi 1 31 1 26 1.04 A

Co-58 pCI 85.7 93.0 0.92 A

Mn-54 pCi 92.8 92.3 1.01 A

Fe-59 pCi 1 1 3 1 03 1.1 0 A

Zn-65 pCi 53.2 47.5 1.12 A

Co-60 pCi 202 1 93 1.05 A

E1 0948 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 83.9 89.8 0.93 A

E10950 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 201 0 1 720 1.1 7 A

E1 0951 Soil Ce-1 41 pCi/g 0.208 0. 1 86 1.1 2 A

Cr-51 pCi/g 0.398 0.425 0.94 A

Cs-1 34 pCi/g 0.21 6 0.233 0.93 A

Cs-1 37 pCi/g 0.398 0.365 1.09 A

Co-58 pCi/g 0.197 0.21 1 0.93 A

Mn-54 pCi/g 0.242 0.209 1.1 6 A

Fe-59 pCi/g 0.238 0.233 1.02 A

Zn-65 pCi/g 0.1 1 7 0.108 1.08 A

Co-60 pCi/g 0.447 0.438 1.02 A

December 201 4 E1 1 078 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.7 95.7 0.90 A

Sr-90 pCi/L 1 2.9 1 5.6 0.83 A

E1 1 079 Milk 1-1 31 pCi/L 85.9 95.1 0.90 A

Ce-1 41 pCi/L 205 2 1 9 0.94 A

Cr-51 pCi/L 402 406 0.99 A

Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 56 1 64 0.95 A

Cs-1 37 pCi/L 1 94 1 98 0.98 A

Co-58 pCi/L 1 22 1 30 0.94 A

Mn-54 pCi/L 220 225 0.98 A

Fe-59 pCi/L 1 83 1 75 1.05 A

Zn-65 pCi!L 287 297 0.97 A

Co-60 pCi/L 224 235 0.95 A

D-4

TABLE D*1 EZA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a)

Value (b)

TBE/Analtics December 201 4 E 1 1 081 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 96.4 1 02 Cr-51 pCi 1 71 1 90 Cs-1 34 pCi 73.1 76.9 Cs-1 37 pCi 99.0 92.6 Co-58 pCi 57.5 60.8 Mn-54 pCi 1 07 1 05 Fe-59 pCi 74.2 81.6 Zn-65 pCi 1 44 1 39 Co-60 pCi 1 1 4 1 1 0 E1 1 080 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 93.5 98.2 E1 1 082 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1 760 1 970 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytlcs known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present In the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Rallo of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytlcs results.

(d) Analytics evaluation based on TBE Internal QC //mils: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning, reported result falls within 0. 70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0. 70 and > 1. 30.

D-5 0.95 0.90 0.95 1.07 0.95 1.02 0.91 1.04 1.04 0.95 0.89 Evaluation (d)

A A

A

TABLE D-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 1 OF 1)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value (a)

Value (b)

Limits Evaluation (c)

May 201 4 RAD-97 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 38.25 36.7 27.5 - 43.6 Sr-90 pCi/L 24.65 26.5 1 9.2 - 30.9 8a-1 33 pCi/L 89.1 87.9 74.0 - 96.7 Cs*-1 34 pCi/L 45.55 44.3 35.5 - 48.7 Cs-1 37 pCi/L 91. 1 5 89.1 80.2 - 1 01 Co-60 pCI/L 65.1 0 64.2 57.8 - 73.1 Zn-65 pCi/L 244 235 212 - 275 Gr-A pCi/L 45.65 61.0 31.9 - 75.8 Gr-8 pCi/L 27.95 33.0 21.4 - 40.7 1-1 31 pCi/L 23.75 25.7 21.3 - 30.3 U-N at pCi/L 9.61 1 0.2 7.95 - 1 1.8 H-3 pCi/L 8435 8770 761 0 - 9650 MRAD-20 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 28.0 46.0 1 5.4 - 71.4 November 201 4 RAD-99 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 30.4 31.4 22.8 - 38.1 Sr-90 pCi/L 1 8.6 21.8 1 5.6 - 25.7 8a-1 33 pCi/L 46.8 49.1 40.3 - 54.5 Cs-1 34 pCi/L 88.0 89.8 73.7 - 98.8 Cs-1 37 pCI/L 99.0 98.8 88.9 - 1 1 1 Co-60 pCi/L 92.5 92.1 82.9 - 1 04 Zn-65 pCi/L 325 3 1 0 279 - 362 Gr-A pCi/L 29.9 37.6 19.4 - 48.1 Gr-8 pCi/L 27.5 27.4 1 7.3 - 35.3 1-1 31 pCi/L 1 5.8 20.3 1 6.8 - 24.4 U-Nat pCi/L 5.74 5.80 4.34 - 6.96 H-3 pCi/L 6255 6880 5940 - 7570 MRAD-21 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 27.3 36.9 1 2.4 - 57.3 (1) The /odine-131 was evaluated as failed with a ratio of 0. 778. No cause could be found for the s/ighly low activity. TBE would evaluate this as acceptab/le with warning. A rerun was not possible due to 1-131 decay. All previous ERA lodine-131 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. NCR 14-08 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The ERA known value Is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.

D-6 A

A A

A N (1 )

A A

A

TABLE D-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 1 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide*

Units Value (a)

Value (b)

Range Evaluation (c)

March 201 4 14-MaW30 Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.764 0.720 0.504 -* 0.936 A

Cs-1 34 Bq/L 20.7 23.1 1 6.2 - 30 0 A

Cs-1 37 Bq/L 28.0 28.9 20.2 - 37.6 A

Co-57 Bq/L 26.5 27.5 1 9.3 - 35.8 A

Co-60 Bq/L 1 5.6 1 6.0 1 1.2 - 20.8 A

H-3**

Bq/L NR 321 225 - 41 7 N (3)

Mn-54 Bq/L 1 3.5 1 3.9 9.7 - 1 8.1 A

Ni-63 Bq/L NR 34.0 23.8 - 44.2 N (3)

Pu-238 Bq/L 0.91 1 0.828 0.580 - 1.076 Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.751 0.676 0.473 - 0.879 K-40 Bq/L NR (1 )

N (3)

Sr-90**

Bq/L NR 8.51 5.96 - 1 1.06 N (3)

U-234/233**

Bq/L NR 0.225 0. 1 58 - 0.293 N (3)

U-238**

Bq/L NR 1.45 1.02 - 1.89 N (3)

Zn-65 Bq/L

-0.201 (1)

A 14-MaS30 Soil Cs-1 34 Bq/kg 2.02 (1 )

A Cs-1 37 Bq/kg 1 300 1 238 867 - 1 609 A

Co-57 Bq/kg 1 069 966 676 - 1 256 A

Co-60 Bq/kg 1.32 1.22 (2)

A Mn-54 Bq/kg 1 51 0 1 430 1 001 - 1 859 A

K-40 Bq/kg 669 622 435 - 809 A

Sr-90 Bq/kg

4. 1 4 (1)

A Zn-65 Bq/kg 763 695 487 - 904 A

14-RdF30 AP Cs-1 34**

Bq/sample NR 1.91 1.34 - 2.48 N (3)

Cs-1 37**

Bq/sample NR 1.76 1.23 - 2.29 N (3) co.. 57**

Bq/sample NR (1)

N (3)

Co-60**

Bq/sample NR 1.39 0.97 - 1.81 N (3)

Mn-54**

Bq/sample NR (1)

N (3)

Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.8220 1. 1 8 0.83.. 1.53 N (3)

Zn-65**

Bq/sample NR (1)

N (3) 1 4-GrF30 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.606 1.77 0.53.. 3.01 A

Gr-8 Bq/sample 0.7507 0.77 0.39 - 1.1 6 A

1 4-RdV30 Vegetation Cs-1 34 Bq/sample 5.96 6.04 4.23 - 7.85 A

Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 5.06 4.74 3.32 - 6. 1 6 A

Co-57 Bq/sample 1 1.8 1 0. 1

7. 1 - 1 3.1 A

Co-60 Bq/sample 7.34 6.93 4.85.. 9.01 A

Mn-54 Bq/sample 8.95 8.62 6.03 - 1 1.21 A

Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.23 1.46 1.02.. 1.90 A

Zn-65 Bq/sample 8.91 7.86 5.50 - 1 0.22 A

D-7

TABLE D-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 2 OF 2}

Identification Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide*

Units Value (a)

Value (b)

Range Evaluation (c)

September 201 4 1 4-MaW31 Water Am-241 Bq/L 0.705 0.88 0.62 - 1.1 4 A

Cs-1 34***

Bq/L NR (1 )

N (4)

Cs-1 37***

Bq/L NR 1 8.4 1 2.9 - 23.9 N (4)

Co-57***

Bq/L NR 24.7 1 7.3 - 32.1 N (4)

Co-60***

Bq/L NR 1 2.4 8.7 - 1 6.1 N (4)

Mn-54***

Bq/L NR 1 4.0 9.8 - 1 8.2 N (4)

Ni-63 Bq/L 24.07 24.6 1 7.2 - 32.0 A

Pu-238 Bq/L 0.591 0.61 8 0.433 - 0.803 A

Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0.01 53 0.0048 (2)

A K-40***

Bq/L NR 1 61 1 1 3 - 209 N (4)

Zn-65***

Bq/L NR 1 0.9 7.6 - 1 4.2 N (4) 1 4-MaS31 Soil Cs-1 34***

Bq/kg NR 622 435 - 809 N (4)

Cs-1 37***

Bq/kg N R (1)

N (4)

Co-57***

Bq/kg N R 1 1 1 6 781 - 1 451 N (4)

Co-60***

Bq/kg NR 779 545 - 1 0 1 3 N (4)

Mn-54***

Bq/kg N R 1 009 706 - 1 312 N (4)

K-40***

Bq/kg NR 824 577 - 1 071 N (4)

Sr-90 Bq/kg 694 858 601 - 1 1 1 5 A

Zn-65***

Bq/kg NR 541 379 - 703 N (4) 1 4-RdF31 AP Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.31 0 0.703 0.492 - 0.914 N (4) 1 4-GrF31 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.1 53 0.53 0.1 6 - 0.90 N (4)

Gr-B Bq/sample 0.977 1.06 0.53 - 1.59 A

September 201 4 1 4-RdV31 Vegetation Cs-1 34 Bq/sample 7.31 7.38 5.1 7 - 9.59 A

Cs-1 37 Bq/sampie 8.93 8.14 5.70 - 1 0.58 A

Co-57 Bq/sample 1 0.8 9.2 6.4 - 1 2.0 A

Co-60 Bq/sample 6.31

6. 1 1 4.28 - 7.94 A

Mn-54 Bq/sample 7.76 7.1 0 4.97 - 9.23 A

Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.738 0.85 0.60 - 1.1 1 A

Zn-65 Bq/sample 7.1 6 6.42 4.49 - 8.35 A

The MAPEP cross check isotope list has been reduced due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients.

- Starting 2014, these nuclides will no longer be part of the TBE cross check program due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients. MAPEP evaluates non-reported analyses as failed If they were reported In the previous series.

- - All future gamma cross check samples for these Isotopes will be provided by Analytlcs.

(1) False positive test.

(2) Sensitivity evaluation.

(3)

Water, Ni-63 overlooked when reporting, but the result of 32.7 +- 1.69 would have passed the acceptance criteria. NCR 14-04 Water, the non-detected K-40 was overlooked when reporting, but would have passed the false positive test. NCR 14-04 AP, Sr-90 rerun was within the low range of the acceptqance criteria. The original and rerun results were) statistically the same. No cause could be Identified for the slightly low Sr-90 activity. NCR 14-04 For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-04 (4) AP, Sr-90 gravimetric yield was very high at 117%. Could indicate larger than normal amounts of calcium in the AP. A second fuming HNO 3 separation would be required to remove the excess calcium. NCR 14-09 AP, Gr-Aipha was counted on the wrong side. When flipped over and recounted the results were acceptable. NCR 14-09 For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-09 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to *tOO% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) DOE/MAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

D-8

TABLE D-4 PT Provider EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA EZA Quarter I

_ Year 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/201 4 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/201 4 1st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/2014 1 st/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2f}Q/201 4 2nd/201 4 2nd/201 4 2nd/201 4 2f1d/2014 2nd/201 4 EZA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 2)

Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value 05/1 6/14 E1 0846 Cartri<:!f!§__

pCi lodine-1 31 7.83E+01 7.52E+01 Strontium-05/1 6/14 E1 084?

Milk pCi/L 89 9.1 4E+01 9.1 7E+01 Strontium-05/1 6/14 E1 0847 Milk pCi/L 90 r-11.7E+01 1.51 E+01 05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L lodine-1 31 9.84E+01 9.85E+01 05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cerlum-1 41 1.21 E+O 1. 1 9E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cr-51 5.1 9E+O? 4.91 E+02 -

05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1.79E+O? 2.10E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 37 2.55E+02 2.53E+02 05/16/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.58E+02 2.68E+02 05/16/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Mn-54 3.01 E+02 2.9?E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L lrof1-59 2.24E+02 2.1 9E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.45E+02 3.23E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 3.39E+02 3.37E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water J2Ci/L lodine-1 31 9.24E+01 8.99E+01 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Cerium-1 41 8.1 9E+01 7.71 E+01 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Cr-51 3.32E+O 3.1 9E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1.2?E+02 1.36E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Ceslum-1 37 1.69E+O 1.64E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.75E+O? 1.74E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Mn-54 2.08E+O 1.93E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.68E+O 1.42E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water*

pCi/L Zinc-65 2.25E+O 2.1 0E+02 05/1 6/14 E1 0849 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.31 E+O 2.1 9E+02 08/08/14 E1 0897 Cartridge pCi lodine-1 31 8.73E+01 8.54E+01 Strontium-08/08/14 E1 0898 Milk pCi/L 89 9.84E+01 9. 1 3E+01 Strontium-08/08/14 E1 0898 Milk oCi/L 90 1.44E+01 1.45E+01 08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L lodine-1 31 9.89E+01 9.09E+01 08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cerium-1 41 1.38E+O 1.24E+02 Chromium-08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L 51 2.68E+O 2.53E+02 08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1.58E+O 1.62E+02 08/08/1 4 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1.27E+O 1.20E+02 08/08/14 E1 0899

_ __M!!L__

pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.20E+O 1.12E+02 Manganese-08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L 54 1.67E+O 1.56E+02 08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.02E+O 1.02E+02 08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 2.68E+O 2.52E+02 08/08/14 E1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.42E+O 2.24E+02 08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L lodine-1 31 1.1 3E+O 9.83E+01 D-9 Acceptance Range/

Ratio Evaluation 1.04 A

1 A

0.84 A

1 A

1.02 A

1.06 A

0.85 A

1.01 A

0.96 A

1.01 A

1.02 A

1.07 A

1.00 A

1.03 A

1.06 A

1.04 A

0.93 A

1.03 A

1.01 A

1.08 A

1 '18 A

1.07 A

1.02 A

1.08 A

0.99 A

1.09 A

1.12 A

1.06 A

0.9'1 A

1.06 A

1.0'1 A

1.0'7 A

1.00 A

1.06 A

1.08 A

1.15 A

TABLE D-4 PT Quarter I Provider Year EZA 2nd/2014 EZA 2nd/2014 EZA 2nd/2014 EZA 2nd/2014 EZA 2nd/2014 EZA 2nd/2014 O--

2nd/2014 EZA 2nd/2014 EZA 2nd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/201 4 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/201 4 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA 3rd/2014 EZA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value -

08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pC\\/L Cerium-141 1.52E+02 1.43E+02 Chromium-08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L 51 3.62E+02 2.94E+02 08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L Ces\\um-134 1.69E+02 1.88E+02 08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCI/L __ 1-_gium-1 37 1.48E+02 1.39E+02 08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.34E+O 1.30E+02 Manganese-08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L 54 1.88E+O? 1.80E+02 08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L Iron-59 1.29E+02 1.19E+02 08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.29E+O 2.93E+02 08/08/14 E1 0900 Water pCi/L Coba\\t-60 2.74E+O 2.60E+02 1 1 /22/14 E1 0993 CartridQe pC\\

\\odine-1 31 9.47E+01 8.99E+01 Strontium-1 1/22/14 E1 0994 Milk pCi/L 89 9.73E+01 9.69E+01 Strontium-1 1/22/14 E1 0994 Milk oCi/L 90 1.31 E+01 1.64E+01 1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L

\\odine-131 1.04E+02 9.76E+01 1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Cerium-1 41 1.28E+O 1.26E+02 Chromium-1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L 51 3.12E+02 2.88E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pC\\/L Cesium-134 1.51 E+02 1.58E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 37 2.03E+O 1.93E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.44E+O 1.43E+02 Manganese-1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L 54 1.49E+02 1.42E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1.82E+02 1.58E+O_?

1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 7.41 E+01 7.30E+01 1 1/22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Coba\\t-60 3.1 4E+02 2.94E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L

\\odine-1 31 1.02E+02 9.88E+01 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Cerium-1 41 1.30E+02 1.25E+02 Chromium-1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCI/L 51 2.75E+02 2.86E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1.45E+02 1.56E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1.94E+02 1.92E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1.43E+O 1.42E+02 Manganese-1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L 54 1.46E+O 1.41 E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water oCI/L.

Iron-59 1.66E+02 1.57E+02 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 7.55E+01 7.24E+01 1 1/22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Coba\\t-60 3.09E+02 2.95E+02 D-1 0 Acceptance Range/

Ratio 1.06 1.23 0.90 1.06 1.03 1.04 1.09 1.12 1.05 1.05 1.00 0.80 1.07 1.01 1.08 0.96 1.05 1.01 1.05 1.1 5 1.01 1.06 1 03 1 04 0.96 0.93 1.01 1.01 1.04 1.06 1.04 1.05 Evaluation A

A A

A

TABLE D-5 PT Quarter I Provider Year MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/201 4 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 1(1)MA 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2ndl2014 MAPEP 2ndl2014 MAPEP 2ndl2014 MAPEP 2ndl2014 MAPEP 2ndl2014 MAPEP 2ndl2014 MAPEP 2ndl201 4 MAPEP 2nd/201 4 MAPEP 2ndl2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2ndl201 4 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 5)

Acceptance Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Range/

Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio MAPEP 06/05/14 GrF30 Filter Bq/sarnpie Gross Alpha 1.980 1.77 0.53-3.01 MAPEP 06/05/14 GrF30 Filter Bq/sampie Gross Beta 0.823 0,77 0.39-1.16 MAPEP Americium-06/05/1 4 MaS30 Soil Ba/kq 241 65 68 47.6-88.4 MAPEP False Positive 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kq Ceslum-134 5.44 0

Test MAPEP 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Bg/kq Cesium-1 37 1270 1238 867-1609 MAPEP 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Bq/kq Cobalt-57 947 966 676-1 256 MAPEP 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg Cobait-60 0.581 1.220 Sens. Eval.

MAPEP 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg Iron-55 580 643 444-824 MAPEP Manganese-06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg 54 1 470 1 430 1 001-1 859 MAPEP False Positive 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg Nickel-63 6.95 0

Test MAPEP-1 4-Plutonium-06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Bq/kg 238 89.7 96.0 67-125 MAPEP Plutonium-06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg 239/240 69.80 76.8 53.8-99.8 MAPEP-1 4-Potassium-06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Bq/kg 40 703 622 435-809 MAPEP Strontium-False Positive 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kq 90 1.48 0

Test MAPEP Technetium-False Positive 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg 99 37.1 0

Test MAPEP 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg U-234/233 30.5 81.0 57-105 MAPEP Uranium-06/05/1 4 MaS30 Soil Balkg 238 35 83 58-108 MAPEP 06105114 MaS30 Soil Bali<g Zinc-65 766 695 487-904 MAPEP 0610511 4 MaW30 Water BqiL Am-241 0.759 0.720 0.504-0.936 MAPEP 06105114 MaW30 Water Ball Cesium-134 21.4 23.1 1 6.2-30.0 MAPEP 06105/14 MaW30 Water Ball Ceslum-1 37 29.7Q_

28.9 20.2-37.6 MAPEP 06105/1 4 MaW30 Water Ball Cobalt-57 28.0 27.5 1 9.3-35.8 MAPEP 06105/14 MaW30 Water Ball Cobalt-60 1 6.6 1 6.0 1 1.2-2_0.8 MAPEP 0610511 4 MaW30 Water

__ fu]LL Hvdroqen-3 308 __

321 225-417 MAPEP False Positive 0610511 4 MaW30 Water Bqll Iron-55 0.3 0.0 Test MAPEP Manganese-0610511 4 MaW30 Water Ball 54 1 4.4 1 3.9

9. 7-1 8.1 MAPEP 06105/14 MaW30 Water BqiL Nickel-63 3 1.4 34.0 23.8-44.2 MAPEP Plutonium-06105/14 MaW30 Wa!

BaiL 238 0.764 0.828 0.580-1.076 D-1 1 Evaluation A

A A

Not (1)

Acceptable Not (1 )

Acceptable A

A A

_ A A ----

A ---

A A

A

TABLE D-5 PT Provider MAPEP MAPEP

_fy1APEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MAPEP MA.EE.E._ _

MAf:'EP f\\PEP Quarter I Year 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/201 4 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES Report Sample Date Number MAPEP 06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP 06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP 06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP 06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP 06/05/1 4 MaW30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP 06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP 06/05/14 MaW30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP-:_14-06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/1 4 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdF30 MAPEP 06/05/1 4 RdF30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdV30 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdV30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdV30 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdV30 (PAGE 2 OF 5)

Sample Media Unit Water Bq/L Water Bq/L Water Bq/L Water Bq/L Water Bq/L Water Bq/L Water B_g/L Water Bq/L Water Bq/L Water Bq/L Filter ug/sample Filter ug/sample Filter ug/sampie Filter ua/sample Filter Bq/sample Filter Bq/sample Filter Bq/sample Filter sam ole Filter Bq/sample Filter Bq/sample Filter Bq/sample Filter Bq/sample Filter Bq/sample Filter B_g/sample Filter Bq/samole Filter Bq/sample Filter Bq/sampie Filter Bq/sample Vegetation ug/sample Veqetation uq/samole Vegetation ug/sample Veqetation uq/sample D-1 2 Analyte I Nuclide Pu-239/240 Potassium-40 Strontium-90 Technetium-99 U-234/233 Uranium-238 Zinc-65 Gross Alpha Gross Beta lodine-129 Uranium-235 Uranium-238 Uranium-Total Americium-241 Cesium-1 34 Ceslum-1 37 Cobalt-57 Cobalt-60 Manganese-54 Plutonium-238 Pu-239/240 Strontium-90.

U-234/233 Uranium-238 Zinc-65 Gross Alpha Gross Beta Americium-241 Uranium-235 Uranium-238 Uranium-Total Americium-241 Acceptance GEL Known Range/

Value value Ratio 0.6590 0.6760 0.473-0.879 False Positive 0.460 0

Test 8.32 8.51 5.96-1 1.06 9.5 1 0.3 7.2-13.4 0.21 0 0.225 0.1 58-0.293 1.41 1.45 1.02-1.89 False Positive

-0. 1 26 0.0 Test 0.96 0.85 0.255-1.443 4.7 4.2 2.1 0-6.29 False Positive 0.0227 0.00 Test 0.01 8 0.020 0.014-0.026 8.77 1 0.4 7.3-1 3.5 8.80 1 0.4 7.3-1 3.5 0.086 0.090 0.063-0. 1 1 7 1.85 1,91 1.34-2.48 1.81 1.76 1.23-2.29 False Positive 0.0757 0.00 Test 1.490 1.39 0.97-1.81 False Positive 0.01 38 0.00 Test 0.000819 0.00090 Sens. Eval.

0.054-0.071 0.7720 0.1004 1. 1 9 1.1 8 0.83-1.53 0.01 37-0.01 59 0.01 95 0.0254 0.1 1 8 0.129 0.090-0.168 False Positive 0.246 0.00 Test 1.980

}.77 0.53-3.01 0.83 0.77 0.39-1. 1 6 0.106 0.104 0.073-0.135 0.01 88-0.261 0.0268 0.0348 1 2.7 1 3.-

9.3-1 7.3 1 2.7 1 3.3 9.3-1 7.3 0.1 1 00 0.1 0-__ 0.076-0.140 Evaluation A

A A

A Not (2)

Acceptable A

A A

TABLE D-5 PT Quarter I Provider Year MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 2nd/2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 1--MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 1-_MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 DOE's MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 3 OF 5)

Acceptance Report Sample Sample Ana lyle I GEL Known Range/

Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio MAPEP 06/05/14 RdV30 Venetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 5.65 6.04 4.23-7.85 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-1 37 4.98 4.74 3.32-6.16 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 1 1.1 1 0.1 7.1-1 3.1 MAPEP 06/05/14 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-60 7.21 6.93 4.85-9.01 MAPEP Manganese-06/05/14 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample 54 9.24 8.62 6.03-1 1.21 MAPEP-1 4-Plutonium-

- Q6/05/1 4 RdV30 VeQetation Bq/sample 238 0.1 1 6 0.121 0.085-0.157 MAPEP-1 4-0.1 08-06/05/14 RdV30 Veqetation Bq/sample Pu-239/240 0.134 0.154 0.0200 MAPEP Strontium-06/05/14 RdV30 Venetation Bq/sample 90 1.580 1.46 1.02-1.90 MAPEP 0.01 77-06/05/14 RdV30 Venetation Bq/sample U-234/233 0.2640 0.2530 0.0329 MAPEP Uranium-06/05/14 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample 238 0.174 0.165 0.1 1 6-0.215 MAPEP-1 4-06/05/14 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 8.87 7.00 4.38-8.13 MAPEP 01/09/15 GrF31 Filter Bq/sample Gross Alpha 0.433 0.530 0.16-0.09 MAPEP 01/09/15 GrF31 Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 1.060

'1.060 0.53-1.59 MAPEP Americium-01/09/1 5 MaS31 Soil B/Kg 241 88.4 85.5 59.9-1 1 1.2 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg Cesium-1 34 588 622 435-809 MAPEP False Positive 01/09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Cesium-1 37 1.67 Test MAPEP 01/09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Cobalt-57 1 1 60 1 1 16 781-1451 MAPEP 01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Cobalt-60 821 779 545-1013 MAPEP 01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Iron-55 796 680 476-884 MAPEP Manganese-01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 54 1060 1 009 706-1312 MAPEP 01/09L15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Nickel-63 924 980 686-1 274 MAPEP Plutonium-01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 238 0.92 0.48 Sens. Eva!.

MAPEP-1 4-Plutonium-01/09£15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 239/240 61.5 58.6 41.0-76.2 MAPEP Potassium-01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bg/Kg 40 879 824 577-1071 MAPEP Strontium-01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 90 891 858 601-1 1 1 5 MAPEP Technetium-01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn 99 466 589 412-766 MAPEP 01/09/15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn U-234/233 905 89 62-1 1 6 MAPEP Uranium-01/09L1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn 238 257 259 1 81 -337 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Zinc-65 605.0 541 3?9-703 MAPEP-1 4-Americium-01/09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 241 0.91 5 0.880 0.62-1.14 MAPEP-1 4-False Positive 01/09/15 MaW31 Water __

Bq/L Cesium-1 34

-0.06 Test MAPEP 01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L Cesium-1 37 1 8.4 1 8.4 1 2.9-23.9 D-1 3 Ev A

A A

A A __

A A

A A __

A A

A --

A A

A

__.6___

A A

__ _A__

A

TABLE D-5 PT Quarter I Provider Year MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /201 4 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /201 4 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /201 4 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 MAPEP 4th /2014 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 4 OF 5)

Acceptance Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Range/

Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio MAPEP 01/09/15 MaW31 Water B_q/L Cobalt-57 r-- 25 24.7 1 7.3-32.1 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 1 2.5 12.4 8.7-16.1 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 216 208 146-270 MAPEP 01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L Iron-55 34.0 31.5

22. 1-41.0 MAPEP Manganese-01/09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 54 1 4.2 14.0 9.8-18.2 MAPEP 01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 23.6 24.6 1 7.2-32.0 MAPEP Plutonium-01/09/1 5. MaW31 Water Bq/L 238 0.547 0.618 0.433-0.803 MAPEP-1 4-Plutonium-01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L 239/240 0.01 5 0.005 Sens. Eval.

MAPEP Potassium-01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L 40 1 74 161 1 1 3-209 MAPEP Strontium-False Positive 01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L 90 0.03 Test MAPEP-1 4-Technetium-01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L 99 6.92 6.99 4.89-9.09 MAPEP Uranium-01/09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 234/233 0.206 0.205 0.144-0.267 MAPEP Uranium-01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L 238 1.280 1.420 0.99-1.85 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 1 1.900 1 090 7.6-14.2 MAPEP 01/09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 0.793 0.701 0.201-1. 1 92 MAPEP 01/09/15 MaW31

_Water ___

Bq/L Gross Beta 6.220 5:94 2.97-8.91 MAPEP Uranium-0.0278-01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter uq/sample 235 0.040 0.040 0.0516 MAPEP Uranium-01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter ug/sample 238 1 9. 3 20.3 14.2-26.4 MAPEP Uranium-01/09/15 RdF31 Filter ug/sample Total 1 9.00 20.4 14.3-26.5 MAPEP Americium-0.0472-01/09/15 RdF31 Filter ug/sample 241 0.0561 0.067 0.0876 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-134 0.8640 0.96 0.67-1.25 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-137 1.1 90 1.20 0.84-1.56 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/15 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 1.540 1.43 1.00-1.86 MAPEP-1 4-01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 1.200 1.1 0 0.7'1-1.43 MAPEP Manganese-01/09/15 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 54 0.808 0.75 0.3-0.98 MAPEP Plutonium-01/09/15 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 238 0.1 1 5 0.107 0.075-0.139 MAPEP Plutonium-0.0328-01/09/15 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 239/240 0.048 0.0468 0.0608 MAPEP-1 4-Strontium-01/09/15 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 90 0.762 0.70 0.492-0.914 MAPEP-1 4-Uranium-0.0251 -

01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 234/233 0.037 0.0358 0.0465 MAPEP Uranium-0'1/09/15 RdF31

_Filter B_gfsample 238 0.227 0.253 0.1 77-0.329 MAPEP 01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 0.779 0.76 0.53-0.99 MAPEP Americium-01/09/1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 241 0.226 0.19 0.1 35-0.251 D-14 Evaluation A

A A

A

_ __h_

A A

A

TABLE D-5 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 5 OF 5)

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4!11 /2014 01/09/1!?

RdV31 Vegetation Bq/smple Cesium-134 4.750 5.20 3.64-6.67 A

MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09115 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample Ceslum-1 37 6.91 0 6.60 4.62-8.58 A

MAPEP-1 4-False Positive MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bqlsample Cobalt-57

-0.002 0.00 Test A

MAPEP False Positive MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bqlsample Cobalt-60 0.008 0.00 Test A

MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 54 7.980 7.88 5.52-10.24 A

MAPEP Plutonium-r--MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09115 RdV3'1 Vegetation Bq/sample 238 0.001 0.001 Sens. Eval.

A MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 239/240 0.1510 0.171 0.120-0.222 A

MAPEP Strontium-1-[VlAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 90 2.330 2.32 1.62-3.02 A

Uranium-0.0326-MAPEP MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 234/233 0.046 0.047 0.0606 A

MAPEP.. 1 4-Uranium-MAPEP 4th /201 4 01/09/11?

RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 238 0.332 0.324 0.227-0.421 A

MAPEP MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 2.850 2.63 1.84-3.42 A

MAPEP Strontium-MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/15 SrF-31 Filter Bq/sample 89 3.62 3.79 2.65-4.93 A

MAPEP-1 4-Strontium-r--MAF'EP 4th /2014 01/09/15 SrF-31 Filter Bq/sarnple 90 3.62 3.79 2.65-4.93 A

MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /201 4 01/09/15 XaW-31 Water Bq/L lodine-129 4.56 4.55 3.1 9-5.92 A

(1) The uranium-234/233 and uranium-238 in soil reported values wer*e lower than the MAPEP known values. It was determined that the digestion method using hydrofluoric acid (HF) was insufficient to completely digest the soil. MAPEP posted on their website that the analytes had been fused into the soil at an extremely high temperature. Reanalysis using a sodium hydroxide (NAOH) fusion method prior to ion exchange separation chemistry gave results for uraniurn-234/233 and uranium-238 that fell within the acceptance criteria (Corrective Action CARR1 40605-879).

(2) The uranium-235 in vegetation reported value was higher than the MAPEP known value. The failure was due to a hand entry error when entering the result into the MAPEP website. The activity was incorrectly entered as 0.261 ug/sample instead of the correct result of 0.0261 uglsample (Corrective Action CARR1 40605-879).

D-1 5

TABLE D-6 PT Quarter I Provider Year 1 st !

ERA 2014 1 st /

ERA 201 4 1 st !

ERA 201 4

"'"15fT""-

ERA 201 4 1 st !

ERA 201 4 1 st /

ERA 201 4 1 st !

ERA 2014 1 st /

ERA 201 4 1 st !

ERA 201 4 1 st /

ERA 201 4 1 st !

ERA 2014 1 st /

ERA 201 4 1 st /

ERA 2014 1 st /

ERA 20'14 1 st !

ERA 2014 1 st !

ERA 201 4 1 st !

ERA 2014 1 st !

ERA 2014 1 st I ERA 201 4 1 st !

ERA 201 4 1 st /

ERA 2014 1 st !

ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 2014 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 2)

Acceptance Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Ratio RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Barium-1 33 80.6 76.2 63.8-83.8 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 64.7 66.8 54.4-73.5 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1 12.0 1 09 98.1-122 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCI/L Cobalt-60 95.0 88.7 79.8-99.9 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCI/L Zlnc-65 200 1 85 1 66-218 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 34.8 36.1 1 8.6-46.4 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Gross Beta 1 9.6 22.3 1 3.5-30.4 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 34.6 36.1 1 8.6-46.4 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Radium-226 1 6.2 1 6.8 1 2.5-1 9.2 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCI/L Radium-228 4.62 5.04 3.01 -6.67 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 7.39 7.23 5.51-8.53 RAD -

Uranium 02/24/14 96 Water ug/L (Nat) mass 1 1.00 1 0.6 8.07-12.5 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Radlum-226 1 5. 1 0 1 6.8 1 2.5-1 9.2 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Radlum-228 4.66 5.04 3.01-6.67 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCI/L Uranium (Nat) 7.47 7.23 5.51 -8.53 RAD -

Uranium 02/24/14 96 Water ug/L (Nat)mass 1 1.4 1 0.6 8.07-1 2.5 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Tritium 3320 3580 3030-3950 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 44.1 44.4 34.4-51.6 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 34.2 30.3 22.1 -35.2 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 38.9 44.4 34.4-51.6 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi!L Strontium-90 27.1 30.3 22.1 -35.2 02/06/14 01 1 01 4L Water pCi/L Strontlum-89 42.3 38.7 29.3-45.7 02/06/14 01 1 01 4L Water pCi/L Strontium-89 42.2 38.7 29.3-45.7 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L lodine-1 31 25.2 24.4 20.2-28.9 RAD -

02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L lodine-1 31 22.4 24.4 20.2-28.9 RAD -

08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Barium-1 33 67.8 68.7 57.3-75.6

-w*

RAD -

08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 71 72.3 59.0-79.5 RAD -

08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1 61 1 63 147-1 81 RAD -

08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 76.7 75.5 68.0-85.5 D-1 6 Evaluation A

A A

A

_.../2_

A A

TABLE D-6 PT Quarter I Provider Year 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 t----

3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA __

201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 t--

3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I

_ERA __

201 4 3rd I ERA 2014 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 2014 3rd I A

201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 3rd I ERA 201 4 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Acceptance Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Date Number Media Unit Analvte I Nuclide Value value Ratio 08/25/14 RAD-98 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 45.3 45.4 23.6-57.4 08/25114 RAD-98 Water pCI/L Gross Alpha 45.3 45.4 23.6-57.4 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Gross Beta

32. 3 33.4 21.7-41.1 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Gross Alpha 48.6 45.4 23.6-57.4 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Radium-226 8.26 9.06 6.80-1 0.6 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Radium-226 8.54 9.06 6.80-1 0.6 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Radium-226 9.7 9.06 6.80-1 0.6 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Radium-228 5.07 5.07 3.03-6.79 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Radium-228 5.74 5.07 3.03-6.79 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Uranium (Nat) 1 3.9 1 3.5 10.7-15.4 Uranium (Nat) 08125114 RAD-98 Water ugiL mass 22.25 19.8 15.6-22.6 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Uranium (Nat) 1 3 1 3.5 10.7-1 5.4 Uranium (Nat) 08125114 RAD-98 Water ugiL mass 20.7 19.8 15.6-22.6 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Tritium 1 0200 1 1200 9750-1 2300 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Tritium 1 0400 1 1200 9750-12300 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Strontlum-89 56.3 42.7 32.9-49.8 08/25114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Strontium-90 1 4. 3 31.7 23.1-36.7 08/25114 RAD-98 Water pCIIL Strontium-89 56.5 42.7 32.9-49.8 0812511 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Strontium-90 26 31.7 23.1-36.7 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCi!L lodine-131 28.6 26.1 21.7-30.8 08125114 RAD-98 Water pCiiL lodine-131 22.3 26.1 21.7-30.8 Evaluation A

A A

Not (1)

Acceptable A

Not (1 )

Acceptable A

A A

(1) Two strontium-89 in water reported values were higher than the ERA l<nown values. The associated QC samples and instrument calibrations were reviewed but a cause for the failures could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error caused the high bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR1 40825-902).

D-1 7

TABLE 0*7 PT Quarter I Provider Year ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 I-_ ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/201 4

__ ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/201 4 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/201 4 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/201 4 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA MRAD ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 7)

Acceptance Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Date Number Media Unit Analvte I Nuclide Value value Ratio 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil

[!CI/kg Actlnlum-228 1 140 1240 795-1 720 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCI/kQ Americium-241 418 399 233-518 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-21 2 976 1 240 330-1 820 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Bismuth-214 2290 1 960 1 1 80-2820 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCI/kg Cesium-1 34 3080 3390 2220-4070 651 0-05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Cesium-1 37 831 0 8490 1 0900 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 6570 6830 4620-9400 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Lead-212 1 330 1 240 81 2-1730 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Lead-21 4 2800 2070 1 21 0-3090 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Manqanese-54

<44.3

<1 000 0-1 000 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 579 578 348-797 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 488 471.00 308-651 7660-05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kq Potassium-40 1 0500 1 0500 1 4100 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Strontium-90 2500 2780 1060-4390 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kQ Thorium-234 3420 3360 1 060-6320 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Zlnc-65 5700 5400 4300-71 80 3250-06/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6730 8530 1 3500 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/lill_

Uranium-234 2602 3390 2070-4350 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCifkq Uranium-238 2426 3360 2080-4260 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Uranium-Total 5027 691 0 3750-9120 5570-05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil UQ/kg Uranium-Total( mass) 71 1 0 10100 1 2700 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kQ Uranium-234 3440 3390 2070-4350 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 3680 3360 2080-4260 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Uranium-Total 731Q 691 0 3750-9120 5570-05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil UQ/kQ Uranium-Total(mass) 1 1 000 1 01 00 1 2700 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Uranium-234 3740 3390 2070-4350 05/1 6/"14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 3780 3360 2080-4260 05/16/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 7683 691 0 3750-9120 05/1 6/14 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 1 1 300 1 01 00 5570-MRAD 20 1 2700 0-1 8 Evaluation A

A A

_ _A._

A A

A

TABLE D-7 PT Quarter I Provider Year ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/20'1 4 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2ndl2014_

ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA 2nd/2014 ERA MRAD ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 2 OF 7)

Acceptance Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Date Number Media Unit Analvte I Nuclide Value value Ratio MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Soil UQ/kQ Uranium-Total(mass) 1 1200 101 00 5570-12700 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 VeQetation oCi/kQ Am-241 1 670 1490 91 1-1 980 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 VeQetation pCi/kQ Am-241 1 670 1490 91 1-1 980 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-1 34 657 646 41 5-839 MRAD:..2o 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-1 37 861 880 638-1220 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 VeQetation oCi/kQ Cobalt-60 997 926 639-1290 MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Veaetation oCi/ka Curium-244 514 516 253-804 MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 VeQetation pCi/kg Manganese-54

<62.2

<300 0.00-300 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 VeQetation pCi/kg Plutonium-238 2230 2 1 1 0 1260-2890 MRAD -20 05/16/14 Vegetation pCi/kQ Plutonium-239 381 0 3740 2300-5150 MRAD 23000-05/1 6/14

- 20 VeQetation oCi/kQ Potassium-40 30800 31 900 44800 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetatiop pCi/kQ Strontium-90 2330 2580 1470-3420 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 1 920 1 760 1 1 60-2260 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 1 970 1750 1 1 70-2220 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetatio[l pCi/kQ Uranium-Total 4025 3580 2430-4460 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 5920 5240

, __ }51 0-6650 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 elation pCi/kg Zinc-65 1030 919 663-1290 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 1 730 1760 1 1 60-2260 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Veaetation PCi/kQ Uranium-238 2000 1750 1 1 70-2220 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kQ Uranium-Total 381 7 3580 2430-4460 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation UQ/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 5990 5240 351 0-6650 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Vegetation ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass}

5620 5240 351 0-6650 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241

_ _!30.2 59.7 36.8-80.8 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-1 34 920 1010 643-1250 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter pCi/Filter Ceslum-1 37 816 828 622-1090 MRAD -20 05/16/14 Filter j)Ci/Filter Cobalt-60 1 1 30 1 120 867-1400 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter oCi/Filter Iron-55 254 240 74.4-469 MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter I oCi/Filter Manganese-54

<6.64

<50.0 0-50.0 MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4

_filter I pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 51.3 56.3 38.6-74.0 MRAD -20 05/16/14 Filter I pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 47.5 48.6 35.2-63.5 MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Filter I oCi/Filter Strontium-90 76.7 78.9 38.6-1 1 8 MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Filter I pCi/Filter Uranium-234 33.8 36.4 22.6-54 05/1 6/1 4 MRAD-20 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 34.5 36.1 23.3-49.9 D-1 9 Evaluation A

A A

TABLE D-7 PT Provider ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA

-RA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA ERA

-RA-Quarter I Year 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/201 4 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2nd/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/201 4 2"d/2014 2"d/201 4 2"d/201 4 2"d/201 4 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/2014 2"d/201 4 2"d/201 4 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES Report Sample Sample Date Number Media MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter MRAD -20 05/16/14 Filter MRAD -20 05/16/14 Filter MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter

-MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Filter MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Filter MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Filter MRAD -20 05/16/1 4 Filter MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Water MRAD -20 05/)6/14 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Water MRAD 05/1 6/14 Water MRAD -20 05/16/14 Water MRAD -20 05/16/14 Water MRAD -20 05/16/14 Water MRAD -20 05/16/1 4 Water MRAD -20 05/16/1 4 Water MRAD -20 05/16/14 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/14 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Water MRAD -20 05/1 6/1 4 Water MRAD -20 05/16/1 4 Water MRAD -20 05/16/14 Water MRAD -20 05/16/14 Water 05/1 6/14 MRAD -20 Water (PAGE 3 OF 7)

Unit oCi/Filter ug/Filter pCi/Filter pCI/FIIter oCi/Filter pCi/Filter ug/Filter ug/Filter

_pCi/Filter oCi/Filter pCI/L pCI/L pCi/L pCi/L

_t&j/L

_pCI/_L

_p_Qi/L __

pCI/L pCI/_1,.

pCi/L

_12_Ci/L pCi/L ug/L pCi/L pCi/L

_Q_Ci/L pCi/L u9L!:__

pCi/L

_!&l{h__

pCI/L D-20 Analyte I Nuclide Uranium-Total Uranium-Totallmass)

Zinc-65 Uranlum-234 Uranium-238 Uranium-Total Uranium-Total(mass)

Uranlum-Total(mass)

Gross AIQ_ha Gross Beta Arnericium-241 Cesium-134 Cesium-1 37 Cobalt-60 Iron-55 Manganese-54 Plutonium-238 Plutonium-239 Strontium-90 Uranlum-234 Uranium-238 Uranium-Total Uranium-Total(mass)

Zinc-65 Uranium-234 Uranium-238 Uranium-Total Uranium-Total(mass)

Uranium-234 Uranium-238 Uranium-Total GEL Known Value value 70.3 74.3 1 04 1 08 737 667 35.5 36.4 35.3 36.1 72.4 74.3 1 05 1 08 1 00 1 08 60.9 46 58.9 53.8 1 86 1 1 4 1 540 1 660 2760 2690 1 320 -- 1270 1 230 1 200

<7.54

<1 00 37 44 1 24 1 60 95 890 77.8 82.4 50.8 48.4

_:156

__ 1 68 233 245 2030 1 800 82.1 82.4 84.6 48.4 1 "10 1 68 253 __ 1-- 245 80.5 82.4 90.0 48.4 1 75 1 68 Acceptance Range/

Ratio Evaluation 41. 1 -1 1 3 A

69.1-152 A

478-921 A

22.6-54 A

23.3-49.9 A

41. 1 -1 1 3 A

69. 1 -1 52 A

69.1-152 A

1 5.4-71.4 A

34.0-78.4 A

Not (1 )

76.8-153 Acceptable 1 220-1 910 A

2280-3220 A

1 1 00-1 490 A

716-1 630 A

0.00-100 A

32.6-54.9 A

124-202 A

580-1 1 80 A

61.9-1 06 A

36.9-59.4 A

1 23-217 A

1 95-296 A

1500-2270 A

61.9-1 06 A

36.9-59.4 A

1 23-217 A

1 95-296 A __

61.9-1 06 A

36.9-59.4 A

1 23-217 A

TABLE D-7

---*-n PT Quarter I Provider Year ERA 2"d/2014 E RA 2"d/2014 ERA 2"d/2014 ERA 2"d/2014 ERA 2"d/2014 ERA 2"d/2014 ERA 2"d/2014 ERA 2"d/2014 ERA 2"d/2014 3ru /

ERA 2014 3rar ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 2014 ERA 201 4 3ru /

ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 2014 3ru /

ERA 2014 3ru /

ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 2014 3r /

ERA 2014 3r /

ERA 2014 3 I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 201 4 3r r-ERA 2014 3 I ERA 2014 3r r-ERA 2014 3r /

ERA 2014 3r /

ERA 2014 3'd I ERA 2014 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 4 OF 7)

Report Sample Sample GEL Known Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value MRAD-05/1 6/14 20 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 269 245 MRAD-05/1 6/14 20 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 77.8 82.4 MRAD-05/16/14 20 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 78.3 48.4 MRAD-05/16/14 20 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 156 1 68 MRAD-05/16/14 20 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 233 245 MRAD-05/16/1 4 20 Water ug/L Uranium-Total( mass) 232 245 MRAD-05/1 6/14 20 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 1 41.0 1 33 MRAD-05/16/14 20 Water pCI/L Gross Beta 1 72 1 74.0 MRAD-05/1 6/14 20 Water pCi/L Tritium 5280 5580 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1280 1240 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 825 763 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-212 1 620 1240 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-214 2900 281 0 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCI/kg Cesium-134 1 960 2140 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-1 37 6760 6550 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 4480 4260 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Lead-212 1 260 1240 MRAD-1 1/25/1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Lead-214 3480 2750 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54

<30.0

<1 000 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 732 739 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 281 309 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCI/kg Potassium-40 1 1 500 10700 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCI/kg Strontium-90 8790 8420 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Thorlum-234 2000 2350 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 391 0 3270 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2280 2370 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Uranlum-238 2340 2350 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4762 4540 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 7020 7050 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Vegetation pCi/kg Am-241 2260 2290 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 837 849 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-1 37 729 644 D-21 Acceptance Range/

Ratio Evaluation 1 95-296 A

61.9-106 A

36.9-59.4 A

1 23-217 A

1 95-296 A

47.2-206 A __

99.6-258 A

3740-7960 A

795-1 720 A

431-956 A

330-1820 A

1 690-4040 A

1400-2570 A

5020-8430 A

2880-5860 A

812-1 730 A

161 0-4100 A

0-1 000 A

444-1 020 A

202-427 A

7810-14400 A

3210-1 3300 A

743-4420 A

2600-4350 A

1450-3040 A

1450-2980 A

2360-6390 A

3890-8870 A

1400-3505 A

545-1 100 A

467-896 A

TABLE D-7 PT Quarter I Provider Year 3'" I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 2014 ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 2014 1----

3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 2014 3 I ERA 2014 3 I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 2014 3' I

____E_

201 4 3' I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 2014 3 I ERA 2014 3 I ERA 201 4 3' I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA _.

2014 3'" I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 2014 3'" I ERA 2014 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 5 OF 7)

Report Sample Sample GEL Known Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Vegetation pCilkg Cobalt-60 818 784 MRAD-1 1/25114 21 Vegetation pCi/kg Curlum-244 361 367 MRAD-1 1/2511 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Manganese-54

<25.3

<300 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Vegetation pCIIkg Plutonium-238 886 862 MRAD-1 112511 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Plutonium-239 675 701 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCIIkg Potassium-40 35300 30900 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCilkg Strontium-90 1230 1 71 0 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-234 1 980 1 780 MRAD-1 1125/14 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-238

1 970 1 760 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-Total 4038 3620 MRAD-1 1/25114 21 Vegetation uglkg Uranium-Total( mass) 591 0 5280 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-234 1 670 1 780 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCIIkg Uranlum-238 1 800 1 760 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCi!kg Uranium-Total 3556 3620 MRAD-1 112511 4 21 Vegetation uglkg Uranium-Total(mass) 5390 5280 MRAD-Acceptance Range/

Ratio 541 -1 1 00 1 80-572 0-300 514-1 180 430-965 22300-43400 975-2270 1 1 70-2290 1 1 70-2240 2450-451 0 3540-671 0 1 1 70-2290 1 1 70-2240 2450-451 0 3540-671 0 1 1125114 21 Vegetation uglkg Uranium-Total(mass) 5860 5280 -

3540-671 0 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Vegetation pCilkg Zinc-65 1 930 1 570 1 1 30-2200 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCi!Filter Americium-241 41.4 38.6 23.8-52.2 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCi!Filter Cesium-134 742 765.0 487-949 MRAD-1 1/25114 21 Filter pCIIFilter Cesium-1 37 677 647 486-850 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFilter Cobalt-60 543 523 405-653 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFIIter Iron-55 1 1 7 1 20.0 37.2-234 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFilter Manganese-54

<5.87

<50 0.00-50.0 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter ugiFIIter Plutonium-238 32.9 35.7 24.5-46.9 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFilter Plutonium-239 26.8 29.1 21 ' 1 -38.0 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFilter Strontium-90 1 87 168

82. 1 -252 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCIIFIIter Uranium-234 26 28 27.8-41.9 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFilter Uranium-238 28 27.60

__ 1 7.8-38.2 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFIIter Uranium-Total 56 57 31.4-86.3 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter ugiFIIter Uranium-Total(mass) 82.6 82.7 52.9-1 1 6 MRAD-1 1125114 21 Filter pCiiFilter Zinc-65 629 547 392-755 D-22 Evaluation A

A A

TABLE D-7 PT Quarter I Provider Year 3' I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 201 4 3' I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 201 4 3' I ERA 201 4 3 ' I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3ru /

ERA 201 4 3' I ERA 201 4 --

3'" I ERA 201 4 3 ' I ERA 201 4 3m I ERA 201 4 3'0 /

ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'u /

ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3ru /

ERA 201 4 3 I ERA 201 4 3'" I E RA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 3'" I ERA 201 4 ERA 3rd I ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 6 OF 7)

Report Sample Sample GEl.

Known Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Filter l pCi/Filte Uranlum-234 28 28 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Filter pCi/Filte Uranium-238 25 27.60 MRAD-1 1/25/1 4 21 Filter pCi/Filte Uranium-Total 55 57 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass)

75. 1 82.7 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 90.7 82.7 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Filter pCi/Filte Gross Alpha 47.4 36.9 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Filter pCi/Filte Gross Beta 27.2 2 1. 1 MRAD-

-* 1 1/25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L Americium-241 72.4 68.6 MRAD-1 1/25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 816.0 850 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1310 1 240 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1 1 30 1 070 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Iron-55 1 30 1 34 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Manganese-54

<6.34

<1 00 MRAD-

" 11/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 35 33 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 46.4 51 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 300 254 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 42 44 MRAD-1 1/25/1 4 21 Water pCI/L Uranlum-238 50 43.50 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 92 89 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 1 37 1 30 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCI/L Zinc-65 1 070 921 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 43 44 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 45 43.50 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 90 89 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water ug/L Uranium-Total( mass) 1 34 1 30 MRAD-1 1/25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 49 44 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 42 43.50 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 93 89 MRAD-1 1/25/14 21 Water

__ ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 1 26 1 30 MRAD-1 1/25/1 4 21 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 1 44 1 30 MRAD-1 1/25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 96.2 98 1 1/25/14 MRAD-Water pCi/L Gross Beta 86.1 77.5 D-23 Acceptance Range/

Ratio Evaluation 27.8-41.9 A

1 7.8-38.2 A

31.4-86.3 A

52.9-1 16 A

1 2.4-57.3 A

1 3.3-30.8 A

46.2-92.0 624-977 A

1 060-1 490 A

930-1 250 A

79.9-1 82 A

0.00-100 A

24.6-41.4 A

39.7-64.4 A

1 65-336 A

32.9-56.5 A

33.2-53.4

_A__

65.5-1 15 A

104-157 A

768-1 160 A

32.9-56.5 A

33.2-53.4 A

65.5-1 15 A

1 04-157 A

32.9-56.5 A

33.2-53.4 A

65.5-1 1 5 1 04-157 A

104-157 A

34.8-1 52 A

44.4-1 1 5 A

TABLE D-7 PT Quarter I Provider Year 3'" I ERA 2014 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 7 OF 7)

Report Sample Sample GEL Known Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value MRAD 1 1/25/14

-21 Water pCi/L Tritium 5490 5500 Acceptance Range/

Ratio Evaluation 3680-7840 A

(1 )

The americium-241 in water reported value was higher than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error caused the high bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR1 40520-874).

D-24

LR-N15-0081, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

LR-N15-0081, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search