Inadequate Net Positive Suction Head of Emergency Core Cooling and Containment Heat Removal Pumps Under Design Basis Accident ConditionsML031050598 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant ![Entergy icon.png](/w/images/7/79/Entergy_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
10/22/1996 |
---|
From: |
Martin T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
IN-96-055, NUDOCS 9610150005 |
Download: ML031050598 (11) |
|
Similar Documents at Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant |
---|
Category:NRC Information Notice
MONTHYEARInformation Notice 2020-02, Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges2020-09-15015 September 2020 Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges ML20225A0322020-09-0303 September 2020 NRC Choice Letter to NAC International with Attached Safety Inspection Report, IR 0721015/2020201, February 24-27, 2020 and July 22, 2020, Inspection of NAC International in Norcross, Georgia Information Notice 2012-09, PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs.2019-11-30030 November 2019 PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs. Information Notice 2011-20, NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011)2019-07-24024 July 2019 NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011) ML19196A2452019-07-15015 July 2019 Public Notice - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Exigent Amendment to Facility Operating License Information Notice 2019-01, Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations2019-03-12012 March 2019 Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations ML16028A3082016-04-27027 April 2016 NRC Information Notice; IN 2016-05: Operating Experience Regarding Complications From a Loss of Instrumentation Air Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2013-20, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-20, Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-11, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2013-11, Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Contain2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Con2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notic2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-11, Age Related Capacitor Degradation2012-07-23023 July 2012 Age Related Capacitor Degradation ML12031A0132012-02-0606 February 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Investigation Report No. 2-2010-058, Cpn International, Inc Information Notice 2011-19, Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components2011-09-26026 September 2011 Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components Information Notice 2011-15, Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues2011-08-0101 August 2011 Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues Information Notice 2011-17, Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping2011-07-26026 July 2011 Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-04, IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-262010-12-21021 December 2010 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 ML13066A1872009-12-16016 December 2009 Draft NRC Information Notice 2009-xx - Underestimate of Dam Failure Frequency Used in Probabilistic Risk Assessments ML1007804482009-11-23023 November 2009 Email from Peter Bamford, NRR to Pamela Cowan, Exelon on TMI Contamination Control Event Information Notice 2009-11, NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-112009-07-0707 July 2009 NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-11 Information Notice 2009-10, Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10)2009-07-0707 July 2009 Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10) Information Notice 2009-09, Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify2009-06-19019 June 2009 Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify Information Notice 2008-12, Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation2008-07-0707 July 2008 Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation Information Notice 2008-11, Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 12008-06-18018 June 2008 Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 1 Information Notice 2008-04, Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants2008-04-0707 April 2008 Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants Information Notice 1991-09, Counterfeiting of Crane Valves2007-09-25025 September 2007 Counterfeiting of Crane Valves Information Notice 2007-28, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls2007-09-19019 September 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls Information Notice 2007-29, Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment2007-09-17017 September 2007 Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment Information Notice 2007-14, Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station2007-03-30030 March 2007 Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station Information Notice 2007-06, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems2007-02-0909 February 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Information Notice 2007-05, Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures2007-02-0909 February 2007 Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures Information Notice 2006-31, Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers2006-12-26026 December 2006 Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-13, E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination2006-07-13013 July 2006 E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination 2020-09-03 The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>.
[Table view]The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>. |
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 22, 1996 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 96-55: INADEQUATE NET POSITIVE SUCTION HEAD OF
EMERGENCY CORE COOLING AND CONTAINMENT
HEAT REMOVAL PUMPS UNDER DESIGN BASIS
ACCIDENT CONDITIONS
Addressees
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors.
Purpose
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
addressees to recent discoveries by licensees that the available net positive suction head
(NPSH) requirements for emergency core cooling system (ECCS) and containment heat
removal pumps may not be adequate under all postulated design basis scenarios. It is
expected that recipients will review the information for applicability to their facilities and
consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained
in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written
response is required.
Description of Circumstances
Haddam Neck
Insufficient NPSH for Residual Heat Removal Pumps (ECCS Recirculation Mode)
In November 1986, the Haddam Neck licensee determined that the existing NPSH analysis
for the residual heat removal (RHR) pumps was in error. This analysis indicated that
containment pressure in excess of the saturation pressure corresponding to the temperature
of the sump fluid was not needed to satisfy NPSH requirements for the RHR pumps in the
recirculation mode of ECCS operation. The revised analysis conducted to correct the error
indicated, however, that credit for containment pressure above pre-event condition was
necessary to satisfy RHR pump NPSH requirements for recirculation operation.
A re-analysis conducted by the licensee in 1995 to reflect changing plant conditions indicated
that a required containment overpressure that was a significant fraction of peak calculated
containment design pressure was necessary to meet NPSH requirements. Key assumptions
of the analysis were minimum design basis heat removal conditions, including minimum
service water flow, maximum service water temperature, and maximum fouling of the
r 96101350005 pt E CooTlcaS
9a 220
IN 96-55 October 22, 1996 containment air coolers. A primary concern of the staff was the fact that the containment
overpressure relied upon was significantly greater than any previously approved calculation.
On August 30, 1996, in Licensee Event Report 50-213/96-016, Accession Number
9609090320, the licensee stated that calculations performed in August 1996, to determine
the available NPSH to the RHR pumps operating in recirculation mode may not be adequate
under all postulated design basis scenarios. The licensee indicated that the assumption of
sufficient containment overpressure to meet NPSH requirements used in previous analyses
could not be supported since recent sump temperature analyses cannot assure that the
necessary containment overpressure would be available. In particular, for the preferred
recirculation flow path, the necessary overpressure would be approximately 136kPa [5 psig]
and would exist for the duration of the transient. However, an alternate recirculation flow
path exists which is more restrictive, thus the necessary overpressure is greater and would
be unlikely to exist for the duration of short-term (single path) recirculation. The altemate path
exists to mitigate a potential failure of the preferred path.
The licensee attributed the apparent cause of the inadequate NPSH available to the failure to
fully analyze containment pressure and sump temperature response to support the NPSH
calculation. The licensee intends to replace the piping between the containment sump and
the RHR pump suction with larger diameter piping to reduce the frictional losses so that
containment overpressure will not be relied on to satisfy NPSH requirements for the pumps.
Insufficient NPSH for Charging Pumps (ECCS Recirculation Mode) due to Inadequate
Procedures
Another issue at Haddam Neck was reported on April 12, 1996, in Licensee Event Report
50-213/96-06, Accession Number 9604190045, which involves inadequate NPSH for a single
centrifugal charging pump when the pump suction is aligned to the discharge of the RHR
pumps. The postulated scenario would occur for a design basis loss of coolant accident
(LOCA) during the switchover to ECCS sump recirculation from the refueling water storage
tank (RWST) for the purpose of long-term recirculation cooling, with offsite power and only
one of the two centrifugal charging pumps available. With one of the charging pumps
unavailable, the available pump would generate all of the flow, thereby requiring a greater
NPSH. The licensee determined that under these conditions, the currently allowable
minimum RWST volume specified in the emergency response procedures would be
insufficient to provide the required NPSH as RWST level decreases during the switchover.
The licensee attributed the cause of the potential inadequate NPSH available to an error in
the analysis supporting the applicable emergency response procedures. The minimum
allowable RWST volume was based on providing sufficient NPSH and protecting against
vortex air ingestion for the high pressure injection pumps. The licensee incorrectly
assumed that these requirements were more limiting than any associated with the charging
pumps. Corrective actions included revising the emergency response procedures to
v1- 'mat..
.
IN 96-55 October 22, 1996 caution the plant operators of the potential for charging pump cavitation and to advise the
operators to reduce charging pump flow.
Maine Yankee
Insufficient NPSH for Containment Spray Pumps (Sump Recirculation Mode)
Calculations performed in 1995 by the licensee for Maine Yankee indicate a worst case
condition where the available NPSH for the containment spray (CS) pumps would be
approximately 0.21m [0.7 ft] below the required NPSH specified by the manufacturer (4.66m
[15.3 ft] at 0.25m3/s [3900 gpm]) for the first five minutes following the switchover of pump
suction from the RWST to the recirculation sump after a design basis LOCA.
In light of these recent calculations, the licensee discussed the results of the 1995 analysis
with the pump manufacturer to assess the impact of the results on long- and short-term pump
reliability. The manufacturer agreed with the licensee's engineers that the pumps would not
be damaged during the five minute transient where minimum NPSH conditions exist and
would operate reliably following the transient. In support of this assessment, the licensee
cited various tests conducted by the manufacturer which show: (1) that similar pumps are
routinely operated at up to 50-percent degraded NPSH conditions for 1-3 minutes without
sustaining damage; (2)the installed CS pumps at Maine Yankee could operate indefinitely
with an available NPSH of 4.45m [14.6 ft] at 0.25m 3/s [3900 gpmj without an adverse impact
on mechanical integrity; and (3) the installed pumps could operate for up to 15 minutes with
an available NPSH of 3.47m [11.4 ft] at 0.25m3 /s [3900 gpm] with no impact on mechanical
integrity or long-term hydraulic performance.
The licensee concluded that the CS pumps remain capable of performing under postulated
LOCA conditions and that their NPSH calculations accurately reflect sump temperature at the
time CS pump suction is switched from the RWST to the recirculation sump. The staff has
not yet completed its evaluation of the licensee's analysis.
Crystal River Unit 3
Insufficient NPSH for Low Pressure Injection Pumps (ECCS Recirculation Mode) due to
Inadequate Procedures
On March 22, 1995, the licensee for Crystal River, Unit 3, indicated that for a given ECCS
configuration, it is procedurally possible to have inadequate NPSH for a low pressure
injection (LPI) pump during design basis LOCAs, potentially resulting in LPI pump cavitation.
The configuration consists of one LPI pump suction aligned to the reactor building sump with
its discharge directed to the reactor vessel, while the same pump simultaneously provides
flow to both high pressure injection pumps delivering their maximum flowrates. The
configuration would occur as a result of the Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs)
directing plant operators to cross-connect the high pressure injection piping when only one of
the two LPI pumps is available. With just one LPI pump supplying both high pressure
IN 96-55 October 22, 1996 injection pumps, the flow through the LPI pump would increase, resulting in a required NPSH
greater than that available from the sump. The problem would not exist if the single LPI
pump were supplying both high pressure injection pumps from the borated water storage
tank.
The licensee indicated that the cause of the event was a procedural discrepancy resulting
from insufficient review during the EOP change process. The change to allow one LPI pump
to be aligned to both charging pumps was not reviewed in terms of NPSH since it was not
thought that the flow demand of the available LPI pump would significantly increase. Prior to
the change, the EOPs directed that two LPI pumps be aligned to the high pressure injection
pumps. The EOPs were revised to address the concem.
Discussion
It is important that the emergency core cooling and containment spray system pumps have
adequate NPSH available for all design basis accident conditions such that the systems can
reliably perform their intended functions under these conditions. Inadequate NPSH could
cause voiding in the pumped fluid, resulting in pump cavitation, vapor binding, and potential
common mode failure of the pumps. Such failure would result in the inability of the ECCS
system to provide adequate long-term core cooling and/or the inability of the containment
sprays to maintain the containment pressure and temperature to within design limits. Loss of
the containment spray pumps would also reduce the ability to scrub fission products from
containment atmosphere following a LOCA, and damage to ECCS or CS pump seals from
elevated fluid temperatures and cavitation induced vibration could result in increased leakage
of coolant outside containment.
For the analyses used to determine the available NPSH, NRC Regulatory Guide 1.1, "Net
Positive Suction Head for Emergency Core Cooling and Containment Heat Removal System
Pumps," issued November 2, 1970, establishes the regulatory position that ECCS and
containment heat removal system pumps should be designed so that adequate NPSH is
available assuming maximum expected temperatures of pumped fluids and no increase in
containment pressure from that present prior to postulated LOCAs. Because containment
pressure can vary considerably depending on the accident scenario, the staff concluded in
the Regulatory Guide that sufficient NPSH should be available for all postulated coolant
accidents without crediting containment overpressure.
However, in the past, the staff has selectively allowed limited credit for a containment
pressure slightly above the vapor pressure of the sump fluid (i.e., an overpressure) on a
case-by-case basis for satisfying NPSH requirements. In these cases, licensees have
typically been requested to calculate the peak containment pressure resulting from the most
limiting design basis LOCA using the models described in Branch Technical Position CSB
6-1. The models in CSB 6-1 includes such provisions as maximizing heat transfer
coefficients to containment heat sinks, maximizing the containment free volume, and mixing
of subcooled ECCS water with steam in the containment, all of which effectively maximize
heat transfer from the containment atmosphere, thereby minimizing the calculated
IN 96-55 October 22, 1996 containment pressure and resulting in a conservative overpressure. Generally speaking, this
minimum overpressure is substantially greater than the needed overpressure for assuring
adequate NPSH.
With regard to those cases where plant procedures would have directed system
configurations resulting in inadequate NPSH, the staff stresses the importance of ensuring
that the actions and the results of actions directed by the procedures do not result in
situations where safety-related equipment would be incapable of performing its intended
function, or of performing in a non-degraded manner.
The events described herein highlight the importance of ensuring sufficient available NPSH
for ECCS and containment heat removal system pumps for the applicable spectrum of
postulated LOCAs or secondary/main steam line breaks, such that the ability for long-term
core cooling and containment heat removal are not compromised. It is important that
licensees know the NPSH requirements of the pumps and the bases on which the NPSH
available is considered adequate under a spectrum of primary and secondary break sizes
and locations. It is also important that licensees know the containment heat removal
conditions assumed in these analyses. If credit has been taken for a containment over- pressure above the vapor pressure of the sump fluid, it is important for licensees to know the
basis for the amount of overpressure credited, including the modeling assumptions of the
analysis used to determine it. Finally, system configurations that result from following plant
procedures should not result in situations where the NPSH available would be inadequate
under design basis accident conditions.
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
listed below of the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
J Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: Howard Dawson, NRR
(301) 415-3138 Email: hfd@nrc.gov
William Long, NRR
(301) 415-3026 Email: wol@nrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
Attachment
IN 96-55 October 22, 1996 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
Information Date of
Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to
96-54 Vulnerability of Stainless 10/17/96 All materials licensees
Steel to Corrosion When
Sensitized
96-53 Retrofit to Amersham 660 10/15/96 All industrial radio- Posilock Radiography graphy licensees
Camera to Correct Incon- sistency in 10 CFR Part 34 Compatibility
95-04, Excessive Cooldown 10/11/96 All holders of OLs or CPs
Supp. 1 and Depressurization and vendors for nuclear
of the Reactor Coolant power reactors
System Following Loss
of Offsite Power
96-40, Deficiencies in 10/07/96 All holders of OLs or CPs
Supp. 1 Material Dedication for nuclear power reactors
and Procurement
Practices and in
Audits of Vendors
96-52 Cracked Insertion 09/26/96 All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Rods on Troxler Commission portable gauge
Model 3400 Series licensees and vendors
Portable Moisture
Density Gauges
92-68, Potentially Sub- 09/16/96 All holders of OLs or CPs
Supp. 1 standard Slip-On, for nuclear power reactors
Welding Neck, and
Blind Flanges
OL = Operating License
CP = Construction Permit
IN 96-55 October22, 1996 containment pressure and resulting in a conservative overpressure. Generally speaking, this
minimum overpressure is substantially greater than the needed overpressure for assuring
adequate NPSH.
With regard to those cases where plant procedures would have directed system
configurations resulting in inadequate NPSH, the staff stresses the importance of ensuring
that the actions and the results of actions directed by the procedures do not result in
situations where safety-related equipment would be incapable of performing its intended
function, or of performing in a non-degraded manner.
The events described herein highlight the importance of ensuring sufficient available NPSH
for ECCS and containment heat removal system pumps for the applicable spectrum of
postulated LOCAs or secondary/main steam line breaks, such that the ability for long-term
core cooling and containment heat removal are not compromised. It is important that
licensees know the NPSH requirements of the pumps and the bases on which the NPSH
available is considered adequate under a spectrum of primary and secondary break sizes
and locations. It is also important that licensees know the containment heat removal
conditions assumed in these analyses. If credit has been taken for a containment over- pressure above the vapor pressure of the sump fluid, it is important for licensees to know the
basis for the amount of overpressure credited, including the modeling assumptions of the
analysis used to determine it. Finally, system configurations that result from following plant
procedures should not result in situations where the NPSH available would be inadequate
under design basis accident conditions.
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
listed below of the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: Howard Dawson, NRR William Long, NRR
(301) 415-3138 (301) 415-3026 Email: hfd@nrc.gov Email: wol@nrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
Tech Editor reviewed and concurred on
DOCUMENT NAME: 96-55.IN
To receive a copy of this document, bidicate I the box: 'C' - Copy wlo
ettachmenVenclosure 'E' - Copy w/attachment/enclosure 'N' - No copy
OFFICE
CONTACT
S I C/PECB:DRPM D/DRPM
NAME HDawson* AChaffee Jr TMartin
WLong*j_
DATE 09/23/96 10//5/96 R D 10/
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY .
IN 96-55 October 21, 1996 containment pressure and resulting in a conservative overpressure. Generally speaking, this
minimum overpressure is substantially greater than the needed overpressure for assuring
adequate NPSH.
With regard to those cases where plant procedures would have directed system
configurations resulting in inadequate NPSH, the staff stresses the importance of ensuring
that the actions and the results of actions directed by the procedures do not result in
situations where safety-related equipment would be incapable of performing its intended
function, or of performing in a non-degraded manner.
The events described herein highlight the importance of ensuring sufficient available NPSH
for ECCS and containment heat removal system pumps for the applicable spectrum of
postulated LOCAs or secondary/main steam line breaks, such that the ability for long-term
core cooling and containment heat removal are not compromised. It is important that
licensees know the NPSH requirements of the pumps and the bases on which the NPSH
available is considered adequate under a spectrum of primary and secondary break sizes
and locations. It is also important that licensees know the containment heat removal
conditions assumed in these analyses. If credit has been taken for a containment over- pressure above the vapor pressure of the sump fluid, it is important for licensees to know the
basis for the amount of overpressure credited, including the modeling assumptions of the
analysis used to determine it. Finally, system configurations that result from following plant
procedures should not result in situations where the NPSH available would be inadequate
under design basis accident conditions.
This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about the information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
listed below of the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: Howard Dawson, NRR William Long, NRR
(301) 415-3138 (301) 415-3026 Email: hfdenrc.gov Email: wol@nrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
Tech Editor reviewed and concurred on
DOCUMENT NAME: 96-55.IN
To receive a copy ofthisdocument dIclete I thebox: 'C' - Copy w/o
attachment/enclosure 'E' - Copy w/attachmentlenclosure 'N' - No copy
OFFICE
CONTACT
S C/PECB:DRPM l /DRPM
NAME HDawson* TAChaffee % TMartin
WLong* l
DATE 09/23/96 10/iS796 10/ /96 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
IN 96-55 October 18, 1996 containment pressure and resulting in a conservative overpressure. General peaking, this
minimum overpressure is substantially greater than the needed overpress e for assuring
adequate NPSH.
With regard to those cases where plant procedures would have dircted system
configurations resulting in inadequate NPSH, the staff stresses t importance of ensuring
that the actions and the results of actions directed by the pro dures do not result in
situations where safety-related equipment would be incapab of performing its intended
function, or of performing in a non-degraded manner.
The events described herein highlight the importance f ensuring sufficient available NPSH
for ECCS and containment heat removal system p ps for the applicable spectrum of
postulated LOCAs or secondary/main steam line reaks, such that the ability for long-term
core cooling and containment heat removal ar ot compromised. It is important that
licensees know the NPSH requirements of t pumps and the bases on which the NPSH
available is considered adequate under a of primary and secondary break sizes
nectrm
and locations. It is also important that Ii nsees know the containment heat removal
conditions assumed in these analyses. f credit has been taken for a containment over- pressure above the vapor pressure the sump fluid, it is important for licensees to know the
basis for the amount of overpressu credited, including the modeling assumptions of the
analysis used to determine it. Firily, system configurations that result from following plant
procedures should not result in ituations where the NPSH available would be inadequate
under design basis accident nditions.
This information notice re ires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about the info ation in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts
listed below of the ap priate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Thomas T. Martin, Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical co acts: Howard Dawson, NRR William Long, NRR
(301) 415-3138 (301) 415-3026 Email: hfdenrc.gov Email: wolenrc.gov
Attachmnt: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
Tech Editor r viewed and concurred on
DOCUMENT NA: 96-55.IN
To receive a copy othis document. Indicate In the box: 'C- - Copy w/o
attachment/enclosure 'E' - Copy wlattachmentlenclosure 'N' - No copy ;
OFFICE
CONTACT
S C/PECB:DRPD/DRPM
NAME HDawson* AChaffe TMartin
____WLong* - _________
DATE 09/23/96 10/1i/96 10/ /96 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
vc)
IN 96- September , 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written res se. If you have any
questions about the information in this notice, please conta ne of the technical contacts
listed below of the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor gulation (NRR) project manager.
omas T. Martin, Director
ivision of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: Howard Daw n, NRR
(301) 415 138 Email: denrc.gov
Wili Long, NRR
(3 ) 415-3026 ail: wol@nrc.gov
Attachment: List o ecently Issued NRC Information Notices
DOCUMENT N E: G:MEJB1\NPSH.IN
To receive a opy of this document, Indicate In the box: "C" = Copy without
attachment closure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N"= No copy
OFFICE ,ontactsi BCSS:SA DIDSSAJ ICPECB:DRPM IDIDRPmL
NAMEA HDawson* CBerlinger* GHolahan* AChaffee TMartin
WLong*
/ /96 / /96 DAT 09/23/96
09/23/96
/
09123/96
109/30/96 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
_ __
IN99 Se ember XX, 1996 ge 6 of 6 This information notice requires no specific action or ritten response. If
you have any questions about the information in this otice. please contact
one of the technical contacts listed below of the propriate Office of
Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Th s T. Martin, Director
Di ision of Reactor Program Management
fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contacts: Howard Daws , NRR
(301)415- 38 Internet fd@nrc.gov
Willi Long, NRR
(301 415-3026 In rnet:wol@nrc.gov
DOCUME NAME: G:\EJB1\NPSH.IN
To r ieve a copy of this document. indicate in the box: "C"= Copy without
attrhment/enclosure "E"= Copy with attachment/enclosure "N"= No copy
OFFICE Contacts;4_,, 11 BC/SCSB:DSSA BC/SRXB:DSSA D/DSSA
NAME HDawson -CBe RJones T H n
DATE
.KWong wo
q / 3/96 a l-
9 xX
M)k\-1 zes9<6 j _ _
/_/96 _/96_l
OFFICE C/PECB:DRPM D/DRPM lI. I L
NAME ACHaffee TMartin
DATE / /96 / /96 / /96 96 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
|
---|
|
list | - Information Notice 1996-01, Potential For High Post-Accident Closed-Cycle Cooling Water Temperatures to Disable Equipment Important to Safety (3 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-01, Potential for High Post-Accident Closed-Cycle Cooling Water Temperatures to Disable Equipment Important to Safety (3 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-02, Inoperability of Power-Operated Relief Valves Masked by Downstream Indications During Testing (5 January 1996, Topic: Stroke time)
- Information Notice 1996-03, Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoint Variation as a Result of Thermal Effects (5 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-03, Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoint Variation As a Result of Thermal Effects (5 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-04, Incident Reporting Requirements for Radiography Licensees (10 January 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-05, Partial Bypass of Shutdown Cooling Flow from Reactor Vessel (18 January 1996, Topic: Reactor Vessel Water Level)
- Information Notice 1996-06, Design & Testing Deficiencies of Tornado Dampers at Nuclear Power Plants (25 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-07, Slow Five Percent Scram Insertion Times Caused by Viton Diaphragms in Scram Solenoid Pilot Valves (26 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-08, Thermally Induced Pressure Locking of a High Pressure Coolant Injection Gate Valve (5 February 1996, Topic: Anchor Darling, Cold shutdown justification)
- Information Notice 1996-09, Damage in Foreign Steam Generator Internals (12 February 1996, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1996-10, Potential Blockage by Debris of Safety System Piping Which Is Not Used During Normal Operation or Tested During Surveillances (13 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-10, Potential Blockage by Debris of Safety System Piping Which is Not Used During Normal Operation or Tested During Surveillances (13 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-11, Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential For Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations (14 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-11, Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations (14 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-12, Control Rod Insertion Problems (15 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-13, Potential Containment Leak Paths Through Hydrogen Analysis (26 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-14, Degradation of Radwaste Facility Equipment at Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (1 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-15, Unexpected Plant Performance During Performance of New Surveillance (8 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-16, BWR Operation with Indicated Flow Less than Natural Circulation (14 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-17, Reactor Operation Inconsistent with the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (18 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-18, Compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 for Airborne Thorium (25 March 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-19, Failure of Tone Alert Radios to Activate When Receiving a Shortened Activation Signal (2 April 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-20, Demonstration of Associated Equipment Compliance with 10 CFR 34.20 (4 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-21, Safety Concerns Related to the Design of the Door Interlock Circuit on Nucletron High-Dose Rate and Pulsed Dose Rate Remote Afterloading Brachytherapy Devices (10 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-22, Improper Equipment Settings Due to Use of Nontemperature-Compensated Test Equipment (11 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-23, Fires in Emergency Diesel Generator Exciters During Operation Following Undetected Fuse Blowing (22 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-24, Preconditioning of Molded-Case Circuit Breakers Before Surveillance Testing (25 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-25, Traversing In-Core Probe Overwithdrawn at Lasalle County Station, Unit 1 (30 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-26, Recent Problems with Overhead Cranes (30 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-26, Recent Problems With Overhead Cranes (30 April 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-27, Potential Clogging of High Pressure Safety Injection Throttle Valves During Recirculation (1 May 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-28, Suggested Guidance Relating to Development and Implementation of Corrective Action (1 May 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-29, Requirements in 10 CFR Part 21 for Reporting and Evaluating Software Errors (20 May 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-30, Inaccuracy of Diagnostic Equipment for Motor-Operated Butterfly Valves (21 May 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-31, Cross-Tied Safety Injection Accumulators (22 May 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-32, Implementation of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) (6) (II) (A), Augmented Examination of Reactor Vessel (5 June 1996, Topic: Non-Destructive Examination)
- Information Notice 1996-32, Implementation of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) (6) (ii) (A), Augmented Examination of Reactor Vessel (5 June 1996, Topic: Nondestructive Examination)
- Information Notice 1996-33, Erroneous Data From Defective Thermocouple Results in a Fire (24 May 1996, Topic: Reverse polarity)
- Information Notice 1996-33, Erroneous Data from Defective Thermocouple Results in a Fire (24 May 1996, Topic: Reverse polarity)
- Information Notice 1996-34, Hydrogen Gas Ignition During Closure Welding of a VSC-24 Multi-Assembly Sealed Basket (31 May 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-35, Failure of Safety Systems on Self-Shielded Irradiators Because of Inadequate Maintenance and Training (11 June 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-36, Degradation of Cooling Water Systems Due to Icing (12 June 1996, Topic: High winds, Ultimate heat sink, Frazil ice)
- Information Notice 1996-37, Inaccurate Reactor Water Level Indication and Inadvertent Draindown During Shutdown (18 June 1996, Topic: Reactor Vessel Water Level)
- Information Notice 1996-38, Results of Steam Generator Tube Examinations (21 June 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-39, Estimates of Decay Heat Using ANS 5.1 Decay Heat Standard May Vary Significantly (5 July 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-40, Defciencies in Material Dedication and Procurement Practices and in Audits of Vendors (7 October 1996, Topic: Coatings, Troxler Moisture Density Gauge)
- Information Notice 1996-41, Effects of a Decrease in Feedwater Temperature on Nuclear Instrumentation (26 July 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-42, Unexpected Opening of Multiple Safety Relief Valves (5 August 1996, Topic: Reactor Vessel Water Level)
- Information Notice 1996-43, Failures of General Electric Magne-Blast Circuit Breakers (2 August 1996)
... further results |
---|